Determination of safety margins for whole blood concentrations of alcohol and nineteen drugs in driving under the influence cases

The relationship between clinical impairment and blood drug concentration: Comparison between the most prevalent traffic relevant drug groups

AIM

The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between blood concentrations of four different drug classes; ethanol, benzodiazepines, amphetamines and tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and driver impairment as assessed by a clinical test of impairment (CTI).

METHODS

Data was retrieved from a national database on CTI assessments and accompanying blood drug concentrations from apprehended drivers. All drug concentrations in blood were quantified using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), and compared to the results of the CTI which were categorized as either "not impaired", "mildly impaired", "moderately impaired", or "considerably impaired".

RESULTS

A total number of 15 514 individual mono drug-cases collected over 9 years was included. 89 % were men and the median age was 34 years. In addition, 3 684 individual cases with similar age and gender distribution where no drugs were detected, were included as a reference group. For ethanol and benzodiazepines the percentage of clinically impaired cases increased markedly from lower to higher concentration windows, from 60 % to 97 % for ethanol and from 38 % to 76 % for benzodiazepines. The corresponding increase for amphetamines and THC was modest, from 43 % to 58 % for amphetamines and from 41 % to 55 % for THC. The correlation between drug concentration and degree of impairment was high for ethanol (Spearman´s rho=0.548, p<0.001) and relatively high for benzodiazepines (Spearman´s rho=0.377, p<0.001), but low for amphetamines (Spearman´s rho=0.078, p<0.001) and THC (Spearman´s rho=0.100, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The percentage of impaired drivers increased with increasing blood drug concentration for all four drug classes, most pronounced for ethanol and benzodiazepines and much less for amphetamines and THC. The median blood drug concentration increased with increasing magnitude of impairment for ethanol and benzodiazepines, while this was much less pronounced for amphetamines and THC. The ranges of drug concentrations, however, were wide for all four drug classes in all impairment categories as assessed by individual clinical examination.

Driving under the influence of zopiclone: Elimination between two consecutive blood samples

AIM

Zopiclone is a widely used hypnotic drug which is frequently detected in apprehended drivers. For assessments in forensic cases, the elimination half-life (t1/2) of a drug is sometimes important. A t1/2 of 3.5-6.5 h for zopiclone is previously reported in healthy individuals, but different factors like age and drug-interactions can affect the t1/2 of zopiclone. The aim of this study was to describe concentrations of zopiclone and co-ingestion of additional drugs in apprehended drivers, and to investigate the t1/2 of zopiclone based on two consecutive blood samples.

METHODS

Data was collected from apprehended drivers in Norway between 2003 and 2021. All cases where zopiclone was detected were included. In a subset of the material, two consecutive whole blood samples were collected ≥ 20 and < 60 min apart. Concentrations of zopiclone in blood were determined by LC-MS or UHPLC-MS/MS. The elimination and t1/2 of zopiclone was estimated from the concentration change of zopiclone and the time interval between the two consecutive blood samples, under the assumption of first order kinetics.

RESULTS

The median concentration among all zopiclone positive cases was 0.044 mg/L (IQR 0.070 mg/L) (n = 2401). The most frequent additional drugs detected were ethanol (36%), diazepam (22%), amphetamine (14%) and THC (14%). In zopiclone-only cases (n = 364), the median concentration of zopiclone was 0.066 mg/L (IQR 0.115 mg/L). In 112 cases, two consecutive blood samples were collected. Of these, 28 cases showed increasing concentrations of zopiclone between the two sampling time points. Among the cases in which the concentration decreased (n = 84), the median C1 was 0.048 mg/L (IQR 0.062 mg/L) and the median C2 was 0.043 mg/L (IQR 0.056 mg/L). A Bayesian statistical model was used to obtain the posterior distribution of t1/2. The posterior median of t1/2 was estimated to 3.1 h (IQR=0.39 h) when including only the cases showing decreasing concentrations, and this increased to 3.8 h (IQR=0.52 h) when also including samples showing non outlying increase in concentrations. There was no statistically significant gender difference in the calculated half-lives (two-sided Mann-Whitney U test, p = .525).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that zopiclone is frequently detected in apprehended drivers in supra therapeutic concentrations and poly drug cases. The elimination of zopiclone in blood from two consecutive blood samples indicated an apparent t1/2 of between 3.1 and 3.8 h, which is within the lower range of what previous experimental studies on healthy individuals have reported.

Review of LC techniques for determination of methadone and its metabolite in the biological samples

Methadone (MTD) is a synthetic analgesic drug used for treating opioid dependence and effectively used clinically for patients with severe pain. The abuse of MTD may lead to poisoning, disorder in the central nervous system and even death. The regular monitoring of MTD in biological matrices including serum, plasma and urine samples is an effective way to control abuse of MTD. In this manner, the selection of analytical monitoring of MTD in biological matrices is of paramount importance. This study was conducted to review high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) techniques carried out on MTD and its main metabolite 2-ethylidene-1,5-dimethyl-3,3-diphenylpyrrolidine (EDDP) in the biological samples during 2015-June 2021.

Quantitative Determination of Ethyl Glucuronide and Ethyl Sulfate in Postmortem and Antemortem Whole Blood Using Phospholipid Removal 96-Well Plate and UHPLC-MS-MS

Postmortem ethanol formation is a well-known problem in forensic toxicology. Ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulfate (EtS) are ethanol metabolites that can be used to distinguish antemortem alcohol intake from postmortem formation of ethanol and in addition can be a helpful tool in assessment of the hip-flask defense. To an aliquot of 100 µL whole blood, internal standard (IS) and water was added before protein precipitation treatment (PPT) with ice-cold acetonitrile (ACN). The supernatants were filtered through a 96-well phospholipid removal plate, evaporated to dryness and reconstituted in 150 µL water/ACN/formic acid (FA). Identification of compounds was performed using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) in negative mode. Gradient elution was performed on a C18 column with methanol (MeOH) and 0.1% FA. The run time was 4.5 min, and 0.5 µL was injected on an ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC–MS-MS) instrument. Linearity was achieved (coefficient of determination (R²) ≥ 0.999) for EtG in the range of 0.089 to 22 mg/L (0.40–100 µM) and EtS 0.025 to 6.3 mg/L (0.20–50 µM). The limit of quantification (LOQ) was 0.067 mg/L (0.30 µM) for EtG and 0.019 mg/L (0.15 µM) for EtS. Between assay accuracy was –15% to 8% and precision reported as relative standard deviation (RSD) was ≤ 4.5%. Precision, estimated as the RSD of the concentration difference between results from two independent analyses of authentic whole blood samples, was ≤ 6.7%. Recovery was ≥ 61% for EtG and ≥ 77% for EtS and matrix effects (ME) were 99% to 103%. Method comparison was carried out with a previously used UHPLC–MS-MS method, and satisfactory agreement was achieved, and external proficiency testing control samples had z-score < ± 1. The method has been used in routine work for more than 4 years analyzing about 6,000 antemortem and postmortem whole blood samples and has proven to be robust and reliable.

The implementation of per-se limits for driving under the influence of benzodiazepines and related drugs: No increased risk for arrest during therapeutic use in Norway

Objective: To investigate whether the use of recommended therapeutic doses of medicinal drugs has led to suspicion of driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) after implementation of legislative limits for illicit and medicinal drugs in 2012.Methods: Data from suspected drug-impaired drivers apprehended by the police from 2013 to 2015 were selected from the Norwegian Forensic Toxicology Database. The blood samples had been analyzed for benzodiazepines (BZDs), z-hypnotics, opioids, stimulants, certain hallucinogens, and alcohol. Drivers who tested positive for one BZD or a z-hypnotic only, were included in the study. Drug concentrations measured in their blood samples were compared to the maximal obtainable steady state concentrations if the drug had been used in accordance with the recommendations set by the Norwegian Directorate of Health.Results: BZDs or z-hypnotics were found in 10 248 samples, representing 59.6% of the total number of drivers arrested for suspected DUID (n = 17 201). Only one BZD or z-hypnotic with a blood drug concentration above the legislative limit was detected in 390 (2.3%) of the total number of samples. Clonazepam was the most frequently detected BZD (n = 4656), while as a single drug above the legislative limit, it was detected in only 3.6% (n = 168) of the clonazepam-positive blood samples. For drivers testing positive for only one z-hypnotic, drug concentrations above the legislative limit were found in 27% (n = 55) of the blood samples that tested positive for zolpidem and 12.4% (n = 53) of the samples that tested positive for zopiclone. In total, 155 subjects out of 10 248 testing positive for BZDs or z-hypnotics displayed concentrations above the legislative limit but within the concentration ranges that are expected when taking recommended therapeutic drug doses, and 77 below the legislativel limit.Conclusions: The results show that the implementation of legislative limits for BZDs and z-hypnotics may have contributed to DUID suspicion for a small group of patients using therapeutic drug doses; only 1.3% of the suspected DUID offenders had concentrations of only one of those drugs in-line with recommended therapeutic dosing.

Determination of 12 commonly found compounds in DUID cases in whole blood using fully automated supported liquid extraction and UHPLC-MS/MS

A high-throughput UHPLC-MS/MS method for the most frequently found compounds; tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDMA, clonazepam, diazepam, nordiazepam, oxazepam, alprazolam, nitrazepam, morphine, and codeine, in driving under the influence of drugs (DUID) cases in whole blood, is presented. Automated sample preparation by 96-well supported liquid extraction (SLE) plates with ethyl acetate + heptane (80 + 20, v/v) as organic solvent was carried out on a Freedom Evo 200 platform from Tecan. An aliquot of 100 μL whole blood was used. Sample preparation time for 96 samples was 1.5 h. Compounds were separated with gradient elution on a C₁₈ column (50 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) with a mobile phase consisting of 5 mM pH 10.2 ammonium formate and methanol. The run time was 4.5 min and 1 μL was injected on an Acquity UPLC I-Class system with a Xevo TQS tandem-quadrupole mass spectrometer in multiple-reaction monitoring mode (MRM) from Waters. Isotope labelled, ¹³C, internal standards (ISs) were used for all compounds except for alprazolam and morphine, which had deuterated analogs. Quantification was carried out with calibrators without whole blood matrix. Full validation was carried out according to international guidelines, and a new approach for evaluation of process efficiency (PE) has been presented. Linear or quadratic weighted (1/x) calibration curves were used with R² ≥ 0.999. The method showed satisfactory deviations ±16% when compared to the existing methods, and satisfactory agreement with proficiency testing control samples (z-score -1.6 to 1.8, n = 16 samples). The precision, estimated as the relative standard deviation (RSD) of the concentration difference between results from two independent analyses of authentic whole blood samples, was ≤7.2% in antemortem and ≤9.3% in postmortem samples. Recovery was ≥85% for all the compounds, except morphine ≥62% and THC ≥ 50%. PE was satisfactory for all the compounds with low variation in IS response, RSD ≤ 16% (THC 27%) in antemortem samples and ≤34% (THC 66%) in postmortem samples. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first automated 96-well SLE UHPLC-MS/MS method developed for the simultaneous determination of these 12 compounds in whole blood covering the concentration ranges found in forensic samples. The method has been used in routine work during the last ten months, analysing about 9900 antemortem and 1000 postmortem whole blood samples, and has proven to be robust and reliable.

Decreases in blood ethanol concentrations during storage at 4 °C for 12 months were the same for specimens kept in glass or plastic tubes

Background

The stability of ethanol was investigated in blood specimens in glass or plastic evacuated tubes after storage in a refrigerator at 4 °C for up to 12 months.

Methods

Sterile blood, from a local hospital, was divided into 50 mL portions and spiked with aqueous ethanol (10% w/v) to give target concentrations of 0.20, 1.00, 2.00 and 3.00 g/L. Ethanol was determined in blood by headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) with an analytical imprecision of <3% (coefficient of variation, CV%). Aliquots of blood were re-analysed after 2, 7, 14, 28, 91, 182 and 364 days of storage at 4 °C.

Results

The standard deviation (SD) of analysis by HS-GC was 0.0059 g/L at 0.20 g/L and 0.0342 g/L at 3.00 g/L, corresponding to CVs of 2.9% and 1.1%, respectively. The decreases in blood ethanol content were analytically significant after 14–28 days of storage for both glass and plastic tubes The mean (lowest and highest) loss of ethanol after 12 months storage was 0.111 g/L (0.084–0.129 g/L) for glass tubes and 0.112 g/L (0.088–0.140 g/L) for plastic tubes. The corresponding percentage losses of ethanol were 43–45% at a starting concentration of 0.20 g/L and 3.9–4.1% at 3.00 g/L.

Conclusion

The concentration of ethanol in blood gradually decreases during storage at 4 °C. After 12 months storage the absolute decrease in concentration was ~0.11 g/L when the starting concentration ranged from 0.20 to 3.0 g/L. Decreases in ethanol content were the same for specimens kept in glass or plastic evacuated tubes.