1
|
Resch I, Bruchbacher A, Franke J, Fajkovic H, Remzi M, Shariat SF, Schmidinger M. Outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma across different treatment lines. ESMO Open 2021; 6:100122. [PMID: 34217917 PMCID: PMC8261552 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 04/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a paradigm change in the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Prospective trials have focused on ICI treatment in the first or second line. The aim of this analysis is to evaluate the benefit of ICI across different treatment lines. PATIENTS AND METHODS This is a single-center retrospective study that included mRCC patients who received ICIs in various treatment lines. Objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. RESULTS Ninety-four patients were eligible for full evaluation. Patients were classified as International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group categorization as good, intermediate and poor risk in 26.8%, 61.6% and 14.8% of cases, respectively. They were treated with ICI monotherapy, dual ICI therapy and ICI + tyrosine kinase inhibitor in 59%, 20% and 21% of cases, respectively. ORR, median PFS and OS for the entire cohort was 39.4%, 9.67 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9-12.4 months] and 23.6 months (95% CI 13.3-33.9 months), respectively. The ORR by treatment line was 33% in first, 40.4% in the second, 35% in the third and 43.5% in the fourth line and beyond. Median PFS by treatment line was 8.6, 10.3, 7.9 and 7.23 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached in first-line treatment and was 26.2, 18.1 and 20.7 months in the second, third and fourth line and beyond, respectively. CONCLUSIONS ICIs or ICI combinations are active in all treatment lines and should also be offered in heavily pretreated patients. Patient selection based on tumor and patient factors allows for maximal benefit from ICI-based therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I Resch
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - A Bruchbacher
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Franke
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - M Schmidinger
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Horwich A, Babjuk M, Bellmunt J, Bruins HM, De Reijke TM, De Santis M, Gillessen S, James N, Maclennan S, Palou J, Powles T, Ribal MJ, Shariat SF, Van Der Kwast T, Xylinas E, Agarwal N, Arends T, Bamias A, Birtle A, Black PC, Bochner BH, Bolla M, Boormans JL, Bossi A, Briganti A, Brummelhuis I, Burger M, Castellano D, Cathomas R, Chiti A, Choudhury A, Compérat E, Crabb S, Culine S, De Bari B, DeBlok W, De Visschere PJL, Decaestecker K, Dimitropoulos K, Dominguez-Escrig JL, Fanti S, Fonteyne V, Frydenberg M, Futterer JJ, Gakis G, Geavlete B, Gontero P, Grubmüller B, Hafeez S, Hansel DE, Hartmann A, Hayne D, Henry AM, Hernandez V, Herr H, Herrmann K, Hoskin P, Huguet J, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Jones R, Kamat AM, Khoo V, Kiltie AE, Krege S, Ladoire S, Lara PC, Leliveld A, Linares-Espinós E, Løgager V, Lorch A, Loriot Y, Meijer R, Carmen Mir M, Moschini M, Mostafid H, Müller AC, Müller CR, N'Dow J, Necchi A, Neuzillet Y, Oddens JR, Oldenburg J, Osanto S, Oyen WJG, Pacheco-Figueiredo L, Pappot H, Patel MI, Pieters BR, Plass K, Remzi M, Retz M, Richenberg J, Rink M, Roghmann F, Rosenberg JE, Rouprêt M, Rouvière O, Salembier C, Salminen A, Sargos P, Sengupta S, Sherif A, Smeenk RJ, Smits A, Stenzl A, Thalmann GN, Tombal B, Turkbey B, Vahr Lauridsen S, Valdagni R, Van Der Heijden AG, Van Poppel H, Vartolomei MD, Veskimäe E, Vilaseca A, Vives Rivera FA, Wiegel T, Wiklund P, Williams A, Zigeuner R, Witjes JA. EAU-ESMO consensus statements on the management of advanced and variant bladder cancer-an international collaborative multi-stakeholder effort: under the auspices of the EAU and ESMO Guidelines Committees†. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1697-1727. [PMID: 31740927 PMCID: PMC7360152 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz296] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although guidelines exist for advanced and variant bladder cancer management, evidence is limited/conflicting in some areas and the optimal approach remains controversial. OBJECTIVE To bring together a large multidisciplinary group of experts to develop consensus statements on controversial topics in bladder cancer management. DESIGN A steering committee compiled proposed statements regarding advanced and variant bladder cancer management which were assessed by 113 experts in a Delphi survey. Statements not reaching consensus were reviewed; those prioritised were revised by a panel of 45 experts before voting during a consensus conference. SETTING Online Delphi survey and consensus conference. PARTICIPANTS The European Association of Urology (EAU), the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), experts in bladder cancer management. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statements were ranked by experts according to their level of agreement: 1-3 (disagree), 4-6 (equivocal), 7-9 (agree). A priori (level 1) consensus was defined as ≥70% agreement and ≤15% disagreement, or vice versa. In the Delphi survey, a second analysis was restricted to stakeholder group(s) considered to have adequate expertise relating to each statement (to achieve level 2 consensus). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 116 statements were included in the Delphi survey. Of these, 33 (28%) statements achieved level 1 consensus and 49 (42%) statements achieved level 1 or 2 consensus. At the consensus conference, 22 of 27 (81%) statements achieved consensus. These consensus statements provide further guidance across a broad range of topics, including the management of variant histologies, the role/limitations of prognostic biomarkers in clinical decision making, bladder preservation strategies, modern radiotherapy techniques, the management of oligometastatic disease and the evolving role of checkpoint inhibitor therapy in metastatic disease. CONCLUSIONS These consensus statements provide further guidance on controversial topics in advanced and variant bladder cancer management until a time where further evidence is available to guide our approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Horwich
- Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Emeritus Professor, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
| | - M Babjuk
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - J Bellmunt
- IMIM-Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain; Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - H M Bruins
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - T M De Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M De Santis
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Charité University Hospital, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Gillessen
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St Gallen, St Gallen; University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - N James
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham; Institute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
| | - S Maclennan
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Powles
- The Royal Free NHS Trust, London; Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M J Ribal
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S F Shariat
- Depatment of Urology, 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Motol, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - T Van Der Kwast
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris; Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - N Agarwal
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah (NCI-CCC), Salt Lake City, USA
| | - T Arends
- Urology Department, Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Bamias
- 2nd Propaedeutic Dept of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - A Birtle
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; Rosemere Cancer Centre, Lancashire Teaching Hospitals, Preston, UK
| | - P C Black
- Department of Urologic Sciences, Vancouver Prostate Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - B H Bochner
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York; Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - M Bolla
- Emeritus Professor of Radiation Oncology, Grenoble - Alpes University, Grenoble, France
| | - J L Boormans
- Department of Urology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A Bossi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Institute, Villejuif, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Milan; Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - I Brummelhuis
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - M Burger
- Department of Urology, Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - D Castellano
- Medical Oncology Department, 12 de Octubre University Hospital (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Cathomas
- Department Innere Medizin, Abteilung Onkologie und Hämatologie, Kantonsspital Graubünden, Chur, Switzerland
| | - A Chiti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - A Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - E Compérat
- Department of Pathology, Tenon Hospital, HUEP, Paris; Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - S Crabb
- Cancer Sciences Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - S Culine
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris
| | - B De Bari
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire "Jean Minjoz" of Besançon, INSERM UMR 1098, Besançon, France; Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - W DeBlok
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P J L De Visschere
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Division of Genitourinary Radiology and Mammography, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent
| | - K Decaestecker
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - K Dimitropoulos
- Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - J L Dominguez-Escrig
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - S Fanti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Policlinico S Orsola, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - V Fonteyne
- Department of Radiotherapy Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - M Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
| | - J J Futterer
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G Gakis
- Department of Urology and Paediatric Urology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Julius-Maximillians University, Würzburg, Germany
| | - B Geavlete
- Department of Urology, Saint John Emergency Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
| | - P Gontero
- Division of Urology, Molinette Hospital, University of Studies of Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - B Grubmüller
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - S Hafeez
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - D E Hansel
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Diego Pathology, La Jolla, USA
| | - A Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - D Hayne
- Department of Urology, UWA Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Australia
| | - A M Henry
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - V Hernandez
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
| | - H Herr
- Urology Service, Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - K Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - P Hoskin
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester; The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, London, UK
| | - J Huguet
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - B A Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan; Division of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - R Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, College of Medicine, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - A M Kamat
- Department of Urology - Division of Surgery, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - V Khoo
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London; Department of Clinical Oncology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A E Kiltie
- CRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - S Krege
- Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Urologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| | - S Ladoire
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges François Leclerc, Dijon, France
| | - P C Lara
- Department of Oncology, Hospital Universitario San Roque, Canarias; Universidad Fernando Pessoa, Canarias, Spain
| | - A Leliveld
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - V Løgager
- Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Herlev, Denmark
| | - A Lorch
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Y Loriot
- Département de Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, INSERM U981, Université Paris-Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - R Meijer
- UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, MS Oncologic Urology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Servicio de Urología, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - H Mostafid
- Department of Urology, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, UK
| | - A-C Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University, Tübingen, Germany
| | - C R Müller
- Cancer Treatment Centre, Sorlandet Hospital, Kristiansand, Norway
| | - J N'Dow
- Academic Urology Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK; Department of Urology, Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Aberdeen, UK
| | - A Necchi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Department of Urology, Hospital Foch, University of Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - J R Oddens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Oldenburg
- Department of Oncology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog; Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Osanto
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden
| | - W J G Oyen
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan; Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - L Pacheco-Figueiredo
- Department of Urology, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto; Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal
| | - H Pappot
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M I Patel
- Department of Urology, Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - B R Pieters
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam
| | - K Plass
- EAU Guidelines Office, Arnhem, The Netherlands
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Retz
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Richenberg
- Department of Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Royal Sussex County Hospital, Brighton; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - M Rink
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg
| | - F Roghmann
- Department of Urology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Marien Hospital, Herne, Germany
| | - J E Rosenberg
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Department of Urology, Sorbonne Université, GRC n°5, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris
| | - O Rouvière
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'Imagerie Urinaire et Vasculaire, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon; Université de Lyon, Université Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - C Salembier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Europe Hospitals Brussels, Brussels, Belgium
| | - A Salminen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - P Sargos
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Sengupta
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne; Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - A Sherif
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Urology and Andrology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - R J Smeenk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - A Smits
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| | - A Stenzl
- Department of Urology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - G N Thalmann
- Department of Urology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
| | - B Tombal
- Division of Urology, IREC, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, UCL, Brussels, Belgium
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S Vahr Lauridsen
- Department of Urology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - R Valdagni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | | | - H Van Poppel
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M D Vartolomei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science, and Technology of Targu Mures, Targu Mures, Romania
| | - E Veskimäe
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland
| | - A Vilaseca
- Uro-Oncology Unit, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F A Vives Rivera
- Clinica HematoOncologica Bonadona Prevenir, Universidad Metropolitana, Clinica Club de Leones, Barranquilla, Colombia
| | - T Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - P Wiklund
- Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, USA; Department of Urology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Williams
- Department of Urology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - R Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - J A Witjes
- Department of Urology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wirth GJ, Haitel A, Moschini M, Soria F, Klatte T, Hassler MR, Bensalah K, Briganti A, Karam JA, Lotan Y, Margulis V, Raman JD, Remzi M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Robinson BD, Rouprêt M, Wood CG, Shariat SF. Androgen receptor expression is associated with adverse pathological features in ureteral but not in pelvicalyceal urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract. World J Urol 2016; 35:943-949. [PMID: 27730305 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-016-1946-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/27/2016] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to determine the significance of androgen receptor (AR) expression in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UTUC). METHODS AR expression was assessed on tissue microarrays containing specimens of 737 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy with curative intent. AR expression was correlated with clinical and pathological tumor features as well as recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Overall, AR was expressed in 11 % of tumors. AR expression was significantly associated with tumor necrosis as well as sessile and multifocal tumor growth but not with RFS, CSS or OS. AR was detected nearly twice as often in tumors of the ureter than of the pelvicalyceal system (p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses showed that the significant associations of AR with unfavorable pathologic features were exclusively attributable to tumors located in the ureter. However, in both ureteral and pelvicalyceal tumors, AR status was independent of RFS, CSS and OS. CONCLUSIONS In this cohort of patients treated with RNU, AR expression was found in approximately 10 % of UTUCs, twice as often in ureteral than in pelvicalyceal tumors. While AR expression had no impact on postoperative prognosis, it was significantly associated with unfavorable pathologic features in ureteral tumors. Steroid hormone signaling might be relevant for future investigations of differences between ureteral and pelvicalyceal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G J Wirth
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A Haitel
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - F Soria
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Studies of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - T Klatte
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.,Karl-Landsteiner Institute for Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - M R Hassler
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - K Bensalah
- Department of Urology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Institute, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - J A Karam
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Y Lotan
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - V Margulis
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - J D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - N Rioux-Leclercq
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - B D Robinson
- Department of Pathology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - M Rouprêt
- Academic Department of Urology, La Pitié-Salpetrière Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Pierre et Marie Curie, University Paris 6, Paris, France
| | - C G Wood
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Vienna General Hospital, Medizinische Universität Wien/Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. .,Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA. .,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nison L, Colin P, Remzi M, Shariat S, Klatte T, Yakoubi R, Bozzini G, Capitanio U, Babjuk M, Merseburger A, Cha E, Fritsche H, Novara G, Montorsi F, Hora M, Roupret M. Résultats oncologiques du traitement des TVES≤pT2 de l’uretère pelvien par néphro-urétérectomie, résection segmentaire et chirurgie endoscopique : résultats d’une étude multicentrique européenne. Prog Urol 2015; 25:807. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2015.08.182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
5
|
Rieken M, Schubert T, Xylinas E, Kluth L, Rouprêt M, Trinh QD, Lee R, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Fajkovic H, Novara G, Margulis V, Lotan Y, Martinez-Salamanca J, Matsumoto K, Seitz C, Remzi M, Karakiewicz P, Scherr D, Briganti A, Bachmann A, Shariat S. Association of perioperative blood transfusion with oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2014; 40:1693-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Revised: 03/16/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
6
|
Sevcenco S, Heinz-Peer G, Ponhold L, Javor D, Kuehhas F, Klingler H, Remzi M, Weibl P, Shariat S, Baltzer P. Utility and limitations of 3-Tesla diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for differentiation of renal tumors. Eur J Radiol 2014; 83:909-913. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2013] [Revised: 02/21/2014] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
7
|
Rieken M, Xylinas E, Kluth L, Trinh QD, Lee RK, Fajkovic H, Novara G, Margulis V, Lotan Y, Martinez-Salamanca JI, Matsumoto K, Seitz C, Remzi M, Karakiewicz PI, Scherr DS, Briganti A, Kautzky-Willer A, Bachmann A, Shariat SF. Diabetes mellitus without metformin intake is associated with worse oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2013; 40:113-20. [PMID: 24113620 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2013.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2013] [Revised: 09/04/2013] [Accepted: 09/10/2013] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Evidence suggests a detrimental effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on cancer incidence and outcomes. To date, the effect of DM and its treatment on prognosis in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains uninvestigated. We tested the hypothesis that DM and metformin use impact oncologic outcomes of patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC. METHODS Retrospective analysis of 2492 patients with UTUC treated at 23 institutions with RNU without neoadjuvant therapy. Cox regression models addressed the association of DM and metformin use with disease recurrence, cancer-specific mortality and any-cause mortality. RESULTS A total of 365 (14.3%) patients had DM and 194 (7.8%) patients used metformin. Within a median follow-up of 36 months, 663 (26.6%) patients experienced disease recurrence, 545 patients (21.9%) died of UTUC and 884 (35.5%) patients died from any cause. Diabetic patients who did not use metformin were at significantly higher risk of disease recurrence and cancer-specific death compared to non-diabetic patients and diabetic patients who used metformin. In multivariable Cox regression analyses, DM treated without metformin was associated with worse recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.44, 95% CI 1.10-1.90, p = 0.009) and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00, p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS Diabetic UTUC patients without metformin use have significantly worse oncologic outcomes than diabetics who used metformin and non-diabetics. The possible mechanism behind the impact of DM on UTUC biology and the potentially protective effect of metformin need further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rieken
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - E Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - L Kluth
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Q-D Trinh
- Division of Urologic Surgery and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - R K Lee
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - H Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - G Novara
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologic Sciences, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Italy
| | - V Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Y Lotan
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - J I Martinez-Salamanca
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - K Matsumoto
- Department of Urology, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - C Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - M Remzi
- Department of Urology, Landesklinikum Korneuburg, Korneuburg, Austria
| | - P I Karakiewicz
- Department of Urology, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - D S Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - A Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy
| | - A Kautzky-Willer
- Unit of Gender Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A Bachmann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - S F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Klatte T, Zigeuner R, Rouprêt M, Babjuk M, Capitanio U, Cha E, Colin P, Comploj E, Dalpiaz O, Fritsche HM, Herrmann T, Hora M, Hübner W, Merseburger A, Montorsi F, Nison L, Novara G, Roscigno M, Shariat S, Remzi M. 575 Segmental ureterectomy versus radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer of the ureter: A matched-pair analysis. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(13)61058-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
9
|
Mitropoulos D, Artibani W, Graefen M, Remzi M, Rouprêt M, Truss M. [Reporting and grading of complications after urologic surgical procedures: an ad hoc EAU guidelines panel assessment and recommendations]. Actas Urol Esp 2013; 37:1-11. [PMID: 22824080 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2012.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2012] [Accepted: 02/17/2012] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT The incidence of postoperative complications is still the most frequently used surrogate marker of quality in surgery, but no standard guidelines or criteria exist for reporting surgical complications in the area of urology. OBJECTIVE To review the available reporting systems used for urologic surgical complications, to establish a possible change in attitude towards reporting of complications using standardised systems, to assess systematically the Clavien-Dindo system when used for the reporting of complications related to urologic surgical procedures, to identify shortcomings in reporting complications, and to propose recommendations for the development and implementation of future reporting systems that are focused on patient-centred outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION Standardised systems for reporting and classification of surgical complications were identified through a systematic review of the literature. To establish a possible change in attitude towards reporting of complications related to urologic procedures, we performed a systematic literature search of all papers reporting complications after urologic surgery published in European Urology, Journal of Urology, Urology, BJU International, and World Journal of Urology in 1999-2000 and 2009-2010. Data identification for the systematic assessment of the Clavien-Dindo system currently used for the reporting of complications related to urologic surgical interventions involved a Medline/Embase search and the search engines of individual urologic journals and publishers using Clavien, urology, and complications as keywords. All selected papers were full-text retrieved and assessed; analysis was done based on structured forms. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS The systematic review of the literature for standardised systems used for reporting and classification of surgical complications revealed five such systems. As far as the attitude of urologists towards reporting of complications, a shift could be seen in the number of studies using most of the Martin criteria, as well as in the number of studies using either standardised criteria or the Clavien-Dindo system. The latter system was not properly used in 72 papers (35.3%). CONCLUSIONS Uniformed reporting of complications after urologic procedures will aid all those involved in patient care and scientific publishing (authors, reviewers, and editors). It will also contribute to the improvement of the scientific quality of papers published in the field of urologic surgery. When reporting the outcomes of urologic procedures, the committee proposes a series of quality criteria.
Collapse
|
10
|
Cha E, Shariat S, Kormaksson M, Novara G, Chromecki T, Fajkovic H, Lotan Y, Raman J, Remzi M, Kikuchi E, Pycha A, Montorsi F, Margulis V. Predicting clinical outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Journal of Men's Health 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jomh.2011.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
|
11
|
Speakman M, Ameye F, de la Taille A, de Rijke T, Gontero P, Haese A, Kil P, Meesen B, Perrin P, Remzi M, Schröder J, Tombal B, Volpe A. POD-02.07 Development of a Risk-Based Decision Model for Prostate CAncer Gene 3 (PCA3) Usage. Urology 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
12
|
Speakman M, Ameye F, de la Taille A, de Reijke T, Gontero P, Haese A, Kil P, Perrin P, Remzi M, Schröder J, Stoevelaar H, Volpe A. UP-02.172 The Appropriateness of Active Surveillance and the Impact of Prostate Cancer Gene 3 (PCA3) in Low Risk Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of Expert Opinion. Urology 2011. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.07.990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
13
|
Hutterer GC, Chromecki TF, Zigeuner R, Klatte T, Kampel-Kettner K, Pummer K, Remzi M, Mannweiler S. Evaluation of tumor-associated macrophages as a prognostic indicator in patients with papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2011.29.7_suppl.372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
372 Background: Prognostic indicators in papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) are not well defined. We evaluated the prognostic relevance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in patients with PRCC. Methods: PRCC specimens were re-evaluated by one blinded pathologist (SM), with respect to pT-classification (TNM 2002), nodal status, Fuhrman grade (I-IV), tumor size, subtype (type 1 or 2), tumor necrosis, and presence of TAM. Presence of TAM was associated with pathological parameters (chi-square and fisher's exact tests). Impact of TAM on cancer-specific survival (CSS) was assessed (Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test). A multivariate regression analysis including pT-stage, grade, vascular invasion, necrosis, tumor size, papillary subtype and TAM was performed with respect to CSS. Results: 177 patients operated for PRCC from 1984 to 2006, were evaluated. Presence of TAM was noted in 112/177 (63%) tumors and was significantly associated with favorable pathological parameters: low pT-classification (pT1a/b: 71/90, 79%; pT2: 14/31, 45%; pT3a/b: 27/56, 48%; p<0.001), node negative tumors (Nx/pN0: 111/170, 65% vs. pN1/2: 1/7, 14%; p=0.01), low grade (G1: 35/45, 78%; G2: 67/110, 61%; G3: 10/22, 45%; p=0.025), absence of vascular invasion (V0: 106/153, 69% vs. V1/2: 6/24, 25%; p<0.001), and papillary subtype (type 1: 64/87, 74% vs. 48/89, 54%; p=0.007), respectively. Median follow-up was 68.3 months. Five-year CSS probabilities for patients with TAM-positive tumors were 93.5%, compared with 72.5% in patients with TAM-negative tumors (p<0.001). Median survival was not reached in both groups. Multivariate analysis revealed node positive tumors (HR=2.4, 95%CI=1.1-5.0; p=0.025), distant metastases (HR=8.7, 95%CI=2.6-29.3; p<0.001), and tumor size (HR=1.2, 95%CI=1.0-1.3; p=0.03) as independent predictors of death from PRCC, whereas presence of TAM was independently associated with favorable outcome (HR=0.3, 95%CI=0.1-0.9, p=0.026). Conclusions: Presence of TAM was independently associated with a favorable outcome in patients with PRCC and was shown to reduce the risk of death from cancer by 66%. Presence of TAM should therefore be part of routine pathology reporting in PRCC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. C. Hutterer
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - T. F. Chromecki
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - R. Zigeuner
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - T. Klatte
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - K. Kampel-Kettner
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - K. Pummer
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M. Remzi
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S. Mannweiler
- Department of Urology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria; Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Weibl P, Klatte T, Kollarik B, Geryk B, Schüller G, Marberger M, Remzi M. 298 COMPLEX RENAL CYSTIC MASSES: INTERPERSONAL VARIABILITY OF BOSNIAK CLASSIFICATION IS SIGNIFICANT – FACT OR FICTION. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2010. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(10)60297-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
15
|
Hellenthal N, Shariat SF, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Roscigno M, Bolenz C, Remzi M, Weizer A, Zigeuner R, Koppie TM. Adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Results from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.5075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5075 Background: There is relatively little literature regarding the use of adjuvant chemotherapy following radical nephroureterectomy in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Our goal was to determine the incidence of receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients and the ensuing effect on overall- and cancer-specific survival. Methods: Using an international collaborative database, we identified 1390 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for non-metastatic UTUC between the years of 1992 and 2006. Of these, 542 (39%) patients were classified as high-risk (pT3N0, pT4N0, and/or lymph node positive). These patients were separated into two groups—those who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy—and were stratified by gender, age group, performance status, tumor grade and stage. Cox proportional hazard modeling and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to determine overall- and cancer-specific survival amongst the cohorts. Results: Of the high-risk patients, 121 (22%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was more commonly administered in the context of increased tumor grade and stage (p < 0.001). Median survival in the entire cohort was 24 months (range 0–231 months). There was no significant difference in overall- or cancer-specific survival between those who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy; however age, performance status, tumor grade, and tumor stage were significant predictors of both overall and cancer-specific survival. Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy is infrequently utilized in the treatment of patients with high-risk UTUC after nephroureterectomy. Despite this, it appears that adjuvant chemotherapy confers minimal impact on overall- or cancer-specific survival in this group. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Hellenthal
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - S. F. Shariat
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - V. Margulis
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - P. I. Karakiewicz
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M. Roscigno
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - C. Bolenz
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M. Remzi
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - A. Weizer
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - R. Zigeuner
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - T. M. Koppie
- University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA; University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX; University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada; Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy; Universitatsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Klatte T, Remzi M, Said JW, Haitel A, Kabbinavar FF, Waldert M, de Martino M, Marberger M, Belldegrun AS, Pantuck AJ. A nomogram predicting disease-specific survival after nephrectomy for papillary renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.5091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
5091 Background: Whereas multiple nomograms have been developed to assess outcomes of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma, a model to assess prognosis of papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) has not yet been developed. After data collection and slide review of a large cohort of patients, the aim of this study was to develop and to internally validate a nomogram for prediction of disease-specific survival for PRCC. Methods: Out of 2,687 patients who underwent surgery for a renal tumor between 1989 and 2008 at two institutions, 258 (10%) were found to have PRCC. H&E slides were reviewed by one uro-pathologist at each institution for papillary sub-type, tumor grade, microvascular invasion, sarcomatoid features, collecting system invasion and presence and extent of tumor necrosis. A nomogram was constructed as a graphical representation of significant variables of disease-specific survival in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were assessed, both utilizing bootstrapping to obtain relatively unbiased estimates. Results: After a median follow-up of 35 months, 49 PRCC-related deaths (19%) had occurred. In univariate analysis, incidental detection, T, N, M stage, grade, microvascular invasion, collecting system invasion, papillary sub-type, sarcomatoid features, and necrosis were all associated with prognosis. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, however, identified incidental detection, T stage, M stage, microvascular invasion, and necrosis, but not papillary sub-type as independent prognostic factors of disease-specific survival. These variables formed the basis of the nomogram that predicted 5-year disease-specific survival probability. The nomogram predicted well, with a bootstrapped corrected concordance index of 0.93, and showed good calibration. Conclusions: A highly accurate tool utilizing basic clinical and pathological information for predicting disease-specific survival was developed specifically for PRCC. This tool should be helpful for identification of the subset of PRCC patients with aggressive clinical behavior, and may contribute to the ability to individualize postoperative surveillance and therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Klatte
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. Remzi
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - J. W. Said
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - A. Haitel
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - M. Waldert
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. de Martino
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | - M. Marberger
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - A. J. Pantuck
- University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; UCLA, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Haese A, Chun F, De La Taille A, Van Poppel H, Marberger M, Mulders P, Abbou C, Stenzl A, Huland H, Tinzl M, Remzi M, Feyerabend S, Van Gils M, Stillebroer A, Schalken J. PCA3 REPRESENTS A CLINICALLY MEANINGFUL PREDICTOR OF PROSTATE CANCER AT REPEAT BIOPSY. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(08)60278-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
18
|
Remzi M, Waldert M, Klingler H, Haitel A, Mueller L, Marberger M. OUTCOME AND RE-EVALUATION BY IMMUNO HISTOCHEMICAL STAINING OF RENAL ONCOCYTOMAS AND CHROMOPHOBE RENAL CELL CANCER (RCC). ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(08)60245-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
19
|
Schmidbauer J, Remzi M, Lindenau G, Susani M, Marberger M. OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY AND HEXAMINOLEVULINATE FLUORESCENCE CYSTOSCOPY IN DETECTING UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(08)60031-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
Tumor size is a prognostic marker and correlates to survival after surgical therapy. Of 287 patients with small (<or=4 cm) renal tumors, 19.5% had a benign lesion and thus harmless. All others were renal cell cancers; 4.9% of tumors were detected because of metastases and consecutively treated. Tumors with a diameter <or=3 cm showed a tumor stage >or=pT3a in 10.9%, a high Fuhrman grade >or=3, multifocality in 8.5%, and metastases in 2.4%. Tumors with a diameter of 3.1-4 cm showed dramatically more aggressive parameters; 35.7% had stage >or=pT3a, 25.5% Fuhrman grade >or=G3, and 8.4% metastases (M+). However, evaluation of the tumor diameter on CT has an error of about +/-0.3 cm, which will lead to an even more pronounced error in volume determination. Therefore, determination of growth in follow-up imaging is unreliable. With the exception of the typical angiomyolipoma, determination of dignity for small solid kidney lesions is unreliable even with modern imaging. Only 17% of 80 benign lesions in our series were assessed as benign on preoperative CT. Thus, preoperative evaluation not only based on imaging seems to be valuable, especially in patients with higher surgical risk. Percutaneous renal mass biopsy has an accuracy of over 90% for detecting benign lesions and can influence therapeutic decisions, especially in patients with higher surgical risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Remzi
- Urologische Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Universität, A-1090 Wien.
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Remzi M, Müller L, Klingler H, Waldert M, Kusolitsch S, Katzenbeisser D, Marberger M. 794 MID-TERM FOLLOW UP (5 YEARS) OF LAPAROSCOPIC NEPHROURETERECTOMY COMPARED TO OPEN NEPHROURETERECTOMY FOR UPPER URINARY TRACT TRANSITIONAL CELL CANCER. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(07)60789-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
22
|
Remzi M, Waldert M, Djavan B. Preoperative Nomograms and Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) for Identification of Surgical Candidates. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euus.2005.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
23
|
Remzi M, Klingler HC, Tinzl MV, Fong YK, Lodde M, Kiss B, Marberger M. Morbidity of laparoscopic extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal radical prostatectomy verus open retropubic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2005; 48:83-9; discussion 89. [PMID: 15967256 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2005] [Accepted: 03/18/2005] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Morbidity and postoperative pain after extraperitoneal (E-LRPE) and transperitoneal (T-LRPE) laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was compared to open extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (O-RPE). MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2002 and October 2003, we evaluated 41 E-LRPE, 39 T-LRPE and 41 O-RPE prospectively. All operations were performed as standard procedures by the same group of surgeons and perioperative results and complications were evaluated. Pain management was performed with tramadol 50-100 mg on demand, and no other form of anaesthesia was given. Postoperative pain was assessed daily in all patients quantifying analgesic requirement and evaluation of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). All patients had at least a 12 month follow-up. RESULTS Mean age, prostate volume, PSA and Gleason score were comparable between all three groups (p>0.05). Mean blood loss was lower with laparoscopy (189+/-140 and 290+/-254 ml), as compared to 385+/-410 ml for O-RPE (p=0.002). However, mean operating times were significantly longer in L-TRPE (279+/-70 min) as compared to E-LRPE (217+/-51 min) and O-RPE (195+/-72 min) (p<0.001), but E-LRPE and O-RPE showed no statistical difference (p=0.1143). Average VAS score on the 1st and 5th postoperative day for E-LRPE versus T-LRPE versus O-RPE was 4.9+/-1.0 versus 7.8+/-1.5 versus 5.8+/-1.9 and 1.6+/-0.9 versus 2.3+/-1.2 versus 2.3+/-0.9 respectively, which was significant lower (p=0.02) between E-LRPE versus T-LRPE (p<0.001) and O-RPE (p=0.008), but equal (p=0.655) between T-LRPE and O-RPE since postoperative day 3. Mean tramadol analgesic consumption within the first postoperative week was 290 versus 490 versus 300 mg respectively, which was statistical different between E-LRPE and T-LRPE (p<0.001), O-RPE and T-LRPE (p<0.001), but not between E-LRPE and O-RPE (p=0.550). Statistical analysis revealed a strong correlation of urinary leakage with increased postoperative pain (p=0.029) in all groups, especially for T-LRPE (p=0.007). Likewise, increased operating times (>240 min) were associated with increased post-operative pain (p=0.049). Full continence defined as no pads at one year was achieved in 36/41 (88%, E-LRPE) versus 33/39 (85%, T-LRPE) versus 33/41 (81%, O-RPE), respectively (p=0.2). CONCLUSION E-LRPE resulted in a significant subjective (VAS Score, p<0.001) and objective (analgetic consumption, p<0.001) pain reduction compared to T-LRPE, but only in VAS Score compared to O-RPE (p=0.008). Analgetic consumption during first postoperative week was equal in E-LRPE (290 mg) and O-RPE (300 mg) (p=0.550). Shorter operating times, lower urinary leakage rates, lower stricture rates and lower blood loss in E-LRPE compared to T-LRPE are mainly explained due to the long learning curve in LRPE, which we did not overcome yet, and not due to the approach (extraperitoneal versus transperitoneal).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Remzi
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
The issue of performing tissue sampling from the vesicourethral anastomotic area postradical prostatectomy (transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy) after radical surgical treatment of local disease has failed, still remains controversial. We review a selection of articles that evaluate this procedure as well as newer diagnostic modalities and we discuss how this technique may have a position in our treatment dilemmas in cases with biochemical failure of undetermined origin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Anagnostou
- Department of Urology, Athens General Hospital G. Gennimatas, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Seitz C, Remzi M, Lodde M, Waldert M, Dobrovits M, Kramer G, Marberger M. 182Delay in ESWL treatment after a first colic episode correlates with decelerated ureteral stone clearance. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(05)80191-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
26
|
Waldert M, Lusuardi L, Remzi M, Seitz C, Waldhauser F, Marberger M, Djavan B. 385Long term results of testosterone treatment for micropenis in early childhood. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2005. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(05)80391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
27
|
Klingler HC, Lodde M, Pycha A, Remzi M, Janetschek G, Marberger M. Modified Laparoscopic Nephroureterectomy for Treatment of Upper Urinary Tract Transitional Cell Cancer Is Not Associated with an Increased Risk of Tumour Recurrence. Eur Urol 2003; 44:442-7. [PMID: 14499678 DOI: 10.1016/s0302-2838(03)00314-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Laparoscopic nephroureterectomy reduces the morbidity of surgical management of urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma (TCC), but a potentially increased risk for local tumour spreading was reported. We evaluated results obtained from patients undergoing a modified laparoscopic approach and open procedures in this respect. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2000 and March 2002 we performed 19 modified laparoscopic nephroureterectomies (LNU) with open intact specimen retrieval in conjunction with open distal ureter and bladder cuff removal and 15 open standard nephroureterectomies (ONU). Staging lymphadenectomy was performed in 14/19 (73.7%) patients with LNU and in 6/15 (40.0%) with ONU. In all patients operating time, blood loss, complications, pain score (VAS) and data in respect to tumour recurrence were analysed. Mean follow-up was 22.1+/-9.2 (range 14-34) months for LNU and 23.1+/-8.8 (14-36) for ONU respectively. RESULTS In LNU and ONU pathological features were 12 pT1 vs. 10 pT1, 2 pT2 vs. 2 pT2 and 5 pT3 vs. 3 pT3, respectively. All patients had TCC and were R0 at final histology. Four patients with LNU had lymph node involvement, one in ONU. LNU had decreased operating times (p=0.057), blood loss (p=0.018), complications (p=0.001) and VAS scores (p=0.001). One tumour recurrence occurred in LNU, associated with a pT3b pN2 G3 TCC at final histology. One patient with ONU had local tumour recurrence at the site of the bladder cuff. No port-site metastasis occurred during follow-up with LNU. CONCLUSION Improved peri-operative results and same cancer control as compared to open surgery by this modified LNU was not associated with an increased risk for tumour recurrence, since strict "non-touch" preparation, avoiding of urine spillage and intact specimen retrieval prevents tumour seeding. However, results from long term studies are still warranted to clarify this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Klingler
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Abstract
PURPOSE Aim of this prospective study was to determine whether patients with a higher body mass index (BMI) will benefit more from laparoscopic procedures in respect to postoperative morbidity and pain as compared to regular patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 1999 and October 2001, we performed 36 laparoscopic radical nephrectomies and 18 nephron sparing partial nephrectomies for renal cell carcinoma and 6 nephrectomies for benign disease (group 1, n=60). In addition, we performed 24 open radical nephrectomies and 18 nephron spearing interventions for renal cell carcinoma (group 2, n=42). Mean age was 59+/-17.9 years and average BMI was 27.1+/-3.3 kg/m(2) in the entire group. All techniques were evaluated for intraoperative results and complications. Postoperative morbidity was assessed in all patients by quantifying pain medication and by daily evaluation of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS Mean hospitalisation time in group 1 as compared to group 2 was 10.1 days versus 5.4 days, average operating time was 273 minutes versus 187 minutes, mean length of skin incision was 7.2 cm versus 30.8 cm. Overall analgesic consumption was lower in the laparoscopic group (190 mg versus 590 mg, p<0.001), in patients with a BMI >28 kg/m(2) the difference was even more pronounced (160 mg versus 210 mg, p=0.032). In group 1, patients with a BMI >28 kg/m(2) had significantly less pain on the first and fourth postoperative day in a linear regression analysis (VAS1=10.714-0.218 BMI; r=0.688 (p<0.001) and VAS4=3.98-0.09 BMI, r=0.519 (p<0.001), respectively). In group 1, 3/60 (5.0%) and in group 2, 5/42 (11.9%) complications occurred, no difference was found in respect to a high BMI (p=0.411). CONCLUSION Patients with a higher BMI (cut-off >28 kg/m(2)) benefit more from laparoscopy than slim patients in respect to postoperative pain and morbidity but do not experience more complications. Consequently, reluctance to perform laparoscopic procedures in patients with a higher BMI is no longer justified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H C Klingler
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Anagnostou T, Djavan B, Lymperopoulos K, Polyzois K, Alavi S, Remzi M, Lykourinas M. Magnetic resonance using body coil and enhanced spin echo sequence imaging in evaluating local recurrence following radical prostatectomy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2003. [DOI: 10.1016/s1569-9056(03)80086-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
30
|
Remzi M, Djavan B, Wammack R, Momeni M, Seitz C, Erne B, Dobrovits M, Alavi S, Marberger M. Can total and transition zone volume of the prostate determine whether to perform a repeat biopsy? Urology 2003; 61:161-6. [PMID: 12559289 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(02)02099-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the ability of total prostate (TP) and transition zone (TZ) volume to predict the outcome of a repeat prostate biopsy in patients with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 4 to 10 ng/mL. METHODS A total of 1137 patients were included and underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided needle sextant and two transition zone biopsies of the prostate. All patients with a prior negative biopsy (benign prostatic tissue) underwent a repeat biopsy after 6 weeks. The TP and TZ volumes of the prostate were measured by transrectal ultrasonography. RESULTS Of the 1137 patients, prostate cancer was diagnosed in 364 (32%), in 276 (24.2%) after the first biopsy and in 88 (7.7%) after the repeated biopsy. The TP and TZ volumes were larger in the patients with prostate cancer detected on the repeated biopsy (P <0.0001). Using a cutoff for TP volume of less than 20 cm3 and greater than 80 cm3 and for TZ volume of less than 9 cm3 and greater than 41 cm3 would have spared 7.1% and 10% of repeated biopsies, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The probability for a positive repeat prostate biopsy increases in a logarithmic function for larger prostates, as well as for larger TP and, especially, for larger TZ volumes. The probability of finding prostate cancer on a repeat biopsy in prostates with small (less than 20 cm3) and large (greater than 79 cm3) TP, as well as in small (less than 9.3 cm3) and large (greater than 41 cm3) TZ volumes, was very low. Therefore, a repeat prostate biopsy within 6 weeks is unnecessary. These patients should be followed up by serial PSA determination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Remzi
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Wammack R, Djavan B, Remzi M, Susani M, Marberger M. Morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy in patients receiving immunosuppression. Urology 2001; 58:1004-7. [PMID: 11744477 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(01)01406-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To prospectively evaluate the safety and early and delayed morbidity of transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsies in patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy. METHODS A total of 59 men receiving immunosuppressive agents after kidney transplantation, with a total prostate-specific antigen level between 4 and 10 ng/mL, were prospectively studied. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided sextant biopsy plus two additional transition zone biopsies. Biopsy samples were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during TRUS and digital rectal examination. The immediate and delayed morbidity, patient satisfaction, and complication rates were recorded and compared with the morbidity data recorded in the same period from 1051 men in the European Prostate Cancer Detection study. RESULTS Of the 59 subjects, prostate cancer was detected in 17; 231 men were found to have cancer in the European Prostate Cancer Detection Study. Minor or no discomfort was observed in 88% and 92% of the transplant recipients and controls, respectively (P = 0.31). Twelve percent versus 8% experienced pain. Early morbidity included rectal bleeding (2.6% versus 2.1%, P = 0.19), severe hematuria (0.8% versus 0.7%, P = 0.08), and moderate to severe vasovagal episodes (1.9% versus 2.8%, P = 0.04). Late morbidity included fever (3.5% versus 2.9%, P = 0.1), hematospermia (11.0% versus 9.8%, P = 0.1), recurrent mild hematuria (17.4% versus 16.8%, P = 0.08), persistent dysuria (6.4% versus 7.2%, P = 0.2), and urinary tract infections (12.0% versus 10.9%, P = 0.08). Major complications were rare: urosepsis (0% versus 0.1%). CONCLUSIONS The results of our study demonstrate that TRUS-guided biopsy of the prostate is generally well tolerated, with minor morbidity, in patients receiving immunosuppression. No differences were noted in pain apprehension or early and delayed morbidity, suggesting that TRUS-guided biopsies can be performed safely in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Wammack
- Department ofUrology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Djavan B, Waldert M, Zlotta A, Dobronski P, Seitz C, Remzi M, Borkowski A, Schulman C, Marberger M. Safety and morbidity of first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies: results of a prospective European prostate cancer detection study. J Urol 2001; 166:856-60. [PMID: 11490233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We prospectively evaluate the safety, morbidity and complication rates for first and repeat transrectal ultrasound guided prostate needle biopsies. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection Study 1,051 men, with total prostate specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng./ml., underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy plus 2 additional transition zone biopsies. Biopsy samples were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. All 820 patients with biopsy samples negative for prostate cancer underwent re-biopsy after 6 weeks. Immediate and delayed (range 1 to 7 days) morbidity, patient satisfaction and complication rates were recorded. RESULTS Of the 1,051 subjects the initial biopsy was positive for prostate cancer in 231 and negative, including benign prostatic hyperplasia or benign tissue, in 820. Of these 820 patients prostate cancer was detected in 10% (83) on re-biopsy. Minor or no discomfort was observed in 92% and 89% of patients at first and re-biopsy, respectively (p = 0.29). Immediate morbidity was minor and included rectal bleeding (2.1% versus 2.4%, p = 0.13), mild hematuria (62% versus 57%, p = 0.06), severe hematuria (0.7% versus 0.5%, p = 0.09) and moderate to severe vasovagal episodes (2.8% versus 1.4%, respectively, p = 0.03). Delayed morbidity of first and re-biopsy was comprised of fever (2.9% versus 2.3%, p = 0.08), hematospermia (9.8% versus 10.2%, p = 0.1), recurrent mild hematuria (15.9% versus 16.6%, p = 0.06), persistent dysuria (7.2% versus 6.8%, p = 0.12) and urinary tract infection (10.9% versus 11.3%, respectively, p = 0.07). Major complications were rare and included urosepsis (0.1% versus 0%) and rectal bleeding that required intervention (0% versus 0.1%, respectively). Furthermore, an age dependent pattern of pain apprehension during biopsy was observed with the highest scores in patients younger than 60 years. CONCLUSIONS Transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy is generally well tolerated with minor morbidity only rarely requiring treatment. Re-biopsy can be performed 6 weeks later with no significant difference in pain or morbidity. Patients younger than 60 years should be counseled in regard to a higher level of discomfort, and local and topical anesthesia if desired.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Djavan B, Mazal P, Zlotta A, Wammack R, Ravery V, Remzi M, Susani M, Borkowski A, Hruby S, Boccon-Gibod L, Schulman CC, Marberger M. Pathological features of prostate cancer detected on initial and repeat prostate biopsy: results of the prospective European Prostate Cancer Detection study. Prostate 2001; 47:111-7. [PMID: 11340633 DOI: 10.1002/pros.1053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We evaluated pathological features of prostate cancer detected on repeat prostate biopsy in men with a serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level between 4 and 10 ng/ml who were diagnosed with benign prostatic tissue after an initial biopsy and compared them to those cancers detected on initial prostate biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective European prostate cancer detection study, 1,051 men with a total PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/ml underwent transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided sextant biopsy and two additional transition zone biopsies. All subjects whose biopsy samples were negative for prostate cancer (CaP) underwent a repeat biopsy after 6 weeks. Those with clinically localized cancers underwent radical prostatectomy. Pathological and clinical features of patients diagnosed with cancer on either initial or repeat biopsy and clinically organ confined disease who agreed to undergo radical prostatectomy were compared. RESULTS Initial biopsy was positive (CaP) in 231 of 1,051 enrolled subjects and negative (benign histology) in 820 subjects. Of these 820 subjects, CaP was detected in 10% (83/820) upon repeat biopsy. Of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy, 148/231 (64%) and 56/83 (67.5%) had clinically localized disease, respectively, and were offered radical prostatectomy. 10/148 (6.7%) and 3/56 (5.3%), respectively, opted for radiation therapy and thus, 138/148 (93.3%) and 53/56 (94.7%), respectively, underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. There were statistically significant differences with respect to multifocality (P = 0.009) and cancer location (P < 0.001) with cancers on repeat biopsy showing a lower rate of multifocality and a more apico-dorsal location. In contrast, there were no differences with respect to stage (P = 0.2), Gleason score (P = 0.36), percentage Gleason grade 4/5 (P = 0.1), serum PSA (P = 0.62), and patient age (P = 0.517). CONCLUSIONS At least 10% of patients with negative prostatic biopsy results will be diagnosed with CaP on repeat biopsy. Despite differences in location and multifocality, pathological and biochemical features of cancers detected on initial and repeat biopsy are similar, suggesting similar biological behavior and thus advocating for a repeat prostate biopsy in case of a negative finding on initial biopsy. Cancers missed on initial biopsy and subsequently detected on repeat biopsy are located in a more apico-dorsal location. Repeat biopsies should thus be directed to this rather spared area in order to improve cancer detection rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Remzi M, Lenglinger J, Erne B, Bagmet N, Függer R, Bischof G, Wrba F, Jakesz R, Miholic J. [Effect of the learning phase on safety and efficiency of laparoscopic fundoplication]. Chirurg 2001; 72:261-5. [PMID: 11317444 DOI: 10.1007/s001040051301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of laparoscopic techniques into surgical practice has required a learning process on the part of the surgeons involved. The duration, morbidity, and functional outcome of laparoscopic fundoplication were evaluated in our institution's first 146 cases. During a 34-month period the patients underwent laparoscopic Nissen (n = 102) or Toupet (n = 44) fundoplication. Conversion to open access was necessary in 7 cases, re-operation for complications in 2, all among the first 40 cases of the series. The median operating time was 165 min (range 75-375) in the first 40 cases, and 105 min (range 50-235) thereafter (P < 0.001). Body mass index, grade of esophagitis, and the surgeon's experience were independent predictors of the operating time. One hundred and thirty-four patients (92%) could be evaluated for recurrence of reflux, which was encountered in 2 (5%) of the first 40 cases and 8 (8%) of 94 patients in the later group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Remzi
- Abteilung für Allgemeinchirurgie, Universitätsklinik für Chirurgie, Wien
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Djavan B, Seitz C, Roehrborn CG, Remzi M, Fakhari M, Waldert M, Basharkhah A, Planz B, Harik M, Marberger M. Targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus alpha-blockade in benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes at 18 months. Urology 2001; 57:66-70. [PMID: 11164146 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00854-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare directly the efficacy, safety, and durability of targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy with that of alpha-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. METHODS In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 52 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia received terazosin treatment and 51 underwent microwave treatment under topical anesthesia. The patient evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score before microwave treatment or initiation of terazosin treatment and at periodic intervals thereafter up to 18 months. RESULTS The mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score all improved significantly in both groups by 6 months. However, the magnitude of improvement was significantly greater in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The significant between-group differences observed at 6 months in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score were fully maintained at 18 months, at which time the improvements in these three outcome measures were significantly greater (P <0.0005), by 35%, 22%, and 43%, respectively, in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The actuarial rate of treatment failure at 18 months was significantly greater by sevenfold in the terazosin group. Adverse events were generally infrequent and readily manageable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS Although the initial onset of terazosin action was more rapid, the longer term clinical outcomes of targeted microwave treatment were markedly superior. The more favorable results in patients who underwent microwave treatment were maintained for at least 18 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Remzi M, Buchsteiner R, Djavan B, Hittmair A, Seitz C, Klingler C, Marberger M. Unilateral nondisseminated actinomycosis of the hydrocele wall: a case report of actinomycosis in the urogenital tract. Tech Urol 2000; 6:228-30. [PMID: 10963497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Actinomycosis of the urogenital tract is rare and predominantly an infectious disease of horses, cattle, swine, and humans. This case report describes isolated actinomycosis of the hydrocele wall presenting as an inflamed right-sighted hydrocele.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Remzi
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Djavan B, Zlotta AR, Ekane S, Remzi M, Kramer G, Roumeguère T, Etemad M, Wolfram R, Schulman CC, Marberger M. Is one set of sextant biopsies enough to rule out prostate Cancer? Influence of transition and total prostate volumes on prostate cancer yield. Eur Urol 2000; 38:218-24. [PMID: 10895015 DOI: 10.1159/000020282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although the sextant biopsy technique has been widely used, concern has arisen that this method may not include an adequate sampling of the prostate, especially for large prostate volumes. We conducted a multicenter study in patients with PSA levels <10 ng/ml to determine the influence of the total and transition zone (TZ) volumes of the prostate for predicting whether one single set of biopsies was sufficient to rule out prostate cancer (PCa). These parameters were evaluated in patients in whom PCa was found after one set of systematic sextant biopsies and those in whom PCa was found after a repeat biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 1,018 patients were included in this study. All underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided needle sextant and two TZ biopsies of the prostate. Total and TZ volumes of the prostate were measured (prolate ellipsoid method). From this cohort, all patients in whom a benign disease was found after the first set of biopsies underwent a second similar set of biopsies within 6 weeks. Only patients with PCa were included in this study, whether diagnosed on first or repeat biopsy. Uni- and multivariate statistical analysis using the SAS system (Cary, N.C., USA) and ROC curves were used to compare patients in whom the diagnosis was performed after the first set of biopsies and those who required a second set. RESULTS Of the 1,018 patients, 344 (33.8%) had PCa diagnosed, 285 (28%) after the first set of biopsies, and 59 (8.1%) on repeat biopsy. As compared to patients diagnosed with PCa after the first set of biopsies, patients diagnosed after the second set had larger total prostate and TZ volumes (43.1+/-13.0 vs. 32.5+/-10.6 cm(3), p<0.0001 and 20.5+/-8.3 vs. 12.8+/-6.0 cm(3), p<0.0001). ROC curves showed that total and TZ volumes of 45 and 22. 5 cm(3), respectively, provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for discriminating between patients diagnosed with PCa after the first from those diagnosed after a second set. CONCLUSION In patients with total prostate volume >45 cm(3) and TZ >22.5 cm(3), a single set of sextant biopsies may not be sufficient to rule out PCa. In these patients, a repeat biopsy should be considered in case of a negative first biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Djavan B, Zlotta A, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, Basharkhah A, Schulman CC, Marberger M. Optimal predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 1,051 men. J Urol 2000; 163:1144-8; discussion 1148-9. [PMID: 10737484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We compare the ability of total prostate specific antigen (PSA), percent free PSA, PSA density and transition zone PSA density to predict the outcome of repeat prostatic biopsy in men with serum total PSA 4 to 10 ng./ml. who were diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia after initial biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this prospective study 1,051 men with total PSA 4 to 10 ng./ml. underwent transrectal ultrasound guided sextant biopsy with 2 additional transition zone biopsies. In 254 subjects biopsy specimens were also obtained from suspicious areas identified during transrectal ultrasound and digital rectal examination. All subjects with biopsy specimens negative for prostate cancer underwent repeat biopsy 6 weeks after initial biopsy. The ability of total PSA, percent free PSA, PSA density and transition zone PSA density to improve the diagnostic power of PSA testing was assessed with univariate and multivariate analyses as well as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS Initial biopsy was positive (prostate cancer) in 231 and negative (benign prostatic hyperplasia) in 820 of the 1,051 subjects. Prostate cancer was detected on repeat biopsy in 10% of subjects (83 of 820) with negative initial biopsy. Percent free PSA and transition zone PSA density were the most accurate predictors of prostate cancer in these subjects. At a cutoff of 30% percent free PSA would have detected 90% of cancers (sensitivity) and eliminated 50% of unnecessary repeat biopsies (specificity). Sensitivity and specificity of transition zone PSA density at a cutoff of 0.26 ng./ml./cc was 78% and 52%, respectively. ROC curve analysis also showed that percent free PSA was a significantly better predictor of repeat biopsy results than total PSA, PSA density and transition zone PSA density. The area under the ROC curve was 74.5% for percent free PSA, 69.1% for transition zone PSA density, 61.8% for PSA density and 60.3% for total PSA. CONCLUSIONS At least 10% of patients with negative initial prostatic biopsy results will be diagnosed with prostate cancer on repeat biopsy. Percent free PSA and transition zone PSA density enhance the specificity of PSA testing compared to total PSA or PSA density when determining which patients should undergo repeat biopsy. Repeat biopsy should be performed in patients with percent free PSA less than 30% or transition zone PSA density 0.26 ng./ml./cc or greater. In our study percent free PSA was the most accurate predictor of prostate cancer in repeat biopsy specimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Djavan B, Bursa B, Basharkhah A, Seitz C, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, Hruby S, Marberger M. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen as an outcome predictor of targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy. Urology 2000; 55:51-7. [PMID: 10654894 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00364-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate pretreatment serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) as an outcome predictor of targeted microwave thermotherapy. METHODS Seventy-one patients with lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy using the Targis system. Outcomes 12 months after treatment were evaluated by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), and quality-of-life (QOL) score. The ability of PSA to predict outcomes was evaluated by linear and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS Higher pretreatment PSA levels were significantly predictive of an absolute IPSS change of -7.5 or less for patients with moderate baseline symptoms or - 15 or less for those with severe baseline symptoms; an absolute Qmax change of 5 mL/s or greater; an absolute QOL score change of -3 or less; an IPSS at 12 months of 7 or less; a Qmax at 12 months of greater than 12 mL/s; and a QOL score at 12 months of 1 or less. Nevertheless, even without taking pretreatment PSA into account, most patients benefitted substantially from targeted microwave thermotherapy. Thus, 74%, 71%, and 79% of all eligible patients improved 50% or more in IPSS, Qmax, and QOL score, respectively, at 12 months compared with baseline. No significant association between PSA and either prostate or transition zone volume could be demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS Most patients benefit substantially from targeted microwave thermotherapy. However, higher PSA levels are significantly predictive of more favorable outcomes. This association may reflect patient-to-patient differences in the relative abundance of PSA-producing epithelial cells in the transition zone of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Djavan B, Zlotta AR, Remzi M, Ghawidel K, Bursa B, Hruby S, Wolfram R, Schulman CC, Marberger M. Total and transition zone prostate volume and age: how do they affect the utility of PSA-based diagnostic parameters for early prostate cancer detection? Urology 1999; 54:846-52. [PMID: 10565745 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00329-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 62] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To define the role of total prostate (TP) volume, transition zone (TZ) volume, and age as determinants of the utility of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based diagnostic parameters for early detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in a prospective multicenter study. METHODS The study participants were 974 consecutive men with serum total PSA (tPSA) levels of 4 to 10 ng/mL who were referred for early PCa detection or lower urinary tract symptoms. All patients underwent prostate ultrasound examination and sextant biopsy with two additional TZ biopsies. In patients with negative initial biopsies, repeated biopsies were performed at 6 weeks. tPSA, the free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA), PSA density of the TZ (PSA-TZ), PSA density (PSAD), and PSA velocity (PSAV) were determined and compared across TP volume strata of 30 cm3 or less and greater than 30 cm3, TZ volume strata of 20 cm3 or less and greater than 20 cm3, and various age groups to evaluate the need for volume and/or age-specific reference ranges. RESULTS PCa was found in 345 (35.4%) of 974 patients and benign prostatic tissue was found in 629 (64.6%) of 947 patients. Across TP volume strata, significantly higher values of tPSA (P <0.01), PSA-TZ, PSAD (P <0.001), and PSAV (P <0.05) and lower values of f/t PSA (P <0.001) were observed in patients with PCa than in those without PCa. Similar results were obtained with respect to TZ volume strata, except in the case of PSAV (P <0.05). tPSA, PSA-TZ, and PSAD were significantly higher (P <0.05) in patients with PCa than in those without PCa for all corresponding age ranges. In patients with PCa, f/t PSA was significantly lower (P <0.001) within the same age ranges. Within each group (PCa or benign), f/t PSA, PSAD, PSA-TZ, and PSAV values were unaffected by age strata. However, PSA parameters dependent on prostate volume (PSAD, PSA-TZ) were statistically lower (P <0.001) in prostates with a higher TP volume (greater than 30 cm3) and TZ volume (greater than 20 cm3); f/t PSA values were unaffected by TP and TZ volumes. CONCLUSIONS f/t PSA and PSA-TZ were the most powerful parameters to differentiate between benign prostatic tissue and PCa. f/t PSA was the sole parameter unaffected by age and prostate volume. We believe new volume-specific cutpoints, as presented in the current study, should be employed when using PSAD and PSA-TZ for the early detection of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Djavan B, Bursa B, Seitz C, Soeregi G, Remzi M, Basharkhah A, Wolfram R, Marberger M. Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1), IGF-1 density, and IGF-1/PSA ratio for prostate cancer detection. Urology 1999; 54:603-6. [PMID: 10510914 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00280-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Recent studies suggest an association between increased serum levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and an increased risk of prostate cancer (PCa). We prospectively analyzed the value of IGF-1, IGF-density (IGFD), and IGF-1/prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio for early detection of prostate cancer. METHODS IGF-1, IGFD, and IGF-1/PSA ratio were determined prospectively during an 11-month period in the serum from 245 consecutive white men with PSA levels between 2.5 and 15 ng/mL. Octant biopsy (including transition zone biopsy) was performed. A second biopsy was performed 6 weeks later if the first biopsy was negative. Prostate volume was measured using transrectal ultrasound and the prolate ellipsoid method. Receiver operating characteristic curves were performed to compare tests. RESULTS No evidence of malignancy was found in 174 patients (71%), and PCa was found in 71 (29%). The mean age for patients with no evidence of malignancy and those with PCa was 67.7+/-9 and 65.7+/-6 years, respectively (P = 0.17). IGF-1, IGFD, IGF-1/PSA ratio, and PSA were significantly higher in patients with PCa than in those with benign disease (P = 0.03, P = 0.045, P = 0.001, and P = 0.018, respectively). The area under the curve value derived from the receiver operating characteristic curves for IGF-1/PSA ratio, PSA, IGFD, and IGF-1 was 71%, 61%, 60%, and 58%, respectively. At 95% sensitivity, the specificity of the IGF-1/PSA ratio was significantly greater than that of all other parameters (P<0.0001 ). An IGF-1/PSA cutoff value of 25 afforded a 95% sensitivity for detecting PCa and would have avoided unnecessary biopsies in 24.1% of patients. CONCLUSIONS Although IGF-1 and IGFD were unable to enhance the performance of PSA in our study, the IGF-1/PSA ratio significantly improved PCa detection over the use of PSA alone. Thus, increased IGF-1 levels (i.e., the IGF-1/PSA ratio) may not only be associated with an increased PCa risk but may also be a useful tool for early detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Djavan B, Zlotta A, Kratzik C, Remzi M, Seitz C, Schulman CC, Marberger M. PSA, PSA density, PSA density of transition zone, free/total PSA ratio, and PSA velocity for early detection of prostate cancer in men with serum PSA 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL. Urology 1999; 54:517-22. [PMID: 10475364 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00153-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 104] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To enhance the specificity of prostate cancer (PCa) detection and reduce unnecessary biopsies in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL, we prospectively evaluated various PSA-based diagnostic parameters. METHODS This study included 273 consecutive men with serum PSA of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL referred for early PCa detection or lower urinary tract symptoms. All men underwent prostate ultrasound and sextant biopsy with two additional transition zone (TZ) biopsies. If the first biopsies were negative, repeated biopsies were performed at 6 weeks. Total PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA density of the transition zone (PSA-TZ), free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA), and PSA velocity (PSAV) were determined, and the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of these various parameters were calculated. RESULTS Of 273 patients, 207 had histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 66 had PCa. f/t PSA and PSA-TZ were the most powerful predictors of PCa, followed by PSA, PSAD, and PSAV. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves for f/t PSA and PSA-TZ were 74.9% and 70.1%, respectively. With a 95% sensitivity for PCa detection, an f/t PSA cutoff of 41% and a PSA-TZ cutoff of 0.095 would result in the lowest number of unnecessary biopsies (29.3% and 17.2% specificity for f/t PSA and PSA-TZ, respectively) compared with all other PSA-related parameters evaluated. CONCLUSIONS Compared with standard total PSA assays, f/t PSA and PSA-TZ significantly enhance the sensitivity and specificity of PCa detection in a referral patient population with a total PSA of 2.5 to 4.0 ng/mL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Djavan B, Remzi M, Zlotta AR, Seitz C, Wolfram R, Hruby S, Bursa B, Schulman CC, Marberger M. Combination and multivariate analysis of PSA-based parameters for prostate cancer prediction. Tech Urol 1999; 5:71-6. [PMID: 10458658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based parameters including PSA density (PSAD), PSAD of the transition zone (PSA-TZ), percent free PSA, PSA velocity, and their combination to enhance the specificity of PSA for prostate cancer detection in men with serum PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. We evaluated prospectively 559 consecutive men referred for early detection of prostate cancer who had serum PSA levels between 4 and 10 ng/mL. All men underwent prostatic ultrasonography and sextant biopsy with two additional TZ biopsies. In all cases, if first biopsies were negative an additional set of biopsies was obtained within 6 weeks. The ability of PSAD, PSA-TZ, PSA velocity, percent free PSA, and their combination to improve the detection of prostate cancer was evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis as well as receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. In this prospective study of 559 patients, 217 had prostate cancer and 342 had histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia. Multivariate analysis and ROC curves showed that PSA-TZ and percent free PSA (f/t PSA) were the most powerful and highly significant predictors of prostate cancer. Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) for PSA-TZ and percent free PSA were 0.827 and 0.778, respectively (p = .01). Combination of f/t PSA with PSA-TZ (AUC = 88.1%) significantly increased AUC as compared to each of the other parameters alone as well as their combination (p = .02). The next best combinations were PSA-TZ + PSAD, PSA-TZ + PSA, and f/t PSA + PSA. PSA-TZ followed by f/t PSA and PSAD were the most powerful predictors of prostate cancer in referred patients with a serum PSA between 4 and 10 ng/mL. f/t PSA + PSA-TZ was the most effective combination. When volume-independent PSA parameters were taken into consideration, f/t PSA + PSA clearly outperformed the other options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Djavan B, Shariat S, Ghawidel K, Güven-Marberger K, Remzi M, Kovarik J, Hoerl WH, Marberger M. Impact of chronic dialysis on serum PSA, free PSA, and free/total PSA ratio: is prostate cancer detection compromised in patients receiving long-term dialysis? Urology 1999; 53:1169-74. [PMID: 10367847 DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(99)00010-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The increased incidence of malignancy (ie, prostate cancer) in patients with end-stage renal failure is well known. However, little is known of the impact of hemodialysis and various membrane types on total and free prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We prospectively studied the impact of high- and low-flux dialysis membranes and kidney function on total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA), and free/total PSA ratio (f/t PSA). METHODS A total of 149 men were included. tPSA, fPSA, and f/t PSA were measured before and immediately after dialysis with high-flux (n = 101) and low-flux (n = 48) membranes in the serum and in the dialysis ultrafiltrate. A multivariate analysis of the impact of kidney function and age on the rate of change of all parameters was performed. RESULTS Overall, a significant decrease of fPSA (from 0.49 +/- 0.3 to 0.35 +/- 0.3 ng/mL, P <0.0001) and f/t PSA (from 45 +/- 19% to 38 +/- 13%, P <0.0001) and a nonsignificant decrease in serum tPSA were observed. However, fPSA (from 0.51 +/- 0.5 to 0.27 +/- 0.3 ng/mL, P <0.0001) and f/t PSA (from 47 +/- 19% to 31 +/- 18%, P <0.0001) decreased significantly in high-flux membranes only. The ultrafiltrate contained 100% fPSA in high-flux membranes and no fPSA in low-flux membranes. Age, serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and dialysis evaluation parameters (Kt/V) had no impact on correlation with changes in tPSA and fPSA. CONCLUSIONS tPSA molecules do not pass high- and low-flux membranes; fPSA passes high-flux membranes only. The nonsignificant decrease of tPSA is due to adsorption to both dialysis membranes. Although tPSA can safely be used to screen patients on dialysis, independently from the dialysis procedure and membrane, fPSA and f/t PSA are only reliable with low-flux membranes. Finally, we can state that the fPSA is most probably cleared through the kidneys by glomerular filtration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Djavan
- Department of Urology, University of Vienna, Austria
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|