Symptomatic management for gastroparesis: antiemetics, analgesics, and symptom modulators

Nutritional aspects in patients with gastroparesis

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to highlight most recent updates on nutritional aspects in gastroparesis (GP) focusing on dietary recommendations, utilization of enteral and parenteral nutrition, endoscopic and surgical interventions.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent data addressed eating patterns, nutritional interventions, and clarifications on the role of endoscopic and surgical interventions underlying an impact on nutritional management of GP patients. They support the importance of gastroparesis-specific diet in addition to drug therapy, and confirm the benefits of a modified low-fat, low-fiber diet. Current guidelines suggest a new approach to GP management based on predominant symptoms. Gastric peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) and surgical gastric electrical stimulator (GES) placement may be considered in individuals with nausea and vomiting before the need for jejunostomy tube placement for enteral feeding or parenteral nutrition.

SUMMARY

Current literature supports the importance of dietary interventions, focusing on low-fat and low-fiber diets, in addition to drug therapies. Severely fiber-restrictive diets may not be necessary. There is enhanced understanding when jejunal feeding should be incorporated for refractory cases with consideration of G-POEM or/and GES even before jejunal tube placement. This approach will require patient evaluation in specialized motility centers.

Current and emerging pharmacotherapy for the treatment of gastroparesis

INTRODUCTION

Gastroparesis is a chronic disorder characterized by decreased gastric emptying and presents with nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain which impacts patients' quality of life greatly. The treatment modalities available for gastroparesis have been expanding over the past 2 decades. Currently, there are multiple options available for gastroparesis, albeit with only one FDA-approved medication until June 2021.

AREAS COVERED

We review the different treatments available for gastroparesis and discuss the recently FDA-approved intranasal formulation of metoclopramide. This nasal spray guarantees metoclopramide absorption within 15 min of application bypassing first pass metabolism in the liver and overcoming the limitations of the oral formulation not passing into the small intestine for absorption because of a gastroparetic stomach or a patient unable to take the oral metoclopramide because of nausea and vomiting.

EXPERT OPINION

We now find ourselves in an oasis after spending many years in a 'desert' regarding pharmacologic therapies available for gastroparesis. The expansion of the research involving dopamine receptor antagonists and delving into alternative mechanisms of alleviating gastroparesis symptoms has been crucial in the landscape of gastroparesis. This is especially true as our knowledge of gastroparesis has proven that simply improving gastric emptying does not necessarily translate to clinical improvement.

A cross-sectional study describing peripheral neuropathy in patients with symptoms of gastroparesis: associations with etiology, gastrointestinal symptoms, and gastric emptying

Background

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is present in diabetic gastroparesis but is not described in idiopathic gastroparesis.

Aims

(1) Determine prevalence of PN in idiopathic gastroparesis; (2) assess if patients with symptoms of gastroparesis and PN differ in gastric emptying and symptoms, both gastrointestinal and psychosocial, from patients without PN (nPN); (3) compare this relationship to that in other etiological groups.

Methods

250 patients with symptoms of gastroparesis underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy and answered questionnaires including severity of gastroparesis symptoms using the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and presence of peripheral neuropathy using the Neuropathy Total Symptom Score-6 (NTSS-6).

Results

PN, defined by NTSS-6 > 6, was present in 70/250 (28%) patients: 22/148 (15%) idiopathic, 33/61 (54%) diabetic, and 11/32 (34%) postsurgical (p < 0.01). Among 148 patients with symptoms of idiopathic gastroparesis, defined as non-diabetic, non-postsurgical, and not caused by a known disorder such as Parkinson’s or connective tissue disease, symptoms of gastroparesis were more severe in PN than nPN: bloating (4.05 ± 1.17 vs. 2.99 ± 1.61, p < 0.01), abdominal distension (3.86 ± 1.49 vs. 2.45 ± 1.68, p < 0.01), and upper abdominal pain (3.64 ± 1.22 vs. 2.71 ± 1.78, p = 0.03). Ninety-nine idiopathic patients underwent gastric emptying scintigraphy: 7/43 (16%) patients with delayed gastric emptying and 9/56 (16%) patients with normal gastric emptying had PN. Among patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, abdominal distension (4.43 ± 0.53 vs. 2.89 ± 1.68, p = 0.01) was more severe in PN than nPN. The association of PN and worse gastrointestinal symptoms was not as apparent in patients with symptoms of diabetic or postsurgical gastroparesis.

Conclusions

PN was present in 70/250 (28%) of patients with symptoms of gastroparesis and was present to a lesser extent in idiopathic than diabetic gastroparesis. The presence of PN in IG was associated with more severe gastroparetic symptoms than in nPN. Screening for PN may help identify a gastroparesis cohort with peripheral neuropathy who are more symptomatic.

Metoclopramide nasal spray for management of symptoms of acute and recurrent diabetic gastroparesis in adults

Introduction: Gastroparesis (GP) is characterized by delayed gastric emptying in the absence of mechanical obstruction. About 75% of GP patients are females. Diabetes and idiopathic are the two commonest etiologies of GP. Up to two-thirds of the GP patients do not have significant symptom responses to medical therapies, and there is a paucity of available oral prokinetic agents with only one medication approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for this indication. The oral and parenteral formulations of metoclopramide were FDA approved in 1979 to treat symptoms of acute and recurrent diabetic GP. Now, more than 40 years later, a nasal preparation of metoclopramide (Gimoti^TM) was approved in June 2020 for the same indication.Areas covered: PubMed search using the keywords 'nasal metoclopramide' and 'diabetic gastroparesis.' This article aims to provide a concise review of the pharmacology, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of nasal metoclopramide.Expert opinion: The nasal formulation can be systemically absorbed without relying on the passage through a poorly emptying stomach, thus assuring the delivery of a therapeutic dose of metoclopramide, even during episodes of vomiting. Hence, metoclopramide nasal spray has the potential to be used during an acute flare, potentially avoiding hospitalizations.

Gastroparesis in the Hospital Setting

Gastroparesis (GP) is commonly seen in hospitalized patients. Refractory vomiting and related dehydration, electrolyte abnormalities, and malnutrition are indications for hospital admission. In addition, tube feeding intolerance is a common sign of gastric dysmotility in critically ill patients. The diagnosis and management of GP in the hospital setting can be quite challenging. Diagnostic tests are often deferred because of patient intolerance of the oral meal for standard scintigraphy or severity of the primary disease. The diagnosis of GP is often established on the basis of clinical scenario and risk factors for gastric motor dysfunction. Medical therapy in GP is directed toward controlling nausea and vomiting by prokinetic and antinausea medications and correcting nutrition risks or treating malnutrition with nutrition therapy. Enteral nutrition is the preferred nutrition intervention for patients with GP. Delayed gastric emptying in critically ill patients has a negative impact on the timely delivery of enteral feeding and meeting the energy and protein goals. Measures to improve gastric tolerance or provide feeding beyond the stomach are often needed, since early enteral nutrition has been an important target of therapy for critically ill patients. This review will address the current understanding of the mechanisms of GP and feeding intolerance in critical illness, diagnostic workup, drug therapies, and interventions to improve the provision of enteral nutrition in hospital settings when gastric dysmotility is present or suspected.

Symptomatic Management of Gastroparesis

Gastroparesis is a chronic and debilitating neuromuscular disorder of the upper gastrointestinal tract. Symptoms of gastroparesis include nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, early satiety, and weight loss. Treating gastroparesis can be difficult. Dietary changes may improve symptoms in patients with mild disease. A variety of medications can be used to treat symptoms of nausea and vomiting, although most have not been subjected to randomized controlled trials and only one is approved by the Food and Drug Administration (metoclopramide). Pain management is essential, as nearly 90% of patients report symptoms of epigastric pain. This article reviews treatment options for symptoms of gastroparesis.

Aprepitant Has Mixed Effects on Nausea and Reduces Other Symptoms in Patients With Gastroparesis and Related Disorders

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There are few effective treatments for nausea and other symptoms in patients with gastroparesis and related syndromes. We performed a randomized trial of the ability of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to reduce symptoms in patients with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome.

METHODS

We conducted a 4-week multicenter, double-masked trial of 126 patients with at least moderate symptoms of chronic nausea and vomiting of presumed gastric origin for a minimum of 6 months. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given oral aprepitant (125 mg/day, n = 63) or placebo (n = 63). The primary outcome from the intention-to-treat analysis was reduction in nausea, defined as a decrease of 25 mm or more, or absolute level below 25 mm, on a daily patient-reported 0-to-100 visual analog scale (VAS) of nausea severity. We calculated relative risks of nausea improvement using stratified Cochran-Mental-Haenszel analysis.

RESULTS

Aprepitant did not reduce symptoms of nausea, based on the primary outcome measure (46% reduction in the VAS score in the aprepitant group vs 40% reduction in the placebo group; relative risk, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.8-1.7) (P = .43). However, patients in the aprepitant group had significant changes in secondary outcomes such as reduction in symptom severity (measured by the 0-5 Gastroparesis Clinical Symptom Index) for nausea (1.8 vs 1.0; P = .005), vomiting (1.6 vs 0.5; P = .001), and overall symptoms (1.3 vs 0.7; P = .001). Adverse events, predominantly mild or moderate in severity grade, were more common in aprepitant (22 of 63 patients, 35% vs 11 of 63, 17% in the placebo group) (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

In a randomized trial of patients with chronic nausea and vomiting caused by gastroparesis or gastroparesis-like syndrome, aprepitant did not reduce the severity of nausea when reduction in VAS score was used as the primary outcome. However, aprepitant had varying effects on secondary outcomes of symptom improvement. These findings support the need to identify appropriate patient outcomes for trials of therapies for gastroparesis, including potential additional trials for aprepitant. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01149369.