Judging heel height: A new test for proprioception while standing reveals that young hypermobile children perform better than controls

Proprioception and its relationship with range of motion in hypermobile and normal mobile children

To investigate differences in proprioception using four proprioceptive tests in children with and without hypermobility. Additionally, it was tested if the results on one proprioceptive test predict the results on the other tests. Of the children (8-11years), 100 were classified as normal mobile (Beighton score 0-4) and 50 as hypermobile (Beighton score 5-9). To test proprioception, in the upper extremity the unilateral and bilateral joint position reproduction tasks were used and for the lower extremity the loaded and unloaded wedges task. No differences were found in any of the proprioception tests between the two groups. Estimating the height of the wedges was easier in the loaded position (mean penalty in standing and sitting position, 4.78 and 6.19, respectively). Recalling the elbow position in the same arm resulted in smaller errors compared to tasks reproducing the position with the contralateral arm. Of the four angles used (110°, 90°, 70°, 50°), the position recall in the 90° angle had the smallest position error (1.8°). Correlations between the proprioception tests were weak (Loaded and Unloaded (r 0. 28); Uni and Bilateral (r 0.39), Upper and Lower extremity not significant). No indication of poorer proprioception was found in children with hypermobile joints compared to their normal mobile peers. Loading gives extra information that leads to fewer errors in the wedges task performed while standing, but this effect is independent of joint mobility. Proprioception test outcomes are dependent on the test used; upper extremity results do not predict lower extremity outcomes or vice versa.

The strength of balance: Strength and dynamic balance in children with and without hypermobility

BACKGROUND

Generalized Joint hypermobility (GJH) is predominantly non-symptomatic. In fact, individuals with joint flexibility usually perform better than their non-hypermobile counterparts during physical activities. Notwithstanding, strength and balance are essential to maintain the control of the extra range of motion during activities and to prevent musculoskeletal complications. There are limited and conflicting pieces of evidence in literature regarding the association between strength and balance in children with GJH.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to examine differences in functional strength, dynamic balance, proprioception, and isometric strength in children with and without joint hypermobility and determine the association between strength outcomes and dynamic balance.

METHOD

A cross-sectional study was conducted among children aged 6 to 11. Hypermobility was determined using the Beighton Score, with scores ≥6 representing hypermobility. Functional strength was assessed with the Functional Strength Measure (FSM), isometric strength was determined with a handheld dynamometer (HHD), the Y-Balance Test (YBT) was used to assess dynamic balance and the Wedges test to measure proprioception.

RESULTS

This study included 588 participants (age: 7.97 ± 1.3 years; height: 128±10.1 cm; mass: 27.18 ± 7.98 kg). 402 children were classified as having normal mobility and 186 as being hypermobile. Hypermobile children had better functional strength in the lower extremities than children with normal range mobility but lower reach distance in the YBT. No differences in proprioception, functional strength of the upper extremity or isometric strength in the hands were found. However, isometric lower extremity force was less in hypermobile children than children with normal range mobility. Irrespective of their joint mobility, a fair significant correlation existed between total Y-balance distance and FSM items r = 0.16-0.37, p = 0.01. Correlations between total Y-balance distance and isometric strength of knee and ankle muscles ranged between r = 0.26-0.42, p = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

Hypermobile joints seem to co-occur with lower extremity isometric strength, more functional strength in the lower extremities and less reaching distance in dynamic balance. The opposing direction of the results on functional and isometric strength tests highlights the importance of the type of outcome measures used to describe the association of strength and the range of motion.

The relationship between kinaesthesia, motor performance, physical fitness and joint mobility in children living in Nigeria

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the relationship between kinaesthesia, motor performance, fitness, and joint mobility in children.

METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted involving children from two primary schools in the South-Eastern part of Nigeria. The Beighton criteria were used to measure joint mobility. Motor performance, fitness, and kinaesthesia were measured in all the children. Spearman's rank correlation was used to evaluate the relationship between the outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 91 children (51.6% girls) participated in the study. The mean age of the children was 8.20 ± 1.98 years. Using a Beighton score of ≥ 6, Generalized Joint Hypermobility (GJH) was identified in a total of 35 (38.46%) children and was more prevalent in females (60.0%). Joint mobility had significant correlations with most fitness and motor performance items, but not kinaesthesia. Agility & power, and motor performance seem to be reduced if mobility is larger. Kinaesthesia was correlated with most fitness and motor performance items, indicating that better fitness and better motor performance cooccur with better kinaesthesia or vice versa.

CONCLUSION

Joint mobility may have a significant influence on fitness and motor performance in children. Hence, it may be useful for future studies to investigate how fitness and motor performance modulate the onset and progression of musculoskeletal symptoms in GJH.

Evaluation of Knee Position Sense in Children with Motor Disabilities and Children with Typical Development: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

In children with motor disabilities, knee position during walking is often of concern in rehabilitation. This study aimed to investigate knee joint position sense. Thirty-seven children with Cerebral Palsy (CP), 21 with Myelomeningocele (MMC), 19 with Arthrogryposis (AMC), and 42 TD children participated in the study. Knee joint position sense, i.e., the difference between the criterion angle and the reproduced angle (JPS-error), was assessed in sitting while 3D motion capture was recorded at flexed knee 70 (Knee70), 45 (Knee45), and 20 (Knee20) degrees, and after three seconds at maintained criterion angle (CAM) and maintained reproduced angle (RAM). No differences were found between the groups in JPS-error, CAM, and RAM. At Knee70, CAM differed between the right and left legs in the TD group (p = 0.014) and RAM in the MMC group (p = 0.021). In the CP group, CAM was greater than RAM at Knee70 in the left leg (p = 0.002), at Knee45 in both legs (p = 0.004, p = 0.025), and at Knee20 in the right leg (p = 0.038). Difficulties in maintaining the knee position at CAM in the CP group sheds light on the need for complementary judgments of limb proprioception in space to explore the potential influence on knee position during walking.

Prevalence and Demographic Distribution of Hypermobility in a Random Group of School-Aged Children in Nigeria

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of hypermobility in randomly selected healthy children, without previous trauma or disease process affecting the joints and whether other demographic variables (age, sex, BMI) had an impact on Beighton scores and range of motion (RoM) in children between 6 and 10 years of age.

RESULTS

286 children were included; 27.3% of them had a Beighton score ≥7/9 and 72% would be classified hypermobile if we had used a Beighton cut-off score ≥4/9. Prevalence declined with increasing age. Girls were more often hypermobile (34%) than boys (20%) and this was mainly caused by increased RoM in the knees. Positive scores of finger items of the Beighton were more common than on the other items, leading to a high prevalence of peripheral hypermobility. Localized hypermobility was only found in the fifth MCP joint. A total of 15% of the children with normal mobility reached 20 excess degrees RoM of the left and right fifth MCP. Pain was present in 12 of the 239 children but was not linked to the level of mobility.

CONCLUSION

Hypermobility is the rule in this pain-free population of children with GJH.

Examination of foot sensations in children with generalized joint hypermobility

BACKGROUND

Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a condition that can be observed in children and children with GJH may have problems such as clumsiness, proprioceptive sensory loss, balance and coordination disorders.

AIMS

To evaluate foot and ankle senses in children with GJH and compare them with their healthy peers.

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Children aged 5-14 years with and without GJH were included in the study.

OUTCOME MEASURES

After assessing the joint hypermobility of the children with the Beighton Score, tactile, vibration, two-point discrimination, and proprioception senses were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 40 children (15 females, 25 males, mean age 9.43 years, SD ± 2.98 years, 20 with GJH and 20 without GJH) were included in the study. In children with GJH, foot sole tactile sense and ankle dorsiflexion and plantar flexion joint position sense were deficient in comparison with healthy controls (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

There were deficiencies in foot and ankle tactile and proprioceptive senses in children with GJH. Neurosensorimotor examination of balance and coordination should be performed and appropriate intervention programs should be planned accordingly in children with GJH.

Kinematic alterations of the ankle in subjects with generalized joint hypermobility compared with the controls: A cross-sectional study

INTRODUCTION

Generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) is a hereditary connective tissue disease in which the range of motion (ROM) of multiple joints exceeds the normal range, and the ROM varies with age, gender, and ethnicity. At present, the six-degree-of-freedom (6-DOF) of ankle kinematics among people with GJH have not been studied. To investigate the kinematic characteristics in the ankle during treadmill gait of university students with generalized joint hypermobility compared to normal participants. We hypothesized that compared to the participants in the control group, those with GJH would exhibit kinematic characteristics of poorer active motion stability in the ankle during treadmill gait.

METHODS

Healthy university student volunteers aged 18-24 (excluding those with a history of ankle trauma, etc.) were recruited and divided into a control group (50 volunteers) and a GJH group (Beighton score ≥4, 50 volunteers). Data of the 6-DOF kinematics of ankle was collected using a 3D gait analysis system. Variables were evaluated using independent t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

RESULTS

In the proximal/distal parameter, proximal displacement was significantly increased in the GJH group compared with the control group during 4-9% and 96-97% of the gait phase (loading response and terminal swing phase), with an increase of (0.1-0.2 cm, p < .05). Regarding the proximal/distal, internal/external, plantarflexion/dorsiflexion, and anterior/posterior parameters, the participants with GJH exhibited greater ROM than those in the control group throughout the gait cycle (0.24 ± 0.22 cm vs. 0.19 ± 0.15 cm, p = 0.047, 5.56 ± 2.90° vs. 4.48 ± 3.30°, p = .020, 23.05 ± 5.75° vs. 20.36 ± 4.91°, p < .001, 0.65 ± 0.30 cm vs. 0.55 ± 0.27 cm, p = .018). However, ROM of inversion/eversion translation was found to be decreased in the GJH group compared to the control group (8.92 ± 1.59° vs. 9.47 ± 1.37°, p = .009). In addition, there was no statistical difference between the GJH group and the control group in ROM of medial/lateral translation (0.05 ± 0.06 cm vs. 0.04 ± 0.05 cm, p = .131).

CONCLUSION

Our results confirm that our hypothesis is not valid. Although there were a few differences in each gait parameter of the ankle between the GJH group and the control group, the difference was not significant. These results indicate that the presence of GJH has less effect on ankle kinematics and enhance our knowledge of the relationship between GJH and 6-DOF of ankle kinematics.