1
|
Ruck A, van der Wal R, S C Hood A, L Mauchline A, G Potts S, F WallisDeVries M, Öckinger E. Farmland biodiversity monitoring through citizen science: A review of existing approaches and future opportunities. AMBIO 2024; 53:257-275. [PMID: 37973702 PMCID: PMC10774504 DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01929-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Biodiversity monitoring in agricultural landscapes is important for assessing the effects of both land use change and activities that influence farmland biodiversity. Despite a considerable increase in citizen science approaches to biodiversity monitoring in recent decades, their potential in farmland-specific contexts has not been systematically examined. This paper therefore provides a comprehensive review of existing citizen science approaches involving biodiversity monitoring on farmland. Using three complementary methods, we identify a range of programmes at least partially covering farmland. From these, we develop a typology of eight programme types, reflecting distinctions in types of data collected and nature of volunteer involvement, and highlight their respective strengths and limitations. While all eight types can make substantial contributions to farmland biodiversity monitoring, there is considerable scope for their further development-particularly through increased engagement of farmers, for whom receiving feedback on the effects of their own practices could help facilitate adaptive management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andy Ruck
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | - René van der Wal
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Amelia S C Hood
- School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK
| | - Alice L Mauchline
- School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK
| | - Simon G Potts
- School of Agriculture, Policy and Development, Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, Reading, RG6 6EU, UK
| | - Michiel F WallisDeVries
- De Vlinderstichting/Dutch Butterfly Conservation, P.O. Box 506, 6700AM, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Öckinger
- Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7044, 75007, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mateos‐Fierro Z, Garratt MPD, Fountain MT, Ashbrook K, Westbury DB. The potential of wildflower strips to enhance pollination services in sweet cherry orchards grown under polytunnels. J Appl Ecol 2023. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.14394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
|
3
|
Ratto F, Breeze TD, Cole LJ, Garratt MPD, Kleijn D, Kunin B, Michez D, O'Connor R, Ollerton J, Paxton RJ, Poppy GM, Potts SG, Senapathi D, Shaw R, Dicks LV, Peh KS. Rapid assessment of insect pollination services to inform decision-making. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY : THE JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR CONSERVATION BIOLOGY 2022; 36:e13886. [PMID: 35075685 PMCID: PMC9542742 DOI: 10.1111/cobi.13886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Pollinator declines have prompted efforts to assess how land-use change affects insect pollinators and pollination services in agricultural landscapes. Yet many tools to measure insect pollination services require substantial landscape-scale data and technical expertise. In expert workshops, 3 straightforward methods (desk-based method, field survey, and empirical manipulation with exclusion experiments) for rapid insect pollination assessment at site scale were developed to provide an adaptable framework that is accessible to nonspecialist with limited resources. These methods were designed for TESSA (Toolkit for Ecosystem Service Site-Based Assessment) and allow comparative assessment of pollination services at a site of conservation interest and in its most plausible alternative state (e.g., converted to agricultural land). We applied the methods at a nature reserve in the United Kingdom to estimate the value of insect pollination services provided by the reserve. The economic value of pollination services provided by the reserve ranged from US$6163 to US$11,546/year. The conversion of the reserve to arable land would provide no insect pollination services and a net annual benefit from insect-pollinated crop production of approximately $1542/year (US$24∙ha-1 ∙year-1 ). The methods had wide applicability and were readily adapted to different insect-pollinated crops: rape (Brassica napus) and beans (Vicia faba) crops. All methods were rapidly employed under a low budget. The relatively less robust methods that required fewer resources yielded higher estimates of annual insect pollination benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizia Ratto
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Tom D. Breeze
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Lorna J. Cole
- Integrated Land Management, Environment & SocietySRUCAyrUK
| | - Michael P. D. Garratt
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - David Kleijn
- Resource Ecology GroupWageningen University and ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Bill Kunin
- School of Biology, Faculty of Biological SciencesUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| | - Denis Michez
- Laboratoire de ZoologieUniversité de MonsMonsBelgium
| | - Rory O'Connor
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Jeff Ollerton
- Faculty of Arts, Science and TechnologyUniversity of NorthamptonNorthamptonUK
| | - Robert J. Paxton
- General ZoologyMartin Luther University Halle‐Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
- German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle‐Jena‐LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | - Guy M. Poppy
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
| | - Simon G. Potts
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Deepa Senapathi
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, School of Agriculture, Policy and DevelopmentUniversity of ReadingReadingUK
| | - Rosalind Shaw
- Environment and Sustainability InstituteUniversity of ExeterPenrynUK
| | - Lynn V. Dicks
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
| | - Kelvin S.‐H. Peh
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of SouthamptonSouthamptonUK
- Conservation Science Group, Department of ZoologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Garratt MPD, de Groot GA, Albrecht M, Bosch J, Breeze TD, Fountain MT, Klein AM, McKerchar M, Park M, Paxton RJ, Potts SG, Pufal G, Rader R, Senapathi D, Andersson GKS, Bernauer OM, Blitzer EJ, Boreux V, Campbell AJ, Carvell C, Földesi R, García D, Garibaldi LA, Hambäck PA, Kirkitadze G, Kovács‐Hostyánszki A, Martins KT, Miñarro M, O’Connor R, Radzeviciute R, Roquer‐Beni L, Samnegård U, Scott L, Vereecken NJ, Wäckers F, Webber SM, Japoshvili G, Zhusupbaeva A. Opportunities to reduce pollination deficits and address production shortfalls in an important insect-pollinated crop. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS : A PUBLICATION OF THE ECOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 2021; 31:e02445. [PMID: 34448315 PMCID: PMC11475340 DOI: 10.1002/eap.2445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Pollinators face multiple pressures and there is evidence of populations in decline. As demand for insect-pollinated crops increases, crop production is threatened by shortfalls in pollination services. Understanding the extent of current yield deficits due to pollination and identifying opportunities to protect or improve crop yield and quality through pollination management is therefore of international importance. To explore the extent of "pollination deficits," where maximum yield is not being achieved due to insufficient pollination, we used an extensive dataset on a globally important crop, apples. We quantified how these deficits vary between orchards and countries and we compared "pollinator dependence" across different apple varieties. We found evidence of pollination deficits and, in some cases, risks of overpollination were even apparent for which fruit quality could be reduced by too much pollination. In almost all regions studied we found some orchards performing significantly better than others in terms of avoiding a pollination deficit and crop yield shortfalls due to suboptimal pollination. This represents an opportunity to improve production through better pollinator and crop management. Our findings also demonstrated that pollinator dependence varies considerably between apple varieties in terms of fruit number and fruit quality. We propose that assessments of pollination service and deficits in crops can be used to quantify supply and demand for pollinators and help to target local management to address deficits although crop variety has a strong influence on the role of pollinators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P. D. Garratt
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | - G. Arjen de Groot
- Wageningen Environmental Research (WENR)P.O. Box 476700 AAWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - Matthias Albrecht
- Eidgenössisches Departement für WirtschaftAgroscopeReckenholzstrasse 191CH‐8046ZürichSwitzerland
| | - Jordi Bosch
- CREAFUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaCerdanyola del Vallès08193CatalunyaSpain
| | - Tom D. Breeze
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra M. Klein
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape EcologyAlbert‐Ludwigs‐University79106FreiburgGermany
| | - Megan McKerchar
- Geography, Archaeology and the EnvironmentUniversity of WorcesterWorcesterWR2 6AJUnited Kingdom
| | - Mia Park
- Department of Biological SciencesNorth Dakota State UniversityFargoNorth Dakota58201USA
| | - Robert J. Paxton
- Institute for BiologyMartin Luther‐University Halle‐WittenbergHoher Weg 8Halle (Saale)06120Germany
| | - Simon G. Potts
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | - Gesine Pufal
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape EcologyAlbert‐Ludwigs‐University79106FreiburgGermany
| | - Romina Rader
- School of Environment and Rural ScienceUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleNew South Wales2351Australia
| | - Deepa Senapathi
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | | | - Olivia M. Bernauer
- Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentWestern Sydney UniversityRichmond2753New South WalesAustralia
| | | | - Virginie Boreux
- Chair of Nature Conservation and Landscape EcologyAlbert‐Ludwigs‐University79106FreiburgGermany
| | | | - Claire Carvell
- UK Centre for Ecology & HydrologyOX10 8BBWallingfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Rita Földesi
- Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research2163VácrátótHungary
| | - Daniel García
- Depto. Biología de Organismos y Sistemas (Universidad de Oviedo) and Instituto Mixto de Investigación en Biodiversidad (IMIB, CSIC‐Universidad de Oviedo‐Principado de Asturias)C/Catedrático Rodrigo Uría s/nOviedoE‐33006AsturiasSpain
| | - Lucas A. Garibaldi
- Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Instituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo RuralSan Carlos de BarilocheRío NegroArgentina
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasInstituto de Investigaciones en Recursos Naturales, Agroecología y Desarrollo RuralSan Carlos de BarilocheRío NegroArgentina
| | - Peter A. Hambäck
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant SciencesStockholm University106 91StockholmSweden
| | - Giorgi Kirkitadze
- Institute of EntomologyAgricultural University of Georgia0159TbilisiGeorgia
| | - Anikó Kovács‐Hostyánszki
- Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research2163VácrátótHungary
| | - Kyle T. Martins
- Department of BiologyMcGill UniversityMontréalH3A 0G4QuébecCanada
| | - Marcos Miñarro
- Servicio Regional de Investigación y Desarrollo Agroalimentario (SERIDA)Apdo. 13VillaviciosaE‐33300AsturiasSpain
| | - Rory O’Connor
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | - Rita Radzeviciute
- Molecular Evolution and Animal SystematicsInstitute of BiologyUniversity of LeipzigTalstraβe 3304103LeipzigGermany
| | - Laura Roquer‐Beni
- CREAFUniversitat Autònoma de BarcelonaCerdanyola del Vallès08193CatalunyaSpain
| | - Ulrika Samnegård
- Department of Ecology, Environment and Plant SciencesStockholm University106 91StockholmSweden
- Department of BiologyLund University223 62LundSweden
| | - Lorraine Scott
- School of Biological SciencesQueen’s University BelfastBT9 7BLBelfastUnited Kingdom
| | - Nicolas J. Vereecken
- Agroecology LabUniversité libre de Bruxelles (ULB)Boulevard du Triomphe CP 264/2B‐1050BrusselsBelgium
| | - Felix Wäckers
- Lancaster Environment CentreLancaster UniversityLA1 4YQLancasterUnited Kingdom
| | - Sean M. Webber
- Centre for Agri‐Environmental Research, SAPDUniversity of ReadingReadingRG6 6ARUnited Kingdom
| | - George Japoshvili
- Institute of EntomologyAgricultural University of Georgia0159TbilisiGeorgia
| | - Aigul Zhusupbaeva
- Academy of Public Administration under the President of the Kyrgyz Republic237 Panfilova str.BishkekKyrgyzstan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Buzz for Sustainability and Conservation: The Growing Potential of Citizen Science Studies on Bees. SUSTAINABILITY 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/su13020959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Expanding involvement of the public in citizen science projects can benefit both volunteers and professional scientists alike. Recently, citizen science has come into focus as an important data source for reporting and monitoring United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Since bees play an essential role in the pollination ecosystem service, citizen science projects involving them have a high potential for attaining SDGs. By performing a systematic review of citizen science studies on bees, we assessed how these studies could contribute towards SDG reporting and monitoring, and also verified compliance with citizen science principles. Eighty eight studies published from 1992 to 2020 were collected. SDG 15 (Life on Land) and SDG 17 (Partnerships) were the most outstanding, potentially contributing to targets related to biodiversity protection, restoration and sustainable use, capacity building and establishing multi stakeholder partnerships. SDG 2 (Zero Hunger), SDG 4 (Quality Education), and SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) were also addressed. Studies were found to produce new knowledge, apply methods to improve data quality, and invest in open access publishing. Notably, volunteer participation was mainly restricted to data collection. Further challenges include extending these initiatives to developing countries, where only a few citizen science projects are underway.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bishop J, Nakagawa S. Quantifying crop pollinator dependence and its heterogeneity using multi‐level meta‐analysis. J Appl Ecol 2021. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.13830] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Bishop
- School of Agriculture, Policy and Development University of Reading Reading Berkshire UK
| | - Shinichi Nakagawa
- School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences The University of New South Wales Sydney NSW Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Enhancing legume crop pollination and natural pest regulation for improved food security in changing African landscapes. GLOBAL FOOD SECURITY 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gfs.2020.100394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
8
|
Yield benefits of additional pollination to faba bean vary with cultivar, scale, yield parameter and experimental method. Sci Rep 2020; 10:2102. [PMID: 32034193 PMCID: PMC7005869 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-58518-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
The benefits of insect pollination to crop yield are used to justify management decisions across agricultural landscapes but current methods for assessing these benefits may underestimate the importance of context. We quantify how the effects of simulated insect pollination vary between five faba bean cultivars, and to what extent this changes between years, scales, yield parameters, and experimental methods. We do this by measuring responses to standardised hand pollination treatments in controlled experiments in flight cages and in the field. Pollination treatments generally improved yield, but in some cases yield was lower with additional pollination. Pollination dependence varied with cultivar, ranging from 58% (loss in yield mass per plant without pollination) in one cultivar, to a lower yield with pollination in another (−51%). Pollination dependence also varied between flight cage and field experiments (−10 to 37% in the same cultivar and year), year (4 to 33%; same cultivar and yield parameter), and yield parameter (−4 to 46%; same cultivar and year). This variability highlights that to be robust, assessments of pollination benefits need to focus upon marketable crop outputs at a whole-plant or larger scale while including and accounting for the effects of different years, sites, methodologies and cultivars.
Collapse
|