Advantages of C2 Monitoring to Avoid Acute Rejection in Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients

Could Salivary Cyclosporine Dosage Replace the Whole Blood Cyclosporine Measurements in Renal Transplant Patients?

Background:

Cyclosporin (CsA) has been extensively used as the immunosuppressant of choice in renal transplantation. Currently available approaches to assess CsA levels, both in serum and blood, fail to accurately reflect the concentration of the pharmacologically active drug fraction. Free CsA levels in biological fluids (blood or saliva) have been advocated to play an important role. Traditional salivary CsA monitoring tests are based on available archaic salivary techniques that are nonspecific and require large amounts of saliva. The aim of this study was to assess salivary CsA correlation using a novel and more accurate technique and to correlate with CsA levels in blood.

Material and Methods:

Patients provided blood samples of 2 ml and 2 ml of unstimulated saliva on the same day 2 h after the morning CsA dose (C₂). Whole blood levels of CsA were determined using the monoclonal fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA) kit. The FPIA kit was adapted to salivary testing by using a novel extraction method developed and patented under the name of Middle East Research Institute (MERI). Wilcoxon signed rank test compared the differences in blood and salivary CsA. Pearson's correlation coefficient assessed the linear association between blood and salivary CsA concentrations. All analyses were performed using IBM-SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA).

Results:

No significant correlation was observed between blood and salivary CsA levels.

Conclusion:

Salivary CsA concentrations at C₂ cannot adequately replace C₂ blood levels as an indicator of CsA bioavailability despite improved performance of monoclonal FPIA and application of the MERI technique. More studies may be warranted to design more reliable and less invasive procedures for therapeutic drug monitoring.

Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose Cyclosporine with Everolimus and Steroids in de novo Heart Transplant Patients: A Multicentre, Randomized Trial

A six-month, multicenter, randomized, open-label study was undertaken to determine whether renal function is improved using reduced-exposure cyclosporine (CsA) versus standard-exposure CsA in 199 de novo heart transplant patients receiving everolimus and steroids ± induction therapy. Mean C(2) levels were at the low end of the target range in standard-exposure patients (n = 100) and exceeded target range in reduced-exposure patients (n = 99) throughout the study. Mean serum creatinine at Month 6 (the primary endpoint) was 141.0 ± 53.1 μmol/L in standard-exposure patients versus 130.1 ± 53.7 μmol/L in reduced-exposure patients (P = 0.093). The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection ≥3A at Month 6 was 21.0% (21/100) in the standard-exposure group and 16.2% (16/99) in the reduced-exposure group (n.s.). Adverse events and infections were similar between treatment groups. Thus, everolimus with reduced-exposure CsA resulted in comparable efficacy compared to standard-exposure CsA. No renal function benefits were demonstrated; that is possibly related to poor adherence to reduced CsA exposure.

Strategies to prevent cellular rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

Despite more than 40 years' experience in pediatric heart transplantation, cellular rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. In this review, strategies and agents to prevent acute cellular rejection are discussed. Strategies to prevent rejection are divided into two phases - induction and maintenance therapies. Currently, the most commonly used induction agents are polyclonal antibodies (rabbit or equine antithymocyte globulin) and interleukin-2 receptor antibodies (daclizumab or basiliximab). Induction therapies have reduced early rejection, are renal sparing, and can reduce corticosteroid exposure, but have not yet been shown to have a longer term survival benefit. Multiple maintenance immunosuppressants are available. Nearly all regimens include a calcineurin inhibitor (either ciclosporin [cyclosporine] or tacrolimus). Most combinations in pediatric heart transplantation include an antiproliferative agent (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or, less commonly, sirolimus). Everolimus has seen increasing use in adult heart transplant patients in Europe but, to date, its use is rare in pediatric heart transplantation. The use of corticosteroids as a third agent is still common, but strategies to avoid or minimize their use are increasing. The 'best' combination of therapies varies between studies. By gaining a better understanding of individuals' genetic and environmental risk factors, we may in the future be able to better predict the course of cardiac allografts and enhance our ability to tailor immunosuppression to individual patient variables with the ultimate goal of inducing a state of immune tolerance.

Potential of dried blood self-sampling for cyclosporine c(2) monitoring in transplant outpatients

Background. Close therapeutic drug monitoring of Cyclosporine (CsA) in transplant outpatients is a favourable procedure to maintain the long-term blood drug levels within their respective narrow therapeutic ranges. Compared to basal levels (C₀), CsA peak levels (C₂) are more predictive for transplant rejection. However, the application of C₂ levels is hampered by the precise time of blood sampling and the need of qualified personnel. Therefore, we evaluated a new C₂ self-obtained blood sampling in transplant outpatients using dried capillary and venous blood samples and compared the CsA levels, stability, and clinical practicability of the different procedures. Methods. 55 solid organ transplant recipients were instructed to use single-handed sampling of each 50 μL capillary blood and dried blood spots by finger prick using standard finger prick devices. We used standardized EDTA-coated capillary blood collection systems and standardized filter paper WS 903. CsA was determined by LC-MS/MS. The patients and technicians also answered a questionnaire on the procedure and sample quality. Results. The C₀ and C₂ levels from capillary blood collection systems (C₀ [ng/mL]: 114.5 ± 44.5; C₂: 578.2 ± 222.2) and capillary dried blood (C₀ [ng/mL]: 175.4 ± 137.7; C₂: 743.1 ± 368.1) significantly (P < .01) correlated with the drug levels of the venous blood samples (C₀ [ng/mL]: 97.8 ± 37.4; C₂: 511.2 ± 201.5). The correlation at C₀ was ρ_cap.-ven. = 0.749, and ρ_{dried blood-ven} = 0.432; at C₂: ρ_cap.-ven. = 0.861 and ρ_{dried blood-ven} = 0.711. The patients preferred the dried blood sampling because of the more simple and less painful procedure. Additionally, the sample quality of self-obtained dried blood spots for LC-MS/MS analytics was superior to the respective capillary blood samples. Conclusions. C₂ self-obtained dried blood sampling can easily be performed by transplant outpatients and is therefore suitable and cost-effective for close therapeutic drug monitoring.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part II

Part I of this article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, reviewed calcineurin inhibitors--ciclosporin and tacrolimus. In part II, we review the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors--sirolimus and everolimus--in thoracic transplantation, and we provide an overall discussion and suggest various areas for future study.

Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study

BACKGROUND

Cyclosporine (CsA) absorption varies early after transplantation and can be accurately assessed by the area under the absorption curve (AUC). The 2-hour post-dose (C2) level of CsA in whole blood is reported to be a useful surrogate marker of CsA AUC in kidney and liver transplant monitoring, but should be further explored in thoracic organ recipients.

METHODS

In a 12-month study we included de novo lung (n = 95) and heart (n = 96) recipients. All participants received cyclosporine (Sandimmun Neoral) monitored by C0 and blood was collected for analysis of C2 retrospectively. Abbreviated AUC (AUC(0-4)) was measured at 7 days and 3 months. Primary outcome was C2 relation to the frequency of acute cellular rejection (ACR) needing treatment and possible decline in measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR). Recipients were divided into lower, middle and upper third C2 groups based on 2-week post-operative values (tertiles T1 to T3).

RESULTS

C2 was the most robust substitute for AUC(0-4) in the group of patients studied. For lung, but not heart, recipients there were differences in mean number of ACRs (p = 0.05), incidence of any rejections (p = 0.04), mean number of any rejections (p = 0.001) and time to first rejection (p = 0.03) between T1 and T3. C2 did not predict reduction in mGFR.

CONCLUSIONS

C2 is a sensitive predictor for ACR in lung, but not heart, recipients, C2 was not predictive of a decline in mGFR. This study suggests that management of lung recipients by C2 may diminish the number of ACRs.

Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I

Although immunosuppressive treatments and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) have significantly contributed to the increased success of thoracic transplantation, there is currently no consensus on the best immunosuppressive strategies. Maintenance therapy typically consists of a triple-drug regimen including corticosteroids, a calcineurin inhibitor (ciclosporin or tacrolimus) and either a purine synthesis antagonist (mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine) or a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (sirolimus or everolimus). The incidence of acute and chronic rejection and of mortality after thoracic transplantation is still high compared with other types of solid organ transplantation. The high allogenicity and immunogenicity of the lungs justify the use of higher doses of immunosuppressants, putting lung transplant recipients at a higher risk of drug-induced toxicities. All immunosuppressants are characterized by large intra- and interindividual variability of their pharmacokinetics and by a narrow therapeutic index. It is essential to know their pharmacokinetic properties and to use them for treatment individualization through TDM in order to improve the treatment outcome. Unlike the kidneys and the liver, the heart and the lungs are not directly involved in drug metabolism and elimination, which may be the cause of pharmacokinetic differences between patients from all of these transplant groups. TDM is mandatory for most immunosuppressants and has become an integral part of immunosuppressive drug therapy. It is usually based on trough concentration (C(0)) monitoring, but other TDM tools include the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) over the (12-hour) dosage interval or the AUC over the first 4 hours post-dose, as well as other single concentration-time points such as the concentration at 2 hours. Given the peculiarities of thoracic transplantation, a review of the pharmacokinetics and TDM of the main immunosuppressants used in thoracic transplantation is presented in this article. Even more so than in other solid organ transplant populations, their pharmacokinetics are characterized by wide intra- and interindividual variability in thoracic transplant recipients. The pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin in heart and lung transplant recipients have been explored in a number of studies, but less is known about the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in these populations, and there are hardly any studies on the pharmacokinetics of sirolimus and everolimus. Given the increased use of these molecules in thoracic transplant recipients, their pharmacokinetics deserve to be explored in depth. There are very few data, some of which are conflicting, on the practices and outcomes of TDM of immunosuppressants after thoracic transplantation. The development of sophisticated TDM tools dedicated to thoracic transplantation are awaited in order to accurately evaluate the patients' exposure to drugs in general and, in particular, to immunosuppressants. Finally, large cohort TDM studies need to be conducted in thoracic transplant patients in order to identify the most predictive exposure indices and their target values, and to validate the clinical usefulness of improved TDM in these conditions. In part I of the article, we review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of calcineurin inhibitors. In part II, we will review the pharmacokinetics and TDM of mycophenolate and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and provide an overall discussion along with perspectives.

Assessment of the Cylex ImmuKnow cell function assay in pediatric heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The Cylex ImmuKnow (Cylex, Columbia, MD) cell function assay (CICFA) is a commercially available test of immune response that purportedly identifies solid organ transplant patients at risk for either acute rejection (AR) or infection. Data on the utility of this test in pediatric heart transplant patients are very limited. This study tested the hypothesis that CICFA is a clinically useful test in this transplant population.

METHODS

All children undergoing heart transplantation at the study center (1989-2006) for whom CICFA levels were obtained were reviewed. The association of CICFA levels with episodes of AR and significant infections was determined.

RESULTS

Among 83 patients (34 girls, 41%), 367 CICFA levels were obtained (median, 4.0; interquartile range [IQR], 2.0-6.0 per patient). There were 26 episodes of AR in 17 patients (20%) and 38 infections in 34 patients (41%). CICFA levels were similar among patients with AR at the time of the CICFA measurement (median, 325 [IQR, 163-480] adenosine triphosphate [ATP] ng/ml) vs patients without AR (median, 330 [IQR, 227-441] ATP ng/ml; p = 0.36). CICFA levels were similar among patients with infections within 1 month of CICFA measurement (median, 295 [IQR, 216-366] ATP ng/ml) and those without infections (median, 330 [IQR, 226-453] ATP ng/ml; p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

The CICFA is not predictive of AR or significant infections in pediatric heart transplant patients. On the basis of the available evidence, this assay cannot be recommended as part of the routine management of pediatric heart transplant patients.

Pharmacodynamic cyclosporine A-monitoring: relation of gene expression in lymphocytes to cyclosporine blood levels in cardiac allograft recipients

Recently, we established a pharmacodynamic assay to monitor immunosuppressive effectiveness of cyclosporine A (CsA) in patients on standard CsA regimen. The aim of the present study was to extend this correlation to reduced CsA regimen and to compare pharmacodynamic and kinetic parameters to allow prediction of rejections and infections. In 53 heart allograft recipients, nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT)-regulated gene expression was quantified at trough (C0) and 2-h post-CsA dose (C2). Gene expression at C2 was calculated relative to C0 (residual gene expression, RGE) or relative to a healthy reference group (absolute gene expression, AGE). RGE correlated with CsA C2-levels in bimodal fashion: above 575 ng/ml correlation was seen with flat regression gradient. Below 575 ng/ml, correlation was excellent with markedly steeper gradient. At C0 in the low-C2 group (<575 ng/ml), AGE remained unchanged, whereas in the high-C2 group (>575 ng/ml) AGE was markedly reduced. In both groups, AGE at C2 was strongly inhibited. In patients contracting infection during follow-up, RGE was lower than in those without infections independent of CsA levels. CsA-monitoring by quantitation of NFAT-regulated gene expression is feasible with standard and reduced CsA regimens. It correlates better with the incidence of infections than measurement of CsA concentrations and might help in avoiding over-immunosuppression.

Posttransplant monitoring of pediatric lung transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews current trends in pediatric lung posttransplant management, reveals pitfalls that exist, and introduces additional parameters that may have an impact on long-term survival.

RECENT FINDINGS

A number of parameters are monitored after transplantation to prevent or identify early complications related to lung transplantation in hope of reducing morbidity and mortality. These include routine laboratory studies, imaging, and monitoring of drug levels and lung function. Drug monitoring allows individualization of a patient's immunosuppressive therapy; however, drug levels alone may not reflect the patient's immune status. ImmuKnow is a general immune-monitoring assay that may help guide therapy. Two major complications are rejection and infection, and bronchoscopy is used to differentiate these two entities. Silent rejection may occur and increase the chance of developing bronchiolitis obliterans; therefore, many centers perform surveillance bronchoscopies. Recently, de-novo anti-histocompatibility locus antigen antibodies and gastroesophageal reflux have been associated with poor outcomes, and many centers are monitoring these entities as part of care following lung transplant.

SUMMARY

There has been little improvement in long-term outcomes of lung transplantation. Current monitoring methods are utilized to maintain or improve outcomes and recently additional monitoring parameters have been identified which hopefully will improve long-term outcomes.