Conventional testicular sperm extraction combined with the microdissection technique in nonobstructive azoospermic patients: a prospective comparative study

Parameters affecting the success rate of microscopic testicular sperm extraction in male patients with a solitary testis and non-obstructive azoospermia

PURPOSE

We aimed to compare the success rate of spermatozoa retrieval through microscopic testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) in non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) men with a solitary testis with that of mTESE in NOA men with bilateral testes and the parameters affecting these rates.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study of factors contributing to infertility in NOA patients with a solitary testis and men with bilateral testes was carried out. In this multicenter study, 74 patients with NOA with a solitary testis were matched with 74 patients with bilateral testes in terms of age, duration of infertility, and volume of the solitary testis from 2770 patients with NOA with bilateral testes. Hormonal parameters, presence of varicocele, history of varicocelectomy, history of undescended testis and karyotype analysis results were compared.

RESULTS

Spermatozoa were obtained from 40 (54.1%) patients with a solitary testis and 42 (56.76%) patients with bilateral testes. No differences were found regarding age, duration of infertility, or mean testicular volume between patients with a solitary testis and patients with bilateral testes. When serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were compared regardless of sperm retrieval status, it was observed that both levels were greater in the group of patients with a solitary testis (p < 0.01). Patients with solitary and bilateral testes from whom spermatozoa were obtained had larger testes than those from whom spermatozoa could not be obtained (p < 0.05). Similarly, the serum levels of FSH and LH were significantly greater in patients with a solitary testis than in those with bilateral testes (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study in the literature to evaluate the parameters that influence mTESE outcome in NOA patients with a solitary testis and NOA patients with bilateral testes. Greater testicular volume was found to positively affect spermatozoa retrieval for patients with a solitary testis. The higher levels of FSH and LH in patients with a solitary testis than in patients with bilateral testes of similar testicular volume may be due to a compensatory mechanism developed by the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis. The fact that these hormones are higher in patients with a solitary testis does not mean that the number of spermatozoa obtained through mTESE will be decreased.

Sperm retrieval rate and patient factors in azoospermia factor c microdeletion azoospermia: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To reveal the overall sperm retrieval rate (SRR) and range in patients with azoospermia factor c (AZFc) microdeletion azoospermia by microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) and discuss the differences of preoperative patient factors among studies with various SRRs.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We searched PubMed, Web of Science and Embase until February 2023. All studies reporting SRRs by mTESE and required parameters of patients with AZFc microdeletions were included. The primary outcome was the SRR and, if available, the pregnancy rate (PR) and live-birth rate (LBR) after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were also investigated as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

Eventually 11 cohort studies were included in this review. A total number of 441 patients underwent mTESE and in 275 of them sperm was obtained, reaching an overall SRR of 62.4%. The SRRs among studies had a wide range from 25.0% to 85.7%. The studies reporting higher SRRs generally had older mean ages, and higher follicle-stimulating hormone and testosterone levels. Only four studies provided practical data on pregnancies and live-born children of patients with AZFc microdeletions, so the overall PR and LBR were unavailable.

CONCLUSIONS

The overall SRR of patients with AZFc microdeletion azoospermia was 62.4%. The effect of patient factors in SR needs further evidence in future work.

Ex vivo microscopic testicular sperm extraction at the time of radical orchiectomy in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA): a scoping review

Testicular tumor is the most common solid malignancy in males under 40 years of age. This malignancy is known to have a negative impact on male fertility. Therefore, several techniques for sperm retrieval have been proposed, including microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). The objective of this study was to review the literature on the outcomes of oncological (Onco)-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy. We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Controlled Register of Trials. Only studies reporting ex vivo mTESE in patients with testicular tumor were considered. Twelve papers met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Tumor size was identified as the sole preoperative factor influencing spermatogenesis. The considered studies demonstrated a satisfactory success rate for Onco-mTESE, associated with a similarly valid percentage of live healthy births through assisted reproductive technology. Currently, no comparison has been made between Onco-mTESE and conventional Onco-TESE, hence further assessment is required. In cases where the tumor completely replaces the cancer-bearing testicle, a contralateral micro-TESE may be a viable alternative. However, the surgeon should evaluate associated risks and benefits preoperatively. In conclusion, Onco-mTESE at the time of radical orchiectomy appears to be a promising therapeutic option for young patients with testicular tumors. Nevertheless, additional studies are necessary to achieve a definitive conclusion.

Predictors of successful salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) after failed initial TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There has been no systematic review and meta-analysis to analyze and summarize the predictive factors of successful sperm extraction in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to investigate the factors predicting the result of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who failed the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for literature that described the characteristics of patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failing the initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction or conventional testicular sperm extraction published prior to June 2022.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included four retrospective studies with 332 patients with non-obstructive azoospermia who underwent a failed initial microdissection testicular sperm extraction and three retrospective studies with 177 non-obstructive azoospermia patients who underwent a failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. The results were as follows: among non-obstructive azoospermia patients whose first surgery was microdissection testicular sperm extraction, younger patients (standard mean difference: -0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55 to -0.01) and those with smaller bilateral testicular volume (standard mean difference: -0.55, 95% CI: -0.95 to -0.15), lower levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (standard mean difference: -0.86, 95% CI: -1.18 to -0.54) and luteinizing hormone (standard mean difference: -0.68, 95% CI: -1.16 to -0.19), and whose testicular histological type was hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 3.52, 95% CI: 1.30-9.53) were more likely to retrieve spermatozoa successfully, while patients with Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (odds ratio: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.24-0.73) were more likely to fail again in salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Additionally, in patients who underwent salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after a failed initial conventional testicular sperm extraction, those with testicular histological type of hypospermatogenesis (odds ratio: 30.35, 95% CI: 8.27-111.34) were more likely to be successful, while those with maturation arrest (odds ratio: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.18-0.83) rarely benefited.

CONCLUSION

We found that age, testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, hypospermatogenesis, Sertoli-cell-only syndrome, and maturation arrest were valuable predictors of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction, which will assist andrologists in clinical decision-making and minimize unnecessary injury to patients.

Comparison of unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a prospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare sperm retrieval rates between unilateral and bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) procedures in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia and to contribute to the literature by comparing them with literature data.

METHODS

This prospective study included 84 males with primary infertility who had azoospermic NOA, who had been married for at least one year, and whose female partners did not have a history of infertility. The study was conducted between January 2019 and January 2020. MD-TESE was applied bilaterally to 48% (n:41) (Group 1) and unilaterally to 52% (n:43) (Group 2) of the patients, and sperm retrieval rates were compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between Group 1 patients and Group 2 patients in terms of sperm availability (61%, 56.5%, p=0.495, respectively). In addition, while no complications were observed in unilateral MD-TESEs, 3 complications were observed in bilateral MD-TESEs.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, it was determined that there was no significant difference between the groups in terms of sperm availability in patients with NOA. Considering the operative time and complication rates of bilateral MD-TESE in patients diagnosed with NOA and the possible MD-TESE procedures that may be performed later, we believe that unilateral MD TESE is a more preferable procedure for the patient and surgeon in this patient group.

Is testicular microdissection the only way to retrieve sperm for non-obstructive azoospermic men?

Men presenting with non-obstructive azoospermia are the most challenging clinical scenario for an infertile couple. Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) with testicular sperm retrieval gave a chance for biological fatherhood once sperm can be found, but unfortunately sperm recovery rate (SSR) is something near 50%, leading to a discussion about what surgical retrieval technique is the best. Historically sperm have been retrieved using conventional Testicular Sperm Extraction (c-TESE), Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA), a combination of Testicular Fine Needle Aspiration (TfNA)/c-TESE, Testicular Microdissection (TM) and Open Testicular Mapping (OTEM). c-TESE published in 1995 by Devroey and cols. consists of testis delivery, a large unique albuginea incision and extraction of a portion from the majority of testicular tubules. TESA published in 1996 by Lewin and cols. is done percutaneously using a 21–23 gauge needle and a syringe to aspire testicular tubules. TfNA was published in 1965 by Obrant and Persson as an aspiration biopsy and cytological exam to verify sperm production. In 1999 Turek and cols. published the use of TfNA combined with c-TESE for sperm retrieval. In 1999, Peter Schlegel published a technique using a microsurgical approach to identify more probable sperm production areas inside the testicle that could be excised with better precision and less tissue. OTEM is a multiple biopsy approach, published in 2020 by Vieira and cols., based on TfNA principles but done at the same time without albuginea opening or surgical microscope need. Since Testicular Microdissection publication, the method became the gold standard for sperm retrieval, allowing superior SSR with minimal tissue removal, but the amount of testicular dissection to find more probable spermatogenesis areas, difficulties in comparative design studies, diversity TM results among doctors and other methods that can achieve very similar results we question TM superiority. The objective is review existing literature and discuss advantages and disadvantages of all the methods for sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermia.

Combined Trifocal and Microsurgical Testicular Sperm Extraction Enhances Sperm Retrieval Rate in Low-Chance Retrieval Non-Obstructive Azoospermia

Background: Low-chance retrieval non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients are a subpopulation of NOA patients. The objective of this study is to compare the surgical outcome of microsurgical-assisted testicular sperm extraction (M-TeSE) and combined trifocal/M-TeSE in low-chance retrieval NOA patients. Material and Methods: A single-center retrospective analysis of NOA patients who underwent testicular sperm extraction was performed. Low-chance retrieval NOA (testicular volume < 10 cc and FSH > 12.4 UI/L) was set as the inclusion criteria. Re-do TeSE procedures were excluded from the current analysis. Data were extrapolated from clinical records and operative notes. We compared data from patients who underwent classic M-TeSE (group A) with that from patients submitted to combined trifocal/M-TeSE (group B). Sperm retrieval rate (SRr) was the primary outcome of the study. Surgical outcomes and postoperative complications were evaluated. A multivariate analysis was conducted to investigate predictive factors for positive SR. Results: Overall, 80 patients (60 patients in Group A and 20 patients in Group B) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The average (SD) age was 35 (8.2) years. The average preoperative FSH was 27.5 (13) UI/L. The average testicular volume was 6.3 (3) cc on the left side and 6.8 (2.5) cc on the right. Groups were similar in terms of preoperative parameters. The overall SRr was 28%. Patients in group B had higher SRr than those in group A (29.4% vs. 26.9%, p < 0.03). We identified a significant association between testicular histopathology and positive SR (hypospermatogenesis 100%, spermatogenic arrest 32%, and Sertoli cell-only syndrome 22%). The histopathology report was the only significant predicting factor for SR in the multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The combined trifocal and M-TeSE approach is safe and may represent a valuable approach to enhance the SRr in low-chance retrieval NOA. The histopathology report is confirmed to be the only valuable predicting factor for a positive SR.

Does testicular sperm retrieval adversely impact spermatogenesis over the long-term?

Testicular sperm retrieval (TSR) techniques are valuable in the context of severe idiopathic male factor infertility; however, there are few studies in the literature examining the long-term impact of TSR on testicular function. The objective was to determine whether testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) worsens the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiency in men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia. The study population consisted of 145 men with either cryptozoospermia or severe oligozoospermia that underwent TESA or micro-TESE and had long-term post-operative semen analyses (SA). Patients with SA prior to and following TSR were included (n = 24). Amongst them, 16 men underwent TESA and 8 underwent micro-TESE. The follow-up SA was obtained at a mean of 3.0 ± 2.0 years following TSR (range: 0.3-8.3 years) amongst all participants. The post-operative semen parameters in the TESA group were similar to the pre-intervention parameters (p > 0.1). Similarly, the micro-TESE cohort did not demonstrate significant alterations in semen parameters post-intervention (p > 0.05). None of the men in the study became azoospermic following the TSR. Our study indicates TESA or micro-TESE do not appear to worsen the pre-existing spermatogenesis deficiencies in cryptozoospermic and oligozoospermic men over a long-term period. Larger studies are required to corroborate these findings.

Repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: Outcome and predictive factors

Objective

To assess the feasibility of repeated sperm recovery in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), as little is known about the extraction rate in repeated microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) in these patients.

Patients and Methods

A total of 134 men with NOA had their first sperm recovery between January 2013 and February 2020. Repeated microTESE had been done mostly for patients with a successful initial retrieval.

Results

In the 323 procedures performed on the 134 men with NOA, sperm could be retrieved in 236 procedures (73.1%). A total of 88, 61 and 40 men underwent two, three and four sperm retrievals, respectively. In these cycles, sperm could be extracted in 65 (73.9%), 53 (86.9%) and 37 (92.5%) men, respectively. During the first microTESE procedure, sperm could be extracted in 81 (60.4%) men with NOA. In all, the success rate was significantly different between subgroups, showing highest rate in hypospermatogenesis cases (95.6%), followed by maturation arrest (58.5%), and Sertoli cell-only syndrome (56.0%). However, this difference was not significant at the third and fourth repeated microTESE. The FSH levels and testicular volume were among the noticeable factors affecting success of sperm retrieval. The duration between the first and second biopsies significantly increased the success rate by a factor of 1.3-fold/month; however, afterwards, the duration did not play any role in the success of microTESE. The success of previous trial significantly increased the probability of success by 10.1-fold in the second trial, 5.6-fold in the third trial, and 16.5 folds in the fourth.

Conclusion

Repeated MD -TESE ensures a high sperm recovery rate in patients with NOA. These data also show that when no spermatozoa can be obtained after thawing cryopreserved testicular sperm for ICSI in NOA patients, a repeat microTESE procedure can be planned.

Abbreviations

ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IVF: in vitro fertilisation; MA: maturation arrest; (N)OA: (non-)obstructive azoospermia; OR: odds ratio; SCOS, Sertoli cell-only syndrome; SRR: spermatozoa retrieval rate; (micro)TESE: (microdissection) testicular sperm extraction

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in men with infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia: summary of current literature

PURPOSE

Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is associated with intrinsic testicular defects that severely impair sperm production. Although NOA invariably leads to infertility, focal sperm production may exist in the testicles of affected patients, which can be retrieved and used for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) to generate healthy offspring. However, geographic locations of testicular sperm producing-areas are uncertain, making microsurgical-guided sperm retrieval (microdissection testicular sperm extraction; micro-TESE) an attractive method to identify and retrieve sperm in patients with NOA due to spermatogenic failure. Given the widespread use of micro-TESE, its effectiveness in harvesting sperm and related potential complications need to be clarified.

METHODS

We queried PubMed/MEDLINE for studies published in English, from inception to May 2021, concerning the effect of micro-TESE on sperm retrieval rate (SRR), complication rate and ICSI pregnancy rate-using retrieved testicular sperm in subfertile couples where the male had NOA.

RESULTS

We found 116 articles, including 70 original papers, 32 review articles, and 14 systematic reviews. The evidence accounted for 4895 patients. Micro-TESE retrieved sperm in 46.6% of men with NOA, but SRRs varied considerably (18.4-70.8%) and were mainly related to the treated population characteristics. Concerning the general population of NOA patients who have not undergone previous sperm retrieval (naïve population), the SRR by micro-TESE was 46.8% (1833 of 3914 patients; range 20-70.8%; 28 studies). In studies reporting SR by micro-TESE for men who had failed percutaneous testicular sperm aspiration or non-microsurgical testicular sperm extraction, the SRR was 39.1% (127 of 325 patients; range 18.4-57.1%; 4 studies). Data on adverse events indicated that micro-TESE was associated with low (~ 3%) short-term postoperative complication rates. The fertilizing ability of testicular sperm retrieved by micro-TESE and used for ICSI was adequate (~ 57%), whereas clinical pregnancy and live birth were obtained in 39% and 24% of couples who had an embryo transfer, respectively. The health of the resulting children seems reassuring, but the evidence is limited. The procedure increases sperm retrieval success compared to non-microsurgical retrieval methods, particularly in men with Sertoli cell-only testicular histopathology.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that micro-TESE is an effective and safe method to retrieve sperm from men with NOA-related infertility, with potential advantages over non-microsurgical methods. Nevertheless, high-quality, head-to-head comparative randomized controlled trials by sperm retrieval method, focusing on SRR, live birth rate and assessing long-term adverse events and health of children conceived using testicular sperm from NOA patients are lacking. Therefore, further research is required to determine the full clinical implications of micro-TESE in male infertility treatment.

Male factor infertility: Initial workup and diagnosis in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To present a case-based discussion on the workup of male factor infertility and review currently available treatments.

SOURCES OF INFORMATION

This discussion is based on the current Canadian Urological Association and American Urological Association guidelines, with reference to landmark papers as appropriate from 2010 onward. All articles were retrieved through PubMed.

MAIN MESSAGE

Approximately 15% of Canadian couples experience infertility, making it a commonly encountered condition in the primary care setting. Among couples suffering from infertility, male factors can be identified as the sole cause in 30% of cases and as a contributing issue in 20% of cases. Although many of the treatments described aim to improve a couple's chances of naturally conceiving a child via intercourse, many patients ultimately require medical or surgical intervention to achieve pregnancy. This can be a long, protracted course for patients, with important roles for primary care providers and fertility specialists alike.

CONCLUSION

Male fertility assessment and treatment has historically been left in the hands of fertility specialists, creating a bottleneck for patients to receive fertility care. However, with increased understanding of the underlying causes of male factor infertility, the workup and initial management can occur in the primary care setting, helping to streamline care.

Predictors of testicular sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia: a review

Azoospermia is divided into two categories of obstructive azoospermia and non-obstructive azoospermia. Before 1995, couples with a male partner diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia had to choose sperm donation or adoption to have a child. Currently, testicular sperm aspiration or micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection allows patients with non-obstructive azoospermia to have biological offspring. The sperm retrieval rate is significantly higher in micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction compared with testicular sperm aspiration. Additionally, micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction has the advantages of minimal invasion, safety, limited disruption of testicular function, a low risk of postoperative intratesticular bleeding, and low serum testosterone concentrations. Failed micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction has significant emotional and financial implications on the involved couples. Testicular sperm aspiration and micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction have the possibility of failure. Therefore, predicting the sperm retrieval rate before surgery is important. This narrative review summarizes the existing data on testicular sperm aspiration and micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction to identify the possible factor(s) that can predict the presence of sperm to guide clinical practice. The predictors of surgical sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia have been widely studied, but there is no consensus.

Evaluating the quality of reported outcomes for microsurgical TESE in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: A methodological analysis

BACKGROUND

Publications of microsurgical testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) techniques and outcomes are heterogeneous, which may limit creation of best surgical practices.

OBJECTIVE

To study the quality and heterogeneity of published mTESE outcomes via a methodological analysis.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A systematic methodological analysis of all published literature on the use of mTESE in men with non-obstructive azoospermia from 1999 to the July 2020 was performed. PubMed and MEDLINE searches were performed using the search terms "microdissection TESE OR microsurgical TESE." Publications were evaluated on their reporting of pre-operative factors, intraoperative techniques, surgical and clinical outcomes, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-five studies met inclusion criteria. Surgical technique and sperm retrieval rates were the most reported criteria. Reporting on the presence of an embryologist intraoperatively was observed in approximately 30% of articles, while other procedural details including method of sperm quantification, quantity retrieved, and number of cryopreserved vials were observed in fewer than 10% of articles. Clinical outcomes, including pregnancy rates and live birth rates, were reported in fewer than 40% of the articles. Fetal outcomes including fetal and neonatal anomalies were rarely reported. Fetal growth restriction, preterm delivery, small or large for gestational age, and NICU admissions were never reported.

CONCLUSION

There are inconsistencies in reporting quality of mTESE outcomes, specifically a lack of information on the quantity and quality of sperm retrieved, the role of embryology intraoperatively, and clinical outcomes, such as live birth rate and fetal anomalies. These gaps may guide development of standardized reporting guidelines to better assess and compare clinical outcomes across institutions and maintain focus on couples-centric fertility outcomes in future mTESE studies.

[Testicular sperm extraction in male infertility : Indications, success rates, practical implementation, and possible complications]

BACKGROUND

Unwanted childlessness is a burden on a couple's relationship. The therapeutic spectrum of male infertility has increased significantly in recent years so that even azoospermia patients can be given biological paternity by testicular sperm extraction (TESE).

OBJECTIVES

The indications, success rates, practical implementation, and possible complications of conventional and microscopic TESE in male infertility are presented in this review.

METHODS

A nonsystematic search of the relevant literature was carried out.

RESULTS

In obstructive azoospermia (OA), primarily desobstructive surgical procedures are used, while TESE is the surgical procedure of choice in nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). In the latter, sperm extraction can be performed conventionally or microscopically (mTESE) assisted, whereby the latter offers an advantage in terms of sperm detection rate in the case of small testicular volumes (<12 ml), chemotherapy, Klinefelter's disease and AZFc microdeletions. The sperm detection rate of TESE is about 50%. Postoperative controls are useful because of the possible induction of symptomatic hypogonadism.

CONCLUSION

Before performing TESE, determining the hormone status and human genetic clarification are necessary. Any costs incurred and the possibility of missing sperm proof must be discussed. Close cooperation between andrologists, gynecologists, reproductive physicians, and human geneticists is necessary. All in all, TESE is a safe surgical procedure with a low complication rate.

Sterility, an Overlooked Health Condition

Clinically, infertility is defined as the inability to conceive after a certain period. In contrast, sterility is defined as the inability to produce a biological child; however, this is not a practical definition that can be applied in a clinical setting to a patient’s diagnosis. Unlike infertility, sterility is rarely discussed in biomedical and clinical literature and is often used synonymously with infertility. Infertility affects about 10% of couples globally, but the prevalence of sterility remains unknown. We divide sterility into three subtypes natural, clinical, and hardship. To estimate sterility prevalence, we analyzed primary literature and meta-analysis papers on the rates of live births and pregnancies throughout several treatments of infertile couples (e.g., untreated patients, in vitro fertilization-treated, and patients administered other treatments). This analysis indicates that all treatments fail in delivering a biological child to most couples, suggesting that most infertile couples may fail to conceive. More comprehensive primary studies are needed to provide a precise estimate of sterility. Furthermore, research is needed to study the causes of sterility, as well as develop methods for diagnosis and treatment that are financially affordable and emotionally tolerable. Altogether, sterility is an under-discussed condition that is more common than expected, as many infertile couples are unable to conceive and are, in effect, sterile.

A risk prediction model of sperm retrieval failure with fine needle aspiration in males with non-obstructive azoospermia

STUDY QUESTION

Can we predict the risk of sperm retrieval failure among men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) before they undergo fine needle aspiration (FNA)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Our model, which includes FSH level, age and testicular volume as variables, can predict the risk of sperm retrieval failure with FNA.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Combined with ICSI, testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) can enable patients with NOA to have their own genetic offspring. Nearly all reproductive medicine centres in China have applied FNA, but approximately half of patients with NOA experience testicular sperm retrieval failure. Nevertheless, the models developed to predict the likelihood of obtaining spermatozoa with testicular sperm extraction (TESE) cannot accurately predict sperm retrieval, and few of these models have been sufficiently validated.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study involved three cohorts including 597 men with NOA. From 1 January 2015 to 31 July 2017, a retrospective cohort of 317 males with NOA who underwent FNA procedures at a university affiliated hospital were included to build a risk prediction model of sperm retrieval failure with FNA. Then, from 25 October 2017 to 31 March 2018, two prospective cohorts of 61 and 219 males with NOA from the same hospital and one other reproductive specialist hospital respectively, were recruited to validate the risk prediction model.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All men with NOA undergoing their first TESE procedure as part of a fertility treatment were included. The primary end-point was the presence of one or more spermatozoa (regardless of their motility) obtained with FNA. A binary multivariable logistic model was built to predict the risk of sperm retrieval failure after TESA using the dataset from the retrospective cohort. A cut-off value for risk was calculated with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Two validation sets from the prospective cohort were used to validate the risk prediction model by measures including prediction accuracy and the true positive rate.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 327 (54.8%) males with NOA experienced sperm retrieval failure with FNA. FSH level, age and testicular volume were included in the prediction model for sperm retrieval failure risk. The model had an AUC of 82.3% (95% CI: 77.6–87.1%) and a cut-off value of 64.61% with a sensitivity of 0.677 and specificity of 0.863 for predicted risk. The predictive accuracies were 85.25 and 83.56% in the external validation sets from two centres. Specifically, 85.71 and 85.15% of NOA patients from two centres that experienced sperm retrieval failure were correctly identified using our model.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

A small proportion of males with NOA in whom sperm were successfully retrieved with FNA were misclassified; therefore, TESA techniques with higher sperm retrieval rates may be attempted in patients with high predicted risks of sperm retrieval failure rather than terminating the efforts to produce a genetic offspring. In addition, the ability to achieve a live birth using sperm retrieved with FNA was not tested in this study.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

We would recommend the use of micro-TESE for men with NOA and a high predicted risk of FNA failure.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was partly supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0907305), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81803332), Sichuan Science & Technology Program (No. 2018SZ0144, 2016SZ0066, 2018SZ0284 and 2018FZ0043), Chengdu Science & Technology Bureau (No. 2018-YF05-01265-SN), Postdoctoral Research foundation of Sichuan University (No. 2018SCU12012) and West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (No. kx027). There are no competing interests related to this study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Sperm recovery and ICSI outcomes in men with non-obstructive azoospermia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Factor affecting sperm retrieval rate (SRR) or pregnancy rates (PR) after testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) have not been systematically evaluated. In addition, although micro-TESE (mTESE) has been advocated as the gold standard for sperm retrieval in men with NOA, its superiority over conventional TESE (cTESE) remains conflicting.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective was to perform a meta-analysis of the currently available studies comparing the techniques of sperm retrieval and to identify clinical and biochemical factors predicting SRR in men with NOA. In addition, PRs and live birth rates (LBRs), as derived from subjects with NOA post-ICSI, were also analysed as secondary outcomes.

SEARCH METHODS

An extensive Medline, Embase and Cochrane search was performed. All trials reporting SRR derived from cTESE or mTESE in patients with NOA and their specific determinants were included. Data derived from genetic causes of NOA or testicular sperm aspiration were excluded.

OUTCOMES

Out of 1236 studies, 117 studies met the inclusion criteria for this study, enrolling 21 404 patients with a mean age (± SD) of 35.0 ± 2.7 years. cTESE and mTESE were used in 56 and 43 studies, respectively. In addition, 10 studies used a mixed approach and 8 studies compared cTESE with mTESE approach. Overall, a SRR per TESE procedure of 47[45;49]% (mean percentage [95% CI]) was found. No differences were observed when mTESE was compared to cTESE (46[43;49]% for cTESE versus 46[42;49]% for mTESE). Meta-regression analysis demonstrated that SRR per cycle was independent of age and hormonal parameters at enrolment. However, the SRR increased as a function of testis volume. In particular, by applying ROC curve analysis, a mean testis volume higher than 12.5 ml predicted SRR >60% with an accuracy of 86.2% ± 0.01. In addition, SRR decreased as a function of the number of Klinefelter's syndrome cases included (S = -0.02[-0.04;-0.01]; P < 0.01. I = 0.12[-0.05;0.29]; P = 0.16). Information on fertility outcomes after ICSI was available in 42 studies. Overall, a total of 1096 biochemical pregnancies were reported (cumulative PR = 29[25;32]% per ICSI cycle). A similar rate was observed when LBR was analysed (569 live births with a cumulative LBR = 24[20;28]% per ICSI cycle). No influence of male and female age, mean testis volume or hormonal parameters on both PR and LBR per ICSI cycle was observed. Finally, a higher PR per ICSI cycle was observed when the use of fresh sperm was compared to cryopreserved sperm (PR = 35[30;40]%, versus 20[13;29]% respectively): however, this result was not confirmed when cumulative LBR per ICSI cycle was analysed (LBR = 30[20;41]% for fresh versus 20[12;31]% for cryopreserved sperm).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This analysis shows that cTESE/mTESE in subjects with NOA results in SRRs of up to 50%, with no differences when cTESE was compared to mTESE. Retrieved sperms resulted in a LBR of up to 28% ICSI cycle. Although no difference between techniques was found, to conclusively clarify if one technique is superior to the other, there is a need for a sufficiently powered and well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare mTESE to cTESE in men with NOA.

Parameters predicting sperm retrieval rates during microscopic testicular sperm extraction in nonobstructive azoospermia

The aim of this study was to investigate the predictive value of the parameters that might have an effect on the success of microscopic testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in infertile patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). Between 2003 and 2014, 860 patients with NOA were retrospectively analysed. The effect of age, infertility duration, history of varicocelectomy, herniorrhaphy or orchiopexy, presence of solitary testis, tobacco use, previous testicular biopsy results, history of orchitis, usage of human chorionic gonadotropin in the past three months, presence of undescended or retractile testis, presence of varicocele, testicular volume, levels of serum follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinising hormone, and testosterone, presence of Klinefelter syndrome and micro-deletion of Y chromosome on sperm retrieval rates were evaluated. In 45.8% (n = 394) of the patients who underwent micro-TESE, spermatozoon was adequately obtained. Multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated that previous successful testicular biopsy (OR = 15.346; GA = 5.45-43.16; p < .001) and higher testicular volumes significantly increase sperm retrieval rate in micro-TESE. The testicular volume cut-off as 11 ml was found to be the most significant factor. Although currently testicular biopsy result is not being used as a diagnostic method, it is significantly associated with micro-TESE result.

Predictive value of FSH, testicular volume, and histopathological findings for the sperm retrieval rate of microdissection TESE in nonobstructive azoospermia: a meta-analysis

We performed this meta-analysis to evaluate the predictive value of different parameters in the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE) in patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). All relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO. We chose three parameters to perform the meta-analysis: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), testicular volume, and testicular histopathological findings which included three patterns: hypospermatogenesis (HS), maturation arrest (MA), and Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (SCOS). If there was a threshold effect, only the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUSROC) was calculated. Otherwise, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were also calculated. Twenty-one articles were included in our study finally. There was a threshold effect among studies investigating FSH and SCOS. The AUSROCs of FSH, testicular volume, HS, MA, and SCOS were 0.6119, 0.6389, 0.6758, 0.5535, and 0.2763, respectively. The DORs of testicular volume, HS, and MA were 1.98, 16.49, and 1.26, respectively. The sensitivities of them were 0.80, 0.30, and 0.27, while the specificities of them were 0.35, 0.98, and 0.76, respectively. The PLRs of them were 1.49, 10.63, and 1.15, respectively. And NLRs were 0.73, 0.72, and 0.95, respectively. All the investigated factors in our study had limited predictive value. However, the histopathological findings were helpful to some extent. Most patients with HS could get sperm by microdissection TESE.

Effect of seasonal variation on the success of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction: A pilot study

The aim of this study is to investigate the relationship between seasonal variation and the success of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). A total of 395 patients who were diagnosed with non-obstructive azoospermia, who had undergone mTESE operation for the first time, and who did not have an obstructive pathology, were included in the study. The patients were divided into 12 groups according to the month of the operation and four groups according to the season. The groups were compared with regard to age, duration of infertility, BMI, hormone profile and sperm retrieval rate of mTESE. The maximum sperm retrieval rate was obtained in January (69.7%) and the minimum sperm retrieval rate was obtained in November (50.0%). No statistically significant difference was detected when the mTESE results were compared with regard to months (p = 0.638). The maximum sperm retrieval rate was obtained in the summer (62.8%) and the minimum was obtained in spring (57.0%). No statistically significant difference was determined between groups created according to seasons (p = 0.865). We did not observe a statistically significant relationship between the sperm retrieval rate and the seasons. Studies conducted in regions with different climate features could better reveal the relationship between seasonal variation and the success of mTESE.

Evaluation of Prognostic Factors and Determinants in Surgical Sperm Retrieval Procedures in Azoospermic Patients

Introduction:

Main categorisation of azospermic is in two grups: nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) and obstructive azoospermia (OA). We had evaluation of prognostic factors and determinants in sperm retrieval procedures in azoospermic patients.

Methods:

Retrospective evaluation observed 21 selected patients with NOA and OA azoospermia, after that complete history, physical examination with ultarsound volume of testis and hormonal profile. Hormonal profile included: follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosteron (T) and prolactin (P) serum levels. Also karyotype and Y-deletion analysis were done and analyzed.

Results:

9 OA patients (42,9%) were undergone for TESE operation and 12 NOA patients (57,1%) for Micro-TESE operation. All TESE procedures were positive (100%). Micro-TESE in 12 selected NOA patients, 5 patients (41,6%) were positive and 7 patients (58,4%) negative. Patients testicular size, serum FSH and testosterone level showed correlation in success of sperm retrieval procedures.

Conclusion:

TESE is elected procedure for obstructive azospermia (OA). Micro-TESE is appropriate sperm retrieval procedurec for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and correlate with high FSH and small volume of testis.

A clinical trial on the consistency of bilateral testicular tissue histopathology and Johnsen score: single side or bilateral side biopsy?

To evaluate and compare left and right testicular tissue histopathology and Johnsen score, and to investigate the necessity for bilateral testicular biopsy. We recruited180 patients with non-obstructiveazoospermia (NOA) on testicular biopsy who had undergonetesticular sperm aspiration (TESA). Pathological sections of testicular tissue were diagnosed by specially-assigned doctors, who evaluated pathological findings, determined the Johnsen score and confirmed for the presence or absence of sperm. Sperm positive rates for left and right testicular histopathology were 55.0% and 51.7% respectively, and the proportion of Johnsen scores≥8 for left and right testes were 53.3% and 50.0%, respectively. Cohen kappa values revealed that the identification of sperm in bilateral testicular samples was not consistent and was related to random effects; Optimized cut-off value for bilateral testicular volume was 11ml (Johnsen score ≥8), and optimized cut-off values of E₂ on left and right testes were 144.5pmol/L and 133.5 pmol/L (Johnsen score≤7). However, age, serum prolactin (PRL), follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and total testosterone (TT) levels were not accurate predictors for the existence of testicular sperm. There was nostatistical significance between left and right testicular histopathology in terms of sperm positive rates or Johnsen score; the Johnsen score were caused entirely by random effects and a score from one side could not represent the other side. Therefore, we recommend that both testes need to undergo surgery when NOA patients undergo testicular biopsy or sperm retrieval.

Prospective evaluation of scrotal ultrasound and intratesticular perfusion by color-coded duplex sonography (CCDS) in TESE patients with azoospermia

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to assess whether CCDS might improve the outcome of testicular sperm retrieval in patients with azoospermia. Furthermore, we evaluated potential sonographic alterations of the testis before and after trifocal and Micro-TESE.

METHODS

78 patients were enrolled prospectively: 24 with obstructive azoospermia (OA) and 54 with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). 31 of 54 patients in the NOA group had negative surgical sperm retrieval. Testicular volume, hormonal parameters and sonographical findings were compared before and after TESE. The spermatogenetic score was determined for all retrieval sites. CCDS was performed at the upper, middle and lower segment of the testis. Ultrasound parameters and peak systolic velocity (PSV) were measured pre- and post-operatively.

RESULTS

Testicular volume and epididymal head size were significantly increased in OA patients compared to NOA patients. Ultrasound parameters were comparable between NOA patients with and without successful sperm retrieval. A higher intratesticular PSV was significantly correlated with a better spermatogenic score in the corresponding sonographic position. However, after adjustment for other clinical confounders, PSV does not show a significant influence on the spermatogenic score. Testicular volume decreased significantly in all patients post-operatively after 6 weeks (p < 0.001). Finally, the PSV significantly increased in all patients 24 h after surgery and nearly returned to baseline levels after 6 weeks (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher intratesticular PSV may be helpful as a pre-operative diagnostic parameter in mapping for better sperm retrieval, but CCDS does not help to predict successful testicular sperm retrieval after adjustment for other clinical confounders.

A novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in non obstructive azoospermia

Background

The purpose of the study was to investigate whether micro-TESE can improve sperm retrieval rate (SRR) compared to conventional single TESE biopsy on the same testicle or to contralateral multiple TESE, by employing a novel stepwise micro-TESE approach in a population of poor prognosis patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA).

Methods

Sixty-four poor prognosis NOA men undergoing surgical testicular sperm retrieval for ICSI, from March 2007 to April 2013, were included in this study. Patients inclusion criteria were a) previous unsuccessful TESE, b) unfavorable histology (SCOS, MA, sclerahyalinosis), c) Klinefelter syndrome. We employed a stepwise micro-TESE consisting three-steps: 1) single conventional TESE biopsy; 2) micro-TESE on the same testis; 3) contralateral multiple TESE.

Results

SRR was 28.1 % (18/64). Sperm was obtained in both the initial single conventional TESE and in the following micro-TESE. The positive or negative sperm retrieval was further confirmed by a contralateral multiple TESE, when performed. No significant pre-operative predictors of sperm retrieval, including patients’ age, previous negative TESE or serological markers (LH, FSH, inhibin B), were observed at univariate or multivariate analysis. Micro-TESE (step 2) did not improve sperm retrieval as compared to single TESE biopsy on the same testicle (step 1) or multiple contralateral TESE (step 3).

Conclusions

Stepwise micro-TESE could represent an optimal approach for sperm retrieval in NOA men. In our view, it should be offered to NOA patients in order to gradually increase surgical invasiveness, when necessary. Stepwise micro-TESE might also reduce the costs, time and efforts involved in surgery.

A laboratory modification to testicular sperm preparation technique improves spermatogenic cell yield

Testicular sperm extraction is a common procedure used to find spermatogenic cells in men with nonobstructive azoospermia. The laboratory processing of biopsied testicular tissues needs to be performed meticulously to acquire a high yield of cells. In this study, the effectiveness of mincing the tissues after testicular biopsy was assessed using histological evaluation, as was the possible adverse effect of residual tissue on the migration of spermatogenic cells during density gradient centrifugation. Our results indicate that testicular residual tissue, when laid on the density gradient medium along with the sperm wash, hinders the spermatogenic cells’ forming a pellet during centrifugation, and therefore impairs the intracytoplasmic sperm injection procedure. Whereas the mean number of recovered cells from the sperm wash medium (SWM) with residual tissue is 39.435 ± 24.849, it was notably higher (60.189 ± 28.214 cells) in the SWM without minced tissues. The remaining tissue contained no functional seminiferous tubules or spermatogenic cells in histological sections. In conclusion, the remaining residual tissue after mincing biopsied testicular tissue does not add any functional or cellular contribution to spermatogenic cell retrieval; in fact, it may block the cellular elements in the accompanying cell suspension from migrating through the gradient layers to form a pellet during centrifugation and cause loss of spermatogenic cells.

Predictive factors of successful microdissection testicular sperm extraction in patients with presumed sertoli cell-only syndrome

BACKGROUND

To evaluate predictive factors of successful microdissection-testicular sperm extraction (MD-TESE) in patients with presumed Sertoli cell-only syndrome (SCOS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 874 men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA), among whom 148 individuals with diagnosis of SCOS in prior biopsy, underwent MD-TESE at Department of Andrology, Royan Institute, Tehran, Iran. The predictive values of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone (T) levels, testicular volume, as well as male age for retrieving testicular sperm by MD-TESE were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Testicular sperm were successfully retrieved in 23.6% men with presumed SCOS. Using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, it was shown that sperm retrieval rate in the group of men with FSH values >15.25% was 28.9%. This was higher than the group of men with FSH ≤15.25 (11.8%).

CONCLUSION

Sperm retrieval rate (SRR) was 23.6% in men with presumed SCOS and FSH level can be a fair predictor for SPR at MD-TESE. MD-TESE appears to be recommendable in such cases (SCOS with high FSH concentration) with reasonable results.

[Surgery of male infertility: an update]

Surgery for male infertility includes three main areas: varicocele surgery, recanalization of seminal tract, sperm retrieval.Varicocele treatment in infertily is still controversial. Recent scientific evidence appears to demonstrate that in selected cases varicocele treatment is beneficial in improving semen parameters and pregnancy rate. The key for the success of treatment seems to be a correct indication. It is our opinion that varicocele should be treated in presence of abnormal semen parameters, when clinically significant, and in adolescents with atrophy of the affected testis. So far, no specific technique, either surgical, microsurgical or sclerotherapic, can be considered the gold standard. Good results in our hands have been obtained with the microsurgical lymphatic sparing high ligation of internal spermatic vein.Innovations in surgery for seminal tract obstructions include the new tubular invagination techniques for epididimovasostomy, which showed excellent results with a simplified and time-saving microsurgical approach. In distal obstructions, a new transperineal ultrasound-guided approach has been proposed for the diagnostic work-up and treatment. Advantages of this technique and of the TURED must be balanced with those of immediate sperm retrieval for ART.In sperm retrieval, microTESE represents the most important surgical evolution in non-obstructive azoospermia. We have recently proposed a new stepwise approach starting with a minimal equatorial incision for conventional testicular biopsy which is extended to perform microTESE only when no sperm is retrieved. In this way microTESE is offered only to patients who really need it. Another field of innovation is sperm retrieval for ICSI in patients with Klinefelter Syndrome.

Progressing management of non-obstructive azoospermia in the era of microdissection testicular sperm extraction

Previously, it was absolutely impossible for azoospermic men to reproduce except in some obstructive azoospermic cases for whom reconstruction of the seminal pathway was successful. However, nowadays, intracytoplasmic sperm injection and microdissection testicular sperm extraction have brought about chances of biological paternity in some non-obstructive azoospermic men. It is almost 15 years since the first trials of testicular sperm retrieval using surgical microscopy for non-obstructive azoospermia were reported. In this manuscript, the progress and outcomes of these novel techniques since then are reviewed, the controversial points are discussed and the latest research to achieve pregnancies in tough non-obstructive azoospermic couples are introduced. Not only the bright side of the renovations, but the underlying concerns are also discussed.

No relationship between biopsy sites near the main testicular vessels or rete testis and successful sperm retrieval using conventional or microdissection biopsies in 220 non-obstructive azoospermic men

In 220 consecutive patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, sperm retrieval was attempted by a combination of conventional and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (TESE). For sperm retrieval, 2-3 conventional biopsies were performed followed by a microdissection TESE in cases of negative conventional biopsies. During the surgery, the vasculature of the testis was assessed using the operative microscope, and the location of positive biopsies was registered in relation to the blood supply. The overall sperm retrieval rate was 58.2%. From the initial conventional biopsies, sperm could be retrieved in 46.8% of the patients. With microdissection TESE, sperm could be retrieved from an additional 11.4% of the patients. The further use of microdissection TESE improved the sperm retrieval rate significantly (P=0.017). No significant accumulation of positive biopsies was found towards the rete testis or the main testicular vessels.

Sperm recovery and IVF after testicular sperm extraction (TESE): effect of male diagnosis and use of off-site surgical centers on sperm recovery and IVF

Objective

Determine whether testicular sperm extractions and pregnancy outcomes are influenced by male and female infertility diagnoses, location of surgical center and time to cryopreservation.

Patients

One hundred and thirty men undergoing testicular sperm extraction and 76 couples undergoing 123 in vitro fertilization cycles with testicular sperm.

Outcome Measures

Successful sperm recovery defined as 1–2 sperm/0.5 mL by diagnosis including obstructive azoospermia (n = 60), non-obstructive azoospermia (n = 39), cancer (n = 14), paralysis (n = 7) and other (n = 10). Obstructive azoospermia was analyzed as congenital absence of the vas deferens (n = 22), vasectomy or failed vasectomy reversal (n = 37) and “other”(n = 1). Sperm recovery was also evaluated by surgical site including infertility clinic (n = 54), hospital operating room (n = 67) and physician’s office (n = 11). Treatment cycles were evaluated for number of oocytes, fertilization, embryo quality, implantation rate and clinical/ongoing pregnancies as related to male diagnosis, female diagnosis, and use of fresh or cryopreserved testicular sperm.

Results

Testicular sperm recovery from azoospermic males with all diagnoses was high (70 to 100%) except non-obstructive azoospermia (31%) and was not influenced by distance from surgical center to laboratory. Following in vitro fertilization, rate of fertilization was significantly lower with non-obstructive azoospermia (43%, p = <0.0001) compared to other male diagnoses (66%, p = <0.0001, 59% p = 0.015). No differences were noted in clinical pregnancy rate by male diagnosis; however, the delivery rate per cycle was significantly higher with obstructive azoospermia (38% p = 0.0371) compared to diagnoses of cancer, paralysis or other (16.7%). Women diagnosed with diminished ovarian reserve had a reduced clinical pregnancy rate (7.4% p = 0.007) compared to those with other diagnoses (44%).

Conclusion

Testicular sperm extraction is a safe and effective option regardless of the etiology of the azoospermia. The type of surgical center and/or its distance from the laboratory was not related to success. Men with non-obstructive azoospermia have a lower chance of successful sperm retrieval and fertilization.

An update on sperm retrieval techniques for azoospermic males

The use of non-ejaculated sperm coupled with intracytoplasmic sperm injection has become a globally established procedure for couples with azoospermic male partners who wish to have biological offspring. Surgical methods have been developed to retrieve spermatozoa from the epididymides and the testes of such patients. This article reviews the methods currently available for sperm acquisition in azoospermia, with a particular focus on the perioperative, anesthetic and technical aspects of these procedures. A critical analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of these sperm retrieval methods is provided, including the authors' methods of choice and anesthesia preferences.

Cryopreservation of testicular and epididymal sperm: techniques and clinical outcomes of assisted conception

The introduction of the technique of intracytoplasmic sperm injection to achieve fertilization, especially using surgically retrieved testicular or epididymal sperm from men with obstructive or non-obstructive azoospermia, has revolutionized the field of assisted reproduction. The techniques for the retrieval of spermatozoa vary from relatively simple percutaneous sperm aspiration to open excision (testicular biopsy) and the more invasive Micro-TESE. The probability of retrieving spermatozoa can be as high as 100% in men with obstructive azoospermia (congenital bilateral absence of the vas deferens, status post-vasectomy). However, in nonobstructive azoospermia, successful sperm retrieval has been reported in 10-100% of cases by various investigators. The surgical retrieval and cryopreservation of sperm, especially in men with non-obstructive azoospermia, to some extent ensures the availability of sperm at the time of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In addition, this strategy can avoid unnecessary ovarian stimulation in those patients intending to undergo in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection with freshly retrieved testicular sperm when an absolute absence of sperm in the testis is identified. Several different methods for the cryopreservation of testicular and epididymal sperm are available. The choice of the container or carrier may be an important consideration and should take into account the number or concentration of the sperm in the final preparation. When the number of sperm in a testicular biopsy sample is extremely low (e.g., 1-20 total sperm available), the use of an evacuated zona pellucida to store the cryopreserved sperm has been shown to be an effective approach.

Sperm retrieval and live birth rates in presumed Sertoli-cell-only syndrome in testis biopsy: a single centre experience

We aimed to investigate sperm retrieval rates (SRR) by testicular sperm extraction (TESE), factors affecting SRR, and fertilization rate (FR), implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and live birth rate (LBR) in patients with presumed Sertoli-cell-only syndrome in testis biopsy (SCOS). We retrospectively evaluated files of 134 patients with SCOS who underwent TESE. Group I were patients in whom spermatozoa were retrieved and Group II were patients in whom no spermatozoa could be retrieved. SRR, Follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), Luteinizing hormone (LH), and testosterone levels, and the volume of testicles were compared between groups. In addition, FR, IR, CPR and LBR were determined. Sperm retrieval was achieved in 37 (27.6%) patients (Group I), and the remaining 97 (72.4%) patients made Group II. There were no significant differences in age, infertility time, testicular volume, serum FSH, LH and testosterone levels between Groups I and II (p > 0.05). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in 36 patients. FR, IR, and CPR were 60.86 ± 23.03, 36.53 ± 41.78 and 51.3% respectively. Cycle and patient based LBRs were 37.8 and 45.1% respectively. SRR in SCOS is lower than patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) in general. No parameters to predict spermatozoa retrieval were determined. In patients with SCOS, ICSI achieves similar live birth rate to other patients with NOA.

Testicular sperm aneuploidy in non-obstructive azoospermic patients

BACKGROUND

Non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) men can father children after testicular sperm extraction (TESE). Previous studies suggest that they may be at risk of producing chromosomally abnormal spermatozoa, but the number of sperm analysed per patient was usually very low.

METHODS

Multicolour fluorescence in situ hybridization was used for detection of chromosome 13, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, X and Y disomy and diploidy in sperm obtained from NOA men (n = 17) and control donors (n = 10). At least 500 testicular sperm were scored in each patient to increase the precision of our study.

RESULTS

The mean frequency of overall disomy (2.32%) and diploidy (0.80%) found in 13 689 testicular spermatozoa of NOA patients was significantly higher than in the ejaculated sperm of normospermic control donors, disomy (0.62%) and diploidy (0.29%). A highly significant increase in frequencies of chromosome 15, Y and overall disomy (P < 0.001), and a significant increase in disomy of chromosome 13 (P = 0.002), 16 (P = 0.031) and 21 (P = 0.018), overall diploidy (P = 0.031) and diploidy caused by errors in meiosis I (P = 0.011) were observed in the NOA group.

CONCLUSIONS

Testicular sperm samples of NOA patients show a higher incidence of numerical chromosomal abnormalities compared with ejaculated sperm of control donors. Appropriate genetic counselling is necessary in NOA men undergoing TESE.

Surgical techniques for the management of male infertility

Evaluation and surgical treatment of male infertility has evolved and expanded, now leading to more precise diagnoses and tailored treatments with diminished morbidity and greater success. Surgeries for male infertility are divided into four major categories: (i) diagnostic surgery; (ii) surgery to improve sperm production; (iii) surgery to improve sperm delivery; and (iv) surgery to retrieve sperm for use with in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF-ICSI). While today we are more successful than ever in treating male infertility, pregnancy is still not always achieved likely due to factors that remain poorly understood. Clinicians treating infertility should advocate for couple-based therapy, and require that both partners have a thorough evaluation and an informed discussion before undergoing specific surgical therapies.

Predictors of sperm recovery and azoospermia relapse in men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocele repair

PURPOSE

In this study we determined the recoverability and sustainability of motile sperm in semen of men with nonobstructive azoospermia after varicocelectomy as related to different variables.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Men with documented infertility for more than 1 year, with nonobstructive azoospermia and clinically palpable varicoceles were included in this prospective noncontrolled study. Participants underwent simultaneous subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy and testicular biopsies. Preoperative as well as initial and late followup semen analyses were performed. Outcomes of sperm recovery and relapse of azoospermia were correlated with the variables of patient age, infertility duration, varicocele grade, laterality, follicle-stimulating hormone, testicular volume and testicular histology.

RESULTS

The study included 31 men with a mean ± SD age of 34.9 ± 8.7 years and mean followup of 19.3 ± 3.3 months. Hypospermatogenesis, late maturation arrest, early maturation arrest and Sertoli-cell-only were observed in 13, 6, 2 and 10 patients, respectively. Overall, sperm recovery was evident in 10 of 31 (32.3%) patients (persistent recovery 19.4%, intermittent recovery 6.5%, relapse 6.5%). Sperm were recovered in patients with hypospermatogenesis (7 of 13, 53.8%) and late maturation arrest (3 of 6, 50%). No sperm were recovered in those with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Among the variables only histological patterns demonstrated a significant correlation with recovery (rho = 0.504, p = 0.004). None of variables was significantly correlated with relapse. Bilateral varicocele repair demonstrated a strong yet nonsignificant negative correlation with relapse (rho = -0.612, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

Varicocelectomy could recover motile sperm in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, palpable varicoceles and hypospermatogenesis or late maturation arrest. No sperm was recovered with early maturation arrest or Sertoli-cell-only. Recovery might be persistent or intermittent, or involve relapse of azoospermia. Testicular histology was the sole parameter significantly correlated with recovery and no predictors of relapse could be identified. This prognostic role of testicular biopsy is imperative in couple counseling.

Clinical comparison of conventional testicular sperm extraction and microdissection techniques for non-obstructive azoospermia

Background

We compared the efficacy of microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microdissection TESE) and conventional TESE in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) and related the positive sperm recovery to certain variables: follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, testicular volume and histology.

Methods

Sperm retrieval rates (SRR) in patients with NOA who underwent microdissection TESE (n = 65) or conventional TESE (n = 68) were compared and related to the different variables.

Results

SRR by microdissection TESE (56.9%) was significantly higher than conventional TESE (38.2%). There was a positive relation between the SRR and increased testicular volume or decreased FSH levels. No effect of Testosterone or Prolactin levels on SRR by using either technique was observed. Sperm were recovered from those with hypospermatogenesis in 84% and 92.9% by conventional and microdissection TESE, respectively (P = 0.3). In cases of maturation arrest the SRR was 27.3% and 36.4%, respectively (P = 0.6). In cases of Sertoli-cell-only syndrome (SCOS) the SRR was 6.2% and 26.9%, respectively (P = 0.03). No major operative complications occurred in any patient in either group, and no patient required post-operative hormone replacement to treat hypogonadism.

Conclusions

Microdissection TESE significantly had twice better probability of success of SRR when compared to conventional TESE. No secure pre-operative prognostic elements of sperm recovery exist for NOA patients. Microdissection TESE appears to be recommendable in cases of atrophied testicles, high FSH concentration, or when SCOS with high FSH concentration can be predicted.

Keywords

Microdissection TESE; Sperm retrieval; Non-obstructive azoospermia; Histopathology; FSH concentration; Orchidometry