Characterisation and validation of an in vitro transactivation assay based on the 22Rv1/MMTV_GR-KO cell line to detect human androgen receptor agonists and antagonists

Avoiding a reproducibility crisis in regulatory toxicology-on the fundamental role of ring trials

The ongoing transition from chemical hazard and risk assessment based on animal studies to assessment relying mostly on non-animal data, requires a multitude of novel experimental methods, and this means that guidance on the validation and standardisation of test methods intended for international applicability and acceptance, needs to be updated. These so-called new approach methodologies (NAMs) must be applicable to the chemical regulatory domain and provide reliable data which are relevant to hazard and risk assessment. Confidence in and use of NAMs will depend on their reliability and relevance, and both are thoroughly assessed by validation. Validation is, however, a time- and resource-demanding process. As updates on validation guidance are conducted, the valuable components must be kept: Reliable data are and will remain fundamental. In 2016, the scientific community was made aware of the general crisis in scientific reproducibility-validated methods must not fall into this. In this commentary, we emphasize the central importance of ring trials in the validation of experimental methods. Ring trials are sometimes considered to be a major hold-up with little value added to the validation. Here, we clarify that ring trials are indispensable to demonstrate the robustness and reproducibility of a new method. Further, that methods do fail in method transfer and ring trials due to different stumbling blocks, but these provide learnings to ensure the robustness of new methods. At the same time, we identify what it would take to perform ring trials more efficiently, and how ring trials fit into the much-needed update to the guidance on the validation of NAMs.

Interlaboratory prevalidation of a new in vitro transcriptional activation assay for the screening of (anti-)androgenic activity of chemicals using the UALH-hAR cell line

We report an interlaboratory evaluation of a recently developed androgen receptor (AR) transactivation assay using the UALH-hAR reporter cell line that stably expresses the luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of androgen receptor elements (AREs) with no glucocorticoid receptor (GR) crosstalk. Herein, a two-step prevalidation study involving three laboratories was conducted to assess performance criteria of the method such as transferability as well as robustness, sensitivity, and specificity. The first step consisted in the validation of the transfer of the cell line to participant laboratories through the testing of three reference chemicals: the AR agonist dihydrotestosterone, the AR antagonist hydroxyflutamide and the glucocorticoid dexamethasone. Secondly, a blinded study was conducted by screening a selection of ten chemicals, including four AR agonists, five AR antagonists, and one non-active chemical. All test compounds yielded the same activity profiles in all laboratories. The logEC₅₀ (agonist assay) or logIC₅₀ (antagonist assay) were in the same range, with intra-laboratory coefficients of variation (CVs) of 0.1-3.4% and interlaboratory CVs of 1-4%, indicating very good within- and between-laboratory reproducibility. Our results were consistent with literature and regulatory data (OECD TG458). Overall, this interlaboratory study demonstrated that the UALH-hAR assay is transferable, produces reliable, accurate and specific (anti)androgenic activity of chemicals, and can be considered for further regulatory validation.

Azole pesticide products and their hepatic metabolites cause endocrine disrupting potential by suppressing the homo-dimerization of human estrogen receptor alpha

We selected azole pesticides products that are managed by setting maximum residue limits (MRLs) in the Republic of Korea and describe the estrogen receptor (ER) α-related negative effect to endocrine system using in vitro Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development performance-based test guideline. No azoles were found to be an ERα agonist. Conversely, three azoles (bitertanol, cafenstrole, and tebufenpyrad) were determined to be ERα antagonists. In addition, the ERα antagonistic activities of bitertanol, cafenstrole, and tebufenpyrad were not significantly perturbed in the existence of phase I (hydroxylation, dealkylation, oxidation or reduction) and phase II (conjugation). Regarding the mechanism underlying their ERα-mediated endocrine disrupting potentials, ERα proteins cannot be translocated to the nucleus by suppressing the dimerization of ERα in the cytoplasm by bitertanol, cafenstrole, and tebufenpyrad. These data indicated that azole pesticide products show the capability to interfere the ERα-related human endocrine system. Furthermore, we identified the mechanism of ERα-mediated endocrine disrupting by azole insecticide products through this study.

Reliability of the AR-CALUX® in Vitro method used to detect chemicals with (anti)androgen activity: results of an international ring trial

The AR-CALUX^® in vitro method is a reporter gene-based transactivation method where endocrine active chemicals with androgenic or anti-androgenic potential can be detected. Its primary purpose is for screening chemicals for further prioritization and providing mechanistic (endocrine mode of action) information, as defined by the Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) conceptual framework for the testing and assessment of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. This article describes the conduct and results of an international ring trial with 3 EU-NETVAL laboratories and the test method developer. It was organized by EURL ECVAM to validate the method by testing 46 chemicals. A very good reproducibility within and between laboratories was concluded (94.7–100% and 100% concordance of classification) with low within and between laboratory variability (less than 2.5% CV on EC₅₀ values). Moreover, the variability is within the range of other validated, mechanistically similar methods. In comparison to the AR-reference list compiled by ICCVAM, an almost 100% concordance of classifications was obtained. This method allows the detection of the agonist and antagonist properties of a chemical. A specificity control test was developed during the validation study and added to the antagonist assay rendering the assay more specific. A comparison is made with the mechanistically similar methods AR-EcoScreen™ and 22Rv1/MMTV GR-KO TA. The AR-CALUX^® method was approved for inclusion in the recently updated OECD test guideline TG458 which incorporates all 3 methods.