More than a quarter century of the most prescribed sleeping pill: Systematic review of zolpidem use by older adults

Association Between Hypnotics and Dementia: A Mini Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive assessment of the existing literature on the relationship between hypnotics and dementia, considering both potential link and inconclusive or lack of association.

METHODS

Data from studies that investigate the association between hypnotic medications and dementia were reviewed. Studies included both cohort studies and systematic reviews, participants with various type of dementia and hypnotics including benzodiazepines (BZDs) and Z-drugs (ZDs).

RESULTS

The existing literatures presents conflicting evidence regarding the association between hypnotics, including BZDs and ZDs, and the risk of dementia. Some studies suggest a potential link between prolonged use of hypnotics and an increased risk of dementia. However, other studies indicate inconclusive or lacking evidence regarding this association. Factors such as study design, sample characteristics, and control of confounding variables contribute to the variability in findings.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between hypnotics and dementia remains complex and controversial. While some studies suggest a potential association, others find inconclusive or conflicting evidence. Future research should focus on addressing methodological limitations, considering classifying dementia subtypes, and try to adjust medication lag time.

Alleviating sleep disturbances and modulating neuronal activity after ischemia: Evidence for the benefits of zolpidem in stroke recovery

AIMS

Sleep disorders are prevalent among stroke survivors and impede stroke recovery, yet they are still insufficiently considered in the management of stroke patients, and the mechanisms by which they occur remain unclear. There is evidence that boosting phasic GABA signaling with zolpidem during the repair phase improves stroke recovery by enhancing neural plasticity; however, as a non-benzodiazepine hypnotic, the effects of zolpidem on post-stroke sleep disorders remain unclear.

METHOD

Transient ischemic stroke in male rats was induced with a 30-minute middle cerebral artery occlusion. Zolpidem or vehicle was intraperitoneally delivered once daily from 2 to 7 days after the stroke, and the electroencephalogram and electromyogram were recorded simultaneously. At 24 h after ischemia, c-Fos immunostaining was used to assess the effect of transient ischemic stroke and acute zolpidem treatment on neuronal activity.

RESULTS

In addition to the effects on reducing brain damage and mitigating behavioral deficits, repeated zolpidem treatment during the subacute phase of stroke quickly ameliorated circadian rhythm disruption, alleviated sleep fragmentation, and increased sleep depth in ischemic rats. Immunohistochemical staining showed that in contrast to robust activation in para-infarct and some remote areas by 24 h after the onset of focal ischemia, the activity of the ipsilateral suprachiasmatic nucleus, the biological rhythm center, was strongly suppressed. A single dose of zolpidem significantly upregulated c-Fos expression in the ipsilateral suprachiasmatic nucleus to levels comparable to the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

Stroke leads to suprachiasmatic nucleus dysfunction. Zolpidem restores suprachiasmatic nucleus activity and effectively alleviates post-stroke sleep disturbances, indicating its potential to promote stroke recovery.

Prescrição de Benzodiazepinas e outros Sedativos na Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo de 2013 a 2020: Um Estudo Retrospetivo

Introdução: Portugal é o país da Organização para a Cooperação e Desenvolvimento Económico com maior consumo de ansiolíticos, hipnóticos e sedativos, sendo uma proporção significativa constituída por benzodiazepinas ou análogos, associados a efeitos de tolerância e dependência. Por este motivo, em alternativa às benzodiazepinas para tratamento da insónia, algumas publicações identificam outros fármacos com efeito hipnótico, como antidepressivos, anti-histamínicos, antipsicóticos ou anticonvulsivantes. Assim, torna-se necessário compreender a evolução do consumo destes medicamentos, pelo que foi objetivo deste estudo avaliar a evolução da dispensa de benzodiazepinas, outros fármacos ansiolíticos, hipnóticos ou sedativos não benzodiazepínicos, fármacos com potencial uso off-label na insónia e os resultados de indicadores dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários neste âmbito na região de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo.Material e Métodos: Realizou-se um estudo em base de dados, censitário e retrospetivo, no período de 2013 até 2020, avaliando-se a evolução das variáveis total de doses diárias definidas, doses diárias definidas por 1000 habitantes por dia (DHD) e dos indicadores relevantes. Os dados foram extraídos da plataforma SIARS da Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo.Resultados: Verificou-se uma diminuição da dispensa de benzodiazepinas (de 57,44 para 51,77 DHD) mas o aumento da dispensa de não benzodiazepinas e de fármacos com potencial uso off-label (de 6,56 para 8,56 DHD e de 14,70 para 25,92 DHD, respetivamente). O zolpidem foi o mais dispensado entre os fármacos não benzodiazepínicos, acompanhando a tendência crescente de dispensa (de 4,86 para 6,96 DHD). Do conjunto de fármacos com potencial para uso off-label verificaram-se aumentos da dispensa para a trazodona (de 3,81 para 7,92 DHD), mirtazapina (de 3,52 para 6,48 DHD), pregabalina (de 3,15 para 4,87 DHD), quetiapina (de 2,68 para 4,59 DHD) e gabapentina (de 1,32 para 1,90 DHD), mas mais significativo ou apenas verificado nas formulações com dosagem mais baixa. A mediana dos resultados do indicador “proporção de idosos sem prescrição de sedativos, ansiolíticos e hipnóticos” em 2015 foi de 81,0, tendo em 2020 aumentado para 84,9. A mediana do indicador “proporção de utentes sem prescrição prolongada de ansiolíticos, sedativos e hipnóticos” em 2019 foi de 93,6 e aumentou para 94,3 em 2020.Conclusão: Globalmente, verificou-se uma redução da dispensa de benzodiazepinas prescritas na Região de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo. Parece existir uma alteração do padrão de prescrição no tratamento da insónia. São necessários estudos mais robustos para confirmar esta observação.

Cardiac events and economic burden among patients with hypertension and treated insomnia in the USA

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) event risk, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and costs have not been elucidated among hypertension patients with treated insomnia (H + TI). Materials & methods: Adult patients with H + TI were identified in IBM MarketScan databases. H + TI patients were matched 1:1 on age and sex to controls with hypertension but without sleep disorders. Multivariable models were used to estimate associations between treated insomnia and CV event risk, HCRU and costs. Results: In total, 81,502 H + TI patients (mean age = 62 years, 53% female) were matched. Relative to controls, H + TI patients were 2.4 times as likely to have CV events. H + TI patients incurred higher costs per patient per month (US$2343 vs US$1013). Conclusion: Treated insomnia was associated with higher costs and HRCU in hypertension patients.

Falls, healthcare resources and costs in older adults with insomnia treated with zolpidem, trazodone, or benzodiazepines

Background

Falls are the leading cause of injury-related death among older Americans. While some research has found that insomnia heightens falls, health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs, the impact of insomnia treatments on fall risk, mortality, HCRU and costs in the elderly population, which could be of substantial interest to payers, has not been fully elucidated. This study evaluated the risk of falls and related consequences among adults ≥ 65 years of age treated with common prescription medications for insomnia compared with non-sleep disordered controls.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort analysis of deidentified Medicare claims from January 2011 through December 2017. Medicare beneficiaries treated for insomnia receiving zolpidem extended-release, zolpidem immediate-release, trazodone, or benzodiazepines were matched with non-sleep disordered controls. The main outcomes were falls, mortality, healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and medical costs during the 12 months following the earliest fill date for the insomnia medication of interest. Generalized linear models controlled for several key covariates, including age, race, sex, geographic region and Charlson Comorbidity Index score.

Results

The study included 1,699,913 Medicare beneficiaries (59.9% female, mean age 75 years). Relative to controls, adjusted analyses showed that beneficiaries receiving insomnia medication experienced over twice as many falls (odds ratio [OR] = 2.34, 95% CI: 2.31–2.36). In adjusted analyses, patients receiving benzodiazepines or trazodone had the greatest risk. Crude all-cause mortality rates were 15-times as high for the insomnia-treated as controls. Compared with controls, beneficiaries receiving insomnia treatment demonstrated higher estimated adjusted mean number of inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits and longer length of inpatient stay. All-cause total adjusted mean costs were higher among insomnia treated patients ($967 vs $454).

Conclusions

Individuals receiving insomnia treatment had an increased risk of falls and mortality and higher HCRU and costs compared with matched beneficiaries without sleep disorders. Trazodone and benzodiazepines were associated with the greatest risk of falls. This analysis suggests that significant risks are associated with common, older generation insomnia medication treatments in the elderly. Nonetheless, these results should be interpreted with caution as the use of these medications may be indicative of underlying morbidity with potential for residual confounding.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03165-6.

Fall Risk, Healthcare Resource Use, and Costs Among Adult Patients in the United States Treated for Insomnia with Zolpidem, Trazodone, or Benzodiazepines: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Falls are a common cause for morbidity and mortality among patients taking prescription insomnia medication. The objective of this study is to compare the risk of falls, all-cause healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), and costs among patients treated with commonly used, older generation insomnia medications and non-sleep-disordered controls.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used the IBM^® MarketScan^® Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases to identify patients aged at least 18 years treated with commonly prescribed medications for insomnia (zolpidem, trazodone, benzodiazepines) between 1 January 2012 and 30 September 2017. The insomnia-treated cohort were age- and sex-matched (1:1) to non-sleep-disordered controls. Odds ratios (ORs) compared risk of falls in each cohort, adjusting for covariates. Costs were adjusted to 2018 dollars, the most recent year for the study data.

RESULTS

Relative to matched controls (n = 313,086), the insomnia-treated cohort had a higher rate of falls (3.34% vs. 1.33%), and higher risk of falls [OR = 2.36 (95% confidence interval 2.27-2.44)]. Relative to other index treatments, patients treated with trazodone had the greatest risk of falls. Compared with matched controls, the estimated mean number of inpatient visits, emergency department visits, outpatient visits, and mean length of inpatient stay were all significantly higher among patients treated for insomnia. Such patients incurred greater total costs per patient per month than matched controls ($2100 versus $888; estimated mean ratio, 2.36; 95% CI 2.35-2.38; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Relative to matched controls, the insomnia-treated cohort showed higher risk of falls with greater HCRU and costs. Each outcome measured was highest among patients treated with trazodone, relative to other index treatments. Findings suggest the need for new treatment options to optimize quality of care for patients with insomnia.

Efficacy and safety of Z-substances in the management of insomnia in older adults: a systematic review for the development of recommendations to reduce potentially inappropriate prescribing

BACKGROUND

Z-drugs are usually prescribed as first line pharmacological therapy for insomnia. However, the benefits and risks of Z-drugs may differ for older adults. This systematic review investigated the available evidence on the efficacy and safety of Z-drugs in the management of insomnia in older adults.

METHODS

The Cochrane database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for systematic reviews, meta-analyses, controlled interventional and observational studies using a pre-formulated search term. The target population was older adults (≥65 years old) with insomnia. Studies were included if they reported efficacy and/or safety outcomes of the use of Z-drugs for the management of insomnia compared to placebo, usual or no treatment, or other pharmacological agents.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were included (8 interventional and 10 observational studies). In short-term interventional studies, Z-drugs were similarly or better efficacious in improving both sleep and daytime parameters than placebo or other pharmacological treatments, while showing good results on measures of safety. However, in longer-term observational studies, Z-drugs significantly increased the risk for falls and fractures in comparison to no treatment or melatonin agonists.

CONCLUSIONS

Analyzing the evidence from short-term interventional studies, Z-drugs appear effective and safe for treatment of insomnia in older adults, but they may have unfavorable side effects when used for longer periods of time. We, therefore, recommend discontinuing Z-drugs, principally because of the high risk for falls and fractures. Nonetheless, quality and quantity of evidence are low. Due to the scarcity of data, especially concerning drug dependence after longer periods of treatment and due to the significantly increased risk for falls and fractures, further studies are needed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of Z-drugs use in older patients, particularly for long-term use.

The efficacy and safety of zolpidem and zopiclone to treat insomnia in Alzheimer's disease: a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled trial

No prior studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of zolpidem and zopiclone to treat insomnia of demented patients. This randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial used these drugs to treat patients with probable, late onset Alzheimer's dementia (AD) (DSM V and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria) exhibiting insomnia (DSM V criteria and nocturnal NPI scores ≥ 2). Actigraphic records were performed for 7 days at baseline and for 14 days during the treatment period in 62 patients aged 80.5 years in average and randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio for administration of zolpidem 10 mg/day, zopiclone 7.5 mg/day or placebo. Primary endpoint was the main nocturnal sleep duration (MNSD), whereas secondary outcomes were the proportion of the night time slept, awake time after sleep onset (WASO), nocturnal awakenings, total daytime sleep time and daytime naps. Cognitive and functional domains were tested before and after drug/placebo use. Three participants under zopiclone use had intervention interrupted due to intense daytime sedation and worsened agitation with wandering. Zopiclone produced an 81 min increase in MNSD (95% confidence interval (CI): -0.8, 163.2), a 26 min reduction in WASO (95% CI: -56.2, 4.8) and a 2-episode decrease in awakening per night (95% CI: -4.0, 0.4) in average compared to placebo. Zolpidem yielded no significant difference in MNSD despite a significant 22 min reduction in WASO (95% CI: -52.5, 8.3) and a reduction of 1 awakening each night (95% CI: -3.4, 1.2) in relation to placebo. There was a 1-point reduction in mean performance in the symbols search test among zolpidem users (95% CI: -4.1, 1.5) and an almost eight-point reduction in average scores in the digit-symbol coding test among zopiclone users (95% CI: -21.7, 6.2). In summary, short-term use of zolpidem or zopiclone by older insomniacs with AD appears to be clinically helpful, even though safety and tolerance remain issues to be personalized in healthcare settings and further investigated in subsequent trials. This trial was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03075241.

Cognitive and balance dysfunctions due to the use of zolpidem in the elderly: a systematic review

Zolpidem is one of the most widely prescribed hypnotic (non-benzodiazepine) agents for sleep disorder. Recently, an increase in the demand for this drug has been observed, mainly in the elderly population.

Objective

This study aims to analyze the acute effect of zolpidem on cognitive and balance dysfunctions in the elderly population.

Methods

A study was conducted by two independent researchers in four virtual scientific information bases and included randomized controlled trials. The studies evaluated elderly patients using zolpidem. Cognitive and balance dysfunctions were analyzed.

Results

Six articles were included. The mean age of the participants in the studies was 69 years. The following zolpidem dosages were evaluated: 5, 6.25, 10, and 12.5 mg. Comparing zolpidem and placebo, relating to the cognitive dysfunctions, there is no statistically significant difference between the groups. However, in relation to balance dysfunctions, there is a statistically significant difference between the intervention and the comparison, favoring placebo.

Conclusions

Zolpidem, even in usual doses (5 mg and 10 mg), has shown to increase the risk for balance dysfunctions. However, this does not occur in relation to cognitive changes.

Impact of Pharmacotherapy on Insomnia in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease

Insomnia is a pervasive sleep disorder affecting numerous patients across diverse demographical populations and comorbid disease states. Contributing factors are often a complex interaction of biological, psychological, and social components, requiring a multifaceted approach in terms of both diagnosis and management. In the setting of Alzheimer’s disease, insomnia is an even more complicated issue, with a higher overall prevalence than in the general population, greater complexity of contributing etiologies, and differences in diagnosis (at times based on caregiver observation of sleep disruption rather than subjective complaints by the individual with the disorder), and requiring more discretion in terms of treatment, particularly in regard to adverse effect profile concerns. There also is growing evidence of the bidirectional nature of sleep disruption and Alzheimer’s disease, with insomnia potentially contributing to disease progression, making the condition even more paramount to address. The objective of this review was to provide the clinician with an overview of treatment strategies that may have value in the treatment of disturbed sleep in Alzheimer’s disease. Nonpharmacological approaches to treatment should be exhausted foremost; however, pharmacotherapy may be needed in certain clinical scenarios, which can be a challenge for clinicians given the paucity of evidence and guidelines for treatment in the subpopulation of Alzheimer’s disease. Agents such as sedating antidepressants, melatonin, and site-specific γ-aminobutyric acid agonists are often employed based on historical usage but are not necessarily supported by high-quality trials. Newer agents such as dual orexin receptor antagonists have demonstrated some promise but still need further evaluation.

Zopiclone to treat insomnia in older adults: A systematic review

Considering the global increase in use of Z-drugs to treat insomnia, the study objective was to conduct a systematic review on the efficacy and safety of zopiclone to treat sleep disorders in older adults compared to other sedative-hypnotics, to placebo or to non-pharmacological interventions. The literature search for original reports - clinical trials, cohort studies and cross-sectional, observational investigations - was done in eleven databases and web search engines followed PRISMA guidelines, and methodological quality was assessed using the Risk of Bias tool in the Cochrane Reviewers' Handbook. The search resulted in 12 randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials along with 2 open studies and 2 observational reports. Overall, the studies suggest that zopiclone is effective to treat insomnia by reducing sleep latency, nocturnal awakenings and wake time after sleep onset while increasing total sleep time, with probable effects on sleep architecture. Zopiclone was found to be fairly tolerated, to induce a low rate of adverse events with non-severe impact on psychomotor or cognitive performance and to produce no major harm to the overall well-being and daily living abilities. However, the quality of most studies was classified as low or unclear. Though the studies available support benefits from zopiclone use, there is still a need for further evidence on long-term effects, tolerability and safety in the treatment of older adults by means of high-quality trials.

Efficacy and safety of lemborexant in adults with insomnia: comparing Japanese and non-Japanese subgroups from the global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SUNRISE 2 study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Whether there are racial differences in the efficacy/safety of hypnotics has not been sufficiently investigated. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy/safety of lemborexant 5 mg and lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo once daily in a subset of Japanese patients with insomnia and to compare the results with those of non-Japanese patients.

METHODS

This subanalysis reports the results of the first 6 months (period 1, placebo-controlled) of SUNRISE 2, a 12-month, global, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study. Changes in patient-reported sleep onset latency, patient-reported sleep efficiency, and patient-reported wake after sleep onset with lemborexant 5 mg or lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo were evaluated. Treatment-emergent adverse events were evaluated for safety.

RESULTS

In total, 949 patients were randomized (Japanese, n = 161; non-Japanese, n = 788). Groups were balanced at baseline except for the male/female ratio (P = .0002) and body mass index (P < .0001) in the Japanese vs non-Japanese subgroups. Overall, the efficacy and safety of lemborexant were similar between subgroups. In the Japanese subgroup, the subjective sleep onset latency change from baseline was significant after 7 nights and 6 months with lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo, the subjective sleep efficiency change from baseline was significant after 7 nights with lemborexant 10 mg vs placebo, and the subjective wake after sleep onset change from baseline was significant at 6 months with lemborexant 5 mg vs placebo. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events were consistent between both subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

Lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg improved sleep onset and sleep maintenance over 6 months and was well-tolerated in both the Japanese and non-Japanese patients. The safety profiles of lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg were consistent between the subgroups.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; Name: Long-term Study of Lemborexant in Insomnia Disorder (SUNRISE 2); URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02952820; Identifier: NCT02952820; and Registry: ClinicalTrialsRegister.eu; Identifier: 2015-001463-39.

Prevalence and factors associated with use of sleeping pills among older adults in Brazil

OBJECTIVES

Little is known about sleeping pills consumption among older adults in low- and middle-income countries. This study investigated the prevalence and factors associated with sleeping pills use among Brazilians aged 50 and over.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted using baseline data from the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Aging (ELSI-Brazil), a nationally representative study of persons aged 50 years and older (n = 9412). Univariate and bivariate analyses were used to describe the sample. Robust Poisson regression was employed to estimate prevalence ratios and predict probabilities.

KEY FINDINGS

Prevalence of sleeping pills use among older Brazilians was estimated at 16.8%, with considerable disparities related to gender (22.3% among women and 10.3% among men), race/skin colour (19.7% among whites and 11.9% among blacks) and geographic region (ranging from 5.9% in the North to 20.5% in the South). The multivariate analysis showed associations between sleeping pills consumption and sociodemographic factors (age, gender, race/skin colour, geographic region and income), health status/behaviour characteristics (poor self-rated health status, number of chronic conditions and alcohol consumption) and variables related to healthcare utilisation (number of visits, usual source of care, care coordination, doctor's awareness of all medication, difficulty in managing own medication and number of medicines).

CONCLUSIONS

Our work found that sleeping pills consumption is disproportionately prevalent among women, is associated with worse health status and increases with more medical office visits and use of additional medicines. Moreover, the large inexplicable variations in care deserve special attention from policy-makers and clinicians.

Why Do They Fall? The Impact of Insomnia on Gait of Older Adults: A Case-Control Study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To compare gait and cognitive performance conducted separately as a single- (ST) and simultaneously as a dual-task (DT), ie, when a cognitive task was added, among community-dwelling older adults with and without insomnia.

METHODS

Participants included: 39 (28 females) community-dwelling older adults with insomnia, 34 (21 females) controls without insomnia. Subject groups were matched for age, gender, and education. Sleep quality was evaluated based on two-week actigraphy. Gait speed and cognition were assessed as ST and DT performance. DT costs (DTCs) were calculated for both tasks. Outcomes were compared via independent samples t-tests or Mann-Whitney U-tests.

RESULTS

Older adults with insomnia demonstrated significantly slower gait speed during ST (1 ± 0.29 vs 1.27 ± 0.17 m/s, p<0.001) and DT (0.77 ± 0.26 vs 1.14 ± 0.20 m/s, p<0.001) and fewer correct responses in the cognitive task during ST (21 ± 7 vs 27 ± 11, p=0.009) and DT (19 ± 7 vs 23 ± 9, p=0.015) compared to control group. DTC for the gait task was higher among older adults with insomnia (18.32%, IQR: 9.48-30.93 vs 7.81% IQR: 4.43-14.82, p<0.001). However, no significant difference was observed in DTC for the cognitive task (14.71%, IQR: -0.89-38.84 vs 15%, IQR: -0.89-38.84%, p=0.599).

CONCLUSION

Older adults with insomnia have lower gait speed and poorer cognitive performance during ST and DT and an inefficient pattern of task prioritization during walking, compared to counterparts without insomnia. These findings may explain the higher risk of falls among older adults with insomnia. Geriatric professionals should be aware of potential interrelationships between sleep and gait.