Haptic information provided by anchors and the presence of cognitive tasks contribute separately to reducing postural sway in young adults

Influence of the anchor system on body sway in women affected and not affected by lymphedema secondary to breast cancer: A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Postural control is an essential ability for functional independence modified by therapeutic approaches and morbidities secondary to breast cancer. The anchor system enables additional haptic perception of body position in front of the support base and can be used alone or in conjunction with sensorimotor training.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What is the influence of the anchor system, through different manual contacts on the upper limb, on body sway in women affected and not affected by lymphedema secondary to breast cancer treatment?

METHODS

Cross-sectional study involving 60 women homogeneously distributed to the group affected by lymphedema (GAL), with a mean age of 62.53 (SD = 12.54) years and upper limb volume difference (ULVD = Ipsilateral - Contralateral) of 636.21 (SD = 387.94) cm3, and group not affected by lymphedema (GNAL), with a mean age of 57.24 (SD = 11.43) years and ULVD of -8.91 (SD = 121.72) cm3. Baropodometry was used to assess body sway, through the presence and absence of the visual sense, associated with different manual contacts of the anchor system designated absence, simulation of use, unilateral and bilateral contact. The Shapiro-Wilk and Student's T-tests with Bonferroni Post-Hoc were used in the statistical analysis (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

The GAL expressed non-significant values compared to the GNAL in the absence of visual sense and non-use of the anchor system. The unilateral contact of the anchor system on the preferred upper limb in the presence of the visual sense, and bilateral contact of the anchor system in the presence and absence of the visual sense promoted a significant reduction of body sway in both groups.

SIGNIFICANCE

In breast cancer survivors, the anchor system with bilateral contact effectively maintains postural control, regardless of the visual sense and the volume of the upper limb.

A static posturography guide to implementing time-to-boundary

The emergence of time-to-boundary provides an advanced representation of the spatiotemporal characteristics of postural control through the estimation of the time required for the center of pressure to reach the boundary of the base of support. Time-to-boundary has demonstrated its utility in several healthy and clinical adoptions; however, unknown inconsistencies among studies exist. Text and graphical representations understandably highlight idealistic standards, but new investigators to this measure are forced to wade through the same potential pitfalls that others have addressed, but the field has neglected to concatenate. The purpose of this communication is to share recent methodological advancements made to enhance time-to-boundary and describe the components of the time-to-boundary code that is being made publicly accessible for the first time. We anticipate future researchers who wish to apply this methodology to their data processing toolbox could utilize our script in full, with any deviations in potential future developments noted in clear fashion. Historically, researchers (including ourselves) have had to interpret text-based descriptions of the existing literature into quantitative steps in a computational mathematics script. In contrast to fixed process measures that do not require investigator input (e.g., path length), time-to-boundary poses two distinct but connected challenges to investigators. The coding process itself can be a hurdle for novices or practitioners. Second, transferring logical considerations such as robust, objective event detection routines must be defended in the review process. This comprehensive guide to time-to-boundary, as used in our applications, should enhance adoption and advance the comprehension of postural control.

Effects of the Anchor System on Postural Balance of Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Treatment: A Clinical, Randomized, Controlled, and Crossover Trial

OBJECTIVE

Investigate the effects of multisensory training with and without the anchor system on breast cancer survivors' postural balance and self-efficacy of falls.

DESIGN

Clinical randomized, controlled, and crossover trial.

SETTING

Teaching, Research, and Assistance Center in Mastectomized Rehabilitation.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty breast cancer survivors homogeneously distributed in the groups of adults and elderly affected, or not, by lymphedema.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to multisensory training with and without the anchor system involving 3 sessions per week for 12 weeks. After the 4-week washout period, the remaining therapeutic intervention was applied.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was semi-static and dynamic balance as evaluated by baropodometry and Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test, and the secondary outcome was self-efficacy of the fall episode as assessed by Falls Efficacy Scale - International in the pre-, post-immediate, and 4-week follow-up period.

RESULTS

Both therapeutic interventions caused positive and significant effects on postural balance and self-efficacy of falls in the immediate period. The multisensory training with the anchor system induced significant functional retention in the short term, related to the clinical effect of small to moderate variation.

CONCLUSIONS

Multisensory training with the anchor system is convenient for postural balance and self-efficacy for falls, regardless of age and upper limb volume, for breast cancer survivors.

Good times, bad times? An evaluation of event detection strategies in time to boundary postural assessments

Time-to-boundary (TtB) is a popular balance metric that identifies minimum reaction times available to correct balance challenges during quiet standing. Minimum event criteria is a critical methodological consideration to determine physiologically relevant TtB outcomes yet selection methodology appears inconsistent and/or vaguely defined across studies. This study aimed to identify a robust, objective methodology to select meaningful TtB outcomes. Ninety-seven healthy adults stood quietly on a force platform with eyes open and feet together. Anterior-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) center-of-pressure data from 150 s were utilized to compute a TtB series. The MATLAB findpeaks function identified minima with and without a time delay following selected events and/or a vertical axis threshold. An individualized time delay excluded excessively large values that hold no clinically relevant information, and this effect was enhanced by a vertical threshold at 22 s. The absolute minimum TtB was unaffected by any findpeaks criteria. The recommendations implicated by these results will help improve clarity and consistency among TtB studies, thereby enhancing the applicability of clinical findings.

Effect of the haptic anchors during balancing and walking tasks in older adults: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Older adults are benefited from the continuous tactile information to enhance postural control. Therefore, the aim was to evaluate the effect of the haptic anchors during balancing and walking tasks in older adults.

METHODS

The search strategy (up to January 2023) was based on the PICOT (older adults; anchor system during balance and walking tasks; any control group; postural control measurements; short and/or long-term effect). Two pairs of reviewers independently examined all titles and abstracts for eligibility. The reviewers independently extracted data from the included studies, assessed the risk of bias, and certainty of the evidence.

RESULTS

Six studies were included in the qualitative synthesis. All studies used a 125-g haptic anchor system. Four studies used anchors when standing in a semi-tandem position, two in tandem walking on different surfaces, and one in an upright position after plantar flexor muscle fatigue. Two studies showed that the anchor system reduced body sway. One study showed that the ellipse area was significantly lower for the 50% group (reduced frequency) in the post-practice phase. One study showed that the reduction in the ellipse area was independent of the fatigue condition. Two studies observed reduced trunk acceleration in the frontal plane during tandem waking tasks. The studies had low to moderate certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSION

Haptic anchors can reduce postural sway during balance and walking tasks in older adults. Also, positive effects were seen during the delayed post-practice phase after the removal of anchors only in individuals who used a reduced anchor frequency.

Haptic input and balance control: An exploratory study examining normative messaging

This study examined the effect of descriptive norm messaging information on the relationship between haptic input and balance control. Participants were randomly assigned to either a message group where they balanced with haptic input after receiving a descriptive norm message about the positive effect of haptic input or a control group. Findings from an analysis of covariance revealed a significant difference between the two groups. Those in the descriptive norm message group had better balance control than those in the control group. These findings suggest that efforts designed to improve balance control through haptic input may be enhanced through normative messaging.