1
|
Qatomah A, Aihara H. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in the USA: The current state and future perspectives. DEN OPEN 2025; 5:e394. [PMID: 38915785 PMCID: PMC11194299 DOI: 10.1002/deo2.394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 05/16/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a transformative advancement in the endoscopic management of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. Initially conceived for the treatment of early gastric cancer, ESD has demonstrated proficiency in achieving en-bloc resection of superficial gastrointestinal lesions. ESD has experienced widespread acceptance in Japan and East Asia; however, its adoption in the USA remains delayed. This initial hesitancy could be attributed to procedural complexity and training demands; nonetheless, recently, ESD has been gaining popularity in the USA. This is due to the advancements in endoscopic technology, tailored training programs, and cumulative evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ESDs. This review aimed to deliberate the historical progress, current implementation, and prospective trajectory of ESDs in the USA. With ongoing clinical research, technological integration, and educational efforts, ESD is likely to become the gold standard for managing large gastrointesitinal lesions. This progress marks an imperative step toward less invasive, more precise, and patient-centric approaches regarding advanced therapeutic endoscopy in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulrahman Qatomah
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyMcGill University Health CenterMontrealCanada
- Division of Gastroenterology and HepatologyKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research CenterJeddahSaudi Arabia
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and EndoscopyBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolBostonMassachusettsUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wani S, Cote GA, Keswani RN, Yadlapati RH, Hall M, O'Hara J, Berzin TM, Burbridge RA, Chahal P, Cohen J, Coyle WJ, Early D, Guda NM, Inamdar S, Khanna L, Kulkarni A, Rosenkranz L, Sharma N, Shin EJ, Siddiqui UD, Sinha J, Vanderveldt H, Draganov PV. Development of American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy standards for training in advanced endoscopy within dedicated advanced endoscopy fellowship programs. Gastrointest Endosc 2024:S0016-5107(24)00186-X. [PMID: 38935016 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.03.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Training in interventional endoscopy is offered by nonaccredited advanced endoscopy fellowship programs (AEFPs). The number of these programs has increased dramatically with a concurrent increase in the breadth and complexity of interventional endoscopy procedures. Accreditation is governed by competency-based education, yet what constitutes a "high-quality" nonaccredited AEFP has not been defined. Using an evidence-based consensus process, we aimed to establish standards for AEFPs. METHODS The RAND UCLA appropriateness method, a well-described modified Delphi process to develop quality indicators, was used. A task force established by the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy drafted potential quality indicators (structure, process, and outcome) in 6 categories: activity preceding training; structure of AEFPs; training in ERCP, EUS, and EMR; and luminal stent placement. Three rounds of iterative feedback from 20 experts were conducted. Round 0 involved discussion of project details. In round 1, experts independently ranked proposed quality indicators on a 9-point interval scale ranging from highly inappropriate (1) to highly appropriate (9). Next, proposed quality indicators were discussed and reworded in a group meeting followed by round 2, in which experts independently reranked proposed quality indicators and provided benchmarks (when applicable). The median score for each quality indicator was calculated. Mean absolute deviation from the median was calculated, and appropriateness of potential quality indicators was assessed using the BIOMED concerted action on appropriateness definition, P value method, and interpercentile range adjusted for symmetry definition. A quality indicator was deemed appropriate if the median score was ≥7 and met criteria for appropriateness using all 3 defined statistical methods. RESULTS Of 89 proposed quality indicators, 37 statements met criteria as appropriate for a quality indicator (activity preceding training, 2; structure of AEFPs, 10; training in ERCP, 7; training in EUS, 8; training in EMR, 7; luminal stent placement, 3). Minimum thresholds were defined for 19 relevant quality indicators for number of trainers, procedures during fellowship, and procedures before assessment of competence. Among the final appropriate quality indicators were that all trainees should undergo qualitative and quantitative competence assessments using validated tools at least quarterly with documented feedback throughout the training period and that trainees should track outcomes and relevant quality metrics for specific procedures. CONCLUSIONS This consensus process using validated methodology established standards for an AEFP in an effort to ensure adequate training in the most commonly taught interventional endoscopic procedures (ERCP, EUS, EMR, and luminal stent placement) during fellowship. An important component of an AEFP is the use of competency-based assessments that are compliant with the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's Next Accreditation System, with the goal of ensuring that trainees achieve specific milestones in their progression to achieving cognitive and technical competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Wani
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Gregory A Cote
- Division of Gastroenterology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Rajesh N Keswani
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Rena H Yadlapati
- UCSD Center for Esophageal Diseases, Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Matt Hall
- Children's Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas, USA
| | - Jack O'Hara
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tyler M Berzin
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rebecca A Burbridge
- Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Prabhleen Chahal
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Jonathan Cohen
- New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Walter J Coyle
- Division of Gastroenterology, Scripps Green Hospital, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Dayna Early
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Nalini M Guda
- Aurora St Luke's Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Sumant Inamdar
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Lauren Khanna
- Department of Medicine, New York University Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Abhijit Kulkarni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Laura Rosenkranz
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, University of Texas Health, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Neil Sharma
- Division of Interventional Endoscopic Oncology and Surgical Endoscopy, Parkview Health, Fort Wayne, Indiana, USA
| | - Eun Ji Shin
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Uzma D Siddiqui
- Center for Endoscopic Research and Therapeutics (CERT), University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA; 20Division of Gastroenterology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Jasmine Sinha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Hendrikus Vanderveldt
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aihara H, Draganov PV. Does a Rising Tide Lift All Boats? How Institutional Procedural Volume Impacts the Clinical Outcomes of Gastric Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:561-563. [PMID: 38311124 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hadjinicolaou AV, Pappas A, Sujendran V, Kakhandki V, Abe S, di Pietro M. Untutored training pathway to achieve competence in esophagogastric endoscopic submucosal dissection in a Western center. Gastrointest Endosc 2024; 99:439-443.e6. [PMID: 37898221 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.10.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Revised: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has a long learning curve. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of an ESD unsupervised training model for experienced endoscopists. METHODS Stepwise training included a visit to a high-volume center, unsupervised training on an ex vivo porcine model, and in vivo human upper GI cases with anatomic progression. Performance measures included en bloc resection, R0 resection, adverse event rates, and operating time. RESULTS After observation of 30 esophagogastric ESDs and 15 untutored ex vivo ESDs, 5 human cases of distal gastric ESDs were performed, followed by 55 unselected esophagogastric cases. En bloc and R0 resection rates were 93.0% and 80.7%, respectively. Operating time was 14.0 min/cm2 in the stomach and 25.1 min/cm2 in the esophagus, with evidence of a learning curve for esophageal ESDs (first block 30.26 min/cm2 vs second block 14.81 min/cm2, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Untutored training for esophagogastric ESD is feasible and allows endoscopists, experienced in therapeutic endoscopy, to achieve the required standards toward competency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas V Hadjinicolaou
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Apostolos Pappas
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Department of Gastroenterology, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vijay Sujendran
- Cambridge Oesophago-Gastric Center, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Vibhay Kakhandki
- Department of Anaesthesia, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Seiichiro Abe
- Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Massimiliano di Pietro
- Early Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Steinbrück I, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL, Oyama T, Pohl J, von Hahn T, Schmidt A, Allgaier HP. Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Unsupervised Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection During the Initial Learning Curve with Prevalence-Based Indication. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3614-3624. [PMID: 37421512 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08026-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For an adequate educational strategy of ESD in non-Asian settings with prevalence-based indication it is essential to define adequate lesions, suitable for the beginner without on-site expert-supervision. AIMS We analyzed possible predictors for outcome parameters of effectiveness and safety during the initial learning curve. METHODS The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480), performed between 2007 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals, were enrolled. Uni-/multivariable regression analysis was done with sex, age, pretreated lesion, lesion size, organ, and organ-based localization as possible independent predictors for en bloc resection (EBR), complication, and resection speed. RESULTS Rates of EBR, complication, and resection speed were 84.5%, 14.2%, and 6.20 (± 4.45) cm2/h. Independent predictors for EBR were pretreated lesion (OR 0.27 [0.13-0.57], p < 0.001) and non-colonic ESD (OR 2.29 [1.26-4.17] (rectum)/5.72 [2.36-13.89] (stomach)/7.80 [2.60-23.42] (esophagus), p < 0.001), for complication pretreated lesion (OR 3.04 [1.46-6.34], p < 0.001) and lesion size (OR 1.02 [1.004-1.04], p = 0.012) and for resection speed pretreated lesion (RC - 3.10 [- 4.39 to - 1.81], p < 0.001), lesion size (RC 0.13 [0.11-0.16], p < 0.001) and male patient (RC - 1.11 [- 1.85 to - 0.37], p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the incidence of technically unsuccessful resections in esophageal (1/84), gastric (3/113), rectal (7/181), and colonic (3/101) ESDs (p = 0.76). Technical failure was mainly caused by complication and fibrosis/pretreatment. CONCLUSION During the initial learning curve of an unsupervised ESD program with prevalence-based indication, pretreated lesions and colonic ESDs should be avoided. In contrast, lesion size and organ-based localizations have less predictive value for the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Berlin, Fanningerstraße 32, 10365, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic teaching Hospital of University of Bonn, Prinz-Albert-Straße 40, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, Saku, Nagano, 3850051, Japan
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Visrodia K, Dobashi A, Bazerbachi F, Poneros J, Sethi A. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Facilitating Techniques Among Non-experts: A Systematic Literature Review. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:2561-2584. [PMID: 37024739 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-022-07784-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2022] [Accepted: 11/30/2022] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The dissemination of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been limited by its technical complexity and safety profile, particularly among non-experts. Various techniques and devices have facilitated the performance of ESD, but their yield and role in the path to learning ESD remain unclear. METHODS We performed a systematic review by querying MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Japan Medical Abstracts Society specifically for comparative studies investigating the impact of assigned ESD techniques vs. conventional techniques among non-experts in ESD (< 50 ESD procedures). Procedural outcomes of efficacy, efficiency, and safety were assessed. RESULTS We identified 46 studies evaluating 54 cohorts in which a total 237 non-experts performed 2461 ESDs conventionally, and 1953 ESDs using an assigned ESD technique (knives, countertraction, miscellaneous techniques). The majority of studies were from East Asia (67%), single-center (96%), observational in design (61%), in an animal model (57%), and gastric location (63%). The most studied techniques were countertraction techniques (48% cohorts) and scissor knives (15% cohorts), both of which commonly enhanced efficiency of ESD, and less so efficacy or safety. Techniques found to be beneficial in experts were more likely to be beneficial in non-experts (70% concordance) than vice versa (47% concordance). CONCLUSION Based on the currently available literature, countertraction techniques and scissor knives should be considered for early incorporation into ESD training by non-experts. Several aspects of ESD training remain understudied, including techniques in Western non-experts, educational resources, and several commonly cited techniques. These areas should guide future investigation to enhance the pathway to learning ESD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavel Visrodia
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Fort Washington Ave, 8th Fl, Ste 852A, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
| | - Akira Dobashi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Fateh Bazerbachi
- CentraCare, Interventional Endoscopy Program, St Cloud Hospital, St Cloud, MN, USA
| | - John Poneros
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Fort Washington Ave, 8th Fl, Ste 852A, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| | - Amrita Sethi
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Irving Medical Center-New York Presbyterian Hospital, 161 Fort Washington Ave, 8th Fl, Ste 852A, New York, NY, 10032, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Li S, Mosko J, May G, Teshima C. A Nationwide Survey of Training Pathways and Practice Trends of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Canada. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol 2023; 6:80-85. [PMID: 37025511 PMCID: PMC10071294 DOI: 10.1093/jcag/gwac037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become an established standard for endoscopic removal of large gastrointestinal (GI) lesions and early GI malignancies. However, ESD is technically challenging and requires significant health care infrastructure. As such, its adoption in Canada has been relatively slow. The practice of ESD across Canada remains unclear. Our study aimed to provide a descriptive overview of training pathways and practice trends of ESD in Canada.
Methods
Current ESD practitioners across Canada were identified and invited to participate in an anonymous cross-sectional survey.
Results
Twenty-seven ESD practitioners were identified; survey response rate was 74%. Respondents were from 15 different institutions. All practitioners underwent international ESD training of some type. Fifty per cent pursued long-term ESD training programs. Ninety-five per cent attended short-term training courses. Sixty per cent and 40% performed hands-on live human upper and lower GI ESD, respectively, before independent practice. In practice, 70% saw an increase per year in number of procedures performed from 2015 to 2019. Sixty per cent were dissatisfied with their institution’s health care infrastructure to support ESD. Thirty-five per cent perceived their institution as supportive of expanding the practice of ESD.
Conclusions
Several challenges exist to the adoption of ESD in Canada. Training pathways are variable, with no set standards. In practice, practitioners express dissatisfaction with access to necessary infrastructure and feel poorly supported in expanding the practice of ESD. As ESD is increasingly the accepted standard for the treatment of many neoplastic GI lesions, greater collaboration between practitioners and institutions is crucial to standardize training and ensure patient access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suqing Li
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary , Calgary, Alberta , Canada
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Jeffrey Mosko
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Gary May
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| | - Christopher Teshima
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, The Center for Advanced Therapeutic Endoscopy and Endoscopic Oncology, St. Michael’s Hospital , Toronto, Ontario , Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang D, Hasan MK, Draganov PV. East versus West: Comparisons and Implications in Adaptation to Practice. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:7-13. [PMID: 36375888 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the preferred strategy for the resection of large superficial neoplasia throughout the gastrointestinal tract in Asian countries. The transition of ESD to the West has been slower because of various regional and training differences. Nonetheless, over the past couple of decades, the steady growth of ESD mentors in the West and the introduction of viable training pathways and dedicated devices and accessories have led to the increasing adoption of ESD and other third space endoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Yang
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Peter V Draganov
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Florida, 1329 SW 16(th) Street, Room #5262, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simsek C, Aihara H. Training in Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in the United States: The Current Paradigm. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2023; 33:41-53. [PMID: 36375885 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2022.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) training in Japan is pursued through a designated master-apprentice, organ-based stepwise training model. However, applying a similar program to the United States is not a practical strategy due to the significant differences in the training system and disease prevalence. To incorporate the ESD training into the current advanced endoscopy fellowship program, the use of recently developed techniques and technologies to improve the efficiency of ESD is ideal. The ESD training program in the United States should be prevalence-based, with increased involvement of trainees depending on their objectively assessed competency levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cem Simsek
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hiroyuki Aihara
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bustamante-Balén M. How to avoid overtreatment of benign colorectal lesions: Rationale for an evidence-based management. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:6619-6631. [PMID: 36620344 PMCID: PMC9813935 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i47.6619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Implementing population-based screening programs for colorectal cancer has led to an increase in the detection of large but benign histological lesions. Currently, endoscopic mucosal resection can be considered the standard technique for the removal of benign lesions of the colon due to its excellent safety profile and good clinical results. However, several studies from different geographic areas agree that many benign colon lesions are still referred for surgery. Moreover, the referral rate to surgery is not decreasing over the years, despite the theoretical improvement of endoscopic resection techniques. This article will review the leading causes for benign colorectal lesions to be referred for surgery and the influence of the endoscopist experience on the referral rate. It will also describe how to categorize a polyp as complex for resection and consider an endoscopist as an expert in endoscopic resection. And finally, we will propose a framework for the accurate and evidence-based treatment of complex benign colorectal lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Research Group, Hospital Universitari I Politècnic La Fe, Health Research Institute Hospital La Fe (IISLaFe), Valencia 46026, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Cho JH, Jin SY, Park S. Resection speed of endoscopic submucosal dissection according to the location of gastric neoplasia: a learning curve using cumulative sum analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2969-2979. [PMID: 36512121 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09821-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is few study evaluating the relationship between endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) resection speed and the lesion characteristics of gastric neoplasia. We investigated the learning curve of consecutive ESDs using cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. METHODS A total of 356 ESDs performed by a single endoscopist were grouped chronologically into three learning periods. The ESD procedure was defined to be fast when resection speed was > 9.0 cm2/hour. The CUSUM method was used to assess the number of ESDs required for achieving proficiency and mastery. RESULTS Mean resection speed was significantly faster in Phase III (15.1 cm2/hour) compared to those in Phase I (9.3 cm2/hour) and II (11.4 cm2/hour) (p < 0.001). Tumors in the stomach's upper and middle third location were significantly associated with difficulty in attaining the fast resection speed (odds ratios, 0.05 and 0.36) compared to the lower third location. The number of ESDs required to achieve a competency for fast resection was 15 for tumors in the lower third of the stomach and 98 for those in the upper/middle third location, respectively. In the lower third location of the tumor, the CUSUM curve revealed that 75 cases were needed to achieve proficiency and 174 cases to achieve mastery. However, mastery was not achieved in ESD for the upper/middle third tumor during the study period. CONCLUSION The time required to achieve relevant competency in gastric ESD depends on the tumor location.
Collapse
|
12
|
GIE Editorial Board Top 10: advances in GI endoscopy in 2021. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 96:1062-1070. [PMID: 35948180 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The 9-member Editorial Board of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy performed a systematic literature search of original articles published during 2021 in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy and 10 other high-impact medical and gastroenterology journals on endoscopy-related topics. Votes from each editorial board member were tallied to identify a consensus list of the 10 most significant topic areas in GI endoscopy over the calendar year of study, with a focus on 3 criteria: significance, novelty, and global impact on clinical practice. The 10 areas identified collectively represent advances in the following endoscopic topics: colonoscopy optimization, bariatric endoscopy, endoscopic needle sampling and drainage, peroral endoscopic myotomy, endoscopic defect closure, meeting systemic challenges in endoscopic training and practice, endohepatology, FNA versus fine-needle biopsy sampling, endoscopic mucosal and submucosal procedures, and cold snare polypectomy. Each board member contributed a summary of important articles relevant to 1 to 2 of the consensus topic areas, leading to a collective summary that is presented in this document of the "top 10" endoscopic advances of 2021.
Collapse
|
13
|
Thaker AM, Phan J, Ge PS, Muthusamy VR. Driving Quality in Advanced Endoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 20:2675-2679.e2. [PMID: 35931350 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Adarsh M Thaker
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer Phan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Keck Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Phillip S Ge
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - V Raman Muthusamy
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Learning curve of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with prevalence-based indication in unsupervised Western settings: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2574-2586. [PMID: 36344898 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09742-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS As there is still no consensus about the adequate training strategy for ESD in Western countries, we evaluated unsupervised prevalence-based learning curves including detailed organ-specific subgroup analysis. METHODS The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480) were divided into three groups (1: ESD 1-40, 2: ESD 41-80, 3: ESD 81-120). Outcome parameters were rates of technical success, en bloc and R0 resection, the resection speed, rates of conversion to EMR, curative resection, adverse events, surgery due to adverse events, and recurrence. In addition, we analyzed the achievement of quality benchmarks indicating levels of expertise. RESULTS After exclusion of pretreated lesions, 438 procedures were enrolled in the final analysis. Technical success rates were > 96% with significant improvements regarding rate of en bloc resection (from 82.6 to 91.2%), resection speed (from 4.54 to 7.63 cm2/h), and rate of conversion to EMR (from 22.0 to 8.1%). No significant differences could be observed for rates of R0 resection (65.9 vs. 69.6%), curative resection (55.8 vs. 55.7%), adverse events (16.3 vs. 11.7%), surgery due to adverse events (1.5 vs. 1.3%), and recurrence (12.5 vs. 4.5%). Subgroup and benchmark analysis revealed an improvement in esophageal, gastric, and rectal ESD with achievement of competence levels for the esophagus and stomach within 80 and most of the benchmarks for proficiency level within 120 procedures. Some of the benchmarks could also be achieved in rectal ESD. CONCLUSIONS This trial confirms safety and feasibility of unsupervised ESD along the initial learning curve with prevalence-based indication and exclusion of colonic cases.
Collapse
|
15
|
Hayat M, Azeem N, Bilal M. Colon Polypectomy with Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection and Endoscopic Full-Thickness Resection. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2022; 32:277-298. [PMID: 35361336 DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2021.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Endoscopic resection has become the gold standard for the management of most of the large colorectal polyps. Various endoscopic resection techniques include endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR). ESD is a minimally invasive method for the resection of advanced lesions in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract to achieve en-bloc resection. While, EFTR is more commonly used in lesions with suspected deeper submucosal invasion, lesions originating from muscularis propria, or those with advanced fibrosis. This article reviews the indications, technique, and adverse events for use of ESD and EFTR in the colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maham Hayat
- Section of Digestive Diseases and Nutrition, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, 800 Stanton L Young Boulevard, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| | - Nabeel Azeem
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Mohammad Bilal
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; Advanced Endoscopy, Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1 Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Advanced Endoscopy Training in the United States: An Advanced Fellow's Perspective. ACG Case Rep J 2021; 8:e00612. [PMID: 34095330 PMCID: PMC8174546 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
|