Interactions of cone abundancies, opsin expression, and environmental lighting with emmetropization in chickens

Integrative Transcriptome and Proteome Analyses Elucidate the Mechanism of Lens-Induced Myopia in Mice

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the underlying molecular mechanism of lens-induced myopia (LIM) through transcriptome and proteome analyses with a modified mouse myopia model.

Methods

Four-week-old C57BL/6J mice were treated with a homemade newly designed -25 diopter (D) lens mounting by a 3D printing pen before right eyes for 4 weeks. Refraction (RE) and axial dimensions were measured every 2 weeks. Retinas were analyzed by RNA-sequencing and data-independent acquisition liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) annotation, and STRING databases were used to identify significantly affected pathways in transcriptomic and proteomic data sets. Western blot was used to detect the expression of specific proteins.

Results

The modified model was accessible and efficient. Mice displayed a significant myopic shift (approximately 8 D) following 4 weeks' of lens treatment. Through transcriptomics and proteomics analysis, we elucidated 175 differently expressed genes (DEGs) and 646 differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) between binoculus. The transcriptomic and proteomic data showed a low correlation. Going over the mRNA protein matches, insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 1 (Igf2bp1) was found to be a convincing biomarker of LIM, which was confirmed by Western blot. RNA-seq and proteome profiling confirmed that these two "omics" data sets complemented one another in KEGG pathways annovation. Among these, metabolic and human diseases pathways were considered to be correlated with the LIM forming process.

Conclusions

The newly constructed LIM model provides a useful tool for future myopia research. Combining transcriptomic and proteomic analysis may potentially brighten the prospects of novel therapeutic targets for patients with myopia.

Retinal Neurotransmitter Alteration in Response to Dopamine D2 Receptor Antagonist from Myopic Guinea Pigs

This study aimed to investigate the changes in retinal neurotransmitters and the role of the dopamine D2 receptor (D2R) pathway in regulating the myopic refractive state. Tricolor guinea pigs were randomly divided into two groups: the normal control group (NC) and the form-deprivation myopia group (FDM). Animals in the FDM group had their right eye covered with a balloon for 4 weeks. These two groups were further divided into two subgroups based on intravitreal injection with D2R antagonist sulpiride once a week for 3 weeks (NC, NC-Sul, FDM, and FDM-Sul groups). Ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to quantitatively detect the changes in 17 retinal neurotransmitters. Compared to the NC group, the concentrations of dopamine (DA) and γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) decreased, while those of glutamate (Glu), 3-methoxytyramine (3-MT), and glycine increased, accompanied by an increase in myopic refraction and axial length (AL) in the FDM group. In the FDM-Sul group, glycine and DA levels were upregulated, whereas 3-MT and Glu levels were downregulated, accompanied by a decrease in myopic refraction and AL. The ratio of Glu to GABA (RGG) represents the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters. Notably, RGG changes occurred with corresponding AL changes, which increased in the FDM group and decreased in the FDM-Sul group. Decreased retinal DA concentration, with an increase in Glu, may be involved in the myopia progression. D2R antagonists might effectively slow myopia progression by increasing retinal DA, regulating Glu concentration to match GABA, and maintaining the balance between excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters.

L-opsin expression in chickens is similarly reduced with diffusers and negative lenses

Previous studies have shown that the expression of L- and M-opsins was reduced in chicken retina when eyes were covered with diffusers. The purpose of the current study was to find out whether this is a result of altered spatial processing during development of deprivation myopia or merely a consequence of light attenuation by the diffusers. Therefore, retinal luminances were matched by neutral density filters in fellow eyes that served as controls for diffuser-treated eyes. Furthermore, the effects of negative lenses on opsins expression were studied. Chickens wore diffusers or -7D lenses for a period of 7 days and refractive state and ocular biometry were measured at the beginning and at the end of the experiment. Retinal tissue was extracted from both eyes to quantify L-, M- and S-opsins expression by qRT-PCR. It was found that L-opsin expression was significantly lower in eyes wearing diffusers, compared to fellow eyes covered with neutral density filters. Interestingly, L-opsin was also reduced in eyes wearing negative lenses. In summary, this study shows that L-opsin expression is reduced due to the loss of high spatial frequencies and general contrast reduction in the retinal image, rather than by a decline in retinal luminance. Moreover, the fact that L-opsin was similarly reduced in eyes treated with negative lenses and diffusers suggests the existence of a common pathway for emmetropization, but it could also be just a consequence of reduced high spatial frequencies and lower contrast.

Efficacy of 0.01% atropine for myopia control in a randomized, placebo-controlled trial depends on baseline electroretinal response

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of 18-month 0.01% atropine in 61 myopic children (aged 7–10) and the relationship with central retinal response (by multifocal electroretinogram [mfERG]) in a double-masked randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial. Global-flash mfERG was measured at baseline, while cycloplegic spherical equivalent refraction (SER) and axial length (AL) were measured at baseline and at 6-month intervals. Annualized change in SER and AL were compared between atropine and control groups, and the relationships with baseline mfERG were evaluated. Changes in SER (−0.70 ± 0.39D vs. −0.66 ± 0.41D, p = 0.63) and AL (0.32 ± 0.16 mm vs. 0.30 ± 0.22 mm, p = 0.52) were similar in atropine and control groups. Interestingly, in the placebo group, mfERG amplitude was negatively correlated with axial elongation (R_p = −0.44, p = 0.03) as in our previous study. However, in the atropine group, an opposite trend was observed that axial elongation was positively correlated with mfERG amplitude (R_a = 0.37, p = 0.04). Annualized myopia progression demonstrated similar opposite effect between atropine and placebo groups but did not reach statistical significance. An ERG screening protocol may be warranted to identify suitable candidates to reduce the likelihood of an unfavorable treatment response by 0.01% atropine.

Light Signaling and Myopia Development: A Review

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this article was to comprehensively review the relationship between light exposure and myopia with a focus on the effects of the light wavelength, illuminance, and contrast on the occurrence and progression of myopia.

METHODS

This review was performed by searching PubMed data sets including research articles and reviews utilizing the terms "light", "myopia", "refractive error", and "illuminance", and the review was concluded in November 2021. Myopia onset and progression were closely linked with emmetropization and hyperopia. To better elucidate the mechanism of myopia, some of the articles that focused on this topic were included. This article is based on previously conducted studies and does not contain any new studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

RESULTS

The pathogenesis and prevention of myopia are not completely clear. Studies have provided evidence supporting the idea that light could affect eye growth in three ways. Changing the corresponding conditions will cause changes in the growth rate and mode of the eyes, and preliminary results have shown that FR/NIR (far red/near-infrared) light is effective for myopia in juveniles.

CONCLUSION

This review discusses the results of studies on the effects of light exposure on myopia with the aims of providing clues and a theoretical basis for the use of light to control the development of myopia and offering new ideas for subsequent studies.

Amber light treatment produces hyperopia in tree shrews

PURPOSE

Exposure to narrow-band red light, which stimulates only the long-wavelength sensitive (LWS) cones, slows axial eye growth and produces hyperopia in tree shrews and macaque monkeys. We asked whether exposure to amber light, which also stimulates only the LWS cones but with a greater effective illuminance than red light, has a similar hyperopia-inducing effect in tree shrews.

METHODS

Starting at 24 ± 1 days of visual experience, 15 tree shrews (dichromatic mammals closely related to primates) received light treatment through amber filters (BPI 500/550 dyed acrylic) either atop the cage (Filter group, n = 8, 300-400 human lux) or fitted into goggles in front of both eyes (Goggle group, n = 7). Non-cycloplegic refractive error and axial ocular dimensions were measured daily. Treatment groups were compared with age-matched animals (Colony group, n = 7) raised in standard colony fluorescent lighting (100-300 lux).

RESULTS

At the start of treatment, mean refractive errors were well-matched across the three groups (p = 0.35). During treatment, the Filter group became progressively more hyperopic with age (p < 0.001). By contrast, the Goggle and Colony groups showed continued normal emmetropization. When the treatment ended, the Filter group exhibited significantly greater hyperopia (mean [SE] = 3.5 [0.6] D) compared with the Goggle (0.2 [0.8] D, p = 0.01) and Colony groups (1.0 [0.2] D, p = 0.01). However, the refractive error in the Goggle group was not different from that in the Colony group (p = 0.35). Changes in the vitreous chamber were consistent with the refractive error changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Exposure to ambient amber light produced substantial hyperopia in the Filter group but had no effect on refractive error in the Goggle group. The lack of effect in the Goggle group could be due to the simultaneous activation of the short-wavelength sensitive (SWS) and LWS cones caused by the scattering of the broad-band light from the periphery of the goggles.

Contribution of M-opsin-based color vision to refractive development in mice

M-opsin, encoded by opn1mw gene, is involved in green-light perception of mice. The role of M-opsin in emmetropization of mice remains uncertain. To answer the above question, 4-week-old wild-type (WT) mice were exposed to white light or green light (460-600 nm, a peak at 510 nm) for 12 weeks. Refractive development was estimated biweekly. After treatment, retinal function was assessed using electroretinogram (ERG). Dopamine (DA) in the retina was evaluated by high-performance liquid chromatography, M-opsin and S-opsin protein levels by Western blot and ELISA, and mRNA expressions of opn1mw and opn1sw by RT-PCR. Effects of M-opsin were further verified in Opn1mw^-/- and WT mice raised in white light for 4 weeks. Refractive development was examined at 4, 6, and 8 weeks after birth. The retinal structure was estimated through hematoxylin and eosin staining (H&E) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Retinal wholemounts from WT and Opn1mw^-/- mice were co-immunolabeled with M-opsin and S-opsin, their distribution and quantity were then assayed by immunofluorescence staining (IF). Expression of S-opsin protein and opn1sw mRNA were determined by Western blot, ELISA, or RT-PCR. Retinal function and DA content were analyzed by ERG and liquid chromatography tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), respectively. Lastly, visual cliff test was used to evaluate the depth perception of the Opn1mw^-/- mice. We found that green light-treated WT mice were more myopic with increased M-opsin expression and decreased DA content than white light-treated WT mice after 12-week illumination. No electrophysiologic abnormalities were recorded in mice exposed to green light compared to those exposed to white light. A more hyperopic shift was further observed in 8-week-old Opn1mw^-/- mice in white light with lower DA level and weakened cone function than the WT mice under white light. Neither obvious structural disruption of the retina nor abnormal depth perception was found in Opn1mw^-/- mice. Together, these results suggested that the M-opsin-based color vision participated in the refractive development of mice. Overexposure to green light caused myopia, but less perception of the middle-wavelength components in white light promoted hyperopia in mice. Furthermore, possible dopaminergic signaling pathway was suggested in myopia induced by green light.

Spectral composition of artificial illuminants and their effect on eye growth in chicks

In broadband light, longitudinal chromatic aberration (LCA) provides emmetropization signals from both wavelength defocus and the resulting chromatic cues. Indoor illuminants vary in their spectral output, potentially limiting the signals from LCA. Our aim is to investigate the effect that artificial illuminants with different spectral outputs have on chick emmetropization with and without low temporal frequency modulation. In Experiment 1, two-week-old chicks were exposed to 0.2 Hz, square-wave luminance modulation for 3 days. There were 4 spectral conditions: LED strips that simulated General Electric (GE) LED "Soft" (n = 13), GE LED "Daylight" (n = 12), a novel "Equal" condition (n = 12), and a novel "High S" condition (n = 10). These conditions were all tested at a mean level of 985 lux. In Experiment 2, the effect of intensity on the "Equal" condition was tested at two other light levels (70 lux: n = 10; 680 lux: n = 7). In Experiment 3, the effect of temporal modulation on the "Equal" condition was tested by comparing the 0.2 Hz condition with 0 Hz (steady). Significant differences were found in axial growth across lighting conditions. At 985 lux, birds exposed to the "Equal" condition showed a greater reduction in axial growth (both p < 0.01) and a greater hyperopic shift compared to "Soft" and "Daylight" (both p < 0.01). The "High S" birds experienced more axial growth compared to "Equal" (p < 0.01) but less than in "Soft" and "Daylight" (p < 0.01). Axial changes in "Equal" were only observed at 985 lux with 0.2 Hz temporal modulation, and not with lower light levels or steady light. We conclude that axial growth and refraction were dependent on the lighting condition in a manner predicted by wavelength defocus signals arising from LCA.

Ocular growth and metabolomics are dependent upon the spectral content of ambient white light

Myopia results from an excessive axial growth of the eye, causing abnormal projection of remote images in front of the retina. Without adequate interventions, myopia is forecasted to affect 50% of the world population by 2050. Exposure to outdoor light plays a critical role in preventing myopia in children, possibly through the brightness and blue-shifted spectral composition of sunlight, which lacks in artificial indoor lighting. Here, we evaluated the impact of moderate levels of ambient standard white (SW: 233.1 lux, 3900 K) and blue-enriched white (BEW: 223.8 lux, 9700 K) lights on ocular growth and metabolomics in a chicken-model of form-deprivation myopia. Compared to SW light, BEW light decreased aberrant ocular axial elongation and accelerated recovery from form-deprivation. Furthermore, the metabolomic profiles in the vitreous and retinas of recovering form-deprived eyes were distinct from control eyes and were dependent on the spectral content of ambient light. For instance, exposure to BEW light was associated with deep lipid remodeling and metabolic changes related to energy production, cell proliferation, collagen turnover and nitric oxide metabolism. This study provides new insight on light-dependent modulations in ocular growth and metabolomics. If replicable in humans, our findings open new potential avenues for spectrally-tailored light-therapy strategies for myopia.

Tree shrews do not maintain emmetropia in initially-focused narrow-band cyan light

We asked if emmetropia, achieved in broadband colony lighting, is maintained in narrow-band cyan light that is well focused in the emmetropic eye, but does not allow for guidance from longitudinal chromatic aberrations (LCA) and offers minimal perceptual color cues. In addition, we examined the response to a -5 D lens in this lighting. Seven tree shrews from different litters were initially housed in broad-spectrum colony lighting. At 24 ± 1 days after eye opening (Days of Visual Experience, DVE) they were housed for 11 days in ambient narrow-band cyan light (peak wavelength 505 ± 17 nm) selected because it is in focus in an emmetropic eye. Perceptually, monochromatic light at 505 nm cannot be distinguished from white by tree shrews. While in cyan light, each animal wore a monocular -5 D lens (Cyan -5 D eyes). The fellow eye was the Cyan no-lens eye. Daily awake non-cycloplegic measures were taken with an autorefractor (refractive state) and with optical low-coherence optical interferometry (axial component dimensions). These measures were compared with the values of animals raised in standard colony fluorescent lighting: an untreated group (n = 7), groups with monocular form deprivation (n = 7) or monocular -5 D lens treatment (n = 5), or that experienced 10 days in total darkness (n = 5). Refractive state at the onset of cyan light treatment was low hyperopia, (mean ± SEM) 1.4 ± 0.4 diopters. During treatment, the Cyan no-lens eyes became myopic (-2.9 ± 0.3 D) whereas colony lighting animals remained slightly hyperopic (1.0 ± 0.2 D). Initially, refractions of the Cyan -5 D eyes paralleled the Cyan no-lens eyes. After six days, they gradually became more myopic than the Cyan no-lens eyes; at the end of treatment, the refractions were -5.4 ± 0.3 D, a difference of -2.5 D from the Cyan no-lens eyes. When returned to colony lighting at 35 ± 1 DVE, the no-lens eye refractions rapidly recovered towards emmetropia but, as expected, the refraction of the -5 D eyes remained near -5 D. Vitreous chamber depth in both eyes was consistent with the refractive changes. In narrow-band cyan lighting the emmetropization mechanism did not maintain emmetropia even though the light initially was well focused. We suggest that, as the eyes diverged from emmetropia, there were insufficient LCA cues for the emmetropization mechanism to utilize the developing myopic refractive error in order to guide the eyes back to emmetropia. However, the increased myopia in the Cyan -5 D eyes in the narrow-band light indicates that the emmetropization mechanism nonetheless detected the presence of the lens-induced refractive error and responded with increased axial elongation that partly compensated for the negative-power lens. These data support the conclusion that the emmetropization mechanism cannot maintain emmetropia in narrow-band lighting. The additional myopia produced in eyes with the -5 D lens shows that the emmetropization mechanism responds to multiple defocus-related cues, even under conditions where it is unable to use them to maintain emmetropia.