Pressure changes during embryo transfer

Simulation-based training for embryo transfer for clinicians with differing levels of expertise: an application of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Simulator

Objective

To compare the learning curve of clinicians with different levels of embryo transfer (ET) experience using the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) Embryo Transfer Simulator.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Single large university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center.

Patients

Participants with 3 levels of expertise with ET were recruited: "group 1" (Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility attendings), "group 2" (Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility nurses, advance practice providers, or medical assistants), and "group 3" (Obstetrics and Gynecology resident physicians).

Interventions

All participants completed ET simulation training using uterine cases A, B, and C (easiest to most difficult) of the ASRM ET Simulator. Participants completed each case 5 times for a total of 15 repetitions.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome was ET simulation scores analyzed at each attempt for each uterine case, with a maximum score of 155. Secondary outcomes included self-assessed comfort levels before and after the completion of the simulation and total duration of ET. Comfort was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

Twenty-seven participants with 3 different levels of expertise with ET were recruited from December 2020 to February 2021. For cases A and B, median total scores were not significantly different between groups 1 and 3 at first or last attempts. Group 2 did not perform as well as group 3 at the beginning of case A or group 1 at the end of case B. All groups demonstrated a decrease in total time from the first attempt to the last attempt for both cases. For case C, the "difficult" uterus, groups 2 and 3 exhibited the greatest improvement in total median score: from 0 to 75 from the first to last attempt. Group 1 scored equally well from first through last attempts. Although no one from group 2 or 3 achieved a passing score with the first attempt (80% of the max score), approximately 30% had passing scores at the last attempt. Groups 1 and 3 showed a significant decrease in total time across attempts for case C. Following simulation, 100% of groups 2 and 3 reported perceived improvement in their skills. Group 3 showed significant improvement in comfort scores with Likert scores of 1.71 ± 0.76 and 1.0 ± 0.0 for the "Easy" and "Difficult" cases, respectively, before simulation and 4.57 ± 0.53 and 2.4 ± 1.1 after simulation.

Conclusions

The ASRM ET Simulator was effective in improving both technical skill and comfort level, particularly for those with little to no ET experience and was most marked when training on a difficult clinical case.

One step further: randomised single-centre trial comparing the direct and afterload techniques of embryo transfer

STUDY QUESTION

What are the differences in ease of use between two different embryo transfer (ET) techniques: the preload direct approach and the afterload approach.

SUMMARY ANSWER

The afterload technique seems to reduce the rate of difficult ETs.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Numerous published trials now document that the ET procedure has an impact on pregnancy and delivery rates after IVF. Difficult transfers should be avoided, as they reduce implantation and pregnancy rates. Preload direct ETs with soft catheters under ultrasound guidance is currently considered the best procedure. However, when using soft catheters, it is not known which technique is preferable or which one should be implemented to reduce the operator factor.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective randomised unblinded controlled clinical trial, included 352 ultrasound-guided ETs assigned to either direct ET or afterload ET, between September 2017 and March 2019. The sample size was calculated based on the historical rate of difficult ETs encountered between 2014 and 2015 with a direct ET procedure.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The inclusion criteria were women 18-38 years old, with BMI between 18 and 28, receiving a single-thawed blastocyst transfer. The exclusion criteria were use of testicular sperm and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles. The primary outcome was the rate of difficult or suboptimal transfers defined as: advancement of the outer sheath (specific for the direct transfer), multiple attempts, use of force, required manipulation, use of a stylet or tenaculum, dilatation, or use of a different catheter. The secondary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 352 frozen ETs were randomised, with 176 patients in each group. The two arms were homogeneous for female and male age, female BMI, duration of infertility, secondary infertility, previous deliveries or miscarriages, myomas, previous surgery to the uterine cavity, cycle day at ovulation trigger, freeze all cycles, first transfers, indication for treatment, endometrial preparation protocol and duration, endometrial thickness, and blastocyst grade at vitrification. Across the entire population, 85 (24.1%) ETs were defined as difficult. The rate of difficult transfers was significantly higher in the direct ET group than in the afterload group: 68 (38.6%) versus 17 (9.7%), respectively (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.30, P < 0.001). The mean percentage in the rate of difficult transfers per operator was 22.5% (SD ± 14.5%), of which 36.1% (SD ± 23.4%) were in the direct group compared with 8.6% (± 8.2%) in the afterload group (P < 0.001). The difficult transfer rate among operators varied from 0 to 43.8% (0-77.8% in the direct group and 0 to 25.0% in the afterload group). The clinical pregnancy rates (42.0% vs 48.3%, P = 0.239 in the direct and afterload groups, respectively) were not significantly different between the groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

There were 18 experienced operators who participated in the trial. Conclusions about the pregnancy rate should not be generalised, since the sample analysis was not performed on this outcome and, although clinically relevant, the difference was not significantly different.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The rate of difficult transfers was significantly higher in the direct ET group compared with the afterload ET group, although a wide variation was observed among operators. Further studies regarding the association between transfer technique and ART outcomes are required.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was sought and there are no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03161119.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

5 April 2017.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

26 September 2017.

The Influence Of Intrauterine Pressure On Embryo Retention In A Catheter After Embryo Transfer

The retention of the embryo in the transfer catheter after embryo transfer (ET) during in vitro fertilization is a very common phenomenon, encountered by even the most experienced operators, and embryos retained in the transfer catheter or its sleeve require a repeat transfer. The exact mechanism of embryo retention has not been explained. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the mechanism of embryo retention in the catheter during embryo transfer by using a transparent uterus model equipped with pressure sensors and a video recorder. The results indicate that pressure changes in the uterine cavity during ET can influence the distribution of the transferred fluid containing the embryo. Under certain conditions, the transferred fluid can flow backward in the catheter, which may lead to retention of the embryo in the catheter.

Estimation of embryo transfer media viscosity and consideration of its effect on media and uterine fluid interactions

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the viscosities of media used for human embryo transfer and what is the possible effect of viscosity as it relates to interactions between transfer media and uterine fluid.

DESIGN

Chamber slide filling times, in seconds, were used to calculate viscosity for each commercial and in-house modified medium, with 12 or 24 replicates per medium under standard operating procedure temperature and gas equilibration conditions used for embryo transfer. Means, standard deviations and coefficients of variation were calculated, and each viscosity was estimated using a regression equation; viscosities for each medium were presented for comparative purposes.

RESULTS

Complete culture media (G1-Plus, G2-Plus, G-TL, 1-Step, Global Total, Global Total HEPES, and Sperm Wash Medium) had viscosity estimates of 1.65 cP, 1.77 cP, 1.68 cP, 1.29cP, 1.18 cP, 1.15 cP, and 1.20 cP, respectively. Complete transfer media (EmbryoGlue, UTM), had viscosity estimates of 3.59 cP and 1.28 cP, respectively. Global HEPES medium with 10%, 20%, 30%, and 50% synthetic serum substitute (SSS) volume per volume had viscosity estimates 1.16 cP, 1.23 cP, 1.25 cP, and 1.34 cP, respectively. For reference, water had a viscosity estimate of 1.06 cP.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively narrow distribution of viscosities was observed across several transfer media despite the various commercial or in-house modifications. These data demonstrate the vast difference between viscosities of embryo transfer media and the assumed viscosity of uterine fluid (1000 cP). Contemporary embryo transfer media may be well-suited for IVF, but evaluation of all variables, e.g. media viscosity in the context of embryo transfer, adds to the knowledge base that should be available to practitioners.

Numerical simulation of embryo transfer: how the viscosity of transferred medium affects the transport of embryos

Background

Embryo transfer (ET) is a key step of assisted reproductive procedures, where the transferred medium containing the embryos is injected into the uterine cavity through a transcervical catheter and blended with intrauterine fluid in the uterine cavity. This procedure determines the delivery sites of embryos in the uterine cavity and has crucial impact on the implantation. Due to practical restrictions and ethical issues, it is often difficult to perform an in vivo study in humans to examine factors that affect the motions and delivery of embryos during ET. Alternatively, mathematical modeling is a powerful tool to that end.

Results

A computational model is developed to simulate the intrauterine mixing flow and track the embryo motions. Two important factors affecting the intrauterine flow are studied via this model: the viscosity of the transferred medium and the injection speed. Numerical results show that the dispersion pattern and the final delivery sites of the embryos are significantly influenced by the viscosity of the transferred medium. Specially, increasing the transferred medium viscosity close to that of the uterine fluid can enhance the probability that the embryos are delivered close to the fundus and keep them from being dragged backward to the cervix during catheter withdrawal. In addition, a slow injection speed can lower the driving force on the embryo during ET, which can prevent the embryo from being injured.

Conclusions

Based on our study, the practice of using a transferred medium with similar viscosity to that of the uterine fluid and a slow injection speed is recommended for real embryo transfer procedures in clinic.

Influence of embryo transfer on embryo preimplantation development

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of injection speeds of the transferred load on embryo development.

DESIGN

A laboratory model for in vitro simulation of ET was developed to investigate the impact of varying injection speeds of the transferred load on embryo development.

SETTING

Academic research institutes of reproduction biotechnology and private centers of reproductive medicine.

ANIMAL(S)

Mouse hybrid F(1) females (C57bl/10 J × CBA-H; N = 15) aged 2-3 months.

INTERVENTION(S)

In vitro exposure of mouse embryos with either the fast ET (ejection speed, >1 m/s) or slow ET (ejection speed, <0.1 m/s) and consecutive culture for 36 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Development rate, morphology and apoptotic index of embryos.

RESULT(S)

The development rate was the slowest in embryos exposed to the fast ET. Morphological changes in response to ET were observed only among embryos exposed to the fast ET. The mean apoptotic index was 17.6% in the group exposed to the fast ET, 5.6% in the group exposed to the slow ET, and 2.58% in the control group.

CONCLUSION(S)

A reduction of the ejection speed of the transferred load allows avoidance of a developmental delay and diminishes injury of the embryos. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest transferring the embryos at the lowest possible ejection speed.

Pressure induced nucleus DNA fragmentation

PURPOSE

The present study was designed to investigate the impact of pressure on nuclear DNA integrity in viable cells of mouse blastocysts.

METHODS

The blastocysts of hybrid F1 females [(C57Bl/10 J × CBA-H);N = 15] aged 2-3 months were exposed into the pressure impulse lasting ~0.021 s and characterized by a positive pressure peak of ~76 mmHg. The nuclear DNA fragmentation index of mouse blastocysts was assessed by TUNEL assay within 60 s after exposure to pressure impulse.

RESULTS

The mean nuclear DNA fragmentation index was significantly higher in the experimental group (83%) than in the control group (19.7%); p < 0.001.

CONCLUSION(S)

A low magnitude pressure impulse can induce nuclear DNA fragmentation in mouse blastocysts. The compression and decompression forces appearing during pressure fluctuations are responsible for the observed DNA shearing.