Management of localized and locally advanced renal tumors. A contemporary review of current treatment options

About 70% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with localized or locally advanced disease at primary diagnosis. Whereas these patients are potentially curable by surgical treatment alone, a further 20% to 30% of patients are diagnosed with primary metastatic disease. Although over the past years medical treatment for metastatic patients has nearly completely changed from immunotherapy to effective treatment with targeted agents, metastatic disease still represents a disease status which is not curable. Also in patients with metastatic disease, surgical treatment of the primary tumor plays an important role, since local tumor related complications can be avoided or minimized by surgery. Furthermore, also improvement of overall survival has been proven for surgery in metastatic patients when combined with cytokine treatment. Hence, surgical combined with systemic treatment as a multi-modal, adjuvant, and neo-adjuvant treatment is also required in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. A growing number of elderly and comorbid patients are currently diagnosed with small renal masses, which has led to increased attention paid to alternative ablative treatment modalities as well as active surveillance strategies, which are applied in order to avoid unnecessary overtreatment in these patients. Since surgical treatment also might enhance the risk of chronic kidney disease with consecutive cardiac disorders as well as reduced overall survival, ablative techniques and active surveillance are increasingly applied. In this review article we focus on current surgical and none-surgical treatment options for the management of patients with localized, locally advanced, and metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration

5075

Background: There is relatively little literature regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical nephroureterectomy in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Our goal was to determine the incidence of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients and the ensuing effect on overall- and cancer-specific survival. Methods: Using an international collaborative database, we identified 1390 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic UTUC between the years of 1992 and 2006. Of these, 542 (39%) patients were classified as high-risk (pT3N0, pT4N0, and/or lymph node positive). These patients were separated into two groups—those who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy—and were stratified by gender, age group, performance status, tumor grade and stage. Cox proportional hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine overall- and cancer-specific survival amongst the cohorts. Results: Of the high-risk patients, 121 (22%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more commonly administered in the context of increased tumor grade and stage (p < 0.001). Median survival in the entire cohort was 24 months (range 0–231 months). There was no significant difference in overall- or cancer-specific survival between those who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy; however age, performance status, tumor grade, and tumor stage were significant predictors of both overall and cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy is infrequently utilized in the treatment of patients with high-risk UTUC after nephroureterectomy. Despite this, it appears that adjuvant chemotherapy confers minimal impact on overall- or cancer-specific survival in this group.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Bilateral Renal Mass Suggestive of Cancer

We present the case of a 44-year old man, presenting with acute left flank pain and gross haematuria, affected by bilateral renal mass and massive para-aortic and mediastinic lymphadenopathy, highly suspicious for metastatic renal cancer.

Medical therapy of prostate cancer. A review

Androgen ablation or blockade of androgen action through the androgen receptor (AR) has been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The relative merits of monotherapy or combined androgen blockade (CAB) are still the subject of debate. Each treatment strategy/hormonal agent has favourable and unfavourable effects. Patients with advanced prostate cancer will clearly benefit androgen deprivation-based treatment for palliating their symptoms and for improving their quality of life (QOL). However, whether these therapies prolong survival when administered before there are symptoms caused by disease progression remains controversial. Data from multiple recent studies indicate that an earlier treatment in patient's disease course likely leads to better outcome, but it is not easy to predict the best timing of hormonal therapy for asymptomatic advanced disease. For the purpose of delaying the onset of androgen-independent growth of prostate cancer, different regimen of intermittent androgen blockade (IAB) have been applied to patients. The use of IAB is increasing but, despite theoretical advantages in terms of patient QOL, clinical studies have yet to prove superiority over continuous therapy. The role of androgen deprivation in combination with surgery or radiotherapy has been also evaluated. While neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (NHT) can significantly decrease the incidence of positive margins at the time of radical prostatectomy (RP), 3 months of treatment is not long enough to have any significant effect on biochemical recurrence rates. The results of studies investigating longer courses (8 months) of NHT are awaited. High-risk patients should be considered for early adjuvant hormonal therapy (AHT) after surgery, as they may be most likely to benefit. The rationale for the use of NHT in combination with radiotherapy is that it reduces tumour volume and therefore the amount of radiation therapy that is needed to treat the tumour. It has been found that 3-4 months of hormonal treatment reduces prostate volume by 25-50%. Intermediate-risk patients treated with NHT and concomitant hormonal therapy have been found to have a 94% freedom for biochemical failure after 4 years, suggesting that this group is the ideal patient population to receive short-term hormonal therapy in combination with brachytherapy. Several studies suggested the current consensus that patients with clinically localized or locally advanced high-grade tumours benefit from definitive radiation therapy and long-term AHT. The current treatment for advanced prostate cancer remains essentially palliative. However, an increased understanding of the heterogeneous nature of the disease, the mechanisms that lead to hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) has identified novel therapeutic targets and led to the development of selective new therapies, that may help to prolong survival and maintain QOL for patients with HRPC.

Diagnosis of prostate cancer. State of the art

The widespread acceptance of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) measurement as an early detection method for prostate cancer (Pca), coupled with the recent heightened public awareness of Pca as a common disease, has led to an increase in the detection of Pca. It has been established that digital rectal examination (DRE) and PSA are the most useful front-line methods for assessing an individual's risk of Pca. In addition to an elevated PSA above 4 ng/mL and an abnormal DRE, the decision to proceed with TRUS-guided biopsy may also be supported by other factors. Determining the presence of a significant rise in PSA between tests, whether the degree of PSA is concordant with the size of the prostate, and age appropriate PSA may aid in the interpretation of this risk. Grayscale transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) has been established as the first choice imaging technique making it possible to take biopsies, measure the volume and obtain a general overview of the prostate. To improve, however, the TRUS detection rate of Pca, many ultrasonographic technique improvements have been introduced and continuously evaluated. As for prostate biopsy, in the prostate with visible lesions, lesion-guided biopsies only play a role in combination with systematic biopsies, while the systematic prostate biopsy scheme should at the present time include 10 or 12 cores according to prostatic weight. The other imaging techniques actually play a marginal role in Pca detection, but may be useful for staging newly diagnosed Pca or in patient re-staging in case of biochemical failure after radical treatment.

Diagnosis of local recurrence after radical prostatectomy

In the long-term there is biochemical evidence of recurrent prostate carcinoma in approximately 40% of patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Detecting the site of recurrence (local vs distant) is critical for defining the optimum treatment. Pathological and clinical variables, e.g. Gleason score, involvement of seminal vesicles or lymph nodes, margin status at surgery, and especially the timing and pattern of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence, may help to predict the site of relapse. Transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) of the prostatic fossa in association with TRUS-guided needle biopsy is considered more sensitive than a digital rectal examination for detecting local recurrence, especially if PSA levels are low. Although it cannot detect minimal tumour mass at very low PSA levels (< 1 ng/mL) TRUS biopsy is presently the most sensitive method for detecting local recurrence. Nevertheless, the conclusive role of biopsy of the vesico-urethral anastomosis remains unclear. However, 111In-capromab pendetide scintigraphy and [11C]-choline tomography (which are better than conventional imaging for detecting metastatic tumour), have low detection rates for local disease and are considered complementary to TRUS in this setting. Patients with a high PSA after RP may be managed with external beam salvage radiotherapy. An initial PSA of < 1 ng/mL, Gleason score < 8 and radiation dose of 66-70 Gy seem to be key factors in determining success. Although a positive TRUS anastomotic biopsy may predict a better outcome after radiation therapy, the need to take a biopsy in the event of PSA failure remains under investigation. The value of salvage radiation to the prostatic bed for PSA-only progression after RP remains in question.

Thermo-chemotherapy and electromotive drug administration of mitomycin C in superficial bladder cancer eradication. a pilot study on marker lesion

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of two novel methods for intravesical chemotherapy administration in patients suffering from superficial bladder carcinomas. To draw preliminary considerations concerning the ablative effect on marker lesion using novel approaches compared to standard intravesical chemotherapy.

METHODS

Eighty patients suffering from single, recurrent, low-stage, low-grade superficial bladder tumor entered a prospective nonrandomized study. Thirty-six of them were treated by means of mitomycin C instillation as a standard procedure. In 29 patients mitomycin C solution was administered in combination with local microwave-induced hyperthermia and in 15 patients the mitomycin C solution was administered according to the electromotive drug procedure. The treatment was scheduled as a short term neo-adjuvant regimen prior to transurethral resection. Feasibility and safety of the different procedures were evaluated on an outpatients basis. The local toxicity induced by different approaches was defined and compared using a subjective questionnaire.

RESULTS

Both intravesical chemotherapy administered in combination with hyperthermia and according to the electromotive drug technique appeared to be feasible and safe. Local toxicity induced by thermo-chemotherapy was more severe than that registered for electromotive drug technique and standard intravesical chemotherapy. Local toxicity was always short and self healing without early or delayed major complications. A higher complete response rate on marker lesion was observed after thermo-chemotherapy compared to other administration methods.

CONCLUSION

The intravesical administration of mitomycin C can be safely performed in the form of both thermo-chemotherapy and electromotive drug approach with an increased ablative success rate on small superficial tumor involving only minimal local side effects.

Nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy with orthotopic urinary diversion for select patients with superficial bladder cancer: an innovative surgical approach

PURPOSE

Radical cystectomy is advocated for high risk patients with superficial bladder cancer. To preserve complete urinary continence, normal sexual function and fertility in young patients, we developed an innovative technique based on nerve and seminal sparing radical cystectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Radical cystectomy was recommended for 8 patients with superficial bladder cancer that was not conservatively manageable. Average patient age was 44 years (range 36 to 48), and all patients were extremely anxious to maintain potency and fertility. The surgical procedure consisted of transurethral resection of the prostate, pelvic iliac lymph node dissection and extraperitoneal radical cystectomy performed while preserving the vas deferens seminal vesicles and neurovascular bundles. Urinary diversion was accomplished with a W-shaped ileal reservoir anastomosed to the prostatic capsule.

RESULTS

Patients were generally discharged from the hospital 15 days after surgery, and postoperative morbidity was limited. Daytime and nighttime continence was immediate and complete after catheter removal. Normal erectile function was clinically documented in all patients while fertility potential with semen retrieval via urine was recorded in 7. The quality of life, as reported by the patients, was highly satisfactory at 18-month followup.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach we describe should be considered in young men with clinical, superficial bladder tumors refractory to conservative treatment who wish to maintain potency and fertility, and to guarantee as good a quality of life as possible. To ensure oncological success scrupulous patient selection is a primary step of this procedure.