The therapeutic discharge II: An approach to documentation in the setting of feigned suicidal ideation

Consultation-Liaison Case Conference: A Case of Factitious Disorder Imposed on Self

We present the case of a young woman with an extensive medical history that most notably includes over 60 emergency-room visits for unfounded respiratory distress that often prompted intubations. Each presentation displays elements of deceitfulness or inappropriate demands that align with factitious disorder imposed on self. Top experts in the Consultation-Liaison field provide guidance for this commonly encountered clinical case based on their experience and review of available literature. Key teaching topics include a review of risk factors for development of deceptive syndromes, distinguishing factitious disorder from malingering and conversion disorder, and the role of a consulting psychiatrist in such cases. Patients with factitious disorder often show signs of pathologic lying, obstinance, and erratic behavior. Such attributes frequently arouse negative countertransference in providers, causing frustration and dread with continuing care, rendering psychiatric involvement. We address the unique challenges in managing factitious disorder and how to effectively collaborate with an interdisciplinary inpatient team with these cases.

The Diagnosis of Malingering in General Hospitals in the United States: A Retrospective Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample

Objective

To characterize the socio-demographics and comorbid medical and psychiatric diagnoses of patients in the general hospital diagnosed with malingering.

Method

We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study using data from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample, an all-payors database of acute care general hospital discharges in the United States, querying for patients aged 18 and older discharged with a diagnosis of "malingerer [conscious simulation]," ICD-10 code Z76.5.

Results

45,645 hospitalizations (95% CI: 43,503 to 47,787) during the study year included a discharge diagnosis of malingering. 56.1% were for male patients, and the median age was 43 years (IQR 33 to 54). Black patients represented 26.8% of the patients with a discharge diagnosis of malingering, compared to 14.9% of all patients sampled. Zip codes in the lowest household income quartile comprised 39.9% of malingering diagnoses. The top categories of primary discharge diagnoses of hospitalizations included medical ("Diabetes mellitus without complications"), psychiatric ("Depressive disorders"), and substance use ("Alcohol-related disorders") disorders. "Sepsis, unspecified organism," was the most common primary diagnosis.

Conclusion

The striking overrepresentation of Black patients in hospitalizations with diagnosis of malingering raises concern about the roles of implicit and systemic biases in assigning this label. The disproportionate number of patients of low socioeconomic status is further suggestive of bias and disparity. Another potential contribution is that the lower health literacy in these populations results in a limited knowledge of traditional ways to meet one's needs and thus greater reliance on malingered behavior as an alternative means. Accurate description of these patients' socio-demographics and comorbid medical and psychiatric diagnoses with reliable data from large samples can lead to improved understanding of how the malingering label is applied and ultimately better patient care.

Differentiating genuine from feigned suicidality in corrections: A necessary but perilous task

Feigning suicidality is common among patients in correctional settings, but there has been little discussion on the differences between genuine and feigned presentations of suicidality. Differentiating suicidality from feigned suicidality is among the riskiest diagnostic challenges. Still, some headway can be made if we compare features of genuine suicidality with those of feigned presentations. To this end, I first describe a typical profile of suicidality. Next, I contrast it with the features that correctional patients who feign suicidality display in California's prison health care system. I also outline the dangers involved in identifying feigned suicidality, and I offer some ways in which to understand feigned suicidality in corrections.

Malpractice Liability Due to Patient Violence

In an era of mass shootings and increasing public fear, psychiatrists are more often being asked to assess whether an individual is safe to return to school or work. In addition, assessment of the individual's risk of violence is required in daily clinical decisions regarding the need for hospital care. Given the inherent difficulty in predicting violence, mental health clinicians worry about potential liability that could result from their patient committing a violent act. This article provides an overview of malpractice liability for patient violence, violence risk factors, and principles of violence risk assessment. The authors also offer some practical risk management strategies to reduce clinicians' risk of liability for violent acts by patients.