1
|
Dalal A, Clark-Garvey S, Gdowski A, Zhang S, Wobker SE, Rowe SP, Altun E, Beltran H, Milowsky MI. A Case of Rapidly Progressive De Novo Metastatic Small-Cell Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer. Case Rep Oncol Med 2024; 2024:7998149. [PMID: 39318975 PMCID: PMC11421938 DOI: 10.1155/2024/7998149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/07/2024] [Indexed: 09/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Neuroendocrine/small-cell prostate cancer (NEPC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of prostate cancer, which typically develops after prolonged treatment for metastatic castration-resistant disease, but can, less commonly, occur de novo. Case Presentation: We describe a case of de novo NEPC in a tumor with mixed pathology including acinar adenocarcinoma and neuroendocrine/small-cell carcinoma with rapid progression of metastatic disease. Despite initiation of treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and chemotherapy, the patient continued to exhibit progression leading to multiple complications including a large bowel obstruction and ultimately progressive hepatic metastases resulting in liver failure. Conclusion: This case illustrates the clinical presentation and highly aggressive nature of de novo NEPC. Recognizing atypical clinical progression in prostate cancer is critical for the detection of NEPC; however, despite early identification and initiation of treatment, the prognosis remains poor, thus highlighting the need for further study into NEPC biology and novel therapeutic approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aryan Dalal
- Department of BiostatisticsUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sean Clark-Garvey
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Andrew Gdowski
- Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sophia Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sara E. Wobker
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Steven P. Rowe
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ersan Altun
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Department of Medical OncologyDana-Farber Cancer InstituteHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Matthew I. Milowsky
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wenzel M, Siech C, Hoeh B, Koll F, Humke C, Tilki D, Steuber T, Graefen M, Banek S, Kluth LA, Chun FK, Mandel P. Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Oncological Outcomes of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer and First- to Sixth- line Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 66:46-54. [PMID: 39036044 PMCID: PMC11260326 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective With approval of novel systemic therapies within the past decade for metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration-resistant (mCRPC) prostate cancer, patients may receive several therapy lines. However, the use of these treatments is under an ongoing change. We investigated contemporary treatment trends and progression-free (PFS) and overall (OS) survival of different therapy lines. Methods Relying on our institutional tertiary-care database, we identified mHSPC and mCRPC patients. The main outcome consisted of treatment changes (estimated annual percentage change [EAPC]) within the past decade, as well as PFS and OS for different mHSPC and mCRPC treatment lines. Key findings and limitations In 1098 metastatic patients, the median age was 70 yr with a median of two systemic therapy lines. For first-line mCRPC between 2013 and 2023, androgen deprivation monotherapy (ADT) monotherapy usage decreased significantly from 31% to 0% (EAPC -38.3%, p < 0.001), while the administration of chemotherapy increased from 16.7% to 33.3% (EAPC: +10.1%, p < 0.001). The PFS/OS rates of mHSPC patients was 21/67 mo, and those for first-, second-, third-, fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-line mCRPC patients were 11/47, eight of 30, seven of 24, six of 19, seven of 17, and seven of 13 mo, respectively. With an increased number of new combination therapy lines received, the median OS in mCRPC improved from 26 mo (one systemic treatment) to 52 mo (two or more lines of systemic treatment). Conclusions and clinical implications Significant changes in treatment patterns could be observed for mHSPC and mCRPC patients within the past decade, and usage of ADT monotherapy has decreased rapidly in real-world practice. Moreover, PFS decreases significantly with every therapy line, and OS increases with the implementation of new therapies. Patient summary Improvements in the real-world setting regarding the usage of combination therapies for metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant prostate cancer were made, which is reflected in contemporary survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Carolin Siech
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Florestan Koll
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clara Humke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Séverine Banek
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Luis A. Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K.H. Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sitharthan D, Kang S, Treacy PJ, Bird J, Alexander K, Karunaratne S, Leslie S, Chan L, Steffens D, Thanigasalam R. The Sensitivity and Specificity of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Predicting Seminal Vesicle Invasion in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. J Clin Med 2024; 13:4424. [PMID: 39124692 PMCID: PMC11312943 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13154424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2024] [Revised: 07/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The presence of seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) in prostate cancer (PCa) is associated with poorer postoperative outcomes. This study evaluates the predictive value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT) for SVI in PCa. Methods: This cohort study included consecutive robotic prostatectomy patients for PCa at three Australian tertiary referral centres between April 2016 and September 2022. MRI and PSMA PET/CT results, clinicopathological variables, including age, BMI, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, DRE, Biopsy Gleason score, Positive biopsy cores, PIRADS v2.1 score, MRI volume and MRI lesion size were extracted. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MRI and PSMA PET/CT for predicting SVI were compared with the histopathological results by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Subgroup univariate and multivariate analysis was performed. Results: Of the 528 patients identified, 86 had SVI on final pathology. MRI had a low sensitivity of 0.162 (95% CI: 0.088-0.261) and a high specificity of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.940-0.979). The PSMA PET/CT had a low sensitivity of 0.439 (95% CI: 0.294-0591) and a high specificity of 0.933 (95% CI: 0.849-0.969). When MRI and PSMA PET/CT were used in combination, the sensitivity and specificity improved to 0.514 (95%CI: 0.356-0.670) and 0.880 (95% CI: 0.813-0.931). The multivariate regression showed a higher biopsy Gleason score (p = 0.033), higher PSA (p < 0.001), older age (p = 0.001), and right base lesions (p = 0.003) to be predictors of SVI. Conclusions: MRI and PSMA PET/CT independently underpredicted SVI. The sensitivity and AUC improved when they were used in combination. Multiple clinicopathological factors were associated with SVI on multivariate regression and predictive models incorporating this information may improve oncological outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darshan Sitharthan
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Song Kang
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Patrick-Julien Treacy
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Jacob Bird
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Kate Alexander
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Sascha Karunaratne
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Scott Leslie
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Department of Urology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (RPAH), Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Lewis Chan
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH), Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia
| | - Daniel Steffens
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
| | - Ruban Thanigasalam
- Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Missenden Road, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- RPA Institute of Academic Surgery (IAS), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
- Department of Urology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital (CRGH), Sydney, NSW 2139, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kurokawa K, Yamada Y, Sakamoto S, Horikoshi T, Sato K, Nanba S, Kubota Y, Kanesaka M, Fujimoto A, Takeuchi N, Shibata H, Sazuka T, Imamura Y, Tsuzuki T, Uno T, Ichikawa T. Implications of unconventional histological subtypes on magnetic resonance imaging and oncological outcomes in patients who have undergone radical prostatectomy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:14868. [PMID: 38937563 PMCID: PMC11211384 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65681-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
The prognostic significance of unconventional histology (UH) subtypes including intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P), ductal adenocarcinoma, and cribriform pattern has been investigated for prostate cancer (PCa). However, little is known about magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features and the oncological impact of tumor localization in localized PCa with UH. Clinical data of 211 patients with acinar adenocarcinoma (conventional histology [CH]) and 82 patients with UH who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) were reviewed. Patients with UH are more likely to be older and have higher Gleason grade group, higher Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 score, and larger tumor volume (TV) than those with CH. Multivariate analysis identified the presence of UH as an independent prognostic factor for progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ration (HR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.79, P = 0.0073). No significant difference in PFS was seen regarding tumor localization (transition zone [TZ] or peripheral zone [PZ]) in patients with UH (P = 0.8949), whereas PZ cancer showed shorter PFS in patients with CH (P = 0.0174). PCa with UH was associated with higher progression than PCa with CH among resection margin (RM)-negative cases (P < 0.0001). Further, increased PI-RADS v2.1 score did not correlate with larger TV in UH (P = 0.991), whereas a significant difference in TV was observed in CH (P < 0.0001). The prognostic significance of UH tumor was independent of tumor localization, and shorter PFS was observed even in RM-negative cases, indicating an aggressive subtype with micro-metastatic potential. Furthermore, UH tumors are more likely to harbor a large TV despite PI-RADS v2.1 score ≤ 3. These findings will help optimal perioperative management for PCa with UH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koichiro Kurokawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Yasutaka Yamada
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan.
| | - Takuro Horikoshi
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 2608677, Japan
| | - Kodai Sato
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Sakie Nanba
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 2608677, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Kubota
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 2608677, Japan
| | - Manato Kanesaka
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Ayumi Fujimoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Nobuyoshi Takeuchi
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Hiroki Shibata
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Tomokazu Sazuka
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Yusuke Imamura
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| | - Toyonori Tsuzuki
- Department of Surgical Pathology, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, 4801195, Japan
| | - Takashi Uno
- Department of Radiology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, 2608677, Japan
| | - Tomohiko Ichikawa
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-Ku, Chiba-City, Chiba, 260-8670, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leung D, Castellani D, Nicoletti R, Dilme RV, Sierra JM, Serni S, Franzese C, Chiacchio G, Galosi AB, Mazzucchelli R, Palagonia E, Dell'Oglio P, Galfano A, Bocciardi AM, Zhao X, Ng CF, Lee HY, Sakamoto S, Vasdev N, Rivas JG, Campi R, Teoh JYC. The Oncological and Functional Prognostic Value of Unconventional Histology of Prostate Cancer in Localized Disease Treated with Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: An International Multicenter 5-Year Cohort Study. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:581-588. [PMID: 38185614 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2023] [Revised: 12/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE The impact of prostate cancer of unconventional histology (UH) on oncological and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) receipt is unclear. We compared the impact of cribriform pattern (CP), ductal adenocarcinoma (DAC), and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in comparison to pure adenocarcinoma (AC) on short- to mid-term oncological and functional results and receipt of aRT after RARP. METHODS We retrospectively collected data for a large international cohort of men with localized prostate cancer treated with RARP between 2016 and 2020. The primary outcomes were biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, erectile and continence function. aRT receipt was a secondary outcome. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression analyses were performed. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS A total of 3935 patients were included. At median follow-up of 2.8 yr, the rates for BCR incidence (AC 10.7% vs IDC 17%; p < 0.001) and aRT receipt (AC 4.5% vs DAC 6.3% [p = 0.003] vs IDC 11.2% [p < 0.001]) were higher with UH. The 5-yr BCR-free survival rate was significantly poorer for UH groups, with hazard ratios of 1.67 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.16-2.40; p = 0.005) for DAC, 5.22 (95% CI 3.41-8.01; p < 0.001) for IDC, and 3.45 (95% CI 2.29-5.20; p < 0.001) for CP in comparison to AC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of UH doubled the risk of new-onset erectile dysfunction at 1 yr, in comparison to AC (grade group 1-3), with hazard ratios of 2.13 (p < 0.001) for DAC, 2.14 (p < 0.001) for IDC, and 2.01 (p = 0.011) for CP. Moreover, CP, but not IDC or DAC, was associated with a significantly higher risk of incontinence (odds ratio 1.97; p < 0.001). The study is limited by the lack of central histopathological review and relatively short follow-up. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In a large cohort, UH presence was associated with worse short- to mid-term oncological outcomes after RARP. IDC independently predicted a higher rate of aRT receipt. At 1-yr follow-up after RP, patients with UH had three times higher risk of erectile dysfunction post RARP; CP was associated with a twofold higher incontinence rate. PATIENT SUMMARY Among patients with prostate cancer who undergo robot-assisted surgery to remove the prostate, those with less common types of prostate cancer have worse results for cancer control, erection, and urinary continence and a higher probability of receiving additional radiotherapy after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Leung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Daniele Castellani
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Rossella Nicoletti
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | | | | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Carmine Franzese
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Chiacchio
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Andrea Benedetto Galosi
- Division of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria, Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Roberta Mazzucchelli
- Section of Pathological Anatomy, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, School of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Erika Palagonia
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Galfano
- Urology Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Xue Zhao
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Chi Fai Ng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Shinichi Sakamoto
- Department of Urology, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Nikhil Vasdev
- Department of Urology, Lister Hospital, East and North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, UK
| | - Juan Gomez Rivas
- Department of Urology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muthusamy S, Smith SC. Contemporary Diagnostic Reporting for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: Morphologic Aspects, Molecular Correlates, and Management Perspectives. Adv Anat Pathol 2024; 31:188-201. [PMID: 38525660 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
The diagnosis and reporting of prostatic adenocarcinoma have evolved from the classic framework promulgated by Dr Donald Gleason in the 1960s into a complex and nuanced system of grading and reporting that nonetheless retains the essence of his remarkable observations. The criteria for the "Gleason patterns" originally proposed have been continually refined by consensuses in the field, and Gleason scores have been stratified into a patient-friendly set of prognostically validated and widely adopted Grade Groups. One product of this successful grading approach has been the opportunity for pathologists to report diagnoses that signal carefully personalized management, placing the surgical pathologist's interpretation at the center of patient care. At one end of the continuum of disease aggressiveness, personalized diagnostic care means to sub-stratify patients with more indolent disease for active surveillance, while at the other end of the continuum, reporting histologic markers signaling aggression allows sub-stratification of clinically significant disease. Whether contemporary reporting parameters represent deeper nuances of more established ones (eg, new criteria and/or quantitation of Gleason patterns 4 and 5) or represent additional features reported alongside grade (intraductal carcinoma, cribriform patterns of carcinoma), assessment and grading have become more complex and demanding. Herein, we explore these newer reporting parameters, highlighting the state of knowledge regarding morphologic, molecular, and management aspects. Emphasis is made on the increasing value and stakes of histopathologists' interpretations and reporting into current clinical risk stratification and treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Steven Christopher Smith
- Department of Pathology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, VCU School of Medicine, Richmond, VA
- Richmond Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Richmond, VA
- Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, VCU Health, Richmond, VA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Uleri A, Baboudjian M, Tedde A, Rajwa P, Pradere B, Gallioli A, Breda A, Ploussard G. The association between beta-blockers use and prostate cancer mortality: A mini systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate 2024; 84:3-7. [PMID: 37710384 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preclinical studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system is involved in the development of metastases, suggesting a potential antitumor effect of beta-blockers. These findings sparked a controversy over the past decade regarding the direction of the association between beta-blocker use and prostate cancer (PCa) mortality. To investigate this association, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS The review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines to identify eligible studies. The primary outcome was PCa mortality in beta-blocker users versus nonusers, and overall survival was studied as a secondary endpoint. We assessed heterogeneity using the Cochrane Q test and quantified it using I2 values. In the case of heterogeneity (Cochrane Q test p < 0.05 and I2 > 50%), random-effect models were used to determine the association between beta-blockers use and survival outcomes. RESULTS Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and a total of 74,970 patients were included: 26,674 beta-blocker users and 48,326 nonusers. There was no statistically significant association between beta-blocker exposure and PCa mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87-1.09; p = 0.61). However, significant heterogeneity was found. Meta-regression analysis to explain heterogeneity showed no effect of any of the variables assessed (country, percentage of beta-blocker users, type of beta-blocker [selective and nonselective], study period, PCa stage and follow-up duration; all p > 0.05). We found similar results when we restricted the analysis to studies that include only patients with advanced PCa (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.80-1.06; p = 0.24). Similarly, we found no association with overall survival (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.94-1.10; p = 0.64). Meta-regression analysis was also performed, but none of the variables assessed explained the observed heterogeneity (all p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS We found no association between beta-blockers use and overall survival or PCa mortality. This meta-analysis, which includes a considerable population and the most recent literature, provides important data for routine clinical care and patient counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Tedde
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hôpital, Quint Fonsegrives, France
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bernardino RM, Sayyid RK, Lajkosz K, Al-Daqqaq Z, Cockburn JG, Chavarriaga J, Abedi S, Leão R, Berlin A, van der Kwast T, Fleshner NE. Limitations of Prostate Biopsy in Detection of Cribriform and Intraductal Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Focus 2024; 10:146-153. [PMID: 37696743 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2023.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of cribriform morphology and intraductal carcinoma (IDC) in prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens is an adverse prognostic feature that can be used to guide treatment decisions. OBJECTIVE To assess how accurately biopsies can detect cribriform morphology and IDC cancer by examining matched biopsy and prostatectomy samples. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at The Princess Margaret Cancer Centre between January 2015 and December 2022 and had cribriform morphology and/or IDC in the surgical specimen were included in the study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We used detection sensitivity to evaluate the level of agreement between biopsy and prostatectomy samples regarding the presence of cribriform morphology and IDC. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Of the 287 men who underwent radical prostatectomy, 241 (84%) had cribriform morphology and 161 (56%) had IDC on final pathology. The sensitivity of prostate biopsy, using radical prostatectomy as the reference, was 42.4% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36-49%) for detection of cribriform morphology and 44.1% (95% CI 36-52%) for detection of IDC. The sensitivity of prostate biopsy for detection of either IDC or cribriform morphology was 52.5% (95% CI 47-58%). Among patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsies, the sensitivity was 54% (95% CI 39-68%) for detection of cribriform morphology and 37% (95% CI 19-58%) for detection of IDC. CONCLUSIONS Biopsy has low sensitivity for detecting cribriform morphology and IDC. These limitations should be incorporated into clinical decision-making. Biomarkers for better detection of these histological patterns are needed. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate biopsy is not an accurate method for detecting two specific types of prostate cancer cells, called cribriform pattern and intraductal prostate cancer, which are associated with unfavorable prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui M Bernardino
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada; Computational and Experimental Biology Group, NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Rashid K Sayyid
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Katherine Lajkosz
- Department of Statistics, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Zizo Al-Daqqaq
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jessica G Cockburn
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julian Chavarriaga
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Shideh Abedi
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ricardo Leão
- Hospital CUF, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Alejandro Berlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | | | - Neil E Fleshner
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guner LA, Unal K, Beylergil V, Tuna MB, Saglican Y, Vardareli E, Kural AR. Enhancing PSMA PET/CT imaging of prostate cancer: investigating the impact of multiple time point evaluation, diuretic administration, cribriform pattern, and intraductal carcinoma. Ann Nucl Med 2023; 37:618-628. [PMID: 37783903 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01864-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to correlate staging PSMA PET imaging parameters to final histopathology. Second objective was to assess the performance of standard versus delayed PSMA PET to detect primary prostate tumor. METHODS Thirty-one patients (mean age, 61.4 ± 8.2) who underwent radical prostatectomy and preoperative staging PSMA PET scans were included in the study. After defining dominant lesion in pathology, correlations with PET images were performed. Additionally, two physicians blind to clinical and pathological information retrospectively reviewed staging Ga-68 PSMA PET scans with standard and delayed imaging. RESULTS Dominant lesion SUV's increased with time 8.2(± 4.5), 10(± 7.1), and 10.2(± 7.8) at 1, 2, and 3 h (P = .03 T1-T3). WHO Grade group 3 had highest SUV (group 3 11.9 ± 5.6 vs. group 2 7.9 ± 1.5, p = .02). Addition of cribriform pattern on intraductal component was associated with higher SUV's (11 ± 2.9 vs. 6.5 ± 2.1, p = .01) and higher Gleason four ratios (64 ± 9% vs. 37 ± 17%, p = .01). Intraductal carcinoma was associated with larger tumors (6.3 ± 2.3 cm3 vs. 2.6 ± 1.7 cm3, p < .001). Physician sensitivities ranged from 61 to 81%. Excluding Gleason 3 + 3 lesions and small lesions (< 1 cm3), sensitivities increased to 80-100%. Differences of sensitivity between different time points were not significant. Combined evaluation of all time points did not increase sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS Cribriform pattern correlates with higher Gleason 4 ratios and SUVs in PSMA PET. Intraductal carcinoma is associated with larger tumors but not higher Gleason 4 ratios and SUVs. Multiple late imaging times did not enhance tumor detection and may pose tolerability issues for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Levent A Guner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Acibadem University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Kemal Unal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Acibadem University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Beylergil
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Imaging, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, USA
| | | | - Yesim Saglican
- Department of Pathology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Erkan Vardareli
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Acibadem University, Acibadem Maslak Hospital, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Riza Kural
- Department of Urology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rossin G, Zorzi F, De Pablos-Rodríguez P, Biasatti A, Marenco J, Ongaro L, Perotti A, Tulone G, Traunero F, Piasentin A, Gomez-Ferrer A, Zucchi A, Trombetta C, Simonato A, Rubio-Briones J, Bartoletti R, Ramírez-Backhaus M, Claps F. Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Prostate Cancer: An Overview of Diagnostic Performance, Oncological Outcomes, Safety, and Feasibility. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:2543. [PMID: 37568905 PMCID: PMC10416990 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13152543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/29/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) for prostate cancer (PCa) represents an innovative technique aimed at improving nodal staging accuracy. The routinary adoption of this procedure in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) might be crucial to identify candidates who could effectively benefit from extensive pelvic lymph nodal dissection (ePLND). Despite some promising results, SNB for PCa is still considered experimental due to the lack of solid evidence and procedural standardization. In this regard, our narrative review aimed to analyze the most recent literature in this field, providing an overview of both the diagnostic accuracy measures and the oncological outcomes of SNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Rossin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Federico Zorzi
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Pedro De Pablos-Rodríguez
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Arianna Biasatti
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Josè Marenco
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Luca Ongaro
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alessandro Perotti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Gabriele Tulone
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - Fabio Traunero
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Andrea Piasentin
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alvaro Gomez-Ferrer
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Alessandro Zucchi
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Carlo Trombetta
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
| | - Alchiede Simonato
- Urology Clinic, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Stomatological Sciences, University of Palermo, 90133 Palermo, Italy; (G.T.); (A.S.)
| | - José Rubio-Briones
- Clínica de Urología, Hospital VITHAS 9 de Octubre, 46015 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Riccardo Bartoletti
- Department of Translational Research and New Technologies, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; (A.P.); (A.Z.); (R.B.)
| | - Miguel Ramírez-Backhaus
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| | - Francesco Claps
- Urological Clinic, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Strada di Fiume, 447, 34149 Trieste, Italy; (G.R.); (F.Z.); (A.B.); (L.O.); (F.T.); (A.P.); (C.T.)
- Department of Urology, Valencian Oncology Institute Foundation, FIVO, 46009 Valencia, Spain; (P.D.P.-R.); (J.M.); (A.G.-F.); (M.R.-B.)
| |
Collapse
|