Proximal Supination Osteotomy of the First Metatarsal for Hallux Valgus

A Cadaveric Study Verifying the Potential of a Rotational Biplanar Chevron Osteotomy to Correct the 3-Dimensional Hallux Valgus Deformity

INTRODUCTION

Metatarsal pronation is present in 87% of patients with hallux valgus (HV) deformity. The chevron osteotomy is commonly used worldwide to correct mild to moderate HV deformities. Many modifications have been described, but few address the rotational deformity of the first metatarsal. The rotational biplanar chevron osteotomy (RBCO), described by M. Prado et al, presents a variation of a biplanar chevron osteotomy that can be used to address first metatarsal rotation. The objective of this study is to investigate and verify the technique of the RBCO.

METHODS

We conducted our study performing an RBCO on 9 cadaveric limbs. The technique uses a medial-based wedge parallel to the plantar limb of the osteotomy to make the distal fragment free to correct rotation. A goniometer was used by 2 individual surgeons to control the rotational correction achieved.

RESULTS

The osteotomy was considered simple to perform and we experienced no complications, such as fractures or instability. The result was satisfactory alignment and adequate stability. On average, a 2 mm wedge resulted in 11° of rotational correction.

CONCLUSION

We predict that RBCO can safely be used for correcting the metatarsal rotation when necessary in mild to moderate HV deformity foot.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A modified minimally invasive osteotomy for hallux valgus enables reduction of malpositioned sesamoid bones

BACKGROUND

The current minimally invasive distal metatarsal osteotomy for hallux valgus (HV) is V-shaped, which prevents the correction of the rotational metatarsal head deformity and reduction of the sesamoid bones. We sought to determine the optimal method for sesamoid bone reduction during HV surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 53 patients who underwent HV surgery between 2017 and 2019 using one of three techniques: open chevron osteotomy (n = 19), minimally invasive V-shaped osteotomy (n = 18), and a modified straight minimally invasive osteotomy (n = 16). The sesamoid position was graded using the Hardy and Clapham method on weight-bearing radiographs.

RESULTS

When compared to open chevron and V-shaped osteotomies, the modified osteotomy resulted in significantly lower postoperative sesamoid position scores (3.74 ± 1.48, 4.61 ± 1.09, and 1.44 ± 0.81, respectively, P < 0.001). Furthermore, the mean change in postoperative sesamoid position score was greater (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The modified minimally invasive osteotomy was superior to the other two techniques in correcting HV deformity in all planes, including sesamoid reduction.

Pronation on weightbearing radiographs does not correlate with pronation from weightbearing CT scans

INTRODUCTION

In hallux valgus (HV), first metatarsal pronation is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of the deformity. The purpose of this study was to compare pronation in HV patients determined from the shape of the lateral head of the first metatarsal on AP weightbearing radiographs with pronation calculated from weightbearing CT (WBCT) scans.

METHODS

Patients were included in this study if they had preoperative and 5-month postoperative WBCT scans and corresponding weightbearing AP radiographs of the affected foot. Pronation of the first metatarsal on WBCT scans was measured using a 3D CAD model and the alpha angle and categorized into four groups on radiographs. Association between pronation groups on radiographs and WBCT scans was determined using Spearman correlation coefficients (r_s) and by comparing mean WBCT pronation of the first metatarsal between plain radiograph pronation groups.

RESULTS

Agreement between the two observers' pronation on radiographs was good (k = 0.634) and moderate (k = 0.501), respectively. There was no correlation between radiographic pronation and the 3D CAD model (r_s < 0.15). Preoperatively, there was weak correlation between the alpha angle and the radiographic pronation groups (r_s = 0.371, P = 0.048) although this relationship did not hold postoperatively (r_s = 0.330, P = 0.081). There was no difference in mean pronation calculated on WBCT scans between the plain radiographic groups.

CONCLUSION

Pronation of the first metatarsal measured on weightbearing AP radiographs had moderate interobserver agreement and was only weakly associated with pronation measured from WBCT scans. These results suggest that first metatarsal pronation measured on weightbearing radiographs is not a substitute for pronation measured on WBCT scans.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, retrospective cohort study.

Prevalence and radiological characteristics of the dislocation of the second metatarsophalangeal joint in patients undergoing hallux valgus surgery; a matched control study

BACKGROUND

Hallux valgus (HV) is occasionally associated with chronic subluxation or dislocation (CS/D) of the second metatarsophalangeal joint (2MTPj). The present study aimed to radiographically investigate the prevalence and characteristics of HV with CS/D of the 2MTPj compared with matched controls.

METHODS

Dorsoplantar and lateral weight-bearing radiographs of 79 female patients (79 feet) who had HV with an age of 50 years or more were reviewed. All feet were treated with a proximal supination osteotomy for correction of HV. CS/D of the 2MTPj was evaluated on preoperative dorsoplantar and lateral radiographs. HV and intermetatarsal (IM) angles were measured. Seventy-nine feet were divided into two groups: Group CD (16 feet) had HV with CS/D of the 2MTPj, and Group non-CD had HV without the CS/D of the 2MTPj (63 feet). The severity of HV was divided into two grades according to the HV angle: moderate deformity (Group M, 36 feet, HV angle of less than 40°) and severe deformity (Group S, 43 feet, HV angle of 40° or greater). Group CD and non-CD, and Group M and S were matched by age, gender, and BMI.

RESULTS

The prevalence of CS/D of the 2MTPj was 20.3%. Group CD had a significantly higher HV angle (p = 0.0001) and a significantly higher IM angle (p = 0.042) than Group non-CD. The prevalence of CS/D of the 2MTPj in Group S (34.9%) were significantly higher than that in Group M (2.8%) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CS/D of the 2MTPj was significantly associated with greater HV and IM angles compared with matched controls. The prevalence of CS/D of the 2MTPj (34.9%) in Group S was significantly higher than that in Group M. Severe HV can be at higher risk of acquiring CS/D of the 2MTPj in middle-aged and older females.

Management of the Tarsometatarsal Joint in the Rotational Correction of Hallux Valgus by the Modified Lapidus Procedure: Intraoperative Technical Tips to Prevent Complications

The modified Lapidus procedure is considered a useful tool for correction of multiplanar deformities in the hallux valgus, including first metatarsal pronation. It offers a greater power of correction compared to most other osteotomies. However, postoperative complications can occur in up to 12% of cases. The aim of this study was to describe intraoperative technical tips in the management of the tarsometatarsal joint during multiplanar correction of severe hallux valgus deformity using the modified Lapidus procedure. It is not the authors' intention to describe a new technique, but to draw attention to intraoperative details in order to prevent complications as nonunion, extension of the first metatarsal and undercorrection of the deformity. Rotational correction of the first metatarsal with adequate bone coaptation of the first metatarsal and the medial cuneiform are the cornerstone for a satisfactory result.Levels of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

First Metatarsal Rotation in Hallux Valgus Deformity

Rotation of the first metatarsal (M1) as a potential etiological factor of hallux valgus (HV) deformity was described relatively early in the description of HV pathoanatomy. However, because biplanar radiographs have been the standard method for imaging HV, clinicians primarily developed measurement methods and corrective operations confined to 2 dimensions, medial-lateral and inferior-superior. Recently, as our understanding of HV pathoanatomy has further developed, aided in part by advanced imaging technology, M1 rotation about its axis ("axial rotation") and its implications for HV deformity and treatment has reemerged. The goal of this review is to summarize M1 rotation in HV from a historical perspective, to present the current understanding of its potential role in the etiology/pathogenesis of HV, and to summarize relevant imaging and operative considerations with respect to M1 rotation.Level of Evidence: Level III, systematic review.

Does preoperative deformity diminish radiographic outcome after hallux valgus correction with scarf osteotomy?: A retrospective study of 102 cases

BACKGROUND

Scarf osteotomy is a frequently used technique to correct moderate to severe hallux valgus deformities. Recurrence of a deformity is a commonly reported complication after surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative deformity on radiological outcome in terms of postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy.

METHODS

102 patients, in which a hallux valgus deformity was corrected with an isolated scarf osteotomy were included. Weightbearing radiographs were analyzed preoperatively, postoperatively, after 6 weeks and after three months (mean 10.9 months SD 17.2 months). The following radiological parameters were used for analysis: the intermetatarsal angle (IMA), the hallux valgus angle (HVA), the distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA), position of the sesamoids, first metatarsal length, and first metatarsophalangeal joint congruity.

RESULTS

Significant correction of IMA, HVA, DMAA, sesamoid position and joint congruity was achieved (p < 0.001). The IMA improved from 15.8 ± 2.3 to 4.3 ± 2.8°, the HVA from 32.6 ± 6.8 to 9.1 ± 7.2, and the DMAA from 11.4 ± 6.9 to 8.4 ± 5.2°, respectively. In contrast to DMAA, throughout followup we could detect loss of correction for HVA and for IMA amounting 6.3° ± 5.8 and 3.8° ± 2.8 respectively. Loss of HVA correction revealed a significant correlation with preoperative DMAA, but not with the other preoperative radiological parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative deformity does not correlate with postoperative loss of correction after scarf osteotomy, except DMAA.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results may be helpful in counseling patients regarding recurrence of hallux valgus deformity after scarf osteotomy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level IV, retrospective case series.

Rotational biplanar Chevron osteotomy

INTRODUCTION

The Chevron osteotomy is a reliable and popular osteotomy for treating hallux valgus worldwide. Many modifications have been described, but none of them address the rotational deformity of the first metatarsal. The objective of this study is to describe a variation of biplanar Chevron osteotomy which can address first metatarsal rotation when necessary.

METHODS

The indications for the Rotational Biplanar Chevron Osteotomy (RBCO) are mild to moderate hallux valgus deformity associated with hallux pronation related to internal rotation of the first metatarsal bone. We describe a technique that uses a medial based wedge parallel to the plantar limb of the osteotomy in order to make the distal fragment free to correct rotation.

RESULTS

The more recent concern about hallux valgus surgery is the very interesting concept that this deformity really occurs in three different planes, and we may have mistreated the rotation component with our current techniques. Many authors have revisited many common techniques in order to adapt them to correct metatarsal pronation. To our best knowledge, this is the first paper to describe a modification of the Chevron osteotomy to address the rotation of the first metatarsal.

CONCLUSION

We can conclude that the rotational biplanar Chevron osteotomy can be an useful tool in the treatment of mild hallux valgus associated with metatarsal pronation.