Évaluation de l’état nutritionnel au cours de la cirrhose

The management of perioperative nutrition in patients with end stage liver disease undergoing liver transplantation

Malnutrition is found in almost 100% of patients with end stage liver disease (ESLD) awaiting transplantation and malnutrition before transplantation leads to higher rates of post-transplant complications and worse graft survival outcomes. Reasons for protein energy malnutrition include several metabolic alterations such as inadequate intake, malabsorption, and overloaded expenditure. And also, stress from surgery, gastrointestinal reperfusion injury, immunosuppressive therapy and corticosteriods use lead to delayed bowl function recovery and disorder of nutrients absorption. In the pretransplant phase, nutritional goals include optimization of nutritional status and treatment of nutrition-related symptoms induced by hepatic decompensation. During the acute post-transplant phase, adequate nutrition is required to help support metabolic demands, replenish lost stores, prevent infection, arrive at a new immunologic balance, and promote overall recovery. In a word, it is extremely important to identify and correct nutritional deficiencies in this population and provide an adequate nutritional support during all phases of liver transplantation (LT). This study review focuses on prevalence, nutrition support, evaluation, and management of perioperative nutrition disorder in patients with ESLD undergoing LT.

Malnutrition assessed through phase angle and its relation to prognosis in patients with compensated liver cirrhosis: a prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Malnutrition is a frequent complication of cirrhosis and it has been associated to more severe disease and development of complications. Phase angle is a bedside reliable tool for nutritional assessment based on conductivity properties of body tissues.

AIM

To evaluate the association between malnutrition assessed through phase angle and mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in a tertiary care centre; 249 patients were enrolled with 48 months of follow-up. Clinical, nutritional (malnutrition = phase angle ≤ 4.9°) and biochemical evaluations were performed. Student's t-test and χ(2) method were used as appropriate. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariate Cox regression were used to evaluate mortality.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 33.5 months. Survival analysis showed higher mortality in the malnourished group compared to the well-nourished group (p = 0.076), Kaplan-Meier curves were further stratified according to compensated and decompensated status showing higher mortality in compensated patients according to Child-Pugh (p = 0.002) and Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (p = 0.008) when malnutrition was present. Multivariate analysis showed that malnutrition was independently associated with mortality (HR = 2.15, 1.18-3.92).

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort, malnutrition was independently associated with mortality. This is the first study showing higher mortality in malnourished compensated cirrhotic patients.

[French survey on perioperative nutrition in cirrhotic adult patients waiting for liver transplantation]

OBJECTIVE

The European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (EPSEN) guidelines on nutrition for liver disease patients has been recently updated. The aim of our study was to evaluate perioperative nutrition in cirrhotic patients waiting for liver transplantation (LT).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective electronic survey. A standardized questionnaire was sent to the anaesthesiologist of the 18 French adult LT centers. The questionnaire had closed-ended questions to evaluate nutritional practices in cirrhotic patients waiting for a LT.

RESULTS

The response rate was 100%. Nutritional status of the cirrhotic patients waiting for LT was assessed by anaesthesiologists (12 centres) and/or hepatologists (11 centres) and more rarely by nutrition physician, dietetics or liver surgeons. Body mass index (13 centres), weight loss (10 centres), albuminemia (10 centres) were the most frequent items used to assess the nutritional status. Before LT, preoperative oral intakes were administered in undernourished patients in only 55% of the cases. Postoperatively, nutritional support was administered between day 1 and 3 after LT.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative nutritional practices in cirrhotic patients waiting for LT are heterogeneous between centers, especially about nutrition assessment. Most of the centres did not follow the actual guidelines.

Management of liver cirrhosis between primary care and specialists

This article discusses a practical, evidence-based approach to the diagnosis and management of liver cirrhosis by focusing on etiology, severity, presence of complications, and potential home-managed treatments. Relevant literature from 1985 to 2010 (PubMed) was reviewed. The search criteria were peer-reviewed full papers published in English using the following MESH headings alone or in combination: “ascites”, “liver fibrosis”, “cirrhosis”, “chronic hepatitis”, “chronic liver disease”, “decompensated cirrhosis”, “hepatic encephalopathy”, “hypertransaminasemia”, “liver transplantation” and “portal hypertension”. Forty-nine papers were selected based on the highest quality of evidence for each section and type (original, randomized controlled trial, guideline, and review article), with respect to specialist setting (Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Internal Medicine) and primary care. Liver cirrhosis from any cause represents an emerging health issue due to the increasing prevalence of the disease and its complications worldwide. Primary care physicians play a key role in early identification of risk factors, in the management of patients for improving quality and length of life, and for preventing complications. Specialists, by contrast, should guide specific treatments, especially in the case of complications and for selecting patient candidates for liver transplantation. An integrated approach between specialists and primary care physicians is essential for providing better outcomes and appropriate home care for patients with liver cirrhosis.

Operative risks of digestive surgery in cirrhotic patients

Digestive surgery in cirrhotic patients has long been limited to the treatment of disorders related to the liver disease (portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma and umbilical hernia). The improvement in cirrhotic patient management has allowed an increase in surgical procedures for extrahepatic indications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the operative risks of such surgical procedures. Extrahepatic surgery in cirrhotic patients is associated with high mortality and morbidity. Emergency surgery, gastrointestinal tract opening (esophagus, stomach and colon), <30 g/L serum albumin, transaminase levels more than three times the upper limit of normal, ascites, and intraoperative transfusions are the main risk factors for postoperative death. In Child A patients, the operative risk of elective surgery is moderate and surgical indications are not altered by the presence of cirrhosis. The laparoscopic approach should be recommended because of the potentially lower morbidity. In Child C patients, operative mortality is often higher than 40%; surgical indications must remain exceptional and non operative management has to be preferred. In Child B patients, preoperative improvement of liver function is mandatory for lower risk surgery.