Imidacloprid does not induce Cyp genes involved in insecticide resistance of a mutant Drosophila melanogaster line

Xenobiotic responses of Drosophila melanogaster to insecticides with different modes of action and entry

Depending on their chemical structure, insecticides enter the insect body either through the cuticle or by ingestion (mode of entry [MoE]), and, naturally, harm or even kill insects through different mechanisms (modes of action). In parallel, they trigger a systemic detoxification response, especially by activation of detoxification gene expression. We monitored the acute genetic alterations of known xenobiotic response target genes against five different insecticides with two most common MoEs (contact toxicity and stomach toxicity), found that: 1. only a few genes were detected responding to acute exposure to insecticides (LD₉₀ ); 2. The expression of cyp12d1 was upregulated in all experiments, except for dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane exposure, suggesting that cyp12d1 is a general first response gene of the xenobiotic response; 3. The contact and stomach entries did not show any notable difference, both MoEs induced the response of JNK signaling pathway, possibly serving as the driver of the response of cyp12d1 and a few other genes. In conclusion, the changes in gene expression levels were relatively modest and no significant differences were found between the two MoEs, so the insecticide entry route does not seem to have an impact on the detoxification response. However, the two MoEs of the same insecticide showed different efficiencies in our test. Thus, the study of these two MoEs will help to develop more efficient release and management methods for the use of such insecticides.

Over-expression of CYP6A2 is associated with spirotetramat resistance and cross-resistance in the resistant strain of Aphis gossypii Glover

A laboratory-selected spirotetramat-resistant strain (SR) of cotton aphid developed 579-fold and 15-fold resistance to spirotetramat in adult aphids and 3rd instar nymphs, respectively, compared with a susceptible strain (SS) [26]. The SR strain developed high-level cross-resistance to alpha-cypermethrin and bifenthrin and very low or no cross-resistance to the other tested insecticides. Synergist piperonyl butoxide (PBO) dramatically increased the toxicity of spirotetramat and alpha-cypermethrin in the resistant strain. RT-qPCR results demonstrated that the transcriptional levels of CYP6A2 increased significantly in the SR strain compared with the SS strain, which was consistent with the transcriptome results [30]. The depletion of CYP6A2 transcripts by RNAi also significantly increased the sensitivity of the resistant aphid to spirotetramat and alpha-cypermethrin. These results indicate the possible involvement of CYP6A2 in spirotetramat resistance and alpha-cypermethrin cross-resistance in the cotton aphid. These together with other cross-resistance results have implications for the successful implementation of resistance management strategies for Aphis gossypii.

Spirotetramat resistance adaption analysis of Aphis gossypii Glover by transcriptomic survey

A resistant strain of the cotton aphid (SR) developed 441.26-fold and 11.97-fold resistance to spirotetramat for adult aphids and nymphs, respectively, compared with the susceptible (SS) strain. Solexa sequencing technology was employed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in the spirotetramat-resistant cotton aphid. Respective totals of 22,430,522 and 21,317,732 clean reads were obtained from SR and SS cDNA libraries and assembled into 35,222 non-redundant (Nr) consensus sequences. A total of 14,913, 9,220, 7,922, 4,314 and 4,686 sequences were annotated using Nr, Swiss-Prot, Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) and Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG), respectively. Compared with the SS strain, the SR strain had 1287 significantly changed unigenes, of which 130 genes were up-regulated and 1157 genes were down-regulated (P ≤ 0.001). Among these genes, 440 unigenes were annotated, consisting of 114 up-regulated and 326 down-regulated genes. The expression levels of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and UDP-glucuronosyltransferase were significantly up-regulated in the SR strain compared to the SS strain. The genes encoding cuticle proteins, salivary glue protein, fibroin heavy chain, energy ATP synthase, and cytochrome c oxidase were dramatically decreased. Among the DEGs, cytochrome P450 6A2 (c20965.graph_c0) was the only P450 gene up-regulated in the SR strain. The expression levels of 10 DEGs were confirmed by real-time qPCR, and the trends in gene expression observed by qPCR matched those of the Solexa expression profiles. The acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) genes in the SR and SS libraries both contain four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), with three common SNPs: 1227 (C/T), 1811 (A/T: F/Y) and 3759 (C/T); however, 7540 (A/T) and 108 (G/A) occurred solely in the SS and SR strains, respectively.

Effects of neonicotinoids and fipronil on non-target invertebrates

We assessed the state of knowledge regarding the effects of large-scale pollution with neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on non-target invertebrate species of terrestrial, freshwater and marine environments. A large section of the assessment is dedicated to the state of knowledge on sublethal effects on honeybees (Apis mellifera) because this important pollinator is the most studied non-target invertebrate species. Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths), Lumbricidae (earthworms), Apoidae sensu lato (bumblebees, solitary bees) and the section "other invertebrates" review available studies on the other terrestrial species. The sections on freshwater and marine species are rather short as little is known so far about the impact of neonicotinoid insecticides and fipronil on the diverse invertebrate fauna of these widely exposed habitats. For terrestrial and aquatic invertebrate species, the known effects of neonicotinoid pesticides and fipronil are described ranging from organismal toxicology and behavioural effects to population-level effects. For earthworms, freshwater and marine species, the relation of findings to regulatory risk assessment is described. Neonicotinoid insecticides exhibit very high toxicity to a wide range of invertebrates, particularly insects, and field-realistic exposure is likely to result in both lethal and a broad range of important sublethal impacts. There is a major knowledge gap regarding impacts on the grand majority of invertebrates, many of which perform essential roles enabling healthy ecosystem functioning. The data on the few non-target species on which field tests have been performed are limited by major flaws in the outdated test protocols. Despite large knowledge gaps and uncertainties, enough knowledge exists to conclude that existing levels of pollution with neonicotinoids and fipronil resulting from presently authorized uses frequently exceed the lowest observed adverse effect concentrations and are thus likely to have large-scale and wide ranging negative biological and ecological impacts on a wide range of non-target invertebrates in terrestrial, aquatic, marine and benthic habitats.