Technical note: Survey of extracellular and cell-pellet-associated DNA from 'touch'/trace samples

How to best assess shedder status: a comparison of popular shedder tests

"Shedder status" describes the inherent variation between individuals to leave touch DNA on a surface through direct contact. Depending on the amount and quality of DNA or cellular deposition, individuals are typically deemed high, intermediate, or low shedders. Although many shedder tests have been described, variability in study design and categorisation criteria has limited the ability of researchers to accurately compare results, as well as accrue the necessary population data. As activity level reporting becomes more common, the need for reliable and standardised testing increases. To assess reproducibility, this study compared shedder status data generated by six participants using three different shedder tests, as modified from the literature. This involved DNA quantification and profiling of a handprint made on a glass plate, DNA quantification and profiling of a grip mark made on a plastic conical tube, and cell scoring of a Diamond™ Dye-stained fingermark. All participants washed and dried their hands fifteen minutes before each deposit. To assess the impact of behaviour on shedder designation, participants either refrained from activity or went about their daily tasks during this wait. The shedder status of participants changed between tests, as DNA-based testing often generated lower shedder statuses than cell scores. Further, when different categorisation methods were applied to a single test, intra-person variability increased as the number of shedder designations increased from two (low/high) to five (low/low-intermediate/intermediate/intermediate-high/high). Moving forward, the utilisation of a single shedder test and standardised categorisation criteria is needed to employ shedder testing in forensic casework.

A synthetic fingerprint solution and its importance in DNA transfer, persistence and recovery studies

A review of the literature on DNA transfer and persistence highlights many difficulties that are encountered when conducting research of this nature. One of the main problems highlighted repeatedly in the literature is the prevalence of inherent uncontrolled variation that accompany these studies, and in turn, the results obtained. This work aims to decrease the amount of intrinsic variability associated with DNA transfer and persistence experiments using a realistic proxy solution which is adaptable, of known composition, reproducible, and capable of being standardised. This proxy is composed of three parts: a synthetic fingerprint solution, cellular DNA, and cell free DNA. In this proof-of-concept study the proxy was tested with a small-scale DNA transfer and recovery experiment and the data obtained suggests that the use of a solution that mimics real fingerprint secretions, over an alternative (such as buffer or a body fluid), is important when working with non-donor provided trace DNA samples. This is because the DNA deposit solution likely impacts the transfer of DNA from fingers/hands to a surface as well as the ability to recover the biological material once deposited.

Direct and Secondary Transfer of Touch DNA on a Credit Card: Evidence Evaluation Given Activity Level Propositions and Application of Bayesian Networks

In a judiciary setting, questions regarding the mechanisms of transfer, persistence, and recovery of DNA are increasingly more common. The forensic expert is now asked to evaluate the strength of DNA trace evidence at activity level, thus assessing if a trace, given its qualitative and quantitative features, could be the result of an alleged activity. The present study is the reproduction of a real-life casework scenario of illicit credit card use by a co-worker (POI) of its owner (O). After assessing the shedding propensity of the participants, differences in DNA traces' qualitative and quantitative characteristics, given scenarios of primary and secondary transfer of touch DNA on a credit card, a non-porous plastic support, were investigated. A case-specific Bayesian Network to aid statistical evaluation was created and discrete observations, meaning the presence/absence of POI as a major contributor in both traces from direct and secondary transfer, were used to inform the probabilities of disputed activity events. Likelihood Ratios at activity level (LRα) were calculated for each possible outcome resulting from the DNA analysis. In instances where only POI and POI plus an unknown individual are retrieved, the values obtained show moderate to low support in favour of the prosecution proposition.

Touch DNA Sampling Methods: Efficacy Evaluation and Systematic Review

Collection and interpretation of "touch DNA" from crime scenes represent crucial steps during criminal investigations, with clear consequences in courtrooms. Although the main aspects of this type of evidence have been extensively studied, some controversial issues remain. For instance, there is no conclusive evidence indicating which sampling method results in the highest rate of biological material recovery. Thus, this study aimed to describe the actual considerations on touch DNA and to compare three different sampling procedures, which were "single-swab", "double-swab", and "other methods" (i.e., cutting out, adhesive tape, FTA® paper scraping), based on the experimental results published in the recent literature. The data analysis performed shows the higher efficiency of the single-swab method in DNA recovery in a wide variety of experimental settings. On the contrary, the double-swab technique and other methods do not seem to improve recovery rates. Despite the apparent discrepancy with previous research, these results underline certain limitations inherent to the sampling procedures investigated. The application of this information to forensic investigations and laboratories could improve operative standard procedures and enhance this almost fundamental investigative tool's probative value.

Use of hormone-specific antibody probes for differential labeling of contributor cell populations in trace DNA mixtures

A significant proportion of casework analyzed by forensic science laboratories is often "touch" or trace forensic DNA evidence, which is deposited through physical contact and is comprised of sloughed epidermal cells. These samples can be challenging to analyze due to low DNA concentrations, frequent degradation, and the presence of cells from multiple individuals in the same sample. To address these challenges, we investigated a new approach for characterizing trace evidence prior to DNA profiling that labels epidermal cells with antibody probes targeting hormone molecules testosterone and dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The goal was to test whether cell populations derived from separate individuals showed different binding efficiencies to hormone probes and, thus, could be used to detect the presence of multiple cell populations. Additionally, we investigated whether antibody probes could be used to isolate contributor cell populations from an epidermal cell mixture and facilitate deconvolution of mixed DNA profiles recovered from touch/trace evidence. Results showed that cell populations from some individuals could differentiated in trace samples based on fluorescence histograms following probe labeling. However, certain pairs of contributors showed largely or completely overlapping histogram profiles and could not be resolved. Preliminary efforts to separate cell populations that could be differentiated with hormone probes with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) coupled to DNA profiling and probabilistic modeling indicated that it is possible to enrich contributor cell populations from touch/trace samples and produce more probative DNA profiles compared to the original mixture sample. The variability in labeling, differentiation, and physical separation of cell populations may be impacted by similarities in biochemical profiles across some contributors as well as imbalance of contributor DNA quantities in certain mixtures as is typical in casework involving touch/trace evidence. Ultimately, screening and separation of trace DNA samples with this approach may be presumptive and constrained by sample-specific parameters of the original mixture.

Technical Note: Lysis and purification methods for increased recovery of degraded DNA from touch deposit swabs

Touch deposits are a routine yet challenging sample type in forensic casework and research. Recent work investigating their contents has indicated corneocytes to be the major cellular constituent while cell-free DNA is present at significant levels. Prolonged incubation including a reducing agent such as DTT has been shown to lyse corneocytes; a plasma cfDNA recovery kit which targets shorter DNA fragments has been demonstrated to improve cfDNA recovery from hand rinses. Herein these methods are combined and tested on mock casework touch deposit swabs from communal surface areas. Both fluorescence- and qPCR-based quantification methods are used and their results compared to query DNA degradation levels. Both proposed lysis and purification methods demonstrate increased recovery of DNA detectable with fluorescence quantification and some additional alleles at short loci, indicating high levels of fragmented DNA in these samples.

DNA Transfer in Forensic Science: Recent Progress towards Meeting Challenges

Understanding the factors that may impact the transfer, persistence, prevalence and recovery of DNA (DNA-TPPR), and the availability of data to assign probabilities to DNA quantities and profile types being obtained given particular scenarios and circumstances, is paramount when performing, and giving guidance on, evaluations of DNA findings given activity level propositions (activity level evaluations). In late 2018 and early 2019, three major reviews were published on aspects of DNA-TPPR, with each advocating the need for further research and other actions to support the conduct of DNA-related activity level evaluations. Here, we look at how challenges are being met, primarily by providing a synopsis of DNA-TPPR-related articles published since the conduct of these reviews and briefly exploring some of the actions taken by industry stakeholders towards addressing identified gaps. Much has been carried out in recent years, and efforts continue, to meet the challenges to continually improve the capacity of forensic experts to provide the guidance sought by the judiciary with respect to the transfer of DNA.

Accumulation of endogenous and exogenous nucleic acids in "Touch DNA" components on hands

Successful forensic DNA profiling from handled items is increasingly routine in casework. This "touch DNA" is thought to contain both cellular and acellular nucleic acid sources. However, there is little clarity on the origins or characteristics of this material. The cellular component consists of anucleate, terminally differentiated corneocytes (assumed to lack DNA), and the occasional nucleated cell. The acellular DNA source is fragmentary, presumably cell breakdown products. This study examines the relative contributions each component makes to the hand-secretions (endogenous) and hand-accumulations (exogenous) by recovering rinses from the inside and outside of worn gloves. Additionally, cellular and acellular DNA was measured at timepoints up to 2 h after hand washing, both with and without interim contact. Microscopic examination confirmed cell morphology and presence of nucleic acids. Following the novel application of a hair keratinocyte lysis method and plasma-DNA fragment purification to hand rinse samples, DNA profiles were generated from both fractions. Exogenous cell-free DNA is shown to be a significant source of touch DNA, which reaccumulates quickly, although its amplifiable nuclear alleles are limited. Endogenous DNA is mostly cellular in origin and provides more allelic information consistently over time.