How to measure outcomes of peripheral nerve surgery

Outcome measures used in peripheral nerve surgery for symptomatic neuroma in upper extremity amputations: A scoping review

Novel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult-acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi-center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.

A systematic review of clinical and laboratory studies comparing vascularised versus non-vascularised nerve grafts in peripheral nerve reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) are common, with complex defects posing a significant reconstructive challenge. Although vascularised (VNGs) and non-vascularised nerve grafts (NVNGs) are established treatment options, there is no comprehensive summary of the evidence supporting their clinical, electrophysiological, and histological outcomes. This review aims to systematically evaluate the clinical and laboratory literature comparing VNGs and NVNGs to inform future clinical practice and research.

METHODS

This review was prospectively registered and reported according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and the Cochrane Register were systematically searched. Studies comparing VNGs and NVNGs in PNIs were included. Meta-analyses were performed for outcomes reported in ≥3 laboratory studies. Functional outcomes were synthesised by vote-counting based on direction of effect for clinical studies. Risk-of-bias was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and SYRCLE, and the certainty of evidence was evaluated using GRADE.

RESULTS

Seven clinical and 34 laboratory studies were included. Of the clinical comparisons, 90% and 56% identified an effect on recovery of sensibility (p = 0.01) and motor function (p = 0.05), respectively, that favoured VNGs. Nine (of 13) separate meta-analyses of laboratory studies demonstrated reduced muscular atrophy, superior axonal regeneration, and remyelination in VNGs. VNGs eliminated the 3-day interval of ischaemia otherwise sustained by NVNGs. Overall, the quality of evidence was low.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review indicates that VNGs may offer some advantages over NVNGs in PNI reconstruction. However, due to the low quality of evidence, significant statistical heterogeneity, and clinical diversity of the included studies, these conclusions should be interpreted with caution. Further high-quality clinical trials are necessary to validate these findings.

The clinical effects of artificial dermis in the treatment of skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by bone or tendon exposure

OBJECTIVE

The clinical effects of artificial dermis in treating skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by bone or tendon exposure were assessed.

APPROACH

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 45 cases of skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by bone or tendon exposure admitted to the trauma surgery department of Fujian Provincial Hospital between February 2018 and August 2020. They were divided into the artificial dermis and control groups. The wound was assessed using the Vancouver Scar Scale (mVSS), and the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores were recorded at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery. At the 12-month after surgery, skin sensation recovery was evaluated using the criteria of the British Medical Research Council (BMRC).

RESULTS

The cases included 26 males and 19 females, aged 50 to 85 years. All patients were followed up for an average of 13.8 months (range: 12-18 months). Compared with controls, the wound healing time of the observation group was longer (35.8 ± 10.6 vs. 28.5 ± 4.8, P = 0.007), without significant differences for the number of operations and length of hospitalization. The mVSS scores were not different between groups (Pgroup = 0.294), but the scores decreased with time (Ptime < 0.001), and the group×time interaction was significant (Pinteraction < 0.001). Similarly, the VAS scores were not different between groups (Pgroup = 0.667), but the scores decreased with time (Ptime < 0.001); the group×time interaction was not significant (Pinteraction = 0.274). At the 12-month mark following the operation, in the artificial dermis group, the MCRR score was S3+ in 23 patients, while it ranged from S0 to S3 in two patients; in the control group, S3+ was observed in 17 patients, and S0-S3 in three (P = 0.815).

CONCLUSION

Artificial dermis treatment is considered a safe and effective alternative therapy for patients with skin and soft tissue defects accompanied by bone or tendon exposure who cannot tolerate or are unwilling to undergo autologous skin flap transplantation. It offers the advantages of minimal donor site trauma, simplicity in operation, and favorable postoperative functional recovery.

Sensory nerve transfers in the upper limb after peripheral nerve injury: a scoping review

Nerve transfer for motor nerve paralysis is an established technique for treating complex nerve injuries. However, nerve transfer for sensory reconstruction has not been widely used, and published research on this topic is limited compared to motor nerve transfer. The indications and outcomes of nerve transfer for the restoration of sensory function remain unproven. This scoping review examines the indications, outcomes and complications of sensory nerve transfer. In total, 22 studies were included; the major finding is that distal sensory nerve transfers are more successful than proximal ones in succeeding protective sensation. Although the risk of extension of the sensory deficit with donor site loss and morbidity from neuromas remain a barrier to wider adoption, these complications were not reported in the review. Further, the scarcity of studies and small patient series limit the ability to determine sensory nerve transfer success. However, sensory restoration remains an opportunity for surgeons to pursue.Level of evidence: II.

The outcomes of peripheral nerve surgeries in Africa: Narrative synthesis from existing literature

BACKGROUND

In Africa, peripheral nerve pathologies are a major source of disability, and the results of surgical therapies differ greatly among countries. The goal of this narrative review is to compile the most recent data on peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa, pinpoint critical variables that affect surgical outcomes, and offer suggestions for enhancing patient care.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature review was conducted, focusing on studies published over the past four decades. The sources included peer-reviewed journals, hospital records, and reports from healthcare organizations. The review examined outcomes related to functional recovery, quality of life, and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The outcomes of peripheral nerve surgeries in Africa are influenced by the availability of medical infrastructure, the level of surgeon expertise, and the timeliness of the intervention. Urban centers with better resources tend to report more favorable outcomes, whereas rural areas face significant challenges. Common barriers include limited access to advanced surgical tools, a shortage of specialized surgeons, and inadequate postoperative care and rehabilitation services. Despite these challenges, successful interventions have been reported, particularly in settings where targeted training programs and international collaborations are in place.

CONCLUSION

Enhancing surgeon training programs, building comprehensive postoperative care and rehabilitation facilities, and investing in healthcare infrastructure are critical to improving peripheral nerve surgery results in Africa. International and regional collaborations can be extremely helpful in advancing these initiatives by enabling the sharing of knowledge and granting access to cutting-edge methods. Patients with peripheral nerve injuries across the continent may experience improved functional recovery and overall quality of life if these criteria are met.

In-Vivo MRI in Rodents: A Protocol for Optimal Animal Positioning

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potentially powerful novel peripheral nerve diagnosis technique. To determine its validity, in-vivo preclinical studies are necessary. However, when using a rodent model, positioning rats and achieving high-resolution images can be challenging. We present a short report that outlines an optimal protocol for positioning rats for in-vivo MRI acquisition. Female Sprague-Dawley rats with sciatic nerve injury were induced into anesthesia using 4% isoflurane in oxygen and maintained at 1.5%. Rats were placed into a plexiglass cradle in a right lateral recumbent position, and a surface coil was placed over the left leg. Respiration rate and body temperature were monitored throughout the scan. Our protocol was successful as rats were able to undergo MRI scanning safely and efficiently. There were no adverse reactions, and clear images of the left sciatic nerve were obtained. Animal positioning took 30 minutes, and 5 different acquisitions were obtained in 2 hours. The total time from anesthesia induction to recovery was under 3 hours. Given the increasing interest in MRI diagnostic techniques, we hope this report aids other researchers studying peripheral nerve injury imaging in rat models.

Both Type I Bovine Collagen Conduits and Porcine Small Intestine Submucosa Conduits Result in Functional Sensory Recovery Following Peripheral Nerve Microsurgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

The study purpose was to measure and compare the time to functional sensory recovery (FSR) and incidence of FSR by 6 and 12 months between type I bovine collagen conduits versus porcine small intestine submucosa (SIS) conduits with primary neurorrhaphy for peripheral nerve injury repair.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were conducted. The predictor variable was the type of conduit-either bovine collagen or porcine SIS. The primary outcome variable was the number of months between surgery and the patient achieving FSR. The secondary outcome variable was the proportion of patients who achieved FSR that did so by 6 and 12 months. A log-rank test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the differences observed in the overall time-to-FSR data and by 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

We screened 67 publications of which 8 were included. The sample sizes were 137 and 96 patients for the bovine collagen and porcine SIS groups, respectively. The median time to FSR for the bovine collagen conduit group was 9 months (interquartile range: 6); the median time to FSR for the porcine SIS conduit group 6 months (interquartile range: 3 months) (P = .50). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 42% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 64% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 6 months (P < .01). Of the patients who achieved FSR, 94% of patients with bovine collagen conduits and 82% of patients with porcine SIS conduits did so within 12 months (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Although a significant difference was found in the incidence of FSR at 6 and 12 months, no significant difference was found in overall time to FSR, supporting the use of either conduit for peripheral nerve repair.

Evaluating Outcomes Following Nerve Repair: Beyond the Medical Research Council

Peripheral nerve injuries are common and remain a significant health challenge. Outcome measurements are used to evaluate injury, monitor recovery after nerve repair, and compare scientific advances. Clinical judgement is required to determine which available tools are most applicable, which requires a vast understanding of the available outcome measurements. In this article we discuss the highest yield tools available for clinical application.

Upper-Extremity Nerve Transfers for Sensation: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Sensory nerve transfers may be performed to restore protective sensation and tactile perception after peripheral nerve injury in the upper extremity. There is a paucity of literature on the available donor-recipient configurations for sensory nerve transfers. This article presents a systematic review of reported sensory nerve transfers in the upper extremity.

METHODS

Original articles published between 1982 and 2022 were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE. Articles describing a sensory nerve transfer were included if patient sensory outcomes were reported. Outcomes were categorized according to the modified British Medical Research Council scale, with an outcome of S3 or better defined as satisfactory.

RESULTS

Of 1,049 articles, 39 met inclusion and quality criteria. Twenty-seven articles were primary research studies reporting on 197 patients who underwent 11 unique nondigital sensory donor nerve transfers and 24 unique digital donor nerve transfer procedures. The most reliable recipient nerve for restoring sensation to the ulnar border of the small finger was proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger (38 patients, 89% satisfactory sensory outcome). The best available donors for transfer into the proper ulnar digital nerve of the small finger were proper ulnar digital nerve of the long finger (16 patients, 87.5% good sensory outcome) and palmar cutaneous branch of the median nerve (15 patients, 100% good sensory outcome). To restore sensation along the ulnar border of the thumb and radial aspect of the index finger, the best available donor was the superficial branch of the radial nerve, regardless of transfer into common digital nerve 1 (38 patients, success rate 63%) or directly to proper ulnar digital nerve of the thumb or proper radial digital nerve of the index finger (nine patients, success rates 67%).

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes after sensory nerve transfers are generally good. Surgeons should transfer into a digital nerve recipient when attempting to reconstruct sensation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Comparative Effectiveness Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Peripheral Nerve Repair Using Direct Repair and Connector-assisted Repair

Background

This clinical literature systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to assess differences in outcomes between nerves repaired with direct repair (DR) and connector-assisted repair (CAR).

Methods

A systematic literature review for DR and CAR was performed. Studies from 1980 through August 2023 were included if DR or CAR repairs were performed in upper extremities with nerve gaps less than 5 mm and reported sensory Medical Research Council Classification (MRCC) outcomes or equivalent. Comparative analyses were planned for meaningful recovery (MR) rate (at both S3 and S3+ or better), postsurgical neuroma, cold intolerance, altered sensation, pain, and revision rate.

Results

There were significant differences in MR rates for CAR and DR. At the MRCC S3 threshold, 96.1% of CAR and 81.3% of DR achieved MR (P < 0.0001). At the MRCC S3+ threshold, 87.1% of CAR and 54.2% of DR achieved this higher threshold of MR (P < 0.0001). There were no differences in neuroma rate or pain scores in our dataset. Altered sensation (dysesthesia, paresthesia, hyperesthesia, or hypersensitivity) was not discussed in any CAR studies, so no analysis could be performed. The revision rate for both procedures was 0%. The proportion of patients with cold intolerance was 46.2% in the DR studies, which was significantly higher than the 10.7% of patients in the CAR group.

Conclusions

Significantly more patients achieved sensory MR and fewer had cold intolerance when the CAR technique, instead of the DR technique, was performed to repair peripheral nerve injuries.

The role of patient-reported outcomes in peripheral nerve surgery

Measuring the outcome of peripheral nerve surgery is challenging because of the spectrum of functional impairment is dependent on the level and severity of the lesion. There are no nerve-specific patient-reported outcome measures, and no universally accepted outcome measurement both in terms of the parameters to be assessed and the methods and timing of the assessment. Nevertheless, the use of patient-reported outcome measures is fundamental to better understand the needs and expectations of patients, to take advantage of all treatment opportunities to offer the best possible support to these patients. This paper outlines current concepts in the measurement of outcome in peripheral nerve surgery.

Distal Entrapment of Regenerating Peripheral Nerves After a Proximal Injury: A Case Series and Review of the Literature

A complication of peripheral nerve injuries, of which there exists limited discourse, is the entrapment of the nerve as it regenerates from the site of injury to its end target, resulting in the arrest of axon regeneration and a consequent reduction of functional recovery. This proof-of-concept paper reports a review of the relevant literature alongside a case series of patients who presented with this phenomenon and who were treated with targeted peripheral nerve decompression. Three cases were identified prospectively. The baseline function was recorded pre-and post-operatively. Recovery was assessed using various tools, including the Medical Research Council (MRC) motor grading, ten-test sensory testing, Tinel's sign progression, a visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, and the Impact of Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND) patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). The first case sustained a brachial plexus injury and received decompression at the pronator fascia, carpal tunnel, cubital tunnel, and Guyon's canal. The second case sustained a sciatic nerve injury and was managed with peroneal and tarsal tunnel decompressions. The final case sustained a suprascapular nerve injury and underwent decompression at the suprascapular ligament. In all these cases, motor function, sensory function, and pain (depending on the nerve's original components) improved following decompression. A literature review revealed seven relevant studies, including four case reports, two cohort studies, and a pre-clinical animal study. These cases, and those identified in our review of the literature, suggest that targeted decompressive surgery can be an appropriate treatment for patients who display signs of stalled neural regeneration. This study adds to the limited evidence of this phenomenon and highlights the challenges in proving the efficacy of decompressive surgery for this specific complication. This study is limited by the number of cases included, the heterogeneity of nerve injuries presented, and its observational nature. There is a clear need for further research into this phenomenon, and the authors are working towards developing a prospective study that will investigate the indications, value, predictors of success, and practicality of decompression surgery for this complication of peripheral nerve injury.

Patient reported symptoms and disabilities before and after neuroma surgery: a register-based study

Residual problems may occur from neuroma despite surgery. In a 12-month follow-up study using national register data, symptoms, and disabilities related to surgical methods and sex were evaluated in patients surgically treated for a neuroma. Among 196 identified patients (55% men; lower age; preoperative response rate 20%), neurolysis for nerve tethering/scar formation was the most used surgical method (41%; more frequent in women) irrespective of affected nerve. Similar preoperative symptoms were seen in patients, where different surgical methods were performed. Pain on load was the dominating symptom preoperatively. Women scored higher preoperatively at pain on motion without load, weakness and QuickDASH. Pain on load and numbness/tingling in fingers transiently improved. The ability to perform daily activities was better after nerve repair/reconstruction/transposition than after neurolysis. Regression analysis, adjusted for age, sex, and affected nerve, showed no association between surgical method and pain on load, tingling/numbness in fingers, or ability to perform daily activities. Neuroma, despite surgery, causes residual problems, affecting daily life. Choice of surgical method is not strongly related to pre- or postoperative symptoms. Neurolysis has similar outcome as other surgical methods. Women have more preoperative symptoms and disabilities than men. Future research would benefit from a neuroma-specific ICD-code, leading to a more precise identification of patients.

Ulnar nerve anteposition with adipofascial flap, an alternative treatment for severe cubital syndrome

BACKGROUND

Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow is the second most common cause of nerve entrapment in the upper limb. Surgical techniques mainly include simple decompression, decompression with anterior transposition and medial epicondylectomy.

METHODS

We performed decompression with anterior transposition and protected ulnar nerve by adipofascial flap (a random flap with radial based vascularization, harvested through the avascular plane of Scarpa's fascia. We analyzed patients who underwent ulnar nerve ante-position from 2015 to 2022 according to inclusion and exclusion criteria for a total of 57 patients. All patients included were graded on the McGowan's classification Messina criteria and the British Medical Research Council modified by Mackinnon and Dellon.

RESULTS

The average McGowan's score was 2.4 (± 0.6), Messina's criteria 91.2% indicated a satisfactory or excellent result, sensibility at 6 months was 98.5% S3 or more. A preferential technique has not yet been defined.

CONCLUSIONS

The adipofascial flap offers numerous advantages in providing a pliable, vascular fat envelope, which mimics the natural fatty environment of peripheral nerves and creates favorable micro-environmental conditions to contribute to neural regeneration via axon outgrowth.

A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Comparison of Conduits Versus Decellularized Nerve Allograft for Digital Nerve Repairs

PURPOSE

While there are advantages and disadvantages to both processed nerve allografts (PNA) and conduits, a large, well-controlled prospective study is needed to compare the efficacy and to delineate how each of these repair tools can be best applied to digital nerve injuries. We hypothesized that PNA digital nerve repairs would achieve superior functional recovery for longer length gaps compared with conduit-based repairs.

METHODS

Patients (aged 18-69 years) presenting with suspected acute or subacute (less than 24 weeks old) digital nerve injuries were recruited to prticipate at 20 medical centers across the United States. After stratification to short (5-14 mm) and long (15-25 mm) gap subgroups, the patients were randomized (1:1) to repair with either a commercially available PNA or collagen conduit. Baseline and outcomes assessments were obtained either before or immediately after surgery and planned at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months after surgery. All assessors and patients were blinded to the treatment arm.

RESULTS

In total, 220 patients were enrolled, and 183 patients completed an acceptable last evaluable visit (at least 6 months and not more than 15 months postrepair). At last follow-up, for the short gap repair groups, average static two-point discrimination was 7.3 ± 2.8 mm for PNA and 7.5 ± 3.1 mm for conduit repairs. For the long gap group, average static two-point discrimination was significantly lower at 6.1 ± 3.3 mm for PNA compared with 7.5 ± 2.4 mm for conduit repairs. Normal sensation (American Society for Surgery of the Hand scale) was achieved in 40% of PNA long gap repairs, which was significantly more than the 18% observed in long conduit patients. Long gap conduits had more clinical failures (lack of protective sensation) than short gap conduits.

CONCLUSIONS

Although supporting similar levels of nerve regeneration for short gap length digital nerve repairs, PNA was clinically superior to conduits for long gap reconstructions.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Primary Repair versus Reverse End-to-Side Coaptation by Anterior Interosseous Nerve Transfer in Proximal Ulnar Nerve Injuries

BACKGROUND

Proximal ulnar nerve lacerations are challenging to treat because of the complex integration of sensory and motor function in the hand. The purpose of this study was to compare primary repair and primary repair plus anterior interosseous nerve (AIN) reverse end-to-side (RETS) coaptation in the setting of proximal ulnar nerve injuries.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was performed of all patients at a single, academic, level I trauma center from 2014 to 2018 presenting with isolated complete ulnar nerve lacerations. Patients underwent either primary repair (PR) only or primary repair and AIN RETS (PR + RETS). Data collected included demographic information; quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire score; Medical Research Council score; grip and pinch strength; and visual analogue scale pain scores at 6 and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in the study: 28 in the PR group and 32 in the RETS + PR group. There was no difference in demographic variables or location of injury between the two groups. Average quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores for the PR and PR + RETS groups were 65 ± 6 and 36 ± 4 at 6 months and 46 ± 4 and 24 ± 3 at 12 months postoperatively, respectively, and were significantly lower in the PR + RETS group at both points. Average grip and pinch strength were significantly greater for the PR + RETS group at 6 and 12 months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that primary repair of proximal ulnar nerve injuries plus AIN RETS coaptation yielded superior strength and improved upper extremity function when compared with PR alone.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, II.

Outcomes of Sciatic Nerve Injury Repairs: A Systematic Review

Background

The objective of this study was to investigate the surgical repair techniques and the outcomes of sciatic nerve injuries in traumatic wounds.

Methods

A literature search was conducted using the following keywords:sciatic, nerve, repair, technique, conduit, graft, reconstruction, outcome, rehabilitation, recovery, function, surgery, and NOT anesthesia.

Results

In total, 715 studies were retrieved. After abstract review, 13 articles fit the criteria. A total of 2627 repairs were carried out, including nerve grafts (n = 953), suture (n = 482), and neurolysis (n = 1192). Six studies reported good motor outcome, and good sensory outcome was reported across 2 studies. The thigh region accounted for 81.5% of lesions. Sciatic, peroneal, and tibial nerves were all equally affected. Gunshot wounds were the most common mechanism of injury (22.6%).

Conclusions

The cumulative evidence demonstrates sciatic nerve injury repair has poor motor and sensory outcomes. This study shows there is a lack of standardized outcome measures, making comparisons very difficult. Graft lengths of <4 cm within the intermediate region yielded more successful outcomes. Further higher quality studies of nerve transfers in the lower limbs are needed to determine the optimal repair to restore sciatic nerve function.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Provocative Testing in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Recovery

Background  Peripheral nerve function is often difficult to assess given the highly variable presentation and subjective patient experience of nerve injury. If nerve assessment is incomplete or inaccurate, inappropriate diagnosis and subsequent treatment may result in permanent dysfunction. Objective  As our understanding of nerve repair and generation evolves, so have tools for evaluating peripheral nerve function, recovery, and nerve-related impact on the quality of life. Provocative testing is often used in the clinic to identify peripheral nerve dysfunction. Patient-reported outcome forms provide insights regarding the effect of nerve dysfunction on daily activities and quality of life. Methods  We performed a review of the literature using a comprehensive combination of keywords and search algorithms to determine the clinical utility of different provocative tests and patient-reported outcomes measures in a variety of contexts, both pre- and postoperatively. Results  This review may serve as a valuable resource for surgeons determining the appropriate provocative testing tools and patient-reported outcomes forms to monitor nerve function both pre- and postoperatively. Conclusion  As treatments for peripheral nerve injury and dysfunction continue to improve, identifying the most appropriate measures of success may ultimately lead to improved patient outcomes.

Assessment of Motor Function in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Recovery

Introduction

Peripheral nerve injuries can be difficult to diagnose, treat, and monitor given their highly variable presentation. When the status of nerves is not accurately assessed, treatment may be delayed or overlooked and can result in lasting functional deficits. As our understanding of nerve repair and generation evolves, so will tools for evaluating both the functional and morphological status of peripheral nerves.

Objective

There is currently no single article which provides a detailed, comprehensive view of the literature comparing the clinical utility of various assessment modalities. Furthermore, there is no consensus on the optimal assessment algorithm for peripheral nerve injuries.

Methods

We performed a literature review using a comprehensive combination of keywords and search algorithm. The search was focused on clinical data regarding the assessment of peripheral nerves Results: This review may help to determine the appropriate tools that are currently available for monitoring nerve function both pre and postoperatively. Additionally, the review demonstrates possible roles and areas of improvement for each tool used to assess motor function.

Conclusion

As surgeons work to improve treatments for peripheral nerve injury and dysfunction, identifying the most appropriate existing measures of success and future directions for improved algorithms could lead to improved patient outcomes.

Neuropathic Pain Relief after Surgical Neurolysis in Patients with Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Preliminary Report

Objective

To evaluate the usefulness of surgical neurolysis for neuropathic pain relief in patients with posttraumatic brachial plexus injury (BPI).

Methods

A prospective, longitudinal, nonrandomized, self-controlled before and after study was performed to evaluate the pain changes according to their intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and the sensory recovery after surgery using the British Medical Research Council (BMRC) scale for sensory recovery. To establish significant changes, a paired T-test was performed, and in order to determine the magnitude of these changes, an effect size was measured. α = 0.05.

Results

Ten patients were included with an average follow-up of 61.9 ± 53.62 months. The main mechanism of injury was vehicular trauma (70%). A significant decrease in pain after the surgical intervention was observed resulting from an average preoperative state according to VAS of 8.4 ± 1.58, to a postoperative state of 3.4 ± 3.27 (59.52%, p = 0.005, Δ = 1.572), added to a mean sensory improvement (25%) from 2.8 ± 1.62 to 3.5 ± 0.97 after surgery according to BMRC, without statistically significant changes (p=0.062), showing a moderate effect size (Δ = 0.413). Almost all patients showed improvement in the continuous and paroxysmal pattern of pain. No postoperative complications were observed. Discussion. These results suggest that in cases of BPI that originates from a compressive syndrome secondary to the posttraumatic fibrosis that surrounds the nerve structures causing strangulation and inducing hypernociception, the use of surgical neurolysis is an appropriate alternative for patients with medically refractory neuropathic pain.

Outcomes of Flexor Tendon Repair in Patients With Concurrent Neurovascular Injuries of Multiple Digits in Zone 1

PURPOSE

We treated several patients with multiple flexor (flexor digitorum profundus; FDP) injuries accompanied by injuries to the digital nerve or vessels around the distal interphalangeal crease (zone 1). Here, we retrospectively report the outcomes and review the literature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2010 and December 2018, 16 patients who met the study inclusion criteria were investigated. Tendons were repaired using the cross-locked cruciate (Adelaide) technique (6-strand) or modified Becker method (4-strand). The neurovascular structures were repaired under a microscope.

RESULTS

Sixteen patients (47 digits) were treated. According to the criteria of Moiemen and Elliot, the lacerated areas were in zones IA and IB in 7 and 40 digits, respectively. The mean ranges of motion were 149.27 ± 7.78 and 66.43 ± 2.04 degrees according to the Strickland and modified Strickland assessments, respectively. The mean 2-point discrimination was 5.00 ± 0.63 mm. Four patients (group 1) presented with injuries to 2 digits, and 9 (group 2) and 3 (group 3) patients had 3 and 4 injured digits, respectively. The outcomes were satisfactory in terms of the mean range of motion; 2-point discrimination; cold tolerance; visual analog scale pain score; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score; and grip strength. There were no differences among the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Open multiple-finger injuries involving flexor digitorum profundus rupture with concurrent neurovascular injuries on one or both sides occasionally occur in industrial environments. Fortunately, each digit exhibits a consistent injury type in a particular anatomical location; appropriate repair yields satisfactory outcomes despite the presence of multiple injuries.

Closing the Gap: Bridging Peripheral Sensory Nerve Defects with a Chitosan-Based Conduit a Randomized Prospective Clinical Trial

Introduction: If tensionless nerve coaptation is not possible, bridging the resulting peripheral nerve defect with an autologous nerve graft is still the current gold standard. The concept of conduits as an alternative with different materials and architectures, such as autologous vein conduits or bioartificial nerve conduits, could not replace the nerve graft until today. Chitosan, as a relatively new biomaterial, has recently demonstrated exceptional biocompatibility and material stability with neural lineage cells. The purpose of this prospective randomized clinical experiment was to determine the efficacy of chitosan-based nerve conduits in regenerating sensory nerves in the hand. Materials and methods: Forty-seven patients with peripheral nerve defects up to 26 mm distal to the carpal tunnel were randomized to receive either a chitosan conduit or an autologous nerve graft with the latter serving as the control group. Fifteen patients from the conduit group and seven patients from the control group were available for a 12-month follow-up examination. The primary outcome parameter was tactile gnosis measured with two-point discrimination. The secondary outcome parameters were Semmens Weinstein Monofilament Testing, self-assessed pain, and patient satisfaction. Results: Significant improvement (in static two-point discrimination) was observed six months after trauma (10.7 ± 1.2 mm; p < 0.05) for chitosan-based nerve conduits, but no further improvement was observed after 12 months of regeneration (10.9 ± 1.3 mm). After six months and twelve months, the autologous nerve graft demonstrated comparable results to the nerve conduit, with a static two-point discrimination of 11.0 ± 2.0 mm and 7.9 ± 1.1 mm. Semmes Weinstein Filament Testing in the nerve conduit group showed a continuous improvement over the regeneration period by reaching from 3.1 ± 0.3 after three months up to 3.7 ± 0.4 after twelve months. Autologous nerve grafts presented similar results: 3.3 ± 0.4 after three months and 3.7 ± 0.5 after twelve months. Patient satisfaction and self-reported pain levels were similar between the chitosan nerve conduit and nerve graft groups. One patient required revision surgery due to complications associated with the chitosan nerve tube. Conclusion: Chitosan-based nerve conduits are safe and suitable for bridging nerve lesions up to 26 mm in the hand. Tactile gnosis improved significantly during the early regeneration period, and functional outcomes were similar to those obtained with an autologous nerve graft. Thus, chitosan appears to be a sufficient substitute for autologous nerve grafts in the treatment of small nerve defects in the hand.

Clinical Assessment of Pain and Sensory Function in Peripheral Nerve Injury and Recovery: A Systematic Review of Literature

Peripheral nerve injuries (PNIs) often present with variable symptoms, making them difficult to diagnose, treat, and monitor. When neurologic compromise is inadequately assessed, suboptimal treatment decisions can result in lasting functional deficits. There are many available tools for evaluating pain and functional status of peripheral nerves. However, the literature lacks a detailed, comprehensive view of the data comparing the clinical utility of these modalities, and there is no consensus on the optimal algorithm for sensory and pain assessment in PNIs. We performed a systematic review of the literature focused on clinical data, evaluating pain and sensory assessment methods in peripheral nerves. We searched through multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Google Scholar, to identify studies that assessed assessment tools and explored their advantages and disadvantages. A total of 66 studies were selected that assessed various tools used to assess patient's pain and sensory recovery after a PNI. This review may serve as a guide to select the most appropriate assessment tools for monitoring nerve pain and/or sensory function both pre- and postoperatively. As the surgeons work to improve treatments for PNI and dysfunction, identifying the most appropriate existing measures of success and future directions for improved algorithms could lead to improved patient outcomes.

Identifying Oscillations under Multi-site Sensory Stimulation for High-level Peripheral Nerve Injured Patients：A Pilot Study

OBJECTIVE

For high-level peripheral nerve injured (PNI) patients with severe sensory dysfunction of upper extremities, identifying the multi-site tactile stimulation is of great importance to provide neurorehabilitation with sensory feedback. In this pilot study, we showed the feasibility of identifying multi-site and multi-intensity tactile stimulation in terms of electroencephalography (EEG).

APPROACH

Three high-level PNI patients and eight non-PNI participants were recruited in this study. Four different sites over the upper arm, forearm, thumb finger and little finger were randomly stimulated at two intensities (both sensory-level) based on the transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS). Meanwhile, 64-channel EEG signals were recorded during the passive tactile sense stimulation on each side.

MAIN RESULTS

The spatial-spectral distribution of brain oscillations underlying multi-site sensory stimulation showed dominant power attenuation over the somatosensory and prefrontal cortices in both alpha-band (8-12 Hz) and beta-band (13-30 Hz). But there was no significant difference among different stimulation sites in terms of the averaged power spectral density over the region of interest (ROI). By further identifying different stimulation sites using temporal-spectral features, we found the classification accuracies were all above 89% for the affected arm of PNI patients, comparable to that from their intact side and that from the non-PNI group. When the stimulation site-intensity combinations were treated as eight separate classes, the classification accuracies were ranging from 88.89% to 99.30% for the affected side of PNI subjects, similar to that from their non-affected side and that from the non-PNI group. Other performance metrics, including Specificity, Precision, and F1-Score, also showed a sound identification performance for both PNI patients and non-PNI subjects.

SIGNIFICANCE

These results suggest that reliable brain oscillations could be evoked and identified well, even though induced tactile sense could not be discerned by the PNI patients. This study have implication for facilitating bidirectional neurorehabilitation systems with sensory feedback.

Digital Nerve Reconstruction

Tension-free primary digital nerve repair may be unachievable in the presence of a nerve defect and require digital nerve reconstruction. Multiple techniques are available for reconstruction of a digital nerve defect using conduits, autograft, and allograft. Multiple comparison studies exist in the literature, suggesting similar results with autograft and allograft reconstruction, with several comparison studies suggesting inferior outcomes with conduit repair.

Sensory Neurotization of the Ulnar Nerve, Surgical Techniques and Functional Outcomes: A Review

When ulnar nerve lesions happen above the wrist level, sensation recovery after acute repair or nerve grafting is often challenging. Distal sensory nerve transfers may be an option for overcoming these sequelae. However, little data has been published on this topic. This study aims to review the surgical procedures currently proposed, along with their functional results. Six donor nerves have been described at the wrist level: the palmar branch of the median nerve, the cutaneous branch of the median nerve to the palm with or without fascicles of the ulnar digital nerve of the index finger, the posterior interosseous nerve, the third palmar digital nerve, the radial branch of the superficial radial nerve, the median nerve, and the fascicule for the third web space. Three donor nerves have been reported at the hand level: the ulnar digital nerves of the index, and the radial or ulnar digital nerves of the long finger. Three target sites were used: the superficial branch of the ulnar nerve, the dorsal branch of the ulnar nerve, and the ulnar digital branch of the fifth digit. All the technical points have been illustrated with anatomical dissection pictures. After assessing sensory recovery using the British Medical Research Council scale, a majority of excellent recoveries scaled S3+ or S4 have been reported in the targeted territory for each technique.

Surgical Treatment of Radial Nerve Injuries Associated With Humeral Shaft Fracture-A Single Center Experience

Radial nerve injuries are often associated with humeral shaft fractures. The results of treatment of these injuries, by contemporary surgical approaches, remain diverse. In this paper we presented the outcomes and analyzed the patient, clinical, and surgical procedure related characteristics and factors that may influence the outcome overall, in 77 patients treated at Clinic for Neurosurgery, Clinical Center of Serbia during a 20 years period. The nerve injuries were verified by US and EMNG. The majority of patients were treated by neurolysis or sural nerve grafting, while only few were treated by direct suture. The final recovery was evaluated by muscle strength assessment and classified using MRC. We analyzed extension of the wrist, extension of the fingers including the thumb, and abduction of the thumb. There was a significant statistical difference in MRC grade following the treatment. The total rate of useful functional recovery was achieved in 69 (89.61%) out of all studied patients, out of whom 20 (28.99%) achieved excellent recovery, 26 (37.68%) achieved good recovery and 23 (33.33%) achieved fair recovery. Only 8 (10.39%) out of all studied patients achieved poor recovery. The injured nerves, that were preserved in continuity, acquired by a low-energy trauma, and treated earlier than the 6 months were associated with better functional outcome following the surgery. In addition, there was a trend of better functional improvement with aging, keeping in mind that the old were subjected to lower energy trauma. The expectant management followed by surgery of radial nerve injury associated with humeral shaft fracture should be around 3 months, and the surgical nerve repair should not be performed later than the 6 months after injury. The energy of trauma may be a factor predicting patient's final recovery following the treatment.

Influence of surface peripheral electrical stimulation on nerve regeneration after digital nerve neurorrhaphy: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial

We will study the influence of low intensity and frequency surface peripheral electrical stimulation (PES) on nerve regeneration of digital nerve injuries of the hand after its surgical repair in humans. Participants will be patients with acute traumatic peripheral nerve injury referred to the Hand Surgery Service of the General Hospital of the State of Bahia, a reference service in the state. These patients will undergo surgery followed by PES in the immediate postoperative period. After hospital discharge, they will be followed up on an outpatient basis by researchers, who will remotely supervise a physiotherapy program. Our hypothesis is that PES will positively influence the recovery of sensory function in patients undergoing neurorrhaphy of digital nerves of the hand.

ReBEC registration:  U1111-1259-1998 (12/18/2020)

Injuries of the Peripheral Mandibular Nerve, Evaluation of Interventions and Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Trigeminal nerve injuries are common and there is currently no consensus on both timing and type of intervention to achieve the best outcomes. A systematic review was performed to compare the outcomes of the many different types of therapeutic interventions for nerve injury. PubMed, EBSCO, and Cochrane Review databases were used to search for studies published from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2019. Included studies detailed treatment of an injury to peripheral branches of the trigeminal nerve, either known transection or injury causing persistent alteration in sensation. The primary outcome was functional sensory recovery via the Medical Research Council scale. Twenty studies were included, detailing outcomes of 608 subjects undergoing intervention for 622 nerve injuries. Surgical interventions were able to achieve functional sensory recovery in approximately >80% or more of the subjects. There was heterogeneity among how procedures were performed, timing to intervention, and methods of measuring recovery. The data of this study supports the ability of surgical intervention to achieve functional sensory recovery in a significant number of subjects, and found evidence for better outcomes with intervention closer to the time of injury.

Bioluminescent Optogenetics: A Novel Experimental Therapy to Promote Axon Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury

Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is poor, mainly due to the slow and incomplete regeneration of injured axons. Experimental therapies that increase the excitability of the injured axons have proven remarkably successful in promoting regeneration, but their clinical applicability has been limited. Bioluminescent optogenetics (BL-OG) uses luminopsins, fusion proteins of light-generating luciferase and light-sensing ion channels that could be used to increase neuronal excitability if exposed to a suitable substrate. Excitatory luminopsins were expressed in motoneurons of transgenic mice and in wildtype mice transduced with adeno-associated viral vectors. Intraperitoneal administration of coelenterazine (CTZ), a known luciferase substrate, generated intense bioluminescence in peripheral axons. This bioluminescence increased motoneuron excitability. A single administration of CTZ immediately after sciatic nerve transection and repair markedly enhanced motor axon regeneration. Compound muscle action potentials were 3–4 times larger than controls by 4 weeks after injury. The results observed with transgenic mice were comparable to those of mice in which the luminopsin was expressed using viral vectors. Significantly more motoneurons had successfully reinnervated muscle targets four weeks after nerve injury in BL-OG treated mice than in controls. Bioluminescent optogenetics is a promising therapeutic approach to enhancing axon regeneration after PNI.

Nerve Reconstruction Using Processed Nerve Allograft in the U.S. Military

BACKGROUND

Processed nerve allograft (PNA) is an alternative to autograft for the reconstruction of peripheral nerves. We hypothesize that peripheral nerve repair with PNA in a military population will have a low rate of meaningful recovery (M ≥ 3) because of the frequency of blasting mechanisms and large zones of injury.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the military Registry of Avance Nerve Graft Evaluating Utilization and Outcomes for the Reconstruction of Peripheral Nerve Discontinuities database was conducted at the Walter Reed Peripheral Nerve Consortium. All adult active duty military patients who underwent any peripheral nerve repair with PNA for complete nerve injuries augmented with PNA visit were included. Motor strength and sensory function were reported as a consensus from the multidisciplinary Peripheral Nerve Consortium. Motor and sensory testing was conducted in accordance with the British Medical Research Council.

RESULTS

A total of 23 service members with 25 nerve injuries (3 sensory and 22 mixed motor/sensory) underwent reconstruction with PNA. The average age was 30 years and the majority were male (96%). The most common injury was to the sciatic nerve (28%) from a complex mechanism (gunshot, blast, compression, and avulsion). The average defect was 77 mm. Twenty-four percent of patients achieved a meaningful motor recovery. Longer follow-up was correlated with improved postoperative motor function (r = 0.49 and P = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

The military population had complex injuries with large nerve gaps. Despite the low rate of meaningful recovery (27.3%), large gaps in motor and mixed motor/sensory nerves are difficult to treat, and further research is needed to determine if autograft would achieve superior results.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, Level III.

Recovery of Sensation Over the Distribution of the Inferior Alveolar Nerve Following Mandibular Resection Without Nerve Reconstruction

PURPOSE

To assess the long-term recovery of sensation in the lower lip after mandibular resection without reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty patients who had mandibular resection carried out without reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve were examined after an interval ranging from 6 to 33 years.

RESULTS

Only 1 patient, seen 10 years after resection, was totally numb over the distribution of the inferior alveolar nerve. The other 29 patients had some return of sensation and many had a significant return, though it may take several years to reach the final result. Utilizing the MRC scale 70% of patients achieved S3 (return of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility without over response) CONCLUSION: This study can serve as a baseline for comparison with patients who have had mandibular resection with reconstruction of the inferior alveolar nerve to assess if this procedure improves the outcomes.

Lower Extremity Combat Sustained Peripheral Nerve Injury in US Military Personnel

Background:

Since the civil war, combat sustained peripheral nerve injuries (CSPNI) have been documented during wartime. Warfare has evolved and current combat involves a greater severity of blast injuries secondary to increased use of improvised explosive devices. The purpose of this study was to describe CSPNI and report outcomes after evaluation and treatment. We hypothesize that a shorter time to evaluation will improve outcomes.

Methods:

A database including all active duty service members who sustained a CSPNI and were treated by the PNC between 2004 and 2009 was used. Service member demographic information, injury mechanism, CSPNI description, and Medical Research Council (MRC) final motor and sensory outcomes were queried from this database.

Results:

One hundred and four military service members sustained 144 PNIs. The average age was 26.7 years, and nearly all were men (98.1%). There was no correlation between Sunderland classification and age, specific PNI, injury type, or time to evaluation. Higher Sunderland classifications were found to be correlated with worse final motor (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and final sensory (r = 0.41, P < 0.001) scores. Final motor and sensory scores were not associated with specific nerve injury, mechanism of injury, initial EMG, or surgical procedure. Shorter time to initial assessment was associated with improved final motor and sensory scores, but was not found to be statistically significant.

Conclusions:

As the complexity of CSPNIs progress as combat weaponry evolves, a firm understanding of treatment factors is important. Our study demonstrates in recent conflict that military service members’ initial injury severity is a key factor in expected outcome.

A Quantitative Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome Measure Use in Peripheral Nerve Injury of the Upper Limb

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) is common, leading to reduced function, pain, and psychological impact. Treatment has not progressed partly due to inability to compare outcomes between centers managing PNI. Numerous outcome measures exist but there is no consensus on which outcome measures to use nor when.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review in order to describe and classify outcome measures used in PNI.

METHODS

A search of Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED), and CENTRAL (Cochrane Clinical Trials) was conducted. Randomized control trials (RCTs), cohort studies, and case-controlled and case series (≥5 participants) published from inception of the database until 2019 investigating adult patients with a traumatic upper limb PNI in which an outcome measurement was utilized were included.

RESULTS

A total of 96 studies were included (15 RCTs, 8 case-control studies, 18 cohort studies, 5 observational studies, and the remainder were case series or retrospective reviews). A total of 56 individual outcome measures were identified, utilized across 28 different countries and 7097 patients. Ten core domains were defined: sensory subjective, sensory objective, motor subjective, motor objective, sensorimotor function, psychology and well-being, disability, quality of life, pain and discomfort, and neurotrophic measures.

CONCLUSION

Lack of consensus on outcome measure use hinders comparison of outcomes between nerve injury centers and the development of novel treatments. Development of a core outcome set will help standardize outcome reporting, improve translation of novel treatments from lab to clinical practice, and ensure future research in PNI is more amenable to systematic review and meta-analysis.

Understanding and Measuring Long-Term Outcomes of Fingertip and Nail Bed Injuries and Treatments

There are many outcome measures to choose from when caring for or studying fingertip and nail bed trauma and treatments. This article outlines general outcome measures principles as well as guidelines on choosing, implementing, and interpreting specific tools for these injuries. It also presents recent results from the literature for many of these measures, which can help learners, educators, and researchers by providing a clinical knowledge base and aiding study design.

Combat-Sustained Peripheral Nerve Injuries in the United States Military

PURPOSE

Combat-sustained peripheral nerve injuries (CSPNIs) are often the result of high-energy blast mechanisms and are increasing in frequency and severity among US forces engaged in contemporary warfare. The purpose of this study was to describe CSPNIs and report outcomes after evaluation in a military multidisciplinary peripheral nerve clinic. We hypothesized that a shorter time to evaluation by a multidisciplinary peripheral nerve team would improve outcomes.

METHODS

The Peripheral Nerve Consortium (PNC) maintains an electronic database of all active duty service members who sustained a peripheral nerve injury (PNI) and were treated by the PNC between 2004 and 2009. This database was queried for service member demographic information, injury characteristics, wounding patterns, CSPNI description, surgical procedures, and Medical Research Council final motor and sensory outcome.

RESULTS

Among the 104 service members treated by the PNC in the 6-year period reviewed, there were 138 PNIs. Average age was 27 years, time to initial evaluation by the PNC was 4 (±7) months, and average follow-up was 18 (±18) months. Associated injuries included fractures (31.1%), multiple PNIs (76.8%), vascular injury (30.4%), and traumatic brain injury (34.1%). There was no association between Sunderland classification and time to evaluation, mechanism of injury, or nerve injured. However, Sunderland classification was correlated with final motor and final sensory scores. Service members with better final sensory score (S1 or S2) had shorter time to initial evaluation than did patients with a final sensory score of S0 (<0.05). This did not hold true for final motor score.

CONCLUSIONS

Service members with more severe initial injuries had worse final outcomes. Although timely referral does not occur for most CSPNIs, a shorter time to presentation also led to improved sensory recovery. Complex combat-sustained PNIs may be best understood and treated within a multidisciplinary team.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic IV.

A Multicenter Matched Cohort Study of Processed Nerve Allograft and Conduit in Digital Nerve Reconstruction

PURPOSE

Biomaterials used to restore digital nerve continuity after injury associated with a defect may influence ultimate outcomes. An evaluation of matched cohorts undergoing digital nerve gap reconstruction was conducted to compare processed nerve allograft (PNA) and conduits. Based on scientific evidence and historical controls, we hypothesized that outcomes of PNA would be better than for conduit reconstruction.

METHODS

We identified matched cohorts based on patient characteristics, medical history, mechanism of injury, and time to repair for digital nerve injuries with gaps up to 25 mm. Data were stratified into 2 gap length groups: short gaps of 14 mm or less and long gaps of 15 to 25 mm. Meaningful sensory recovery was defined as a Medical Research Council scale of S3 or greater. Comparisons of meaningful recovery were made by repair method between and across the gap length groups.

RESULTS

Eight institutions contributed matched data sets for 110 subjects with 162 injuries. Outcomes data were available in 113 PNA and 49 conduit repairs. Meaningful recovery was reported in 61% of the conduit group, compared with 88% in the PNA group. In the group with a 14-mm or less gap, conduit and PNA outcomes were 67% and 92% meaningful recovery, respectively. In the 15- to 25-mm gap length group, conduit and PNA outcomes were 45% and 85% meaningful recovery, respectively. There were no reported adverse events in either treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of digital nerve reconstruction in this study using PNA were consistent and significantly better than those of conduits across all groups. As gap lengths increased, the proportion of patients in the conduit group with meaningful recovery decreased. This study supports the use of PNA for nerve gap reconstruction in digital nerve reconstructions up to 25 mm.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic III.

Subterminal key pinch dynamometry: a new method to quantify strength deficit in ulnar nerve paralysis

Precise pre- and postoperative assessments are fundamental to recording the quality of recovery after ulnar nerve repair. Because of its imprecision, manual muscle testing is being replaced by dynamometry to measure grasping and key-pinch strengths. However, both grasping and key pinch are dependent not only on the ulnar nerve but also the median and radial nerves. We propose to measure strength using a new sort of pinch, called the 'subterminal key pinch'. Strength was measured using a commercially available pinch meter. Patients applied pressure on the dynamometer with the interphalangeal joint of the thumb, maintaining the joint in extension to avoid enhancement of strength by the flexor pollicis longus. We examined 17 patients before ulnar nerve repair. Preoperatively, grasping strength was 46% of normal, while key pinch was 58%, pinch-to-zoom strength was 26% and subterminal key pinch only 7%. Subterminal key pinch was the most affected pinch with a strength deficit of over 90%.Level of evidence: IV.

A Nanofiber Sheet Incorporating Vitamin B12 Promotes Nerve Regeneration in a Rat Neurorrhaphy Model

Outcomes of peripheral nerve repair after injury are often suboptimal. Therefore, developing biological approaches to augment nerve regeneration is important. In this in vivo study, we tested the hypothesis that augmentation with an electrospun nanofiber sheet incorporating methylcobalamin (MeCbl) would be effective for regeneration after peripheral nerve transection and repair.

Methods

Rats were divided into 3 groups that either underwent sciatic nerve repair with or without the MeCbl sheet, or a sham operation. At 4 and/or 8 weeks after the operation, sensory and motor functional recovery, along with histological findings, were compared among the groups using the toe-spreading test, mechanical and thermal algesimetry tests, tibialis anterior muscle weight measurements, electrophysiological analyses, which included nerve conduction velocity (NCV), compound muscle action potential (CMAP), and terminal latency (TL), and histological analyses involving the myelinated axon ratio, axon diameter, and total axon number.

Results

Compared with the repair group without the MeCbl sheet, the repair group with the MeCbl sheet showed significant recovery in terms of tibialis anterior muscle weight, NCV and CMAP, and also tended to improve in the toe-spreading test, mechanical and thermal algesimetry tests, and TL. Histological analyses also demonstrated that the myelinated axon ratios and axon diameters were significantly higher. Among these findings, the repair group with the MeCbl sheet demonstrated the same recovery in NCV as the sham group.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that electrospun nanofiber MeCbl sheets promoted nerve regeneration and functional recovery, indicating that this treatment strategy may be viable for human peripheral nerve injuries.

Advances in the repair of segmental nerve injuries and trends in reconstruction

Despite advances in surgery, the reconstruction of segmental nerve injuries continues to pose challenges. In this review, current neurobiology regarding regeneration across a nerve defect is discussed in detail. Recent findings include the complex roles of nonneuronal cells in nerve defect regeneration, such as the role of the innate immune system in angiogenesis and how Schwann cells migrate within the defect. Clinically, the repair of nerve defects is still best served by using nerve autografts with the exception of small, noncritical sensory nerve defects, which can be repaired using autograft alternatives, such as processed or acellular nerve allografts. Given current clinical limits for when alternatives can be used, advanced solutions to repair nerve defects demonstrated in animals are highlighted. These highlights include alternatives designed with novel topology and materials, delivery of drugs specifically known to accelerate axon growth, and greater attention to the role of the immune system.

Long-Term Outcomes of Digital Nerve Repair Accompanied by Digital Artery Injury in Flexor Zone 2

Objectives  Better healing results of any tissue or area is closely linked with a well-blood supply in reconstructive surgery. Peripheric nerve healing is closely related to blood supply as well. We aimed to assess whether there was any difference between digital nerve healing with and without extrinsic blood supply.

Methods  We assessed 48 patients with unilateral digital nerve injury at zone 2. Twenty-four of them had unrepairable arterial injury and other 24 had no arterial injury. The 24 patients in the “unrepaired artery group” (UA) and 24 patients in the “intact artery group” (IA) were compared.

Results  Mean follow-up time was 17.7 months. The mean two-point discrimination (2PD) was 5.29 mm in IA group and 5.37 mm in UA group. One neuroma in IA group and two neuromas in UA group were determined. We found no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of neuroma, 2PD, and cold intolerance. The results of British Medical Research Council sensory recovery clinical scale were comparable for these two groups.

Conclusion  Digital nerve healing is related to numerous factors. We hypothesized that blood flow may be one of these factors; however, at this zone digital artery repair is not the foremost determinant for digital nerve healing. Further researches should be done for upper injury levels. Despite this result, we argue not to leave the digital artery without repairment and we propose to repair both artery and nerve to achieve the normal anatomical integrity and to warrant finger blood flow in possible future injuries.

Enhancing the Outcome of Traumatic Sensory Nerve Lesions of the Hand by Additional Use of a Chitosan Nerve Tube in Primary Nerve Repair: A Randomized Controlled Bicentric Trial

BACKGROUND

Peripheral sensory nerve injuries present a significant yet common challenge in acute hand trauma surgery. Standard treatment remains microsurgical end-to-end nerve repair where appropriate. Permanent loss of sensitivity and painful neuroma formation are typical sequelae of unsuccessful surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the additional use of a chitosan nerve tube in primary nerve repair positively influences sensory recovery.

METHODS

A randomized, controlled, two-center trial with parallel group design and double-blind assessment was conducted to demonstrate the superiority of the additional use of a chitosan nerve tube compared with microsurgical nerve repair alone. Seventy-four participants were enrolled. The primary outcome parameter used was degree of static two-point discrimination at 6 months after surgery. Additional secondary outcome parameters included filament recognition testing (Semmes-Weinstein); pain; neuroma development; and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score.

RESULTS

Nerve repair with additional use of chitosan nerve tubes (intervention group) significantly increased both tactile gnosis (expressed by two-point discrimination) and sensitivity (expressed by Semmes-Weinstein testing). The mean two-point discrimination at 6-month follow-up was 8 mm (range, 2 to 20 mm) in the control group and 6.3 mm (range, 1 to 15 mm) in the intervention group, respectively (p = 0.029). Two-point discrimination correlated with the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. In the control and intervention groups, respectively, three versus zero neuromas were found.

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral sensory nerve regeneration can be improved significantly by additional use of a chitosan nerve tube. An improved ability of static two-point discrimination is clinically relevant.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, I.

Development and validation of a new patient-reported outcome measure for peripheral nerve disorders of the hand, the I-HaND© Scale

Following guidelines from the Patient-Centred Outcomes Research Institute and using a mixed methods study, a new patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) for both nerve trauma and compression affecting the hand, the Impact of a Hand Nerve Disorders (I-HaND) Scale, was developed. Face-to-face interviews with 14 patients and subsequent pilot-testing with 61 patients resulted in the development of the 32-item PROM. A longitudinal validation study with 82 patients assessed the psychometric properties of the I-HaND. Content and construct validity was confirmed by cognitive interviews with patients and through principal component analysis. The I-HaND has high internal consistency (α = 0.98) and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97). Responsiveness statistics showed that the I-HaND can detect change over 3 months and discriminate between improvers and non-improvers. We conclude that the I-HaND can be used as a PROM for people with a range of hand nerve disorders.

Reconstruction of a 10-mm-long median nerve gap in an ischemic environment using autologous conduits with different patterns of blood supply: A comparative study in the rat

The aim of this study was to evaluate in the Wistar rat the efficacy of various autologous nerve conduits with various forms of blood supply in reconstructing a 10-mm-long gap in the median nerve (MN) under conditions of local ischemia. A 10-mm-long median nerve defect was created in the right arm. A loose silicone tube was placed around the nerve gap zone, in order to simulate a local ischemic environment. Rats were divided in the following experimental groups (each with 20 rats): the nerve Graft (NG) group, in which the excised MN segment was reattached; the conventional nerve flap (CNF) and the arterialized neurovenous flap (ANVF) groups in which the gap was bridged with homonymous median nerve flaps; the prefabricated nerve flap (PNF) group in which the gap was reconstructed with a fabricated flap created by leaving an arteriovenous fistula in contact with the sciatic nerve for 5 weeks; and the two control groups, Sham and Excision groups. In the latter group, the proximal stump of the MN nerve was ligated and no repair was performed. The rats were followed for 100 days. During this time, they did physiotherapy. Functional, electroneuromyographic and histological studies were performed. The CNF and ANVF groups presented better results than the NG group in the following assessments: grasping test, nociception, motor stimulation threshold, muscle weight, and histomorphometric evaluation. Radial deviation of the operated forepaw was more common in rats that presented worse results in the other outcome variables. Overall, CNFs and ANVFs produced a faster and more complete recovery than NGs in the reconstruction of a 10-mm-long median nerve gap in an ischemic environment in the Wistar rat. Although, results obtained with CNFs were in most cases were better than ANVFs, these differences were not statistically significant for most of the outcome variables.