Lower Jaw Recontouring in Facial Gender-Affirming Surgery

Functional and Cosmetic Considerations in Gender-Affirming Feminization Rhinoplasty

Gender-affirming facial surgery is increasing in prevalence, and rhinoplasty plays an integral role in its success. The nose displays considerable gender dimorphism, and maneuvers performed during gender-affirming rhinoplasty may differ considerably from those performed during cis-gender surgery. During feminization rhinoplasty in particular, cosmetic goals often rely on reductive techniques such as osteotomies, dorsal reduction, sidewall narrowing, tip narrowing, and alar base narrowing. These maneuvers collectively have important ramifications when considering the functional aspects of the nose. Herein, we outline the status of feminization rhinoplasty, and the interplay of cosmetic and functional considerations of the field.

Preoperative Radiology and Virtual Surgical Planning

Virtual surgical planning enables precise surgical planning and translation of this planning into the operating room. Preoperative maxillofacial computed tomography scans are compared to a reference skull to identify desired surgical changes. In facial feminization surgery, these include forehead recontouring/frontal table setback, gonial angle reduction, and possible chin repositioning/reshaping, while in facial masculinization surgery, this includes forehead augmentation and gonial angle/chin augmentation. Cutting and recontouring guides as well as custom implants are then custom manufactured. Common guides include osteotomy guides, depth drilling guides, ostectomy guides, and guides for one/two-piece genioplasty or chin burring. Common implants include mandibular and chin implants.

Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery: Lower Third of the Face

This article is intended to give the reader an overview of facial gender-affirming procedures applicable to the lower face and neck. A review of facial analysis in the context of masculine versus feminine facial features and the contributions of both soft tissue and bone to this anatomy is provided. The use of systematic facial evaluation and patient-driven concerns as a guide for presurgical planning is reviewed. Detailed descriptions of the unique surgical interventions to feminize the soft tissues and the skeletal framework of the lower face and neck are provided.

Gender Affirming Facial Surgery-Anatomy and Procedures for Facial Masculinization

For some patients, feminine facial features may cause significant gender dysphoria. Multiple nonsurgical and surgical techniques exist to masculinize facial features. Nonsurgical techniques include testosterone supplementation and dermal fillers. Surgical techniques include soft tissue manipulation, synthetic implants, regenerative scaffolding, or bony reconstruction. Many techniques are derived from experience with cisgender patients, but are adapted with special considerations to differing anatomy between cisgender and transgender men and women. Currently, facial masculinization is less commonly sought than feminization, but demand is likely to increase as techniques are refined and made available.

Analysis of Sexual Dimorphic Features of the Jawline and Chin in White Celebrity Faces

BACKGROUND

The jawline greatly influences facial shape and contributes to facial dimorphism. Analysis of lower facial shape and sexual dimorphic differences in contemporary attractive white faces can advance the goals of lower facial aesthetics and facial gender-affirming surgery (FGAS).

METHODS

Full-face, front-view photos of 47 white female and 21 white male celebrities were included from a list generated using GQ magazine's Highest Paid Models issue, People Magazine's Beautiful issue (1991-2022), and celebrities featured on lifestyle websites. Facial landmarks were detected through a facial analysis program using Vision framework and MATLAB. After converting pixel distances to absolute distances, lower face measurements were compared between males and females.

RESULTS

The mean lower facial height was 6.08 cm in females and 7.00 cm in males ( P value<0.001). The mean bigonial width was 11.21 cm in females and 12.30 cm in males ( P value<0.001). The ratio of facial height to lower facial height was 2.98 in females and 2.76 in males ( P value<0.001), signifying that symmetry in facial thirds is more prevalent in attractive female faces, while a longer lower face is more common in attractive male faces. The greatest differences in female and male facial contours were at gonial angles and chin.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of contemporary white celebrity faces demonstrated significantly wider and longer lower facial measurements in males. The overall contour of the female lower face was more tapered at the gonial angles and chin compared to males. These results are important when planning lower facial rejuvenation or FGAS, as lower face size and proportions influence perceived gender and attractiveness.

Gender-Affirming Surgery of the Mandible: Lower Jaw Feminization and Masculinization

For patients with gender dysphoria, gender-affirming surgery of the face has been shown to vastly improve quality of life. The mandible is one area of the face that has distinct feminine and masculine presentations. This article will review gender-affirming surgery of the lower jaw, both for feminization and masculinization. Techniques for bony contouring and soft tissue manipulation will be discussed.

Analysis of Cephalometric Points in Male and Female Mandibles: An Application to Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery

Gender-affirming facial surgery is a common intervention for transgender patients because of its ability to decrease the frequency of misgendering. Many anatomic targets can be addressed, but the mandible is the primary aspect of the lower third of the face that is manipulated during these procedures. This study's objective is to quantify the differences in cephalometric measurements between male and female mandibles on maxillofacial imaging, with the goal of identifying surgical targets for gender affirmation. A nonrandomized, retrospective, single-institution, case-control study of 387 patients who underwent maxillofacial computed tomography during 2017-2020 was performed. After excluding patients with imaging that did not capture the entire head or had deforming pathology of the face, a total of 113 patients were included. Cephalometric measurements that corresponded to areas reported by patients as sources of dysphoria were selected for analysis. These included mandibular width, ramus height, lateral flare, masseter volume, total face height, and the values of the mandibular angles in degrees. The relationship of masseter volume to the other measurements was also characterized. Significantly greater masseter volume was seen in males compared with females, and a greater masseter thickness was also seen in males. The mandibular angle was more acute in males than females. Aggregate analysis of muscle volume and thickness was positively correlated with ramus height, lateral flare, and mandibular width. Ramus, mental, and total facial height correlated directly with patient height in males but not in females. These data provide a normative baseline for planning lower facial gender-affirming surgery.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Facial Anthropometric Variations Among Cisgender Females of Different Ethnicities: Implications for Feminizing Facial Gender Affirming Surgery

BACKGROUND

Feminizing Facial Gender-Affirming Surgery (FFGAS) is gaining popularity among the diverse population of patients impacted by gender incongruence. However, most studies examining facial femininity are based on Caucasians. Thus, it is unclear if ethnic differences exist in anthropometric measures relevant to FFGAS procedures. This study aims to analyze ethnic anthropometric variations in the cisgender female face to identify differences that are potentially relevant to FFGAS.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was performed following PRISMA guidelines on June 25, 2021. Original studies reporting facial anthropometry in cisgender women were included. Anthropometric measures of interest included mandibular and zygomatic width, facial and forehead height, and nasolabial angle. A meta-analysis was performed using a linear mixed-effects model for each anthropometric measure.

RESULTS

A total of 1246 abstracts were screened, yielding 21 articles that met the inclusion criteria. Facial anthropometric data of 4792 cisgender females of 16 different ethnicities were analyzed. This meta-analysis demonstrated that compared with Caucasian cisgender women, Japanese, Chinese, and Korean cisgender women had a wider mandible (Japanese +20.13 mm [SE 4.43, P<0.001, P value adjusted for multiple comparisons (p-adj)=0.002], Chinese +16.22 mm [SE 4.39, P=0.002, p-adj=0.013]; and Korean +14.46 mm [SE 3.97, P=0.002, p-adj=0.014]). Further, when compared with Caucasian cisgender women, Chinese cisgender women demonstrated a larger zygomatic width, African American cisgender women tended to have smaller nasolabial angles, and Indian and Japanese cisgender women tended to have a smaller and larger facial height, respectively. However, following P value adjustment for multiple comparisons, these differences were not found to be statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that mandibular width tends to be greater for Japanese and Chinese cisgender women relative to Caucasian cisgender women. This data may be useful in counseling patients during preoperative evaluations ahead of mandibular reduction. No other anthropometric features were found to be significantly different among the ethnic groups studied. This portends that current approaches to FFGAS, which emphasize patient-specific needs and maintenance of a harmonious appearance, may require minimal or no adjustment to account for ethnic facial anthropometric differences.

Surgical techniques used in chin feminization: Literature review and knowledge update

Genioplasty is commonly performed as part of facial feminization surgery. Commonly addressed areas in facial feminization surgery include the chin. According to some authors, 100% of patients request genioplasty surgery in order to feminize their faces. Specific genioplasty techniques (involving generally reduction surgery) applied to transgender patients have been rarely described in the literature. Objective: We aimed to carry out a review of the literature to update the current knowledge on this subject while achieving a comprehensive synthesis of the available surgical techniques for reduction genioplasty in trans Male to Female patients. Conclusion: Reduction genioplasty is frequently performed in facial feminization surgery. Multiple surgical techniques for chin feminization have been described in the existing literature. Reduction genioplasty requires combined work in the sagittal and transverse planes so as to obtain a harmonious result. However, no comparative study on the different surgical techniques has as yet been conducted. Patient satisfaction or surgical complications (which tend to be rare) cannot be related to any specific surgical technique.

Shaping the Lower Jaw Border with Customized Cutting Guides: Development, Validation, and Application in Facial Gender-Affirming Surgery

Importance: Three-dimensional planning software is not standardized in facial gender-affirming surgery. Objective: To develop and validate surgical planning software to create cutting guides to contour the lower jaw border. Design, Setting, and Participants: A 3-year prospective case series study done in three phases: software development, validation, and surgical guide application. Ethics committee approval was obtained to enroll the patients (Clinical Research Ethics Committee, Hospital Costa del Sol, Marbella, Spain). Main Outcomes and Measures: Validation phase: degree of agreement between the planned and obtained results, modification of cephalometric parameters, and surgical times. Application phase: surgical technique description, complications, and patient-reported outcome measures. Results: The degree of agreement between the planned and obtained results was inframillimetric (0.31 ± 0.70 mm). The guides reduced the mandible to within feminine parameters (p < 0.05). Surgical times decreased by 10.96% with chin ostectomies (p < 0.05) and 23.06% with lower jaw border (angle-to-angle) surgeries (p < 0.001). In the application phase, revision surgery was required for 11 patients out of 260 (4.23%). Conclusions and Relevance: The use of cutting guides on the lower jaw border is effective, helps reach standard feminine parameters, and decreases surgical times.

ESSM Position Statement "Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery"

INTRODUCTION

Much has been published on the surgical and functional results following Gender Affirming Surgery ('GAS') in trans individuals. Comprehensive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS, however, are generally lacking.

AIM

To review the impact of various GAS on sexual wellbeing in treatment seeking trans individuals, and provide a comprehensive list of clinical recommendations regarding the various surgical options of GAS on behalf of the European Society for Sexual Medicine.

METHODS

The Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were reviewed on the results of sexual wellbeing after GAS.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

The task force established consensus statements regarding the somatic and general requirements before GAS and of GAS: orchiectomy-only, vaginoplasty, breast augmentation, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery, mastectomy, removal of the female sexual organs, metaidoioplasty, and phalloplasty. Outcomes pertaining to sexual wellbeing- sexual satisfaction, sexual relationship, sexual response, sexual activity, enacted sexual script, sexuality, sexual function, genital function, quality of sex life and sexual pleasure- are provided for each statement separately.

RESULTS

The present position paper provides clinicians with statements and recommendations for clinical practice, regarding GAS and their effects on sexual wellbeing in trans individuals. These data, are limited and may not be sufficient to make evidence-based recommendations for every surgical option. Findings regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS were mainly positive. There was no data on sexual wellbeing following orchiectomy-only, vocal feminization surgery, facial feminization surgery or the removal of the female sexual organs. The choice for GAS is dependent on patient preference, anatomy and health status, and the surgeon's skills. Trans individuals may benefit from studies focusing exclusively on the effects of GAS on sexual wellbeing.

CONCLUSION

The available evidence suggests positive results regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. We advise more studies that underline the evidence regarding sexual wellbeing following GAS. This position statement may aid both clinicians and patients in decision-making process regarding the choice for GAS. Özer M, Toulabi SP, Fisher AD, et al. ESSM Position Statement "Sexual Wellbeing After Gender Affirming Surgery". Sex Med 2022;10:100471.

Evaluation and treatment of facial feminization surgery: part II. lips, midface, mandible, chin, and laryngeal prominence

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) refers to a set of procedures aimed at altering the features of a masculine face to achieve a more feminine appearance. In the second part of this twopart series, assessment and operations involving the midface, mandible, and chin, as well as soft tissue modification of the nasolabial complex and chondrolaryngoplasty, are discussed. Finally, we provide a review of the literature on patient-reported outcomes in this population following FFS and suggest a path forward to optimize care for FFS patients.

Face Lift after Facial Feminization Surgery: Indications and Special Considerations

SUMMARY

Iatrogenic jowling can be an unintended consequence of facial feminization surgery. Reduction of the mandible and chin without overlying changes to the soft tissue can lead to a redundant and deflated soft-tissue envelope, requiring a face lift to address jowling, cervicofacial laxity, and/or lower facial rhytids. Prospective quality-of-life outcomes data support this hypothesis, as patients who underwent mandible contouring with or without angle osteotomies were significantly more likely to express interest in face lift following facial feminization surgery on univariable analysis (90.0 percent versus 10.0 percent, p = 0.038). Patients with inherent skin laxity are at particularly high risk, such as those with advancing age, extrinsic skin damage (e.g., sun exposure, cigarette smoke), and history of massive weight loss. Before facial feminization surgery, the authors recommend comprehensive patient counseling that includes a discussion of the possible future need for a face lift, preferably around 1 year after facial feminization surgery. When performing a face lift after facial feminization surgery, technical considerations include those related to sequelae of prior facial surgery, anatomical differences between cismale and cisfemale facial soft tissue, and the mechanism of jowling after facial feminization surgery versus normal facial aging. The authors believe that these considerations can set more realistic expectations for facial feminization surgery patients, improve surgeons' ability to skillfully execute this procedure, and ultimately contribute to ongoing quality-of-life improvements in facial feminization surgery patients.

Facial Gender Surgery: Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Consensus Guidelines from the International Facial Gender Symposium

BACKGROUND

Increasing societal acceptance of transgender people has led to broader availability of gender surgery and rapid growth in transition-related operations. Facial gender surgery aims to modify patients' facial features to be more congruent with their physical expression of gender, reducing gender dysphoria and improving quality of life. Growth in research and technique evolution has not kept pace with growth in clinical volume. Therefore, the first International Facial Gender Symposium was held at Johns Hopkins University in 2019, convening surgeons who perform facial gender surgery to share ideas and assess the state of clinical evidence.

METHODS

To review the literature on facial gender surgery, the authors developed a search strategy for seven electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, Cochrane, and Gender Studies) through May of 2019, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses systematic review guidelines.

RESULTS

Based on the English language literature and clinical experience, the authors suggest guidelines for screening, management, and appropriate surgical technique for patients undergoing facial gender surgery. They highlight facial gender surgery as a medically necessary intervention and identify shortcomings in current guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial gender surgery represents a complex array of craniofacial and soft-tissue procedures that require application of advanced skills and decision-making. Facial gender operations are not cosmetic, are medically necessary, and require development of new CPT codes specific to facial gender surgery. It is imperative to create educational programs and methods to define sufficient training for facial gender surgery surgeons. Research priorities include better procedural outcomes data, more quality-of-life studies, and insight into variation in both patient and procedural subgroups.

Neuroradiology in Transgender Care: Facial Feminization, Laryngeal Surgery, and Beyond

Transgender individuals experience incongruence between their gender identity and the sex assigned to them at birth. This incongruence can cause many transgender individuals to experience distressing physical and mental discord, a diagnosis known as gender dysphoria. Craniofacial structures have distinct anthropometric characteristics that affect perceived masculinity and femininity. The face, neck, and voice are highly exposed anatomic areas that have recognizable gender-specific characteristics that may hinder a transgender individual's successful social integration and public acceptance. Reconstructive facial and laryngeal procedures are among the surgical options transgender persons may elect to undergo to better align their physical appearance with their gender identity. These include feminization surgeries such as facial feminization and reduction chondrolaryngoplasty, as well as masculinizing facial and laryngeal surgeries. Maxillofacial CT is frequently used in the preoperative evaluation of patients before facial feminization surgery (FFS). Several CT measurements guide surgeons to the optimal correction required in FFS to achieve appropriate aesthetic planes. Mapping important craniofacial landmarks to avoid untoward surgical complications is crucial. Transgender patients may encounter other neurologic complications that require neuroimaging evaluation. For example, gender-affirming hormone therapy (eg, estrogen and testosterone) may increase the risk of stroke or may influence growth of various hormone-sensitive tumors such as pituitary adenomas. Radiologists may interpret imaging examinations in transgender patients for routine care or for evaluation before and after facial and laryngeal surgeries and must be aware of the role of neuroimaging in the care of this population. An invited commentary by Callen is available online. The online slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

Perioperative Considerations for Person-Centered Gender-Affirming Surgery

With more than 1 million people identifying as transgender in the United States alone, the likelihood of encountering a transgender patient and their family of choice in the perioperative setting is very high. A lack of data exists to equitably inform transgender-specific issues, as well as the associated morbidity during the transgender reassignment perioperative period. Anaesthesiologists should actively acquire the knowledge and skills needed to inclusively and respectfully manage these patients and be aware of their unique physiological and psychosocial needs. The pre-operative approach includes a detailed history, focusing on the patients cross-sex hormone treatment (CSHT) regimen and associated medical conditions. An in-depth understanding of commonly used hormones such as estrogen and testosterone and their effect in the perioperative periods is essential. The physical examination should be relevant to the anatomy that is currently present while taking into consideration feminising and masculinising procedures (e.g., genioplasty, thyroid cartilage augmentation), how these interventions alter the anatomy, and potential airway complications. Laboratory results should be interpreted with care – and with expert assistance if needed - as hormone therapy might affect reference values. In addition, risk assessment tools should be used with caution since they often include sex in their scoring system but do not account for the use of CSHT. Intraoperative considerations include urethral catheter placement, drug dosing, and drug interactions that are commonly encountered in the transgender patient. Special attention should be taken in transgender females who have undergone vocal feminization, as case reports have described unexpected difficult airway management. A multimodal approach, which includes regional blocks and attention to pre-existing chronic pain conditions, should be employed as part of the post-operative pain management plan. The post-operative nausea and vomiting risk has not yet been established in this population, requiring appropriate anti-emetic prophylaxis. Despite societal advances that improve transgender health, the medical community still lacks empirical evidence to effectively mitigate the distinctive challenges confronted by this at-risk population.

Imaging of Facial Reconstruction and Face Transplantation

Pre- and postoperative imaging is increasingly used in plastic and reconstructive surgery for the evaluation of bony and soft tissue anatomy. Imaging plays an important role in preoperative planning. In the postoperative setting, imaging is used for the assessment of surgical positioning, bone healing and fusion, and for the assessment of early or delayed surgical complications. This article will focus on imaging performed for surgical reconstruction of the face, including orthognathic surgery, facial feminization procedures for gender dysphoria, and face transplantation.

Consideration of Human Immunodeficiency Status in Patients Seeking Facial Feminization Surgery

ABSTRACT

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) with its proven safety and efficacy has become a mainstay surgical approach for those desiring gender-specific perceived feminine facial aesthetics. To date, specific characteristics of patients seeking FFS have been limited, with no studies investigating the role of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) on FFS outcomes. The potential clinical implications of HIV and more specifically HIV-associated lipodystrophy, which can cause facial lipoatrophy, require further investigation. Given the importance of midface projection in feminizing the face, the authors aimed to investigate any associations HIV or Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy may have on outcomes, including clinical consequences of facial lipoatrophy. The authors performed a retrospective chart review of all patients with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria referred to the senior author (EDR) for FFS between 2017 and 2020. Patients were grouped based on HIV status and demographics, history, and outcomes were assessed. Seventy-seven patients were included, with 28 patients (36.4%) having a diagnosis of HIV. A total of 25 (32.5%) and 23 (29.9%) patients underwent malar fat grafting and cheek implants, respectively. No significant difference was found between HIV-positive and HIV-negative patients when looking at the use of malar fat grafting, cheek implants, age, or complication rates. To the best of our knowledge, this study presents the largest cohort of HIV status assessment of FFS patients to date. Future studies, particularly on the long-term outcomes, are warranted, as is continued information sharing among providers and centers performing FFS, in order to continue advancing the literature and subsequently patient care.

Gender-Affirming Facial Surgery: Experiences and Outcomes at an Academic Center

Background: Gender-affirming facial surgery (GFS) is becoming more widely available for transgender individuals, but data on surgical approaches and outcomes remain limited. Methods: Retrospective analysis of surgical outcomes among consecutive GFS cases performed at a tertiary care academic center between March 2016 and August 2020. Results: Seventy-seven patients underwent 109 surgeries, including 478 individual procedures. The median age was 42 years. Ninety-five percent of patients had public health insurance. Two-stage GFS was often used in older patients (p = 0.001), with the first stage involving bone and cartilaginous alterations, and the second stage involving soft tissue procedures. Mean hospital stay after first-stage GFS was 1.2 days, with 70% discharged on postoperative day 1. Mean follow-up was 11.3 months. Among 66 patients with at least 1 month of follow-up, all complications were minor and included surgical site infection (5%), dehiscence (3.0%), seroma (3%), and medical complications (6%). Thirty-day hospital readmission rate was 1.5%. Conclusions: There are unique surgical approaches for GFS, which demonstrate low complication and readmission rates. Understanding these approaches and outcomes may help guide preoperative patient consultations and clinical decision making.

Facial Masculinization from Procedures to Payment: A Review

As the demand for gender-affirming procedures continues to increase, patients and providers have a greater imperative to understand the current state of facial masculinization. Facial reconstruction for transgender women has been shown to treat gender dysphoria effectively and reduce rates of discrimination and victimization. Although facial masculinization surgery for transgender men is less common, there are multiple surgical and nonsurgical options to supplement the effect of hormone therapy on facial appearance, including but not limited to: receding the hair line, flattening the forehead, expanding the supraorbital ridge, increasing the dorsal nasal projection, squaring the jaw, and augmenting the chin. This review aims to summarize these techniques for providers who wish to inform transgender male patients about their options and discuss them in the context of patient satisfaction and availability of insurance coverage.

Necessity of facial contouring in feminization surgery for Chinese transgender females

Background

An increasing number of transgender females are suffering from a critical gender dysphoria, which often presents as depression and self-destructive behavior. Facial feminization surgery (FFS) is an effective method to alleviate symptoms of gender dysphoria, which could be more important than genital reassignment surgery for Chinese. Facial contour surgery is perceived as an ordinary FFS for the Chinese women to improve their facial appearance. The zygoma and jaw are key areas for feminizing the facial contour. This study mainly emphasized the necessity of FFS and discussed the importance of facial contour surgery of Chinese individuals.

Methods

The differences of facial contour before and after FFS in terms of skeletal and soft tissue were analyzed. The pre- and postoperative images were evaluated for feminization. The results of the full suite of measurements were compared to reveal the effective change of FFS. Furthermore, a surgery satisfaction survey was conducted among these patients after recovery.

Results

All the patients expressed their satisfaction with the reduction in the intergonial width as well as the middle face prominence. All the facial contour ratios changed significantly after surgery in both hard tissue and soft tissue.

Conclusions

Facial contour surgery is crucial to changing one's facial appearance and sex impression, which significantly alleviates gender dysphoria.

Trans-oral versus cervico-facial lift approach for mandibular angle resection in facial feminization: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Mandibular angle resection is an important procedure in facial feminization surgery. Two different approaches are described: trans-oral and cervico-facial lift (CFL) approaches. The aim of the study was to compare surgical outcomes and patient's satisfaction between the two approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed medical charts of patients who underwent mandibular angle resection in the same center by the same surgeon between 2017 and 2019. Aesthetic and functional results were objectively assessed using serial photographs and subjectively with patient self-assessments. All patients benefited from a medical consultation at least 6 months after the surgery.

RESULTS

Seven patients benefited from trans-oral approach and 14 from CFL approach. The mean age was 42. No major complications occurred. No long-term nerve damage was found. Aesthetic evaluation showed mostly an improved result. All patients answered positively to the quality of life survey.

DISCUSSION

These preliminary results of the study suggest that mandibular angle resection is a much-needed and safe surgical procedure regardless of the surgical approach. Patients who underwent facial feminization surgery frequently present a mixed indication of CFL and mandibular angle resection. The study is limited by the low number of patients included. Moreover, interpretation of results is biased because the patients benefited from other minor facial cosmetic procedures in the same surgery. We reported the first analysis of transgender patient's satisfaction concerning mandibular angle resection. This procedure improves quality of life as well as facial aesthetics for transgender patients.

Legislation, Market Size, and Access to Gender-affirming Genital Surgery in the United States

The value of gender-affirming genital surgery (GAGS) has been established for certain transgender or gender non-conforming patients. This study aimed to determine the availability of GAGS by state and region in the United States, and to query possible associations of access to care with healthcare legislation and local market size.

Mandibular Angle Contouring Using Porous Polyethylene Stock or PEEK-based Patient Specific Implants. A Critical Analysis

ABSTRACT

Contour augmentation and mandibular angle modification surgery is becoming increasingly. The aim of this research is to compare technique and outcomes in augmentations done with standard implants or PEEK-based patient specific implants (PSI) in mandibular angle. Data from surgical planning, operative and post-operative of 6 months follow-up were revised for 21 patients who were submitted to facial surgery using a stock implant obtained from companies currently on the market or 3D implants created with CAD/CAM technology using PEEK 3D printing. Surgical time, intra-operative and post-operative complications were compared, analyzing the advantages and disadvantage of each technique. Statistical analyses using t-test and chi-squared were performed considering P value< 0.05 for statistical differences. Twelve patients were operated on with stock implants and nine patients with PSI. The surgical time was 15 minutes less for the 3D implant surgeries (P = 0.021) and intraoperatively only the stock implants needed modifications with wear and adaptation methods; post-operative infections were observed in both groups with no significant differences (P > 0.05). The 3D implants had greater levels of facial symmetry than the stock implants, although they did not present significant differences.Considering the limitations of this study, mandibular angle implants with a PEEK-based 3D CAD/CAM are efficient, stable and have a low complication rate; the CAD/CAM strategy is useful in facial surgery and can be integrated as a standard for surgical planning in facial makeover surgery.

Prospective Quality-of-Life Outcomes after Facial Feminization Surgery: An International Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

No data exist on the prospective outcomes of facial feminization surgery. This study set out to determine the effects of facial feminization surgery on quality-of-life outcomes for gender-diverse patients.

METHODS

A prospective, international, multicenter, cohort study with adult gender-diverse patients with gender dysphoria was undertaken. Facial feminization outcome score was calculated preoperatively and postoperatively (1-week to 1-month and >6 months). Photogrammetric cephalometries were measured at the same time points. Self-perceived preoperative masculinity and femininity were recorded. Externally rated gender appearance (scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being most feminine) and general aesthetics (scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being very good) for 10 facial feminization surgery patients were compared with those of five cisgender controls. Univariate linear regression analyses were used to predict outcomes from facial feminization surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-six consecutive patients were enrolled. Patients noted that their brows, jaws, and chins were the most masculine aspects of their faces (54.5 percent, 33.3 percent, and 30.3 percent, respectively). Median facial feminization outcome score increased from 47.2 preoperatively to 80.6 at 6 months or more postoperatively (p < 0.0001). Mean satisfaction was excellent (3.0 at both 1-month and ≥6-month follow-up; p = 0.46). Cephalometric values were significantly more feminine after surgery. Gender appearance was feminine to very feminine (1.83 ± 0.96) and general aesthetics were good (6.09 ± 2.01) but different from those of cisgender women controls (1.25 ± 0.49 and 7.63 ± 1.82, respectively; p < 0.001 for each).

CONCLUSION

Facial feminization achieved improved quality of life, feminized cephalometries, feminine gender appearance, good overall aesthetics, and high satisfaction that were present at 1 month and stable at more than 6 months.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Initial Facial Feminization Surgery Experience in a Multicenter Integrated Health Care System

Objective

There are few large studies on facial feminization surgery (FFS). We provide the largest comprehensive report to date of an FFS cohort regarding the safety of multilevel surgery, patient-specific considerations with FFS procedures, and complications of surgery.

Study Design

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Multicenter integrated health care system.

Subjects and Methods

We examined all patients undergoing FFS within our institution from April 2016 to October 2018. Patients over the age of 18 with a diagnosis of gender dysphoria underwent any combination of scalp advancement, cranioplasty, brow lift, rhinoplasty, upper lip lift, mandibuloplasty, chondrolaryngoplasty, and/or additional cosmetic procedures. Medical records were reviewed for preoperative characteristics, FFS procedures undergone, and postoperative complications.

Results

In total, 121 patients underwent a total of 594 FFS procedures. Seventy-five percent of patients had only 1 or no comorbidities, and 90% of patients underwent cranioplasty, scalp advancement, and brow lift. African American patients (n = 5) less commonly underwent cranioplasty compared to those of other ethnicities (white, P < .001; Asian, P = .022; Hispanic, P = .014; multiracial, P = .006). Asian patients less commonly underwent rhinoplasty than white patients (38% vs 73%, P = .023). Only 8 (6.6%) patients experienced a significant complication after surgery.

Conclusions

The population undergoing FFS is generally healthy, the upper third of the face is most commonly addressed, there are age and ethnic considerations in FFS, and major complications after multilevel surgery are uncommon.

Chest and facial surgery for the transgender patient

In conjunction with social transition, hormones, and counseling, gender-affirming surgery (GAS) is a key component in the treatment gender dysphoria. Gender affirming surgeries can be divided into genital surgery (phalloplasty, metoidioplasty, oophorectomy, vaginoplasty, and orchiectomy) and non-genital surgeries. The non-genital surgeries for transmasculine individuals include chest masculinization and body contouring. For transfeminine individuals, they include breast augmentation, and facial feminization. Chest masculinization eliminates the need for binding and improves overall confidence and quality of life. Choice of technique depends on body habitus and patient preference. For transfeminine individuals, some breast growth can be achieved with the use of estrogen over the course of 1-2 years, but many still require breast augmentation for breasts that are proportionate to their frame. Facial surgery for transfeminine patients is highly effective in changing classic masculine anatomic features to feminine norms. The most common of these procedures include forehead contouring, rhinoplasty, lip lift, mandible angle reduction, genioplasty and chondrolaryngoplasty. These non-genital surgeries are critical to treating gender dysphoria in transgender and gender non-binary individuals. Further research with standardized and validated assessments of patient reported outcomes is needed to fully understand long term effects on quality of life and gender dysphoria.