Treatment of Hypercholesterolemia With Ezetimibe in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

Management of dyslipidemia in adult solid organ transplant recipients

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) has revolutionized treatment of end-stage disease. Improvements in the SOT continuum of care have unmasked a significant burden of cardiovascular disease, manifesting as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Although several risk factors for development of post-transplant cardiovascular disease exist, dyslipidemia remains one of the most frequent and modifiable risks. An important contributor to dyslipidemia in SOT recipients is the off-target metabolic effects of immunosuppressive medications, which may alter lipoproteins and their metabolism. Dyslipidemia management is paramount as lipid-lowering therapy with statins has demonstrated reductions in graft vasculopathy, decreased rejection rates, and improved survival. Several nonstatin medication options are available, but data supporting their benefit in the SOT population are minimal, typically extrapolated from studies in the general population. Further compounding dyslipidemia management is the complex interplay of drug interactions between lipid-lowering and immunosuppressant medications, which can result in serious toxicity and/or therapeutic failure.

Neuromuscular diseases after cardiac transplantation

BACKGROUND

Cardiac transplantation is a therapeutic option in end-stage heart failure. Peripheral nervous system (PNS) disease is known to occur in cardiac transplant recipients but has not been fully characterized.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort review reports the PNS-related concerns of 313 cardiac transplant recipients (28% women, 8% children) over an 18-year period at a single institution.

RESULTS

Thirty percent of patients (95 of 313) reported a PNS-related concern in the post-transplant period, but only 5% had a concern in the first 6 weeks after transplant. The relative frequency of PNS-related complaints was as follows: polyneuropathy, 33%; muscle disease, 26%; mononeuropathy, 17%; radiculopathy, 13%; small-fiber polyneuropathy, 4%; plexopathy, 3%; and other (e.g., herpes zoster), 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Etiology of these concerns can be divided into four broad categories: (1) immediate post-operative complications (e.g., brachial plexus stretch injury); (2) concerns related to the underlying disease prompting transplantation (e.g., polyneuropathy secondary to amyloidosis); (3) concerns related to necessary medications (e.g., steroid-associated myopathy); and (4) concerns reflective of aging in a post-transplant population with enhanced survival (e.g., degenerative joint disease-related radiculopathy).

Impact of ezetimibe on cholesterol subfractions in dyslipidemic cardiac transplant recipients receiving statin therapy

BACKGROUND

Ezetimibe decreases cholesterol in cardiac transplant recipients intolerant to statins therapy. The effects of ezetimibe in addition to statins therapy and its relationship with the magnitude of dyslipidemia and statins utilization have not been studied in cardiac transplant recipients.

METHODS

The design of this investigation was a retrospective case control study. Twenty-two patients receiving the combination of therapy of statins plus ezetimibe were compared with 43 patients treated with statins only. The endpoints were assessed after three months of follow-up.

RESULTS

The addition of ezetimibe decreased low density lipoprotein-cholesterol by 25% compared with a 4% increase in patients receiving statins only. The impact of ezetimibe was similar regardless of the magnitude of dyslipidemia or statins dosage. Ezetimibe increase high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol only in patients with baseline HDL-cholesterol above 1.3 mM/L (p < 0.05). There was an asymptomatic, but significant increase in creatinine kinase level [+31.4 +/- 8.1 (ezetimibe) vs. + 1.5 +/- 5.0 mM/L (placebo); p = 0.005].

CONCLUSION

Ezetimibe therapy provides a significant reduction in most cholesterol subfractions regardless of the magnitude of dyslipidemia and statins dosage.

The efficacy and safety of ezetimibe for treatment of dyslipidemia after heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Statins, although the treatment of choice for dyslipidemia after heart transplantation (HT), are not always well tolerated or effective. In such cases, administration of ezetimibe may be useful.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe, with or without statins, after HT.

METHOD

Thirty-six HT patients, 97% of whom were males of overall mean age of 57 +/- 13 years, were all unable to reach target lipid levels with statins alone and/or were intolerant of statins. They were prescribed ezetimibe, with or without a statin. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients were evaluated at 1 month and 12 months. Ezetimibe was prescribed to 27 patients (75%) because of statin inefficacy, and to 9 patients (25%) because of statin intolerance, manifested by myalgia in 4 cases (11%), hepatotoxicity in 2 cases (6%), and rhabdomyolysis in 3 cases (8%). Lipid levels (mg/dL; baseline vs 1 year) were as follows: cholesterol, 235 +/- 49 versus 167 +/- 32 (P = .013); LDL cholesterol, 137 +/- 47 versus 89 +/- 29 (P = .001); HDL cholesterol, 54 +/- 13 versus 51 +/- 10 (P = .235); and triglycerides, 243 +/- 187 versus 143 +/- 72 (P = .022). There were no cases of liver toxicity, renal dysfunction, or significant alteration of immunosuppressive pharmacokinetics. Ezetimibe was withdrawn from 2 patients because of hand edema or asymptomatic recurrence of rhabdomyolysis first caused by statins.

CONCLUSIONS

With or without a statin, ezetimibe was generally well tolerated, reducing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels with no long-term alteration of HDL cholesterol levels. CPK surveillance is recommended because of a slight continued risk of adverse effects. Further studies should evaluate the benefit for survival.

Safety and effectiveness of ezetimibe in liver transplant recipients with hypercholesterolemia

Hypercholesterolemia is a common problem among transplant recipients. Despite package-insert warnings about the potential side effects of the use of statins in patients with chronic liver disease, they are often prescribed for liver transplant recipients. Unlike statins, ezetimibe acts through inhibition of enterohepatic recirculation of lipids. We report the effectiveness and safety of ezetimibe among liver transplant recipients because this has been evaluated previously only in kidney and heart transplant patients. A consecutive cohort of 25 liver graft recipients with serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels > 100 mg/dL (2.5 mmol/L) after a mean (+/-standard deviation) of 55 +/- 21 months following liver transplantation received ezetimibe (10 mg orally every day) for at least 6 months. Serum lipid profiles, liver and renal function tests, and dosages and blood levels of the immunosuppression drugs at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months were prospectively collected. The overall mean age was 58 +/- 12 years, and 56% were males. Statin therapy and fibrates were already being used in 32% and 20% of recipients for elevated LDL and/or triglycerides, respectively. The immunosuppression regimen included cyclosporine in 48% of subjects, tacrolimus in 32%, sirolimus in 48%, and mycophenolate mofetil in 44%; only 12% were on oral prednisone with a maximum daily dose of 5 mg. After ezetimibe was started, an 18% reduction in LDL values was observed [at baseline, 147 +/- 35 mg/dL (3.8 +/- 0.9 mmol/L), and at 6 months, 120 +/- 31 mg/dL (3.1 +/- 0.8 mmol/L); P = 0.010]. After 6 months, an additional 32% achieved the target LDL level of <100 mg/dL. None of the remaining variables, including immunosuppression drug levels, varied significantly during ezetimibe therapy. None of the subjects required adjustments in their pharmacological dosages. One discontinued ezetimibe 3 months later because of cost, 2 subjects had minimal nausea, 1 subject had myalgias without a rise in creatine phosphokinase, and 1 subject had a transient elevation (3-5 times) in liver enzymes from baseline with increases in the total and indirect bilirubin levels. In conclusion, among liver transplant recipients, hypercholesterolemia can be effectively treated with ezetimibe with few side effects and no interaction with immunosuppressive regimens.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and insulin resistance--hope for new therapeutic targets

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of death in patients surviving more than 1 year after heart transplantation. An important cluster of CAV risk factors occurs as a consequence of insulin resistance and manifests as part of the metabolic syndrome. This article summarizes the pathologic features of CAV and reviews the contribution of the major components of insulin resistance in CAV development and progression. It focuses on the few studies that have analyzed the impact of the individual metabolic abnormalities and inflammation and on therapeutic strategies to minimize the clinical manifestation of insulin resistance after heart transplantation.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy and insulin resistance--hope for new therapeutic targets

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major cause of death in patients surviving more than 1 year after heart transplantation. An important cluster of CAV risk factors occurs as a consequence of insulin resistance and manifests as part of the metabolic syndrome. This article summarizes the pathologic features of CAV and reviews the contribution of the major components of insulin resistance in CAV development and progression. It focuses on the few studies that have analyzed the impact of the individual metabolic abnormalities and inflammation and on therapeutic strategies to minimize the clinical manifestation of insulin resistance after heart transplantation.