1
|
Xia L, Daneshmand S. Update on the Management of Low-stage Seminoma. Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:377-385. [PMID: 38925740 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
The contemporary paradigm of testicular cancer management is achieving high and durable cure rates while minimizing the burden of treatment given the potential long-term toxicities associated with radiation therapy and systemic therapies. The management of low-stage seminoma has seen significant changes in recent years. Nuances of surveillance strategies for stage I seminoma exist and continue to evolve. Emerging data show retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a viable treatment option for selected patients with clinical stage IIA and IIB seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leilei Xia
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA.
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Suite 7416, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Pfister D. Regionalization of Testis Cancer Care-Is It Necessary? Urol Clin North Am 2024; 51:421-427. [PMID: 38925744 DOI: 10.1016/j.ucl.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors are rare genitourinary malignancies, but they represent the most common malignancies in men aged 15 to 30 years. Whereas the initial steps of management such as staging imaging studies, inguinal orchiectomy, and tumor marker can be performed elsewhere, the surgical and cytotoxic therapy needs to be done at reference centers. Regionalization of testis care has been shown to result in superior oncological outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Austria.
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne 50937, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thor A, Negaard HF, Grenabo Bergdahl A, Almås B, Melsen Larsen S, Lundgren PO, Gerdtsson A, Halvorsen D, Johannsdottir B, Jansson AK, Hellström M, Wahlqvist R, Langberg CW, Hedlund A, Akre O, Glimelius I, Ståhl O, Haugnes HS, Cohn-Cedermark G, Kjellman A, Tandstad T. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection as Treatment for Low-volume Metastatic Seminoma in a Population-based Cohort: The Swedish Norwegian Testicular Cancer Group Experience. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 65:13-19. [PMID: 38966804 PMCID: PMC11222926 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective There is an unmet need to avoid long-term morbidity associated with standard cytotoxic treatment for low-volume metastatic seminoma. Our aim was to assess the oncological efficacy and surgical safety of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as treatment in a population-based cohort of metastatic seminoma patients with limited retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. Methods Sixty-two seminoma patients in Norway and Sweden were included in the cohort from 2019 to 2022. Patients with lymphadenopathy ≤3 cm, having primary clinical stage (CS) IIA/B or CS I with a relapse, were operated with uni- or bilateral template RPLND, open or robot assisted. The outcome measures included surgical complications as per Clavien-Dindo, and Kaplan-Meier survival estimates for 24-mo progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Key findings and limitations In the cohort, 33 (53%) had CS I with a relapse during surveillance, six (10%) CS I with a relapse following adjuvant chemotherapy, and 23 (37%) initial CS IIA/B. Metastatic seminoma was verified in 58 patients (94%) with a median largest diameter of 18 mm (interquartile range [IQR] 13-24). Robot-assisted RPLND was performed in 40 patients (65%). Clavien-Dindo III complications were observed in three patients (5%); no grade ≥IV complications occurred. Eighteen patients (29%) received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. The median follow-up was 23 mo (IQR 16-30), and recurrence occurred in six patients (10%) after a median of 8 mo (IQR 4-14). PFS was 90% (95% confidence interval: 0.86-1) and OS was 100% at 24 mo. Conclusions and clinical implications RPLND as primary treatment is an option for selected low-stage seminomas with a limited burden of disease, showing low complications and low relapse rates, with the potential to reduce long-term morbidity. Patient summary In seminoma patients with limited metastatic spread, surgery is a treatment option offering an alternative to chemotherapy or radiation. This paper covers the first 62 patients operated in Norway and Sweden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Thor
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Anna Grenabo Bergdahl
- Department of Urology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Bjarte Almås
- Department of Urology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Per-Olof Lundgren
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Axel Gerdtsson
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Institution of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Dag Halvorsen
- Department of Urology, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Berglind Johannsdottir
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna K. Jansson
- Department of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Martin Hellström
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Rolf Wahlqvist
- Department of Urology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Annika Hedlund
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics & Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Olof Ståhl
- Department of Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Hege Sagstuen Haugnes
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UIT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Gabriella Cohn-Cedermark
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Genitourinary Oncology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology - Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anders Kjellman
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Urology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Urology, Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Torgrim Tandstad
- The Cancer Clinic, St. Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cazzaniga W, Pierorazio P, Heidenreich A. Review of Discordance Between American Urological Association and European Association of Urology Guideline Recommendations for Testicular Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024:S2405-4569(24)00079-8. [PMID: 38849277 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024]
Abstract
We compared the American Urological Association and the European Association of Urology guidelines on testicular cancer. We identified a few differences, in particular for management of low-volume metastatic serum tumor marker-negative stage IIA/B seminoma and nonseminoma, and of advanced and relapsing disease. Overall the rate of concordance between the guidelines is high. PATIENT SUMMARY: We compared guidelines on testicular cancer published by the American Urological Association and the European Association of Urology. We found a high rate of agreement between the two guidelines, with some differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Cazzaniga
- Department of Urology, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Phillip Pierorazio
- Section of Urology, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Seelemeyer F, Pfister D, Pappesch R, Merkelbach-Bruse S, Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A. Evaluation of a miRNA-371a-3p Assay for Predicting Final Histopathology in Patients Undergoing Primary Nerve-sparing Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Stage IIA/B Seminoma or Nonseminoma. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:319-322. [PMID: 37932157 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
Patients with marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B seminoma or nonseminoma represent a therapeutic challenge, as 20-30% might harbor nonmalignant histologies. MicroRNA 371a-3p (miR371) may represent a biomarker with diagnostic and predictive properties in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCTs). We evaluated the predictive accuracy of this biomarker in identifying the presence or absence of lymph node metastases (LNMs) in clinical stage IIA/B TGCT. In a cohort of 24 consecutive patients with marker-negative clinical stage IIA/B TGCT (n = 15 seminoma, n = 9 nonseminoma) serum miR371 was assessed 1 d before nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. Histology revealed metastatic TGCT in 22/24 patients (91.7%), with positive miR371a findings for 20 of these 22 patients with metastases (90.9%). Histology revealed no malignancy in one patient and lymphoma in another, both of whom had negative miR371a findings. One additional patient with pure teratoma and one with a microscopic seminomatous LNM had false-negative miR371a findings. The miR371 assay had sensitivity of 90.9% and specificity of 50%. The positive predictive value was 100.0% and the negative predictive value was 75.0%. According to the data available, miR371a represents a highly reliable, personalized tumor marker for predicting the presence of low-volume retroperitoneal LNMs in marker-negative TGCT. miR371 has potential for inclusion in the diagnostic armamentarium for men with equivocal lymph nodes to facilitate avoidance of unnecessary treatment and the associated toxicity. PATIENT SUMMARY: Our study demonstrates that blood tests for the biomarker miR371 are highly reliable in predicting the presence of lymph node metastases in patients with stage IIA/B testicular cancer. For patients with equivocal findings, use of this test may help in avoiding unnecessary treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Seelemeyer
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Roberto Pappesch
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | | | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Myers AA, Briganti A, Leibovich B, Lerner SP, Moschini M, Rouprêt M, Shariat SF, Spiess PE, Stenzl A, Taneja SS, Touijer KA, Kamat AM. Contemporary Role of Lymph Node Dissection in Genitourinary Cancers: Where Are We in 2023? Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:412-420. [PMID: 37980250 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.10.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Lymphadenectomy during surgery for genitourinary malignancies has varying benefits. OBJECTIVE To review contemporary evidence on lymph node dissection in genitourinary cancers. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION We performed a collaborative review to summarize current evidence supporting lymph node dissection in urothelial, prostate, kidney, penile, and testis cancers. We present the evidence on patient selection and recommended dissection templates, and highlight knowledge gaps and ongoing areas of investigation. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Lymph node dissection remains the reference standard for lymph node staging. Pathologic nodal stage informs prognosis and guides adjuvant treatment. Appropriate template and patient selection are paramount to optimize outcomes and capitalize on the selective therapeutic benefits. CONCLUSIONS Accurate staging with lymphadenectomy is contingent on appropriate template selection. The cumulative benefit will depend on judicious patient selection. PATIENT SUMMARY We performed a collaborative review by a diverse group of experts in urology. We reviewed current evidence on lymph node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda A Myers
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Seth P Lerner
- Dan L. Duncan Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology, Unit of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of GU Oncology and Tumor Biology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arnulf Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Samir S Taneja
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Karim A Touijer
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ashish M Kamat
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yuen KL, Pandit K, Puri D, Yodkhunnatham N, Bagrodia A. Testicular cancer with small metastatic burden: optimal approach in 2024. Curr Opin Urol 2024; 34:204-209. [PMID: 38305430 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Recent advancements in the management of clinical stage II (CS II) testicular cancer have transformed it into a predominantly curable condition. This success in treatment advancements has markedly extended patient survival. However, these treatments carry risks and morbidities, which is important to consider given the disease's impact on young men and the emerging understanding of long-term treatment consequences. RECENT FINDINGS Emerging data support primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for select CS II seminoma patients, with similar short-term outcomes to chemotherapy but less treatment intensity. Recent studies have also challenged the reflexive use of adjuvant chemotherapy for pathologic node-positive disease, as growing evidence shows low relapse rates regardless of nodal stage. Furthermore, novel biomarkers like circulating serum microRNA-371a-3p levels can help predict the presence of viable germ cell tumor at time of RPLND. SUMMARY Advances in risk stratification and therapy enable personalized de-escalation approaches for oligometastatic testicular cancer, optimizing survivorship. Upfront RPLND, reassessing adjuvant systemic therapy for RPLND pN+ disease, and novel biomarkers will shape precision treatment to achieve high cure rates with excellent quality of life. Ongoing trials of reduced-intensity regimens, accurate prognostic models, improved surgical strategy, and emerging biomarkers represent the next frontier in tailored curative therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kit L Yuen
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Małkiewicz B, Świrkosz G, Lewandowski W, Demska K, Szczepaniak Z, Karwacki J, Krajewski W, Szydełko T. Lymph Node Dissection in Testicular Cancer: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Curr Oncol Rep 2024; 26:318-335. [PMID: 38430323 PMCID: PMC11021343 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-024-01511-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/03/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolving role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in the management of testicular cancer (TC). It explores the significance of RPLND as both a diagnostic and therapeutic tool, highlighting its contribution to accurate staging, its impact on oncological outcomes, and its influence on subsequent treatment decisions. RECENT FINDINGS RPLND serves as an essential diagnostic procedure, aiding in the precise assessment of lymph node involvement and guiding personalized treatment strategies. It has demonstrated therapeutic value, particularly in patients with specific risk factors and disease stages, contributing to improved oncological outcomes and survival rates. Recent studies have emphasized the importance of meticulous patient selection and nerve-sparing techniques to mitigate complications while optimizing outcomes. Additionally, modern imaging and surgical approaches have expanded the potential applications of RPLND. In the context of TC management, RPLND remains a valuable and evolving tool. Its dual role in staging and therapy underscores its relevance in contemporary urological practice. This review highlights the critical role of RPLND in enhancing patient care and shaping treatment strategies, emphasizing the need for further research to refine patient selection and surgical techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bartosz Małkiewicz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
| | - Gabriela Świrkosz
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Lewandowski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Demska
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Zuzanna Szczepaniak
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
| | - Jakub Karwacki
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Wojciech Krajewski
- Department of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Tomasz Szydełko
- University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dason S, Lee CT. Paradigm Shifting Research: Key Studies in Urologic Oncology. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:2529-2537. [PMID: 38300402 PMCID: PMC10908645 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14838-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Genitourinary malignancies have a substantial impact on men and women in the USA as they include three of the ten most common cancers (prostate, renal, and bladder). Other urinary tract cancers are less common (testis and penile) but still have profound treatment implications related to potential deficits in sexual, urinary, and reproductive function. Evidenced-based practice remains the cornerstone of treatment for urologic malignancies. METHODS The authors reviewed the literature in consideration of the four top articles influencing clinical practice in the prior calendar year, 2022. RESULTS The PROTECT trial demonstrates favorable 15-years outcomes for active monitoring of localized prostate cancer. The SEMS trial establishes retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a viable option for patients with seminoma of the testis with limited retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. CheckMate 274 supports adjuvant immunotherapy following radical cystectomy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer with a high risk of recurrence. Data reported from the IROCK consortium reinforce stereotactic ablative radiotherapy as an option for localized renal cell carcinoma. CONCLUSION The care for patients with urologic cancers has been greatly improved through advances in surgical, medical, and radiation oncologic treatments realized through prospective randomized clinical trials and large multicenter collaborative groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn Dason
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Cheryl T Lee
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lesko P, Obertova J, Kajo K, Rejlekova K, Orszaghova Z, Lehotska V, Ondrusova M, Chovanec M, Ondrus D, Mego M. Testicular Seminoma in Prostate: Case Report and Review of Literature. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:210-216. [PMID: 38040557 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.10.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Lesko
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Jana Obertova
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Karol Kajo
- Department of Pathology, St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Katarina Rejlekova
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Zuzana Orszaghova
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Viera Lehotska
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Martina Ondrusova
- Department of Preventive and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Public Health, Slovak Medical University, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Michal Chovanec
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Dalibor Ondrus
- 1st Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & St. Elisabeth Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic
| | - Michal Mego
- 2nd Department of Oncology, Comenius University, Faculty of Medicine & National Cancer Institute, Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kardoust Parizi M, Margulis V, Bagrodia A, Bekku K, Klemm J, Matsukawa A, Alimohammadi A, Motlagh RS, Mostafaei H, Laukhtina E, Shariat SF. Primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for clinical stage II seminoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and oncological effectiveness. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:102-109. [PMID: 38360519 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
To evaluate the oncological outcomes and safety of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) in patients with clinical stage (CS) II seminomatous testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT). A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library was conducted on July 2023 to identify relevant studies according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The pooled recurrence rate and treatment-related complications were calculated using a random effects model. Overall 8 studies published between 1997 and 2023 including a total of 355 patients were selected for systematic review and meta-analysis with the overall median follow-up of 38 months. The overall and infield recurrence rate were 0.14 (95% CI: 0.08-0.22) and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.00-0.11), respectively. The overall pooled rate of ≥ Clavien Dindo grade III complications was 0.04 (95% CI: 0.01-0.10); there was no significant heterogeneity (I^2 = 35.10%, P = 0.19). Antegrade ejaculation was preserved with the overall pooled rate of 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-1.00); there was no significant heterogeneity on Chi-square and I2 tests (I^2 = 0.00%, P = 0.58). Primary RPLND is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with CS II seminomatous TGCT resulting highly promising cure rates combined with low treatment-associated adverse events, at medium-term follow-up. However, owing to the lack of comparative studies to the current standard of care and the limited follow-up, individual decision must be made with the informed patient in a shared decision process together with a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Aditya Bagrodia
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kensuke Bekku
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jakob Klemm
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Akihiro Matsukawa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Arman Alimohammadi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prag, Czech Republic; Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Joyce DD, Sharma V, Wymer KM, Moriarty JP, Borah BJ, Walia A, Costello BA, Pagliaro LC, Daneshmand S, Leibovich BC, Boorjian SA. Comparative cost-effectiveness of contemporary treatment strategies for stage IIA seminoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:468-475. [PMID: 37819776 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djad211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma (SEMS) trial examined retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as first-line treatment for patients with isolated 1-3 cm retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. To date, the standard of care for these patients has been either chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Herein, we evaluated the relative cost-effectiveness of these management strategies. METHODS A microsimulation model assessed the cost-effectiveness of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy for stage IIA seminoma. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection recurrence probabilities were obtained from the SEMS trial. All other probability and utility values were obtained from published literature. Primary outcomes included costs from a commercial insurer's perspective, effectiveness (quality adjusted life-years [QALYs]), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000/QALY. RESULTS At a lifetime horizon, the mean costs per patient for retroperitoneal lymph node dissection, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were $58 469, $98 783, and $104 096, and the mean QALYs were 40.61, 40.70, and 39.15, respectively. Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was found to be the most cost-effective approach because of high costs and accrued disutility of chronic toxicities associated with radiotherapy (cost-effectiveness ratios = $433 845/QALY) and chemotherapy (dominated). On 1-way sensitivity analyses, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was no longer cost-effective if the probabilities of infertility and cardiovascular toxicity after radiotherapy were less than 13% and 16%, respectively, or if the 2-year probability of progression after retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was more than 26%. CONCLUSIONS Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection was the most cost-effective treatment approach for stage IIA seminoma. These findings support clinical guideline consideration of including retroperitoneal lymph node dissection as a treatment option for well-selected patients with stage IIA seminoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel D Joyce
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Kevin M Wymer
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - James P Moriarty
- Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Bijan J Borah
- Department of Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Arman Walia
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bradley C Leibovich
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Stephen A Boorjian
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McHugh DJ, Gleeson JP, Feldman DR. Testicular cancer in 2023: Current status and recent progress. CA Cancer J Clin 2024; 74:167-186. [PMID: 37947355 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/29/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumor (GCT) is the most common solid tumor in adolescent and young adult men. Progress in the management of GCT has been made in the last 50 years, with a substantial improvement in cure rates for advanced disease, from 25% in the 1970s to nearly 80%. However, relapsed or platinum-refractory disease occurs in a proportion, 20% of whom will die from disease progression. This article reviews the current evidence-based treatments for extracranial GCT, the acute and chronic toxic effects that may result, and highlights contemporary advances and progress in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deaglan J McHugh
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jack P Gleeson
- Cancer Research, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Medical Oncology Department, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Darren R Feldman
- Genitourinary Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
- Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Heidenreich A, Paffenholz P, Hartmann F, Seelemeyer F, Pfister D. Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Clinical Stage IIA/B Metastatic Seminoma: Results of the COlogne Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy In Metastatic Seminoma (COTRIMS). Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:122-127. [PMID: 37438222 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation therapy and systemic chemotherapy are recommended treatment options in marker-negative clinical stage (CS) IIA/B seminoma. Despite high cure rates of 82-94%, both therapeutic options are associated with significant long-term toxicities. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the feasibility, oncological efficacy, and treatment-associated morbidity of primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (nsRPLND) in CS IIA/B seminoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective, single-arm, clinical phase 2 trial including CS IIA/B seminoma patients was conducted. INTERVENTION Primary nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Relapse-free and overall survival, surgery-associated complications according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and Kaplan-Meier methods for survival calculation were assessed. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Thirty patients at a mean age of 39.1 (34-52) yr with marker-negative CS IIA and IIB seminomas were recruited. The median follow-up was 22 (8-30) mo. Nineteen (63%) and 11 (36%) patients were diagnosed with stages IIA and B, respectively, at the time of primary diagnosis. Fourteen (47%) and 16 (53%) patients were diagnosed with CS IIA and IIB, respectively, at the time of nsRPLND. Twenty-seven and three patients underwent open and robot-assisted nsRPLND, respectively. The median operating room time was 125 (115-145) min, median blood loss was <150 ml, and median time of hospitalization was 4.5 (3-9) d. Four (13%) patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade 3a complications. Lymph node histology revealed seminoma in 25 (80%) patients; two and three patients demonstrated embryonal carcinoma and benign disease, respectively. Sixteen patients underwent a serum analysis of miR371 preoperatively, which predicted metastatic disease in 12/13 and benign histology in 3/3 patients. Three of 30 (10%) patients developed an outfield relapse 4, 6, and 9 mo postoperatively and were salvaged by systemic chemotherapy. Limitations are the low patient number and length of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The nsRPLND approach results in a high cure rate at midterm follow-up and is associated with a low frequency of treatment-associated morbidities, making this approach a feasible alternative to radiation therapy or systemic chemotherapy. PATIENT SUMMARY The standard treatment of clinical stage IIA/B seminomas is radiation therapy or chemotherapy, which results in a significantly increased frequency of long-term toxicity and secondary neoplasms. In this trial, we demonstrate that nerve-sparing retroperitoneal lymph node dissection is a feasible therapeutic approach with low morbidity and high oncological efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Pia Paffenholz
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Florian Hartmann
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felix Seelemeyer
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - David Pfister
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Specialized Urologic Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Chavarriaga J, Atenafu EG, Mousa A, Langleben C, Anson-Cartwright L, Jewett M, Hamilton RJ. Propensity-matched Analysis of Open Versus Robotic Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Clinical Stage II Testicular Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00032-4. [PMID: 38278693 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (O-RPLND) is the accepted standard surgical approach to treat retroperitoneal nodal disease in testis cancer. Increasingly, robotic RPLND (R-RPLND) is being performed due to the potential for lower blood loss, shorter length of stay, and accelerated recovery. OBJECTIVE We have performed a propensity score matching (PSM) analysis comparing the survival and perioperative outcomes of O- and R-RPLND. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Analyzing the data from all patients who underwent primary RPLND at our center between 1990 and 2022, we used PSM to create a 2:1 (O-RPLND:R-RPLND) matched cohort. INTERVENTION Primary O-RPLND versus R-RPLND. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint was time to relapse. The secondary endpoints included operating time, length of stay, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical complications. Relapse-free survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and log-rank tests were used to compare perioperative outcomes of O-RPLND versus R-RPLND. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 178 patients underwent primary RPLND: 137 O-RPLND and 41 R-RPLND. After PSM, 26 patients in the R-RPLND group were matched with 38 in the O-RPLND group. After matching, no significant baseline differences were noted. After a median follow-up of 23.5 mo (interquartile range 4.4-59.2), one (3.8%) relapse was noted in the R-RPLND group versus three (7.8%) in the O-RPLND group; however, this was not significant (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.07-6.31, p = 0.7097). No in-field relapses occurred in either cohort. R-RPLND was associated with a shorter length of stay (1 vs 5 d, p < 0.0001) and lower EBL (200 vs 300 ml, p = 0.032), but longer operative time (8.8 vs 4.3 h, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS R-RPLND offers low morbidity and improved perioperative outcomes, while maintaining oncologic efficacy of the open approach. PATIENT SUMMARY To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to compare open and robotic retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (R-RPLND) using a propensity score-matched system. We encourage the discussion and inclusion of primary R-RPLND into the standard of care algorithm for patients with de novo clinical stage (CS) II and relapsed CS I with CS II equivalent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Eshetu G Atenafu
- Department of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ahmad Mousa
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carley Langleben
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lynn Anson-Cartwright
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Michael Jewett
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert J Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Farkouh A, Shete K, Cheng KW, Buell MI, Hu B. A systematic review of pN0 testicular seminoma: a new clinical entity and future directions. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:476-482. [PMID: 37968167 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023]
Abstract
Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) for testicular seminoma with enlarged retroperitoneal lymph nodes has received increased consideration and exposed a new clinical entity: pN0 disease. Enlarged, nonmetastatic retroperitoneal lymph nodes provide insight into the natural history of seminoma while offering a benchmark for improving the accuracy of staging. The purpose of this systematic review was to report the pN0 rates, describe risk factors associated with it, and discuss emerging research that may reduce its incidence. We performed a systemic review of published literature on PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, as well as oncology meeting abstracts evaluating histology of lymph nodes in patients with testicular seminoma treated primarily with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. Studies were excluded if histology was not reported. A total of 15 publications and abstracts were included. Although study designs were heterogeneous, there was a minimal risk of bias. Overall, the reported pN0 rates were 0% to 22%. In prospective clinical trials it was 9% to 16%. The presence of pN0 was associated with preoperative smaller lymph nodes, a solitary enlarged lymph node, or negative serum miRNA-371. The incidence of pN0 seminoma is concerning as it points to a potential historical overtreatment; however, it also represents an important inflection for testicular cancer research as quantifiable improvements in clinical staging will translate to clear benefits to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ala'a Farkouh
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Kanha Shete
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Kai Wen Cheng
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Matthew I Buell
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Brian Hu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
D'Souza A, King J, Nappi L, Daneshmand S, Nichols C, Kollmannsberger C. Favorable long-term Health Related Quality of Life in cured survivors of testicular cancer management. So, what now? Ann Oncol 2023; 34:1077-1079. [PMID: 38072510 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- A D'Souza
- Department of Medicine, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles
| | - J King
- Department of Medicine, Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center 535 Barnhill Dr. RT 461, Indianapolis
| | - L Nappi
- Div. of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Vancouver Cancer Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada
| | - S Daneshmand
- Institute of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
| | - C Nichols
- Div. of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Vancouver Cancer Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada; Testicular Cancer Commons, Beaverton, Oregon, USA
| | - C Kollmannsberger
- Div. of Medical Oncology, British Columbia Cancer Vancouver Cancer Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Rosen DB, Tan AJN, Pursley J, Kamran SC. Advances in radiation therapy for testicular seminoma. World J Urol 2023; 41:3895-3903. [PMID: 37979002 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04674-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Novel techniques and advances in radiation therapy (RT) have been explored to treat testicular seminoma, a highly radiosensitive and curable histology. We evaluated the historical and current indications for radiation therapy (RT) in testicular seminoma. METHODS A narrative literature review was performed. Studies of RT for testicular seminoma were included. Additionally, recent trials testing the use of combination or surgical therapies for clinical stage (CS) II were included. Search parameters included radiation therapy, testicular seminoma, surgery, and chemoradiation. Parameters and outcomes assessed were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), acute toxicities, long-term sequelae, and rates of secondary malignancies. RESULTS Practice defining and changing studies in the use or omission of radiation therapy for testicular seminoma were identified along with resultant changes in National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and European guidelines. Recent trials in combined chemoradiation and upfront surgical approaches to CS II disease were reviewed. CONCLUSION RT has historically been used as adjuvant treatment for CS I disease and is highly effective at treating CS II (A/B) testicular seminoma. The drive to maintain therapeutic efficacy and reduce acute and long-term side effects, namely secondary malignancies, is being tested using new radiation technologies, combined modality therapy in the form of chemoradiation and with upfront surgical approaches. Also, as guidelines now "strongly prefer" surveillance instead of adjuvant RT for CS I disease, the current CS II population comprises patients presenting with CS II disease ("de novo") and those who present with CSII after relapsing post orchiectomy for CS I ("relapsed"). Emerging evidence suggests that these two groups have different outcomes with respect to RT and chemoradiation. Consequently, future trials may need to sub-stratify according to these groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arvin Jeremy N Tan
- Internal Medicine Residency Program, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Jennifer Pursley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sophia C Kamran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Liu J, Thomas B, Lawrentschuk N. Re: Surgery in Early Metastatic Seminoma: A Phase II Trial of Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Seminoma with Limited Retroperitoneal Lymphadenopathy. Eur Urol 2023; 84:438-439. [PMID: 37385842 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.05.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jianliang Liu
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Benjamin Thomas
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- E.J. Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Healthcare, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia; Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Sigg S, Fankhauser CD. The role of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the treatment of stage II seminoma. Curr Opin Urol 2023; 33:245-251. [PMID: 37144886 PMCID: PMC10256310 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000001099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Stage II seminoma is responsive to chemo- or radiotherapy with a progression-free survival of 87-95% at 5 years but at the cost of short- and long-term toxicity. After evidence about these long-term morbidities emerged, four surgical cohorts investigating the role of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND) as a treatment option for stage II disease were initiated. RECENT FINDINGS Currently, two RPLND series have been published as a complete report, while data from other series have only been published as congress abstracts. In series without adjuvant chemotherapy, recurrence rates ranged from 13% to 30% after follow-ups of 21-32 months. In those receiving RPLND and adjuvant chemotherapy, the recurrence rate was 6% after a mean follow-up of 51 months. Across all trials, recurrent disease was treated with systemic chemotherapy (22/25), surgery (2/25), and radiotherapy (1/25). The rate of pN0 disease after RPLND varied between 4% and 19%. Postoperative complications were reported in 2-12%, while antegrade ejaculation was maintained in 88-95% of patients. Median length of stay ranged from 1 to 6 days. SUMMARY In men with clinical stage II seminoma, RPLND is a safe and promising treatment option. Further research is needed to determine the risk of relapse and to personalize treatment options based on patient-specific risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvan Sigg
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne
| | - Christian Daniel Fankhauser
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, University of Lucerne, Lucerne
- University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Singh K, Mandal S, Kumar Das M, Nayak P, Tripathy S. Re: Andreas Hiester, Yue Che, Achim Lusch, et al. Phase 2 Single-arm Trial of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Seminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors with Clinical Stage IIA/B (PRIMETEST). Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.021. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e156. [PMID: 36906412 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.12.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Kirti Singh
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India.
| | - Swarnendu Mandal
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Manoj Kumar Das
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Prasant Nayak
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India
| | - Sambit Tripathy
- Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences-Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar, India
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Wood GE, Chamberlain F, Tran B, Conduit C, Liow E, Nicol DL, Shamash J, Alifrangis C, Rajan P. Treatment de-escalation for stage II seminoma. Nat Rev Urol 2023:10.1038/s41585-023-00727-0. [PMID: 36882564 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-023-00727-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2023]
Abstract
International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good-risk metastatic seminoma has cure rates of >95%. Within this risk group, patients with stage II disease exhibit the best oncological outcomes with the standard-of-care treatment strategies of radiotherapy or combination chemotherapy. However, these treatments can be associated with substantial early and late toxic effects. Therapy de-escalation aims to reduce treatment morbidity whilst preserving oncological outcomes. The evidence supporting such approaches is largely from non-randomized institutional data, and therefore this strategy is not recognized as standard of care. Current de-escalation approaches for stage II seminoma include single-agent chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery based on early data from clinical studies. Increased recognition of emerging data on treatment modification to reduce morbidity whilst maintaining cure rates and consideration of therapy de-escalation could improve patient survivorship outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgina E Wood
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ciara Conduit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Liow
- Division of Personalized Medicine, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David L Nicol
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jonathan Shamash
- Department of Medical Oncology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Constantine Alifrangis
- Department of Medical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. .,National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | - Prabhakar Rajan
- Centre for Cancer Cell and Molecular Biology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. .,Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK. .,Department of Urology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK. .,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Che Y, Hiester A, Albers P. Reply to Kirti Singh, Swarnendu Mandal, Manoj Kumar Das, Prasant Nayak, and Sambit Tripathy's Letter to the Editor re: Andreas Hiester, Yue Che, Achim Lusch, et al. Phase 2 Single-arm Trial of Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Seminomatous Testicular Germ Cell Tumors with Clinical Stage IIA/B (PRIMETEST). Eur Urol. In press. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.10.021. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e157. [PMID: 36870796 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2023.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Che
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Hiester
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
| | - Peter Albers
- Department of Urology, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bandini M, Nini A, Briganti A, Necchi A, Montorsi F. Is chemoradiotherapy worth it in metastatic seminoma as first-line treatment? Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e65. [PMID: 36725145 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00743-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bandini
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Nini
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy; Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, University of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Andrea Necchi
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute (URI), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan 20132, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Albersen M, Van den Broeck T. Stage II Seminoma: Is There Something New on the Horizon? EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 49:78-79. [PMID: 36793749 PMCID: PMC9923177 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Van den Broeck
- Corresponding author. Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Alsyouf M, Daneshmand S. Primary Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection in Stage I and Low-volume Metastatic Germ Cell Tumors. Eur Urol Focus 2023; 9:248-250. [PMID: 36707277 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) are the most common malignancy among young males. The majority of patients present with early stages of the disease that are highly curable. For stage I disease, treatment options include surveillance, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND), and systemic chemotherapy. For stage II disease, systemic therapy had been the mainstay of treatment. However, it has recently been shown that primary RPLND is effective as a treatment for low-volume metastatic GCT and offers the benefit of avoiding chemotherapy in young men at risk of suffering the long-term sequelae of systemic treatments. In this narrative mini-review, we evaluate the data on primary RPLND for the management of stage I and low-volume metastatic GCT. PATIENT SUMMARY: This mini-review discusses the role of surgery involving removal of retroperitoneal lymph nodes for stage I and low-volume stage II testicular cancer. We found that for well-selected patients, surgery can be curative in the majority of cases and avoids the risks associated with systemic chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhannad Alsyouf
- USC Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- USC Department of Urology, USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|