The chances of obtaining a euploid embryo and subsequent live birth remain consistent with national age-based rates after an in vitro fertilization cycle that produced only aneuploid embryos

Lessons learned from 64,071 embryos subjected to PGT for aneuploidies: results, recurrence pattern and indications analysis

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the influence of biological, technical and clinical factors on embryo outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) and what is the recurrence pattern?

DESIGN

This retrospective study included 64,071 embryos undergoing PGT-A in the same laboratory between 2011 and 2019. Biopsies were performed at the day 3 embryo stage (48.32%) or blastocyst stage (51.70%). Advanced maternal age (AMA) was the main indication (65.62%).

RESULTS

The aneuploidy rate was 67.75%, higher in women aged over 35 years than in women aged 35 years or less (71.76% versus 47.44%), and higher in day 3 embryo versus blastocyst biopsies (77.51% versus 58.62%). The trisomy:monosomy ratio was 1.01 for blastocysts versus 0.84 for day 3 embryos. Trisomy 21 was present in 4.9% of embryos. In aneuploid embryos, the probability of having one or more involved chromosomes followed a decreasing exponential pattern. The probability of an embryo being euploid was constant at around 30% (40% in blastocysts, 20% in day 3 embryos). The cumulative probability of having one or more euploid embryos after 10 biopsied embryos was 94.79% in blastocysts and 80.61% in day 3 embryos. AMA was associated with a much higher aneuploidy rate than all other indications, which among them had similar aneuploidy rate and chromosomal involvement.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a considerably lower aneuploidy rate in blastocysts than day 3 embryos, which is most notable for monosomies. While AMA shows an increased aneuploidy rate and a specific chromosomal pattern of involvement, the remaining indications showed a similar aneuploidy rate and chromosomal pattern. Even after producing many consecutive aneuploid embryos, the possibility of obtaining a euploid embryo is not negligible.

Correlations between clinical parameters, blastocyst morphological classification and embryo euploidy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to evaluate clinical and embryo parameters to predict embryo ploidy.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we studied 838 biopsied day-5 blastocysts from 219 patients in the period from May 2021 to July 2022. All embryos were morphologically classified before biopsy and were divided into two groups according to genetic test results. Euploid embryos (299) were compared with aneuploid embryos (539) based on maternal age, anti-Mullerian hormone, antral follicle count, and embryo morphology.

RESULTS

Maternal age (36.2±3.0) of euploid embryos was lower than maternal age (37.1±2.5) of aneuploid embryos (p<0.0001). AMH levels were higher (3.9±1.2) in the group of euploid embryos than in the group of aneuploid embryos (3.6±1.3, p<0.0001). However, the AFC was not different in the group of euploid embryos (15.3±6.0) compared to the group of aneuploid embryos (14.5±5.9, p=0.07). The presence of aneuploidy was negatively correlated with top embryo quality (embryos 4AA and 4AB). All euploid embryos (299) were top quality versus 331 of 539 (61.49%) aneuploid embryos (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that euploid embryos were associated with lower maternal age, higher AMH levels, and higher quality embryos.

Bologna vs. POSEIDON criteria as predictors of the likelihood of obtaining at least one euploid embryo in poor ovarian response: an analysis of 6,889 cycles

OBJECTIVE

To study the likelihood of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo for transfer in poor ovarian response (POR) diagnosed per Bologna and Patient-Oriented Strategies Encompassing IndividualizeD Oocyte Number (POSEIDON) criteria, and compare it between groups and with patients without POR.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENTS

Women undergoing an ovarian stimulation cycle with intention to pursue preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.

INTERVENTIONS

Bologna criteria and the POSEIDON classification system were applied to characterize each stimulation cycle as POR or not. Cycles identified as POR by POSEIDON were subdivided into groups I, II, III, and IV as defined by this classification system.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The proportion of cycles resulting in at least 1 euploid blastocyst. Other outcome measures included cycle yields (metaphase II oocytes, fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and euploid blastocysts), and euploidy rate per embryo cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 6,889 cycles were included, of which 3,653 (53.0%) were classified as POR per POSEIDON criteria: 1.5% (100/6,889) in group I, 3.2% (222/6,889) in II, 11.9% (817/6,889) in III, and 36.5% (2,514/6,889) in IV. Per Bologna criteria, 23.4% (1,612/6,889) of cycles were classified as POR. Group I had similar likelihood of obtaining at least 1 euploid embryo (97.0%; 95% confidence interval, 91.5%-99.2%) as cycles not deemed POR (91.9%; 95% confidence interval, 90.9%-2.8%), whereas this decreased significantly with each subsequent POSEIDON group (II: 77.9%, 72.0%-82.9%; III: 70.5%, 67.3%-73.5%; IV: 44.8%, 42.9%-46.7%) and those meeting Bologna criteria had the lowest rates (31.9%, 29.7%-34.3%). Cycle yields correlated with ovarian reserve testing results, whereas euploidy rates were associated with age.

CONCLUSIONS

Although younger POSEIDON groups (I and III) have higher euploidy rates than older groups (II and IV), each incremental POSEIDON group poses a higher risk of having no euploid blastocysts; with POSEIDON I being no different from non-POSEIDON, and Bologna having the worst prognosis. Although ovarian reserve appears to have little impact on euploidy rates, it remains a key prognostic factor for having at least 1 euploid embryo available for transfer through its impact on oocyte yield. To our knowledge, this is the first study to provide the odds ratio of this outcome depending on the degree of POR.

Progesterone: The Key Factor of the Beginning of Life

Progesterone is the ovarian steroid produced by the granulosa cells of follicles after the LH peak at mid-cycle. Its role is to sustain embryo endometrial implantation and ongoing pregnancy. Other biological effects of progesterone may exert a protective function in supporting pregnancy up to birth. Luteal phase support (LPS) with progesterone is the standard of care for assisted reproductive technology. Progesterone vaginal administration is currently the most widely used treatment for LPS. Physicians and patients have been reluctant to change an administration route that has proven to be effective. However, some questions remain open, namely the need for LPS in fresh and frozen embryo transfer, the route of administration, the optimal duration of LPS, dosage, and the benefit of combination therapies. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the uterine and extra-uterine effects of progesterone that may play a role in embryo implantation and pregnancy, and to discuss the advantages of the use of progesterone for LPS in the context of Good Medical Practice.