Effects of ovarian endometrioma on the number of oocytes retrieved for in vitro fertilization

Indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients with ovarian endometriosis undergoing IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the impact of ovarian endometriomas (OMA) on indirect markers of oocyte quality in patients undergoing IVF, compared with women without anatomical or functional ovarian abnormalities. The search spanned original randomized controlled trials, case-control studies and cohort studies published in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register and the ClinicalTrials.gov database up to October 2023. Thirty-one studies were included in the meta-analysis, showing no significant differences in fertilization (OR 1.10, 95% CI 0.94-1.30), blastulation (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.14) and cancellation (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.78-1.44) rates. However, patients with OMA exhibited significantly lower numbers of total and mature (metaphase II) oocytes retrieved (mean difference -1.59, 95% CI -2.25 to -0.94; mean difference -1.86, 95% CI -2.46 to -1.26, respectively), and lower numbers of top-quality embryos (mean difference -0.49, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.06). The Ovarian Sensitivity Index was similar between the groups (mean difference -1.55, 95% CI -3.27 to 0.18). The lack of data published to date prevented meta-analysis on euploidy rate. In conclusion, although the presence of OMA could decrease the oocyte yield in patients undergoing IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection, it does not appear to have an adverse impact on oocyte quality.

Ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI improves progressive pregnancy and live birth rate

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the impact of ethanol sclerotherapy of endometriomas prior to IVF/ICSI on pregnancy rates?

DESIGN

We reviewed women with endometrioma(s) larger than 25 mm having IVF/ICSI cycles. All patients with a history of ovarian cystectomy were excluded. Two groups were compared: patients who had transvaginal ethanol sclerotherapy of their endometrioma(s) before ovarian stimulation and patients whose endometrioma(s) were left in situ (untreated) at the time of IVF/ICSI (control group). Analyses were adjusted for confounding factors by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The primary endpoint was progressive pregnancy rates per IVF/ICSI cycle including fresh and frozen embryo transfers. Secondary endpoints were live birth rates, the number of mature oocytes retrieved, pregnancy loss. Endometriomas recurrence rates after sclerotherapy and procedural complications were also analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 96 cycles (67 patients) were included: 46 cycles (34 patients) in the ethanol sclerotherapy group and 50 cycles (33 patients) in the control group. After propensity score weighting, the pregnancy and live-birth rates were significantly higher in the ethanol sclerotherapy group compared to the control group (weighted OR, 2.9 ; 95 CI, 1.4 - 6.6 and weighted OR 2.4 ; 95 CI, 1.1 - 5.4 respectively), with a lower rate of pregnancy loss (weighted OR 0.3 ; 95 CI, 0.1 - 0.9). Ovarian response was similar in the two groups. The recurrence rate of endometrioma at 6 months after sclerotherapy was 20 %.

CONCLUSION

Sclerotherapy of endometrioma before ovarian stimulation may increase pregnancy rate, with a low rate of recurrence and a minimal risk of complication.

Evaluation of endometrioma size effect on ovarian reserve, embryo quality and pregnancy outcome after in vitro fertilization cycle; a cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Investigation of endometrioma size and its laterality on the quality of the embryo in patients with endometrioma compared to healthy subjects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective and cross-sectional study, 70 patients with unilateral and bilateral endometrioma were recruited and compared with 70 age-matched infertile patients as the control group in terms of AMH before ovum pick-up, embryo quality as well as pregnancy outcome. Additionally, in the case group, we divided both unilateral (n = 32) and bilateral endometrioma patients (n = 38) into three groups based on the size of endometrioma. (1-3 cm, 3-6 cm, 6-10 cm) RESULTS: There was no difference in terms of age, BMI, parity, and age of menarche between the case and control groups. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in the baseline level of AMH between the case 2.96 ± 2.72 ng/dl (0.21-11.3) and control 2.73 ± 2.39 (0.21-12.8) groups. (P = 0.59) There was also no significant difference concerning AMH level between unilateral 3.58 ± 3.20 ng/dl (0.21-12.8) and bilateral endometrioma 2.45 ± 2.14 (0.21 - 0.20) groups. In terms of the quality and number of embryos, there was no significant difference between the case and control groups. (P = 0.30) Although the AMH level decreased with the increase in endometrioma size, this difference was not statistically significant. (P = 0.07) There was no significant difference in terms of the embryo quality between the groups based on the size of endometrioma. (P = 0.77) In addition, no significant difference was observed between the case and control groups in the terms of birth weight and pregnancy complications, such as premature delivery, cesarean section rate, neonatal respiratory distress, jaundice, as well as hospitalization rate. Head circumference of the newborns was higher in the endometrioma group while their Apgar score was lower in the case compared to the control group.

CONCLUSION

The presence of endometrioma by itself does not affect the main result of IVF procedures, including the number and quality of embryos and pregnancy outcome. Thus, IVF and embryo preservation and even pregnancy before surgery seem to be reasonable for endometriotic patients.

Endometriosis-associated infertility: From pathophysiology to tailored treatment

Despite the clinically recognized association between endometriosis and infertility, the mechanisms implicated in endometriosis-associated infertility are not fully understood. Endometriosis is a multifactorial and systemic disease that has pleiotropic direct and indirect effects on reproduction. A complex interaction between endometriosis subtype, pain, inflammation, altered pelvic anatomy, adhesions, disrupted ovarian reserve/function, and compromised endometrial receptivity as well as systemic effects of the disease define endometriosis-associated infertility. The population of infertile women with endometriosis is heterogeneous, and diverse patients' phenotypes can be observed in the clinical setting, thus making difficult to establish a precise diagnosis and a single mechanism of endometriosis related infertility. Moreover, clinical management of infertility associated with endometriosis can be challenging due to this heterogeneity. Innovative non-invasive diagnostic tools are on the horizon that may allow us to target the specific dysfunctional alteration in the reproduction process. Currently the treatment should be individualized according to the clinical situation and to the suspected level of impairment. Here we review the etiology of endometriosis related infertility as well as current treatment options, including the roles of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies.

The impact of endometriosis on the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques: role of fertility preservation

Endometriosis is one of the most common diseases associated with infertility. It requires different therapeutic approaches, depending on the type, whether superficial, ovarian or deep endometriotic nodules, clinical presentation, age or origin of infertility. Patients with endometriosis should be considered a group of high-risk for infertility and any intervention should be planned taking this consideration into account. For many years, surgery was the only tool in improving fertility outcomes. Nowadays, it remains the gold standard for the treatment of endometriosis, but it should be carefully used because of its harmful potential, leading to premature ovarian insufficiency and further infertility. With the development of modern assisted reproductive techniques (ART), which can offer better results in terms of fertility, the role of surgery progressively decreased. Nowadays, therapeutic approach is complex and multidisciplinary teams should be guiding individual treatment for each woman. Options include medical treatment, surgery, in vitro fertilization (IVF) or oocytes/embryo/ovarian tissue cryopreservation. There is a constant effort in developing diagnostic scores, in order to predict risk of infertility and create standard of practice, offering a long-term approach in terms of fertility preservation and quality of life.

Appropriate surgical management of ovarian endometrioma: excision or drainage?

Endometriosis negatively impacts the lives of countless women around the world. When medical management fails to improve quality of life often women are left making a decision whether or not to proceed with surgery. With endometriomas, patient's surgical options include complete surgical removal or drainage via laparoscopy. Here, we review the literature to discuss both techniques, excision and drainage of endometriomas, and what the research supports for endometrioma management.

Approaching ovarian endometrioma with medical therapy

Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory gynecological disorder associated with pelvic pain symptoms and infertility. Ovarian cysts (endometriomas) are the most common localization of endometriosis in the pelvis. Considering non-invasive methods, transvaginal ultrasound has high sensitivity and specificity for endometrioma diagnosis. Laparoscopic removal of endometrioma is related to a damage to the ovarian reserve and should be limited to patients with suspicious cysts or unresponsive to medical treatment. The main goal of medical therapy of symptomatic endometrioma is the control of pain symptoms, while no benefits have been demonstrated in terms of improving fertility rates of women seeking pregnancy. The aim of medical treatment is the inhibition of ovulation, stop of menstruation and achievement of a stable hypo-hormonal milieu. Estroprogestins and progestins are indicated by guidelines as first line medications for symptomatic patients. Several hormonal treatments have been proposed for the treatment of symptomatic endometriomas. In particular, dienogest, a relatively new progestin, has shown promising results. Medical treatment should be conceived as a long-term treatment. Safety, tolerability, a low percentage of side effects and an easy route of administration are essential for patient acceptance and adherence to therapy.

The impact of endometrioma on in vitro fertilisation/intra-cytoplasmic injection IVF/ICSI reproductive outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) such as in vitro fertilisation (IVF) and intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) are often used to aid fertility in women with endometrioma; however, the implications of endometrioma on ART are unresolved.

Objective

To determine the effect of endometrioma on reproductive outcomes in women undergoing IVF or ICSI.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to identify articles examining women who had endometrioma and had undergone IVF or ICSI. Electronic searches were performed in PubMed, BIOSIS and MEDLINE up to September 2019. The primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), number of oocytes retrieved, number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved, number of embryos and top-quality embryos and the duration of gonadotrophin stimulation and dose.

Results

Eight studies were included. Where significant heterogeneity between studies was identified, a random-effects model was used. The number of oocytes (weighted means difference; WMD-2.25; 95% CI 3.43 to − 1.06, p = 0.0002) and the number of MII oocytes retrieved (WMD-4.64; 95% CI 5.65 to − 3.63, p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in women with endometrioma versus controls. All other outcomes, including gonadotrophin dose and duration, the total number of embryos, high-quality embryos, CPR, IR and LBR were similar in women with and without endometrioma.

Conclusion

Even though women with endometriomas had a reduced number of oocytes and MII oocytes retrieved when compared to women without, no other differences in reproductive outcomes were identified. This implies that IVF/ICSI is a beneficial ART approach for women with endometrioma.

Antral follicle count is reduced in the presence of endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Studies suggest that the presence of endometriosis may lead to impaired ovarian reserve, while results evaluating the changes in antral follicle count (AFC) in endometriosis remain controversial. A systematic search returned 15 studies, of which nine compared AFC between patients with and without endometriosis, five articles reported differences in AFC between affected and unaffected ovaries in patients with unilateral ovarian endometriosis and one reported both of the above two situations. Overall results showed a significant decrease in AFC and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and increase in serum FSH concentrations in patients with endometriosis when compared with controls. Additionally, the AFC for the ovary with the endometrioma was also significantly lower than that of the contralateral ovary in patients with unilateral ovarian endometriosis. Moreover, it appears that the AFC in patients with endometriosis where the ovaries are not affected or in early stage were not significantly different in the control group. These findings demonstrate that endometriosis is associated with reduced AFC and AMH and elevated serum concentrations of FSH, suggesting a reduction in ovarian reserve in patients with endometriosis, especially in those with ovarian endometrioma and advanced stage.

Impact of endometrioma and bilaterality on IVF / ICSI cycles in patients with endometriosis

AIM

Endometriosis, one of the most common gynecological disorder, is a challenging disease observed in 20 %-40 % of subfertile women. Endometriomas affect 17-44 % of women with endometriosis. Because endometrioma has detrimental effects on fertility, many of these women need Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) to conceive. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of endometrioma presence and impact of bilaterality over In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) and Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection (ICSI) outcomes.

METHOD

The study was designed retrospectively. A total of 159 women enrolled in IVF / ICSI cycles were included. Patients were divided into two groups as Endometrioma group (n: 73) and control group (n:86). In Endometrioma group, subgroup analysis was performed according to whether endometrioma was unilateral or bilateral. Demographic characters, clinical and laboratory parameters were recorded. SPSS was used for analysis.

RESULTS

In endometrioma group, although basal FSH levels was higher than control group, it was within normal limits, while estradiol levels was lower (p < 0.001, p 0.042, respectively). Antral follicle count (AFC), dominant follicle number, total oocyte count, MII oocyte numbers were found to be significantly lower, whereas numbers of embryos achieved, clinical pregnancy rates (PR) and live birth rates (LBR) were found to be similar.There were no statistically significant differences in terms of Antimullerian Hormon (AMH) levels, oocyte and embryo quality, the numbers of embryos achieved, PR and LBR between unilateral and bilateral endometrioma groups.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that presence of endometrioma negatively effects fertility parameters albeit no significant effect over embryo quality, PR and LBR whereas bilaterality doesn't have any influence over any fertility parameters and PR.

The impact of endometrioma size on ovarian responsiveness

RESEARCH QUESTION

Available evidence shows that the presence of ovarian endometriomas does not interfere with the ovarian response to ovarian stimulation. However, the mean size of the endometriomas in these studies is generally small, and two recent investigations suggested that follicular development could be impaired when focusing on larger endometriomas. However, these studies could not identify a clear threshold above which endometriomas could become detrimental.

DESIGN

To identify this threshold, the study retrospectively selected women without a history of surgery for ovarian cysts who underwent IVF in the presence of unilateral endometriomas with a mean diameter between 20 and 49 mm. Selected women were divided into three categories of endometrioma size: 20-29 mm (group 1, n = 23), 30-39 mm (group 2, n = 2323), and 40-49 mm (group 3, n = 2321). Recruitment for each category was censored at about 21 women to ensure equal statistical power for each group.

RESULTS

The response to ovarian stimulation was equal or superior in the affected gonads in eight women (35%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 16-57%), seven women (30%, 95% CI 13-53%) and two women (10%, 95% CI 2-30%) in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The median (interquartile range) number of developed follicles in the affected and intact ovaries was 6 (3-7) and 5 (4-9) in group 1 (P = 0.21), 4 (1-6) and 4 (3-7) in group 2 (P = 0.08), 5 (3-7), and 7 (4-8) in group 3 (P = 0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The threshold to be used to distinguish between endometriomas that might and might not interfere with ovarian response is 4 cm in diameter.

Management of endometriosis-related infertility: Considerations and treatment options

Endometriosis is a common inflammatory disease in women of reproductive age and is one of the major causes of infertility. Endometriosis causes a sustained reduction of ovarian reserve through both physical mechanisms and inflammatory reactions, which result in the production of reactive oxygen species and tissue fibrosis. The severity of endometriosis is related to ovarian reserve. With regard to infertility treatment, medical therapy as a neoadjuvant or adjuvant to surgical therapy has no definite beneficial effect. Surgical treatment of endometriosis can lead to ovarian injury during the resection of endometriotic tissue, which leads to the deterioration of ovarian reserve. To overcome this disadvantage, a multistep technique has been proposed to minimize the reduction of ovarian reserve. When considering surgical treatment of endometriosis in patients experiencing infertility, it should be kept in mind that ovarian reserve can be reduced both due to endometriosis itself and by the process of removing endometriosis. In cases of mild- to moderate-stage endometriosis, intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation after surgical treatment may increase the likelihood of pregnancy. In cases of severe endometriosis, the characteristics of the patient should be considered in a multidisciplinary manner to determine the prioritization of treatment modalities, including surgical treatment and assisted reproduction methods such as in vitro fertilization. The risk of cancer, complications after pregnancy, and infection during oocyte retrieval should also be considered when making treatment decisions.

Surgery for endometriomas within the context of infertility treatment

BACKGROUND

The presence of an endometrioma can often be accompanied by a clinical dilemma during the course of fertility treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels and spontaneous pregnancy rate in infertility patients with endometriomas depending of initial AMH levels and cyst type.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included infertility patients with unilateral endometrioma (3-5 s m in diameter) aged 25-35. A total of them underwent laparoscopic cystectomy. All patients were divided into two groups due to AMH levels and cyst type during surgery. We investigated AMH levels and spontaneous pregnancy rate in 1,3 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The majority of patients with normal AMH level had type II endometriomas (70%) compared with low AMH level group (30%). There were no significant differences between AMH levels in all the patients with type II endometriomas after surgery. AMH level decreased significantly at 1 month in patients with normal AMH level and type I endometriomas (P = 0.018). But at 3 months the AMH level was compared with initial parameters. Women with low AMH levels before surgery and type I cysts had a significant decrease of AMH level at 1 and at 3 months after surgery. All patients with a time interval of 6 months after surgery had the best outcomes with significantly higher pregnancy rate (PR) in patients with normal AMH level and type II cysts (P = 0.036) and with AMH less than 2 ng/ml and type I cysts (P = 0.021). The group with normal AMH level and type II endometriomas had a significantly higher ongoing cumulative PR than others (59.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that laparoscopic surgery could affect ovarian reserve in case of initial low AMH levels and type I of endometriomas. We believe that the good surgical technique helps to increase pregnancy rate in infertility patients with endometriomas. Good prognosis group are the infertility patients with normal AMH level and type II endometriomas.

Risk of miscarriage in women with endometriosis undergoing IVF fresh cycles: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Endometriosis is thought to affect the effectiveness of ART by an increased risk of miscarriage. We aimed to investigate the impact of endometriosis in women achieving singleton pregnancies through IVF fresh cycles and risk of miscarriage.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all women undergoing a first IVF cycle and achieving singleton pregnancies after fresh embryo transfer in a tertiary university hospital reproductive medical center between January 2008 and June 2016. Women with endometriosis were compared with women with no endometriosis. Women in the endometriosis group were all with a history of laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometriosis and/or with ovarian endometrioma. The control group was matched 1:2 according to age and study period.

RESULTS

Among the cohort, we identified 1006 women with endometriosis as study group and 2012 unaffected women matched in a 1:2 ratios as control group. The miscarriage rate between women with and without endometriosis was similar (22.4 and 20.1%, P = 0.085). The odds ratio after adjusting for the risk factors for miscarriage was 1.14 (95% confidence interval 0.95-1.37). In the study group, the women with and without endometrioma did not show a significant risk of miscarriage, (19.8 and 23.8%, P = 0.152, OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.58-1.09). The miscarriage rate in women with endometrioma ≥30 mm (37.3 ± 7.1 mm) and < 30 mm (19.3 ± 5.5 mm) was not significantly different, (24.7 and 18.5%, P = 0.229, OR 1.44, 95% CI 0.79-2.63). After adjustment for risk factors for miscarriage, the presence of endometrioma and the size of endometrioma, regression model confirmed no significant increase for the risk of miscarriage in the subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of miscarriage did not statistically increase in women with endometriosis who achieved pregnancy through IVF fresh cycles.

The impact of the localisation of endometriosis lesions on ovarian reserve and assisted reproduction techniques outcomes

This case-control study was designed to evaluate the impact of endometriosis and the presence of endometrioma (OMA) per se on the serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level and also to compare the in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) outcomes after therapeutic surgery in endometriosis patients, according to the localisation of endometriosis lesions. One hundred and fifty two infertile women ≤40 years with suspicious symptoms were surgically evaluated to detect the aetiology of infertility at the Royan Institute during this study and, in parallel, 131 patients with a male factor infertility diagnosis were considered as the control group. The serum AMH level and IVF/ICSI outcomes were compared according to the nature and extension degree of endometriosis lesions. The results demonstrated that the existence of a deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with and without OMA was associated with a significant decrease in AMH level, antral follicle count and ovarian sensitivity index (OSI) (p < .001 and p = .007, respectively). The multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for confounding factors indicated that the OSI and the existence of DIE with and without OMA were a significant predictive variable for clinical pregnancy and for live birth. On the basis of our results, the severity of endometriosis and the location of its lesions could affect an ovarian reserve and the ovarian stimulation outcomes. Impact Statement What is already known on this subject? Previous studies have evaluated the impact of endometrioma (OMA) on ovarian reserve and the assisted reproduction technology (ART) outcomes and controversial results have been reported; therefore, it seems that this topic still needs further research. What the results of this study add? In the present study, the effect of endometriosis lesions' localisation on ovarian reserve and the success rate of the in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycle after therapeutic surgery were compared with that of the control group. It was found that the existence of a deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) with and without OMA was associated with a significant decrease in the anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) level, antral follicle count, ovarian sensitivity index (OSI), clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The results of this study has a practical value in the decision making process for the ovarian stimulation protocol in patients with the different severity of endometriosis and the counselling regarding the success rate of IVF or ICSI/embryo transfer cycles.

Detrimental effects of endometriosis on oocyte morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: a retrospective cohort study

While an association can be addressed among endometriosis and subfertility, the causal relationship has not been elucidated yet. Impaired oocyte quality in endometriosis patients has been accused for the unsuccessful outcomes of assisted reproductive techniques. There are limited studies in literature evaluated association between endometriosis and oocyte morphology. We conducted this retrospective study to evaluate whether morphological abnormalities of oocytes are more common in women with endometriosis than women with diagnosis of male factor infertility as a source of healthy oocytes. Totally 1568 oocytes, 775 (49.4%) in endometriosis groups and 793 (50.6%) in control group were evaluated for morphological parameters before ICSI cycles. Abnormal oocyte morphology was detected in 352 (22.4%) of 1568 oocytes. Of the abnormal oocytes, 208 (59.1%) were in endometriosis group and 144 (40.9%) in control group (p < .001). The following dysmorphisms were significantly higher in oocytes retrieved from endometriosis group: dark cytoplasm; dark, large or thin zona pellucida; and flat or fragmented polar body (p <  .05 for all). When morphological parameters for oocytes of endometriosis patients evaluated, the oocyte defects has increased significantly in endometriosis patients. These findings are thought to be useful to clarify the subfertility in endometriosis patient, which needs to be confirmed with further studies.

The effect of surgical management of endometrioma on the IVF/ICSI outcomes when compared with no treatment? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To assess the impact of surgical management of endometrioma on the outcome of assisted reproduction treatment (ART).

Design

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting

Department of reproductive medicine at teaching university hospital, UK.

Patients

Subfertile women with endometrioma undergoing ART.

Interventions

Surgical removal of endometrioma or expectant management.

Main outcome measures

Clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy rate, live birth rate, number of oocytes retrieved and number of embryos available and ovarian response to gonadotrophins.

Results

An extensive search of electronic databases for articles published from inception to September 2016 yielded 11 eligible studies for meta-analysis. Meta-analysis was conducted comparing surgery versus no treatment of endometrioma. There were no significant differences in pregnancy rate per cycle, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate between women who underwent surgery for endometrioma and those who did not.

Conclusion

Current evidence suggests that women with endometriosis-related infertility have similar cycle outcomes to other patients going through ART. It is pertinent for clinicians to assess the risks of surgical intervention on ovarian reserve prior to initiating therapy.

[IVF and endometriosis, oocyte donation and fertility preservation]

Endometriosis is a common condition, causing pain and infertility. In infertile woman with superficial peritoneal endometriosis and patent tubes, laparoscopy is recommended, followed by ovarian stimulation alone or in combination with intrauterine inseminations. In case of ovarian or deep endometriosis, the indications of surgery and assisted reproductive technologies remain to be defined precisely. In vitro fertilization is generally proposed after the failure of up to three inseminations, directly for ovarian or deep endometriosis, or in case of an associated factor of infertility, mainly male. Before ovarian stimulation in view to in vitro fertilization, a pretreatment by GnRH agonist for 2 to 6 months or combined contraceptive for 6 to 8 weeks would improve the pregnancy rate. Egg donation is effective in patients with advanced ovarian failure or lack of ovarian response to stimulation. Fertility preservation, especially by oocytes vitrified, must be proposed preventively to women with endometriosis at risk of ovarian failure, without close wish to be pregnant.

Practice Bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and Management of Adnexal Masses

Adnexal masses (ie, masses of the ovary, fallopian tube, or surrounding tissues) commonly are encountered by obstetrician-gynecologists and often present diagnostic and management dilemmas. Most adnexal masses are detected incidentally on physical examination or at the time of pelvic imaging. Less commonly, a mass may present with symptoms of acute or intermittent pain. Management decisions often are influenced by the age and family history of the patient. Although most adnexal masses are benign, the main goal of the diagnostic evaluation is to exclude malignancy. The purpose of this document is to provide guidelines for the evaluation and management of adnexal masses in adolescents, pregnant women, and nonpregnant women and to outline criteria for the identification of adnexal masses that are likely to be malignant and may warrant referral to or consultation with a gynecologic oncologist.

Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive procedures with embryos that had been derived from affected and unaffected ovaries among women with small unilateral endometriomas

Aim

To clarify the effects of small endometriomas on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes. In the present study, the potential impact of small ovarian endometriomas on the quantitative and qualitative outcomes of IVF was evaluated in the same individual.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed, in which 118 infertile women with unilateral endometriomas that were <40 mm in size and who underwent IVF or intracytoplasmic sperm injection were evaluated. Single frozen embryo transfer cycles were performed, with separate data collections for both the affected and the unaffected ovaries, which allowed for an evaluation of the implantation rate.

Results

The mean antral follicular count and the number of follicular flushings, retrieved oocytes, and obtained embryos were significantly lower for the endometrioma‐containing ovary than for the contralateral, intact ovary. No significant difference was observed regarding the blastocyst retrieval and good‐quality blastocyst retrieval rates, pregnancy rate, and clinical pregnancy or live birth rate.

Conclusion

Although the patients with a small endometrioma had a decreased ovarian reserve, they had lower pregnancy rates. The decision to transfer an embryo from an endometrioma‐containing ovary or from a contralateral, intact ovary also might not influence the pregnancy rate.

[Conservative management of endometrioma in women undergoing in vitro fertilization]

Endometriosis is a chronic disease. The pathogenesis is actually still unclear. Endometriosis is responsible for infertility and/or pelvic pain. One of the most important features of the disease is the heterogeneity (clinical and anatomical). Among the different phenotypes of endometriosis, the ovarian endometrioma seems to most important lesion in the management of endometriosis-related infertility. Surgical treatment is associated to a decrease of the ovarian reserve and a potential detrimental effect on in vitro fecondation (IVF) outcomes. Thus, the choice between conservative or surgical management of endometrioma before IVF is actually debated. The advantages and drawback of surgical and conservative management should be discussed before to plan the treatment. In the present review, we aimed at assessing the risks of a conservative management of endometrioma as compared to surgery before IVF.

Effect of ovarian endometrioma on uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertile women

Background

Angiogenesis has been found to be among the most important factors in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. The formation of new blood vessels is critical for the survival of newly implanted endometriotic foci. The use of 3-D power Doppler allows for the demonstration of the dynamic vascular changes that occur during the process of in vitro fertilization (IVF). We aimed to evaluate the effect of ovarian endometrioma on uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertile women.

Materials and methods

In a case–control study at a university teaching hospital, 138 women with unilateral ovarian endometrioma scheduled for IVF were compared to 138 women with male-factor or unexplained infertility. In the mid-luteal (peri-implantation) phase of the cycle, endometrial thickness, uterine and ovarian artery pulsatility index and resistance index, endometrial and ovarian volume, 3-D power Doppler vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization FI (VFI) values were measured in both groups.

Results

There were no significant differences (P>0.05) in endometrial thickness, uterine ovarian artery pulsatility index and resistance index, endometrial and ovarian volume, or VI, FI, and VFI between the two groups. Furthermore, the endometrial and ovarian Doppler indices were not influenced by endometrioma size. No significant differences were observed in the ovarian Doppler indices between endometrioma-containing ovaries and contralateral ovaries.

Conclusion

Ovarian endometrioma is not associated with impaired endometrial and ovarian blood flows in infertile women scheduled for IVF, and it is not likely to affect endometrial receptivity or ovarian function through a vascular mechanism.

Effects of Supplementation of Human Endometriotic Fluids on In Vitro Mouse Preantral Follicle Culture

This study aimed to investigate the potential detrimental effect of human endometriotic fluids (EFs) on in vitro growth of mouse preantral follicles. Preantral follicles (isolated from ovaries of 7- to 8-week-old mice) were cultured in growth medium for 10 days and then in maturation medium for 2 days. During in vitro culture, EF supernatants (0%, 2.5%, 5%, and 10%) were supplemented. Meiotic spindle integrity of metaphase II (MII) oocytes was analyzed. Hormone (17β-estradiol and anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH]) levels in the final spent media were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The survival rates of follicles at day 10 were significantly lower in 3 EF-supplemented groups (56.1%, 30.6%, and 6.2%; 83.6% in the nonsupplemented group). The production of total oocytes per initiated follicle was also significantly lower in the 3 EF-supplemented groups (34.7%, 18.4%, and 4.1%; 68.1% in the nonsupplemented group). Proportions of the oocyte with normal spindles were significantly lower in the 3 EF-supplemented groups (10%, 0% and 0%; 52% in the nonsupplemented group). In the final spent media, the level of 17β-estradiol was significantly lower only in the 10% EF-supplemented group, and the level of AMH was significantly lower in all 3 EF-supplemented groups, when compared with the nonsupplemented group. During in vitro culture of mouse preantral follicles, the survival rate, oocyte acquisition, spindle integrity of MII oocytes, and AMH production were greatly affected by EF supplementation. These findings suggest a possibility of detrimental effects of endometriotic cysts on folliculogenesis in adjacent ovarian tissues.

Controversies in the Management of Endometrioma: To Cure Sometimes, to Treat Often, to Comfort Always?

Endometriomas are common in reproductive-aged women, but controversy exists regarding their management. PubMed was searched to identify pertinent studies on outcomes of medical and surgical management of endometrioma, with focus on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses. Surgical excision is more effective than fenestration/coagulation of endometrioma for pelvic pain but decreases antimullerian hormone. It may modestly improve the chances of spontaneous pregnancy, but does not impact chances of success with in vitro fertilization. Oral contraceptive pills improve dysmenorrhea but not dyspareunia or noncyclic pelvic pain. Management of the patient with endometrioma should be individualized based on each patient's particular symptoms and short-term and long-term fertility goals.

Modern Management of Endometrioma-Associated Infertility: in Favor of ART

Introduction

Endometrioma is present in 17% to 40% of women with endometriosis. Since it has been traditionally believed that the presence of an endometrioma adversely affects the outcome of assisted reproductive technology (ART), surgery has been suggested by many practitioners before advancing to ART, in the hope of improving results.

Scientific Evidence

In the present article, we outline the impact of an endometrioma on the ovarian reserve and describe how surgical resection of an endometriotic cyst affects ovarian reserve, ovarian response after stimulation and ART outcome. Several studies suggest that the sole presence of an endometrioma may have a negative impact on ovarian reserve of the affected ovary, and surgery (particularly cystectomy) has been the choice of treatment in ovarian endometriosis for many years. However, detrimental effects of laparoscopic surgical removal on ovarian reserve and responsiveness to hyperstimulation has made that ART practices are shifting towards a more conservative approach: experimental and clinical data supporting this shift are thoroughly reviewed here.

Clinical Implications

Opposed to the conventional criteria of performing cystectomy when ovarian endometrioma is observed, careful consideration of patient symptoms as well as her age and ovarian reserve will help to select the patients that require surgery prior to ART, whereas the majority will not need surgery prior to ART; even more, surgery may compromise ovarian reserve in most cases even if performed by careful surgeons.

Conclusions

Individualization of the treatment is imperative. Each case should be thoroughly assessed, looking at both the advantages and complications of cyst removal prior to ART. Surgery should be approached with caution in women with endometriomas, especially if the woman has had previous ovarian surgery. In the presence of infertility, we recommend generally sparing surgical treatment and proceeding directly to ART. This reduces the time to achieve a pregnancy, avoids potential surgical risks and limits patient costs.

The Presence of Endometrioma Does Not Impair Time-Lapse Morphokinetic Parameters and Quality of Embryos: A Study On Sibling Oocytes

OBJECTIVE

To see whether the oocytes retrieved from an ovary with an endometrioma would develop into embryos with aberrant timings of cleavage as assessed using time-lapse monitoring (TLM) and poorer morphologic quality compared with sibling oocytes from the contralateral ovary with no endometrioma in the same patient after intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

METHODS

This was an observational prospective study at an in vitro fertilization (IVF) center of a private hospital. It included analysis and comparison of 128 embryos (69 embryos developed from the ovary with endometrioma and 59 embryos from the contralateral ovary without endometrioma serving as controls from a total of 20 women with infertility). Morphology of the embryo was assessed twice (days 3 and 5), again by capturing images with the TLM system. Morphokinetic parameters of embryos and clinical pregnancy rates were recorded separately from ovaries with and without endometrioma and were the primary outcomes of the study. Secondary outcomes included number of retrieved oocytes, number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes, fertilization rates, and conventional morphological classification of embryos.

RESULTS

There were no differences in terms of the following time-lapse morphokinetic parameters of embryos. The mean numbers of oocytes and MII oocytes collected from the ovary with the endometrioma were similar to those collected from the contralateral ovary without endometrioma. Fertilization rates and the percentage of embryos with top morphologic quality were also similar.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the morphokinetic parameters, this study further strengthens the notion that removal of endometriomas before IVF is not a necessity in terms of better oocyte quality and development.

Impact of endometriomas and their removal on ovarian reserve

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The effect of endometrioma on ovulatory function and ovarian reserve was unclear. Conflicting opinions exist regarding effect of endometrioma excision on ovarian reserve.

RECENT FINDINGS

Endometriomas do not seem to affect ovulatory function. Women with endometrioma have lower antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels than age-matched healthy controls. There is high-quality evidence suggesting a significant decline in serum anti-Müllerian hormone levels following endometrioma excision. However, a similarly significant decline in antral follicle count is not demonstrated. Cauterization seems to be a contributing factor to ovarian damage and suturing the cyst bed could perhaps be a better alternative.

SUMMARY

It seems prudent to warn patients regarding loss of ovarian reserve following endometrioma excision. Surgeons should cautiously limit the use of cauterization following stripping of endometrioma. Well designed studies comparing effect of various haemostatic measures on ovarian reserve are needed.

In vitro fertilization for endometriosis-associated infertility

Endometriosis is an enigmatic disease affecting 10-15% of reproductive aged women and is encountered in 25-35% of women suffering from infertility. IVF is an effective tool to overcome endometriosis-associated infertility when expectant management or surgery fails. Direct IVF should be envisioned if the female age is greater than 38 year and infertility is long lasting. Likewise, semen characteristics or tubal status that is incompatible with natural conception mandates going straight to IVF. IVF, not only bypasses the distortion of pelvic anatomy associated with advanced stage endometriosis, but also removes gametes from a hostile peritoneal environment. In this article, we address the impact, if any, of endometriosis and endometriomason IVF outcome, whether surgical treatment of early-stage disease, endometriomas or deep infiltrating endometriosis would enhance pregnancy rates in IVF, which protocol to employ for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF and finally the impact, if any, of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF on progression of endometriosis.

Endometriosis and ovarian reserve

Endometriosis is characterized by development of the endometrial tissue outside the uterus like ovary, pelvic peritoneum, pelvic organs, and affects 6-10% of reproductive-aged women. The prevalence of endometrioma is 17-44% of women with endometriosis. Since endometriosis is mainly a disease for the women at their reproductive ages, it is important to consider ovarian reserve when managing the cases with ovarian endometriosis. There has been a long debate whether the endometrioma per se decreases the ovarian reserve and/or surgery for endometrioma - either by laparoscopy or by laparotomy - decreases it. Although the dispute for these questions is not totally settled down, in this article, we would like to give some clues for the answers in view of the literature.

Pearls and pitfalls in surgery for endometrioma

Endometrioma surgery should be planned and executed very carefully as it is associated with risks that may hamper future reproductive potential. Symptoms, age, risk of malignancy, bilaterality, ovarian reserve, and desire to have children should all be taken into account prior to surgical intervention. Cyclic and noncyclic severe pain may be an indicator or deep infiltrating diseases. Laparoscopic surgery is the gold standard, however, the issue of resection versus ablation should be further studied.

Endometriosis-Related Infertility: The Role of the Assisted Reproductive Technologies

The assisted reproductive technologies, particularly in vitro fertilization (IVF), represent the most efficient and successful means of overcoming infertility associated with endometriosis. Although older studies suggest that IVF outcomes are compromised in endometriosis patients, more contemporary reports show no differences compared to controls. The exception may be evidence of poorer outcomes and diminished ovarian response in women with advanced disease, particularly those with significant ovarian involvement or prior ovarian surgery. Prolonged pre-IVF cycle suppressive medical therapy, particularly gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists, appears to improve success rates in a subset of endometriosis patients. However, as of yet, there is no diagnostic marker to specifically identify those who would most benefit from this approach. Pre-IVF cycle surgical resection of nonovarian disease has not been consistently shown to improve outcomes with the possible exception of resection of deeply invasive disease, although the data is limited. Precycle resection of ovarian endometriomas does not have benefit and should only be performed for gynecologic indications. Indeed, there is a large body of evidence to suggest that this procedure may have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve and response. A dearth of appropriately designed trials makes development of definitive treatment paradigms challenging.

An Update on Surgical versus Expectant Management of Ovarian Endometriomas in Infertile Women

Ovarian endometriomas are a common manifestation of endometriosis that can represent a more severe stage of the disease. There is much debate over the treatment of these cysts in infertile women, particularly before use of assisted reproductive technologies. Evidence exists that supports surgical excision of ovarian endometriomas, as well as evidence that cautions against surgical intervention. Certain factors need to be examined closely before proceeding with surgery or continuing with expectant management. These include the patient's symptoms, age, ovarian reserve, size and laterality of the cyst, prior surgical treatment, and level of suspicion for malignancy. The most recent evidence appears to suggest that certain patient profiles may benefit from proceeding directly to in vitro fertilization (IVF). These include symptomatic infertile patients, especially those that are older, those that have diminished ovarian reserve, those that have bilateral endometriomas, or those that have had prior surgical treatment. Although endometriomas can be detrimental to the ovarian reserve, surgical therapy may further lower a woman's ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, the presence of an endometrioma does not appear to adversely affect IVF outcomes, and surgical excision of endometriomas does not appear to improve IVF outcomes. Regardless of treatment plan, infertile patients with endometriomas must be counseled appropriately before choosing either treatment path.

Fertility preservation in women with endometriosis: for all, for some, for none?

The increasing confidence with the techniques of oocyte and ovarian cortex freezing has prompted their potential use for patient categories other than those at risk of early menopause due to cancer treatments. Women affected by every iatrogenic or pathologic condition known to compromise ovarian function severely have been considered as potential candidates for fertility preservation. Among them, women with endometriosis may represent a particularly suitable group since they are at increased risk of premature ovarian exhaustion and about half of them will experience infertility. Based on the currently available notions on the intricate relationships between endometriosis, infertility and damage to the ovarian reserve, we speculate that fertility preservation may be of interest for women with endometriosis, in particular for those with bilateral unoperated endometriomas and for those who previously had excision of unilateral endometriomas and require surgery for a contralateral recurrence. Young age at diagnosis may be an independent but pivotal additional factor to be taken into consideration in the balance of the pros and cons of fertility preservation. On the other hand, we argue against the introduction of fertility preservation for endometriosis in routine clinical practice. To date, only few cases have been reported and there are insufficient data for robust cost-utility analyses. It is noteworthy that endometriosis is a relatively common disease and systematically including affected women in a fertility preservation program would have profound clinical, logistic and financial effects. More clinical data and in-depth economic analysis are imperative prior to recommending its routine use.

Impact of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness and IVF: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the effect of ovarian endometrioma on ovarian responsiveness to stimulation and on assisted reproduction outcomes was evaluated. Nine published studies (1039 cases) were included. The number of oocytes retrieved (mean difference [MD] -1.50; 95% CI, -2.84 to -0.15, P = 0.03), metaphase II (MII) oocytes retrieved (MD -3.61; 95% CI -4.44 to -2.78, P < 0.00001) and total embryos formed (MD -0.66; 95% CI -1.13 to -0.18, P = 0.007) were significantly lower in women with ovarian endometrioma than the control group. Gonadotrophin dose, duration of stimulation, number of good-quality embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were similar. Comparisons between ovaries with endometriomas and healthy ovaries of the same individuals were also made. Number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes retrieved and total embryos formed were not statistically significantly different between the affected ovaries and contralateral normal ovaries. Observational studies showed that ovarian endometrioma was associated with fewer oocytes retrieved, fewer MII oocytes retrieved and fewer total formed embryos. Clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rates were not affected. Intra-patient comparisons in women with unilateral endometrioma suggested the number of oocytes retrieved, MII oocytes retrieved and total embryos formed were similar.

Exploring the Relationship between Endometriomas and Infertility

Several clinical and epidemiological studies demonstrated an association between endometriosis and infertility. A role in the genesis of infertility may be played by endometriomas, which may interfere with ovulation or damage ovarian tissue. Unlike peritoneal implants, the availability of an accurate noninvasive sonographic diagnosis facilitates the investigation of endometrioma associated infertility. The laparoscopic excision of an endometrioma relieves the ovary from the damage caused by the cyst itself, which may be progressive over time, but at the same time is associated with a detrimental effect on ovarian reserve and with high rates of postoperative endometrioma recurrence. Therefore, the management of endometrioma-related infertility should not be based upon surgery alone, but upon a combination of surgery, with a refinement of the operating technique, long-term oral contraceptive, in vitro fertilization and oocyte cryopreservation.

Ovarian reserve markers and assisted reproductive technique (ART) outcomes in women with advanced endometriosis

BACKGROUND

The role of ovarian reserve markers as predictors of the controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) response in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles in women with endometriosis has been much debated. The aim of the present study is to assess the predictability of ovarian reserve markers for the number of mature oocytes (MII) retrieved and to assess the pregnancy rate and live birth rate in women with advanced endometriosis.

METHODS

Two hundred eighty-five infertile women who had laparoscopy followed by a first ICSI cycle were recruited in this prospective study. One hundred ten patients were diagnosed with endometriosis stage III-IV (group 1), and 175 patients had no endometriosis (group II). Sixty-three patients in group 1 had no history of previous endometrioma surgery (group Ia), and 47 patients had a history of previous endometrioma surgery (group Ib).

RESULTS

The number of mature oocytes retrieved was significantly lower in women with advanced endometriosis than in women with no endometriosis. The number of mature oocytes retrieved in women with and without endometriosis was best predicted by antral follicle count (AFC) and age, whereas only AFC was a predictor in women with previous endometrioma surgery (odds ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.13-0.60). Women with endometriosis had a lower rate of live births than the control group, but this difference was not statistically significant; the number of live births was significantly lower in those with previous endometrioma surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The best predictor of the COS response in ICSI was AFC, followed by age. Women receiving ICSI following surgery for ovarian endometrioma had a poorer clinical outcome and lower rate of live births compared with those with endometriosis but no previous surgery and the control group.

Impact of endometriosis and its staging on assisted reproduction outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the presence or severity of endometriosis affects the outcome of assisted reproductive techniques (ART).

METHODS

In this systematic review, all studies comparing the outcome of ART in women with and those without endometriosis, or at different stages of the disease, were considered eligible. We used either risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) and their 95%CIs for comparisons. The primary outcome was live birth; the secondary outcome was clinical pregnancy. Miscarriage and the number of oocytes retrieved were examined as additional outcomes.

RESULTS

We included 92 studies in the review and 78 in the meta-analysis: 20,167 women with endometriosis were compared with 121,931 women without endometriosis, and 1703 women with Stage-III/IV endometriosis were compared with 2227 women with Stage-I/II endometriosis. The following results were observed for the comparison of women with endometriosis vs women without endometriosis: live birth, RR = 0.99 (95%CI, 0.92-1.06); clinical pregnancy, RR = 0.95 (95%CI, 0.89-1.02); miscarriage, RR = 1.31 (95%CI, 1.07-1.59); number of oocytes retrieved, MD = -1.56 (95%CI, -2.05 to -1.08). The following results were observed for the comparison of women with Stage-III/IV vs Stage-I/II endometriosis: live birth, RR = 0.94 (95%CI, 0.80-1.11); clinical pregnancy, RR = 0.90 (95%CI, 0.82-1.00); miscarriage, RR = 0.99 (95%CI, 0.73-1.36); number of oocytes retrieved, MD = -1.03 (95%CI, -1.67 to -0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with endometriosis undergoing ART have practically the same chance of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth as do women with other causes of infertility. No relevant difference was observed in the chance of achieving clinical pregnancy and live birth following ART when comparing Stage-III/IV with Stage-I/II endometriosis. The quality of the evidence for the additional examined outcomes was very low, not allowing meaningful conclusions to be drawn.