1
|
Rydze RT, Schoyer KD. When to say when: optimal number of intrauterine insemination treatment cycles. Fertil Steril 2024; 122:72-73. [PMID: 38697238 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.04.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/04/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Robert T Rydze
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Kate D Schoyer
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sonigo C, Robin G, Boitrelle F, Fraison E, Sermondade N, Mathieu d'Argent E, Bouet PE, Dupont C, Creux H, Peigné M, Pirrello O, Trombert S, Lecorche E, Dion L, Rocher L, Arama E, Bernard V, Monnet M, Miquel L, Birsal E, Haïm-Boukobza S, Plotton I, Ravel C, Grzegorczyk-Martin V, Huyghe É, Dupuis HGA, Lefebvre T, Leperlier F, Bardet L, Lalami I, Robin C, Simon V, Dijols L, Riss J, Koch A, Bailly C, Rio C, Lebret M, Jegaden M, Fernandez H, Pouly JL, Torre A, Belaisch-Allart J, Antoine JM, Courbiere B. [First-line management of infertile couple. Guidelines for clinical practice of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2022]. GYNECOLOGIE, OBSTETRIQUE, FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE 2024; 52:305-335. [PMID: 38311310 DOI: 10.1016/j.gofs.2024.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To update the 2010 CNGOF clinical practice guidelines for the first-line management of infertile couples. MATERIALS AND METHODS Five major themes (first-line assessment of the infertile woman, first-line assessment of the infertile man, prevention of exposure to environmental factors, initial management using ovulation induction regimens, first-line reproductive surgery) were identified, enabling 28 questions to be formulated using the Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) format. Each question was addressed by a working group that had carried out a systematic review of the literature since 2010, and followed the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) methodology to assess the quality of the scientific data on which the recommendations were based. These recommendations were then validated during a national review by 40 national experts. RESULTS The fertility work-up is recommended to be prescribed according to the woman's age: after one year of infertility before the age of 35 and after 6months after the age of 35. A couple's initial infertility work-up includes a single 3D ultrasound scan with antral follicle count, assessment of tubal permeability by hysterography or HyFOSy, anti-Mullerian hormone assay prior to assisted reproduction, and vaginal swabbing for vaginosis. If the 3D ultrasound is normal, hysterosonography and diagnostic hysteroscopy are not recommended as first-line procedures. Chlamydia trachomatis serology does not have the necessary performance to predict tubal patency. Post-coital testing is no longer recommended. In men, spermogram, spermocytogram and spermoculture are recommended as first-line tests. If the spermogram is normal, it is not recommended to check the spermogram. If the spermogram is abnormal, an examination by an andrologist, an ultrasound scan of the testicles and hormonal test are recommended. Based on the data in the literature, we are unable to recommend a BMI threshold for women that would contraindicate medical management of infertility. A well-balanced Mediterranean-style diet, physical activity and the cessation of smoking and cannabis are recommended for infertile couples. For fertility concern, it is recommended to limit alcohol consumption to less than 5 glasses a week. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormalities, ovulation induction is not recommended for normo-ovulatory women. If intrauterine insemination is indicated based on an abnormal infertility work-up, gonadotropin stimulation and ovulation monitoring are recommended to avoid multiple pregnancies. If the infertility work-up reveals no abnormality, laparoscopy is probably recommended before the age of 30 to increase natural pregnancy rates. In the case of hydrosalpinx, surgical management is recommended prior to ART, with either salpingotomy or salpingectomy depending on the tubal score. It is recommended to operate on polyps>10mm, myomas 0, 1, 2 and synechiae prior to ART. The data in the literature do not allow us to systematically recommend asymptomatic uterine septa and isthmoceles as first-line surgery. CONCLUSION Based on strong agreement between experts, we have been able to formulate updated recommendations in 28 areas concerning the initial management of infertile couples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Sonigo
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Antoine-Béclère, 157, rue de la Porte-Trivaux, 92140 Clamart, France; Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Geoffroy Robin
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation et préservation de la fertilité, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Florence Boitrelle
- Service de biologie de la reproduction, préservation de fertilité, CECOS, CHI de Poissy, Poissy, France; INRAe, ENVA, BREED, UVSQ, université Paris Saclay, Jouy-en Josas, France
| | - Eloïse Fraison
- Département médecine de la reproduction, CHU Lyon, hôpital Femme-Mère-Enfant, 59, boulevard Pinel, 69500 Bron, France
| | - Nathalie Sermondade
- Service de biologie de la reproduction CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France; Inserm US938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Emmanuelle Mathieu d'Argent
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Pierre-Emmanuel Bouet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Charlotte Dupont
- Service de biologie de la reproduction - CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Creux
- Centre AMP, polyclinique Saint-Roch, 550, avenue du Colonel-André-Pavelet, 34070 Montpellier cedex, France
| | - Maeliss Peigné
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Jean-Verdier-Béclère, avenue du 14-Juillet, Bondy, France
| | - Olivier Pirrello
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Sabine Trombert
- Laboratoire Cerba, 6-11, rue de l'Équerre, 95310 Saint-Ouen L'Aumône, France
| | - Emmanuel Lecorche
- Laboratoire Cerba, 6-11, rue de l'Équerre, 95310 Saint-Ouen L'Aumône, France
| | - Ludivine Dion
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine - CECOS, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Service de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle, site Bicêtre, hôpitaux Paris Sud, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris Sud, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Service hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, imagerie par résonance magnétique médicale et multimodalités, CNRS UMR8081, université Paris Sud, 4, place du Gal-Leclerc, 91401 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Emmanuel Arama
- Service de radiologie diagnostique et interventionnelle, site Bicêtre, hôpitaux Paris Sud, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Université Paris Sud, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Service hospitalier Frédéric-Joliot, imagerie par résonance magnétique médicale et multimodalités, CNRS UMR8081, université Paris Sud, 4, place du Gal-Leclerc, 91401 Orsay cedex, France
| | - Valérie Bernard
- Service de chirurgie gynécologique, gynécologie médicale et médecine de la reproduction, centre Aliénor d'Aquitaine, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France
| | - Margaux Monnet
- Département de gynécologie médicale, maternité régionale de Nancy, hôpitaux universitaires de Nancy, Nancy, France
| | - Laura Miquel
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | - Eva Birsal
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France
| | | | - Ingrid Plotton
- Service d'hormonologie, endocrinologie moléculaire et maladies rares, CPBE, groupement hospitalier Lyon-Est, Lyon-Bron, France; Université Claude-Bernard, Lyon 1, Lyon, France; Unité Inserm 1208, Lyon, France
| | - Célia Ravel
- Département de gynécologie-obstétrique et reproduction humaine - CECOS, hôpital Sud, CHU de Rennes, 16, boulevard de Bulgarie, 35000 Rennes, France
| | - Véronika Grzegorczyk-Martin
- Centre d'assistance médicale à la procréation et de préservation de la fertilité, clinique Mathilde, 76100 Rouen, France
| | - Éric Huyghe
- Département d'urologie, hôpital de Rangueil, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Service de médecine de la reproduction, hôpital Paule-de-Viguier, CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse, France; Inserm 1203, UMR DEFE, université de Toulouse, université de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Hugo G A Dupuis
- Service d'urologie et d'andrologie, CHU - hôpitaux de Rouen, CHU Charles-Nicolle, 76031 Rouen, France
| | - Tiphaine Lefebvre
- Service de médecine et biologie de la reproduction - gynécologie médicale, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Florence Leperlier
- Service de médecine et biologie de la reproduction - gynécologie médicale, centre hospitalier universitaire de Nantes, 38, boulevard Jean-Monnet, 44093 Nantes, France
| | - Léna Bardet
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Imane Lalami
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et de médecine de la reproduction, grand hôpital de l'Est Francilien - site de Meaux, 6-8, rue Saint-Fiacre, 77100 Meaux, France
| | - Camille Robin
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation et préservation de la fertilité, CHU de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Virginie Simon
- Unité fonctionnelle de gynécologie endocrinienne, service de gynécologie médicale, orthogénie et sexologie, hôpital Jeanne-de-Flandre, CHU de Lille, avenue Eugène-Avinée, 59037 Lille cedex, France
| | - Laura Dijols
- Service de médecine de la reproduction et préservation de la fertilité, hôpital Bretonneau, CHU de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Justine Riss
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Antoine Koch
- Service d'aide médicale à la procréation, centre médicochirurgical obstétrique (CMCO), CHU de Strasbourg, 19, rue Louis-Pasteur, 67303 Schiltigheim, France
| | - Clément Bailly
- Service de biologie de la reproduction CECOS, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, Sorbonne université, 75020 Paris, France; Inserm US938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne université, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Constance Rio
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalier universitaire d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49000 Angers, France
| | - Marine Lebret
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU Charles-Nicolle, 37, boulevard Gambetta, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Margaux Jegaden
- Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Département de chirurgie gynécologique et obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, GHU-Sud, AP-HP, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Hervé Fernandez
- Faculté de médecine, université Paris-Sud Saclay, 63, rue Gabriel-Péri, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Département de chirurgie gynécologique et obstétrique, hôpital Bicêtre, GHU-Sud, AP-HP, 78, rue du Général-Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Jean-Luc Pouly
- Service de gynécologie chirurgicale, CHU Estaing, 1, place Lucie-et-Raymond-Aubrac, 63003 Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Antoine Torre
- Centre d'assistance médicale à la procréation clinicobiologique, centre hospitalier Sud Francilien Corbeil-Essonnes, 40, avenue Serge-Dassault, 91106 Corbeil-Essonnes, France
| | - Joëlle Belaisch-Allart
- Service de médecine de la reproduction, pôle Femme-Enfant, Centre hospitalier des 4 villes, rue Charles-Lauer, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Jean-Marie Antoine
- Service de gynécologie-obstétrique et médecine de la reproduction, Dmu Origyne, hôpital Tenon, GHU Sorbonne université, AP-HP, 4, rue de la Chine, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Blandine Courbiere
- Service d'assistance médicale à la procréation, pôle Femmes-Parents-Enfants, hôpital de la Conception, AP-HM, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France; IMBE, CNRS, IRD, Aix-Marseille université, Avignon université, Marseille, France.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bourrion B, Panjo H, François M, Pelletier-Fleury N. Trends in clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins use in women with infertility between 2010 and 2017: A population-based study in France. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2023; 32:845-854. [PMID: 36935527 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe temporal trends and assess factors associated with changes in the prescription of clomiphene citrate and gonadotropins between 2010 and 2017 in women with infertility aged 18-50 from metropolitan France. METHODS 6321 prevalent women from a representative sample of the national medico-administrative database were identified. We performed a Cochran-Armitage trend test and calculated the rate ratios. A Poisson regression was used to derive the incidence rate ratios, for each treatment class. RESULTS The prevalence rate and incidence rate of clomiphene citrate use significantly decreased by 20% (RR 0.80: 95% CI 0.71-0.90) and 23% (RR 0.77: 95% CI 0.66-0.89), respectively. Its initiation was higher in all age groups compared to the reference (18-24 years), with a downward gradient. It was also higher when the density of gynaecologists was higher and in disadvantaged areas. The prevalence rate and incidence rate of gonadotropin use increased by 11% (RR 1.11: 95% CI 1.01-1.22) and 33% (RR 1.33: 95% CI 1.14-1.55) respectively. Gonadotropin initiation was highest in the 31-35 age group, but it was also higher in the 25-30 and 36-40 age groups at a similar level (reference 18-24 years). Its initiation was higher when the density of gynaecologists was higher, but not associated with social deprivation. CONCLUSION Our results showed an increase in gonadotropin use for infertility treatment in France during the 2010-2017 period and a decrease in clomiphene citrate use. Further work should be undertaken to analyse the use of these drugs in relation to women's care pathways.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bastien Bourrion
- INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP, bâtiment 15/16 Inserm, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
- Département de Médecine Générale, UVSQ, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Henri Panjo
- INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP, bâtiment 15/16 Inserm, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
| | - Mathilde François
- INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP, bâtiment 15/16 Inserm, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
- Département de Médecine Générale, UVSQ, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé Simone Veil, Montigny le Bretonneux, France
| | - Nathalie Pelletier-Fleury
- INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, UVSQ, CESP, bâtiment 15/16 Inserm, Hôpital Paul Brousse, 16 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94807, Villejuif Cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo Q, Qin J, Wang H, Hu Y, Yang L, Mao T, Yi L, Liu W, Zeng Q, Qiu Y. Factors associated with spontaneous miscarriage risk in IUI treatment: A retrospectively cohort of 31,933 cycles. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 286:61-68. [PMID: 37209524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
To determine the factors associated with intrauterine insemination (IUI) miscarriages and reduce the IUI miscarriage rate, a retrospective study was performed by reviewing 31,933 IUI cycles from 2006 to 2018. The overall there were 14.50% clinical pregnancies, and 16.74% miscarriages. Logistic regression revealed the following three predictive variables: females aged ≥ 35 years (odds ratio [OR] = 2.131; p < 0.001), spontaneous miscarriage history (OR = 1.513; p = 0.005), and ovarian stimulation schemes such as clomiphene citrate (CC) (OR = 1.459; p = 0.003). The natural cycle led to a lower miscarriage rate for patients without spontaneous miscarriage history both for those over 35 years old (OR = 0.402; p = 0.034) and for those under 35 years old (OR = 0.806; p = 0.017). Gonadotropin (Gn) showed the lowest miscarriage rate for patients without abortion history, though no significant differences were found. Patients under 35 with a history of miscarriage were protected from miscarriage by using CC and Gn together (OR = 0.516; p = 0.032). No significant differences were found between various ovarian protocols when patients with abortion history were aged ≥ 35 years (p = 0.606). CC + Gn showed the lowest miscarriage rate. In conclusion, the natural cycle could be suggested for infertility couples to minimize abortion risk. When ovarian induction is required, CC + Gn had the lowest miscarriage rate for women with a history of spontaneous miscarriage while Gn is more successful for individuals without such a history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiongxiu Luo
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Jiaying Qin
- Translational Center for Stem Cell Research, Tongji Hospital, Department of Regenerative Medicine, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai, PR China
| | - Huan Wang
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Yinyan Hu
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Lan Yang
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Taifeng Mao
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Ling Yi
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Wenyan Liu
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China
| | - Qiao Zeng
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China.
| | - Yu Qiu
- Jiangxi province Ji'an Women and Child Health care Hospital (Children's Hospital), Ji'an, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu L, Sun J, Wang Q, Yu W, Wang A, Zhu S, Xu W, Wang X. Ovulation induction drug and ovarian cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res 2023; 16:22. [PMID: 36694251 PMCID: PMC9872323 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-022-01084-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 12/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the association between ovulation induction drugs and ovarian cancer. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. SETTING Not applicable. PATIENT(S) Women without ovarian cancer who ever or never underwent ovarian induction. INTERVENTION(S) An extensive electronic search of the following databases was performed: PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and CNKI, from inception until January 2022. A total of 34 studies fulfilled our inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) and random-effects model were used to estimate the pooled effects. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the quality of included studies. Funnel plots and Egger tests were used to assess publication bias. MAIN OUTCOMES New diagnosed borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) and invasive ovarian cancer (IOC) between ovulation induction (OI) group and control (CT) group considering fertility outcome, OI cycles and specific OI drugs. RESULTS Primarily, there was no significant difference in the incidence of IOC and BOT between the OI and CT groups. Secondly, OI treatment did not increase the risk of IOC and BOT in the multiparous women, nor did it increase the risk of IOC in the nulliparous women. However, the risk of BOT appeared to be higher in nulliparous women treated with OI treatment. Thirdly, among women exposed to OI, the risk of IOC and BOT was higher in nulliparous women than in multiparous women. Fourthly, the risk of IOC did not increase with increasing OI cycles. Lastly, exposure to specific OI drugs also did not contribute to the risk of IOC and BOT. CONCLUSION Overall, OI treatment did not increase the risk of IOC and BOT in most women, regardless of OI drug type and OI cycle. However, nulliparous women treated with OI showed a higher risk of ovarian cancer, necessitating their rigorous monitoring and ongoing follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liang Yu
- grid.89957.3a0000 0000 9255 8984The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Jiafan Sun
- grid.89957.3a0000 0000 9255 8984The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Qiqin Wang
- grid.89957.3a0000 0000 9255 8984The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Wennian Yu
- grid.89957.3a0000 0000 9255 8984The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Anqi Wang
- grid.89957.3a0000 0000 9255 8984The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, The First Clinical Medical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Shu Zhu
- grid.412676.00000 0004 1799 0784Department of Gynecology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,The first clinical medical college of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Wei Xu
- grid.412676.00000 0004 1799 0784Department of Gynecology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,The first clinical medical college of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China
| | - Xiuli Wang
- grid.412676.00000 0004 1799 0784Department of Gynecology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,The first clinical medical college of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029 China ,grid.412676.00000 0004 1799 0784Department of Gynecology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210036 China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang X, Sun Q, Tang X, Li M, Zhou C, Cheng X, Yao B, Chen L. Factors Influencing the Pregnancy Outcome of Intrauterine Insemination and Follow-up Treatment. J Hum Reprod Sci 2023; 16:42-49. [PMID: 37305770 PMCID: PMC10256937 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_130_22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2022] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Many factors were reported associated with the pregnancy rate of intrauterine insemination (IUI), which played key role is still debated. Aims The aim of this study was to explore related clinical pregnancy outcome factor in IUI cycles of non-male factor. Settings and Design The clinical data of 1232 IUI cycles in 690 couples experiencing infertility who attended the Reproductive Center of Jinling Hospital between July 2015 and November 2021 were retrospectively analysed. Materials and Methods Female and male age, body mass index (BMI), anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), male semen parameters before and after wash, endometrial thickness (EMT), artificial insemination timing and ovarian stimulation (OS) protocols were compared between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group in order to explore any correlation. Statistical Analysis Used Continuous variables were analysed using independent-samples t-test, and Chi-square test was used for comparison of measurement data between the two groups. P <0.05 was considered statistical significance. Results There were statistically significant differences in female AMH, EMT and duration of OS between the two groups. The AMH was higher in the pregnant group than in the non-pregnant group (P < 0.01), the stimulated days was significantly longer (P < 0.05) and EMT was significantly greater (P < 0.01) in the pregnant group than in the non-pregnant group. Further analysis showed that when patients with IUI had the following conditions: AMH > 4.5 ng/ml, EMT between 8 and 12 mm and letrozole + human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation with higher clinical pregnancy. However, there were no differences between the pregnant group and the non-pregnant group amongst the female and male age, BMI, hormones on baseline and day of human chorionic gonadotrophin, number of ovulated oocytes, sperm parameters before and after wash, treatment protocols and the timing of IUI (P > 0.05). Furthermore, there were 240 couples who not pregnant received one or more cycles of in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection/ pre-implantation genetic technology treatment, and another 182 couples forgo follow-up treatment. Conclusion The results of the present study demonstrate that the clinical IUI pregnancy rate is correlated with the factors of female AMH, EMT and OS protocol; more studies and samples are necessary to evaluate whether other factors affect pregnancy rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Huang
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Qin Sun
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xu Tang
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Meiling Li
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Cheng Zhou
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Xi Cheng
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Bing Yao
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| | - Li Chen
- Center of Reproductive Medicine, Jinling Hospital, Clinical School of Medical College, Nanjing University, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shingshetty L, Maheshwari A, McLernon DJ, Bhattacharya S. Should we adopt a prognosis-based approach to unexplained infertility? Hum Reprod Open 2022; 2022:hoac046. [PMID: 36382011 PMCID: PMC9662706 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoac046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of unexplained infertility is a contentious topic that continues to attract a great deal of interest amongst clinicians, patients and policy makers. The inability to identify an underlying pathology makes it difficult to devise effective treatments for this condition. Couples with unexplained infertility can conceive on their own and any proposed intervention needs to offer a better chance of having a baby. Over the years, several prognostic and prediction models based on routinely collected clinical data have been developed, but these are not widely used by clinicians and patients. In this opinion paper, we propose a prognosis-based approach such that a decision to access treatment is based on the estimated chances of natural and treatment-related conception, which, in the same couple, can change over time. This approach avoids treating all couples as a homogeneous group and minimizes unnecessary treatment whilst ensuring access to those who need it early.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laxmi Shingshetty
- Aberdeen Centre for Reproductive Medicine, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Abha Maheshwari
- Aberdeen Centre for Reproductive Medicine, NHS Grampian, Aberdeen, UK
| | - David J McLernon
- Medical Statistics Team, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zippl AL, Wachter A, Rockenschaub P, Toth B, Seeber B. Predicting success of intrauterine insemination using a clinically based scoring system. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2022; 306:1777-1786. [PMID: 36069921 PMCID: PMC9519724 DOI: 10.1007/s00404-022-06758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To develop a predictive score for the success of intrauterine insemination (IUI) based on clinical parameters. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study evaluating the homologous IUI cycles performed at a single university-based reproductive medical center between 2009 and 2017. The primary outcome measure was pregnancy, defined as positive serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) 12–14 days after IUI. Predictive factors for pregnancy after IUI were identified, and a predictive score was developed using a multivariable continuation ratio model. Results Overall, 1437 IUI cycles in 758 couples were evaluated. We found a per cycle pregnancy rate of 10.9% and a cumulative pregnancy rate of 19.4%. In a multivariable analysis, the probability of pregnancy was negatively associated with female age ≥ 35 years (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41–0.97, p = 0.034), endometriosis, unilateral tubal factor, or anatomical alteration (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33–0.89, p = 0.016), anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) < 1 ng/ml (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.29–0.87, p = 0.014), and total progressive motile sperm count (TPMSC) < 5 mil (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.19–0.72, p = 0.004). We developed a predictive clinical score ranging from 0 to 5. Following 3 cycles, couples in our cohort with a score of 5 had a cumulative probability of achieving pregnancy of nearly 45%. In contrast, couples with a score of 0 had a cumulative probability of only 5%. Conclusion IUI success rates vary widely depending on couples’ characteristics. A simple to use score could be used to estimate a couple’s chance of achieving pregnancy via IUI, facilitating individualized counseling and decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Lena Zippl
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Alfons Wachter
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Bettina Toth
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Beata Seeber
- Department of Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Prevention of multiple pregnancies in gonadotropin-insemination cycles. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2022; 34:101-106. [PMID: 35645007 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Although elective single embryo transfer has significantly reduced, the rate of multiple pregnancy in IVF cycles, this rate is still relatively high in gonadotropin-insemination cycles. Patients who fail to ovulate or to conceive with oral agents and have constraints for IVF are usually candidates for gonadotropin injections. The current review article provides an up-to-date summation of the different strategies that can be adopted to reduce the risk of multiple pregnancies in gonadotropin-stimulated intrauterine insemination cycles. RECENT FINDINGS Gonadotropin-insemination treatments should be used judiciously by experienced providers. One should always start with the lowest effective gonadotropin dose (∼37.5 IU), monitor closely the ovarian response, and consider cycle cancellation or conversion to IVF whenever a high response is encountered. Therefore, every infertility practice should define its own cancellation and 'rescue IVF' criteria depending on the number of mature ovarian follicles and the age of the female partner. SUMMARY These preventive measures amongst others should mitigate the risk of multiple pregnancies that can arise from gonadotropin-insemination cycles.
Collapse
|
10
|
Multiple gestation associated with infertility therapy: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril 2022; 117:498-511. [PMID: 35115166 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
This Committee Opinion provides practitioners with suggestions to reduce the likelihood of iatrogenic multiple gestation resulting from infertility treatment. This document replaces the document of the same name previously published in 2012 (Fertil Steril 2012;97:825-34 by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine).
Collapse
|
11
|
Wessel JA, Danhof NA, van Eekelen R, Diamond MP, Legro RS, Peeraer K, D’Hooghe TM, Erdem M, Dankert T, Cohlen BJ, Thyagaraju C, Mol BWJ, Showell M, van Wely M, Mochtar MH, Wang R. OUP accepted manuscript. Hum Reprod Update 2022; 28:733-746. [PMID: 35587030 PMCID: PMC9434229 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmac021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrauterine insemination with ovarian stimulation (IUI-OS) is a first-line treatment for unexplained infertility. Gonadotrophins, letrozole and clomiphene citrate (CC) are commonly used agents during IUI-OS and have been compared in multiple aggregate data meta-analyses, with substantial heterogeneity and no analysis on time-to-event outcomes. Individual participant data meta-analysis (IPD-MA) is considered the gold standard for evidence synthesis as it can offset inadequate reporting of individual studies by obtaining the IPD, and allows analyses on treatment–covariate interactions to identify couples who benefit most from a particular treatment. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE We performed this IPD-MA to compare the effectiveness and safety of ovarian stimulation with gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC and to explore treatment–covariate interactions for important baseline characteristics in couples undergoing IUI. SEARCH METHODS We searched electronic databases including MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, and PsycINFO from their inception to 28 June 2021. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IUI-OS with gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC among couples with unexplained infertility. We contacted the authors of eligible RCTs to share the IPD and established the IUI IPD-MA Collaboration. The primary effectiveness outcome was live birth and the primary safety outcome was multiple pregnancy. Secondary outcomes were other reproductive outcomes, including time to conception leading to live birth. We performed a one-stage random effects IPD-MA. OUTCOMES Seven of 22 (31.8%) eligible RCTs provided IPD of 2495 couples (62.4% of the 3997 couples participating in 22 RCTs), of which 2411 had unexplained infertility and were included in this IPD-MA. Six RCTs (n = 1511) compared gonadotrophins with CC, and one (n = 900) compared gonadotrophins, letrozole and CC. Moderate-certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins increased the live birth rate compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.12–1.51, I2 = 26%). Low-certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins may also increase the multiple pregnancy rate compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.33–3.54, I2 = 69%). Heterogeneity on multiple pregnancy could be explained by differences in gonadotrophin starting dose and choice of cancellation criteria. Post-hoc sensitivity analysis on RCTs with a low starting dose of gonadotrophins (≤75 IU) confirmed increased live birth rates compared to CC (5 RCTs, 1457 women, RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.05–1.51), but analysis on only RCTs with stricter cancellation criteria showed inconclusive evidence on live birth (4 RCTs, 1238 women, RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.94–1.41). For multiple pregnancy, both sensitivity analyses showed inconclusive findings between gonadotrophins and CC (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.45–1.96; RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.32–2.03, respectively). Moderate certainty evidence showed that gonadotrophins reduced the time to conception leading to a live birth when compared to CC (6 RCTs, 2058 women, HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15–1.63, I2 = 22%). No strong evidence on the treatment–covariate (female age, BMI or primary versus secondary infertility) interactions was found. WIDER IMPLICATIONS In couples with unexplained infertility undergoing IUI-OS, gonadotrophins increased the chance of a live birth and reduced the time to conception compared to CC, at the cost of a higher multiple pregnancy rate, when not differentiating strategies on cancellation criteria or the starting dose. The treatment effects did not seem to differ in women of different age, BMI or primary versus secondary infertility. In a modern practice where a lower starting dose and stricter cancellation criteria are in place, effectiveness and safety of different agents seem both acceptable, and therefore intervention availability, cost and patients’ preferences should factor in the clinical decision-making. As the evidence for comparisons to letrozole is based on one RCT providing IPD, further RCTs comparing letrozole and other interventions for unexplained infertility are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J A Wessel
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N A Danhof
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R van Eekelen
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M P Diamond
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, USA
| | - R S Legro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - K Peeraer
- UZ Leuven, Leuven University Fertility Center, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - T M D’Hooghe
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt 64293, Germany
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven/University of Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - M Erdem
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara 06560, Turkey
| | - T Dankert
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 06560 Ankara, The Netherlands
| | - B J Cohlen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Fertility Center, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - C Thyagaraju
- Department of OBG, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry 605006, India
| | - B W J Mol
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
- Aberdeen Centre for Women’s Health Research, School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen AB24 3FX, UK
| | - M Showell
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, Auckland 1142, New Zealand
| | - M van Wely
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Mochtar
- Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction and Development Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R Wang
- Correspondence address. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Level 5, Monash Medical Centre, 246 Clayton Road, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia. E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Prieto B, Diaz-Nuñez M, Lainz L, Vendrell A, Rabanal A, Iglesias M, Jauregui T, Corcostegui B, Matorras A, Perez S, Matorras R. Aspiration of excess follicles before intrauterine insemination in high response cycles. Reprod Med Biol 2022; 21:e12470. [PMID: 35781922 PMCID: PMC9241166 DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To assess the outcome of excess follicle aspiration before intrauterine insemination (EFABI) in intrauterine insemination (IUI) cycles with 4-6 follicles ≥14 mm. Methods A retrospective case-control study with 1559 patients undergoing IUI (donor and husband's sperm), of whom 86 underwent EFABI. We studied also an historical series of 2213 patients before EFABI implementation. For 3.5 years, all women undergoing IUI developing 4-6 follicles ≥14 mm were offered EFABI on the day of hCG administration. Pregnancy rates (PRs), multiple PRs, and adverse effects were measured. Results EFABI was associated with a similar multiple PR (17.8% vs 17.5% in non-EFABI cases), with no triplets in EFABI patients. Live birth rates were significantly higher in EFABI cycles in IUI overall (25.5% vs 15.2%). When considered separately, the performance of EFABI resulted in significantly increased live birth rates in IUI-donor cycles (32.5% vs 18.5%), whereas the differences in IUI-husband cycles (19.5% vs 12.9%) did not reach statistical significance. The PR was 21.2% during the EFABI implementation period and 19.4% in the pre-EFABI period. Conclusions EFABI in cycles in which 4-6 follicles reach ≥14 mm is a simple option that reduces cycle cancellation rates, results in higher PRs than cycles with 1-3 follicles, and lowers the risk of multiple pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Begoña Prieto
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Faculty of Medicine University of the Basque Country Lejona Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain.,Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI) Leioa Spain
| | - Maria Diaz-Nuñez
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain
| | - Lucia Lainz
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain
| | | | - Aintzane Rabanal
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Faculty of Medicine University of the Basque Country Lejona Spain
| | - Maria Iglesias
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain
| | - Teresa Jauregui
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain
| | | | - Ana Matorras
- European University of Madrid Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid Spain
| | - Silvia Perez
- Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain
| | - Roberto Matorras
- Human Reproduction Unit Cruces University Hospital Barakaldo Spain.,Faculty of Medicine University of the Basque Country Lejona Spain.,Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute Barakaldo Spain.,Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI) Leioa Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cantineau AE, Rutten AG, Cohlen BJ. Agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination (IUI) in ovulatory women with infertility. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 11:CD005356. [PMID: 34739136 PMCID: PMC8570324 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd005356.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intrauterine insemination (IUI), combined with ovarian stimulation (OS), has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for infertile couples. Several agents for ovarian stimulation, combined with IUI, have been proposed, but it is still not clear which agents for stimulation are the most effective. This is an update of the review, first published in 2007. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of agents for ovarian stimulation for intrauterine insemination in infertile ovulatory women. SEARCH METHODS We searched the Cochrane Gynaecology and Fertility Group trials register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and two trial registers from their inception to November 2020. We performed reference checking and contacted study authors and experts in the field to identify additional studies. SELECTION CRITERIA We included truly randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different agents for ovarian stimulation combined with IUI for infertile ovulatory women concerning couples with unexplained infertility. mild male factor infertility and minimal to mild endometriosis. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures recommended by Cochrane. MAIN RESULTS In this updated review, we have included a total of 82 studies, involving 12,614 women. Due to the multitude of comparisons between different agents for ovarian stimulation, we highlight the seven most often reported here. Gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens (13 studies) For live birth, the results of five studies were pooled and showed a probable improvement in the cumulative live birth rate for gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens (odds ratio (OR) 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05 to 1.79; I2 = 30%; 5 studies, 1924 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is assumed to be 22.8%, the chance following gonadotropins would be between 23.7% and 34.6%. The pooled effect of seven studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 1.58, 95% CI 0.60 to 4.17; I2 = 58%; 7 studies, 2139 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus anti-oestrogens (8 studies) One study reported live birth rates for this comparison. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (OR 0.75, CI 95% 0.51 to 1.11; 1 study, 599 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following anti-oestrogens is 23.4%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.5% and 25.3%. The results of pooling four studies revealed that we are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.28, CI 95% 0.61 to 2.68; I2 = 0%; 4 studies, 1000 participants; low-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone) agonist versus gonadotropins alone (4 studies) No data were available for live birth. The pooled effect of two studies revealed that we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH agonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared to gonadotropins alone (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.82 to 7.86; I2 = 0; 2 studies, 264 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist versus gonadotropins alone (14 studies) Three studies reported live birth rate per couple, and we are uncertain whether gonadotropins with GnRH antagonist improve live birth rate compared to gonadotropins (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.52 to 4.39; I2 = 81%; 3 studies, 419 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 25.7%, the chance following gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist would be between 15.2% and 60.3%. We are also uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with GnRH antagonist lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 2.28; I2 = 0%; 10 studies, 2095 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins with anti-oestrogens versus gonadotropins alone (2 studies) Neither of the studies reported data for live birth rate. We are uncertain whether gonadotropins combined with anti-oestrogens lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate compared with gonadotropins alone, based on one study (OR 3.03, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.1; 1 study, 230 participants; low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors versus gonadotropins (6 studies) Two studies revealed that aromatase inhibitors may decrease live birth rate compared with gonadotropins (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.71; I2=0%; 2 studies, 651 participants; low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following gonadotropins alone is 31.9%, the chance of live birth following aromatase inhibitors would be between 13.7% and 25%. We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors compared with gonadotropins lead to a higher multiple pregnancy rate (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.06 to 8.17; I2=77%; 3 studies, 731 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Aromatase inhibitors with gonadotropins versus anti-oestrogens with gonadotropins (8 studies) We are uncertain whether aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins improve live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.3 8 to 2.54; I2 = 69%; 3 studies, 708 participants; very low-certainty evidence). This suggests that if the chance of a live birth following anti-oestrogens plus gonadotropins is 13.8%, the chance following aromatase inhibitors plus gonadotropins would be between 5.7% and 28.9%. We are uncertain of the effect of aromatase inhibitors combined with gonadotropins compared to anti-oestrogens combined with gonadotropins on multiple pregnancy rate (OR 1.31, 95% CI 0.39 to 4.37; I2 = 0%; 5 studies, 901 participants; low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Based on the available results, gonadotropins probably improve cumulative live birth rate compared with anti-oestrogens (moderate-certainty evidence). Gonadotropins may also improve cumulative live birth rate when compared with aromatase inhibitors (low-certainty evidence). From the available data, there is no convincing evidence that aromatase inhibitors lead to higher live birth rates compared to anti-oestrogens. None of the agents compared lead to significantly higher multiple pregnancy rates. Based on low-certainty evidence, there does not seem to be a role for different combined therapies, nor for adding GnRH agonists or GnRH antagonists in IUI programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid Ep Cantineau
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Ben J Cohlen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Isala Clinics, Zwolle, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fedotcheva TA. Clinical Use of Progestins and Their Mechanisms of Action: Present and Future (Review). Sovrem Tekhnologii Med 2021; 13:93-106. [PMID: 34513071 PMCID: PMC8353691 DOI: 10.17691/stm2021.13.1.11] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
This review summarizes the current opinions on the mechanisms of action of nuclear, mitochondrial, and membrane progesterone receptors. The main aspects of the pharmacological action of progestins have been studied. Data on the clinical use of gestagens by nosological groups are presented. Particular attention is paid to progesterone, megestrol acetate, medroxyprogesterone acetate due to broadening of their spectrum of action. The possibilities of using gestagens as neuroprotectors, immunomodulators, and chemosensitizers are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T A Fedotcheva
- Senior Researcher, Research Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, 1 Ostrovitianova St., Moscow, 117997, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Tokgoz VY, Sukur YE, Ozmen B, Sonmezer M, Berker B, Aytac R, Atabekoglu CS. Clomiphene Citrate versus Recombinant FSH in intrauterine insemination cycles with mono- or bi-follicular development. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:383-389. [PMID: 33746515 PMCID: PMC8312288 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The present study aims to assess the success of controlled ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles stimulated by recombinant-FSH and Clomiphene citrate for either mono- or bi-follicular development. Methods: We assessed 870 infertile patients treated with controlled ovarian stimulation in intrauterine insemination cycles at a university-based infertility clinic between January 2012 and December 2017. We compared the cycles stimulated by clomiphene citrate and recombinant-FSH in two set-ups; mono- and bi-follicular development. The main outcome measure was the clinical pregnancy rate per cycle. Results: The demographic and cycle parameters were similar between the groups, except for endometrial thickness on the day of hCG administration, which was higher in the recombinant-FSH group than the clomiphene citrate group. The overall clinical pregnancy rates in clomiphene citrate and recombinant-FSH groups were 9.8% and 10.3%, respectively (p=0.940). Regarding the entire cohort, clinical pregnancy was significantly higher in cases of bi-follicular development when compared to mono-follicular development (16.8% vs. 10.2%, respectively; p=0.009). Conclusions: Clomiphene citrate and recombinant-FSH have similar success rates in terms of clinical pregnancy, in either mono-follicular development or bi-follicular development. Clomiphene citrate and recombinant-FSH cycles resulted in comparable rates of bi-follicular development, which significantly increases clinical pregnancy rate. Clomiphene citrate and recombinant-FSH have similar success rates in terms of clinical pregnancy, in either mono-follicular development or bi-follicular development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vehbi Yavuz Tokgoz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine, Eskisehir, Turkey
| | - Yavuz Emre Sukur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Batuhan Ozmen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Murat Sonmezer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bulent Berker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Rusen Aytac
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cem Somer Atabekoglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tang Y, He QD, Zhang TT, Wang JJ, Huang SC, Ye Y. Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021; 19:45. [PMID: 33740990 PMCID: PMC7977560 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Some studies have stated that intrauterine insemination (IUI) with controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) might increase the pregnancy rate, while others suggest that IUI in the natural cycle (NC) should be the first line of treatment. It remains unclear whether it is necessary to use COS at the same time when IUI is applied to treat isolated male factor infertility. Thus, we aimed to investigate efficacy of IUI with COS for isolated male factor infertility. METHODS A total of 601 IUI cycles from 307 couples who sought medical care for isolated male factor infertility between January 2010 and February 2020 were divided into two groups: NC-IUI and COS-IUI. The COS-IUI group was further divided into two subgroups according to the number of pre-ovulatory follicles on the day of HCG: cycles with monofollicular development (one follicle group) and cycles with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles (≥ 2 follicles group). The IUI outcomes, including clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, ectopic pregnancy, and multiple pregnancy rates were compared. RESULTS The clinical pregnancy, live birth, spontaneous abortion, and ectopic pregnancy rates were comparable between the NC-IUI and COS-IUI group. Similar results were also observed among the NC-IUI, one follicle, and ≥ 2 follicles groups. However, with respect to the multiple pregnancy rate, a trend toward higher multiple pregnancy rate was observed in the COS-IUI group compared to the NC-IUI group (8.7% vs. 0, P = 0.091), and a significant difference was found between the NC-IUI and ≥ 2 follicles group (0 vs. 16.7%, P = 0.033). CONCLUSION In COS cycles, especially in those with at least two pre-ovulatory follicles, the multiple pregnancy rate increased without a substantial gain in overall pregnancy rate; thus, COS should not be preferred in IUI for isolated male factor infertility. If COS is required, one stimulated follicle and one healthy baby should be the goal considering the safety of both mothers and foetuses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Tang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Qian-Dong He
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Ting-Ting Zhang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Wang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Si-Chong Huang
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Yun Ye
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Zhongshan City People's Hospital, No. 2, Sunwen East Road, Shiqi District, Zhongshan, 528400, Guangdong Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bahadur G, Woodward B, Carr M, Acharya S, Muneer A, Homburg R. IUI needs fairer appraisal to improve patient and stakeholder choices. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:162-164. [PMID: 33118714 PMCID: PMC7863108 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Information supporting IVF at the expense of intrauterine insemination (IUI) has become commonplace, but it lacks critical analyses. Data from poorly practiced IUI, without an equivalent comparison to IVF, has been generalised to recommend a total abandonment of IUI in favour of IVF treatment. Our intention with this paper is to reappraise and balance arguments so that patients and stakeholders can have an unbiased informed choice. We provide information that reveals IUI to predominate over IVF in terms of integrated success, risks and cost to deliver one live birth whilst obviating the maternal and neonatal costs. Exceptional cost savings are demonstrated for IUI over IVF for fee-paying agencies and patients with lowered risks of maternal and neonatal care along with other risks including OHSS, fetal reduction and termination of pregnancies. This analysis supports the view that patients and stakeholders can choose IUI instead of IVF in most instances, except with bilateral tubal blockage and severe male factor infertility. It is apparent that fertility clinics need to re-evaluate and reconsider this field, and IUI can be of benefit to both subfertile patients and the stakeholders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulam Bahadur
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, North Middlesex University Hospital, Old Admin Block, London N18 1QX, UK
| | | | - Megan Carr
- Chelsea Westminster Hospital/West Middlesex Hospital University Trust, Twickenham Road, Isleworth TW7 6AF
| | - Santanu Acharya
- Ayrshire Fertility Unit, University Hospital Cross house, Kilmarnock, KA2 0BE, Scotland
| | - Asif Muneer
- University College London Hospital, 250 Euston Road. London NW1 2PG
| | - Roy Homburg
- Homerton Fertility Centre, Homerton University Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pundir J, Achilli C, Bhide P, Sabatini L, Legro RS, Rombauts L, Teede H, Coomarasamy A, Zamora J, Thangaratinam S. Risk of foetal harm with letrozole use in fertility treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 2020; 27:474-485. [PMID: 33374012 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aromatase inhibitor letrozole is increasingly recommended for ovulation induction, as it is more effective with fewer side-effects than other agents. But many clinicians are reluctant to use the drug for fertility treatment due to a strong-label warning against its use, which warns about congenital malformation risk to the foetus in women seeking pregnancy. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to determine the risks of congenital malformations and pregnancy loss with letrozole compared with clomiphene primarily, and with other fertility drugs and natural conception. SEARCH METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis using PRISMA harms guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources from inception until January 2020, with the MeSH words for 'letrozole' and pregnancy OR foetal/neonatal outcome. We included studies reported on congenital malformations in foetuses born to mothers conceived after fertility treatment, with letrozole versus clomiphene, placebo, gonadotrophins, metformin, natural conception or other agents, from randomised trials, comparative cohort studies and non-comparative observational cohorts. Quality of the studies was assessed using Cochrane risk of bias tool and Newcastle Ottawa Scale. The McMaster tool was used to assess the quality of reported harm for foetal congenital malformations in the studies. We compared the absolute risk of events using risk difference measures and pooled the findings using a fixed-effect model. We evaluated the statistical heterogeneity using forest plots and the I2 statistic and funnel plot to assess publication bias. We assessed the strength of evidence for congenital malformation and pregnancy loss as per the GRADE recommendations and with the Fragility index. OUTCOMES We included 46 studies (18 randomised trials; 21 comparative cohorts; 7 non-comparative cohorts). Overall 2.15% (101/4697; 95% CI 1.7 to 2.5) of babies conceived on letrozole for fertility treatment had congenital foetal malformations. We did not observe a significant increase in congenital malformations with letrozole versus clomiphene in the randomised trials (risk difference (RD) 0.01, 95% CI -0.02, 0.03; I2 = 0%; 14 studies) and found a significant reduction in the cohort studies (RD -0.02, 95% CI -0.04, -0.01; I2 = 0%, 11 studies). The fragility index was 44% (7/16) (either an increase in the intervention arm or a decrease in control arm was needed to alter the results). The risks of pregnancy loss were not increased with letrozole versus clomiphene in the 14 randomised trials (RD -0.01, 95% CI -0.06, 0.04; I2 = 0%), and the risks were reduced in the six cohort studies (RD -0.09, 95% CI -0.17, -0.00; I2 = 68%). The GRADE quality of evidence was low to moderate for congenital malformations and pregnancy loss. We did not find any increased congenital malformation risk with letrozole versus gonadotrophins, natural conception or natural cycle ART, but the number of studies was small. WIDER IMPLICATIONS There is no evidence that letrozole increases the risk of congenital foetal malformation or pregnancy loss compared with clomiphene, natural conception or other fertility agents, to warrant warning against its use. Given its therapeutic benefits and lack of evidence of harm to the foetus, clinicians should consider letrozole as first-line agent for ovulation induction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyotsna Pundir
- Queen Mary University, London E1 4NS, UK.,Centre for Reproductive Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Chiara Achilli
- Hewitt Fertility Centre, Liverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool L8 7SS, UK
| | - Priya Bhide
- Centre for Women's Health, Queen Mary University of London, E1 2AB, UK.,Homerton University Hospital, London E9 6SR, UK
| | - Luca Sabatini
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London EC1A 7BE, UK
| | - Richard S Legro
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Penn State University College of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Helena Teede
- Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Monash University, Clayton, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Arri Coomarasamy
- Tommy's National Centre for Miscarriage Research, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK.,Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Javier Zamora
- CIBER Epidemiology and Public Health, Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Ramon y Cajal Ctra, Madrid 28034, Spain.,Women's Health Research Unit, Queen Mary University of London
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
In vitro fertilization is indicated for infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) after unsuccessful treatment with ovulation induction agents or in women deemed high-risk of multiple gestations who are ideal candidates for single embryo transfers. PCOS patients are at increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; therefore, attention should be made in the choice of in vitro fertilization treatment protocol, dose of gonadotropin utilized, and regimen to achieve final oocyte maturation. Adopting these strategies in addition to close monitoring may significantly reduce the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome risk. Future developments may improve pregnancy outcomes and decrease complications in PCOS women undergoing fertility treatment.
Collapse
|
20
|
The Evaluation of the Effect of ICT in HIV Prevention in the General Population in China Based on an Information-Motivation-Behavioral Skill Model. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2020; 2020:8786467. [PMID: 33178835 PMCID: PMC7644314 DOI: 10.1155/2020/8786467] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Objectives With an increase in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection, the application of information and communication technology (ICT) is considered as a helpful solution. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of ICT in HIV prevention in the general population based on an information-motivation-behavioral skill (IMB) model. Methods A national follow-up study on the evaluation of ICT on HIV health education effects before and after large sample intervention was conducted in 16 provinces of China. ICT was used to carry out a six-month educational program on the prevention of HIV for participants using the WeChat platform. The research group conducted a second questionnaire for participants to collect data and built the IMB model using Mplus 7.0 analysis software. Results A total of 997 questionnaires were sent, and 957 effective questionnaires were recovered, a recovery rate of 96.0%. Before the ICT intervention, the scores of information was 15.68 ± 3.28, of motivation was 14.47 ± 4.26, of behavior skills was 2.26 ± 1.08, and of condom use was 2.19 ± 1.15. After the ICT intervention, the scores for information (18.54 ± 2.48), motivation (16.06 ± 4.11), behavior skills (4.74 ± 1.04), and condom use (2.64 ± 1.15) improved significantly. ICT use had a significant regression effect on motivation (β = 0.237, P < 0.001), behavior skills (β = 0.997, P < 0.001), and information (β = 0.441, P < 0.001), while motivation (β = 0.196, P < 0.001), behavior skills (β = 0.207, P < 0.001), and information (β = 0.092, P < 0.001) had a significant regression effect on condom use. Conclusions The ICT intervention can not only improve information about HIV prevention, motivation, and behavior skills but also promote the use of condoms, so as to achieve the result of promoting behaviors that act to prevent AIDS within the general population.
Collapse
|
21
|
Bovbjerg ML, Misra D, Snowden JM. Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2020. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs 2020; 49:605-619. [PMID: 33096044 PMCID: PMC7575432 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogn.2020.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of diversity in the maternity care workforce and commentaries on reviews focused on burnout in midwifery and a cross-national comparison of guidelines for uncomplicated childbirth.
Collapse
|
22
|
Carpinello OJ, Jahandideh S, Yamasaki M, Hill MJ, Decherney AH, Stentz N, Moon KS, Devine K. Does ovarian stimulation benefit ovulatory women undergoing therapeutic donor insemination? Fertil Steril 2020; 115:638-645. [PMID: 33077237 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.1430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2020] [Revised: 08/19/2020] [Accepted: 08/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare clinical and ongoing pregnancy after natural cycle (NC) intrauterine insemination (IUI) versus ovarian stimulation (OS) IUI in ovulatory women undergoing therapeutic donor insemination (TDI). DESIGN Retrospective cohort. SETTING Single infertility center. PATIENT(S) A total of 76,643 IUI cycles in patients treated with intrauterine insemination were examined. Women undergoing TDI in the absence of diagnosed female factor infertility were included. INTERVENTION(S) NC TDI or OS TDI with either clomiphene citrate or letrozole. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Clinical and ongoing pregnancies were analyzed by generalized estimating equations adjusting for age, body mass index, total motile sperm at time of insemination and cycle number. Ongoing multiple gestations were examined as a secondary outcome. RESULT(S) Six thousand one hundred ninety-two TDI cycles from 2,343 patients (711 patients without repeated IUI cycles) met inclusion criteria and were available for analysis (3,837 NC and 2,355 OS). There was no difference in mean age between the two groups (NC, 34.2 years vs. OS, 34.3 years). Probability of clinical and ongoing pregnancy was higher in the OS cohort compared with the NC cohort (OS, 22.4% vs. NC, 18.7% and OS, 15.4% vs. NC, 14.9%, respectively). However, OS significantly increased ongoing multiple gestations (OS, 10.8% vs. NC, 2.4%). CONCLUSION(S) Ovarian stimulation in TDI cycles resulted in a <4% increase in clinical and <1% increase in ongoing pregnancy, and more than fourfold increase in ongoing multiple gestations. Natural cycle IUI should be considered as a first-line treatment for ovulatory women who need donor insemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia J Carpinello
- Program in Reproductive Endocrinology and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | | | - Meghan Yamasaki
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Micah J Hill
- Program in Reproductive Endocrinology and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Alan H Decherney
- Program in Reproductive Endocrinology and Gynecology, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Linara-Demakakou E, Bodri D, Wang J, Arian-Schad M, Macklon N, Ahuja K. Cumulative live birth rates following insemination with donor spermatozoa in single women, same-sex couples and heterosexual patients. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:1007-1014. [PMID: 33046376 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 08/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION What is the cumulative live birth rate (LBR) following donor intrauterine insemination (IUI-D) treatment in a large, retrospective, single-centre cohort of single women, same-sex couples and heterosexual patients? DESIGN Outcomes from 8922 treatments performed in 3333 consecutive women (45% single, 43% from same-sex and 12% from heterosexual couples) were analysed in a 13-year retrospective study from a private, HFEA-regulated UK centre between January 2004 and December 2016. RESULTS A total of 795 live births resulted in an overall delivery rate of 8.9% per cycle, including 24 (3%) twins. Age-specific crude and expected cumulative LBR calculated in four age groups (<35, 35-37, 38-39 and 40-42 years) were 29, 23, 21, 12% and 66, 49, 54, 28%, respectively. A plateau was reached after six cycles, beyond which there were few additional live births. There was no significant difference in cumulative LBR between single women and same-sex couples. In a multivariate analysis, female age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-0.93; P < 0.0001), previous live birth following IUI-D (aOR 2.15; 95% CI 1.69-2.73; P < 0.0001) and mild stimulation (aOR 1.27; 95% CI 1.09-1.48; P = 0.02) had a significant effect on outcome, but relationship status or cycle rank did not. CONCLUSIONS These results indicate there is little benefit performing more than six cycles of IUI-D in all women up to 40 years old, including those from same-sex relationships, while only three attempts seem reasonable in those aged 40-42 years. These results do not reflect current clinical guidelines in the UK. The authors found that consecutive IUI cycles, especially with mild stimulation, were an efficient treatment in all indications.
Collapse
|
24
|
Bergh C, Kamath MS, Wang R, Lensen S. Strategies to reduce multiple pregnancies during medically assisted reproduction. Fertil Steril 2020; 114:673-679. [PMID: 32826048 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Multiple birth rates after fertility treatment are still high in many countries. Multiple births are associated with increased rates of preterm birth and low birth weight babies, in turn increasing the risk of severe morbidity for the children. The multiple birth rates vary in different countries between 2% and 3% and up to 30% in some settings. Elective single-embryo transfer, particularly in combination with frozen-embryo transfer and milder stimulation in ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination, to avoid multifollicular development is an effective strategy to decrease the multiple birth rates while still achieving acceptable live-birth rates. Although this procedure is used successfully in many countries, it ought to be implemented broadly to improve the health of the children. One at a time should be the normal routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Clinical Science, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Mohan S Kamath
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | - Rui Wang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Sarah Lensen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Hansen KR. Gonadotropins with intrauterine insemination for unexplained infertility-time to stop? Fertil Steril 2020; 113:333-334. [PMID: 32106982 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.10.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/21/2019] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Karl R Hansen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma College of Medicine, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|