CA11-19: a tumor marker for the detection of colorectal cancer

Where do we stand with screening for colorectal cancer and advanced adenoma based on serum protein biomarkers? A systematic review

Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening has been proven to reduce both mortality and the incidence of this disease. Most CRC screening programs are based on fecal immunochemical tests (FITs), which have a low participation rate. Searching for blood protein biomarkers can lead to the development of a more accepted screening test. The aim of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic potential of the most promising serum protein biomarkers. A systematic review based on PRISMA guidelines was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases between January 2010 and December 2023. Studies assessing blood protein biomarkers for CRC screening were included. The sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve of each biomarker were collected. Among 4685 screened studies, 94 were considered for analysis. Most of them were case-control studies, leading to an overestimation of the performance of candidate biomarkers. The performance of no protein biomarker or combination of biomarkers appears to match that of the FIT. Studies with a suitable design and population, testing new assay techniques, or based on algorithms combining FIT with serum tests are needed.

Colorectal cancer screening: A review of current knowledge and progress in research

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide, being the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Despite the progress in screening, early diagnosis, and treatment, approximately 20%-25% of CRC patients still present with metastatic disease at the time of their initial diagnosis. Furthermore, the burden of disease is still expected to increase, especially in individuals younger than 50 years old, among whom early-onset CRC incidence has been increasing. Screening and early detection are pivotal to improve CRC-related outcomes. It is well established that CRC screening not only reduces incidence, but also decreases deaths from CRC. Diverse screening strategies have proven effective in decreasing both CRC incidence and mortality, though variations in efficacy have been reported across the literature. However, uncertainties persist regarding the optimal screening method, age intervals and periodicity. Moreover, adherence to CRC screening remains globally low. In recent years, emerging technologies, notably artificial intelligence, and non-invasive biomarkers, have been developed to overcome these barriers. However, controversy exists over the actual impact of some of the new discoveries on CRC-related outcomes and how to effectively integrate them into daily practice. In this review, we aim to cover the current evidence surrounding CRC screening. We will further critically assess novel approaches under investigation, in an effort to differentiate promising innovations from mere novelties.

Current advances in detecting genetic and epigenetic biomarkers of colorectal cancer

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is the third most common cancer in terms of diagnosis and the second in terms of mortality. Recent studies have shown that various proteins, extracellular vesicles (i.e., exosomes), specific genetic variants, gene transcripts, cell-free DNA (cfDNA), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and altered epigenetic patterns, can be used to detect, and assess the prognosis of CRC. Over the last decade, a plethora of conventional methodologies (e.g., polymerase chain reaction [PCR], direct sequencing, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA], microarray, in situ hybridization) as well as advanced analytical methodologies (e.g., microfluidics, electrochemical biosensors, surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy [SERS]) have been developed for analyzing genetic and epigenetic biomarkers using both optical and non-optical tools. Despite these methodologies, no gold standard detection method has yet been implemented that can analyze CRC with high specificity and sensitivity in an inexpensive, simple, and time-efficient manner. Moreover, until now, no study has critically reviewed the advantages and limitations of these methodologies. Here, an overview of the most used genetic and epigenetic biomarkers for CRC and their detection methods are discussed. Furthermore, a summary of the major biological, technical, and clinical challenges and advantages/limitations of existing techniques is also presented.

A Label-Free Electrochemical Immunosensor for CEA Detection on a Novel Signal Amplification Platform of Cu2S/Pd/CuO Nanocomposites

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is regarded as one of the crucial tumor markers for colorectal cancer. In this study, we developed the snowflake Cu₂S/Pd/CuO nanocomposite to construct an original label-free electrochemical immunosensor for the ultrasensitive detection of CEA levels. The nanocomposite of cuprous sulfide (Cu₂S) with Pd nanoparticles (Pd NPs) was synthesized through an in situ formation of Pd NPs on the Cu₂S. Cuprous sulfide (Cu₂S) and CuO can not only be used as a carrier to increase the reaction area but also catalyze the substrate to generate current signal. Palladium nanoparticles (Pd NPs) have excellent catalytic properties and good biocompatibility, as well as the ability of excellent electron transfer. The immunosensor was designed using 5 mmol/L H₂O₂ as the active substrate by optimizing the conditions with a detection range from 100 fg/ml to 100 ng/ml and a minimum detection limit of 33.11 fg/ml. The human serum was detected by electrochemical immunoassay, and the results were consistent with those of the commercial electrochemical immunosensor. Therefore, the electrochemical immunosensor can be used for the detection of human serum samples and have potential value for clinical application.

Serum angiogenin as a potential biomarker for early detection of colorectal adenomas and colorectal cancer

Although colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common causes of cancer mortality, early-stage detection dramatically improves survival rate. To explore the feasibility of serum angiogenin (ANG) as a biomarker for early detection of colorectal neoplasia, we collected serum samples from 781 participants, including 369 patients with CRC, 133 with colorectal adenoma and 279 healthy controls. We examined the levels of serum ANG by ELISA, calculated the diagnostic accuracy of ANG by plotted receiver operating characteristic curves (ROCs), and compared it with those obtained by carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9). We also analyzed the relationship between serum ANG level and TNM stage in CRC patients. The results showed that ANG serum levels were significantly elevated in patients with colorectal adenomas and CRC (P < 0.01). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for ANG in distinguishing CRC patients from healthy controls was 0.740 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.705-0.744], comparable to that of CEA (0.770; 95% CI: 0.735-0.802; P = 0.26) but significantly higher than that of CA19-9 (0.636; 95% CI: 0.598-0.674, P < 0.01), with much higher sensitivity (67.75%) than CEA (36.86%) or CA19-9 (12.20%). We observed no significant differences in ANG serum levels among CRCs at different TNM stages. Furthermore, sensitivity and specificity of ANG for distinguishing colorectal adenomas patients from healthy controls were 66.20% and 64.90%, respectively. ANG has the potential to serve as a serum biomarker for early detection of colorectal neoplasia.

Plasma Inter-Alpha-Trypsin Inhibitor Heavy Chains H3 and H4 Serve as Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Human Colorectal Cancer

Objective

Inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H3 (ITIH₃) and inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H4 (ITIH₄) are heavy chains of protein members belonging to the ITI family, which was associated with inflammation and carcinogenesis. However, the diagnostic value of ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ in human colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown.

Methods

In total, 101 CRC patients and 156 healthy controls were enrolled. The concentrations of ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ proteins in plasma samples of participants were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ expressions in human CRC tissues were additionally assessed via immunohistochemical staining (IHC). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was applied to estimate the diagnostic power of the two proteins, and the net reclassification improvement (NRI) was adopted to evaluate the incremental predictive ability of ITIH₃/ITIH₄ when added to the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1).

Results

The plasma concentration of ITIH₃ in CRC patients (median: 4.370 μg/mL; range: 2.152–8.170 μg/mL) was significantly lower than that in healthy subjects (median: 4.715 μg/mL; range: 2.665–10.257 μg/mL; p < 0.001), while the ITIH₄ plasma level in subjects with CRC (median: 0.211 μg/mL; range: 0.099–0.592 μg/mL) was markedly increased relative to that in the control group (median: 0.134 μg/mL; range: 0.094–0.460 μg/mL, p < 0.001). Consistently, IHC score assessment showed a dramatic reduction in ITIH₃ expression and, conversely, upregulation of ITIH₄ in colorectal carcinoma specimens relative to adjacent normal colorectal tissues (p < 0.001 in both cases). The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC for ITIH₄ (AUC = 0.801, 95% CI: 0.745–0.857) was higher than that for ITIH₃ (AUC = 0.638, 95% CI: 0.571–0.704, both p values < 0.001). The AUC of the ROC for combined ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ was even higher than that for carcinoembryonic antigen. NRI results showed that combining ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ with TIMP-1 significantly improved diagnostic accuracy (NRI = 17.12%, p = 0.002) for CRC patients compared to TIMP-1 alone.

Conclusions

Circulating ITIH₃ and ITIH₄ levels are associated with carcinogenesis in CRC, supporting their potential diagnostic utility as surrogate biomarkers for colorectal cancer detection.

Combination of serum lipids and cancer antigens as a novel marker for colon cancer diagnosis

Background

Colon cancer is a malignancy of the large intestine with high mortality and economic burden. Recent studies reveal a new relationship between blood lipids and the risk of cancer. The presents study aims to investigate the combination of serum lipids with cancer antigens as a novel diagnostic marker for colon cancer.

Methods

Two hundred of colon cancer patients or healthy subjects were recruited. Serum lipids and cancer antigens such as total cholesterol (TC), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA19–9) were measured.

Results

There were significantly lower level of serum TC or HDL, and significantly higher level of serum CEA or CA19–9 in patients than in healthy subjects. Serum TC or HDL in patients with advanced colon cancer was significantly lower than the ones with early stage disease. The level of serum TC or HDL in patients after surgical removal of colon cancer was significantly higher compared to the ones before surgery, but serum CEA or CA19–9 after surgery was significantly reduced in comparison with the ones before surgery. Combined TC, HDL, CEA and CA19–9 as a diagnostic marker for colon cancer had the highest positive predictive rate in comparison with individual, two or three of the parameters.

Conclusions

The combination of serum TC, HDL, CEA and CA19–9 can be used as an effective marker for colon cancer, and offers a novel strategy for clinical diagnosis and monitoring the disease.

Systematic review of blood diagnostic markers in colorectal cancer

The purpose of this systematic review was to compare the diagnostic ability of blood markers for colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic review of the literature for diagnostic blood markers for primary human colorectal cancer over the last 5 years was performed. The primary outcome was to assess the diagnostic ability of these markers in diagnosing colorectal cancer. The secondary outcome was to see whether the marker was compared to other markers. The tertiary outcome was to assess diagnostic ability in early versus late CRC, including stage IV disease. We identified 51 studies (29 prospective, 14 retrospective, and 8 meta-analyses). The markers were divided in broadly four groups: nucleic acids (RNA/DNA/messenger RNA/microRNAs), cytokines, antibodies, and proteins. The most promising circulating markers identified among the nucleid acids were NEAT_v2 non-coding RNA, SDC2 methylated DNA, and SEPT9 methylated DNA. The most promising cytokine to detect CRC was interleukin 8, and the most promising circulating proteins were CA11-19 glycoprotein and DC-SIGN/DC-SIGNR. Sensitivities of these markers for detecting primary colorectal carcinoma ranged from 70 to 98% and specificities from 84 to 98.7%. The best studied blood marker was SEPT9 methylated DNA, which showed great variability with sensitivities ranging from 48.2 to 95.6% and specificities from 80 to 98.9%, making its clinical applicability challenging. If combined with fecal immunochemical test (FIT), the sensitivity improved from 78 to 94% in detecting CRC. Methylated SEPT9, methylated SDC2, and -SIGN/DC-SIGNR protein had better sensitivity and specificity than CEA or CA 19-9. With the exception of SEPT9 which is currently being implemented as a screening test for CRC all other markers lacked reproducibility and standardization and were studied in relatively small population samples.

A Highly Predictive Model for Diagnosis of Colorectal Neoplasms Using Plasma MicroRNA: Improving Specificity and Sensitivity

OBJECTIVE

To develop a plasma-based microRNA (miRNA) diagnostic assay specific for colorectal neoplasms, building upon our prior work.

BACKGROUND

Colorectal neoplasms [colorectal cancer (CRC) and colorectal advanced adenoma (CAA)] frequently develop in individuals at ages when other common cancers also occur. Current screening methods lack sensitivity, specificity, and have poor patient compliance.

METHODS

Plasma was screened for 380 miRNAs using microfluidic array technology from a "Training" cohort of 60 patients, (10 each) control, CRC, CAA, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, and lung cancer. We identified uniquely dysregulated miRNAs specific for colorectal neoplasia (P < 0.05, false discovery rate: 5%, adjusted α = 0.0038). These miRNAs were evaluated using single assays in a "Test" cohort of 120 patients. A mathematical model was developed to predict blinded sample identity in a 150 patient "Validation" cohort using repeat-sub-sampling validation of the testing dataset with 1000 iterations each to assess model detection accuracy.

RESULTS

Seven miRNAs (miR-21, miR-29c, miR-122, miR-192, miR-346, miR-372, and miR-374a) were selected based upon P value, area under the curve (AUC), fold change, and biological plausibility. Area under the curve (±95% confidence interval) for "Test" cohort comparisons were 0.91 (0.85-0.96) between all neoplasia and controls, 0.79 (0.70-0.88) between colorectal neoplasia and other cancers, and 0.98 (0.96-1.0) between CRC and colorectal adenomas. In our "Validation" cohort, our mathematical model predicted blinded sample identity with 69% to 77% accuracy, 67% to 76% accuracy, and 86% to 90% accuracy for each comparison, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our plasma miRNA assay and prediction model differentiate colorectal neoplasia from patients with other neoplasms and from controls with higher sensitivity and specificity compared with current clinical standards.