Eyelid and Periorbital Soft Tissue Trauma

Role of Dermatix in the Management of Eyelid Hypertrophic Scars After Facial Trauma

Facial trauma can cause skin wounds with uneven and discoloured edges that require healing by secondary intention. These wounds often produce excess collagen fibres, leading to fibrosis and hypertrophic scars that can cause discomfort and negatively impact the patient's quality of life. A man suffered facial trauma due to a motor vehicle accident, resulting in a fracture of the left zygomatic-maxillary complex. He underwent surgery to fix the fracture and reconstruct his eyelid but developed a hypertrophic scar during recovery that caused eye dryness and discomfort. To treat the scar, Dermatix silicone gel (SG) (Viatris, Canonsburg, PA) was applied twice a day. After two months of treatment, the scar had improved significantly, and the patient's eyelid function had also improved. This case describes the use of Dermatix SG to treat a patient with a traumatic hypertrophic scar of the eyelid associated with eyelid malposition. Silicone gel is a non-invasive treatment for scars and has been shown to be effective in reducing scar elevation and erythema. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the routine use of SG to preserve functionality and aesthetics in traumatic hypertrophic scars of complex anatomical structures. Further studies are needed to understand the principles of using SG for these types of scars to improve functional and aesthetic outcomes. Applying Dermatix SG twice a day for 60 days corrected a patient's functional and aesthetic issues. More studies should be conducted to investigate the product's effectiveness further.

Soft Tissue Trauma: Critical Recognition and Timing of Intervention in Emergency Presentations

The facial trauma surgeon will see a variety of facial injuries. Recognition of emergency cases and proper intervention is and this article aims to highlight those cases and the respective proper interventions.

Pediatric Eyelid and Canalicular Lacerations: Epidemiology and Outcomes

PURPOSE

To characterize the epidemiology of eyelid lacerations, identify risk factors for canalicular involvement, and describe postoperative complications following laceration repair.

METHODS

All patients undergoing eyelid laceration repair at a tertiary care, level I trauma center children's hospital from November 2010 to April 2021 were identified by a Current Procedural Terminology code search. Patient characteristics, surgical characteristics, and surgical outcomes were collected via chart review. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for canalicular involvement and postoperative complication.

RESULTS

A total of 165 patients were identified, of whom 136 had at least 1 week of follow-up and were further assessed for postoperative complications. The most common mechanisms of injury were dog bites (62, 38%), falls (33, 20%), and being struck by an object (22, 13%). Eyelid margin involvement was present in 108 patients (65%) and canalicular involvement in 77 patients (47%). Risk factors for canalicular involvement were hook-related injury, eyelid margin involvement, and lower eyelid injury. Thirty-three patients (24%) had postoperative complications, most commonly ptosis (7, 5%), premature stent loss (7, 5%), and eyelid margin notching (6, 4%). There was no association between postoperative complication and antibiotic use, delayed repair, or wound class.

CONCLUSIONS

Hook-related injury, eyelid margin involvement, and lower eyelid injury are risk factors for canalicular involvement. Postoperative complications of eyelid lacerations are generally minor and are not associated with perioperative factors. Close postoperative follow-up is needed to monitor for complication development. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(1):33-38.].

Preliminary Study of the Treatment Strategy for Retaining Traumatic Foreign Bodies Involving the Carotid Artery

PURPOSE

Craniomaxillofacial trauma is usually accompanied by indwelling foreign bodies, and some of those are close to the carotid artery, which increases the risks and difficulties of surgical treatment. The introduction of interventional radiology combined with image-guided surgical navigation may be a good solution for precise surgery to remove foreign bodies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Four patients were included in the study. All patients underwent digital subtraction angiography and enhanced computed tomography before surgery. The patients were divided into 3 categories (A, B, and C) according to the presence of carotid artery damage and its positional relationship with the foreign body, and 3 corresponding treatment strategies were developed. Treatments were completed using interventional radiology and surgical navigation systems.

RESULTS

All foreign bodies were completely removed, except for 1 remaining in the jugular foramen in a patient. The prognosis of all patients was good, and no systemic complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

The combined interventional radiology and surgical navigation method proposed in this study is an effective method to improve the accuracy and safety of foreign body removal surgery.

The Orbital Bones Protect the Globe From Sharp Periorbital Trauma Injuries

BACKGROUND

The bones of the orbit hold the globe and periocular structures and protect it and other periocular contents. This has been shown in blowout orbital fractures, as well as in high-energy injuries to the periorbital region. However, there is little information regarding how the orbital bones protect the globe after periorbital trauma from sharp objects.

OBJECTIVES

This study reports 4 cases of traumatic injury from sharp objects to the periorbital area and eyelids to demonstrate the protective features of the orbital bones.

RESULTS

The anatomy of the periorbital bones clearly protected the globe from direct trauma in all the 4 cases.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no harm to the orbit or visual impairment after the successful treatment with definitive surgery.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Imaging of Facial Trauma Following Primary Survey

Maxillofacial trauma patients comprise a significant subset of patients presenting to emergency departments. Before evaluating for facial trauma, an emergency or trauma physician must perform a primary survey to ensure patient stabilization. Following this primary survey, this document discusses the following clinical scenarios for facial trauma: tenderness to palpation or contusion or edema over frontal bone (suspected frontal bone injury); pain with upper jaw manipulation or pain overlying zygoma or zygomatic deformity or facial elongation or malocclusion or infraorbital nerve paresthesia (suspected midface injury); visible nasal deformity or palpable nasal deformity or tenderness to palpation of the nose or epistaxis (suspected nasal bone injury); and trismus or malocclusion or gingival hemorrhage or mucosal hemorrhage or loose teeth or fractured teeth or displaced teeth (suspected mandibular injury). The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

The Application of Tissue Glue in Eyelid Laceration Repair in Children During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic Lockdown in Wuhan

OBJECTIVE

To discuss a rapid and effective treatment used for children with eyelid lacerations during the COVID-19 lockdown in Wuhan to limit the risk of cross-infection.

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted of forty-five patients with eyelid lacerations who attended the Ophthalmology Department of Wuhan Children's Hospital between January 23, 2020 and March 6, 2020. The tissue glue Histoacryl was used to bond the wounds in 24 cases, while the traditional suture method was used for 21 cases. The wound healing time, complications, treatment satisfaction, and number of visits of the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The wound healing time (from wound disinfection to wound dressing) was shorter in the tissue glue group (4.35 ± 0.47min versus 11.71 ± 1.85 min, P< 0.01). There was 1 case of wound dehiscence in the tissue glue group. Twenty-two cases in the tissue glue group were satisfied, 2 cases were basically satisfied, and 0 were dissatisfied. Eleven cases in the traditional suture group were satisfied, 9 cases were basically satisfied, and 1 case was dissatisfied. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In terms of the number of visits, the tissue glue group visited (1.54 ± 0.88) times, while the traditional suture group visited (2.38 ± 0.59) times. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.01). The real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 of all medical staff in the ophthalmology emergency room were negative.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the traditional suture method, tissue glue used in eyelid laceration in children has the advantages of painlessness, shorter operation duration, higher safety and satisfaction, greater ease of care, and fewer hospital visits. Tissue glue can be widely used to reduce the risk of cross-infection.

Periorbital Soft Tissue Trauma

Eyelid trauma occurs across a broad spectrum of pathology, ranging from simple periorbital lacerations to severe, vision-threatening injuries requiring expert oculoplastic consultation. Any injury, no matter how benign, is also inherently cosmetically sensitive, further adding to the reconstructive challenge. In this review, we discuss the anatomy of the eyelid and develop an understanding of evaluating for signs of more serious, potentially occult, trauma. A framework is developed for approaching the patient with periorbital trauma to assess for injury and triage necessary treatments. Damage to the lacrimal drainage system, which can be particularly difficult to detect and repair, is specifically emphasized and explored.

Eyelid and orbital trauma for the primary care physician

Patients who experience trauma to the eyelid or the orbit may present to their primary care providers or directly to the emergency room for evaluation of their injuries. These patients will often be in pain and may have bleeding around the eye, which can make evaluation of these patients difficult. Many traumatic injuries to the eye require quick and immediate intervention. In this article, we will review the background, anatomy, exam and management of some of the most common eye traumas including eyelid lacerations, orbital hemorrhages, intraorbital foreign bodies, and orbital fractures.

Management outcomes of canalicular laceration in children

PURPOSE:

To report the epidemiological data, clinical profile, management, and outcomes of canalicular lacerations in the pediatric age group in a tertiary eye care hospital in Saudi Arabia.

METHODS:

This retrospective study evaluated pediatric patients who underwent canalicular laceration repair in the last 15 years at King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital (KKESH), Saudi Arabia. Demographics, causes of injury, type of trauma, surgical approach, and outcomes were analyzed. The success of repair was defined as the absence of epiphora after canaliculus repair with negative dye disappearance test (DDT). Success within subgroups was compared. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

The study sample was comprised of 43 patients, with a median age of 6.35 years (range, 1.77–17.96 years). Most of the patients were males (69.8%). Sharp objects were the most common cause of canalicular laceration (46.5%), being 9 (20.9 %) caused by a metallic clothing hanger. Lower canaliculus was involved in 65.1%, upper canaliculus in 32.6%, and both canaliculi in 2.3% of patients. Canaliculus repair was performed with a bicanalicular stent in 58.1 % and monocanalicular stent in 41.9 % of patients.The success rate and risk of complications using bicanalicular or monocanalicular stent did not differ (P = 0.065). Functional success was achieved in 87.5% of patients.

CONCLUSION:

Canalicular laceration is common in male children, mainly affecting the lower canaliculus. There was no difference in success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular stent. As canalicular laceration could be related to social determinants, the main causes should be highlighted in community health education initiatives.