Development and evaluation of a capacity building program in gender-relevant tobacco control research: A Brazilian experience

Unexpected capacity-building experiences of multicultural, multilingual participants in a public health initiative

AIMS

This study of a levy-voter funded public health initiative program (1) identifies capacity-building concerns, (2) summarizes those concerns at the community-based organization (CBO) level, and (3) documents the desired CBO capacity-building outcome.

PARTICIPANTS

Nineteen participants from nine CBOs were included, representing 95% of participants (19/20) and 90% of CBOs (9/10) from the initiative's program population.

METHODS

Interviews were conducted. A focus group validated data. Demographic surveys were completed.

METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS

Data were analyzed using demographic and inductive content analyses. Fifteen capacity-building unexpected concerns were identified. Participants from eight out of nine (88.8%) CBOs shared at least ten concerns. Seven CBO capacity-building outcomes were identified.

RESULTS

Capacity-building providers helped participants mitigate the Initiative's capacity-building testing of the National Implementation Research Network (NIRN) model. Participants' NIRN processes were Western and mainstream. Participants wanted community-designed processes and the funder to understand CBO clients' backgrounds, cultures, and languages. The contract money did not match the needed capacity-building processes, time, and workload.

DISCUSSION

The funder's pre-selected the NIRN Western majority approach did not fit. Participants wanted to lead. Capacity-building only for home-based program development was less desired. Social justice leadership could have made a difference.

Research capacity, motivators and barriers to conducting research among healthcare providers in Tanzania's public health system: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND

Building health research capacity in low- and middle-income countries is essential to achieving universal access to safe, high-quality healthcare. It can enable healthcare workers to conduct locally relevant research and apply findings to strengthen their health delivery systems. However, lack of funding, experience, know-how, and weak research infrastructures hinders their ability. Understanding research capacity, engagement, and contextual factors that either promote or obstruct research efforts by healthcare workers can inform national strategies aimed at building research capacity.

METHODS

We used a convergent mixed-methods study design to understand research capacity and research engagement of healthcare workers in Tanzania's public health system, including the barriers, motivators, and facilitators to conducting research. Our sample included 462 randomly selected healthcare workers from 45 facilities. We conducted surveys and interviews to capture data in five categories: (1) healthcare workers research capacity; (2) research engagement; (3) barriers, motivators, and facilitators; (4) interest in conducting research; and (5) institutional research capacity. We assessed quantitative and qualitative data using frequency and thematic analysis, respectively; we merged the data to identify recurring and unifying concepts.

RESULTS

Respondents reported low experience and confidence in quantitative (34% and 28.7%, respectively) and qualitative research methods (34.5% and 19.6%, respectively). Less than half (44%) of healthcare workers engaged in research. Engagement in research was positively associated with: working at a District Hospital or above (p = 0.006), having a university degree or more (p = 0.007), and previous research experience (p = 0.001); it was negatively associated with female sex (p = 0.033). Barriers to conducting research included lack of research funding, time, skills, opportunities to practice, and research infrastructure. Motivators and facilitators included a desire to address health problems, professional development, and local and international collaborations. Almost all healthcare workers (92%) indicated interest in building their research capacity.

CONCLUSION

Individual and institutional research capacity and engagement among healthcare workers in Tanzania is low, despite high interest for capacity building. We propose a fourfold pathway for building research capacity in Tanzania through (1) high-quality research training and mentorship; (2) strengthening research infrastructure, funding, and coordination; (3) implementing policies and strategies that stimulate engagement; and (4) strengthening local and international collaborations.

Evaluation of Five Data-to-Action Workshops to Enhance Capacity for Tobacco Control

BACKGROUND

Five data-to-action workshops were conducted during 2016-2019 with participants from 38 countries. The purpose of the workshops is to use data to inform and disseminate tobacco prevention and control strategies. We evaluated the workshops using the Kirkpatrick Model for evaluation of trainings.

METHODS

We evaluated the data-to-action workshops in three topic areas: (1) if the workshop was clear, useful, engaging, and relevant to the participant's work, (2) self-reported knowledge and skills for tobacco control topics, and (3) intention to apply the knowledge learned. We used nonparametric tests (one-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test) and conducted descriptive analysis to assess the difference between pre- and postworkshop scores in each topic area. Free text data from open-ended responses were analyzed in Excel using thematic content analysis.

RESULTS

Participants reported the workshop had a clear purpose (93.6%, n = 73), was well organized (94.9%, n = 74), and relevant to their work (96.2%, n = 76). There was a statistically significant increase in median learning scores across all three knowledge and five skills topic areas (p < 0.05); more than 95% of participants intended to apply the knowledge they obtained during the workshop and planned to perform new skills learned in the workshop.

CONCLUSIONS

Programs interested in replicating a similar successful model may incorporate a mix of modes of instruction and hands-on experiences, as well as focus on the selection of the right audience, for their workshops. These workshops pose an opportunity for countries to enhance use and dissemination of their tobacco control data.