Physician experience in performing embryo transfers may affect outcome

Embryo transfer learning using medical simulation tools: a comparison of two embryo transfer simulators

INTRODUCTION

Embryo transfer(ET) is one of the main procedures to become pregnant by assisted reproductive technology(ART). Simulation training is a way to improve the skills of clinicians. The objective of this study was to evaluate the interest of trainees in learning embryo transfer using simulators.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An observational study was conducted at the University hospital-based research center. Trainees, comprising midwives and resident or graduated gynecologists, who attended the medical training for infertility and ART in June 2019, were included. They trained on two ET simulators (Simulator A and B) and complete an anonymously online questionnaire. A sub-group analysis focusing on graduated gynecologists not performing ET in current practice, was performed.

RESULTS

Thirty-two trainees were included. Trainees felt that ET simulators should be used in medical education to promote learning how to perform the ET procedure (n=26, 81.3% for Simulator A and n=21, 65.5% for Simulator B; p=0.31). The use of both simulators improved the level of self-confidence (81.3% and 75.0% respectively; p=0.55). Significant differences in the global and in the subgroup analysis (n=24) in favor of Simulator A were observed regarding learning the precision of the ET procedure (p<0.01), the pathway to introduce the catheter into the uterine cavity (p<0.05), and the guidance for proper placement of the catheter into the uterine cavity (p=0.03). In the subgroup analysis of graduated gynecologists not performing ET in current practice, Simulator A was found more realistic for the visualization of the introduction of the catheter into the uterine cavity (p=0.01) and more useful to learn about difficult cases (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Students expressed a high level of interest in ET simulators to improve their skills. Although the simulators displayed some differences regarding learning the precision of the ET procedure, both improved the level of self-confidence. This new learning method needs to be further developed in order to offer to trainees the most realistic simulators.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was approved for publication by the Ethics Review Committee of the Cochin University Hospital (CLEP) (n° AAA-2020-08016) retrospectively registered.

Effect of retained embryos on pregnancy outcomes of in vitro fertilization: a matched retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To explore the incidence of retained embryos (REs) in embryo transfer (ET) cycles and its effects on pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

This was a matched retrospective cohort study involving 29,160 ET cycles conducted from March 2016 to February 2021, in which ET cycles without RE were matched to the RE group at a 2:1 ratio. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, miscarriage, and live birth rates were compared between the with-RE and without-RE groups.

RESULTS

Our study showed that the overall incidence of REs was 0.33% (95/29,160). There was a statistically significant difference in RE rate among the operators (P < 0.001), suggesting that the embryo retention rate may be affected by the individual operator. A total of 95 repeated ET cycles due to RE were included in the study group, and 190 ET cycles without RE were matched to the study group (1:2). There were no significant differences between the RE and matched groups in terms of implantation rate (35.6 vs. 38.0%; P = 0.608), clinical pregnancy rate (47.4 vs. 54.7%; P = 0.240), biochemical pregnancy rate (5.3 vs. 4.7%; P = 0.846), miscarriage rate (11.1 vs. 9.6%; P = 0.781), ectopic pregnancy rate (2.2 vs. 1.9%; P = 1.000) or live birth rate (41.1 vs. 48.9%; P = 0.208).

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings demonstrated that immediate retransfer of REs did not significantly affect IVF outcomes, which may provide counselling information for patients when REs are identified and ET is reattempted. The incidence of REs was associated with the operator who expelled the embryos from the catheter. Attention to detail and frequent assessment of the operator's technique may facilitate avoidance of embryo retention.

Estimation Methods for Infertility Treatment Success: Comparison of Four Methods

Objective: To analyze and compare four methods for estimating the chance of treatment success in infertile couples.

Materials and methods: In a retrospective cohort study, information on demographic and clinical features, including age, body mass index (BMI), duration of infertility, semen analysis, previous history of treatment and clinical examination of infertile couples were analyzed. Treatment success (childbearing) was calculated with four methods as live birth ratio, conditional probability and survival analysis (life table and Kaplan-Meyer method) and results are compared.

Results: The fertility ratio for the first treatment cycle was 29.72% which decreased to 23.13% by total treatment cycles. The success rate was 75.4%. With conditional probability calculation at the end of the five treatment cycles. With the life table method in a five-year period, the probability for live birth was 78% and by Kaplan-Meyer method 73.1% and the median of treatment time was 562 days.

Conclusion: Calculation of infertility treatment success rate by only simple live birth ratio of childbearing couples is associated with underestimation. Using the conditional probability method reduces that underestimation, but it is not considered the censored cases in the treatments. It seems life table (as a proxy of survival analysis) presents the closest estimation to clinical facts with considering the repetition of the treatment cycle and the duration of treatment.

One step further: randomised single-centre trial comparing the direct and afterload techniques of embryo transfer

STUDY QUESTION

What are the differences in ease of use between two different embryo transfer (ET) techniques: the preload direct approach and the afterload approach.

SUMMARY ANSWER

The afterload technique seems to reduce the rate of difficult ETs.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Numerous published trials now document that the ET procedure has an impact on pregnancy and delivery rates after IVF. Difficult transfers should be avoided, as they reduce implantation and pregnancy rates. Preload direct ETs with soft catheters under ultrasound guidance is currently considered the best procedure. However, when using soft catheters, it is not known which technique is preferable or which one should be implemented to reduce the operator factor.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective randomised unblinded controlled clinical trial, included 352 ultrasound-guided ETs assigned to either direct ET or afterload ET, between September 2017 and March 2019. The sample size was calculated based on the historical rate of difficult ETs encountered between 2014 and 2015 with a direct ET procedure.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The inclusion criteria were women 18-38 years old, with BMI between 18 and 28, receiving a single-thawed blastocyst transfer. The exclusion criteria were use of testicular sperm and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) cycles. The primary outcome was the rate of difficult or suboptimal transfers defined as: advancement of the outer sheath (specific for the direct transfer), multiple attempts, use of force, required manipulation, use of a stylet or tenaculum, dilatation, or use of a different catheter. The secondary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 352 frozen ETs were randomised, with 176 patients in each group. The two arms were homogeneous for female and male age, female BMI, duration of infertility, secondary infertility, previous deliveries or miscarriages, myomas, previous surgery to the uterine cavity, cycle day at ovulation trigger, freeze all cycles, first transfers, indication for treatment, endometrial preparation protocol and duration, endometrial thickness, and blastocyst grade at vitrification. Across the entire population, 85 (24.1%) ETs were defined as difficult. The rate of difficult transfers was significantly higher in the direct ET group than in the afterload group: 68 (38.6%) versus 17 (9.7%), respectively (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.09-0.30, P < 0.001). The mean percentage in the rate of difficult transfers per operator was 22.5% (SD ± 14.5%), of which 36.1% (SD ± 23.4%) were in the direct group compared with 8.6% (± 8.2%) in the afterload group (P < 0.001). The difficult transfer rate among operators varied from 0 to 43.8% (0-77.8% in the direct group and 0 to 25.0% in the afterload group). The clinical pregnancy rates (42.0% vs 48.3%, P = 0.239 in the direct and afterload groups, respectively) were not significantly different between the groups.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

There were 18 experienced operators who participated in the trial. Conclusions about the pregnancy rate should not be generalised, since the sample analysis was not performed on this outcome and, although clinically relevant, the difference was not significantly different.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The rate of difficult transfers was significantly higher in the direct ET group compared with the afterload ET group, although a wide variation was observed among operators. Further studies regarding the association between transfer technique and ART outcomes are required.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No specific funding was sought and there are no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03161119.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

5 April 2017.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT'S ENROLMENT

26 September 2017.

The human factor: does the operator performing the embryo transfer significantly impact the cycle outcome?

STUDY QUESTION

Is Ongoing Pregnancy Rate (OPR) operator-dependent, and can experience improve embryo transfer efficiency?

SUMMARY ANSWER

OPR is influenced by the operators who perform the embryo transfer (ET), and experience does not assure proficiency for everyone.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

ET remains the critical step in assisted reproduction. Although many other factors such as embryo quality and uterine receptivity impact embryo implantation, the proper ET technique is clearly an operator-dependent variable and as such it should be objectively standardized.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Retrospective comparative analysis including all fresh ETs performed between January 1996 and December 2016 at the Humanitas Fertility Center after IVF—ICSI cycles.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

IVF/ICSI fresh ETs performed by 32 operators, 19 824 cycles in all, were analyzed. All transfers consisting of freehand insertion of a preloaded soft catheter into the uterine cavity under transabdominal ultrasound guidance were considered. Two different statistical analyses were performed. First, a logistic regression model with a random intercept for the operator was used to estimate the heterogeneity of the rate of success among operators, accounting for woman age, FSH, number of oocytes retrieved, fertilization rate, year of the procedure, number and stage of transferred embryos and operator’s experience. Second, the relationship between experience and pregnancy rate was estimated separately for each operator by logistic regression, and operator-specific results were combined and compared in a random-effects meta-analysis. In both analyses, the operator’s experience at time t was measured in terms of number of embryo transfers performed before t.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The heterogeneity among operators was highly significant (P value <0.001) and explained 44.5% of the total variability. The odds ratio of success of the worst operator in respect to the mean was equal to 0.84. For the best operator, the odds ratio of success was equal to 1.13 in respect to the mean. Based on the meta-analysis of the relationship between operator’s experience and success rate, it resulted that, on average, the operators’ performance did not improve with additional transfers.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

At our center, operators become independent for ET’s after performing between 30 and 50 transfers under supervision. It is also possible that other relevant factors, such as embryologists on duty for the ET, have not been included in the present analysis and this may represent a potential bias. Among these, it should be mentioned that the embryologists on duty for the ET were not taken into consideration.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Continued performance analysis and the use of a digital simulator could help operators to test their expertise over time and either correct poor performance or avoid doing transfers.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03561129.

Simulation training for embryo transfer: findings from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Certificate Course

OBJECTIVE

To assess the value of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Certificate Course in confidence and skill building for performing a live embryo transfer (ET).

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Two-day simulation workshops of reproductive endocrine and infertility (REI) fellows from American Board of Obstetrics and Gynecology-approved training programs, using four different uterine models (A-D).

PATIENT(S)

None.

INTERVENTION(S)

Didactic and hands-on simulation training program.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Primary outcomes included ET simulation scores of all exercises analyzed at various points of the training and self-assessed confidence before and after the completion of the Embryo Transfer Certificate Course based on a 6-point Likert scale and association of both with extent of prior live ET experience and year of fellowship.

RESULT(S)

Data were collected for 78 REI fellows who completed the Embryo Transfer Certificate Course and demonstrated significant improvements in both skill and confidence. The data for a subset of 58 fellows who performed five direct transfers on both Embryo Transfer Certificate Course uterine models A and B demonstrated significant overall improvement in ET simulation scores between the first and fifth direct transfers. A separate data subset of 57 fellows who performed five afterload transfers for each exercise on all four uterine models demonstrated differences in difficulty among them. Embryo transfer simulation using the uterine A model was consistently the easiest. The ET simulation scores for fellows using the uterine B and C models showed a progressive and significant increase across the five afterload ETs. When using the uterine D model, ET simulation scores increased significantly between the first and second transfers but remained at the same level for the remaining three transfers. Except for uterus A, a significant increase in ET simulation scores between the first and last transfers was observed for fellows overall in all afterload transfers and for those fellows with <50 prior live transfers. Data for all 78 fellows demonstrate a significant gain of self-confidence for all parameters, with the highest overall increase (78%) observed for first-year fellows as well as for fellows of any year with no prior live transfer experience (109%). Fellows with the largest number of prior live ET experience started with higher confidence, which also increased significantly, although they had a lower gain in confidence compared with fellows with less experience.

CONCLUSION(S)

The American Society for Reproductive Medicine Embryo Transfer Certificate Course data analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of simulator-based ET training for REI fellows across the 3 years of training, regardless of prior experience with live ET.

Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Embryo Transfers of Cases with and without Catheter Rotation during Its Withdrawal

OBJECTIVE

To compare embryo transfer (ET) technique based on catheter rotation during its withdrawal in cases with unexplained infertility in a prospective, randomized trial (NCT03097042).

METHODS

Two hundred intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) patients undergoing ET with cleaving or blastocyst-stage fresh embryos were randomized into 2 groups: cases with (n = 100), and without (n = 100) catheter rotation during its withdrawal. Groups were matched for age and some clinical parameters. A soft catheter was used to transfer a single embryo with catheter rotation during its withdrawal in the study group and without rotation in the control. The use of a stiff catheter or tenaculum was not needed in any case. Groups were compared in terms of cycle characteristics and clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULTS

Pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the study group (41 vs. 26%, p = 0.04). Clinical pregnancy rate was also significantly higher in the study group (39 vs. 25%, OR 1.9 [1.1-3.5], p = 0.05). On the other hand, the ongoing pregnancy rate was similar between the 2 groups (33 vs. 23%, p = 0.2).

CONCLUSION

Catheter rotation during its withdrawal may be associated with increased pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates; however, the difference in ongoing pregnancy rates did not reach statistical significance.

Embryo transfer simulation improves pregnancy rates and decreases time to proficiency in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility fellow embryo transfers

OBJECTIVE

To design and evaluate an ET simulator to train Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI) fellows' techniques of ET.

DESIGN

Simulation model development and retrospective cohort analysis.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

Patients undergoing IVF.

INTERVENTION(S)

Simulation model evaluation and implementation of ET simulation training.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

The REI fellow and faculty evaluation responses (n = 19/21 [90%]) of the model demonstrated realistic characteristics, with evaluators concluding the model was suitable for training in almost all evaluated areas. A total of 12 REI fellows who performed ET were analyzed: 6 before ET trainer and 6 after ET trainer. Pregnancy rates were 31% in the initial 10 ETs per fellow before simulator vs. 46% after simulator. One of six pre-ET trainer fellows (17%) had pregnancy rates ≥40% in their first 10 ETs; whereas four of six post-ET trainer fellows had pregnancy rates ≥40% in their first 10 ETs. The average number of ETs to obtain >40% pregnancy efficiency was 27 ETs before trainer vs. 15 ETs after trainer. Pregnancy rates were similar in the two groups after 20 ETs, and collective terminal pregnancy rates were >50% after 40 ETs.

CONCLUSION(S)

Embryo transfer simulation improved REI fellow pregnancy rates in their first 10 transfers and led to a more rapid ET proficiency. These data suggest potential value in adopting ET simulation, even in programs with a robust history of live ET in fellowship training.

Large randomized trial comparing transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer with a technique based on uterine length measurement before embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To compare in a randomized, non-inferiority trial the embryo transfer (ET) technique based on uterine length measurement before transfer (ULMbET) with transabdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer (TA-UGET) in a large population of patients undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF).

METHODS

Patients undergoing IVF with ET with cleaving fresh embryos were randomized to receive ULMbET or TA-UGET. The transfer of one to three embryos on day 2-3 of culture was performed using a soft catheter either under transabdominal ultrasound guidance (TA-UGET group) or after measurement of the uterine cavity by transvaginal ultrasound and calculation of the discharge site (ULMbET group). The primary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate and implantation rate, and secondary outcomes included patient discomfort during ET.

RESULTS

A total of 1648 patients undergoing IVF were randomized to receive ULMbET (n = 828) or TA-UGET (n = 820) and were included in the analysis. Comparable clinical pregnancy rate (38.2% vs 38.9%), implantation rate (24.8% vs 25.2%) and ongoing pregnancy rate (33.1% vs 34.8%) were observed in ULMbET and TA-UGET groups. The discomfort intensity score and the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe discomfort during ET were significantly higher in the TA-UGET group (2.6 vs 1.5 visual analog scale points and 19.8% vs 1.2%; P = 0.045 and P = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The ULMbET technique leads to IVF results comparable to those obtained with UGET, but is better tolerated than is TA-UGET and is technically easier to perform for a single operator. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Ultrasound guidance during embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To summarize the current evidence on the effect of using ultrasound (US) guidance during embryo transfer (ET).

METHODS

In this systematic review, we included randomized controlled trials examining the effect of the use of US guidance during ET; data from studies using the same catheter type in study arms were not pooled with the results from studies that used different catheter types.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the quantitative analysis: 18 compared 'US guidance' with 'clinical touch', of which one was subsequently excluded from the quantitative meta-analysis owing to a lack of available data, three studies compared transvaginal US guidance with transabdominal US guidance, and one study compared 'hysterosonometry before ET' with US guidance. Comparison of the use of US guidance with clinical touch, in studies that used the same catheter type in the study arms, indicated a benefit of using US guidance during ET on the rates of live birth (relative risk (RR), 1.48 (95% CI, 1.16-1.87)), based on two studies involving 888 women with moderate-quality evidence, and on the rates of clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.18-1.46)), based on 13 studies involving 3641 women with high-quality evidence. However, when comparing the use of US guidance with clinical touch in studies that used different catheter types, the results suggest that using US guidance during ET has no effect on the rates of reproductive outcome: live birth (RR, 0.99 (95% CI, 0.83-1.19)), based on one study involving 1649 women with moderate-quality evidence; clinical pregnancy (RR, 1.04 (95% CI, 0.89-1.21)), based on five studies involving 2949 women with moderate-quality evidence. The estimates for the rate of miscarriage and for the other identified comparisons were imprecise.

CONCLUSIONS

The available evidence suggests that there is a benefit of using US guidance during ET. However, both US-guided transfer and clinical touch should be considered acceptable, as the benefit of US is not large and should be balanced against the increased cost and need to change the catheter type. More studies are required before conclusions can be drawn regarding the effect of other techniques on reproductive outcome.

Modeling Embryo Transfer into a Closed Uterine Cavity

Embryo transfer (ET) is the last manual intervention after extracorporeal fertilization. After the ET procedure is completed, the embryos are conveyed in the uterus for another two to four days due to spontaneous uterine peristalsis until the window time for implantation. The role of intrauterine fluid flow patterns in transporting the embryos to their implantation site during and after ET was simulated by injection of a liquid bolus into a two-dimensional liquid-filled channel with a closed fundal end via a liquid-filled catheter inserted in the channel. Numerical experiments revealed that the intrauterine fluid field and the embryos transport pattern were strongly affected by the closed fundal end. The embryos re-circulated in small loops around the vicinity where they were deposited from the catheter. The transport pattern was controlled by the uterine peristalsis factors, such as amplitude and frequency of the uterine walls motility, as well as the synchronization between the onset of catheter discharge and uterine peristalsis. The outcome of ET was also dependent on operating parameters such as placement of the catheter tip within the uterine cavity and the delivery speed of the catheter load. In conclusion, this modeling study highlighted important parameters that should be considered during ET procedures in order to increase the potential for pregnancy success.