Growth hormone replacement may influence the biological action of thyroid hormone on liver and bone tissue

Dental implant considerations in patients with systemic diseases: An updated comprehensive review

BACKGROUND

Various medical conditions and the drugs used to treat them have been shown to impede or complicate dental implant surgery. It is crucial to carefully monitor the medical status and potential post-operative complications of patients with systemic diseases, particularly elderly patients, to minimize the risk of health complications that may arise.

AIM

The purpose of this study was to review the existing evidence on the viability of dental implants in patients with systemic diseases and to provide practical recommendations to achieve the best possible results in the corresponding patient population.

METHODS

The information for our study was compiled using data from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases and searched separately for each systemic disease included in our work until October 2023. An additional manual search was also performed to increase the search sensitivity. Only English-language publications were included and assessed according to titles, abstracts and full texts.

RESULTS

In total, 6784 studies were found. After checking for duplicates and full-text availability, screening for the inclusion criteria and manually searching reference lists, 570 articles remained to be considered in this study.

CONCLUSION

In treating patients with systemic conditions, the cost-benefit analysis should consider the patient's quality of life and expected lifespan. The success of dental implants depends heavily on ensuring appropriate maintenance therapy, ideal oral hygiene standards, no smoking and avoiding other risk factors. Indications and contraindications for dental implants in cases of systemic diseases are yet to be more understood; broader and hardcore research needs to be done for a guideline foundation.

Lipoprotein(a)-60 Years Later-What Do We Know?

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) molecule includes two protein components: apolipoprotein(a) and apoB100. The molecule is the main transporter of oxidized phospholipids (OxPL) in plasma. The concentration of this strongly atherogenic lipoprotein is predominantly regulated by the LPA gene expression. Lp(a) is regarded as a risk factor for several cardiovascular diseases. Numerous epidemiological, clinical and in vitro studies showed a strong association between increased Lp(a) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), calcific aortic valve disease/aortic stenosis (CAVD/AS), stroke, heart failure or peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Although there are acknowledged contributions of Lp(a) to the mentioned diseases, clinicians struggle with many inconveniences such as a lack of well-established treatment lowering Lp(a), and common guidelines for diagnosing or assessing cardiovascular risk among both adult and pediatric patients. Lp(a) levels are different with regard to a particular race or ethnicity and might fluctuate during childhood. Furthermore, the lack of standardization of assays is an additional impediment. The review presents the recent knowledge on Lp(a) based on clinical and scientific research, but also highlights relevant aspects of future study directions that would approach more suitable and effective managing risk associated with increased Lp(a), as well as control the Lp(a) levels.

Effects of Lipid-Modifying and Other Drugs on Lipoprotein(a) Levels-Potent Clinical Implications

The past few years have shown an ongoing interest in lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), a lipid molecule that has been proven to have atherogenic, thrombogenic, and inflammatory properties. Several lines of evidence, indeed, have demonstrated an increased risk of cardiovascular disease as well as calcific aortic valve stenosis in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels. Statins, the mainstay of lipid-lowering therapy, slightly increase Lp(a) levels, while most other lipid-modifying agents do not significantly alter Lp(a) concentrations, except for proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors. The latter have been shown to reduce Lp(a) levels; however, the clinical significance of this effect has not been clearly elucidated. Of note, the pharmaceutical lowering of Lp(a) may be achieved with novel treatments specifically designed for this purpose (i.e., antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)). Large clinical trials with cardiovascular outcomes with these agents are ongoing, and their results are eagerly awaited. Furthermore, several non-lipid-modifying drugs of various classes may influence Lp(a) concentrations. We have searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases up to 28 January 2023 and summarized the effects of established and emerging lipid-modifying drugs and other medications on Lp(a) levels. We also discuss the potent clinical implications of these alterations.

Non-genetic influences on lipoprotein(a) concentrations

An elevated level of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically regulated, independent, causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease. However, the extensive variability in Lp(a) levels between individuals and population groups cannot be fully explained by genetic factors, emphasizing a potential role for non-genetic factors. In this review, we provide an overview of current evidence on non-genetic factors influencing Lp(a) levels with a particular focus on diet, physical activity, hormones and certain pathological conditions. Findings from randomized controlled clinical trials show that diets lower in saturated fats modestly influence Lp(a) levels and often in the opposing direction to LDL cholesterol. Results from studies on physical activity/exercise have been inconsistent, ranging from no to minimal or moderate change in Lp(a) levels, potentially modulated by age and the type, intensity, and duration of exercise modality. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women lowers Lp(a) levels with oral being more effective than transdermal estradiol; the type of HRT, dose of estrogen and addition of progestogen do not modify the Lp(a)-lowering effect of HRT. Kidney diseases result in marked elevations in Lp(a) levels, albeit dependent on disease stages, dialysis modalities and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes. In contrast, Lp(a) levels are reduced in liver diseases in parallel with the disease progression, although population studies have yielded conflicting results on the associations between Lp(a) levels and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Overall, current evidence supports a role for diet, hormones and related conditions, and liver and kidney diseases in modifying Lp(a) levels.

Patients with Thyroid Disorder, a Contraindication for Dental Implants? A Systematic Review

The thyroid gland is composed of the thyroid follicles, considered to be the functional units of the thyroid gland. The synthesis of the thyroid hormones occurs in these follicles. Triiodothyronine (T3) and thyroxine (T4) are the thyroid hormones and affect metabolic processes all through the body. This systematic evaluation was performed to answer the following PICO question: “Can patients with thyroid disorders undergo dental implant rehabilitation with the same survival rate as patients without thyroid disorders?”. A systematic review of the literature was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements to gather available and current evidence of thyroid disorders and its relationship with dental implants. The electronic search, in the PubMed and Cochrane databases, yielded 22 articles. Out of the 22 articles, only 11 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Manual research of the reference list yielded no additional papers. According to the SORT criteria and answering our PICO question, level B can be established to conclude that patients with thyroid disorders can be rehabilitated with dental implants, with similar survival rates as patients without thyroid disorders. Papers with higher scientific evidence and bigger sample size should be carried out.

A Real-World Study of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone in the Treatment of Idiopathic Short Stature and Growth Hormone Deficiency

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) in the treatment of children with idiopathic short stature (ISS) and growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and to explore the related factors affecting treatment efficacy.

Methods

The current research reflects a real-world study. A total of 79 patients with ISS and 95 patients with GHD (both groups pre-puberty) who had been treated with rhGH for more than one year from January 2010 to September 2019 were included in this study. The patients were divided into two groups, ie, an ISS and a GHD group, respectively. The growth indexes, such as chronological age (CA), bone age (BA), height standard deviation score (HtSDS), insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) SDS, and body mass index were recorded and compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The treatment efficacy was evaluated according to changes in HtSDS before and after treatment, and the influencing factors of clinical efficacy were analyzed using a multivariate regression model.

Results

At the start of treatment, the differences in CA, BA, height, weight, sexual development stage, HtSDS, mid-parental height SDS, and IGF-1 SDS between the two groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, the initial dose of rhGH in the GHD group was significantly lower than in the ISS group (P < 0.001). Following rhGH treatment, the differences in CA, BA, BA/CA ratio, and IGF-1 SDS measured at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months between the ISS and GHD groups were not statistically significant, while the difference in HtSDS measured at 6 months was statistically significant. With the extension of rhGH treatment time, the annual growth rate (GV) gradually decreased, and the difference between HtSDS and the baseline gradually increased; however, the differences between the ISS and GHD groups were not statistically significant. The most important factor affecting the treatment efficacy for patients with ISS was age at the start of treatment; the most important factors affecting the treatment efficacy for patients with GHD were age and IGF-1 SDS.

Conclusion

Recombinant human growth hormone treatment can significantly improve the height of patients with ISS and GHD. There was no significant difference in growth rate between patients with ISS and those with GHD at relatively high doses. The common factor affecting the treatment efficacy of the two groups was the age at the start of treatment. During treatment, monitored data indicated that rhGH treatment of GHD and ISS thyroid function showed a clinical phenomenon in the form of increased free triiodothyronine, rather than hypothyroidism, which was rarely reported in existing studies.

Decreased Thyroxine Levels during rhGH Therapy in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency

Background: Hypothyroidism in children leads to growth retardation. However, there is some evidence that recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy could suppress thyroid function. The most common observation in rhGH-treated patients is a decrease in thyroxine levels, which is reported as transient, but the studies in the field are inconsistent. We aimed to evaluate thyroid function in initially euthyroid children with idiopathic isolated GH deficiency during long-term rhGH therapy and to determine who is at a higher risk of thyroid function alterations during the therapy. Methods: The study group consisted of 101 children treated with rhGH for at least three years. Serum TSH and fT4 levels were determined at baseline, after the first six months and after each full year of therapy. The associations between changes in thyroid hormone levels during rhGH therapy and GH deficit, insulin-like growth factor-1 levels and growth response were investigated. Results: A significant decrease in fT4 levels (p = 0.01) was found as early as after the first six months of rhGH therapy. This effect persisted in the subsequent years of treatment without any significant changes in TSH values and tended to be rhGH dose related. Children with a greater fT4 decrease after the initiation of rhGH therapy were older, had higher bone age and responded to that therapy worse than children with lower fT4 changes. Conclusions: Our study revealed a long-term decrease in fT4 levels during rhGH therapy in initially euthyroid GHD children. The decrease in fT4 levels was associated with a lower growth response to rhGH therapy.