1
|
Xu M, Yang JY, Meng T. Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:2270-2280. [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2024] [Revised: 05/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignant tumors, and early screening is crucial to improving the survival rate of patients. The combination of colonoscopy and immune fecal occult blood detection has garnered significant attention as a novel method for CRC screening. Colonoscopy and fecal occult blood tests, when combined, can improve screening accuracy and early detection rates, thereby facilitating early intervention and treatment. However, certain risks and costs accompany it, making the establishment of a risk classification model crucial for accurate classification and management of screened subjects.
AIM To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood test (FIT), and risk-graded screening strategies in CRC screening.
METHODS Based on the randomized controlled trial of CRC screening in the population conducted by our hospital May 2020 to May 2023, participants who met the requirements were randomly assigned to a colonoscopy group, an FIT group, or a graded screening group at a ratio of 1:2:2 (after risk assessment, the high-risk group received colonoscopy, the low-risk group received an FIT test, and the FIT-positive group received colonoscopy). The three groups received CRC screening with different protocols, among which the colonoscopy group only received baseline screening, and the FIT group and the graded screening group received annual follow-up screening based on baseline screening. The primary outcome was the detection rate of advanced tumors, including CRC and advanced adenoma. The population participation rate, advanced tumor detection rate, and colonoscopy load of the three screening programs were compared.
RESULTS A total of 19373 subjects who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were enrolled, including 8082 males (41.7%) and 11291 females (58.3%). The mean age was 60.05 ± 6.5 years. Among them, 3883 patients were enrolled in the colonoscopy group, 7793 in the FIT group, and 7697 in the graded screening group. Two rounds of follow-up screening were completed in the FIT group and the graded screening group. The graded screening group (89.2%) and the colonoscopy group (42.3%) had the lowest overall screening participation rates, while the FIT group had the highest (99.3%). The results of the intentional analysis showed that the detection rate of advanced tumors in the colonoscopy group was greater than that of the FIT group [2.76% vs 2.17%, odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.65, P = 0.037]. There was no significant difference in the detection rate of advanced tumors between the colonoscopy group and the graded screening group (2.76% vs 2.35%, OR = 1.9, 95%CI: 0.93-1.51, P = 0.156), as well as between the graded screening group and the FIT group (2.35% vs 2.17%, OR = 1.09%, 95%CI: 0.88-1.34, P = 0.440). The number of colonoscopy examinations required for each patient with advanced tumors was used as an index to evaluate the colonoscopy load during population screening. The graded screening group had the highest colonoscopy load (15.4 times), followed by the colonoscopy group (10.2 times), and the FIT group had the lowest (7.8 times).
CONCLUSION A hierarchical screening strategy based on CRC risk assessment is feasible for screening for CRC in the population. It can be used as an effective supplement to traditional colonoscopy and FIT screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Xu
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jing-Yi Yang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450052, Henan Province, China
| | - Tao Meng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College of Medicine, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang ZM, Pan SP, Zhang JJ, Zhou J. Prediction and analysis of albumin-bilirubin score combined with liver function index and carcinoembryonic antigen on liver metastasis of colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 16:1670-1680. [PMID: 38983332 PMCID: PMC11230030 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 04/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignant tumor, and liver metastasis is one of the main recurrence and metastasis modes that seriously affect patients' survival rate and quality of life. Indicators such as albumin bilirubin (ALBI) score, liver function index, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) have shown some potential in the prediction of liver metastasis but have not been fully explored. AIM To evaluate its predictive value for liver metastasis of CRC by conducting the combined analysis of ALBI, liver function index, and CEA, and to provide a more accurate liver metastasis risk assessment tool for clinical treatment guidance. METHODS This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients with CRC who received surgical treatment in our hospital from January 2018 to July 2023 and were followed up for 24 months. According to the follow-up results, the enrolled patients were divided into a liver metastasis group and a nonliver metastasis group and randomly divided into a modeling group and a verification group at a ratio of 2:1. The risk factors for liver metastasis in patients with CRC were analyzed, a prediction model was constructed by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) logistic regression, internal validation was performed by the bootstrap method, the reliability of the prediction model was evaluated by subject-work characteristic curves, calibration curves, and clinical decision curves, and a column graph was drawn to show the prediction results. RESULTS Of 130 patients were enrolled in the modeling group and 65 patients were enrolled in the verification group out of the 195 patients with CRC who fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Through LASSO regression variable screening and logistic regression analysis. The ALBI score, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and CEA were found to be independent predictors of liver metastases in CRC patients [odds ratio (OR) = 8.062, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.545-25.540], (OR = 1.037, 95%CI: 1.004-1.071) and (OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.008-1.043). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the combined prediction of CRLM in the modeling group was 0.921, with a sensitivity of 78.0% and a specificity of 95.0%. The H-index was 0.921, and the H-L fit curve had χ2 = 0.851, a P value of 0.654, and a slope of the calibration curve approaching 1. This indicates that the model is extremely accurate, and the clinical decision curve demonstrates that it can be applied effectively in the real world. We conducted internal verification of one thousand resamplings of the modeling group data using the bootstrap method. The AUC was 0.913, while the accuracy was 0.869 and the kappa consistency was 0.709. The combination prediction of liver metastasis in patients with CRC in the verification group had an AUC of 0.918, sensitivity of 85.0%, specificity of 95.6%, C-index of 0.918, and an H-L fitting curve with χ 2 = 0.586, P = 0.746. CONCLUSION The ALBI score, ALT level, and CEA level have a certain value in predicting liver metastasis in patients with CRC. These three criteria exhibit a high level of efficacy in forecasting liver metastases in patients diagnosed with CRC. The risk prediction model developed in this work shows great potential for practical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhan-Mei Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| | - Shu-Ping Pan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Feicheng People’s Hospital, Feicheng 271600, Shandong Province, China
| | - Jing-Jing Zhang
- Department of Anus and Intestine Surgery, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha 410008, Hunan Province, China
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Oncology, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao), Cheeloo College Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao 266000, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roshandel G, Ghasemi-Kebria F, Malekzadeh R. Colorectal Cancer: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1530. [PMID: 38672612 PMCID: PMC11049480 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 04/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second most common cause of cancer mortality worldwide. There are disparities in the epidemiology of CRC across different populations, most probably due to differences in exposure to lifestyle and environmental factors related to CRC. Prevention is the most effective method for controlling CRC. Primary prevention includes determining and avoiding modifiable risk factors (e.g., alcohol consumption, smoking, and dietary factors) as well as increasing protective factors (e.g., physical activity, aspirin). Further studies, especially randomized, controlled trials, are needed to clarify the association between CRC incidence and exposure to different risk factors or protective factors. Detection and removal of precancerous colorectal lesions is also an effective strategy for controlling CRC. Multiple factors, both at the individual and community levels (e.g., patient preferences, availability of screening modalities, costs, benefits, and adverse events), should be taken into account in designing and implementing CRC screening programs. Health policymakers should consider the best decision in identifying the starting age and selection of the most effective screening strategies for the target population. This review aims to present updated evidence on the epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention of CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gholamreza Roshandel
- Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan 49178-67439, Iran; (G.R.); (F.G.-K.)
| | - Fatemeh Ghasemi-Kebria
- Golestan Research Center of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan 49178-67439, Iran; (G.R.); (F.G.-K.)
| | - Reza Malekzadeh
- Digestive Oncology Research Center, Digestive Diseases Research Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 14117-13135, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Evaluation of combined detection of multigene mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation in stool specimens for colorectal cancer early diagnosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1231-1238. [PMID: 35499710 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04170-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Molecular diagnostics of colorectal cancer (CRC) can be used as an auxiliary approach for patients recommended for colonoscopy, providing more CRC supplemental diagnosis options. This study investigated whether combined detection of KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation can serve as auxiliary diagnostics in clinical management. METHODS KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation in stool samples from healthy donors, patients with CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), non-advanced adenoma (NAA), or other gastroenterological diseases were evaluated using quantitative PCR (qPCR) or methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MSP). Test accuracy was determined by evaluating the tests' sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), or positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR). RESULTS The combined fecal KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SFRP2/SDC2 methylation detection test achieved a sensitivity of 88.57% with a PPV of 93.64% and a PLR of 7.10 for CRC patients. In comparison, the corresponding parameters for multigene mutation were 46.67%, 92.59%, and 36.26 and 83.81%, 93.94%, and 7.47, for DNA methylation, separately. The sensitivity of the combined test, gene mutation test, and DNA methylation test approach was 75%, 28.26%, and 72.83%. Furthermore, the specificity of this approach in the NAA group was 79.49%. Meanwhile, the overall diagnostic specificity for the combined test in NAA, healthy control, and interference groups was 88.42%. In addition, the sensitivity of the combined detection method increased with the disease stage in CRC patients and elevated along with the lesion size (≥ 1 cm) in AA patients. CONCLUSION Combined detection of fecal KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SFRP2/SDC2 methylation has potential application value for the auxiliary diagnosis of CRC and AA.
Collapse
|
5
|
Syed Soffian SS, Mohammed Nawi A, Hod R, Abdul Manaf MR, Chan HK, Abu Hassan MR. Disparities in Recommendations for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Average-Risk Individuals: An Ecobiosocial Approach. Healthc Policy 2022; 15:1025-1043. [PMID: 35599752 PMCID: PMC9115807 DOI: 10.2147/rmhp.s359450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Regardless of the high global burden of colorectal cancer (CRC), the uptake of CRC screening varies across countries. This systematic review aimed to provide a picture of the disparities in recommendations for CRC screening in average-risk individuals using an ecobiosocial approach. It was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The literature search was conducted through Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and EBSCOHost. Full-text guidelines which were published between 2011 and 2021, along with guidelines which provided recommendations on CRC screening in average-risk individuals, were included in the review. However, guidelines focusing only on a single screening modality were excluded. Fourteen guidelines fulfilling the eligibility criteria were retained for the final review and analysis. Quality assessment of each guideline was performed using the AGREE II instrument. Disparities in guidelines identified in this review were classified into ecological (screening modalities and strategies), biological (recommended age, gender and ethnicities), and social (smoking history, socioeconomic status, and behavior) factors. In general, unstandardized practices in CRC screening for average-risk individuals are likely attributable to the inconsistent and non-specific recommendations in the literature. This review calls on stakeholders and policymakers to review the existing colorectal cancer screening practices and pursue standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Azmawati Mohammed Nawi
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
- Correspondence: Azmawati Mohammed Nawi, Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia, Tel +60 3 9145 8408, Email
| | - Rozita Hod
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Rizal Abdul Manaf
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, 56000, Malaysia
| | - Huan-Keat Chan
- Clinical Research Center, Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital, Alor Setar, 05400, Kedah, Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dolatkhah R, Somi MH, Dastgiri S, Asghari Jafarabadi M, Mashhadi Abdolahi H, Shanehbandi D, Asadi M, Nezamdoust M, Dolatkhah N, Farassati F. Cross-cultural validation of stool Based Colorectal cancer screening methods in the North West of Iran. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2022; 76:103494. [PMID: 35345791 PMCID: PMC8956879 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of death from cancer. Incidence and mortality from CRCboth can be reduced and prevented using screening and early detection programs. The current study aimed to assess the feasibility of the colorectal cancer screening program in Northwest of Iran. Methods The study designed as a cross-cultural analytic study, to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stool-based tests compared with colonoscopy, during 2016–2020. All individuals first were assessed with our CRC risk assessment tool, then eligible volunteers entered the study. Colonoscopy was performed on all participants, also stool-based tests including traditional guaiac, high-sensitivity guaiac-based, fecal immunochemical test (FIT), and multitarget stool DNA (Mt-sDNA) panel tests were performed. Results Mt-sDNA test panel had a sensitivity of 77.8% (95% CI: 40–97.2)for detecting colorectal cancer with a specificity of 91.2% (95% CI:85.4–95.2). The FIT test alone had a lower sensitivity (66.7%; 95% CI:29.9–92.5) and almost the same specificity of 93.9% (95% CI: 88.7–97.2) for cancer detection. Mt-sDNA test had better diagnostic accuracy than the FIT (AUC = 0.85 vs 0.80), and is a more useful screening test. Positive and negative predictive values for cancer detection for both Mt-sDNA and FIT tests were almost the same results, however Mt-sDNA test had better NPV results than the FIT test alone. Conclusion Our results showed that both Mt-sDNA panel and the FIT test had acceptable cut-off points for cancer detection, however, Mt-sDNA test had better diagnostic accuracy. A priority of Iranian health policy must be to develop an executive plan to identify the appropriate CRC screening method. This study provides a first step toward the design of a population-based CRC screening program in East Azerbaijan, Iran. The current study has been performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of stool-based tests for CRC screening. Our results showed that both Mt-sDNA panel and the FIT test had acceptable cut-off points for cancer detection. Among four stool -based tests, Mt-sDNA test had the highest sensitivity for detection of cancer and advanced adenoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Dolatkhah
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Somi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Saeed Dastgiri
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
- Dept. Of Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Zanjan University of Medical Sciences, Zanjan, Iran
| | - Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Dariush Shanehbandi
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Milad Asadi
- Immunology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.,Department of Basic Oncology, Health Institute of Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
| | | | - Neda Dolatkhah
- Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Research Center, Aging Research Institute, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Faris Farassati
- Midwest Biomedical Research Foundation, Kansas City, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dolatkhah R, Dastgiri S, Jafarabadi MA, Abdolahi HM, Somi MH. Diagnostic Accuracy of Multitarget Stool DNA Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2022; 45:753-766. [PMID: 35101601 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Revised: 01/18/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to collect and summarize test data and conduct a meta-analysis, with respect to the Multitarget Stool DNA test sensitivity and specificity, compared to colonoscopy. All manuscripts were screened for eligibility according to inclusion criteria. Participants were a normal population at an average risk of developing CRC. Intervention was Stool based and DNA panel tests compared with colonoscopy, and outcome was detection of CRC and any pre-cancerous lesions. Inter-study and inconsistency (using the I-squared test) were assessed. Meta-analyses of the Mt-sDNA test showed a combined sensitivity of 89%, 51%, and 76% for the detection of CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), and combined CRC and AA, respectively. The overall specificity was 91%, 89%, and 90% for the detection of CRC, AA, and combined CRC and AA, respectively. Mt-sDNA had significantly acceptable diagnostic accuracy for CRC and AA diagnosis, but still has lower sensitivity and specificity than colonoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roya Dolatkhah
- Hematology and Oncology Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| | - Saeed Dastgiri
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi
- Cabrini Research, Cabrini Health, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia; Road and Traffic Injury Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Hossein Mashhadi Abdolahi
- Tabriz Health Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hossein Somi
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23020852. [PMID: 35055034 PMCID: PMC8776048 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 70] [Impact Index Per Article: 35.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Less than half of cases are diagnosed when the cancer is locally advanced. CRC is a heterogenous disease associated with a number of genetic or somatic mutations. Diagnostic markers are used for risk stratification and early detection, which might prolong overall survival. Nowadays, the widespread use of semi-invasive endoscopic methods and feacal blood tests characterised by suboptimal accuracy of diagnostic results has led to the detection of cases at later stages. New molecular noninvasive tests based on the detection of CRC alterations seem to be more sensitive and specific then the current methods. Therefore, research aiming at identifying molecular markers, such as DNA, RNA and proteins, would improve survival rates and contribute to the development of personalized medicine. The identification of “ideal” diagnostic biomarkers, having high sensitivity and specificity, being safe, cheap and easy to measure, remains a challenge. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in novel diagnostic biomarkers for tumor tissue, blood and stool samples in CRC patients.
Collapse
|
9
|
He S, Zhou C, Peng H, Lin M. Recent advances in fecal gene detection for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Biomark Med 2021; 15:1299-1308. [PMID: 34544268 DOI: 10.2217/bmm-2021-0269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
There has been a gradual increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) in recent years. Most patients lack obvious early symptoms, but are commonly in mid and advanced stages when the symptoms become evident, with rather high mortalities. Early diagnosis, treatment and recurrence monitoring are crucial to improving the recovery rate of CRC. Studies have shown that tumor-related genes can be detected in the feces of CRC patients. Owing to non-invasiveness, convenient sampling and continuous dynamic monitoring, fecal gene detection may be applicable to CRC screening, diagnosis, prognostic assessment and recurrence monitoring. Herein, we review the research advances in fecal gene detection for CRC diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siyu He
- Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou People's Hospital (Postgraduate training base of Dalian Medical University), Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chenglin Zhou
- Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou People's Hospital (Postgraduate training base of Dalian Medical University), Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, China
| | - Hailin Peng
- Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou People's Hospital (Postgraduate training base of Dalian Medical University), Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, China
| | - Mei Lin
- Clinical Laboratory, Taizhou People's Hospital (Postgraduate training base of Dalian Medical University), Taizhou, 225300, Jiangsu, China
| |
Collapse
|