Delirium in the Hospitalized Elder and Recommendations for Practice

Factors Associated with Improvement in Activities of Daily Living during Hospitalization: A Retrospective Study of Older Patients with Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

In this study, we aimed to examine the changes in delirium during hospitalization of patients and its association with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), as well as improvements in activities of daily living (ADL).

METHODS

A longitudinal, retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 83 older adults (≥65 years) with hip fractures. We collected Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Functional Independence Measure-motor domain (m-FIM) assessment results from the medical charts at two time points: baseline (first week of hospitalization) and pre-discharge (final week before discharge). Additionally, we collected data on delirium and BPSD at three points: baseline, week 2 post-admission, and pre-discharge. We performed univariate logistic regression analysis using changes in m-FIM scores as the dependent variable and MMSE and m-FIM scores at baseline and pre-discharge, along with delirium and BPSD subtypes at baseline, week 2 post-admission, and pre-discharge, as the explanatory variables. Finally, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis incorporating the significant variables from the univariate analysis to identify factors associated with ADL improvement during hospitalization.

RESULTS

We observed significant correlations between ADL improvement during hospitalization and baseline m-FIM and MMSE scores, hypoactive delirium state, and BPSD subtype pre-discharge. Notably, all participants with hypoactive symptoms before discharge exhibited some subtype of delirium and BPSD at baseline.

CONCLUSION

Besides ADL ability and cognitive function at admission, the presence of hypoactive delirium and BPSD subtype before discharge may hinder ADL improvement during hospitalization.

Drug-related problems of antipsychotics in treating delirium among elderly patients: A real-world observational study

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Delirium is more common and life-threatening among the elderly. Currently, no other medications, including antipsychotics, have been approved for delirium. The number of practice guidelines recommends antipsychotics to be the first option among selected patients. This study aimed to identify the type of drug-related problems (DRPs) concerning antipsychotics use among elderly patients with delirium.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted by collecting data from 2013 to 2016 in Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Thailand. Inpatients who were 60 years and over, diagnosed with delirium by ICD-10 diseases coding F05.X and treated with antipsychotics for delirium were included. A modified version of the American Society of Hospital Pharmacists classification criteria (mASHP-delirium) was used.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 379 patients were enrolled. Mean daily dose of haloperidol (oral) was 1.06 ± 1.33 mg, haloperidol (intramuscular) 2.71 ± 1.88 mg, haloperidol (intravenous; IV) 3.42 ± 1.97 mg, risperidone was 0.71 ± 0.52 mg, and quetiapine was 19.26 ± 15.63 mg. Among all, 427 events were classified as DRPs. The most common DRPs included inappropriate duration, dose, route of administration or dosage form accounting for the 416 events (97.4%), followed by actual adverse drug reactions (extrapyramidal symptoms; EPS), 6 events (1.4%) and potential drug-drug interactions for 5 events (1.2%). Of those 416 events, 200 events (48.1%) antipsychotics were continued after discharge and continued for more than 10 days. Dosage exceeding initial dose or maximum daily dose accounted for 179 events (43.0%). Other DRPs such as inappropriate route haloperidol IV and receiving the extended-release dosage form of quetiapine involve 26 (6.3%) and 11 (2.6%) events, respectively.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using mASHP-delirium to identify DRPs of antipsychotics in treating delirium among elderly patients. Several DRPs were found that might lead to severe adverse drug reactions, particularly EPS and QTc interval prolongation. However, all DRPs could be prevented by developing antipsychotic setting protocols and specialty consulting systems to communicate among healthcare providers caring for vulnerable groups of patients. In addition, a prospective pharmacist intervention is required.

Inpatient Rehabilitation Delirium Screening: Impact on Acute Care Transfers and Functional Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Delirium is well studied in the acute care setting, but there is limited understanding of its impact in the postacute care setting, particularly in the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the prevalence and related outcomes of delirium in the IRF setting, particularly patients' transfers to acute care hospitals.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A freestanding IRF.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients discharged from an IRF between January 2016 and December 2016 (12 months).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Transfer to acute care hospitals, motor and cognitive Functional Independence Measures (FIM), length of stay, discharge disposition.

RESULTS

A total of 1567 patients (53.9% female, mean age 72.9 ± 13.9) were included in the analysis. Positive scores were found among 142 (9.1%) patients on a 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM), indicating delirium on admission. Fifty-nine (3.8%) were unscorable on 3D-CAM. Twice as many delirium patients were transferred to acute care hospitals compared to non-delirium patients (22.5% vs. 10.8%, P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression showed that, for patients with 3D-CAM positive scores, there was an increased risk of transfers to acute care hospitals at an odds ratio of 1.61 (1.03-2.53, P = .04) after adjusting for age, gender, neurological diagnosis, and motor FIM score. The delirium group also showed lower gains in motor function, increased lengths of stay, and reduced discharges to home when compared to the non-delirium group (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study finds that delirium on admission to an IRF is associated with worsened outcomes related to function, length of stay, discharge status, and transfer to acute care hospitals. Positive delirium screening is an independent predictor for transfer to acute care hospitals from an IRF. Early identification of delirium is recommended in order to mitigate preventable transfers.

Training students to detect delirium: An interprofessional pilot study

AIM

The purpose of this paper is to report nursing student knowledge acquisition and attitude after completing and interprofessional simulation with medical students.

INTRODUCTION

The IOM has challenged healthcare educators to teach teamwork and communication skills in interprofessional settings. Interprofessional simulation provides a higher fidelity experience than simulation in silos. Simulation may be particularly useful in helping healthcare workers gain the necessary skills to care for psychiatric clients. Specifically, healthcare providers have difficulty differentiating between dementia and delirium. Recognizing this deficit, an interprofessional simulation was created using medical students in their neurology rotation and senior nursing students.

METHOD

Twenty-four volunteer nursing students completed a pre-survey to assess delirium knowledge and then completed an education module about delirium. Twelve of these students participated in a simulation with medicine students. Pre and Post Kid SIM Attitude questionnaires were completed by all students participating in the simulation. After the simulations were complete, all twenty-four students were asked to complete the post-survey regarding delirium knowledge.

RESULTS

While delirium knowledge scores improved in both groups, the simulation group scored higher, but the difference did not reach significance. The simulation group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in attitudes toward simulation, interprofessional education, and teamwork post simulation compared to their pre-simulation scores.

CONCLUSION

Nursing students who participated in an interprofessional simulation developed a heightened appreciation for learning communication, teamwork, situational awareness, and interprofessional roles and responsibilities. These results support the use of interprofessional simulation in healthcare education.

Delirium in critical care: a study of incidence, prevalence, and associated factors in the tertiary care hospital of older Thai adults

OBJECTIVES

Delirium is a common condition in older adults which can have devastating outcomes. The studies about delirium in intensive care units (ICU) are relatively rare compared to studies in the non-ICU setting. This study aimed to study the prevalence, incidence, and risk factors of delirium among older Thai adults in ICU.

METHOD

Participants were older patients who were admitted to the ICU of Srinagarind Medical School, KhonKaen, Thailand from May 2013 to August 2014. Baseline characteristics were collected. Delirium was rated by trained clinical researchers using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU). Demographic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Regression analyses were used to analyze the outcomes.

RESULTS

Delirium occurred in 44 of 99 patients (44.4%) with an incidence rate of 22.2% (22/99). The prevalence of delirium in mechanically ventilated patients was 62.5% (30/48). The majority of the patients had delirium within five days of ICU admission. Seven independent predisposing factors were identified using bivariate regressions: age, functional status, disease severity, having pneumonia, cognitive impairment, depression, or previous stroke. Numbers of additional drugs, bed changes, physical restraints, sleep deprivation, use of bladder catheters, and patients with mechanical ventilators were independent precipitating factors. For multivariate regressions, previous stroke, multiple bed changes, and physical restraints were the significant factors.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence and incidence of delirium of older adults in the ICU setting in this study was high and comparable to prior studies. There are several significant risk factors associated with delirium which could be modified. These factors should be considered when designing effective preventive strategies of delirium.

Under-recognition of delirium in older adults by nurses in the intensive care unit setting

BACKGROUND

Nurses have the key roles to detect delirium in hospitalized older patients but under-recognition of delirium among nurses is prevalent. The objectives of this study were to identify the under-recognition rate of delirium by intensive care nurses (ICU) using Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU (CAM-ICU) and factors associated with under-recognition.

METHODS

Participants were older patients aged ≥65 years who were admitted to the ICU of Srinagarind Medical School, Khon Kaen, Thailand from May 2013 to August 2014. Baseline characteristics were collected. Delirium was rated by a trained clinical researcher using the CAM-ICU. Demographic data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multiple logistic regressions were used to analyze the outcomes.

RESULTS

Delirium occurred in 44 of 99 patients (44.4 %). Nurses could not identify delirium in 29.6 % of patients compared with researchers. Pre-existing dementia and depression were found in 47.7 % of patients. Pneumonia or other causes of respiratory failure were the most common causes of admission to ICU (47.7 %). Independent factors associated with under-recognition by nurses were identified-heart failure [adjusted odds ratio (OR), 77.8; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.5-2,543, p = 0.01] and pre-existing taking treatment with benzodiazepines (adjusted OR, 22.6; 95 % CI 1.8-85, p = 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Under-recognition of delirium is a frequent issue. New independent factors associated with under-recognition were identified. Awareness of delirium in the patients with these factors is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports the finding of high under-recognition rates of delirium among hospitalized older adults in ICU. Patients with heart failure and receiving benzodiazepines were identified as barriers of recognition of delirium.

Assessment and Management of Delirium in Older Adults in the Emergency Department: Literature Review to Inform Development of a Novel Clinical Protocol

Delirium occurs frequently in older patients in the emergency department (ED), is underrecognized, and has potentially serious consequences. Despite its seriousness, delirium is frequently missed by emergency providers, and patients with unrecognized delirium are often discharged from the ED. Even when it is appropriately recognized, managing delirium in older adults poses a significant challenge for ED providers. Geriatric delirium is typically caused by the interaction of multiple factors, including several that are commonly missed: pain, urinary retention, constipation, dehydration, and polypharmacy. Appropriate management includes nonpharmacological management with medication intervention reserved for emergencies. We have developed a new, comprehensive, evidence-based protocol for diagnosis/recognition, management, and disposition of geriatric delirium patients in the ED with a focus on identifying and treating commonly missed contributing causes.

Factors that contribute to underrecognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings: a scoping review of the literature to explain this phenomenon

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

In order to obtain more information regarding this phenomenon, a scoping review of the literature was undertaken to analyse current research on the recognition of delirium by registered nurses in acute care settings.

BACKGROUND

Delirium is often manifested as a sign of an underlying undiagnosed condition that requires immediate intervention and is frequently manifested in acute care settings. Unfortunately, registered nurses often do not recognise delirium and its occurrence goes under-reported.

DESIGN/METHODS

Based on six inclusion criteria, a search in numerous databases using terms such as delirium detection, recognition and diagnosis by registered nurses was undertaken. Eight quantitative studies were deemed relevant and analysed for this scoping review.

RESULTS

Seven major categories emerged: the fluctuating nature of delirium, the impact of delirium education on its recognition, communication barriers, inadequate use of delirium assessment tools, lack of conceptual understanding of delirium, delirium as a burden and the likeness of delirium and dementia. A brief summary of the findings in each category is reported here.

CONCLUSIONS

The scoping review revealed that delirium remains underrecognised by registered nurses, which potentially contributes to reduced quality of nursing care for clients experiencing this condition. Further research on delirium and the processes that registered nurses use to recognise it is timely and will facilitate the development of evidence-based interventions to manage it.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

While acute care registered nurses have historically reported dramatic changes in cognitive and neuro-biological functions in ill older adults, the literature highlighted in this scoping review revealed the following: (1) the need for further research to validate delirium assessment tools and, (2) the need for education and training for registered nurses on the use of these assessment tools to promote early recognition and thereby decrease the incidence of delirium in older adults.

A nationwide study on delirium in psychiatric patients from 1995 to 2011

OBJECTIVES

Delirium shares symptoms with some mental illnesses. This may lead to misdiagnosis of delirium in psychiatric patients and a risk of inadequate management. Moreover, literature on delirium in psychiatric patients is sparse. The aim was to analyse possible changes in the diagnostic incidence of delirium in psychiatric patients from 1995 to 2011, and to investigate the patients with regard to sex, age, and type of patient.

METHODS

All first time ever diagnoses of delirium among psychiatric patients were identified in the nationwide Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register (DPCRR) from 1995 to 2011. The delirium diagnoses include (1) delirium unspecified, (2) delirium with dementia, and (3) drug-related delirium, all in accordance with International Classification of Diseases-10. The incidence rates were age standardised.

RESULTS

A total of 15 680 persons diagnosed with delirium for the first time were identified in the DPCRR between 1995 and 2011. The total incidence rate of delirium has decreased, reaching 8.4/1000 person-years in 2011. In 2011, 2.6% of the demented patients were diagnosed with delirium with dementia. Diagnosis of delirium is significantly more common in men, and the three groups of delirium showed a characteristic age distribution.

CONCLUSION

Our incidences were markedly lower when compared with previous studies. This suggests a possible underdiagnosis of delirium in psychiatric hospitals and should be investigated further, as delirium is a serious state and identifying the syndrome is important for sufficient treatment.

Delirium: underrecognized and undertreated

Delirium is a complex neuropsychiatric syndrome presenting primarily with disturbances of cognition, perception and sensorium, alertness, sleep/wake cycle, and psychomotor behavior in the context of a medical etiology. The presentation can be quite variable among patients and even within a given patient because of its waxing and waning course. This variability and overlap with other psychiatric syndromes has led to substantial underrecognition and undertreatment in clinical settings. Considering the significant morbidity and mortality associated with delirium and its tremendous economic burden, the failure to diagnose, refer, and treat such patients represents a critically important public health care issue. Clinicians should be systematically educated about delirium symptoms. Also, caregivers and family members of medically compromised patients should be educated about recognizing delirium. The use of structured diagnostic instruments and scales to follow the severity of symptoms has been an improvement in the field. However, much more research is needed into the use of such instruments and how they can be applied to clinical situations to improve the detection and treatment of delirium. Similarly, research is warranted that focuses on preventing delirium, potentially by identifying susceptible patients and intervening early. It is particularly challenging to devise cost-effective interventions for preventing and identifying delirium early in its course, given the rapid pace and resource limitations in inpatient and intensive care settings, and current data do not clearly indicate that such systems have proven benefit. Still, the indisputable health and financial costs of delirium indicate that prevention and identification should be a high priority.

A volunteer-based Hospital Elder Life Program to reduce delirium

A community hospital with nearly 50% of its admitted patients 70 years or older adapted the well-established Hospital Elder Life Program (HELP). The primary adaptation entailed an enhanced participation of trained volunteers in HELP interventions designed to prevent and reduce delirium. Integral program elements include detailed volunteer training, required demonstration of competencies, and regular evaluation and feedback of volunteers provided by program staff. Nurse satisfaction with HELP increased from 64% to 91% in the second year of implementation, and a survey of patients and families indicated that 95% were satisfied with HELP. This innovative volunteer-assisted model of elder care support was positively embraced by patients, their families, and the nursing staff and supported by nursing administration. The use of volunteers is a cost-effective method of enhancing the nursing care of vulnerable elders during hospitalization.

Impaired mobility, ASA status and administration of tramadol are risk factors for postoperative delirium in patients aged 75 years or more after major abdominal surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this prospective study was to determine incidence, duration, and risk factors for postoperative delirium (PD) in elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The incidence and risk factors of PD after major abdominal surgery in elderly patients are not well documented.

METHODS

From May 2006 to May 2008, 118 patients aged 75 years or more without severe preoperative cognitive dysfunction (mini mental state examination score >10/30) and undergoing major elective abdominal surgery were included. The preoperative geriatric assessment battery consisted of 4 tests evaluating physical (instrumental activities of daily living and timed get up and go test score) and cognitive function (mini mental state examination score), and detecting the presence of an underlying depression (Short-GDS). After the operation, geriatric patients were assessed for PD by the Confusion Assessment Method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine risk factors for PD.

RESULTS

Overall, PD occurred in 28 patients (24%). Multivariate analysis showed that an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3-4 (P = 0.02), impaired mobility (timed get up and go test score >20 seconds) (P = 0.009) and postoperative tramadol administration (P = 0.0009) were risk factors for PD. The mortality rate was 14% in 28 patients with PD and 3.3% in 90 patients without PD (P = 0.051). The morbidity rate was 35.5% in 28 patients with PD and 32% in 90 patients without PD (NS). The mean hospital stay was 19 +/- 11 days for patients with PD and 14 +/- 8 for patients without PD (P = 0.01). Fifteen of 24 (62.5%) surviving patients with PD and 28 of 87 (32%) surviving patients without PD were discharged to geriatric rehabilitation unit (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

PD is a frequent and severe postoperative event in elderly patients after major abdominal surgery. A perioperative geriatric assessment should be recommended to patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3-4 and preoperative impaired mobility to facilitate the management of PD. In these patients, the postoperative administration of tramadol should be avoided.

Nursing care, delirium, and pain management for the hospitalized older adult

Delirium is a reversible cognitive disorder that has a rapid onset. Delirium risk factors include older age, severity of illness, poorer baseline functional status, comorbid medical conditions, and dementia. There are adverse consequences of delirium, including increased length of stay and increased mortality. Therefore, it is important for nurses to identify clients at risk and prevent and manage delirium in the hospitalized older client. Once high-risk clients are identified, prevention strategies may be used to reduce the incidence. Examples of prevention strategies include providing glasses and working hearing aids and effective pain management. This article discusses various assessment instruments that detect the presence of delirium. With this information, nurses are better equipped to evaluate the best assessment options for their work setting. Early detection is crucial to reduce the adverse consequences of delirium. Once a client is found to be experiencing delirium, a treatment plan can be established using both nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic interventions. In addition, the identification and the correction of etiologies of delirium can shorten the course of delirium.

Double trouble: when delirium complicates dementia

Learn to protect a patient with dementia from the disabling effects of delirium.

Delirium: where do we stand?

Clinicians are likely to encounter delirium frequently, particularly in inpatient and intensive care settings. However, delirium is underrecognized and undertreated because of its heterogeneous and fluctuating presentation and due to the limitations in resources and training in contemporary clinical settings. Translation of current knowledge about delirium into clinical practice may improve patient care and benefit public health economics. Hence, this review comprehensively discusses the phenomenology and pathophysiology of delirium and its presenting features, risk factors, differential diagnoses, assessment, prognosis, and treatment with antipsychotics; the goal is to facilitate better prevention, recognition, and treatment of delirium. Available research is reviewed, limitations of the research are discussed, and future directions for further delirium research are identified.

Outcomes at 12 months in a population of elderly patients discharged from a rehabilitation unit

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the cognitive, functional, and clinical variables associated with the risk of institutionalization, rehospitalization, and death at 12 months among a population of elderly discharged from a Rehabilitation and Aged Care Unit (RACU) within a 1-year period (May 1, 2004 to April 30, 2005). The RACU is a relatively new setting of care providing intensive rehabilitation and clinical support to elderly with highly heterogeneous reasons for admission.

METHODS

There were 1303 patients (> or =65 years old) contacted 12 months after discharge from the RACU. We obtained information about institutionalization, rehospitalization, and death. Predictors were all the demographic and clinical variables potentially related to these outcomes. The relationship among predictors and outcomes was tested with multiple stepwise logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Among the 1072 patients alive at the 12-month follow-up, 90 (8.4%) were institutionalized (3.4% early at discharge and 4.9% within the next period). The logistic regression analysis showed that 2 ranges of age (78 to 83 years and 84 years or more), living alone, occurrence of delirium, cognitive impairment (Mini Mental State Examination lower or equal to 20/30), and poor functional status at discharge (Barthel Index scores ranging from 69 to 85 and Barthel Index scores lower than 68/100) were independently and significantly associated with the risk of institutionalization during the 12 months following discharge from the RACU. Three hundred and twenty-three (30.1%) patients had been rehospitalized once and 86 (8.0%) patients twice at the 12-month follow-up. In the multivariate analysis, comorbidity (Charlson Index scores ranging from 2 to 3 and Charlson Index scores higher than 4) and delirium were significantly and independently associated with this outcome. One hundred and thirty-six (11.3%) patients had died by the 12-month follow-up. The stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age greater than 83 years, poor functional status (Barthel Index lower than 60/100 at discharge), high comorbidity (Charlson Index scores ranging from 3 to 4 and Charlson Index scores higher than 4, respectively), and albumin serum levels ranging from 3.2 to 2.9 mg/dL and lower than 2.9 mg/dL independently and significantly predicted the 12-month risk of death. Absence of depressive symptoms (Geriatric Depression Scale <2/15) had instead a protective effect.

CONCLUSION

Variables related to the sociodemographic, cognitive, functional, and health status predicted, with different degree of association, the 12-month risk of institutionalization, rehospitalization, and death among a population of elderly patients discharged from a RACU. Accordingly, various clinical and organizational approaches may be planned for prevention.