Resection or preservation of the metatarsal heads in rheumatoid forefoot surgery? A randomised clinical trial

Outcomes of Joint-Preserving Surgery for Forefoot Deformities in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

BACKGROUND

With the advent of effective disease-modifying medications, the surgical treatment of forefoot deformities in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has evolved from joint-sacrificing to joint-preserving surgery. However, it is unclear whether joint-preserving surgery is effective for the full range of metatarsophalangeal joint involvement. Hence, this study investigated the postoperative outcomes of joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities with a wide range of joint destruction.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included 68 feet from 68 patients with RA who underwent joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities between 2014 and 2020. The Larsen grade classification was used to assess the first metatarsophalangeal joint destruction and classify patients into 4 groups as follows: 0 and 1 (n = 14), 2 (n = 21), 3 (n = 19), and 4 and 5 (n = 14). The Self-Administered Foot and Ankle Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q) score, hallux valgus angle (HVA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) were determined before surgery and at the last follow-up visit.

RESULTS

The median observation duration was 40 (range, 24-78) months. SAFE-Q scores of all groups significantly improved in all subscales at the last observation, with no significant differences among the study groups. Radiographic evaluations of all groups revealed significant improvements in HVA and IMA after surgery, with no significant differences among the groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients using the surgical approaches described in this study, joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities led to satisfactory clinical and radiographic improvements, regardless of the severity of joint destruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, case-control study.

Developing a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: A scoping review and report from the OMERACT 2022 foot and ankle special interest group session

OBJECTIVES

Foot and ankle involvement is common in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, yet high-quality evidence assessing the effectiveness of treatments for these disorders is lacking. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Foot and Ankle Working Group is developing a core outcome set for use in clinical trials and longitudinal observational studies in this area.

METHODS

A scoping review was performed to identify outcome domains in the existing literature. Clinical trials and observational studies comparing pharmacological, conservative or surgical interventions involving adult participants with any foot or ankle disorder in the following rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) were eligible for inclusion: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), spondyloarthropathies, crystal arthropathies and connective tissue diseases. Outcome domains were categorised according to the OMERACT Filter 2.1.

RESULTS

Outcome domains were extracted from 150 eligible studies. Most studies included participants with foot/ankle OA (63% of studies) or foot/ankle involvement in RA (29% of studies). Foot/ankle pain was the outcome domain most commonly measured (78% of studies), being the most frequently specified outcome domain across all RMDs. There was considerable heterogeneity in the other outcome domains measured, across core areas of manifestations (signs, symptoms, biomarkers), life impact, and societal/resource use. The group's progress to date, including findings from the scoping review, was presented and discussed during a virtual OMERACT Special Interest Group (SIG) in October 2022. During this meeting, feedback was sought amongst delegates regarding the scope of the core outcome set, and feedback was received on the next steps of the project, including focus group and Delphi methods.

CONCLUSION

Findings from the scoping review and feedback from the SIG will contribute to the development of a core outcome set for foot and ankle disorders in RMDs. The next steps are to determine which outcome domains are important to patients, followed by a Delphi exercise with key stakeholders to prioritise outcome domains.

Non-drug and surgical treatment algorithm and recommendations for the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis-secondary publication

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to update the Japan College of Rheumatology (JCR) clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and prepare an algorithm for non-drug and surgical treatments. This article is a digest version of the guidelines.

METHODS

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare's research group, in collaboration with the JCR, used the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation method to update the 2014 JCR CPG for RA. The consensus was formed by CPG panel members.

RESULTS

We raised 19 clinical questions regarding non-drug and surgical treatments for RA and developed recommendations. The treatments included exercise therapy; occupational therapy; joint injection of corticosteroids; and orthopaedic surgeries including cervical spine surgery, wrist and foot arthroplasty, ankle arthrodesis, and replacement arthroplasty of the shoulder, elbow, finger, hip, knee, and ankle. Recommendations regarding the risks of surgery and perioperative discontinuation of medications have also been developed. Based on these recommendations, we created an original algorithm for the non-drug and surgical treatment of RA.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations are expected to serve rheumatologists, health care professionals, and patients with RA as tools for shared decision-making to treat residual limb joint symptoms and functional impairment.

Outcome after resection arthroplasty or shortening oblique osteotomy of the lesser metatarsals combined with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint for severe rheumatoid forefoot deformities

PURPOSE

We investigated objective and patient-reported outcomes after resection arthroplasty or shortening oblique osteotomy (SOO) of the lesser metatarsals combined with arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint for severe rheumatoid forefoot deformities.

METHODS

17 feet from 14 women (mean age, 67.8 years) underwent resection arthroplasty of the lesser metatarsal heads (MTH resection group), while 13 feet from nine women and two men (mean age, 68.7 years) underwent SOO of the lesser metatarsals (MTH preservation group). Arthrodesis of the first MTP joint was performed in all cases. Mean follow-up in the MTH resection and preservation groups was 25.0 and 21.3 months, respectively. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluation included Japanese Society for Surgery of the Foot (JSSF) scale and self-administered foot evaluation questionnaire (SAFE-Q) scores.

RESULTS

Mean total JSSF scale significantly improved from 53.4 to 76.4 in the MTH resection group (p < .001) and from 50.1 to 74.2 in the MTH preservation group (p = .002). Pain and pain-related and shoe-related SAFE-Q subscale scores significantly improved after surgery in both groups. In the MTH resection group, recurrence of painful callosities and claw toe deformity was observed in four and three feet, respectively. In the MTH preservation group, one patient experienced recurrence of painful callosities and one underwent revision surgery for IP joint dislocation.

CONCLUSION

Resection arthroplasty or SOO of the lesser metatarsals combined with arthrodesis of the first MTP joint achieved significant improvement with respect to pain relief, deformity correction, and footwear comfort.

Unterschiede in der Therapie entzündlich rheumatischer und degenerativer Füße. Die Vorfußchirurgie

Der Unterschied zwischen rheumatischen und degenerativen Veränderungen am Fuß liegt in der fortschreitenden Destruktion der Gelenke bei persistierender Synovialitis der rheumatoiden Arthritis (RA). Unter der heute wirksameren immunsuppressiven Therapie und eines frühen und aggressiven Beginns zeigen sich mildere Verlaufsformen. So können zunehmend auch gelenkerhaltende Verfahren der Vorfußchirurgie Anwendung finden. Entscheidend ist hier jedoch die Remission mit sicherer Krankheitskontrolle für den gelenkerhaltenden Eingriff. Dennoch ist das Rezidiv- und Fehlstellungsrisiko aufgrund wiederkehrender arthritischer Phasen höher. Rheumaorthopädische Standardverfahren, wie die Arthrodese des Großzehengrundgelenkes mit Resektion der Metatarsaleköpfchen haben aber Ihren Stellenwert beim Vollbild des erosiven rheumatischen Vorfußes nicht verloren. Ein standardisiertes Vorgehen fehlt. Umso wichtiger ist es, mit jedem Patienten individuell die richtigen Maßnahmen zu festzulegen.

Joint-Preserving Surgery for Forefoot Deformities in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Literature Review

The combination of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty of all lesser metatarsal heads has been historically considered the golden standard treatment for rheumatoid forefoot deformities. However, as recent improved management of rheumatoid arthritis have reduced progression of joint destruction, the surgical treatments for rheumatoid forefoot deformities have gradually changed from joint-sacrificing surgery, such as arthrodesis and resection arthroplasty, to joint-preserving surgery. The aim of this literature review was to provide current evidence for joint-preserving surgery for rheumatoid forefoot deformities. We focused on the indications, specific outcomes, and postsurgical complications of joint-preserving surgery in this review.

Patient-Reported and Radiographic Outcomes of Joint-Preserving Surgery for Rheumatoid Forefoot Deformities: A Retrospective Case Series with Mean Follow-up of 6 Years

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disorder and a chronic inflammatory disease that can damage joints throughout the body. As dramatic improvements in medical treatment have contributed to reduced progression of joint destruction, surgical methods for the treatment of RA-related forefoot deformities have gradually changed from joint-sacrificing to joint-preserving. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes, including patient-reported outcomes, of joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities associated with RA.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 105 feet in 89 patients with RA who were treated during the period of January 2012 to May 2015 and had a minimum of 5 years of follow-up (mean, 6.0 ± 0.9 years). The patient-reported outcome measure used was the Self-Administered Foot Evaluation Questionnaire (SAFE-Q), which was completed preoperatively and at the latest follow-up (n = 53 feet). The hallux valgus angle (HVA), the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and the position of the medial sesamoid were measured preoperatively, at 3 months postoperatively, and at the latest follow-up. Cases of delayed wound-healing, hallux valgus recurrence, nonunion at the osteotomy sites, and reoperation were recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to determine the estimated survivorship, with reoperation as the end point.

RESULTS

Scores of all 5 subscales of the SAFE-Q demonstrated significant improvement at the latest follow-up. The average HVA and IMA decreased significantly 3 months postoperatively, and these measurements remained significantly lower than the preoperative values (p < 0.01). The position of the medial sesamoid at the latest follow-up improved significantly (p < 0.01). Delayed wound-healing was found at the site of surgery in 21 (20.0%) of the 105 feet. Recurrence of hallux valgus was observed in 11 (10.5%) of the feet. There was no case of nonunion at any osteotomy site. Eleven (10.5%) of the feet required reoperation. The estimated survivorship of the studied joint-preserving surgery at 7 years, with reoperation as the end point, was 89.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Satisfactory long-term patient-reported and radiographic outcomes after joint-preserving surgery for forefoot deformities associated with RA can be achieved.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Forefoot Reconstruction Following Metatarsal Head Resection Arthroplasty With a Plantar Approach-A 20-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) can cause significant forefoot disorders. If forefoot deformity and pain are severe, surgical treatment can be considered. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term outcomes of surgical forefoot correction per Tillmann, which involves resection of the metatarsal heads through a transverse plantar approach for the lesser toes and a dorsomedial approach to the great toe.

METHODS

This retrospective study used patient-based questionnaires to analyze the revision rate, pain, use of orthoses, walking ability, forefoot function, and patient satisfaction of patients with RA who had undergone a complete forefoot correction of metatarsophalangeal (MTP) I to V. The study only included participants with RA before the era of biological agents and who were at least 20 years postoperatively. A total of 60 patients who had undergone 100 complete forefoot operations according to Tillmann 24.6 ± 3.5 years ago were included in this study.

RESULTS

The data collected showed that 35 reoperations were performed on 26 of the patients. Deformity relapses were often documented for the hallux valgus. More than 60% of the patients were able to wear conventional shoes. The distances the participants were able to walk were significantly increased by wearing shoes when compared with walking barefoot (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

While forefoot function remained difficult to assess, the majority of patients were able to use conventional shoes. This long-term follow-up study of patient-reported questionnaires completed more than 20 years after the Tillmann procedure showed that more than 80% of the patients remained satisfied with the outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective cohort study.