Comprehensive chromosome screening improves embryo selection: a meta-analysis

Preconception carrier screening and preimplantation genetic testing in the infertility management

BACKGROUND

Genetic testing serves as a valuable element of reproductive care, applicable at various stages of the reproductive journey: (i) before pregnancy, when a couple's genetic reproductive risk can be evaluated; (ii) before embryo implantation, as part of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, to ascertain several inherited or de novo genetic/chromosomal diseases of the embryo before transfer; (iii) during the prenatal period, to assess the genetic costitution of the fetus. Preconception carrier screening (CS) is a genetic test typically performed on couples planning a pregnancy. The primary purpose of CS is to identify couples at-risk of conceiving a child affected by a severe genetic disorder with autosomal recessive or X-linked inheritance. Detection of high reproductive risk through CS allows prospective parents to be informed of their predisposition and improve reproductive decision-making. These include undergoing IVF with preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) or donor gametes, prenatal diagnosis, adoption, remaining childless, taking no actions. Both the presence of the affected gene (PGT-M) and chromosomal status (PGT-A) of the embryo can be comprehensively assessed through modern approaches.

OBJECTIVES

We provide a review of CS and PGT applications to equip healthcare providers with up-to-date information regarding their opportunities and complexities.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The use of CS and PGT is currently considered the most effective intervention for avoiding both an affected pregnancy whilst using autologous gametes in couples with known increased risk, and chromosomal abnormalities. As our understanding in the genetic component in pathological conditions increases, the number of tested disorders will expand, offering a more thorough assessment of one's genetic inheritance. Nevertheless, implementation and development in this field must be accompanied by scientific and ethical considerations to ensure this approach serves the best long-term interests of individuals and society, promoting justice and autonomy and preserving parenthood and the healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

The combination of CS and PGT aligns with principles of personalized medicine by offering reproductive care tailored to the individual's genetic makeup.

The ovarian stimulation regimen does not affect aneuploidy or blastocyst rate

RESEARCH QUESTION

Could the total dose (<3000 IU or ≥3000 IU) and type of exogenous gonadotrophin (i.e. recombinant FSH and/or human menopausal gonadotrophin [HMG]) influence aneuploidy and blastulation rates and produce different reproductive outcomes?

DESIGN

This retrospective, observational, multicentre cohort study included a total of 8466 patients undergoing IVF using autologous oocytes and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies. Participants were divided according to the dosage of total gonadotrophins and stratified by maternal age.

RESULTS

The aneuploidy rates, pregnancy outcomes and cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) were similar among women who received total gonadotrophin dosages of <3000 or ≥3000 IU. No statistical differences were reported in the blastulation rate with lower or higher gonadotrophin dosages. Women receiving a higher amount of HMG during ovarian stimulation had a lower aneuploidy rate (P = 0.02); when stratified according to age, younger women with a higher HMG dosage had lower aneuploidy rates (P< 0.001), while no statistical differences were observed in older women with higher or lower HMG dosages. No significant differences were observed in IVF outcomes or CLBR.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of gonadotrophins were not associated with rate of aneuploidy. However, an increased fraction of HMG in younger women was associated with a lower aneuploidy rate. The study demonstrated that the total gonadotrophin dosage did not influence aneuploidy, reproductive outcomes or CLBR. The increased gonadotrophin and HMG dosages used for ovarian stimulation did not precede aneuploidy, and the use of HMG should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, according to the individual's characteristics and infertility type.

Role of genetic analysis of products of conception and PGT in managing early pregnancy loss

This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.

Impact of aneuploidy on reproductive success in young infertile women: prospective analysis

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the clinical outcome of the first attempt at conception between two embryo selection methods, blastocyst morphology and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), chosen at the initial physician IVF consultation?

DESIGN

In this prospective analysis, a clinical decision regarding embryo selection, blastocyst morphology (group A) or PGT-A (group B) was made during initial physician IVF consultation. Female infertility patients were matched based on maternal age (mean 32.6 ± 3.6 years; range 25-43 years) and a similar time frame of oocyte retrieval. The primary outcome was live birth rate from the initial consultation to the first conception attempt for all female patients and for a subset analysis of patients aged <35 years.

RESULTS

The inclusion of PGT-A (group B) for embryo selection during the initial physician IVF consultation resulted in 23 additional women out of the total 100 achieving a healthy live birth following the first conception attempt in this maternally age-matched infertile population (group B = 72.0% versus group A = 49.0%; P = 0.0014). This same benefit was observed for age-matched, younger infertility patients (<35 years), with live birth rates from the initial consultation being significantly higher when the upfront clinical decision included PGT-A for embryo selection (group B = 76.7% versus group A = 53.4%; P = 0.0052). Interestingly, 17 women from group B would have received an aneuploid embryo transfer if selection had been determined by blastocyst morphology alone, as their best-grade embryo was aneuploid.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective analysis from the initial physician IVF consultation revealed that euploid embryo selection significantly improved live birth potential with the first conception attempt, even for younger women with infertility.

Which factors affect the live birth outcome of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations?

Objective

The objective of this study is to investigate the factors that influence the live birth rate (LBR) of the first single euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles after preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) in couples with balanced chromosomal translocations (BCT).

Design

Single center, retrospective and observational study.

Methods

A total of 336 PGT-SR and the first single euploid FBT cycles between July 2016 and December 2022 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the live birth outcomes. The parameters of the study population, controlled ovarian stimulation cycles, and FBT cycles were analyzed. Multivariable binary logistic regression was performed to find the factors that affected the LBR.

Results

The percentage of blastocysts at developmental stage Day 5 compared to Day 6 (51.8% vs. 30.8%; P<0.001) and with morphology ≥BB compared to

Conclusion

The developmental stage and morphology of blastocyst affect the live birth outcome of the first single euploid FBT in BCT carriers undergoing PGT-SR.

Collapse

Key Words

• balanced chromosomal translocations
• euploid
• frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer
• live birth
• preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR)

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Humans
• Female
• Pregnancy
• Retrospective Studies
• Live Birth
• Translocation, Genetic
• Adult
• Embryo Transfer/methods
• Male
• Cryopreservation
• Pregnancy Rate
• Preimplantation Diagnosis/methods
• Birth Rate
• Fertilization in Vitro/methods
• Pregnancy Outcome
• Blastocyst
• Ovulation Induction/methods

Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Ruixiao Zhang Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Yahui Hu Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Chenchen Cui Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Cuilian Zhang Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan Provincial People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Zhengzhou University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China Reproductive Medicine Center, Henan University People’s Hospital, Zhengzhou, China

Collapse

How should the best human embryo in vitro be? Current and future challenges for embryo selection

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) aims at overcoming the causes of infertility and lead to a healthy live birth. To maximize IVF efficiency, it is critical to identify and transfer the most competent embryo within a cohort produced by a couple during a cycle. Conventional static embryo morphological assessment involves sequential observations under a light microscope at specific timepoints. The introduction of time-lapse technology enhanced morphological evaluation via the continuous monitoring of embryo preimplantation in vitro development, thereby unveiling features otherwise undetectable via multiple static assessments. Although an association exists, blastocyst morphology poorly predicts chromosomal competence. In fact, the only reliable approach currently available to diagnose the embryonic karyotype is trophectoderm biopsy and comprehensive chromosome testing to assess non-mosaic aneuploidies, namely preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). Lately, the focus is shifting towards the fine-tuning of non-invasive technologies, such as "omic" analyses of waste products of IVF (e.g., spent culture media) and/or artificial intelligence-powered morphologic/morphodynamic evaluations. This review summarizes the main tools currently available to assess (or predict) embryo developmental, chromosomal, and reproductive competence, their strengths, the limitations, and the most probable future challenges.

Comparison of the efficacy of depot GnRH agonist protocol and the GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with repeated IVF failure: a retrospective cohort study

The aims of the research were (i) to compare the clinical outcome of IVF using follicular-phase depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist (depot agonist) protocol and GnRH antagonist protocol in patients with repeated IVF failure (RIF), (ii) to discover the optimal ovarian stimulation protocol for this group of low prognosis patients. 801 RIF patients with normal ovarian reserve receiving in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 492 patients were treated with the depot agonist protocol, and the remaining 309 patients with the antagonist protocol. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to find the predictor(s) of the chance of live birth. Higher live birth rate (LBR) and clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in fresh embryo transfer (ET) cycles were associated with the use of depot agonist compared with the antagonist protocols (44.81% vs. 27.27%, 54.64% vs. 34.93%, respectively; both p < 0.01) and depot agonist protocol was a strong predictor of live birth (OR = 2.182, 95% CI 1.355-3.514, p < 0.01). The CPR in thawed ET cycles was not significantly different between the two groups (38.12% vs. 45.26%, p > 0.05). A higher cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was achieved in the depot agonist group (46.59% vs. 35.21%, p < 0.01). Beneficial endometrial receptivity in the depot agonist protocol contributed to a higher LBR in fresh ET cycles, rendering this protocol the preferred option in the treatment of RIF patients.

Good practice recommendations on add-ons in reproductive medicine†

STUDY QUESTION

Which add-ons are safe and effective to be used in ART treatment?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Forty-two recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in the diagnosis of fertility problems, the IVF laboratory and clinical management of IVF treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The innovative nature of ART combined with the extremely high motivation of the patients has opened the door to the wide application of what has become known as 'add-ons' in reproductive medicine. These supplementary options are available to patients in addition to standard fertility procedures, typically incurring an additional cost. A diverse array of supplementary options is made available, encompassing tests, drugs, equipment, complementary or alternative therapies, laboratory procedures, and surgical interventions. These options share the common aim of stating to enhance pregnancy or live birth rates, mitigate the risk of miscarriage, or expedite the time to achieving pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

ESHRE aimed to develop clinically relevant and evidence-based recommendations focusing on the safety and efficacy of add-ons currently used in fertility procedures in order to improve the quality of care for patients with infertility.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

ESHRE appointed a European multidisciplinary working group consisting of practising clinicians, embryologists, and researchers who have demonstrated leadership and expertise in the care and research of infertility. Patient representatives were included in the working group. To ensure that the guidelines are evidence-based, the literature identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, recommendations were based on the professional experience and consensus of the working group. The guidelines are thus based on the best available evidence and expert agreement. Prior to publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 46 independent international reviewers. A total of 272 comments were received and incorporated where relevant.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The multidisciplinary working group formulated 42 recommendations in three sections; diagnosis and diagnostic tests, laboratory tests and interventions, and clinical management.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Of the 42 recommendations, none could be based on high-quality evidence and only four could be based on moderate-quality evidence, implicating that 95% of the recommendations are supported only by low-quality randomized controlled trials, observational data, professional experience, or consensus of the development group.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These guidelines offer valuable direction for healthcare professionals who are responsible for the care of patients undergoing ART treatment for infertility. Their purpose is to promote safe and effective ART treatment, enabling patients to make informed decisions based on realistic expectations. The guidelines aim to ensure that patients are fully informed about the various treatment options available to them and the likelihood of any additional treatment or test to improve the chance of achieving a live birth.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

All costs relating to the development process were covered from ESHRE funds. There was no external funding of the development process or manuscript production. K.L. reports speakers fees from Merck and was part of a research study by Vitrolife (unpaid). T.E. reports consulting fees from Gynemed, speakers fees from Gynemed and is part of the scientific advisory board of Hamilton Thorne. N.P.P. reports grants from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare, speakers fees from Merck Serono, Ferring Pharmaceutical, Theramex, Gedeon Richter, Organon, Roche, IBSA and Besins Healthcare. S.R.H. declares being managing director of Fertility Europe, a not-for-profit organization receiving financial support from ESHRE. I.S. is a scientific advisor for and has stock options from Alife Health, is co-founder of IVFvision LTD (unpaid) and received speakers' fee from the 2023 ART Young Leader Prestige workshop in China. A.P. reports grants from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Merck A/S, consulting fees from Preglem, Novo Nordisk, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Gedeon Richter, Cryos and Merck A/S, speakers fees from Gedeon Richter, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck A/S, Theramex and Organon, travel fees from Gedeon Richter. The other authors disclosed no conflicts of interest.

DISCLAIMER

This Good Practice Recommendations (GPRs) document represents the views of ESHRE, which are the result of consensus between the relevant ESHRE stakeholders and are based on the scientific evidence available at the time of preparation.ESHRE GPRs should be used for information and educational purposes. They should not be interpreted as setting a standard of care or bedeemedinclusive of all proper methods of care, or be exclusive of other methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results.Theydo not replace the need for application of clinical judgement to each individual presentation, or variations based on locality and facility type.Furthermore, ESHRE GPRs do not constitute or imply the endorsement, or favouring, of any of the included technologies by ESHRE.

Update on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and outcomes of embryos with mosaic results

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used as a frequent add-on for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to improve clinical outcomes. The purpose is to select a euploid embryo following chromosomal testing on embryo biopsies. The current practice includes comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technology applied on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. Despite its widespread use, PGT-A remains a controversial topic mainly because all of the RCTs comprised only good prognosis patients with 2 or more blastocysts available; hence the results are not generalizable to all groups of patients. Furthermore, with the introduction of the highly-sensitive platforms into clinical practice (i.e. next-generation sequencing [NGS]), a result consistent with intermediate copy number surfaced and is termed "Mosaic," consistent with a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells within the biopsy sample. The optimal disposition and management of embryos with mosaic results is still an open question, as many 'mosaics' generated healthy live births with no identifiable congenital anomalies. The present article provides a complete and comprehensive up-to-date review on PGT-A. It discusses in detail the findings of all the published RCTs on PGT-A with CCS, comments on the subject of "mosaicism" and its current management, and describes the latest technique of non-invasive PGT-A.

Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A normal chromosomal constitution defined through PGT-A assessing all chromosomes on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies represents the strongest predictor of embryo implantation. Yet, its positive predictive value is not higher than 50-60%. This gap of knowledge on the causes of euploid blastocysts' reproductive failure is known as 'the black box of implantation'.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

Several embryonic, maternal, paternal, clinical, and IVF laboratory features were scrutinized for their putative association with reproductive success or implantation failure of euploid blastocysts.

SEARCH METHODS

A systematic bibliographical search was conducted without temporal limits up to August 2021. The keywords were '(blastocyst OR day5 embryo OR day6 embryo OR day7 embryo) AND (euploid OR chromosomally normal OR preimplantation genetic testing) AND (implantation OR implantation failure OR miscarriage OR abortion OR live birth OR biochemical pregnancy OR recurrent implantation failure)'. Overall, 1608 items were identified and screened. We included all prospective or retrospective clinical studies and randomized-controlled-trials (RCTs) that assessed any feature associated with live-birth rates (LBR) and/or miscarriage rates (MR) among non-mosaic euploid blastocyst transfer after TE biopsy and PGT-A. In total, 41 reviews and 372 papers were selected, clustered according to a common focus, and thoroughly reviewed. The PRISMA guideline was followed, the PICO model was adopted, and ROBINS-I and ROB 2.0 scoring were used to assess putative bias. Bias across studies regarding the LBR was also assessed using visual inspection of funnel plots and the trim and fill method. Categorical data were combined with a pooled-OR. The random-effect model was used to conduct the meta-analysis. Between-study heterogeneity was addressed using I2. Whenever not suitable for the meta-analysis, the included studies were simply described for their results. The study protocol was registered at http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (registration number CRD42021275329).

OUTCOMES

We included 372 original papers (335 retrospective studies, 30 prospective studies and 7 RCTs) and 41 reviews. However, most of the studies were retrospective, or characterized by small sample sizes, thus prone to bias, which reduces the quality of the evidence to low or very low. Reduced inner cell mass (7 studies, OR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.27-0.52, I2 = 53%), or TE quality (9 studies, OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.67, I2 = 70%), overall blastocyst quality worse than Gardner's BB-grade (8 studies, OR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.24-0.67, I2 = 83%), developmental delay (18 studies, OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.49-0.63, I2 = 47%), and (by qualitative analysis) some morphodynamic abnormalities pinpointed through time-lapse microscopy (abnormal cleavage patterns, spontaneous blastocyst collapse, longer time of morula formation I, time of blastulation (tB), and duration of blastulation) were all associated with poorer reproductive outcomes. Slightly lower LBR, even in the context of PGT-A, was reported among women ≥38 years (7 studies, OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.75-1.00, I2 = 31%), while obesity was associated with both lower LBR (2 studies, OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.55-0.79, I2 = 0%) and higher MR (2 studies, OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.08-2.99, I2 = 52%). The experience of previous repeated implantation failures (RIF) was also associated with lower LBR (3 studies, OR: 0.72, 95% CI: 0.55-0.93, I2 = 0%). By qualitative analysis, among hormonal assessments, only abnormal progesterone levels prior to transfer were associated with LBR and MR after PGT-A. Among the clinical protocols used, vitrified-warmed embryo transfer was more effective than fresh transfer (2 studies, OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.05-2.33, I2 = 23%) after PGT-A. Lastly, multiple vitrification-warming cycles (2 studies, OR: 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22-0.77, I2 = 50%) or (by qualitative analysis) a high number of cells biopsied may slightly reduce the LBR, while simultaneous zona-pellucida opening and TE biopsy allowed better results than the Day 3 hatching-based protocol (3 studies, OR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.18-1.69, I2 = 0%).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

Embryo selection aims at shortening the time-to-pregnancy, while minimizing the reproductive risks. Knowing which features are associated with the reproductive competence of euploid blastocysts is therefore critical to define, implement, and validate safer and more efficient clinical workflows. Future research should be directed towards: (i) systematic investigations of the mechanisms involved in reproductive aging beyond de novo chromosomal abnormalities, and how lifestyle and nutrition may accelerate or exacerbate their consequences; (ii) improved evaluation of the uterine and blastocyst-endometrial dialogue, both of which represent black boxes themselves; (iii) standardization/automation of embryo assessment and IVF protocols; (iv) additional invasive or preferably non-invasive tools for embryo selection. Only by filling these gaps we may finally crack the riddle behind 'the black box of implantation'.

Comparison of clinical and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy outcomes between in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in sibling mature oocytes from high-risk patients: A retrospective study

AIM

To evaluate the influence of insemination methods on clinical outcomes by assessing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) outcomes in embryos obtained using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in sibling mature oocytes from high-risk patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 108 couples with nonmale or mild male factor infertility who underwent split insemination cycles from January 2018 to December 2021. PGT-A was performed using trophectoderm biopsy, array comparative genome hybridization, or next-generation sequencing with 24-chromosome screening.

RESULTS

Mature oocytes were divided into IVF (n = 660) and ICSI (n = 1028) groups. The normal fertilization incidence was similar between the groups (81.1% vs. 84.6%). The total number of blastocysts biopsied was significantly higher in the IVF group than in the ICSI group (59.3% vs. 52.6%; p = 0.018). However, euploidy (34.4% vs. 31.9%) and aneuploidy (63.4% vs. 66.2%) rates per biopsy and clinical pregnancy rates (60.0% vs. 58.8%) were similar between the groups. Implantation (45.6% vs. 50.8%) and live birth or ongoing pregnancy (52.0% vs 58.8%) rates were slightly higher in the ICSI group than in the IVF group and miscarriage rate per transfer was slightly higher in the IVF group than in the ICSI group (12.0% vs 5.9%); however no significant difference was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

IVF and ICSI using sibling mature oocytes had similar clinical outcomes, and euploidy and aneuploidy rates in couples with nonmale and mild male factor infertility. These results suggest that IVF is a useful option, along with ICSI, as an insemination method in PGT-A cycles, especially in high-risk patients.

[Interest of iDAScore (intelligent Data Analysis Score) for embryo selection in routine IVF laboratory practice: Results of a preliminary study]

INTRODUCTION

Embryo selection is a major challenge in ART, especially since the generalization of single embryo transfer, and its optimization could lead to the improvement of clinical results in IVF. Recently, several Artificial Intelligence (AI) models, based on deep-learning such as iDAScore, have been developed. These models, trained on time-lapse videos of embryos with known implantation data, can predict the probability of pregnancy for a given embryo, allowing automatization and standardization in embryo selection.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study, we have compared the hierarchical categorization of 311 D5 blastocysts of iDAScore v1.0 and the embryologists of our unit. These 311 D5 blastocysts have been classified as top (70.1%), good (Q+: 10.6%) and poor (Q-: 19.3%) quality by embryologists according to Gardner classification. Median iDAScores were [9.9-8.4],]8.4-7.5] and]7.5-2.1] for top, good and poor-quality blastocysts respectively.

RESULTS

We observed a significantly concordant categorization between iDAScore and embryologists for top, good and poor-quality blastocysts (respectively, 89.5, 36.4 and 48.3%, P < 10-4). Moreover, the hierarchical categorization of the three best blastocysts between iDAScore and the embryologists was as follow: 1st rank: 71.9%; 2nd rank: 61.6%; 3rd rank: 56.8% (P=0.07). One hundred and fifty-one blastocysts with known implantation data were analyzed. The iDAScore of blastocysts that implanted was significantly higher than those that did not implant (implantation+: 9.10±0.57; implantation-: 8.70±0.95, P=0.003).

CONCLUSION

This preliminary study shows that iDAScore is able to perform a reproducible, reliable and immediate hierarchical classification of blastocysts. Moreover, this tool can identify the blastocysts with the highest implantation potential. If these results confirmed on a larger scale of embryos and patients, IA could revolutionize IVF laboratories by standardizing embryo hierarchical selection.

Improving success rates by applying interventions in clinical practice and measuring their impact: A multicenter retrospective analysis of more than 240,000 cycles

BACKGROUND

Systematic monitoring of key performance indicators (KPI) is an important component of quality management within the IVF laboratory and, as success of assisted reproduction depends on many variables, it is important to examine how each variable can be optimized to achieve the best possible outcome for patients.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze how the design of a QMS impacts homogenization, safety, and efficacy in multiple fertility centers. Study Design Multicenter, retrospective cohort study with 188,251 patients who underwent 246,988 assisted reproductive treatments at 14 private centers belonging to IVI-RMA clinics between January 2005 and December 2019. Data were stratified by year, clinic, and patient group (standard patient cycles with no PGT-A, standard patients with PGT-A, and oocyte donation patients). Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with other known predictors were made to analyze the impact and the interactions of policies. Main outcomes were determined per clinic and summarized per year as the median of the rates of the clinics; each clinic had the same weight independent of the number of cycles.

RESULTS

Up to 188,251 patients were treated, for a total of 246,988 IVF cycles and 356,433 procedures. The introduction of standard operating procedures, trophectoderm biopsies, and blastocyst-stage transfers, coupled with an increased proportion of PGT-A cycles, led to improved outcomes while maximizing the number of single embryo transfers, driving a significant decrease in the number of multiple pregnancies while improving live birth rates. In terms of the live-birth rate per transfer, the interventions with greater impact over time in logistic regression analysis were 24-chromosome analysis and the introduction of benchtop incubators (odds ratio 1.92 [95% confidence interval 1.81 to 2.05]; p < 0.001). The odd ratios of the policies remained significant and very similar in the unadjusted and adjusted models.

CONCLUSIONS

The greatest impact on live-birth rate per cycle was obtained with a cumulative effect of all policies, especially in egg donation patients. In patients without PGT-A changing embryo culture conditions and blastocyst stage transfer had the greatest impact; in patients with PGT-A, trophectoderm biopsy. Standardizing procedures was essential in reducing variability among clinics and implementing changes.

The correlation between morphological parameters and the incidence of de novo chromosomal abnormalities in 3238 biopsied blastocysts

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between morphological parameters and the incidence of de novo chromosomal abnormalities.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 652 patients who underwent 921 cycles with 3238 blastocysts biopsied. The embryo grades were evaluated according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's system. The incidence of euploidy, whole chromosomal aneuploidy (W-aneuploidy), segmental chromosomal aneuploidy (S-aneuploidy), and mosaicism in trophectoderm (TE) cell biopsies was analyzed.

RESULTS

The euploidy decreased significantly with maternal age and was positively correlated biopsy day and morphological parameters. The W-aneuploidy increased significantly with maternal age and was negatively correlated biopsy day and morphological parameters. Parental age, TE biopsy day, and morphological parameters were not associated with S-aneuploidy and mosaicism, except that TE grade C blastocysts had significantly higher mosaicism than TE grade A blastocysts. Subanalysis in different female age groups showed that euploidy and W-aneuploidy had a significant correlation with TE biopsy day among women aged ≤ 30 y and 31-35 y, with expansion degree among women aged ≥ 36 y, with ICM grade among women aged ≥ 31 y, and with TE grade among all female age ranges.

CONCLUSION

Female age, embryo developmental speed and blastocyst morphological parameters are associated with euploidy and whole chromosomal aneuploidy. The predictive value of these factors varies across female age groups. Parental age, embryo developmental speed, expansion degree, and ICM grade are not associated with the incidence of segmental aneuploidy or mosaicism, but TE grade seemingly has a weak correlation with segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism in embryos.

Identifying parental and cell-division origins of aneuploidy in the human blastocyst

Preimplantation genetic testing commonly employs simplistic copy-number analyses to screen for aneuploidy in blastocyst trophectoderm biopsies. Interpreting intermediate copy number alone as evidence of mosaicism has led to suboptimal estimation of its prevalence. Because mosaicism originates from mitotic nondisjunction, utilizing SNP microarray technology to identify the cell-division origins of aneuploidy might provide a more accurate estimation of its prevalence. The present study develops and validates a method of determining the cell-division origin of aneuploidy in the human blastocyst by using both genotyping and copy-number data in parallel. The concordance of predicted origins with expected results was demonstrated in a series of truth models (99%-100%). This included determination of X chromosome origins from a subset of normal male embryos, determination of the origins of translocation chromosome-related imbalances via embryos from couples with structural rearrangements, and prediction of either mitotic or meiotic origins via multiple rebiopsies of embryos with aneuploidy. In a cohort of blastocysts with parental DNA (n = 2,277), 71% were euploid, 27% were meiotic aneuploid, and 2% were mitotic aneuploid, indicating a low frequency of bona fide mosaicism in the human blastocyst (mean maternal age: 34.4). Chromosome-specific trisomies in the blastocyst were also consistent with observations previously established in products of conception. The ability to accurately identify mitotic-origin aneuploidy in the blastocyst could benefit and better inform individuals whose IVF cycle results in all aneuploid embryos. Clinical trials with this methodology might also help provide a definitive answer regarding the reproductive potential of bona fide mosaic embryos.

Towards Automation in IVF: Pre-Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Embryo Grading System during PGT-A Cycles

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is arguably the most effective embryo selection strategy. Nevertheless, it requires greater workload, costs, and expertise. Therefore, a quest towards user-friendly, non-invasive strategies is ongoing. Although insufficient to replace PGT-A, embryo morphological evaluation is significantly associated with embryonic competence, but scarcely reproducible. Recently, artificial intelligence-powered analyses have been proposed to objectify and automate image evaluations. iDAScore v1.0 is a deep-learning model based on a 3D convolutional neural network trained on time-lapse videos from implanted and non-implanted blastocysts. It is a decision support system for ranking blastocysts without manual input. This retrospective, pre-clinical, external validation included 3604 blastocysts and 808 euploid transfers from 1232 cycles. All blastocysts were retrospectively assessed through the iDAScore v1.0; therefore, it did not influence embryologists' decision-making process. iDAScore v1.0 was significantly associated with embryo morphology and competence, although AUCs for euploidy and live-birth prediction were 0.60 and 0.66, respectively, which is rather comparable to embryologists' performance. Nevertheless, iDAScore v1.0 is objective and reproducible, while embryologists' evaluations are not. In a retrospective simulation, iDAScore v1.0 would have ranked euploid blastocysts as top quality in 63% of cases with one or more euploid and aneuploid blastocysts, and it would have questioned embryologists' ranking in 48% of cases with two or more euploid blastocysts and one or more live birth. Therefore, iDAScore v1.0 may objectify embryologists' evaluations, but randomized controlled trials are required to assess its clinical value.

Smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster presence does not affect embryo ploidy

PURPOSE

We examined the impacts of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum cluster (sERC) presence on embryonic development and blastocyst ploidy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent oocyte retrieval from January 2019 to November 2021 were included in the study. We classified the oocytes into three groups: normal oocytes in the sERC ( -) cycle, normal oocytes in the sERC ( +) cycle, and sERC ( +) oocytes. Next, the levels of serum estradiol, progesterone, anti-Mullerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, and human menopausal gonadotropin were compared between the groups. Moreover, fertilization, degeneration, and abnormal fertilization rates were compared between groups. To investigate developmental outcomes, the blastocyst and good-quality blastocyst rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection were compared. The quality of the transferred blastocysts was evaluated at follow-up. Additionally, embryos were submitted for next-generation sequencing analysis to examine the effect of sERC presence on ploidy.

RESULTS

The sERC ( +) group had significantly higher serum estradiol, serum progesterone, and serum anti-Mullerian hormone concentrations compared to those in the sERC ( -) group (P < 0.01). The abnormal fertilization rate was higher in the sERC ( +) cycle-sERC ( +) oocyte group (16.1%; 37/230) than in the sERC ( +) cycle-normal oocyte (6.2%; 63/971) and sERC ( -) cycle-normal oocyte groups (7.1%; 174/2467) (P < 0.01). After embryo transfer, nine women gave birth, and no confirmed congenital anomalies were observed. There was no significant difference in ploidy between the sERC ( +) and sERC ( -) groups.

CONCLUSION

The occurrence rates of embryos with euploidy were similar between the sERC ( +) and sERC ( -) groups.

We have reached a dead end for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy

The hypothesis of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) was first proposed 20 years ago, suggesting that during IVF elimination of aneuploid embryos prior to transfer will improve implantation rates of remaining embryos and, therefore, increase pregnancy and live birth rates, while also reducing miscarriages. Subsequently, unvalidated and increasingly unrestricted clinical utilization of PGT-A called for at least one properly randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess cumulative live birth rates following a single oocyte retrieval, utilizing all fresh and frozen embryos of an IVF cycle. Only recently two such RCTs were published, however both, when properly analysed, not only failed to demonstrate significant advantages from utilization of PGT-A, but actually demonstrated outcome deficits in comparison to non-use of PGT-A, when patient selection biases in favour of PGT-A were reversed. Moreover, because of high embryo mosaicism at the blastocyst stage and, therefore, high false-positive rates from trophectoderm biopsies, large numbers of chromosomal-normal embryos with normal pregnancy potential are unnecessarily left unused or discarded, indisputably causing harm to affected couples. We, therefore, strongly call for restricting PGT-A to only research protocols and, as of this point in time, encourage professional societies in the field to follow suit with appropriate practice guidelines.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy With Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Patients Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review the effect of comprehensive chromosome screening-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment, we conducted this meta-analysis to compare pregnancy outcomes of women who did and did not undergo such testing.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception until February 28, 2022, for randomized controlled trials focusing on PGT-A treatment without any language restrictions.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Randomized controlled trials involving women undergoing IVF with or without PGT-A and comprehensive chromosome testing. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for the primary outcome using a random-effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel method.

RESULTS

A total of nine trials with 3,334 participants were included. Overall, PGT-A was not associated with an increased live-birth rate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.96-1.34, I 2 =79%). However, PGT-A raised the live-birth rate in women of advanced maternal age (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.02-1.77, I 2 =50%) but not in women of nonadvanced age (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.89-0.99, I 2 =0%).

CONCLUSION

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy increases the live-birth rate in women of advanced maternal age.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42022311540.

The aneuploidy testing of blastocysts developing from 0PN and 1PN zygotes in conventional IVF through TE-biopsy PGT-A and minimally invasive PGT-A

Zygotes without a pronuclear (0PN) or with one pronuclear (1PN) were defined as abnormal fertilization in conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF). The removal of 0PN and 1PN zygotes from conventional IVF cycles has always been controversial. This study aimed to investigate the chromosomal aneuploidy rates of 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF cycles and to assess the concordance rate between TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A. TE biopsies and culture media with blastocoel fluid (CM-BF) samples were whole-genome amplified by multiple annealing and looping-based amplification cycle-based single-cell ChromInst method. Next generation sequencing was performed for comprehensive chromosomal screening on a NextSeq550 sequencer using the NextSeq 500/550 High Output kit v2. The aneuploidy rates of 0PN-derived blastocysts were 19.7% for TE-biopsy PGT-A, and 36.1% for miPGT-A; the concordance rate for ploidy was 77.0%; and the sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 75.5%, respectively. The aneuploidy rates of 1PN-derived blastocysts were 37.5% and 37.5% by TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A, respectively; the concordance rate between TE biopsies and CM-BF samples was 83.3%; and the sensitivity and specificity were 77.8% and 86.7%, respectively. Regarding TE-biopsy PGT-A, there were no significant differences in aneuploidy rates among 0PN-, 1PN- and 2PN-derived blastocysts (PGT-M cycles) (19.7% vs. 37.5% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.226), but the aneuploidy rate of 1PN-derived blastocysts was slightly higher than the other two groups. An increase in aneuploidy rates was observed for 0PN/1PN-derived day 6 blastocysts compared to 0PN/1PN-derived day 5 blastocysts (TE-biopsy PGT-A: 35.7% vs. 19.3%, P = 0.099; miPGT-A: 39.3% vs. 35.1%, P = 0.705). The present study is the first that contributes to understanding the chromosomal aneuploidies in 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF cycles using TE-biopsy PGT-A and miPGT-A. The clinical application value of 0PN- and 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF should be assessed using TE-biopsy PGT-A or miPGT-A due to the existence of chromosomal aneuploidies.. In terms of consistency, the miPGT-A using blastocoel fluid enriched culture medium is promising as an alternative to TE-biopsy PGT-A for aneuploidy testing of 0PN- or 1PN-derived blastocysts in conventional IVF.

Frequency of embryos appropriate for transfer following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease

PURPOSE

To identify specific likelihoods that an embryo will be classified as appropriate for transfer after preimplantation genetic testing for detection of a monogenic disorder (PGT-M), with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), separated by inheritance pattern.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 181 selected PGT-M cycles performed at CooperGenomics in 2018 or 2019. For each cycle, the following main outcome data was collected: the number of embryos classified as affected with monogenic disease, the number detected to be chromosomally abnormal, the number that were recombinant, the number that had no result, and if applicable, the number which were aneuploid.

RESULTS

There were significantly fewer embryos appropriate to consider for transfer when PGT-A was included for autosomal recessive and X-linked disorders. There were also fewer for autosomal dominant disorders, though this was not statistically significant. When PGT-A was not included, 45.8% of autosomal dominant, 69% of autosomal recessive, and 47.8% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. When PGT-A analysis was included, 29% of autosomal dominant, 41% of autosomal recessive, and 22% of X-linked embryos were appropriate to consider for transfer. 96.8% of women elect to include PGT-A when pursuing PGT-M.

CONCLUSION

This study resulted in specific likelihoods that an embryo would be found appropriate for clinicians and patients to consider for transfer based on the inheritance pattern of the monogenic disease being tested for and whether aneuploidy analysis was included.

Live birth after transfer of a single euploid vitrified-warmed blastocyst according to standard timing vs. timing as recommended by endometrial receptivity analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether endometrial receptivity analysis (ERA) improves live births in patients with and without a history of unsuccessful frozen embryo transfers (FETs).

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large reproductive center.

PATIENT(S)

Patients with and without ERA before euploid single FET were included in the analysis.

INTERVENTION(S)

Subjects in the exposed group underwent ERA and ERA-timed FETs. Subjects in the unexposed group followed a standard protocol FET without ERA. Outcomes were compared between nonreceptive and receptive subjects undergoing an ERA-timed FET and between ERA-timed vs. standard protocol FETs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The primary outcome was a live birth; secondary outcomes were biochemical and clinical pregnancy rates.

RESULT(S)

A total of 307 ERA-timed FETs and 2,284 standard protocol FETs were analyzed. One hundred twenty-five patients (40.7%) were ERA receptive, and 182 (59.3%) were ERA nonreceptive. After adjusting for the number of the previously failed FETs, there was no difference in the proportion of receptive and nonreceptive ERA results. There were no statistically significant differences in live births in patients with ERA-receptive vs. ERA-nonreceptive results (48.8% and 41.7%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 1.17; 95% CI, 0.97-1.40). There were no statistically significant differences in live births in patients with or without ERA testing results before FET (44.6% and 51.3%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio 0.87; 95% CI, 0.73-1.04).

CONCLUSION(S)

Patients with an increasing number of previous failed euploid FET cycles are not at an increased risk of a displaced window of implantation. Patients categorized as receptive vs. nonreceptive and those without ERA testing results have comparable FET success rates.

The effects of differences in trophectoderm biopsy techniques and the number of cells collected for biopsy on next‐generation sequencing results

Purpose

To examine how differences in trophectoderm biopsy techniques affect the frequency of mosaic embryos and sequencing results.

Methods

We examined differences in next‐generation sequencing (NGS) analysis results among operators or according to biopsy technique. Additionally, we determined the cut‐off for the number of collected cells to predict the occurrence of mosaicism. We collected cells according to the cut‐off value and examined whether there was a difference in the NGS analysis results between the pulling and flicking methods.

Results

There was no difference in the NGS analysis results among the operators. Regarding re‐biopsy, changes in the mosaic were observed in all specimens. The cut‐off value for the number of collected cells was five, and when more than five cells were collected, there was no difference in the NGS analysis results between the two methods.

Conclusions

We demonstrated that if trophectoderm biopsy techniques and NGS are stable, the cell collection location has a greater effect on NGS results than the biopsy technique.

State-Mandated Insurance Coverage and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in the United States

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between state-mandated insurance coverage for infertility treatment in the United States and the utilization of and indication for preimplantation genetic testing.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of 301,465 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology between 2014 and 2016. Binomial logistic regression was performed to examine associations between state-mandated insurance coverage and preimplantation genetic testing use. The neonate's sex from each patient's first successful cycle was used to calculate sex ratios. Sex ratios then were compared by state mandates and preimplantation genetic testing indication for elective sex selection.

RESULTS

The proportion of IVF cycles using preimplantation genetic testing increased from 17% in 2014 to 34% in 2016. This increase was driven largely by preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy testing. Preimplantation genetic testing was less likely to be performed in states with mandates for insurance coverage than in those without mandates (risk ratio [RR] 0.69, 95% CI 0.67-0.71, P<.001). Preimplantation genetic testing use for elective sex selection was also less likely to be performed in states with mandates (RR 0.44, 95% CI 0.36-0.53, P<.001). Among liveborn neonates, the male/female sex ratio was higher for IVF cycles with preimplantation genetic testing for any indication (115) than for those without preimplantation genetic testing (105) (P<.001), and the use of preimplantation genetic testing specifically for elective sex selection had a substantially higher (164) male/female sex ratio than preimplantation genetic testing for other indications (112) (P<.001).

CONCLUSION

The proportion of IVF cycles using preimplantation genetic testing in the United States is increasing and is highest in states where IVF is largely self-funded. Preimplantation genetic testing for nonmedical sex selection is also more common in states where IVF is self-funded and is more likely to result in male offspring. Continued surveillance of these trends is important, because these practices are controversial and could have implications for future population demographics.

The impact of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) on clinical outcomes in high risk patients

PURPOSE

To investigate whether preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improves the clinical outcome in patients with advanced maternal age (AMA), recurrent miscarriages (RM), and recurrent implantation failure (RIF).

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study from a single IVF center and a single genetics laboratory. One hundred seventy-six patients undergoing PGT-A were assigned to three groups: an AMA group, an RM group, and a RIF group. Two hundred seventy-nine patients that did not undergo PGT-A were used as controls and subgrouped similarly to the PGT-A cohort. For the PGT-A groups, trophectoderm biopsy was performed and array comparative genomic hybridization was used for PGT-A. Clinical outcomes were compared with the control groups.

RESULTS

In the RM group, we observed a significant decrease of early pregnancy loss rates in the PGT-A group (18.1% vs 75%) and a significant increase in live birth rate per transfer (50% vs 12.5%) and live birth rate per patient (36% vs 12.5%). In the RIF group, a statistically significant increase in the implantation rate per transfer (69.5% vs 33.3%) as well as the live birth rate per embryo transfer (47.8% vs 19%) was observed. In the AMA group, a statistically significant reduction in biochemical pregnancy loss was observed (3.7% vs 31.5%); however, live birth rates per embryo transfer and per patient were not significantly higher than the control group.

CONCLUSION

Our results agree with recently published studies, which suggest caution in the universal application of PGT-A in women with infertility. Instead, a more personalized approach by choosing the right candidates for PGT-A intervention should be followed.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A)-a single-center experience

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and nature of human embryonic aneuploidy based on the preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), the distribution of aneuploidy across the individual chromosomes, and their relationship to maternal age.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at a single center. The study includes subjects who opted for PGT-A in their in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle from 2016 to 2020. PGT-A was performed on 1501 embryos from 488 patients in 535 cycles. PGT-A was performed using NGS-based technique on Ion Torrent PGM (Life Technologies). Analysis was performed to determine the (i) frequency of the aneuploidy, (ii) the chromosome most commonly affected, (iii) relationship between maternal age and the rate of aneuploidy, and (iv) incidence of segmental aneuploidy.

RESULTS

The overall frequency of aneuploidy was observed to be 46.8%. The incidence of aneuploidy rate was ~ 28% at maternal age < 30 years which steadily increased to ~ 67% in women above 40 years. High frequency of aneuploidy was observed in chromosomes 16, 22, 21, and 15. Segmental abnormalities, involving loss or gain of chromosomal fragments, were observed at a frequency of 5.3%, and highest incidence of segmental gain was observed on the q-arm of chromosome 9.

CONCLUSION

The study provides important information regarding the frequency of the aneuploidy in IVF cohort and the most frequent chromosomal abnormality. The study further emphasizes the relationship between maternal age and aneuploidy. This study has important implications which help clinicians and genetic counselors in providing information in patient counseling.

A novel trophectoderm biopsy technique for all blastocyst stages

Purpose

This study was conducted to assess the effectiveness of a new trophectoderm (TE) biopsy method that does not require prior opening of the zona pellucida at the blastocyst stage.

Methods

TE biopsy was conducted using a modified extrusion method for embryos during the cleavage stage. In this method, culture medium was injected into the perivitelline space to help extrude TE cells from the zona pellucida before TE biopsy.

Results

Our extrusion method preserves the embryo culture environment until immediately before biopsy because it does not require opening of the zona pellucida prior to TE biopsy. Furthermore, this method does not require a waiting time for blastocyst hatching after laser irradiation, thereby minimizing damage to the embryos and maintaining the time schedule of culture operations.

Conclusions

TE biopsy using this novel extrusion method may be useful in various applications, including the collection of TE cells for next-generation sequencing analysis.

First Baby Born in Brazil after Simultaneous Diagnosis through Non-Invasive and Conventional PGT-A

Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (niPGT-A) aiming to assess cell-free embryonic DNA in spent culture media is promising, especially because it might overcome the diminished rates of implantation caused by the inadequate performance of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Our center is part of the largest study to date assessing the concordance between conventional PGT-A and niPGT-A, and we report here the delivery of the first baby born in Brazil using niPGT-A. The parents of the baby were admitted to our center in 2018. They did not present history of infertility, and they were interested in using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and PGT-A in order to avoid congenital anomalies in the offspring. A total of 11 (3 day-5 and 8 day-6) expanded blastocysts were biopsied, and the spent culture media (culture from day-4 to day-6) from 8 day-6 blastocysts were collected for niPGT-A. Overall, 7 embryos yielded informative results for trophectoderm (TE) and media samples. Among the embryos with informative results, 5 presented concordant diagnosis between conventional PGT-A and niPGT-A, and 2 presented discordant diagnosis (1 false-positive and one false-negative). The Blastocyst 4, diagnosed as 46, XY by both niPGT-A and conventional PGT-A, was warmed up and transferred, resulting in the birth of a healthy 3.8 kg boy in February 2020. Based on our results and the recent literature, we believe that the safest current application of niPGT-A would be as a method of embryo selection for patients without an indication for conventional PGT-A. The approximate 80% of reliability of niPGT-A in the diagnosis of ploidy is superior to predictions provided by other non-invasive approaches like morphology and morphokinetics selection.

Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016-2018

Purpose

To examine the live birth and other outcomes reported with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in the United Kingdom (UK) Human Embryology and Fertilization Authority (HFEA) data collection.

Methods

A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted following freedom of information (FoI) requests to the HFEA for the PGT-A and non-PGT-A cycle outcomes for 2016–2018. Statistical analysis of differences between PGT-A and non-PGT-A cycles was performed. Other than grouping by maternal age, no further confounders were controlled for; fresh and frozen transfers were included.

Results

Outcomes collected between 2016 and 2018 included total number of cycles, cycles with no embryo transfer, total number of embryos transferred, live birth rate (LBR) per embryo transferred and live birth rate per treatment cycle. Data was available for 2464 PGT-A out of a total 190,010 cycles. LBR per embryo transferred and LBR per treatment cycle (including cycles with no transfer) were significantly higher for all PGT-A vs non-PGT-A age groups (including under 35), with nearly all single embryo transfers (SET) after PGT-A (significantly more in non-PGT-A) and a reduced number of transfers per live birth particularly for cycles with maternal age over 40 years.

Conclusion

The retrospective study provides strong evidence for the benefits of PGT-A in terms of live births per embryo transferred and per cycle started but is limited in terms of matching PGT-A and non-PGT-A cohorts (e.g. in future studies, other confounders could be controlled for). This data challenges the HFEA “red traffic light” guidance that states there is “no evidence that PGT-A is effective or safe” and hence suggests the statement be revisited in the light of this and other new data.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-021-02349-0.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies does not increase success rates in fresh oocyte donation cycles: a paired cohort study

PURPOSE

To determine whether in vitro fertilization cycles using fresh oocyte donations benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies.

METHODS

A paired cohort study compared 44 fresh oocyte donation cycles with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). The sibling oocyte study analyzed fertilized oocytes, blastocyst development, and euploidy rate. Only frozen embryo transfers were performed. Pregnancy, implantation, biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage, stillbirth, live birth, and twin pregnancy rates were analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

Fresh oocyte donation cycles between PGT-A and non-PGT-A groups were similar in all laboratory and clinical outcomes. A euploidy rate of 74.2% was observed in the PGT-A group. Although a slight trend was observed for implantation rate in the PGT-A group, it was not statistically significant. No difference was observed for live birth between groups.

CONCLUSION

PGT-A associated with fresh oocyte donation cycles does not improve clinical outcomes and can be seen as over-treatment for patients.

Evaluation of artificial intelligence using time-lapse images of IVF embryos to predict live birth

RESEARCH QUESTION

Can artificial intelligence (AI) improve the prediction of live births based on embryo images?

DESIGN

The AI system was created by using the Attention Branch Network associated with deep learning to predict the probability of live birth from 141,444 images recorded by time-lapse imaging of 470 transferred embryos, of which 91 resulted in live birth and 379 resulted in non-live birth that included implantation failure, biochemical pregnancy and clinical miscarriage. The possibility that the calculated confidence scores of each embryo and the focused areas visualized in each embryo image can help predict subsequent live birth was examined.

RESULTS

The AI system for the first time successfully visualized embryo features in focused areas that had potential to distinguish between live and non-live births. No visual feature of embryos were visualized that were associated with live or non-live births, although there were many images in which high-focused areas existed around the zona pellucida. When a cut-off level for the confidence score was set at 0.341, the live birth rate was significantly greater for embryos with a score higher than the cut-off level than for those with a score lower than the cut-off level (P < 0.001). In addition, the live birth rate of embryos with good morphological quality and confidence scores higher than 0.341 was 41.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors have created an AI system with a confidence score that is useful for non-invasive selection of embryos that could result in live birth. Further study is necessary to improve selection accuracy.

Uterine Transplantation: Review of Livebirths and Reproductive Implications

Uterine transplantation (UTx) is a fertility restoring treatment for women with absolute uterine factor infertility. At a time when there is no question of the procedure's feasibility, and as the number of livebirths begins to increase exponentially, various important reproductive, fetal, and maternal medicine implications have emerged. Detailed outcomes from 17 livebirths following UTx are now available, which are reviewed herein, along with contextualized extrapolation from pregnancy outcomes in other solid organ transplants. Differences in recipient demographics and reproductive aspirations between UTx and other transplant recipients make extrapolating management strategies and outcomes in other solid organ transplants inappropriate. Whereas preterm delivery remains prominent, small for gestational age or hypertensive disorders do not appear to be as prevalent following UTx when compared to other solid organ transplants. Given the primary objective of undertaking UTx is to achieve a livebirth, publication of reproductive outcomes is essential at this early stage, to reflect on and optimize the management of future cases.

Pregnancy outcomes following in vitro fertilization frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET) with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL): a SART-CORS study

STUDY QUESTION

Can preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) improve the live birth rate in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

PGT-A use was associated with improved live birth rates in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing frozen embryo transfer (IVF-FET).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Euploid embryo transfer is thought to optimize outcomes in some couples with infertility. There is insufficient evidence, however, supporting this approach to management of recurrent pregnancy loss.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study included data collected by the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System (SART-CORS) for IVF-FET cycles between years 2010 through 2016. A total of 12 631 FET cycles in 10 060 couples were included in this analysis designed to assess the utility of PGT-A in couples with RPL undergoing FET, including 4287 cycles in couples with tubal disease who formed a control group.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The experimental group included couples with RPL (strictly defined as a history of 3 or more pregnancy losses) undergoing FET with or without PGT-A. The primary outcome was live birth rate. Secondary outcomes included rates of clinical pregnancy, spontaneous abortion, and biochemical pregnancy loss. Differences were analyzed using generalized estimating equations logistic regression models to account for multiple cycles per patient. Covariates included in the model were age, gravidity, geographic region, race/ethnicity, smoking history, and indication for assisted reproductive technologies. Analyses were stratified for age groups as defined by SART: <35 years, 35-37 years, 38-40 years, 41-42 years, and >42 years.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

In women with a diagnosis of RPL, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) comparing IVF-FET with PGT-A versus without PGT-A for live birth outcome was 1.31 (95% CI: 1.12, 1.52) for age <35 years, 1.45 (95% CI: 1.21, 1.75) for ages 35-37 years, 1.89 (95% CI: 1.56, 2.29) for ages 38-40, 2.62 (95% CI: 1.94-3.53) for ages 41-42, and 3.80 (95% CI: 2.52, 5.72) for ages >42 years. For clinical pregnancy, the OR was 1.26 (95% CI: 1.08, 1.48) for age <35 years, 1.37 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.64) for ages 35-37 years, 1.68 (95% CI: 1.40, 2.03) for ages 38-40 years, 2.19 (95% CI: 1.65, 2.90) for ages 41-42, and 2.31 (95% CI: 1.60, 3.32) for ages >42 years. Finally, for spontaneous abortion, the OR was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.21) for age <35 years, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.65, 1.11) for ages 35-37 years, 0.81 (95% CI: 0.60, 1.08) for ages 38-40, 0.86 (95% CI: 0.58, 1.27) for ages 41-42, and 0.58 (95% CI: 0.32, 1.07) for ages >42 years.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The retrospective collection of data including only women with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing FET presents a limitation of this study, and results may not be generalizable to all couples with recurrent pregnancy loss. Also, data regarding evaluation and treatment for RPL for the included women is unavailable.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the largest study to date assessing the utility of PGT-A in women with RPL. PGT-A was associated with improvement in live birth and clinical pregnancy in women with RPL, with the largest difference noted in the group of women with age greater than 42 years. Couples with RPL warrant counseling on all management options to reduce subsequent miscarriage, which may include IVF with PGT-A for euploid embryo selection.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy in Patients Who Have Had Multiple Miscarriages: A Review of Current Literature

Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) is an obstetrical complication that affects about 3% of reproductive age couples. Genetic and non-genetic causes of RPL are multiple; however, aneuploidy is the most common obstetrical complication that can explain single and recurrent pregnancy loss (present in about 60% of recognized clinical pregnancies which result in a miscarriage). Parental karyotyping will only be of potential benefit for 2 to 5 percentage of RPL couples who are translocation carriers. Products of conception (POC) karyotype analysis has been used to direct management in RPL and has been shown to be cost-effective, but the technique has many limitations including high culture failure rate and maternal cell contamination. These limitations can be significantly reduced using POC chromosomal microarray (CMA) technology. We believe that POC genetic testing should be performed after the second and subsequent pregnancy loss using CMA. Although the results will not generally alter the course of treatment, the knowledge of the reason for the loss is of great emotional comfort to many patients. In addition, POC CMA performed in conjunction with a regular complete maternal RPL work-up will identify the group of truly unexplained RPL. Thus, only 10% of patients with RPL will complete an evaluation having a euploid loss and an otherwise normal work-up. This group of "truly unexplained RPL" would be ideal for new research trials and therapies. Pre-implantation genetic testing (PGT) technology has improved recently with day 5 trophectoderm biopsy as compared to biopsy on day 3 as well as with the addition of CMA and next-generation sequencing technologies. The most recent studies on PGT-SR (PGT-Structural rearrangement) show improved clinical and live birth rates per pregnancy, as well as decreased miscarriage rate for translocation carriers. PGT-A (PGT-aneuploidy) may have a limited role in RPL in cases with documented recurrent POC aneuploidy.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review of the Evidence

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was developed as an invasive embryo-selection technique and is extensively used in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles. Around 95,000 preimplantation genetic testing cycles were carried out in the United States between 2014 and 2016, the majority of which were performed for aneuploidy. The objective of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is to select for transfer a euploid embryo, after embryo biopsy and cytogenetic analysis. The current technique consists of applying comprehensive chromosome screening on trophectoderm cells after blastocyst-stage embryo biopsy. This article reviews all the published randomized controlled trials on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy with comprehensive chromosome screening and comments on the subject of embryo mosaicism detected by this technique. Most of these trials have been criticized because they only included good prognosis patients having normal ovarian reserve producing a high number of embryos available for biopsy. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy does not improve ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle started when routinely applied on the general IVF population but seems to be a good tool of embryo selection for a selected category of patients with normal ovarian reserve, yet should be only practiced by experienced IVF clinics. If no euploid embryo is available after preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, a low-level mosaic embryo can be considered and prioritized for transfer after appropriate genetic counseling.

The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in the United States: an analysis of cost and birth outcomes from 158,665 in vitro fertilization cycles

BACKGROUND

A controversial and unresolved question in reproductive medicine is the utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization. Infertility is prevalent, but its treatment is notoriously expensive and typically not covered by insurance. Therefore, cost-effectiveness is critical to consider in this context.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for the treatment of infertility in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

As reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System, a national data registry, in vitro fertilization cycles occurring between 2014 and 2016 in the United States were analyzed. A probabilistic decision tree was developed using empirical outputs to simulate the events and outcomes associated with in vitro fertilization with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. The treatment strategies were (1) in vitro fertilization with intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and (2) in vitro fertilization with transfers of untested embryos. Patients progressed through the treatment model until they achieved a live birth or 12 months after ovarian stimulation. Clinical costs related to both treatment strategies were extracted from the literature and considered from both the patient and payer perspectives. Outcome metrics included incremental cost (measured in 2018 US dollars), live birth outcomes, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, and incremental cost per live birth between treatment strategies.

RESULTS

The study population included 114,157 first fresh in vitro fertilization stimulations and 44,508 linked frozen embryo transfer cycles. Of the fresh stimulations, 16.2% intended preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and 83.8% did not. In patients younger than 35 years old, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy was associated with worse clinical outcomes and higher costs. At age 35 years and older, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy led to more cumulative births but was associated with higher costs from both perspectives. From a patient perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored the no preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy strategy from the <35 years age group to the 38 years age group and beginning at age 39 years favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. From a payer perspective, the incremental cost per live birth favored preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy regardless of patient age.

CONCLUSION

The cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is dependent on patient age and perspective. From an economic perspective, routine preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should not be universally adopted; however, it may be cost-effective in certain scenarios.

Trophectoderm biopsy of blastocysts for a preimplantation genetic test does not affect serum β-hCG levels in early pregnancy: a study using propensity score matching

Background

Although preimplantation genetic test (PGT) has been used worldwide, few studies investigated the effect of trophectoderm biopsy of blastocysts on early embryo development. This study aimed to investigate whether trophectoderm (TE) biopsy of blastocysts for a PGT affected serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels 14 days after transfer.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. The study population comprised pregnant women undergoing the transfer of single vitrified-warmed blastocysts after PGT between January 1, 2018, and July 30, 2020. The control group had non-PGT cycles with other inclusion criteria identical to those for the study group. Propensity score matching was used to screen a group of patients so that the baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. Serum β-hCG levels were compared between the PGT and non-PGT cycles. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influence of PGT on serum β-hCG levels, while receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC curves) were plotted to predict pregnancy outcomes using serum β-hCG levels.

Results

Serum β-hCG levels were comparable between the PGT and non-PGT patients: live birth: 2503 ± 1702 mIU/mL vs 2266 ± 1289 mIU/mL (P = 0.219); clinical pregnancy: 2261 ± 1564 mIU/mL vs 2148 ± 1348 mIU/mL (P = 0.461); and ongoing pregnancy: 2412 ± 1589 mIU/mL vs 2278 ± 1308 mIU/mL (P = 0.422). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated no impact of PGT on the serum β-hCG level (standardized coefficient = − 0.001, P = 0.989). For clinical pregnancy, the cutoff value was 482 mIU/mL and 302 mIU/mL for PGT and non-PGT patients, respectively. The threshold to predict live birth was 1345 mIU/mL and 1621 mIU/mL in the PGT and non-PGT cycles, respectively.

Conclusion

Trophectoderm biopsy of blastocysts for PGT did not affect the serum β-hCG level 14 days after transfer.

The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study

STUDY QUESTION

Are the reproductive outcomes (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) different between follicular phase stimulation (FPS)- and luteal phase stimulation (LPS)-derived euploid blastocysts?

SUMMARY ANSWER

No difference was observed between FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts after vitrified-warmed single embryo transfer (SET).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Technical improvements in IVF allow the implementation non-conventional controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) protocols for oncologic and poor prognosis patients. One of these protocols begins LPS 5 days after FPS is ended (DuoStim). Although, several studies have reported similar embryological outcomes (e.g. fertilization, blastulation, euploidy) between FPS- and LPS-derived cohort of oocytes, information on the reproductive (clinical, obstetric and perinatal) outcomes of LPS-derived blastocysts is limited to small and retrospective studies.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Multicenter study conducted between October 2015 and March 2019 including all vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfers after DuoStim. Only first transfers of good quality blastocysts (≥BB according to Gardner and Schoolcraft's classification) were included. If euploid blastocysts obtained after both FPS and LPS were available the embryo to transfer was chosen blindly. The primary outcome was the live birth rate (LBR) per vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer in the two groups. To achieve 80% power (α = 0.05) to rule-out a 15% difference in the LBR, a total of 366 first transfers were required. Every other clinical, as well as obstetric and perinatal outcomes, were recorded.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Throughout the study period, 827 patients concluded a DuoStim cycle and among them, 339 did not identify any transferable blastocyst, 145 had an euploid blastocyst after FPS, 186 after LPS and 157 after both FPS and LPS. Fifty transfers of poor quality euploid blastocysts were excluded and 49 patients did not undergo an embryo transfer during the study period. Thus, 389 patients had a vitrified-warmed SET of a good quality euploid blastocyst (182 after FPS and 207 after LPS). For 126 cases (32%) where both FPS- and LPS-derived good quality blastocysts were available, the embryo transferred was chosen blindly with a 'True Random Number Generator' function where '0' stood for FPS-derived euploid blastocysts and '1' for LPS-derived ones (n = 70 and 56, respectively) on the website random.org. All embryos were obtained with the same ovarian stimulation protocol in FPS and LPS (GnRH antagonist protocol with fixed dose of rec-FSH plus rec-LH and GnRH-agonist trigger), culture conditions (continuous culture in a humidified atmosphere with 37°C, 6% CO2 and 5% O2) and laboratory protocols (ICSI, trophectoderm biopsy in Day 5-7 without assisted hatching in Day 3, vitrification and comprehensive chromosome testing). The women whose embryos were included had similar age (FPS: 38.5 ± 3.1 and LPS: 38.5 ± 3.2 years), prevalence of male factor, antral follicle count, basal hormonal characteristics, main cause of infertility and previous reproductive history (i.e. previous live births, miscarriages and implantation failures) whether the embryo came from FPS or LPS. All transfers were conducted after warming in an artificial cycle. The blastocysts transferred after FPS and LPS were similar in terms of day of full-development and morphological quality.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The positive pregnancy test rates for FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocysts were 57% and 62%, biochemical pregnancy loss rates were 10% and 8%, miscarriage rates were 15% and 14% and LBRs were 44% (n = 80/182, 95% CI 37-51%) and 49% (n = 102/207, 95% CI 42-56%; P = 0.3), respectively. The overall odds ratio for live birth (LPS vs FPS (reference)) adjusted for day of blastocyst development and quality, was 1.3, 95% CI 0.8-2.0, P = 0.2. Among patients with euploid blastocysts obtained following both FPS and LPS, the LBRs were also similar (53% (n = 37/70, 95% CI 41-65%) and 48% (n = 27/56, 95% CI 35-62%) respectively; P = 0.7). Gestational issues were experienced by 7.5% of pregnant women after FPS- and 10% of women following LPS-derived euploid single blastocyst transfer. Perinatal issues were reported in 5% and 0% of the FPS- and LPS-derived newborns, respectively. The gestational weeks and birthweight were similar in the two groups. A 5% pre-term delivery rate was reported in both groups. A low birthweight was registered in 2.5% and 5% of the newborns, while 4% and 7% showed high birthweight, in FPS- and LPS-derived euploid blastocyst, respectively. Encompassing the 81 FPS-derived newborns, a total of 9% were small and 11% large for gestational age. Among the 102 LPS-derived newborns, 8% were small and 6% large for gestational age. No significant difference was reported for all these comparisons.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The LPS-derived blastocysts were all obtained after FPS in a DuoStim protocol. Therefore, studies are required with LPS-only, late-FPS and random start approaches. The study is powered to assess differences in the LBR per embryo transfer, therefore obstetric and perinatal outcomes should be considered observational. Although prospective, the study was not registered.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study represents a further backing of the safety of non-conventional COS protocols. Therefore, LPS after FPS (DuoStim protocol) is confirmed a feasible and efficient approach also from clinical, obstetric and perinatal perspectives, targeted at patients who need to reach the transfer of an euploid blastocyst in the shortest timeframe possible due to reasons such as cancer, advanced maternal age and/or reduced ovarian reserve and poor ovarian response.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: are we examining the correct outcomes?

Questions continue to be raised regarding the benefit of genetic assessment of embryos prior to transfer in IVF, specifically with regards to preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). To evaluate and quantify these concerns, we appraised the most recent (2012-2019) randomized controlled trials on the topic. Only two of these six studies listed cumulative live birth rates per started cycle, with both eliciting a statistically non-significant result. This article describes the concern that a focus on results from the first embryo transfer compared to cumulative outcomes falsely construes PGT-A as having superior outcomes, whilst its true benefit is not confirmed, and it cannot actually improve the true pregnancy outcome of an embryo pool.

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in uterus transplant patients

Uterus transplantation is an emerging treatment for uterine factor infertility. In vitro fertilization with cryopreservation of embryos prior is required before a patient can be listed for transplant. Whether or not to perform universal preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy should be addressed by centers considering a uterus transplant program. The advantages and disadvantages of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in this unique population are presented. The available literature is reviewed to determine the utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in uterus transplantation protocols. Theoretical benefits of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy include decreased time to pregnancy in a population that benefits from minimization of exposure to immunosuppressive agents and decreased chance of spontaneous abortion requiring a dilation and curettage. Drawbacks include increased cost per in vitro fertilization cycle, increased number of required in vitro fertilization cycles to achieve a suitable number of embryos prior to listing for transplant, and a questionable benefit to live birth rate in younger patients. Thoughtful consideration of whether or not to use preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is necessary in uterus transplant trials. Age is likely a primary factor that can be useful in determining which uterus transplant recipients benefit from preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

An overview of the current and emerging platforms for preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) in in vitro fertilization programs

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and PGT for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) have currently been used widely, aiming to improve IVF outcomes. Although with many years of unsatisfactory results, PGT-A has been revived because new technologies have been adopted, such as platforms to examine all 24 types of chromosomes in blastocysts. This report compiles current knowledge regarding the available PGT platforms, including quantitative PCR, array CGH, and next-generation sequencing. The diagnostic capabilities of are compared and respective advantages/disadvantages outlined. We also address the limitations of current technologies, such as assignment of embryos with balanced translocation. We also discuss the emerging novel PGT technologies that likely will change our future practice, such as non-invasive PGT examining spent culture medium. Current literature suggest that most platforms can effectively reach concordant results regarding whole-chromosome ploidy status of all 24 types of chromosomes. However, different platforms have different resolutions and experimental complexities; leading to different turnaround time, throughput and differential capabilities of detecting mosaicism, segmental mutations, unbalanced translocations, concurrent PGT-A and PGT-M etc. Based on these information, IVF staff can more appropriately interpret PGT data and counsel patients, and select suitable platforms to meet personalized needs. The present report also concisely discusses some crucial clinical outcomes by PGT, which can clarify the role of applying PGT in daily IVF programs. Finally the up-to-date information about the novel use of current technologies and the newly emerging technologies will also help identify the focus areas for the design of new platforms for PGT in the future.