Developmental validation of a multiplex proteomic assay for the identification of forensically relevant biological fluids

Saliva identification in forensic samples by automated microextraction and intact mass analysis of statherin

The enzyme α-amylase has long been a commonly targeted protein in serological tests for saliva. While being especially abundant in saliva, α-amylase is detectable in vaginal secretions, sweat, fecal matter, breast milk and other matrices. As a result, assays for α-amylase only provide a presumptive indication of saliva. The availability of mass spectrometry-based tools for the detection of less abundant, but more specific, protein targets (e.g., human statherin) has enabled the development of high confidence assays for human saliva. Sample throughput, however, has traditionally been low due to multi-step workflows for protein extraction, quantitation, enzymatic digestion, solid phase cleanup, and nano-/capillary-based chromatography. Here, we present two novel "direct" single-stage extraction strategies for sample preparation. These feature immunoaffinity purification and reversed-phase solid-phase microextraction in conjunction with intact mass analysis of human statherin for saliva identification. Mass analysis was performed on the Thermo Scientific Q-Exactive™ Orbitrap mass spectrometer with a 10-min analytical run time. Data analysis was performed using Byos® from Protein Metrics. Two sample sets were analyzed with a population of 20 individuals to evaluate detection reliability. A series of casework-type samples were then assayed to evaluate performance in an authentic forensic context. Statherin was confidently identified in 92% and 71% of samples extracted using the immunoaffinity purification and solid phase microextraction approaches, respectively. Overall, immunoaffinity purification outperformed the solid phase microextraction, especially with complex mixtures. In toto, robotic extraction and intact mass spectrometry enable the reliable identification of trace human saliva in a variety of sample types.

One-step endpoint RT-PCR assays for confirmatory body fluid identification

Messenger RNA (mRNA) expression analysis is increasingly used in casework, in the form of multiplex two-step reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) assays such as CellTyper 2 (CT2), developed by the Institute of Environmental Science and Research (ESR). This paper presents the development of a one-step endpoint RT-PCR workflow to improve the efficiency and precision of confirmatory body fluid identification. A comparative study of commercial one-step RT-PCR kits was undertaken, with the highest performing kit (RNA to C_T) retained for further development. Sensitivity, specificity across body fluids, and precision was assessed simultaneously using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. An optimal RFU cut-off value which maximised sensitivity and specificity was determined for each marker. All assays performed significantly better when compared to the equivalent of a completely uninformative test (area under the curve of 0.5) for their target body fluid. Sensitivity varied between different donors, but the limit of detectionss were estimated as follows; saliva markers HTN3: 1 in 100 dilution of a whole buccal swab and FDCSP: 1 in 10 dilution of a whole buccal swab, circulatory blood marker SLC4A1: 0.1 µL blood, menstrual fluid markers STC1, MMP10: 1 in 10 dilution of a whole menstrual swab, spermatozoa markers PRM1, TNP1: 0.1 µL semen, seminal fluid markers KLK2: 0.1 µL semen and MSMB: 0.01 µL semen, and vaginal material marker CYP2B7P: 1 in 1000 dilution of a whole vaginal swab. The method successfully detected most body fluids in a range of simple mixtures with 77 out of 80 markers observed when expected. The developed one-step endpoint RT-PCR assays lack the sensitivity and precision required for forensic casework and provide little benefit when compared with standard two-step endpoint RT-PCR, other than minimal time and cost savings, similar sensitivity, and improved precision for some markers. As both methods utilise endpoint RT-PCR, they have the same narrow linear dynamic range. The novel method is therefore similarly susceptible to varied RNA input, a major disadvantage of this approach. The limited sensitivity and precision consistently encountered with endpoint RT-PCR - regardless of cDNA synthesis strategy - could be addressed by a real-time PCR approach.

High-throughput seminal fluid identification by automated immunoaffinity mass spectrometry

The identification of semen during a criminal investigation may be a critical component in the prosecution of a sexual assault. Commonly employed enzymatic and affinity-based methods for detection lack specificity, are time-consuming, and only provide a presumptive indication that semen is present where microscopic visualization is unable to meet the throughput demands. Contrary to traditional approaches, protein mass spectrometry provides true confirmatory results, but multiday sample preparation and nanoflow sample separation requirements have limited the practical applicability of these approaches. Aiming at streamlining sexual assault screening by mass spectrometry, the work here coupled a 60-minute rapid tryptic digestion, semenogelin-II peptide affinity purification on an Agilent AssayMap Bravo automation platform, and a 3-minute targeted LC-MS/MS method on an Agilent 6495 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer operating in multiple reaction monitoring mode for detecting semenogelin-II peptides in sexual assault samples. The developed assay was assessed using casework-type samples and was successful in detecting trace levels (0.0001 μl) of semen recovered from both cotton and vaginal swabs, as well as semen recovered from vaginal swabs during menses or adulterated with personal lubricants. This work represents a promising technique for high-throughput seminal fluid identification in sexual assault-type samples by mass spectrometry.

On the Identification of Body Fluids and Tissues: A Crucial Link in the Investigation and Solution of Crime

Body fluid and body tissue identification are important in forensic science as they can provide key evidence in a criminal investigation and may assist the court in reaching conclusions. Establishing a link between identifying the fluid or tissue and the DNA profile adds further weight to this evidence. Many forensic laboratories retain techniques for the identification of biological fluids that have been widely used for some time. More recently, many different biomarkers and technologies have been proposed for identification of body fluids and tissues of forensic relevance some of which are now used in forensic casework. Here, we summarize the role of body fluid/ tissue identification in the evaluation of forensic evidence, describe how such evidence is detected at the crime scene and in the laboratory, elaborate different technologies available to do this, and reflect real life experiences. We explain how, by including this information, crucial links can be made to aid in the investigation and solution of crime.