Drivers and restrainers to adoption and spread of evidence-based health service delivery interventions: The case of CAPABLE

Correlates of self-perceptions of aging in dementia caregivers: findings from the German Aging Survey

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the associations between dementia caregivers' self-perceptions of aging (SPAs) and demographic, care related, and stress variables.

METHODS

Cross-sectional (2021) data collected online and from the German Aging Study comprising 190 dementia caregivers (Mean age= 65.69 years; SD= 10.11) were used. Predictive variables were age, sex, education, marital status, type of district of residence, caregiving hours per week, relationship to the person with dementia, care burden, and the Relative Stress Scale. Outcome variables were one item assessing felt age, the Lawton's Attitudes toward Own Aging Scale, and the age-related cognitions scales. Univariable, multivariable, and multivariate linear regression models were used.

RESULTS

Multivariable and multivariate linear regression models showed that those dementia caregivers who are older, have lower education, experience higher levels of caregiving-related burden and stress, and live in urban compared to rural districts, experience more negative SPAs compared to dementia caregivers without these characteristics. Associations were of moderate size for stress and of small size for the remaining variables.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that key characteristics in dementia caregivers are associated with more negative SPAs. Given that more negative SPAs are associated with poorer health outcomes, these individuals may benefit the most from interventions promoting positive SPAs.

The Intersection of Successful Aging and Family Caregiving

For the millions of older adults who rely on the support of a family caregiver, successful aging is not an individual achievement but a cooperative process between a care receiver and a caregiver. Yet, family caregivers are rarely incorporated into theoretical models of successful aging. Family caregivers also play an essential role in recent healthcare delivery movements that seek to better align care delivery with successful aging. Greater reliance on family caregivers by the U.S. healthcare system is occurring as an increasingly vocal constituency is tasking policymakers with developing and implementing federal and state health policies that would help build the national infrastructure needed to support them. This paper provides a critical discussion of how family caregivers actualize successful aging for older adults. We highlight the key role of family caregivers in healthcare delivery innovations aimed at facilitating successful aging and discuss policies that support family caregivers. As successful aging continues to evolve as a dominating framework in the literature, we conclude with key recommendations for how research, policy, and practice efforts in successful aging can be more inclusive and supportive of family caregivers.

"What choice do we have?" Reactive and proactive decision-making for aging in place with dementia

BACKGROUND

Promoting options for aging in place (AIP) has broad appeal to policymakers and professionals providing services to persons living with dementia (PWD). However, the benefits or burdens of AIP likely vary among individuals and families. We sought to describe factors influencing decision-making to age in place versus seek a higher level of residential care for PWD.

METHODS

A qualitative study was undertaken as part of a larger mixed-methods study utilizing semi-structured interviews with PWD, family care partners, and dementia clinicians. Interview transcripts were analyzed using qualitative content analysis with constant comparison. Sample size was determined by thematic saturation within subgroups.

RESULTS

We conducted 74 interviews among 14 PWD, 36 care partners, and 24 clinicians. Preferences for AIP were driven by (1) desire to preserve independence, (2) a sense that the "best care" is delivered by loved ones and in a familiar environment, (3) distrust and fear of care facilities, and (4) caregiver guilt. PWD and care partners frequently considered moving from home as a "last resort" and wanted to avoid planning for future care needs. Many decisions to move were reactive and triggered by patient safety events, physical dependency, or the loss of caregiver. Proactive decision-making was facilitated by (1) prior experience witnessing the challenges of caring for a person with advanced dementia in the home; and (2) having substantial financial resources such that participants could seek major home adaptations or avoid "lower quality" institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

Decisions regarding care setting for PWD frequently do not feel like a choice and are made under imperfect conditions. Programs using AIP as an outcome measure should recognize the various patient-centered and non-patient-centered factors that influence such choices, and interventions should be designed to promote more informed and equitable decision-making for care setting in dementia.

Residential Relocation of Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Role of Physical Function and the Housing Environment

OBJECTIVE

Most older adults in the United States (U.S.) prefer to remain in their current housing as they age, but difficulty with mobility (e.g., walking) may make this more challenging. We estimated the association between difficulty with mobility (mobility) and residential relocation in the following year.

METHODS

We included adults aged ≥65 participating in ≥2 rounds (years 2011-2019) of the National Health and Aging Trends Study. Mobility was self-reported and change in permanent address was captured by study staff. We used a prospective cohort design and logistic regression with a clustering correction to estimate adjusted associations.

RESULTS

We did not find evidence that mobility was associated with relocation versus no relocation in our sample of 26,444 observations from 5699 older adults. However, mobility was positively associated with moves to housing with fewer environmental barriers.

DISCUSSION

Mobility is associated with relocation to housing that is more accessible and may be an indicator of greater need for supports to age in place.

Feasibility of Implementing Dementia Collaborative Coaching into Routine Care in Nursing Homes

OBJECTIVES

The study evaluated the feasibility of implementing Dementia Collaborative Coaching (DCC) into the routine workflow of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) working in nursing homes (NHs). DCC is an intervention delivered by SLPs to train nursing assistants (CNAs) in communication strategies to support people living with dementia (PLWD).

METHODS

We assessed the feasibility of identifying eligible PLWD; estimated intervention fidelity; evaluated suitability of outcome measures; and determined the preliminary impact on behavioral and psychological symptoms of distress (BPSD) among PLWD. SLPs completed a semi-structured interview to collect further acceptability data.

RESULTS

Four SLPs in four NHs completed DCC with 10 CNAs and 15 eligible PLWD that they appropriately identified from their caseloads. SLPs conducted 90 DCC sessions with 64% fidelity and billed Medicare for all sessions. The outcome measure of Minimum Data Set item E0200B: Rejection of Care did not vary enough to be useful, but positive changes were noted on the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory, t(14) = 10.51, p < .001, Cohen's d = 2.76. Interviews further indicated feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to implement DCC into the workflow of SLPs in NHs.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Given the feasibility and preliminary positive impacts, SLPs could consider implementing DCC in routine care.

Structural housing elements associated with injuries in older adults in the USA

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the unintentional injuries associated with housing elements among older adults treated in US hospital emergency departments (EDs). To identify modifiable home hazards.

METHODS

The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) coding manual was reviewed to identify all codes associated with housing elements that were permanently attached to a home. We queried the 2020 NEISS data for older adults (aged 65 and older) to determine the number of injuries associated with each element. The 10 elements involved in the most hospitalisations and the most ED visits were each tabulated by the number of records in the NEISS sample and national estimate, yielding two separate lists of 10 housing elements. A review of case narratives was conducted on a random selection constituting 10% of all records or a minimum of 100 records to determine common precipitating factors and prevention recommendations.

RESULTS

From the two lists, we identified 11 housing elements most commonly associated with housing-related injuries, resulting in ED visits or hospitalisations. The housing element most associated with housing-related injuries was floor, leading to 929 937 ED visits. Subsequent case narrative review yielded prevention recommendations, including modifications that support balance and fall recovery, reduce the need to reach and improve visibility.

CONCLUSIONS

Housing element-related injuries affect hundreds of thousands of older adults. Case narratives reveal falls, tripping/slipping and sliding injuries that can potentially be prevented with home modification. NEISS is a valuable tool to identify injury risks in the home.

Staff Perspectives on Dementia Care in Nursing Homes: A Pre-Implementation, Content Analysis Study Guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model

PURPOSE

To assess implementation context prior to the implementation of Dementia Collaborative Coaching (DCC), a person-centered, communication coaching intervention for speech-language pathologists, certified nursing assistants, and people living with dementia in nursing homes.

METHODS

This was a pre-implementation, content analysis of focus groups. Focus group questions and subsequent analysis were guided by the Practical, Robust Implementation and Sustainability Model.

RESULTS

Employees (N = 27) from three nursing homes participated in five focus groups. Five themes from directed content analysis included (a) Dementia Care Needs Improvement; (b) Dementia Collaborative Coaching Appears Promising; (c) Awareness of Necessary Implementation and Sustainability Plans; (d) Regulations Need Accurate Interpretation and Local Dissemination; and (e) Appropriate Staffing Concerns.

CONCLUSION/IMPLICATIONS

Key factors related to the implementation of DCC included a perceived tension for change from staff to improve dementia care, concerns about appropriate staffing, and the need for explicit implementation and sustainability plans. The importance of continuing education with specific attention to temporary staff was also found to be a necessary element to support better uptake of the person-centered intervention. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 50(2), 5-9.].

Implementing CAPABLE With Care Partners Through an Area Agency on Aging: Identifying Barriers and Facilitators Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Community Aging in Place, Advancing Better Living for Elders (CAPABLE) is an evidence-based intervention to promote aging in place. Although CAPABLE has been implemented in more than 40 community sites, wide variation in implementation exists. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), this study sought to determine key barriers and facilitators that may influence CAPABLE implementation with older adult and care partner dyads through an area agency on aging (AAA).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A formative evaluation was completed using qualitative data from the pilot of a Hybrid Trial Type 1 study implementing CAPABLE in an AAA. Multiple sources of data were collected, including 2 focus groups, field notes, a tracking log, and meetings with CAPABLE interventionists. Data were analyzed using a framework method and validated through a negative case analysis approach in NVivo 12 Pro.

RESULTS

Fourteen dyads enrolled in the pilot and 6 completed the CAPABLE intervention. Key themes aligned with 10 constructs from 5 domains of the CFIR. Facilitators included adaptability of the intervention, cost, networks and communication, and knowledge and belief of individuals. Barriers included intervention complexity, client needs and resources, and executing the planned process.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

Results enhance understanding of contextual factors that can influence the implementation of CAPABLE with care partners. Strategies to overcome barriers include simplifying recruitment materials and targeting older adults with recent onset of disability. The CFIR is a valuable resource for planning and evaluation of the implementation of evidence-based interventions to promote aging in place.