The investigation of a relative contrast index model for fingerprint quantification

Quantifying contrast of latent fingerprints developed by fluorescent nanomaterials based on spectral analysis

Fluorescent nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to develop latent fingerprints with enhanced contrast. However, a method for quantifying the contrast is still lacking, making it impossible to achieve quantitative comparison in the contrast enhancement between different fingerprint developing agents. Here we proposed a new method to quantify the developed contrast using two indexes when fluorescent NPs were used to develop the latent fingerprint. One is the intensity index (I) defined as the ratio between the integrated fluorescence intensities of the signal and background in the fluorescence spectra of the developed fingerprint. Another is the chroma index (C) determined from the color difference between developed fingerprints and their substrates in the chromaticity graph. We defined the developed contrast as the product of the chroma index and the common logarithm of the intensity index (C·lg I), and validated this method using both down- and up-conversion fluorescent NPs and on a variety of different substrates (glass, marble, red paper and money). We showed that the developed contrast quantified by our method effectively reflected the true contrast but the intensity or chroma index alone was not always effective. This work opens up a new avenue to quantifying and enhancing the developed contrast.

A simple computer-assisted quantification of contrast in a fingerprint

A simple method for quantification of contrast in a fingerprint is proposed. Contrast is defined as the average difference in intensity of pixels between valleys and ridges in a fingerprint. It is quantified from a scanner-acquired image of the fingerprint using a histogram function of Adobe Photoshop. The method was validated with black inked prints and marks developed with aluminum powder. Moreover, we tested resistance of the method to rater-dependent errors and dependence of the measurements on the resolution of an image and the model of the scanner. For both groups of fingerprints, the method gave coherent and easily interpretable quantitative values for contrast. There were no significant differences between measurements performed by different raters and by the same rater in a test-retest procedure. However, the method was found to be instrument dependent, as measurements were significantly affected by image resolution and the model of the scanner.