1
|
Quintigliano M, Carone N, Speranza AM, Tanzilli A, Baiocco R, Barone L, Pastorelli C, Lingiardi V. Adolescent Development and the Parent-Adolescent Relationship in Diverse Family Forms Created by Assisted Reproduction. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:16758. [PMID: 36554637 PMCID: PMC9778924 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192416758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs) are employed by single individuals and couples who are not otherwise able to conceive spontaneously. While the use of ARTs is increasing, research is lacking on the attempts made by adolescent offspring conceived via ARTs to integrate their ART conception into their identity and negotiate a connection with, and autonomy from, their parents. The present article reviews studies investigating adolescent development and the parent-adolescent relationship in diverse family forms created by ARTs (mainly heterosexual and lesbian parent families), and discusses the results in light of attachment, identity development, and emotional distance regulation theories. Overall, the results indicate that the psychological adjustment of adolescents conceived via ARTs is not undermined by the manner of their conception, and that they enjoy positive relationships with their parents with no difference from those enjoyed by spontaneously conceived adolescents. However, it remains unknown whether the development of a reproductive identity in adolescence is likely to influence adolescents' interest in searching for or contacting their donors, surrogates, and/or donor siblings. The results suggest the relevance of considering the parent-adolescent relationship, disclosure, and identity formation issues when planning psychological counseling and support interventions with ART parents and their adolescent offspring, and emphasize the need to further investigate these aspects in diverse ART families, including single-, gay-, bisexual-, and trans*-parent families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Quintigliano
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Carone
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Speranza
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Annalisa Tanzilli
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Roberto Baiocco
- Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Lavinia Barone
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 11, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Concetta Pastorelli
- Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Vittorio Lingiardi
- Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, and Health Studies, Sapienza University of Rome, Via degli Apuli 1, 00185 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kazmerski TM, West NE, Jain R, Uluer A, Georgiopoulos AM, Aitken ML, Taylor-Cousar JL. Family-building and parenting considerations for people with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr Pulmonol 2022; 57 Suppl 1:S75-S88. [PMID: 34407321 PMCID: PMC9292426 DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25620] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
As people with cystic fibrosis (CF) live longer and healthier lives, increasing numbers are considering the full range of reproductive options for their futures, including parenthood, pregnancy, or pregnancy prevention. As the face of CF changes, the CF care model must adapt to meet the reproductive health needs of both parents and nonparents with CF. This article summarizes the reproductive goals and family-building concerns faced by people with CF, including fertility, pregnancy, and alternative paths to parenthood, the impact of parenthood on mental and physical health, and important future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Traci M Kazmerski
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
- Center for Women's Health Research and Innovation (CWHRI), University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Natalie E West
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Raksha Jain
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ahmet Uluer
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anna M Georgiopoulos
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Moira L Aitken
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kirkman-Brown J, Calhaz-Jorge C, Dancet EAF, Lundin K, Martins M, Tilleman K, Thorn P, Vermeulen N, Frith L. OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac001. [PMID: 35178481 PMCID: PMC8847071 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What information and support should be offered to donors, intended parents and donor-conceived people, in general and in consideration of the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and matching services? SUMMARY ANSWER For donors, intended parents and donor-conceived offspring, recommendations are made that cover information needs and informed consent, psychosocial implications and disclosure. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Trends indicate that the use of donor-assisted conception is growing and guidance is needed to help these recipients/intended parents, the donors and offspring, navigate the rapidly changing environment in which donor-assisted conception takes place. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A working group (WG) collaborated on writing recommendations based, where available, on evidence collected from a literature search and expert opinion. Draft recommendations were published for stakeholder review and adapted where relevant based on the comments received. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Papers retrieved from PUBMED were included from 1 January 2014 up to 31 August 2020, focusing on studies published since direct-to-consumer genetic testing has become more widespread and accessible. The current paper is limited to reproductive donation performed in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) centres (and gamete banks): donation outside the medical context was not considered. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In total, 32 recommendations were made for information provision and support to donors, 32 for intended parents and 27 for donor-conceived offspring requesting information/support. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The available evidence in the area of reproductive donation is limited and diverse with regards to the context and types of donation. General conclusions and recommendations are largely based on expert opinion and may need to be adapted in light of future research. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS These recommendations provide guidance to MAR centres and gamete banks on good practice in information provision and support but should also be considered by regulatory bodies and policymakers at a national and international level to guide regulatory and legislative efforts towards the protection of donors and donor-conceived offspring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) The development of this good practice paper was funded by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), covering expenses associated with the WG meetings, the literature searches and dissemination. The WG members did not receive any payment. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. DISCLAIMER This document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation. The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type. †ESHRE pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jackson Kirkman-Brown
- Centre for Human Reproductive Science, University of Birmingham, IMSR, Birmingham, UK
- Correspondence address. University of Birmingham, IMSR, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK. E-mail: ;
| | | | - Eline A F Dancet
- KU Leuven, Department of Development and Regeneration, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kersti Lundin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Mariana Martins
- University of Porto, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Porto, Portugal
| | - Kelly Tilleman
- Department for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Petra Thorn
- Private Practice, Couple and Family Therapy, Infertility Counseling, Mörfelden, Germany
| | - Nathalie Vermeulen
- European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Central Office, Strombeek-Bever, Belgium
| | - Lucy Frith
- Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kirkman-Brown JC, Martins MV. 'Genes versus children': if the goal is parenthood, are we using the optimal approach? Hum Reprod 2021; 35:5-11. [PMID: 31916579 PMCID: PMC6993870 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2019] [Revised: 10/27/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
First medical contact for couples trying for a child will usually emphasise the array of assistance available to ‘help them have their own child’, usually with options involving ART, after diagnosis. For many poorer prognosis couples, this means repetitive unsuccessful cycles of invasive and stressful treatment. What is sometimes lost at this stage is a reflection on the likelihood of success of different options, which may lead patients to focus on hoping for their own ‘genetic’ progeny, but failing to consider the alternative and potentially more successful other options, including donation and adoption, for achieving parenthood of a child. Factors not only such as female age but also advanced requirements such as preimplantation genetic testing or even mitochondrial replacement therapies all have reduced chances of success but further tend to reinforce the importance of a genetic link. The financial, physical and psychosocial burden associated with cumulative failure also lead to a higher probability of dropout and consequently an even higher probability of remaining in involuntary childlessness. We advocate formulation of a detailed roadmap for discussion of parenthood, with reference explanation to genetics and epigenetics, which gives due consideration to the psychological effects from the beginning to end of the treatment process, alongside a balanced consideration of the likelihood of treatment success and discussion of other options. Only when we provide patients with the service of a clear and transparent discussion of these matters, we will really realise the true potential of our field, which may then be better considered as assisted families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson C Kirkman-Brown
- Centre for Human Reproductive Science, IMSR, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.,Birmingham Women's Fertility Centre, Birmingham Women's & Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham B15 2TG, UK
| | - Mariana V Martins
- Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal.,Centre for Psychology at University of Porto, Porto 4200-135, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Behjati Ardakani Z, Navabakhsh M, Ranjbar F, Akhondi MM, Mohseni Tabrizi A. Step-by-step decision-making process in third party assisted reproduction: a qualitative study. HUM FERTIL 2020; 25:487-498. [PMID: 32907411 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2020.1817579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
This study explores the experience of decision-making about the third party assisted reproduction in Iranian infertile patients using a qualitative approach. Data were collected in 2017-2019 through in-depth interviews of 20 infertile participants (3 couples and 14 individuals) who became pregnant or had children through third-party reproduction and 12 specialists. The interviews were transcribed verbatim, the data were managed using the MAXQDA 10 and analysed using a conventional content analysis approach. The main category that emerged was 'step-by-step process of adjustment to third party assisted reproduction'. From this, five sub-categories were extracted: (i) 'parental preference for biological children over non-biological children'; (ii) 'parental preference for non-biological children over childlessness threats'; (iii) 'strong preference for having partial genetic link with children'; (iv) 'flexibility in removing or overcoming barriers to third party reproduction'; and (v) 'parental preference for adopted children over childlessness'. The findings in the present study suggest the importance of lineage and biological relatedness in Iranian culture. Patients adjusted to non-biological parenting as a treatment option only if they have to. Using a step-by-step decision-making process helped participants make more thoughtful decisions by organising relevant information and defining alternatives. The results of the present study can help healthcare providers with counselling regarding parenting with or without genetic ties.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mehrdad Navabakhsh
- Faculty of Humanistic and Social Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
| | - Fahimeh Ranjbar
- Nursing Care Research Center, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Mehdi Akhondi
- Reproductive Biotechnology Research Center, Avicenna Research Institute, ACECR, Tehran Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hemalal S, Yee S, Ross L, Loutfy M, Librach C. Same-sex male couples and single men having children using assisted reproductive technology: a quantitative analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 42:1033-1047. [PMID: 33593703 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2020] [Revised: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/24/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION How do same-sex male couples (SSMC) and single men perceive their experience of using assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Canada; what factors contribute to their experience and the decisions made throughout the ART process? DESIGN This cross-sectional study used an anonymous online survey to gather exploratory data (between August 2018 and August 2019) about participant experience and decision-making considerations, for SSMC and single men internationally who had undergone ART in Canada. The survey was accessed by 145 individuals; 98 participants were included in the final analysis. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) was used for quantitative analysis. RESULTS Four out of five participants had a positive overall experience of using ART in Canada. Having the social support of knowing others who had previously pursued ART, and needing to work with multiple egg donors, were found to affect overall experience significantly. Agencies were the most common way for intended parents to connect with third parties. Major factors men considered when choosing an egg donor included medical history, physical attributes, personality and temperament, ethnicity, and education; they tended to select gestational surrogates who had similar lifestyle values to themselves. Most coupled survey respondents created embryos using each partner's spermatozoa (73.6%). CONCLUSIONS This exploratory study expands on limited knowledge of the current topic, identifying key areas for future research. Most SSMC and single men, domestic and internationally, had a positive experience pursuing ART in Canada to have children. Research on the experiences of SSMC and single men and decision-making considerations should continue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shilini Hemalal
- Create Fertility Centre, 790 Bay Street, Suite 1100, Toronto Ontario M5G1N8, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Samantha Yee
- Create Fertility Centre, 790 Bay Street, Suite 1100, Toronto Ontario M5G1N8, Canada
| | - Lori Ross
- Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College Street, Toronto Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada; Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto Ontario M5T 1R8, Canada
| | - Mona Loutfy
- Department of Medicine, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, 155 College Street, Toronto Ontario M5T 3M6, Canada; Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto Ontario M5G 1N8, Canada; Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
| | - Clifford Librach
- Create Fertility Centre, 790 Bay Street, Suite 1100, Toronto Ontario M5G1N8, Canada; Institute of Medical Sciences, Medical Sciences Building, University of Toronto, 1 King's College Circle, Toronto Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Suite 1200, Toronto Ontario M5G 1E2, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Circle, Toronto Ontario M5S 3K1, Canada; Department of Gynecology, Women's College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Toronto Ontario M5G 1N8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Oocyte donor's emotions towards the potential offspring: Development and psychometric properties. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 252:313-316. [PMID: 32652481 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 06/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of the present study was to develop a questionnaire for assessing the emotional feelings of the women donors towards the potential offspring resulting from assisted reproductive techniques. STUDY DESIGN Construct validity was evaluated in a cross-sectional study of 150 Iranian oocyte-donating women who undergoing donor egg programs in Isfahan- Iran. The self-report questionnaire was completed within one to ten days after the oocyte donation. Reliability was determined using internal consistency and stability. RESULTS The results of the factor analysis were extracted with 3 factors with a predictive power of 89.57 % in 12 items. The internal reliability of the questionnaire was calculated based on Cronbach's alpha coefficient 0.792. The stability of the questionnaire was confirmed based on intra class correlation index (0.71). CONCLUSION The 12-item questionnaire is a valid tool for assessing the emotions of oocyte donors shortly after doing donor egg programs.
Collapse
|
8
|
Jacobson H. A limited market: the recruitment of gay men as surrogacy clients by the infertility industry in the USA. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2018; 7:14-23. [PMID: 30555951 PMCID: PMC6280596 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2018.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Revised: 08/20/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Abstract
Gestational surrogacy via egg donation is an expensive - and sometimes ambivalently undertaken - but increasingly popular route to planned fatherhood for some gay men. The surrogacy market in the USA plays an important role for gay men with the financial resources to access these services, as it is currently the only stable, commercial market in which there are legal protections for openly gay men. While a small, ethnographic and qualitative literature on the experiences of gay fathers via surrogacy exists, less is known about the state of the surrogacy industry towards gay men as clients. Here I investigate the surrogacy industry in the USA to ask how welcome gay men are in this market. I do so via a content analysis of patient/client recruitment on infertility clinic and surrogacy agency websites. Content analysis of 547 websites indicates that the majority of infertility clinics (62%) and 42% of surrogacy agencies do not directly advertise or appear to be welcoming to gay men. A minority of gay-friendly clinics and agencies, which cluster geographically, actively recruit gay men, creating a limited but niche market. The unequal recruitment of gay men as infertility clients reflects how normative ideas about gender, sexuality and social class are reproduced in the infertility industry. This, in turn, may impact gay men's procreative consciousness and decision-making about parenting, and exacerbate inequalities around their access to intentional genetic parenthood.
Collapse
|
9
|
Sälevaara M, Punamäki RL, Unkila-Kallio L, Vänskä M, Tulppala M, Tiitinen A. The mental health of mothers and fathers during pregnancy and early parenthood after successful oocyte donation treatment: A nested case-control study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97:1478-1485. [PMID: 29975790 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim of this study was to compare the mental health problems between parents after oocyte donation treatment, after in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) with own gametes and after naturally conceiving (NC). MATERIAL AND METHODS This is a prospective, longitudinal questionnaire study. The study group consisted of 26 oocyte donation mothers and their matched IVF/ICSI (n = 52) and NC (n = 52) controls. Matching was performed according to mother's age, parity, type of pregnancy, and number of returned questionnaires. The parents filled-in the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-36) at gestational weeks 18-20 (T1), and at 2 months (T2) and 12 months (T3) after the childbirth. RESULTS Full response rate (T1-T3) for oocyte donation mothers was 76.9% and for oocyte donation fathers was 73.1%. At T1, no significant differences were found between groups in depression, anxiety, sleeping difficulties, or social dysfunction, but they differed at T2 and T3 in anxiety (T2, P = .02; T3, P = .01), in sleeping difficulties (T2, P = .02; T3, P = .04) and in social dysfunction (T2, P = .01; T3, P = .04). Oocyte donation mothers showed less anxiety than NC mothers (T2, T3), and fewer sleeping difficulties and less social dysfunction than IVF/ICSI (T2, T3) and NC mothers (T2). Mental health problems of oocyte donation fathers did not differ from those of IVF/ICSI and NC control fathers at T1-T3. CONCLUSIONS Oocyte donation mothers showed fewer mental health symptoms in early parenthood compared with IVF/ICSI and NC mothers. No differences were found among mothers during pregnancy and among fathers at any time point.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Sälevaara
- Väestöliitto Fertility Clinic Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Leila Unkila-Kallio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Mervi Vänskä
- Faculty of Social Sciences/Psychology, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | - Maija Tulppala
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Aila Tiitinen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Abstract
Assistive reproductive technology has progressed significantly over the past few decades. In spite of the advances, people may still resort to a surrogate for bearing and birthing a baby. Surrogacy, though an altruistic act, has been commercialized in the past few years, leading to emergence of several ethico-legal concerns. Nurses care for the surrogates, the infants, and the intended parents through their journey with sensitivity, advocacy, compassion, and confidentiality. This article intends to explore the implications of surrogacy to individuals, families, nations, and health care.
Collapse
|
12
|
Rizk M, Pawlak S. A case report of embryo donation: ethical and clinical implications for psychologists. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2016; 42:659-664. [PMID: 27343285 DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2015-103304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Third-party reproduction is a growing field, and an increasing body of literature considers the ethics of embryo donation. Due to the psychosocial complexities that generally accompany the donation and/or use of donor embryos, psychologists can play a pivotal role in these specialised fertility cases. While laws in the USA are in place to regulate the medical procedures involved in embryo donation, only unenforceable guidelines exist for psychologists specialising in fertility cases. The presentation of this case study aims to: (1) clarify the ethical concerns that fertility psychologists should consider in similar situations by assessing whether American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the American Psychological Association (APA) guidelines compete or complement one another within this case of embryo donation and (2) consider the interests, obligations and rights of all parties involved. Several principles, standards and guidelines that must be considered are described. Overall, the APA Ethics Code and the ASRM Guidelines appear to complement one another for most aspects of this case. Fertility psychologists should consider the clinical implications of the interests, rights and duties of all involved parties, including themselves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marianne Rizk
- Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Stacey Pawlak
- Department of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA Department of Psychiatry, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| |
Collapse
|