A narrative review of healthcare financing and reimbursement of nutritional support for patients in Singapore

The Clinical and Cost-Effectiveness of an Individualized Nutritional CAre (INCA) Bundle versus Standard Care for Adults with Pressure Injuries Receiving Home Nursing Services: A Protocol for a Cluster Randomized and Pragmatic Clinical Trial with an Economic Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Pressure injuries (PIs) represent a significant healthcare challenge in Singapore among the aging population. These injuries contribute to increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare expenditure. Existing research predominantly explores single-component interventions in hospital environments, often yielding limited success. The INCA Trial aims to address this research gap by conducting a comprehensive, cluster randomized controlled trial that integrates education, individualized nutritional support, and community nursing care. This study is designed to evaluate clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes, focusing on PI wound area reduction and incremental costs associated with the intervention.

METHODS

The INCA Trial employs a two-group, non-blinded, cluster randomized, and pragmatic clinical trial design, recruiting 380 adult individuals (age ≥ 21 years) living in the community with stage II, III, IV, and unstageable PI(s) who are receiving home nursing service in Singapore. Cluster randomization is stratified by postal codes to minimize treatment contamination. The intervention arm will receive an individualized nutrition and nursing care bundle (dietary education with nutritional supplementation), while the control arm will receive standard care. The 90-day intervention will be followed by outcome assessments extending over one year. Primary outcomes include changes in PI wound area and the proportion of participants achieving a ≥40% area reduction. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life (HRQOL), nutritional status, and hospitalization rates. Data analysis will be conducted on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis, supplemented by interim analyses for efficacy and futility and pre-specified sensitivity and subgroup analyses. The primary outcome for the cost-effectiveness analysis will be based on the change to total costs compared to the change to health benefits, as measured by quality-adjusted life years (QALYs).

DISCUSSION

The INCA Trial serves as a pioneering effort in its approach to PI management in community settings. This study uniquely emphasizes both clinical and economic outcomes and melds education, intensive dietetic support, and community nursing care for a holistic approach to enhancing PI management.

Spillover Effects of COVID-19 on Essential Chronic Care and Ways to Foster Health System Resilience to Support Vulnerable Non-COVID Patients: A Multistakeholder Study

OBJECTIVES

Little empirical research exists on how key stakeholders involved in the provision of care for chronic conditions and policy planning perceive the indirect or "spillover" effects of the COVID-19 on non-COVID patients. This study aims to explore stakeholder experiences and perspectives of the impact of COVID-19 on the provision of care for chronic conditions, evolving modalities of care, and stakeholder suggestions for improving health system resilience to prepare for future pandemics.

DESIGN

Qualitative study design.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This study was conducted during and after the COVID-19 lockdown period in Singapore. We recruited a purposive sample of 51 stakeholders involved in care of non-COVID patients and/or policy planning for chronic disease management. They included health care professionals (micro-level), hospital management officers (meso-level), and government officials (macro-level).

METHODS

In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted. All interviews were digitally recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed.

RESULTS

Optimal provision of care for chronic diseases may be compromised through the following processes: lack of "direct" communication between colleagues on clinical cases resulting in rescheduling of patient visits; uncertainty in diagnostic decisions due to protocol revision and lab closure; and limited preparedness to handle non-COVID patients' emotional reactions. Although various digital innovations enhanced access to care, a digital divide exists due to uneven digital literacy and perceived data security risks, thereby hampering wider implementation. To build health system resilience, stakeholders suggested the need to integrate digital care into the information technology ecosystem, develop strategic public-private partnerships for chronic disease management, and give equal attention to the provision of holistic psychosocial and community support for vulnerable non-COVID patients.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Findings highlight that strategies to deliver quality chronic care for non-COVID patients in times of public health crisis should include innovative care practices and institutional reconfiguration within the broader health system context.

Medical Nutrition Reimbursement in Singapore: Who Are the Patients Receiving MediFund Assistance? An Audit of Clinical Outcomes and Issues Pertaining to Reimbursement in a Public Hospital in Singapore

BACKGROUND

Financial reimbursement (MediFund) of medical nutrition products (MNPs) was recently implemented in some of the public hospitals in Singapore for patients with financial difficulties. This study aimed to investigate the sustainability of this policy and the benefits conferred.

METHODS

We performed a 1-year retrospective audit of patients in a tertiary hospital who received MediFund. Demographics, presupport and postsupport clinical outcomes, and cost of support were determined and analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 129 patients received MediFund for MNPs. The median length of financial support was 115 days (interquartile range, 37-269). Overall, body mass index increased after nutrition support (20.9 ± 5.1 vs 20.4 ± 5.3; P = .012). There was a significant decrease in the number of malnourished patients (final, 55.1% vs initial, 86.8%; P < .001) and a significant increase in 7-point subjective global assessment scores (final, 4.9 ± 1.3 vs initial, 4.1 ± 1.3; P < .001) after MNP support. MNP adherence was high for 88.5% of patients who returned for follow-up appointments. Patients who defaulted follow-up appointments were more likely to have 30-day readmission (50% vs 19.5%; P < .001) and had higher mortality rates (35.7% vs 10.3%; P < .001). Total reimbursement of S $108,960 was provided to subsidize MNPs over 1 year.

CONCLUSION

Supporting patients with financial difficulties led to an improvement in their nutrition status. Regular dietitian reviews of patients and monitoring compliance to consumption of MNPs are essential to ensure patients benefit from the support.