1
|
Chen J. Gendering the beginning of life: Taiwanese gay fathers' navigation of preimplantation genetic diagnosis-assisted sex selection in transnational third-party reproduction. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2024; 46:907-925. [PMID: 38149776 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.13747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/28/2023]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been used not only to avoid genetic diseases and increase conception success rates but also to perform non-medical sex selection, particularly in the surging cross-border reproductive care (CBRC). In the context of commercialised biomedicine, assisted reproductive technologies, such as lifestyle sex selection, have been tailored to meet intended parents' preferences. However, there is a lack of analysis on how individuals' reproductive decisions on PGD-assisted sex selection were shaped within the sociocultural norms and CBRC. This article explores Taiwanese gay fathers' navigations on sex selection while seeking third-party reproduction overseas because of local legal constraints. Drawing on in-depth interviews with 53 gay fathers (to-be), I analysed how 'individual preferences' were dynamically shaped by local sociocultural norms and embedded within transnational settings of routinising PGD in chosen repro-destinations. The findings showed that gay fathers mobilised strategic discourses on non-medical sex selection from both the local and the global to negotiate their decisions in coherence with their LGBTQ+ identity and their role as sons carrying familial responsibility to procreate male heirs. This article proposed a nuanced understanding of gay fathers' reproductive practices of 'gendering the beginning of life' through PGD-assisted sex selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Chen
- Department of Sociology, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alon I, Bussod I, Ravitsky V. Mapping ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT). J Assist Reprod Genet 2024; 41:1153-1171. [PMID: 38512655 PMCID: PMC11143109 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-024-03076-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Preimplantation Genetic Testing (PGT) has attracted considerable ethical, legal, and social scrutiny, but academic debate often fails to reflect clinical realities. METHODS Addressing this disconnect, a review of 506 articles from 1999 to 2019 across humanities and social sciences was conducted to synthesize the Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications (ELSI) of PGT. This review mined PubMed, WoS, and Scopus databases, using both MeSH terms and keywords to map out the research terrain. RESULTS The findings reveal a tenfold increase in global research output on PGT's ELSI from 1999 to 2019, signifying rising interest and concern. Despite heightened theoretical discourse on selecting "optimal" offspring, such practices were scarcely reported in clinical environments. Conversely, critical issues like PGT funding and familial impacts remain underexplored. Notably, 86% of the ELSI literature originates from just 12 countries, pointing to a research concentration. CONCLUSION This review underscores an urgent need for ELSI research to align more closely with clinical practice, promoting collaborations among ethicists, clinicians, policymakers, and economists. Such efforts are essential for grounding debates in practical relevance, ultimately steering PGT towards ethical integrity, societal acceptance, and equitable access, aiming to harmonize PGT research with real-world clinical concerns, enhancing the relevance and impact of future ethical discussions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ido Alon
- Department of Development Economics, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
- University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thompson WS, Babayev SN, McGowan ML, Kattah AG, Wick MJ, Bendel-Stenzel EM, Chebib FT, Harris PC, Dahl NK, Torres VE, Hanna C. State of the Science and Ethical Considerations for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Cystic Kidney Diseases and Ciliopathies. J Am Soc Nephrol 2024; 35:235-248. [PMID: 37882743 PMCID: PMC10843344 DOI: 10.1681/asn.0000000000000253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
There is a broad phenotypic spectrum of monogenic polycystic kidney diseases (PKDs). These disorders often involve cilia-related genes and lead to the development of fluid-filled cysts and eventual kidney function decline and failure. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic (PGT-M) disorders has moved into the clinical realm. It allows prospective parents to avoid passing on heritable diseases to their children, including monogenic PKD. The PGT-M process involves embryo generation through in vitro fertilization, with subsequent testing of embryos and selective transfer of those that do not harbor the specific disease-causing variant(s). There is a growing body of literature supporting the success of PGT-M for autosomal-dominant and autosomal-recessive PKD, although with important technical limitations in some cases. This technology can be applied to many other types of monogenic PKD and ciliopathies despite the lack of existing reports in the literature. PGT-M for monogenic PKD, like other forms of assisted reproductive technology, raises important ethical questions. When considering PGT-M for kidney diseases, as well as the potential to avoid disease in future generations, there are regulatory and ethical considerations. These include limited government regulation and unstandardized consent processes, potential technical errors, high cost and equity concerns, risks associated with pregnancy for mothers with kidney disease, and the impact on all involved in the process, including the children who were made possible with this technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney S. Thompson
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Neonatal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Samir N. Babayev
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michelle L. McGowan
- Center for Individualized Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Biomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrea G. Kattah
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Myra J. Wick
- Department of Clinical Genomics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Fouad T. Chebib
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Peter C. Harris
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Neera K. Dahl
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Vicente E. Torres
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Christian Hanna
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herweck A, DeSantis C, Shandley LM, Kawwass JF, Hipp HS. International gestational surrogacy in the United States, 2014-2020. Fertil Steril 2024:S0015-0282(23)02142-8. [PMID: 38176517 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe characteristics, trends, and outcomes of international gestational surrogacy cycles in the United States (US). DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING All assisted reproductive technology cycles in the US reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting Systems that included an embryo transfer to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020. PATIENTS International vs. US intended parents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cycle characteristics, geographic distributions, and obstetrical outcomes. RESULTS Of 40,177 embryo transfers to a gestational carrier from 2014 to 2020, 32% were for international intended parents. The number and percent of international intended parents' gestational carrier cycles increased each year from 2014 (n = 2758, 22.0%) to 2019 (n = 4905, 39.8%) with a decrease in 2020 (n = 4713, 31.8%). Compared with cycles for US intended parents, there was a larger decrease in gestational carrier cycles between 2019 and 2020 for international intended parents (3.9% vs. 32.2%). International intended parents were more likely to be male sex (41.3% vs. 19.6%), older than 42 years (33.9% vs. 26.2%) and identify as Asian race (65.6% vs. 16.5%). International intended parents were largely from China (41.7%), followed by France (9.2%) and Spain (8.5%). Gestational carriers for international intended parents were more commonly younger than 30 years (42.8% vs. 29.1%) and identified as Hispanic race (28.6% vs. 11.7%) compared with gestational carriers for US intended parents. Cycles with international intended parents were more likely to use donor eggs (67.1% vs. 43.5%), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (72.8% vs. 55.4%), and preimplantation genetic testing (79.0% vs. 55.8%). Cycles with international and US intended parents had similar obstetrical outcomes, including live birth (adjusted risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.03) and multiple pregnancy (adjusted risk ratio 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.94-1.06) rates. CONCLUSION An increasing number of international intended parents are utilizing gestational surrogacy in the US and more frequently using cost-enhancing specialized treatment techniques. This increase is potentially because of restrictive international commercial surrogacy laws and the increased availability of reproductive medical expertise. Given this growing demographic, continued examination of the volume of cross-border reproductive treatment, as well as the legal and ethical considerations, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Herweck
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
| | - Carol DeSantis
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Program, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lisa M Shandley
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jennifer F Kawwass
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Heather S Hipp
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory Reproductive Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kushnir VA, Adashi EY, Cohen IG. Preimplantation sex selection via in vitro fertilization: time for a reappraisal. F S Rep 2023; 4:241-243. [PMID: 37719093 PMCID: PMC10504547 DOI: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
In recent years, there has been rapid increase in the availability of elective sex selection via genetic testing of preimplantation embryos created through in vitro fertilization. We explore the standing of this ethically controversial practice in the context of a changing legal landscape after the Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health decision by the US Supreme Court.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vitaly A. Kushnir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California Irvine, Orange, California
| | - Eli Y. Adashi
- Division of Medicine and Biological Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - I. Glenn Cohen
- Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tierney KI. Geographic distribution of assisted reproductive technology clinics in the USA: a multilevel sociodemographic analysis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2022; 39:2505-2519. [PMID: 36103005 PMCID: PMC9723016 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02607-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate whether sociodemographic characteristics of US Census tracts and counties and state-level infertility insurance policy are associated with the presence of assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics. METHODS Multilevel logistic regression analyses using publicly available reports of ART clinic locations (2014-2018) matched with sociodemographic data from the US Census Bureau and state infertility insurance policy information. RESULTS At the tract-level, multivariate multilevel logistic regression found significant associations with the likelihood of an ART clinic in a tract and the size of the tract population (adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 1.063, SE = 0.018, p < .001), the tract median household income (aOR = 0.990, SE = 0.002, p < 0.001), and the percentages of the population who were Hispanic (aOR = 0.975, SE = 0.007, p < 0.001), women over 25 with a bachelor's degree or higher (aOR: 1.052, SE = 0.004, p < 0.001), and foreign-born (aOR: 1.037, SE = 0.009, p < .001). At the county-level, significant associations were found with the county median household income (aOR: 1.016, SE = 0.006, p < .01) and the percentage of the population that identified as Black (aOR = 1.013, SE = 0.006, p < .05) and Hispanic (aOR = 1.028, SE = 0.009, p < .05). Multivariate models showed no associations between tract clinic counts and state infertility policy. CONCLUSION There is mixed evidence that clinic concentration is associated with expected sociodemographics. In particular, physical proximity may not principally drive racial disparities in ART access. Furthermore, insurance mandates are not associated with the presence of an ART clinics in a tract, suggesting alternative policy levers may be needed to address differential access and utilization of ART services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine I Tierney
- Department of Sociology, Western Michigan University, 1903 W. Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo, MI, 49008-5257, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tierney K. The Future of Assisted Reproductive Technology Live Births in the United States. POPULATION RESEARCH AND POLICY REVIEW 2022; 41:2289-2309. [PMID: 35874801 PMCID: PMC9289087 DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09731-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Tierney
- Department of Sociology, Western Michigan University, 1903 W. Michigan Ave, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5257 USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McLean L, Ros ST, Hollond C, Stofan J, Quinn GP. Patient and clinician experiences with cross-border reproductive care: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:1943-1952. [PMID: 35339328 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This review analyzes the experiences of patients and clinicians with regards to international cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) for the purpose of conception. METHODS Electronic databases PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched using 'medical tourism' AND 'assisted reproductive technology' from 1978 to 2020. RESULTS Predominant patient motivators for CBRC were cost and legality of assisted reproduction technology (ART) in one's home country, followed by cultural factors like shared language, religion, and cultural familiarity. Clinicians suggested global laws for CBRC would reduce the potential for exploitation of vulnerable populations but believed the enactment of international regulations unlikely and, even if enacted, difficult to enforce. CONCLUSIONS While patient and clinician experiences with CBRC varied, patients frequently cited financial and legal reasons for pursuing CBRC, while many providers had concern for the patient's safety. CLINICAL PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS This review recommends clinicians involved in family planning counsel patients seeking treatment abroad by: (i) informing patients of the risks and benefits of treatment abroad, (ii) establishing guidelines and standards for clinicians on resuming patient care post-CBRC, and (iii) creating a directory of reputable CBRC clinicians and experts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura McLean
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA.
| | - Stephanie T Ros
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | | | - Jordan Stofan
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Horsey K, Gibson G, Lamanna G, Priddle H, Linara-Demakakou E, Nair S, Arian-Schad M, Thackare H, Rimington M, Macklon N, Ahuja K. First clinical report of 179 surrogacy cases in the UK: implications for policy and practice. Reprod Biomed Online 2022; 45:831-838. [PMID: 35907684 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What implications for policy and practice can be derived from outcomes and trends observed across 8 years of a surrogacy programme in two UK-regulated IVF centres (London, Cardiff)? DESIGN Retrospective cohort study analysing surrogacy treatments undertaken between 2014 and September 2021. RESULTS Surrogacy continues to rise in popularity in the UK despite the inability of those supporting safe and professional practice to advertise to recruit surrogates. In two IVF centres regulated by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA), both the number of surrogacy treatments and the proportion of those undertaken on behalf of same-sex male intended parents increased year on year in the period studied. From a cohort of 108 surrogates, 71 babies were born to 61 surrogates (with five pregnancies ongoing) by February 2022. No statistically significant difference in live birth rates (LBR) was observed between the heterosexual couples and same-sex male couples. Sample sizes of single and transgender intended parents were too small (n < 5) to compare. The use of vitrified oocytes in surrogacy treatments has increased year on year, while fresh oocyte use has declined since peaking in 2019. There was no significant difference in LBR between fresh and vitrified oocyte usage across the cohort. CONCLUSIONS The number of surrogacy treatments steadily increased, with clear evidence that the proportion of same-sex male couples accessing surrogacy is a major contributor to this growth. Vitrified/warmed oocyte use now outstrips the use of fresh oocytes in the surrogacy treatment cycles studied here. The results represent a strong basis for supporting the liberalization of regulatory reform expected to be introduced in the UK later in 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kirsty Horsey
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Grace Gibson
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Giuseppina Lamanna
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Helen Priddle
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | | | - Shailaja Nair
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Mimi Arian-Schad
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Hemlata Thackare
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Michael Rimington
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Nicholas Macklon
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK
| | - Kamal Ahuja
- London Women's Clinic, London Egg Bank, 113-115 Harley Street, London W1G 6AP, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cross-border reproductive care: an Ethics Committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2022; 117:954-962. [PMID: 35216836 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Cross-border reproductive care is a growing worldwide phenomenon, raising questions about why assisted reproductive technology patients travel for care, what harms and benefits may result, and what duties health care providers may have in advising and treating the patients who travel for reproductive services. Cross-border care may benefit or harm assisted reproductive technology stakeholders, including patients, offspring, providers, gamete donors, gestational carriers, and local populations in destination countries. This document replaces the previous document of the same name, last published in 2016.
Collapse
|
11
|
Caughey LE, Lensen S, White KM, Peate M. Disposition intentions of elective egg freezers toward their surplus frozen oocytes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2021; 116:1601-1619. [PMID: 34452749 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.07.1195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the disposition outcomes and disposition intentions of elective egg freezers (EEFs) toward their surplus frozen oocytes and the psychosocial determinants underlying these. DESIGN A systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Actual EEFs (women with oocytes in storage), potential EEFs (women investigating elective oocyte cryopreservation or about to freeze their oocytes), and women of reproductive age (women in the community aged ≥18 years). INTERVENTION(S) A systematic review was undertaken and electronically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO on the Ovid platform for conference abstracts and peer-reviewed articles, published in English after January 1, 2010. A search strategy combined synonyms for oocyte, cryopreservation, donation, disposition, elective, and attitude. Eligible studies assessed disposition outcomes (how an oocyte was disposed of) and disposition intentions (how women intend to dispose of an oocyte) and/or the psychosocial determinants underlying disposition outcomes and intentions. The Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Tool was used to assess the risk of bias. A meta-analysis using random effects was applied to pool proportions of women with similar disposition intentions toward their oocytes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Disposition outcomes and intentions toward surplus frozen oocytes: donate to research; donate to others; discard; unsure. Psychosocial determinants (beliefs, attitudes, barriers, and facilitators) of disposition outcomes and intentions. RESULT(S) A total of 3,560 records were identified, of which 22 (17 studies) met the inclusion criteria (8 studies from Europe, 7 from North America, and 2 from Asia). No studies reported on past oocyte disposition outcomes. Seventeen studies reported on the future disposition intentions of 5,446 women. Only 2 of the 17 studies reported on the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition intentions. There was substantial heterogeneity in the pooled results, which was likely a result of the significant variation in methodology. Actual EEFs were included in eight studies (n = 873), of whom 53% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44-63; I2, 87%) would donate surplus oocytes to research, 31% (95% CI, 23-40; I2, 72%) were unsure, 26% (95% CI, 17-38; I2, 92%) would donate to others, and 12% (95% CI, 6-21; I2, 88%) would discard their eggs. Psychosocial determinants: One study reported that 50% of these women were aware of friends and/or family having difficulty conceiving, which may have contributed to their willingness to donate to others. Potential EEFs were included in 4 studies (n = 645), of whom 38% (95% CI, 28-50; I2, 84%) would donate to research, 32% (95% CI, 17-51; I2, 91%) would donate to others, 29% (95% CI, 17-44; I2, 89%) would discard, and 7% (95% CI, 1-27; I2, 77%) were unsure. Psychosocial determinants: No studies. Women of reproductive age were included in 5 studies (n = 3,933), of whom 59% (95% CI, 48-70; I2, 97%) would donate to research and 46% (95% CI, 35-57; I2, 98%) would donate to others. "Unsure" and "discard" were not provided as response options. Psychosocial determinants: One study reported that the facilitators for donation to others included a family member or friend in need, to help others create a family, financial gain, to further science, and control or input over the selection of recipients. Barriers for donation included fear of having a biological child they do not know or who is raised by someone they know. CONCLUSION(S) No studies reported on the disposition outcomes of past EEFs. Disposition intentions varied across the three groups; however, "donating to research" was the most common disposition preference. Notably, the second disposition preference for one-third of actual EEFs was "unsure" and for one-third of potential EEFs was "donate to others." There were limited studies for actual and potential EEFs, and only two studies that explored the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition intentions. Additionally, these data suggest that disposition decisions change as women progress on their egg freezing journey, highlighting the importance of ongoing contact with the fertility team as intentions may change over time. More research is needed to understand the psychosocial determinants of oocyte disposition decisions so fertility clinics can provide EEFs with the support and information they need to make informed decisions about their stored eggs and reduce the level of uncertainty reported among EEFs and the potential risk of psychological distress and regret. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER PROSPERO 2020: CRD42020202733.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy E Caughey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| | - Katherine M White
- School of Psychology and Counselling, Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michelle Peate
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Melbourne, Level 7, Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Utilization of preimplantation genetic testing in the USA. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1045-1053. [PMID: 33904009 PMCID: PMC8190209 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02078-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the use of preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) and live birth rates (LBR) in the USA from 2014 to 2017 and to understand how PGT is being used at a clinic and state level. METHODS This study accessed SART data for 2014 to 2017 to determine LBR and the CDC for years 2016 and 2017 to identify PGT usage. Primary cycles included only the first embryo transfer within 1 year of an oocyte retrieval; subsequent cycles included transfers occurring after the first transfer or beyond 1 year of oocyte retrieval. RESULTS In the SART data, the number of primary PGT cycles showed a significant monotonic annual increase from 18,805 in 2014 to 54,442 in 2017 (P = 0.042) and subsequent PGT cycles in these years increased from 2946 to 14,361 (P = 0.01). There was a significant difference in primary PGT cycle use by age, where younger women had a greater percentage of PGT treatment cycles than older women. In both PGT and non-PGT cycles, the LBR per oocyte retrieval decreased significantly from 2014 to 2017 (P<0001) and younger women had a significantly higher LBR per oocyte retrieval compared to older women (P < 0.001). The CDC data revealed that in 2016, just 53 (11.4%) clinics used PGT for more than 50% of their cycles, which increased to 99 (21.4%) clinics in 2017 (P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS A growing number of US clinics are offering PGT to their patients. These findings support re-evaluation of the application for PGT.
Collapse
|
13
|
Jacobson H. Cross-border reproductive care in the USA: Who comes, why do they come, what do they purchase? REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2020; 11:42-47. [PMID: 33204864 PMCID: PMC7653003 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
This article explores the participation of non-US-resident patients/clients in the US reproductive market, garnering a picture of cross-border reproductive care (CBRC) into the USA by drawing on the existing literature, identifying the frequency of and motivations for such arrangements, the primary sending countries, and the reproductive services sought. I find that although the expense of US CBRC necessarily limits the patient/client pool, it is largely non-economic factors that drive CBRC into the USA. The US CBRC patient/client base, which is diverse in terms of national origin, race and sexual orientation, is recruited by the US fertility industry and drawn to the full range of assisted reproductive technology (ART) services, such as in-vitro fertilization, surrogacy, oocyte donation and preimplantation genetic screening/preimplantation genetic diagnosis, available in the US market which are often restricted or limited in their countries of origin. CBRC patients/clients enjoy the legal clarity for establishing parentage and citizenship for their children available in the USA, as well as what some view as a medically and ethically superior ART market.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Jacobson
- Department of Sociology and Anthropology, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Inhorn MC. Reprint: Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2020; 11:110-121. [PMID: 34136666 PMCID: PMC8178439 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2021.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown's infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the 'hope technology' which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted 'quests for conception'. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories - namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men's eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own 'masculine hope technology'; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are 'good to think with' in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.
Collapse
|
15
|
Inhorn MC. Where has the quest for conception taken us? Lessons from anthropology and sociology. REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE & SOCIETY ONLINE 2020; 10:46-57. [PMID: 32760816 PMCID: PMC7393315 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Revised: 04/04/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
Abstract
Louise Brown, the world's first test-tube baby, was born more than 40 years ago in England. For Louise Brown's infertile mother, Lesley, in-vitro fertilization (IVF) was the 'hope technology' which allowed her to overcome her tubal infertility after 9 years of heart-breaking involuntary childlessness. Since then, IVF has travelled to diverse global locations, where millions of individuals and couples have embarked on technologically assisted 'quests for conception'. After 40 years of IVF, where has the quest for conception taken us? This article outlines seven major global trajectories - namely, that the quest for conception has become more: (i) technological, because of a profusion of IVF-based innovations; (ii) masculine, because of men's eager uptake of intracytoplasmic sperm injection, their own 'masculine hope technology'; (iii) stratified, due to persistent race- and class-based barriers in IVF access; (iv) transnational, as infertile and other involuntarily childless people search across borders to overcome restrictions in their home countries; (v) selective, as IVF-based reprogenetic technologies eliminate genetic disease while exacerbating sex selection; (vi) moral, as religious sensibilities both accommodate and curtail the possibilities and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART); and (vii) extended, as new cryopreservation technologies prolong the reproductive lifespan and extend reproduction to the transgender community. The article concludes with thoughts on where future quests for conception might take us, and why IVF and other reproductive technologies are 'good to think with' in both the anthropology and sociology of reproduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcia C Inhorn
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Incidence of surrogacy in the USA and Israel and implications on women's health: a quantitative comparison. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2459-2469. [PMID: 31673853 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01612-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Gestational surrogacy (GS) has been researched in multiple qualitative studies. In contrast, quantitative aspects of the practice are conspicuously understudied. The present article assesses and compares the incidence of GS in the USA and Israel, two industrialized countries that have maintained active commercial surrogacy practice, for over two decades. METHOD The article is a secondary analysis of GS figures published by the Israeli Parliament's Centre for Research and Information (2018) and by the USA's Centers for Disease Control (2016) and related professional publications. Each dataset is analyzed in reference to the respective country, so as to devise local incidence scores that are then juxtaposed in inter-country comparison. RESULTS The incidence of GS rises steeply in both countries. Though US surrogates are contracted by local and international, heterosexual and gay, and partnered and single intended parents, the relative incidence of GS is lower in the USA than in Israel, where only local heterosexual couples could contract a gestational surrogate. An exceptionally high rate of multiple births was observed in both settings, suggesting some overlooking of professional recommendations for elective single-embryo transfer. CONCLUSION GS incidence appears to resemble the ratio between the countries' respective fertility rates. The paper underscores two main risks facing gestational surrogates: the risk of not conceiving and not being paid and the risk of carrying a multiple pregnancy, which is extremely prevalent in GS pregnancies, and sustaining the short- and long-term health complications that are more prevalent in such pregnancies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Foley BM, Haglin JM, Tanzer JR, Eltorai AEM. Patient care without borders: a systematic review of medical and surgical tourism. J Travel Med 2019; 26:5528799. [PMID: 31281926 DOI: 10.1093/jtm/taz049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medical tourism (MT) is an increasingly utilized modality for acquiring medical treatment for patients globally. This review assimilates the current literature regarding MT, with particular focus on the applications, ethics and economics. METHODS A systematic review of MEDLINE and PubMed Central databases for publications relating to MT from 2005 to 2018 yielded 43 articles for this review. RESULTS Patients seeking elective bariatric, cosmetic and orthopedic surgery abroad are motivated by significantly lower costs, all-inclusive vacation packages and reduced wait times. Complication rates as high as 56% include infection, poor aesthetic and functional outcome and adverse cardiovascular events. Cross-border reproductive care has steadily increased due to less restrictive policies in select countries; however, the depth of research on outcomes and quality of care is abysmal. Stem cell therapy promise treatments that are often not well researched and offer minimal evidence of efficacy, yet patients are drawn to treatment through anecdotal advertisements and a last sense of hope. Transplant surgery sought to decrease wait times carries many of the similar aforementioned risks and may contribute to the practice of organ trafficking in countries with high rates of poverty. Patients and countries alike are motivated by a plethora of factors to engage in the MT industry but may be doing so without accurate knowledge of the quality, safety or potential for economic gain. Safety is of utmost importance to prevent surgical complications and the spread of treatment-resistant bacteria. CONCLUSIONS MT is growing in popularity and complexity. The lack of standardization in its definition and regulation leads to difficulty in epidemiologic and economic analysis and ethical issues of informed consent and health equity. The findings of this review may be used by the stakeholders of MT, including patients and providers, to enhance informed decision-making and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brittany M Foley
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
| | - Jack M Haglin
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ 85054, Kingston, RI 02881, USA
| | | | - Adam E M Eltorai
- Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI 02903, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yee S, Goodman CV, Librach CL. Determinants of gestational surrogates’ satisfaction in relation to the characteristics of surrogacy cases. Reprod Biomed Online 2019; 39:249-261. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Revised: 03/15/2019] [Accepted: 04/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
19
|
Whittaker A, Inhorn MC, Shenfield F. Globalised quests for assisted conception: Reproductive travel for infertility and involuntary childlessness. Glob Public Health 2019; 14:1669-1688. [PMID: 31204900 DOI: 10.1080/17441692.2019.1627479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The global movement of people across international borders to undergo assisted reproductive treatment is common, although there is little accurate data. In this article, we synthesise findings from our own empirical research on reproductive travel in addition to a review of clinical, ethical, legal, and regulatory complexities from studies on reproductive travel since 2010. Motivations for travel include legal and religious prohibitions; resource considerations; lack of access to gametes and reproductive assistors; quality and safety concerns; and personal preferences. Higher risks to mothers and children are associated with multiple embryo transfer and subsequent multiple and higher order pregnancies and the average older age of women undertaking reproductive travel. The potential exploitation of other women as providers of oocytes or surrogacy services, the lack of equity in access to assisted reproduction and the ambiguous legal status of children conceived from international reproductive travel are important ethical considerations. A range of significant legal issues remain given variable and limited international regulation. Scholarship on this trade necessarily engages with issues of power and gender, social inequities, global capitalism and the private decision-making of individuals seeking to form families. Research gaps remain given recent changes in the organisation, demands and destinations of the trade.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Whittaker
- School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Monash University , Melbourne , Australia
| | - Marcia C Inhorn
- Anthropology and International Affairs, Council on Middle East Studies, The MacMillan Center, Yale University , New Haven , CT , USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
The demise of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in Hungary and its effect on patient care. Eur J Med Genet 2019; 62:103669. [PMID: 31082515 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmg.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a suitable technique to identify euploid embryos, which have the highest potential to implant, thus increase the chance of a healthy live birth. The main indications of PGT-A are advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure, repeated miscarriages and severe male infertility. Several studies have already proven that testing embryos for genetic abnormalities in the above cases results in higher implantation rate and reduced number of pregnancy loss. In spite of these - due to a legislative change in Hungary in 2015 - PGT-A was reclassified as an experimental procedure and its use became banned throughout the country. For this reason, after 4 years of successful practice, Hungarian patients were not able to participate in IVF procedure combined with PGT-A anymore. In this retrospective analysis, efficacy of PGT-A-based embryo selection was evaluated and was compared to the conventional morphology-based selection (MBS) in patients with advanced maternal age, between 2013 and 2017 at our private fertility clinic. PGT-A was performed with array comparative genomic hybridization. We found that implantation rate was significantly higher (43.62% vs. 27.88%; p = 0.0208) and miscarriage rate was significantly lower (17.07% vs. 37.93%; p = 0.0492) in the PGT-A group compared to the MBS group from 2013 to 2015. These outcomes were achieved with a significantly lower number of transferred embryos in the PGT-A group (1.25 vs. 1.58; p = 0.0003). In 2016-2017, the number of transferred embryos were significantly reduced in the MBS group as well (1.14 vs. 1.58; p < 0.0001). However, outcomes of the IVF treatments did not change significantly compared to the previous two years (2013-2015). Our results imply that PGT-A-based embryo selection is more efficient than morphology-based selection in patients with advanced maternal age. Therefore, prohibition of the use of PGT-A had significant consequences on the efficiency and safety of IVF treatment in the country.
Collapse
|
21
|
Sunderam S, Kissin DM, Zhang Y, Folger SG, Boulet SL, Warner L, Callaghan WM, Barfield WD. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2016. MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY WEEKLY REPORT. SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES (WASHINGTON, D.C. : 2002) 2019; 68:1-23. [PMID: 31022165 PMCID: PMC6493873 DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.ss6804a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 110] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PROBLEM/CONDITION Since the first U.S. infant conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART) was born in 1981, both the use of ART and the number of fertility clinics providing ART services have increased steadily in the United States. ART includes fertility treatments in which eggs or embryos are handled in the laboratory (i.e., in vitro fertilization [IVF] and related procedures). Although the majority of infants conceived through ART are singletons, women who undergo ART procedures are more likely than women who conceive naturally to deliver multiple-birth infants. Multiple births pose substantial risks for both mothers and infants, including obstetric complications, preterm delivery (<37 weeks), and low birthweight (<2,500 g). This report provides state-specific information for the United States (including the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico) on ART procedures performed in 2016 and compares birth outcomes that occurred in 2016 (resulting from ART procedures performed in 2015 and 2016) with outcomes for all infants born in the United States in 2016. PERIOD COVERED 2016. DESCRIPTION OF SYSTEM In 1995, CDC began collecting data on ART procedures performed in fertility clinics in the United States as mandated by the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992 (FCSRCA) (Public Law 102-493 [October 24, 1992]). Data are collected through the National ART Surveillance System (NASS), a web-based data collection system developed by CDC. This report includes data from 52 reporting areas (the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico). RESULTS In 2016, a total of 197,706 ART procedures (range: 162 in Wyoming to 24,030 in California) with the intent to transfer at least one embryo were performed in 463 U.S. fertility clinics and reported to CDC. These procedures resulted in 65,964 live-birth deliveries (range: 57 in Puerto Rico to 8,638 in California) and 76,892 infants born (range: 74 in Alaska to 9,885 in California). Nationally, the number of ART procedures performed per 1 million women of reproductive age (15-44 years), a proxy measure of the ART use rate, was 3,075. ART use rates exceeded the national rate in 14 reporting areas (Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Utah, and Virginia). ART use exceeded 1.5 times the national rate in nine states, including three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) that also had comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage for ART procedures (i.e., coverage for at least four oocyte retrievals). Nationally, among ART transfer procedures for patients using fresh embryos from their own eggs, the average number of embryos transferred increased with increasing age (1.5 among women aged <35 years, 1.7 among women aged 35-37 years, and 2.2 among women aged >37 years). Among women aged <35 years, the national elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) rate was 42.7% (range: 8.3% in North Dakota to 83.9% in Delaware). In 2016, ART contributed to 1.8% of all infants born in the United States (range: 0.3% in Puerto Rico to 4.7% in Massachusetts). ART also contributed to 16.4% of all multiple-birth infants, including 16.2% of all twin infants and 19.4% of all triplets and higher-order infants. ART-conceived twins accounted for approximately 96.5% (21,455 of 22,233) of all ART-conceived infants born in multiple deliveries. The percentage of multiple-birth infants was higher among infants conceived with ART (31.5%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (3.4%). Approximately 30.4% of ART-conceived infants were twins and 1.1% were triplets and higher-order infants. Nationally, infants conceived with ART contributed to 5.0% of all low birthweight (<2,500 g) infants. Among ART-conceived infants, 23.6% had low birthweight compared with 8.2% among all infants. ART-conceived infants contributed to 5.3% of all preterm (gestational age <37 weeks) infants. The percentage of preterm births was higher among infants conceived with ART (29.9%) than among all infants born in the total birth population (9.9%). The percentage of ART-conceived infants who had low birthweight was 8.7% among singletons, 54.9% among twins, and 94.9% among triplets and higher-order multiples; the corresponding percentages among all infants born were 6.2% among singletons, 55.4% among twins, and 94.6% among triplets and higher-order multiples. The percentage of ART-conceived infants who were born preterm was 13.7% among singletons, 64.2% among twins, and 97.0% among triplets and higher-order infants; the corresponding percentages among all infants were 7.8% for singletons, 59.9% for twins, and 97.7% for triplets and higher-order infants. INTERPRETATION Multiple births from ART contributed to a substantial proportion of all twins, triplets, and higher-order infants born in the United States. For women aged <35 years, who typically are considered good candidates for eSET, on average, 1.5 embryos were transferred per ART procedure, resulting in higher multiple birth rates than could be achieved with single-embryo transfers. Of the four states (Illinois, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island) with comprehensive mandated health insurance coverage, three (Illinois, Massachusetts, and New Jersey) had rates of ART use >1.5 times the national average. Although other factors might influence ART use, insurance coverage for infertility treatments accounts for some of the difference in per capita ART use observed among states because most states do not mandate any coverage for ART treatment. PUBLIC HEALTH ACTION Twins account for almost all of ART-conceived multiple births born in multiple deliveries. Reducing the number of embryos transferred and increasing use of eSET, when clinically appropriate, could help reduce multiple births and related adverse health consequences for both mothers and infants. Because multiple-birth infants are at increased risk for numerous adverse sequelae that cannot be ascertained from the data collected through NASS alone, long-term follow-up of ART infants through integration of existing maternal and infant health surveillance systems and registries with data available from NASS might be useful for monitoring adverse outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saswati Sunderam
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Dmitry M. Kissin
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Yujia Zhang
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Suzanne G. Folger
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | | | - Lee Warner
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - William M. Callaghan
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| | - Wanda D. Barfield
- Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Kim HH. Diversity of international surrogacy arrangements: considerations for cross-border reproductive care. Fertil Steril 2019; 111:467-468. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
23
|
Vitagliano A, Andrisani A, Alviggi C, Vitale SG, Valenti G, Sapia F, Favilli A, Martins WP, Raine-Ferring N, Polanski L, Ambrosini G. Endometrial scratching for infertile women undergoing a first embryo transfer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published and unpublished data from randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2019; 111:734-746.e2. [PMID: 30683590 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2018] [Revised: 12/06/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate endometrial scratch injury (ESI) as an intervention to improve IVF outcome in women undergoing a first ET. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Infertile women undergoing a first fresh/frozen embryo transfer. INTERVENTION(S) We included published and unpublished data from randomized controlled trials in which the intervention group received ESI and controls received placebo or no intervention. Pooled results were expressed as relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO to start the data extraction (CRD42018087786). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ongoing pregnancy/live birth rate (OPR/LBR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), multiple pregnancy rate (MPR), miscarriage rate (MR), and ectopic pregnancy rate (EPR). RESULT(S) Seven studies were included (1,354 participants). We found a nonsignificant difference between groups in terms of OPR/LBR, CPR, MR, MPR, and EPR. Subgroup analysis found that ESI on the day of oocyte retrieval (achieved by a Novak curette) reduced OPR/LBR (RR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.69) and CPR (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.18-0.71), whereas ESI during the cycle preceding ET (performed through soft devices) had no effect on OPR/LBR and CPR. No difference in the impact of ESI was observed between fresh and frozen embryo transfer. CONCLUSION(S) Current evidence does not support performing ESI with the purpose of improving the success of a first ET attempt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amerigo Vitagliano
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - Alessandra Andrisani
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science, and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Gaetano Valenti
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Sapia
- Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Alessandro Favilli
- Section of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Surgical and Biomedical Sciences, Santa Maria Della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Nick Raine-Ferring
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lukasz Polanski
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom; NURTURE Fertility, Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - Guido Ambrosini
- Unit of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Department of Women and Children's Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vitagliano A, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saccone G, Valenti G, Sapia F, Kamath MS, Blaganje M, Andrisani A, Ambrosini G. Endometrial scratch injury for women with one or more previous failed embryo transfers: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 2018; 110:687-702.e2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2018] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
25
|
Li HWR, Tank J, Haththotuwa R. Updated status of assisted reproductive technology activities in the Asia-Oceania region. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2018; 44:1667-1672. [PMID: 30058253 DOI: 10.1111/jog.13742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2018] [Accepted: 06/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM To report on a descriptive survey on the availability, regulation and funding issues of assisted reproductive technology (ART) activities in member countries of the Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (AOFOG). METHODS A survey questionnaire was initially sent out to representatives of the 28 member national societies of AOFOG in 2015, and final verification and compilation of data were completed in November 2017. RESULTS A response was received from 24 countries. Artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization treatments were available in 23 and 22 of them respectively. Of the 23 responding countries where ART activities were carried out, these were governed by legislation or national regulations in 12 of them, and 15 had a national registry, to which reporting was compulsory in 11 of them. Only Australia, Nepal, New Zealand and Saudi Arabia allowed ART treatment for both single men and women, while only Australia and New Zealand allowed ART treatment for homosexual couples. In Vietnam, ART treatment was allowed only for single women (but not men) from the same country. In Israel, only single or homosexual women but not men were allowed to receive ART treatment. Government subsidy was available for artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization treatments in 10 and 9 responding countries respectively. Compensation to gamete donors and surrogate mothers were allowed in some countries, mostly on the basis of covering the medical treatment cost and compensation for leave from work. CONCLUSION There is great diversity in the availability of various forms of ART treatments, their regulations and data-monitoring mechanisms, as well as funding issues, among Asian-Oceanic countries. Availability of ART activities involving donor gametes or surrogacy, or those for nonheterosexual unions, is still limited in this region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H W Raymond Li
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee, Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Pokfulam, Hong Kong
| | - Jaydeep Tank
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee, Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.,Ashwini Maternity and Surgical Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Rohana Haththotuwa
- Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility Committee, Asia and Oceania Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Pokfulam, Hong Kong.,Ninewells Care Mother and Baby Hospital, Colombo, Sri Lanka
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Salama M, Isachenko V, Isachenko E, Rahimi G, Mallmann P, Westphal LM, Inhorn MC, Patrizio P. Cross border reproductive care (CBRC): a growing global phenomenon with multidimensional implications (a systematic and critical review). J Assist Reprod Genet 2018; 35:1277-1288. [PMID: 29808382 PMCID: PMC6063838 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-018-1181-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Many people travel abroad to access fertility treatments. This growing phenomenon is known as cross border reproductive care (CBRC) or fertility tourism. Due to its complex nature and implications worldwide, CBRC has become an emerging dilemma deserving more attention on the global healthcare agenda. METHODS According to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic review of the literature was performed for all relevant full-text articles published in PubMed in English during the past 18 years to explore CBRC phenomenon in the new millennium. RESULTS Little is known about the accurate magnitude and scope of CBRC around the globe. In this systematic and critical review, we identify three major dimensions of CBRC: legal, economic, and ethical. We analyze each of these dimensions from clinical and practical perspectives. CONCLUSION CBRC is a growing reality worldwide with potential benefits and risks. Therefore, it is very crucial to regulate the global market of CBRC on legal, economic, and ethical bases in order to increase harmonization and reduce any forms of exploitation. Establishment of accurate international statistics and a global registry will help diminish the current information gap surrounding the CBRC phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany.
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, National Research Center, Cairo, Egypt.
| | - Vladimir Isachenko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Evgenia Isachenko
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Gohar Rahimi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Mallmann
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Kerpener St. 34, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Lynn M Westphal
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Marcia C Inhorn
- Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Pasquale Patrizio
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Commercialization, Altruism, Clinical Practice: Seeking Explanation for Similarities and Differences in Californian and Canadian Gestational Surrogacy Outcomes. Womens Health Issues 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2018.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
28
|
Paulson RJ. Cross-border reproductive care: what is its significance? Fertil Steril 2017; 108:761-762. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.09.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|