No major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes between uninterrupted embryo culture in time-lapse system and conventional embryo culture

STUDY QUESTION

Is embryo culture in a closed time-lapse system associated with any differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes in comparison to conventional culture and spontaneous conception?

SUMMARY ANSWER

There were no significant differences between time-lapse and conventional embryo culture in preterm birth (PTB, <37 weeks), low birth weight (LBW, >2500 g) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy for singleton deliveries, the primary outcomes of this study.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Evidence from prospective trials evaluating the safety of time-lapse incubation for clinical use show similar embryo development rates, implantation rates, and ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates when compared to conventional incubation. Few studies have investigated if uninterrupted culture can alter risks of adverse perinatal outcomes presently associated with IVF when compared to conventional culture and spontaneous conceptions.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study is a Swedish population-based retrospective registry study, including 7379 singleton deliveries after fresh embryo transfer between 2013 and 2018 from selected IVF clinics. Perinatal outcomes of singletons born from time-lapse-cultured embryos were compared to singletons from embryos cultured in conventional incubators and 71 300 singletons from spontaneous conceptions. Main perinatal outcomes included PTB and LBW. Main maternal outcomes included hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pregnancy hypertension and preeclampsia).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

From nine IVF clinics, 2683 singletons born after fresh embryo transfer in a time-lapse system were compared to 4696 singletons born after culture in a conventional incubator and 71 300 singletons born after spontaneous conception matched for year of birth, parity, and maternal age. Patient and treatment characteristics from IVF deliveries were cross-linked with the Swedish Medical Birth Register, Register of Birth Defects, National Patient Register and Statistics Sweden. Children born after sperm and oocyte donation cycles and after Preimplantation Genetic testing cycles were excluded. Odds ratio (OR) and adjusted OR were calculated, adjusting for relevant confounders.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the adjusted analyses, no significant differences were found for risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.87-1.41) and LBW (adjusted OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66-1.14) or hypertensive disorders of pregnancy; preeclampsia and hypertension (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.67-1.45 and adjusted OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.62-1.53, respectively) between time-lapse and conventional incubation systems. A significantly increased risk of PTB (adjusted OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.08-1.60) and LBW (adjusted OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.08-1.72) was found for singletons born after time-lapse incubation compared to singletons born after spontaneous conceptions. In addition, a lower risk for pregnancy hypertension (adjusted OR 0.72 95% CI 0.53-0.99) but no significant difference for preeclampsia (adjusted OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.68-1.12) was found compared to spontaneous conceptions. Subgroup analyses showed that some risks were related to the day of embryo transfer, with more adverse outcomes after blastocyst transfer in comparison to cleavage stage transfer.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is retrospective in design and different clinical strategies may have been used to select specific patient groups for time-lapse versus conventional incubation. The number of patients is limited and larger datasets are required to obtain more precise estimates and adjust for possible effect of additional embryo culture variables.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Embryo culture in time-lapse systems is not associated with major differences in perinatal and maternal outcomes, compared to conventional embryo culture, suggesting that this technology is an acceptable alternative for embryo incubation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was financed by a research grant from Gedeon Richter. There are no conflicts of interest for all authors to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Correlations between a deep learning-based algorithm for embryo evaluation with cleavage-stage cell numbers and fragmentation

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do cell numbers and degree of fragmentation in cleavage-stage embryos, assessed manually, correlate with evaluations made by deep learning algorithm model iDAScore v2.0?

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study (n = 5040 embryos; 1786 treatments) conducted at two Swedish assisted reproductive technology centres between 2016 and 2021. Fresh single embryo transfer was carried out on days 2 or 3 after fertilization. Embryo evaluation using iDAScore v2.0 was compared with manual assessment of numbers of cells and grade of fragmentation, analysed by video sequences.

RESULTS

Data from embryos transferred on days 2 and 3 showed that having three or fewer cells compared with four or fewer cells on day 2, and six or fewer cells versus seven to eight cells on day 3, correlated significantly with a difference in iDAScore (medians 2.4 versus 4.0 and 2.6 versus 4.6 respectively; both P < 0.001). The iDAScore for 0-10% fragmentation was significantly higher compared with the groups with higher fragmentation (P < 0.001). When combining cell numbers and fragmentation, iDAScore values decreased as fragmentation increased, regardless of cell number. iDAScore discriminated between embryos that resulted in live birth or no live birth (AUC of 0.627 and 0.607), compared with the morphological model (AUC of 0.618 and 0.585) for day 2 and day 3, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The iDAScore v2.0 values correlated significantly with cell numbers and fragmentation scored manually for cleavage-stage embryos on days 2 and 3. iDAScore had some predictive value for live birth, conditional that embryo selection was based on morphology.

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†

STUDY QUESTION

Which add-ons are safe and effective to be used in ART treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-two recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in the diagnosis of fertility problems, the IVF laboratory and clinical management of IVF treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The innovative nature of ART combined with the extremely high motivation of the patients has opened the door to the wide application of what has become known as 'add-ons' in reproductive medicine. These supplementary options are available to patients in addition to standard fertility procedures, typically incurring an additional cost. A diverse array of supplementary options is made available, encompassing tests, drugs, equipment, complementary or alternative therapies, laboratory procedures, and surgical interventions. These options share the common aim of stating to enhance pregnancy or live birth rates, mitigate the risk of miscarriage, or expedite the time to achieving pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

ESHRE aimed to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations focusing on the safety and efficacy of add-ons currently used in fertility procedures in order to improve the quality of care for patients with infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group consisting of practising clinicians, embryologists, and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of infertility. Patient representatives were included in the working group. To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, recommendations were based on the professional experience and consensus of the working group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 46 independent international reviewers. A total of 272 comments were received and incorporated where relevant.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary working group formulated 42 recommendations in three sections; diagnosis and diagnostic tests, laboratory tests and interventions, and clinical management.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 42 recommendations, none could be based on high-quality evidence and only four could be based on moderate-quality evidence, implicating that 95% of the recommendations are supported only by low-quality randomized controlled trials, observational data, professional experience, or consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of patients undergoing ART treatment for infertility. Their purpose is to promote safe and effective ART treatment, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. The guidelines aim to ensure that patients are fully informed about the various treatment options available to them and the likelihood of any additional treatment or test to improve the chance of achieving a live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESHRE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. K.L. reports speakers fees from Merck and was part of a research study by Vitrolife (unpaid). T.E. reports consulting fees from Gynemed, speakers fees from Gynemed and is part of the scientific advisory board of Hamilton Thorne. N.P.P. reports grants from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare, speakers fees from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare. S.R.H. declares being managing director of Fertility Europe, a not-for-profit organization receiving financial support from ESHRE. I.S. is a scientific advisor for and has stock options from Alife Health, is co-founder of IVFvision LTD (unpaid) and received speakers' fee from the 2023 ART Young Leader Prestige workshop in China. A.P. reports grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck A/S, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos and Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Theramex and Organon, travel fees from Gedeon Richter. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or bedeemedinclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.Theydo not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

SARS-CoV-2, fertility and assisted reproduction

BACKGROUND

In 2020, SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 pandemic had a huge impact on the access to and provision of ART treatments. Gradually, knowledge of the virus and its transmission has become available, allowing ART activities to resume. Still, questions on the impact of the virus on human gametes and fertility remain.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This article summarizes published data, aiming to clarify the impact of SARS-CoV-2 and the COVID-19 disease on human fertility and assisted reproduction, as well as the impact of vaccination, and from this, provide answers to questions that are relevant for people contemplating pregnancy and for health care professionals.

SEARCH METHODS

PUBMED/MEDLINE and the WHO COVID-19 database were searched from inception to 5 October 2022 with search terms focusing on 'SARS-CoV-2' and gametes, embryos, reproductive function, fertility and ART. Non-English studies and papers published prior to 2020 were excluded, as well as reviews and non-peer reviewed publications. Full papers were assessed for relevance and quality, where feasible.

OUTCOMES

From the 148 papers included, the following observations were made. The SARS-CoV-2-binding proteins, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) and type II transmembrane serine protease (TMPRSS2), are expressed in the testis, but co-expression remains to be proven. There is some evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the ejaculate of COVID-19 patients with severe disease, but not in those with mild/moderate disease. SARS-CoV-2 infection can impair spermatogenesis, but this seems to resolve after one spermatogenic cycle. Testosterone levels seem to be lower during and after COVID-19, but long-term data are lacking; disease severity may be associated with testosterone levels. COVID-19 cannot be considered a sexually transmitted disease. There is no co-expression of ACE2 and TMPRSS2 in the myometrium, uterus, ovaries or fallopian tubes. Oocytes seem to have the receptors and protease machinery to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection; however, viral RNA in oocytes has not been detected so far. Women contemplating pregnancy following COVID-19 may benefit from screening for thyroid dysfunction. There is a possible (transient) impact of COVID-19 on menstrual patterns. Embryos, and particularly late blastocysts, seem to have the machinery to be susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most studies have not reported a significant impact of COVID-19 on ovarian reserve, ovarian function or follicular fluid parameters. Previous asymptomatic or mild SARS-CoV-2 infection in females does not seem to negatively affect laboratory and clinical outcomes of ART. There are no data on the minimum required interval, if any, between COVID-19 recovery and ART. There is no evidence of a negative effect of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on semen parameters or spermatogenesis, ovarian function, ovarian reserve or folliculogenesis. A transient effect on the menstrual cycle has been documented. Despite concerns, cross reactivity between anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies and Syncytin-1, an essential protein in human implantation, is absent. There is no influence of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine on patients' performance during their immediate subsequent ART cycle. Pregnancy rates post-vaccination are similar to those in unvaccinated patients.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This review highlights existing knowledge on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 on fertility and assisted reproduction, but also identifies gaps and offers suggestions for future research. The knowledge presented should help to provide evidence-based advice for practitioners and couples contemplating pregnancy alike, facilitating informed decision-making in an environment of significant emotional turmoil.

[Developments within the IVF laboratory]

The area of assisted reproduction is continuing to develop at a rapid pace, especially within the laboratory. So called »time-lapse« photography, where embryos can be kept and assessed in a closed environment, has simplified the crucial handling of gametes and embryos as well as the logistics in the laboratory. Pregnancy and live birth rates have increased considerably since the start of IVF. This is to a large extent due to the implementation of prolonged embryo culture to the blastocyst stage, and to the introduction of vitrification, a cryopreservation technique which has greatly improved the survival rates of oocytes and blastocysts. The concept of single embryo transfer (SET) is being increasingly implemented around the world and has been shown to effectively decrease multiple birth rates, without compromising live birth rates.

O-104 Providing accurate information – impact of ancestry testing

Providing information to patients and, or donors at the ART clinic is essential but challenging, especially in the case of reproductive donation.

Recent developments in direct-to-consumer genetic testing combined with social media have increased the degree of difficulty. Concepts such as donor anonymity, secrecy and disclosure have to be revisited and totally re-thought as the anonymity of donors, their relatives and also of the children born through donation is no longer guaranteed.

This potentially has significant effects on everyone involved: to donors who donated under the assumption that their donation was completely anonymous, to recipients who were under the impression that they could keep donor conception a secret and to donor offspring who were unaware of their donor-assisted conception. It is also effectively retrospective affecting everyone who has, is or might participate.

Providing the correct information to donors, ART couples and donor-conceived offspring is the key, and advise for such information provision will be presented in line with the recently published ESHRE good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Trial registration number

P-793 The effect of Nuclear Receptor Subfamily 5 Group A Member 1 (NR5A1) in human ovarian somatic cell development

Study question

Can an inducible NR5A1 (encoding Steroidogenic Factor 1) cell line be used to study the functional role of NR5A1 in human female gonadal differentiation?

Summary answer

Conditional induction of NR5A1 in a human pluripotent stem cell (hPSC)-based model of gonadal differentiation allows us to study its effect on the differentiating cells.

What is known already

According to animal studies, NR5A1 is a critical factor in gonadal development. Previous research in our lab showed that CRISPR/Cas9 induced upregulation of NR5A1 during gonadal differentiation in male (XY) hPSCs increases expression of early Sertoli cell markers such as Inhibin A and Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and thus pushes the cells into a more mature gonadal cell type. However, the role of NR5A1 in female gonadal differentiation has yet to be determined.

Study design, size, duration

The female (XX) human embryonic stem cell (hESC) line, H9, was edited using CRISPR/Cas9 to conditionally induce NR5A1. These cells were subjected to a 10/20-day gonadal differentiation protocol where NR5A1 was induced through addition of Doxycycline (DOX) and Trimethoprim (TMP) from day 4 until day 10/20. Starting from day 4 technical duplicates/triplicates from every second day were subjected to qRT-PCR. Technical triplicates from day 4, 6, 8 and 10 were subjected to bulk RNA-sequencing.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

The cell line that was used in this project is a female hESC line, H9 (WiCell). A previously established protocol for gonadal differentiation (Sepponen et al., 2017) was followed wherein different cell culture media and matrices were supplemented with small molecules, inhibitors and growth factors. The CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing system was used to generate the NR5A1 inducible cell line. Cell characterisation was performed using qRT-PCR and bulk RNA sequencing (NovaSeq S4) methods.

Main results and the role of chance

qRT-PCR results showed that without NR5A1 induction there was almost no expression of this gene, but its expression increased drastically upon addition of DOX and TMP to the culture media. NR5A1 induction seemed to upregulate FOXL2 and WNT4, which are crucial genes for female gonadal differentiation, although the increase was not statistically significant. AMH showed a significant increase on day 8 of differentiation after NR5A1 induction. We also saw an increase in the expression of steroidogenic genes such as STAR, CYP11A1, CYP17A1 and CYP19A1 after NR5A1 induction. Subjecting the cells to NR5A1 induction for an additional 10 days resulted in the upregulation of bipotential gonadal markers GATA4, WT1 and EMX2 after NR5A1 induction. Similarly, the female gonadal markers RSPO1 and WNT4 were upregulated over time and WNT4 expression further increased upon NR5A1 induction.

NovaSeq S4 data showed that on day 8, after induction of NR5A1, genes related to reproductive system development and female pregnancy were upregulated. These included DHH, NR5A1, CYP19A1, AR, INHA and NR0B1. On day 10 genes related to reproductive system development such as FOXL2, NR5A1, INHA, LHCGR, and NR0B1 were also upregulated after NR5A1 induction.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The effect of NR5A1 induction on expression levels of bipotential gonadal markers GATA4, LHX9, WT1, EMX2 and female gonadal markers FOXL2, RSPO1, WNT4 was small in comparison to differentiation without additional NR5A1 induction. Moreover, we lack a protocol to generate bipotential gonadal cells expressing NR5A1 without inducing NR5A1 through CRISPR/Cas9.

Wider implications of the findings

Taken together the results will provide valuable insight and novel information on the function of NR5A1 in early female gonadal development and more in general on human ovarian development and sex determination. This knowledge will increase our understanding of pathological gonadal development, which often underlies disorders of sex development.

Trial registration number

Not applicable

OUP accepted manuscript

STUDY QUESTION

What information and support should be offered to donors, intended parents and donor-conceived people, in general and in consideration of the availability of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and matching services?

SUMMARY ANSWER

For donors, intended parents and donor-conceived offspring, recommendations are made that cover information needs and informed consent, psychosocial implications and disclosure.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Trends indicate that the use of donor-assisted conception is growing and guidance is needed to help these recipients/intended parents, the donors and offspring, navigate the rapidly changing environment in which donor-assisted conception takes place.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A working group (WG) collaborated on writing recommendations based, where available, on evidence collected from a literature search and expert opinion. Draft recommendations were published for stakeholder review and adapted where relevant based on the comments received.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Papers retrieved from PUBMED were included from 1 January 2014 up to 31 August 2020, focusing on studies published since direct-to-consumer genetic testing has become more widespread and accessible. The current paper is limited to reproductive donation performed in medically assisted reproduction (MAR) centres (and gamete banks): donation outside the medical context was not considered.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 32 recommendations were made for information provision and support to donors, 32 for intended parents and 27 for donor-conceived offspring requesting information/support.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The available evidence in the area of reproductive donation is limited and diverse with regards to the context and types of donation. General conclusions and recommendations are largely based on expert opinion and may need to be adapted in light of future research.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These recommendations provide guidance to MAR centres and gamete banks on good practice in information provision and support but should also be considered by regulatory bodies and policymakers at a national and international level to guide regulatory and legislative efforts towards the protection of donors and donor-conceived offspring.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The development of this good practice paper was funded by European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), covering expenses associated with the WG meetings, the literature searches and dissemination. The WG members did not receive any payment. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DISCLAIMER

This document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and where relevant based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.

The recommendations should be used for informational and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care, or be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care nor exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. They do not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, nor variations based on locality and facility type.

^†ESHRE pages content is not externally peer reviewed. The manuscript has been approved by the Executive Committee of ESHRE.

OUP accepted manuscript

STUDY QUESTION

Can use of a commercially available time-lapse algorithm for Day 5 blastocyst selection improve pregnancy rates compared with morphology alone?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The use of a time-lapse selection model to choose blastocysts for fresh single embryo transfer on Day 5 did not improve ongoing pregnancy rate compared to morphology alone.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Evidence from time-lapse monitoring suggests correlations between timing of key developmental events and embryo viability. No good quality evidence exists to support improved pregnancy rates following time-lapse selection.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial including 776 randomized patients was performed between 2018 and 2021. Patients with at least two good quality blastocysts on Day 5 were allocated by a computer randomization program in a proportion of 1:1 into either the control group, whereby single blastocysts were selected for transfer by morphology alone, or the intervention group whereby final selection was decided by a commercially available time-lapse model. The embryologists at the time of blastocyst morphological scoring were blinded to which study group the patients would be randomized, and the physician and patients were blind to which group they were allocated until after the primary outcome was known. The primary outcome was number of ongoing pregnancies in the two groups.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

From 10 Nordic IVF clinics, 776 patients with a minimum of two good quality blastocysts on Day 5 (D5) were randomized into one of the two study groups. A commercial time-lapse model decided the final selection of blastocysts for 387 patients in the intervention (time-lapse) group, and blastocysts with the highest morphological score were transferred for 389 patients in the control group. Only single embryo transfers in fresh cycles were performed.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In the full analysis set, the ongoing pregnancy rate for the time-lapse group was 47.4% (175/369) and 48.1% (181/376) in the control group. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups: mean difference −0.7% (95% CI −8.2, 6.7, P = 0.90). Pregnancy rate (60.2% versus 59.0%, mean difference 1.1%, 95% CI −6.2, 8.4, P = 0.81) and early pregnancy loss (21.2% versus 18.5%, mean difference 2.7%, 95% CI −5.2, 10.6, P = 0.55) were the same for the time-lapse and the control group. Subgroup analyses showed that patient and treatment characteristics did not significantly affect the commercial time-lapse model D5 performance. In the time-lapse group, the choice of best blastocyst changed on 42% of occasions (154/369, 95% CI 36.9, 47.2) after the algorithm was applied, and this rate was similar for most treatment clinics.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

During 2020, the patient recruitment rate slowed down at participating clinics owing to coronavirus disease-19 restrictions, so the target sample size was not achieved as planned and it was decided to stop the trial prematurely. The study only investigated embryo selection at the blastocyst stage on D5 in fresh IVF transfer cycles. In addition, only blastocysts of good morphological quality were considered for transfer, limiting the number of embryos for selection in both groups: also, it could be argued that this manual preselection of blastocysts limits the theoretical selection power of time-lapse, as well as restricting the results mainly to a good prognosis patient group. Most patients were aimed for blastocyst stage transfer when a minimum of five zygotes were available for extended culture. Finally, the primary clinical outcome evaluated was pregnancy to only 6–8 weeks.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The study suggests that time-lapse selection with a commercially available time-lapse model does not increase chance of ongoing pregnancy after single blastocyst transfer on Day 5 compared to morphology alone.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The study was financed by a grant from the Swedish state under the ALF-agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils (ALFGBG-723141). Vitrolife supported the study with embryo culture dishes and culture media. During the study period, T.H. changed his employment from Livio AB to Vitrolife AB. All other authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ClinicalTrials.gov registration number NCT03445923.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

26 February 2018.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT

11 June 2018.

Outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infected pregancies after medically assisted reproduction

STUDY QUESTION

What is the impact of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection on the outcome of a pregnancy after medically assisted reproduction (MAR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Our results suggest that MAR pregnancies are not differentially affected by SARS-CoV-2 infection compared to spontaneous pregnancies.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Information on the effects of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on pregnancy after MAR is scarce when women get infected during MAR or early pregnancy, even though such information is vital for informing women seeking pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Data from SARS-CoV-2 affected MAR pregnancies were collected between May 2020 and June 2021 through a voluntary data collection, organised by the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All ESHRE members were invited to participate to an online data collection for SARS-CoV-2-infected MAR pregnancies.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The dataset includes 80 cases from 32 countries, including 67 live births, 10 miscarriages, 2 stillbirths and 1 maternal death. An additional 25pregnancies were ongoing at the time of writing.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

An international data registry based on voluntary contribution can be subject to selective reporting with possible risks of over- or under-estimation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The current data can be used to guide clinical decisions in the care of women pregnant after MAR, in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

The authors acknowledge the support of ESHRE for the data registry and meetings. J.S.T. reports grants or contracts from Sigrid Juselius Foundation, EU and Helsinki University Hospital Funds, outside the scope of the current work. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

P–767 Cumulative live birth rate after IVF - trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification

Study question

Has cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) improved over time and which factors are associated with such an improvement?

Summary answer

During 2007–2017, CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly (27.0% to 36.3%), in parallel with an increase in blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation by vitrification.

What is known already

While it has been shown that live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) is higher for fresh blastocyst than for fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer, CLBR per oocyte aspiration, including one fresh ET and all subsequent frozen embryo transfers (FET), does not seem to differ between the two culture strategies.

Study design, size, duration

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: National register study including all oocyte aspirations performed in Sweden 2007–2017, n = 124 700. Donation cycles excluded.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Registry of Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF). CLBR was defined as the number of deliveries with at least one live birth resulting from one oocyte aspiration, including all fresh and/or frozen embryo transfers within one year. The delivery of a singleton, twin, or other multiples was registered as one delivery. Cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos was performed by slow freezing and of blastocyst by vitrification.

Main results and the role of chance

Overall, the CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly during the study period, from 27.0% to 36.3% (OR 1.039, 95% CI 1.035–1.043) and from 30.0% to 43.3% if at least one ET was performed (AOR 1.055, 95% CI 1.050–1.059). The increase in CLBR was independent of maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and number of previous IVF live births. The CLBR for women &lt;35 years and ≥ 35 years both increased significantly, following the same pattern. During the study period a substantially increasing number of blastocyst transfers were performed, both in fresh and in FET cycles. An important contributor included in the blastocyst strategy, may be the extended culture of the total cohort of embryos, also embryos earlier discarded at early cleavage stages, in order to reach the blastocyst stage. These embryos may contribute to the total number of available blastocysts and thereby increase the chance of a live birth within that oocyte aspiration cycle. Other important predicting factors for live birth, such as number of embryos transferred, could not explain the improvement, on the contrary the single embryo transfer (SET) rate increased with time.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The retrospective design implicates that other confounders of importance for CLBR can not be ruled out. In addition, some FET cycles might be performed later than one year post oocyte aspiration for the last year (2017) and are thus not included in this study.

Wider implications of the findings: The results suggest that blastocyst transfer, particularly when used in FET cycles and in combination with vitrification, is an important contributor to the improved live birth rates over time. This gives a possibility for fewer oocyte aspirations needed to achieve a live birth and a shortened time to live birth.

Trial registration number

-

P-767 Cumulative live birth rate after IVF - trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification

Study question

Has cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) improved over time and which factors are associated with such an improvement?

Summary answer

During 2007-2017, CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly (27.0 % to 36.3 %), in parallel with an increase in blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation by vitrification.

What is known already

While it has been shown that live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) is higher for fresh blastocyst than for fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer, CLBR per oocyte aspiration, including one fresh ET and all subsequent frozen embryo transfers (FET), does not seem to differ between the two culture strategies.

Study design, size, duration

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: National register study including all oocyte aspirations performed in Sweden 2007-2017, n = 124 700. Donation cycles excluded.

Participants/materials, setting, methods

Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Registry of Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF). CLBR was defined as the number of deliveries with at least one live birth resulting from one oocyte aspiration, including all fresh and/or frozen embryo transfers within one year. The delivery of a singleton, twin, or other multiples was registered as one delivery. Cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos was performed by slow freezing and of blastocyst by vitrification.

Main results and the role of chance

Overall, the CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly during the study period, from 27.0 % to 36.3 % (OR 1.039, 95% CI 1.035-1.043) and from 30.0 % to 43.3 % if at least one ET was performed (AOR 1.055, 95% CI 1.050-1.059). The increase in CLBR was independent of maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and number of previous IVF live births. The CLBR for women &lt; 35 years and ≥ 35 years both increased significantly, following the same pattern. During the study period a substantially increasing number of blastocyst transfers were performed, both in fresh and in FET cycles. An important contributor included in the blastocyst strategy, may be the extended culture of the total cohort of embryos, also embryos earlier discarded at early cleavage stages, in order to reach the blastocyst stage. These embryos may contribute to the total number of available blastocysts and thereby increase the chance of a live birth within that oocyte aspiration cycle. Other important predicting factors for live birth, such as number of embryos transferred, could not explain the improvement, on the contrary the single embryo transfer (SET) rate increased with time.

Limitations, reasons for caution

The retrospective design implicates that other confounders of importance for CLBR can not be ruled out. In addition, some FET cycles might be performed later than one year post oocyte aspiration for the last year (2017) and are thus not included in this study.

Wider implications of the findings

The results suggest that blastocyst transfer, particularly when used in FET cycles and in combination with vitrification, is an important contributor to the improved live birth rates over time. This gives a possibility for fewer oocyte aspirations needed to achieve a live birth and a shortened time to live birth.

Trial registration number

-

Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification

STUDY QUESTION

Has cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) improved over time and which factors are associated with such an improvement?

SUMMARY ANSWER

During an 11-year period, 2007–2017, CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly, from 27.0% to 36.3%, in parallel with an increase in blastocyst transfer and cryopreservation by vitrification.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

While it has been shown that live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transfer (ET) is higher for fresh blastocyst than for fresh cleavage stage embryo transfer, CLBR per oocyte aspiration, including one fresh ET and all subsequent frozen embryo transfers (FET), does not seem to differ between the two culture strategies.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A national register study including all oocyte aspirations performed in Sweden from 2007 to 2017 (n = 124 700 complete IVF treatment cycles) was carried out. Oocyte donation cycles were excluded.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data were retrieved from the Swedish National Registry of Assisted Reproduction (Q-IVF) on all oocyte aspirations during the study period where autologous oocytes were used. CLBR was defined as the proportion of deliveries with at least one live birth per oocyte aspiration, including all fresh and/or frozen embryo transfers within 1 year, until one delivery with a live birth or until all embryos were used, whichever occurred first. The delivery of a singleton, twin, or other multiples was registered as one delivery. Cryopreservation of cleavage stage embryos was performed by slow freezing and of blastocyst by vitrification.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In total, 124 700 oocyte aspirations were performed (in 61 313 women), with 65 304 aspirations in women <35 years and 59 396 in women ≥ 35 years, resulting in 38 403 deliveries with live born children. Overall, the CLBR per oocyte aspiration increased significantly during the study period, from 27.0% to 36.3% (odds ratio (OR) 1.039, 95% CI 1.035–1.043) and from 30.0% to 43.3% if at least one ET was performed (adjusted OR 1.055, 95% CI 1.050–1.059). The increase in CLBR was independent of maternal age, number of oocytes retrieved and number of previous IVF live births. The CLBR for women <35 and ≥35 years both increased significantly, following the same pattern. During the study period, a substantially increasing number of blastocyst transfers was performed, both in fresh and in FET cycles. Other important predicting factors for live birth, such as number of embryos transferred, could not explain the improvement. An increased single embryo transfer rate was observed with time.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The retrospective design implicates that other confounders of importance for CLBR cannot be ruled out. In addition, some FET cycles might be performed later than 1 year post oocyte aspiration for the last year (2017) and are, thus, not included in this study. In addition, no data on ‘dropouts’, i.e. patients that do not continue their treatment despite having cryopreserved embryos, are available, or if this drop-out rate has changed over time.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The results suggest that blastocyst transfer, particularly when used in FET cycles and in combination with vitrification, is an important contributor to the improved live birth rates over time. This gives a possibility for a lower number of oocyte aspirations needed to achieve a live birth and a shortened time to live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

The study was financed by grants from the Swedish state under the agreement between the Swedish government and the county councils, the ALF-agreement (ALFGBG-70940) and by Hjalmar Svensson’s research foundation. None of the authors declares any conflict of interest.

IVF and other ART in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic landscape analysis

BACKGROUND

Infertility affects 48.5 million couples worldwide with a prevalence estimated at 3.5-16.7% in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and as high as 30-40% in Sub-Saharan Africa. ART services are not accessible to the majority of these infertile couples due to the high cost of treatments in addition to cultural, religious and legal barriers. Infertility and childlessness, particularly in LMIC, have devastating consequences, which has resulted in considerable interest in developing affordable IVF procedures. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the safety, efficiency and ability to replicate techniques under different field conditions, and how to integrate more affordable ART options into existing infrastructures.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

This review was performed to investigate the current availability of IVF in LMIC and which other ART options are under development. This work will unfold the landscape of available and potential ART services in LMIC and is a key element in positioning infertility more broadly in the Global Public Health Agenda.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed of articles and gray literature on IVF and other ART options in LMIC published between January 2010 and January 2020. We selected studies on IVF and other ART treatments for infertile couples of reproductive age (18-44 years) from LMIC. The review was limited to articles published after 2010, based on the recent evolution in the field of ART practices in LMIC over the last decade. Citations from high-income countries, including data prior to 2010 and focusing on specialized ART procedures, were excluded. The literature search included PubMed, Popline, CINHAL, EMBASE and Global Index Medicus. No restrictions were applied with regard to study design or language. Two reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts, and extracted data. A search for gray literature was performed using the 'Google' search engine and specific databases (worldcat.org, greylit.org). In addition, the reference lists of included studies were assessed.

OUTCOMES

The search of the electronic databases yielded 3769 citations. After review of the titles and abstracts, 283 studies were included. The full texts were reviewed and a further 199 articles were excluded. The gray literature search yielded 586 citations, most of which were excluded after screening the title, and the remaining documents were excluded after full-text assessment due to duplicate entries, not from LMIC, not relevant or no access to the full document. Eighty-four citations were included as part of the review and separated into regions. The majority of the studies were observational and qualitative studies. In general, ART services are available and described in several LMIC, ranging from advanced techniques in China to basic introduction of IVF in some African countries. Efforts to provide affordable ART treatments are described in feasibility studies and efficacy studies; however, most citations were of low to very low quality. We found no studies from LMIC reporting the implementation of low-cost ART that is effective, accessible and affordable to most of those in need of the services.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The World Health Organization is in a unique position to provide much needed guidance for infertility management in LMIC. This review provides insight into the landscape of ART in LMIC in various regions worldwide, which will guide efforts to improve the availability, quality, accessibility and acceptability of biomedical infertility care, including ART in these countries.

Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus

PURPOSE

To explore how the assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories can be optimized and standardized to enhance embryo culture and selection, to bridge the gap between standard practice and the new concept of shortening time to healthy singleton birth.

METHODS

A Delphi consensus was conducted (January to July 2018) to assess how the ART laboratory could be optimized, in conjunction with existing guidelines, to reduce the time to a healthy singleton birth. Eight experts plus the coordinator discussed and refined statements proposed by the coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 29 participants (including the eight experts from step 1), who voted on their agreement/disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if ≥ 66% of participants agreed/disagreed with a statement. If consensus was not achieved for any statement, that statement was revised and the process repeated until consensus was achieved. Details of statements achieving consensus were communicated to the participants.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved for all 13 statements, which underlined the need for professional guidelines and standardization of lab processes to increase laboratory competency and quality. The most important points identified were the improvement of embryo culture and embryo assessment to shorten time to live birth through the availability of more high-quality embryos, priority selection of the most viable embryos and improved cryosurvival.

CONCLUSION

The efficiency of the ART laboratory can be improved through professional guidelines on standardized practices and optimized embryo culture environment, assessment, selection and cryopreservation methodologies, thereby reducing the time to a healthy singleton delivery.

The calm after the storm: re-starting ART treatments safely in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic created a significant impact on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) services. ESHRE decided to mobilize resources in order to collect, analyse, monitor, prepare and disseminate severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) knowledge specifically related to ART and early pregnancy. This article presents the impact of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic focusing on reproductive healthcare. It details the rationale behind the guidance prepared to support MAR services in organizing and managing the re-start of treatments or in case of any future wave of COVID-19 disease. The guidance includes information on patient selection and informed consent, staff and patient triage and testing, adaptation of ART services, treatment planning and code of conduct. The initiatives detailed in this article are not necessarily COVID-specific and such action plans could be applied effectively to manage similar emergency situations in different areas of medicine, in the future.

A picture of medically assisted reproduction activities during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe

STUDY QUESTION

How did coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) impact on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) services in Europe during the COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

MAR services, and hence treatments for infertile couples, were stopped in most European countries for a mean of 7 weeks.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

With the outbreak of COVID-19 in Europe, non-urgent medical care was reduced by local authorities to preserve health resources and maintain social distancing. Furthermore, ESHRE and other societies recommended to postpone ART pregnancies as of 14 March 2020.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A structured questionnaire was distributed in April among the ESHRE Committee of National Representatives, followed by further information collection through email.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The information was collected through the questionnaire and afterwards summarised and aligned with data from the European Centre for Disease Control on the number of COVID-19 cases per country.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

By aligning the data for each country with respective epidemiological data, we show a large variation in the time and the phase in the epidemic in the curve when MAR/ART treatments were suspended and restarted. Similarly, the duration of interruption varied. Fertility preservation treatments and patient supportive care for patients remained available during the pandemic.

LARGE SCALE DATA

N/A

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Data collection was prone to misinterpretation of the questions and replies, and required further follow-up to check the accuracy. Some representatives reported that they, themselves, were not always aware of the situation throughout the country or reported difficulties with providing single generalised replies, for instance when there were regional differences within their country.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The current article provides a basis for further research of the different strategies developed in response to the COVID-19 crisis. Such conclusions will be invaluable for health authorities and healthcare professionals with respect to future similar situations.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

There was no funding for the study, apart from technical support from ESHRE. The authors had no COI to disclose.

Comprehensive analysis of soluble RNAs in human embryo culture media and blastocoel fluid

PURPOSE

miRNAs have been suggested as biomarkers of embryo viability; however, findings from preliminary studies are divergent. Furthermore, the presence of other types of small RNA molecules remains to be investigated. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive analysis of small non-coding RNA levels in spent and unconditioned embryo culture media, along with miRNA levels in blastocoelic fluid samples from human embryos.

METHODS

miRNAs in unconditioned culture medium from 3 different manufacturers, along with miRNA from day 5 conditioned culture medium, control medium, and corresponding blastocoel fluid from 10 human blastocysts were analyzed with array-based q-PCR analysis. Subsequently, deep sequencing of total and small RNA in day 5 spent culture medium from 5 human blastocysts and corresponding controls was performed.

RESULTS

In spite of using state-of-the-art sensitive detection methods, no miRNAs were found to be reliably present in the spent culture medium or the blastocoel fluid. C_t values were above the recommended limit for detection in the array-based analysis, a finding that was confirmed by deep sequencing. The majority of miRNAs identified by deep sequencing were expressed in all samples including control media and seem to originate from sources other than conditioned IVF media.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings question the use of miRNAs as a reliable biomarker and highlight the need for a critical methodological approach in miRNA studies. Interestingly, tiRNA fragments appear to be overexpressed in conditioned IVF media samples and could potentially be a novel biomarker worthy of investigation.

ESHRE Clinical Embryologist certification: the first 10 years

STUDY QUESTION

What has the ESHRE programme ‘ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists’ achieved after 10 years?

SUMMARY ANSWER

The post-exam analysis showed a pass rate of 60% for Clinical and 50% for Senior Clinical Embryologists and a high level of internal consistency of all exams, leading to a total of 773 certified Clinical and 493 Senior Clinical Embryologists over the decade.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In an ESHRE survey on the educational and professional status of Clinical Embryology in Europe, it was found that education of laboratory personnel working in the field of assisted reproduction is highly variable between countries. In 2008, ESHRE introduced a programme, curriculum and certification in the field of Clinical Embryology. Knowledge gained by postgraduate study of recommended literature, following a clear curriculum, is verified by a written two-level exam for obtaining a certificate for Clinical (basic) or Senior Clinical (advanced) Embryologists. With a total of 1266 certificates awarded over a period of 10 years and recognition by the Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes and their Council for European Specialists Medical Assessment, the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams have become an internationally recognized educational standard in the field of Clinical Embryology.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A retrospective analysis of all applications for ESHRE Clinical (2009–2018) and Senior Clinical Embryologist Certification (2008–2018) and exam results of the first decade was carried out by the Steering Committee for Clinical Embryologist Certification.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

A total of 2894 applications for ESHRE Certification for Clinical Embryologists and the results of 10 exams for the Clinical (1478 candidates) and 11 exams for Senior Clinical (987 candidates) levels were analysed. A detailed post-exam retrospective analysis was performed regarding difficulty, discrimination and reliability levels of 1600 multiple-choice questions (MCQs) with a single best answer among four options, from eight different curriculum topics (Basic cell biology, Genetics, Developmental biology, Female reproduction, Male reproduction, IVF laboratory, Cryopreservation and Laboratory management), representing the core theoretical knowledge of Clinical Embryology. Difficulty levels of the MCQs were subsequently compared regarding each topic and each yearly exam. The participation and success rates in the ESHRE Clinical Embryology exams were also assessed in terms of the educational and geographic backgrounds of candidates.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Over the 10 years studied, the mean pass rate for the Clinical Embryologist exam was 60% (range 41–86%), and for the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam was 50% (range 34–81%). On average, 63% European candidates and 35% non-European candidates passed the Clinical Embryologist exam, while 52% European candidates and 31% non-European candidates passed the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The candidates’ educational level impacted on the success of the Clinical Embryologist exam but not of the Senior Clinical Embryologist exam. The mean difficulty indices by study topic showed that in the period of 10 years, there were no statistically significant differences between topics, for either the Clinical or Senior Clinical Embryologist exams. However, the overall exam difficulty varied between years. Reassuringly, the exam MCQ discrimination and reliability indices always showed a high level of internal consistency in all exams.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Some data from the initial ESHRE certification programme were not obtained electronically, in particular data for education, implying tables and figures reflect the specified valid data periods. Several countries exhibit different study profiles for those working in ART laboratories, such that laboratory technicians/technologists predominate in some countries, while in others only biologists and medical doctors are allowed to work with human embryos. Such differences could consequently affect the exam performance of candidates from specific countries.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

The ESHRE exams on Clinical Embryology are the most widely, internationally accepted tests of knowledge in the rapidly growing area of human reproduction. Clinical Embryology is increasingly recognized as a specific discipline for scientific staff who are collaborating closely with clinicians in managing human infertility through medically assisted reproduction. The analysis of the first 10 years of application of a two-level exam for Clinical Embryology shows a consistent high quality and reliability of the exam and MCQs used. These results represent an important follow-up of the quality of the ESHRE Certification programme for Clinical Embryologists, and convincingly position Clinical Embryology in the wider group of health disciplines that are harmonized through professional bodies such as ESHRE and European Board & College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. The exams provide a clear step towards the increasing professional recognition and establishment of Clinical Embryology within health systems at both European and international level.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

No competing interest. All costs of the Steering Committee meetings were covered by ESHRE.

Time-lapse technology for embryo culture and selection

Culturing of human embryos in optimal conditions is crucial for a successful in vitro fertilisation (IVF) programme. In addition, the capacity to assess and rank embryos correctly for quality will allow for transfer of the potentially 'best' embryo first, thereby shortening the time to pregnancy, although not improving cumulative pregnancy and live birth rates. It will also encourage and facilitate the implementation of single embryo transfers, thereby increasing safety for mother and offspring. Time-lapse technology introduces the concept of stable culture conditions, in connection with the possibility of continuous viewing and documenting of the embryo throughout development. However, so far, even when embryo quality scoring is based on large datasets, or when using the time-lapse technology, the morphokinetic scores are still mainly based on subjective and intermittent annotations of morphology and timings. Also, the construction of powerful algorithms for widespread use is hampered by large variations in culture conditions between individual IVF laboratories. New methodology, involving machine learning, where every image from the time-lapse documentation is analysed by a computer programme, looking for patterns that link to outcome, may in the future provide a more accurate and non-biased embryo selection.

Global and local visual processing in autism - a co-twin-control study

BACKGROUND

Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is associated with altered global and local visual processing. However, the nature of these alterations remains controversial, with contradictory findings and notions ranging from a reduced drive to integrate information into a coherent 'gestalt' ("weak central coherence" = WCC) to an enhanced perceptual functioning (EPF) in local processing.

METHODS

This study assessed the association between autism and global/local visual processing, using a large sample of monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) twins (N = 290, 48% females, age = 8-31 years). The Fragmented Pictures Test (FPT) assessed global processing, whereas local processing was estimated with the Embedded Figures Test (EFT) and the Block Design Test (BDT). Autism was assessed both categorically (clinical diagnosis), and dimensionally (autistic traits). Associations between visual tasks and autism were estimated both across the cohort and within-twin pairs where all factors shared between twins are implicitly controlled.

RESULTS

Clinical diagnosis and autistic traits predicted a need for more visual information for gestalt processing in the FPT across the cohort. For clinical diagnosis, this association remained within-pairs and at trend-level even within MZ twin pairs alone. ASD and higher autistic traits predicted lower EFT and BDT performance across the cohort, but these associations were lost within-pairs.

CONCLUSIONS

In line with the WCC account, our findings indicate an association between autism and reduced global visual processing in children, adolescents and young adults (but no evidence for EPF). Observing a similar association within MZ twins suggests a non-shared environmental contribution.

Social Cognition in Autism and Other Neurodevelopmental Disorders: A Co-twin Control Study

Alterations in social cognition (SC) are hypothesized to underlie social communication and interaction challenges in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The aetiological underpinnings driving this association remain unclear. We examined SC in 196 twins with ASD, other neurodevelopmental disorders or typical development using the naturalistic Movie for the Assessment of Social Cognition. Autism and its severity were assessed with the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-2, and autistic traits with the Social Responsiveness Scale-2. Using within twin-pair regression models, controlling for age, sex, IQ, and unmeasured familial confounders such as genetic background and shared-environment, SC correlated with ASD diagnosis, autism severity, and autistic traits. Our findings highlight the importance of SC alterations in autism and suggest a non-shared environmental impact on the association.

Biological optimization, the Goldilocks principle, and how much is lagom in the preimplantation embryo

The quiet embryo hypothesis postulates that early embryo viability is associated with a relatively low metabolism (Leese, 2002 BioEssays 24: 845-849). This proposal is re-visited here using retrospective and prospective data on the metabolic activity and kinetics of preimplantation development alongside the concept that an optimal range of such indices and of energetic efficiency influences embryogenesis. It is concluded that these considerations may be rationalized by proposing the existence of a "Goldilocks zone," or as it is known in Sweden, of lagom-meaning "just the right amount"-within which embryos with maximum developmental potential can be categorized. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 83: 748-754, 2016 © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications

Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.

Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications†‡

Two leading European professional societies, the European Society of Human Genetics and the European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology, have worked together since 2004 to evaluate the impact of fast research advances at the interface of assisted reproduction and genetics, including their application into clinical practice. In September 2016, the expert panel met for the third time. The topics discussed highlighted important issues covering the impacts of expanded carrier screening, direct-to-consumer genetic testing, voiding of the presumed anonymity of gamete donors by advanced genetic testing, advances in the research of genetic causes underlying male and female infertility, utilisation of massively-parallel sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing and non-invasive prenatal screening, mitochondrial replacement in human oocytes, and additionally, issues related to cross-generational epigenetic inheritance following IVF and germline genome editing. The resulting paper represents a consensus of both professional societies involved.

Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for 'add-on' interventions?

Globally, IVF patients are routinely offered and charged for a selection of adjunct treatments and tests or 'add-ons' that they are told may improve their chance of a live birth, despite there being no clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of the add-on. Any new IVF technology claiming to improve live birth rates (LBR) should, in most cases, first be tested in an appropriate animal model, then in clinical trials, to ensure safety, and finally in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to provide high-quality evidence that the procedure is safe and effective. Only then should the technique be considered as 'routine' and only when applied to the similar patient population as those studied in the RCT. Even then, further pediatric and long-term follow-up studies will need to be undertaken to examine the long-term safety of the procedure. Alarmingly, there are currently numerous examples where adjunct treatments are used in the absence of evidence-based medicine and often at an additional fee. In some cases, when RCTs have shown the technique to be ineffective, it is eventually withdrawn from the clinic. In this paper, we discuss some of the adjunct treatments currently being offered globally in IVF laboratories, including embryo glue and adherence compounds, sperm DNA fragmentation, time-lapse imaging, preimplantation genetic screening, mitochondria DNA load measurement and assisted hatching. We examine the evidence for their safety and efficacy in increasing LBRs. We conclude that robust studies are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of any adjunct treatment or test before they are offered routinely to IVF patients.

Time to take human embryo culture seriously

STUDY QUESTION

Is it important that end-users know the composition of human embryo culture media?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We argue that there is as strong case for full transparency concerning the composition of embryo culture media intended for human use.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Published data suggest that the composition of embryo culture media may influence the phenotype of the offspring.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

A review of the literature was carried out.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Data concerning the potential effects on embryo development of culture media were assessed and recommendations for users made.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The safety of ART procedures, especially with respect to the health of the offspring, is of major importance. There are reports from the literature indicating a possible effect of culture conditions, including culture media, on embryo and fetal development. Since the introduction of commercially available culture media, there has been a rapid development of different formulations, often not fully documented, disclosed or justified. There is now evidence that the environment the early embryo is exposed to can cause reprogramming of embryonic growth leading to alterations in fetal growth trajectory, birthweight, childhood growth and long-term disease including Type II diabetes and cardiovascular problems. The mechanism for this is likely to be epigenetic changes during the preimplantation period of development. In the present paper the ESHRE working group on culture media summarizes the present knowledge of potential effects on embryo development related to culture media, and makes recommendations.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

There is still a need for large prospective randomized trials to further elucidate the link between the composition of embryo culture media used and the phenotype of the offspring. We do not presently know if the phenotypic changes induced by in vitro embryo culture represent a problem for long-term health of the offspring.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Published data indicate that there is a strong case for demanding full transparency concerning the compositions of and the scientific rationale behind the composition of embryo culture media.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

This work was funded by The European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology. No competing interests to declare.

Conventional morphology performs better than morphokinetics for prediction of live birth after day 2 transfer

Numerous studies have reported on the potential value of time-lapse variables for prediction of embryo viability. However, these variables have not been evaluated in combination with conventional morphological grading and patient characteristics. The aim of this study was to assess the ability of patient characteristics and embryo morphology together with morphokinetic variables to predict live birth after day 2 transfer. This retrospective analysis included 207 transferred embryos from 199 couples cultured in a time-lapse system up to day 2 of development. Good prediction of live birth or ranking of embryos with respect to live birth potential was achieved with early cleavage combined with fragmentation grade at 43-45 h. These variables were selected as the strongest predictors of live birth, as assessed by stepwise logistic regression, and additional inclusion of morphokinetic variables did not improve the model significantly. Also, neither logistic regression models nor classification tree models with morphokinetic variables were able to achieve equally good prediction of live birth, as measured by AUC on an external data set not used for model development. In conclusion, for fresh day 2 transfers early cleavage in combination with fragmentation grade at 43-45 h should be considered when selecting between good quality embryos.

Quality control and standardization of embryo morphology scoring and viability markers

A so-called 'good-quality embryo' may be defined as an embryo that has the potential to implant into the uterine endometrium and give rise to the birth of a healthy child. A standardized and objective scoring of embryo 'quality' is therefore crucial in the classification and selection of embryos. However, embryo scoring is still being performed mainly via ocular evaluation, which often results in different interpretations of embryo quality. The addition of viability markers, such as measuring gene expression or the uptake/release of metabolites, proteins or RNA/DNA molecules in the culture media, would increase the possibility of standardized measurements. However, no single biomarker has yet been introduced into standard clinical practice, mainly due to the complexity of the techniques and the influence of biological variations and differences in culture conditions. In this paper different methods for the scoring of embryos and the possibility of standardizing and implementing quality control systems are discussed.

Pancreas transplantation with enteroanastomosis to native duodenum poses technical challenges--but offers improved endoscopic access for scheduled biopsies and therapeutic interventions

To facilitate endoscopic access for rejection surveillance and stenting of the pancreas, we have abandoned the duodenojejunostomy (DJ) in favor of duodenoduodenostomy (DD) in pancreas transplantation (PTx). From September 2012 to September 2013 we performed 40 PTx with DD; 20 solitary-PTx (S-PTx) and 20 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). We compared the outcomes with results from 40 PTx-DJ (10 S-PTx and 30 SPK) from the preceding era. The DD-enteroanastomoses were performed successfully. Endoscopic pancreas biopsies (endoscopic ultrasound examination [EUS]) yielded representative material in half of the cases. One exocrine fistula was treated by endoscopic stenting. PTxs-DD were associated with a higher rate of thrombosis compared to PTx-DJ (23% vs. 5%) and reoperations (48% vs. 30%), as well as inferior graft survival (80% vs. 88%). Time on waiting list, HLA A + B mismatches and reoperations were associated with graft loss. Only recipient age remained an independent predictor of patient death in multivariate analysis. PTx-DD showed a higher rate of thrombosis and inferior results, but facilitated a protocol biopsy program by EUS that was feasible and safe. Given that technical difficulties can be solved, the improved endoscopic access might confer long-term benefits, yet this remains to be proven.