The Change in B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels Over Time Predicts Significant Rejection in Cardiac Transplant Recipients

European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on the Use of Non-invasive Biomarkers for Cardiothoracic Transplant Rejection Surveillance

While allograft rejection (AR) continues to threaten the success of cardiothoracic transplantation, lack of accurate and repeatable surveillance tools to diagnose AR is a major unmet need in the clinical management of cardiothoracic transplant recipients. Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) and transbronchial biopsy (TBBx) have been the cornerstone of rejection monitoring since the field's incipience, but both suffer from significant limitations, including poor concordance of biopsy interpretation among pathologists. In recent years, novel molecular tools for AR monitoring have emerged and their performance characteristics have been evaluated in multiple studies. An international working group convened by ESOT has reviewed the existing literature and provides a series of recommendations to guide the use of these biomarkers in clinical practice. While acknowledging some caveats, the group recognized that Gene-expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) may be used to rule out rejection in heart transplant recipients, but they are not recommended for cardiac allograft vasculopathy screening. Other traditional biomarkers (NT-proBNP, BNP or troponin) do not have sufficient evidence to support their use to diagnose AR. Regarding lung transplant, dd-cfDNA could be used to rule out clinical rejection and infection, but its use to monitor treatment response is not recommended.

Diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide to detect complications of cardiac transplantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in identifying adverse recipient outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. We included studies reporting associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); or confusion matrices with sensitivities and specificities. Where meta-analysis was inappropriate, studies were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies involving 2,297 cardiac transplantation recipients were included. We report no significant association between BNP or NT-proBNP and significant acute cellular rejection of grade 3A or higher (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.06-0.86) as defined by the latest 2004 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. We also report no strong associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and cardiac allograft vasculopathy or antibody mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

In isolation, serum BNP and NT-proBNP lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to reliably predict adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

Liquid Biopsy, a Potential New Detection Method in Heart Allograft Rejection

Allografts rejection remains the most important reason causing allograft dysfunction in heart transplantation recipients. Currently, the golden standard for detecting graft rejection is endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). As a new noninvasive technique, liquid biopsy emerges along with the great developments of droplet-based digital PCR and the various optimizations of next-generation sequencing technologies, which is also cheaper than EMB. This review introduces several types of liquid biopsy and its application in heart transplantation.

Cardiac Allograft Rejection Induces Changes in Nucleocytoplasmic Transport: RANGAP1 as a Potential Non-Invasive Biomarker

The non-invasive diagnosis of acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a major challenge. We performed a molecular study analyzing the predictive capacity of serum RanGTPase AP1 (RANGAP1) for diagnosing ACR during the first year after heart transplantation (HT). We included the serum samples of 75 consecutive HT patients, extracted after clinical stability, to determine the RANGAP1 levels through ELISA. In addition, various clinical, analytical, and echocardiographic variables, as well as endomyocardial biopsy results, were collected. RANGAP1 levels were higher in patients who developed ACR (median 63.15 ng/mL; (inter-quartile range (IQR), 36.61–105.69) vs. 35.33 ng/mL (IQR, 19.18–64.59); p = 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed that RANGAP1 differentiated between patients with and without ACR (area under curve (AUC), 0.70; p = 0.02), and a RANGAP1 level exceeding the cut-off point (≥90 ng/mL) was identified as a risk factor for the development of ACR (OR, 6.8; p = 0.006). Two independent predictors of ACR identified in this study were higher RANGAP1 and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels. The analysis of the ROC curve of the model showed a significant AUC of 0.77, p = 0.001. Our findings suggest that RANGAP1 quantification facilitates risk prediction for the occurrence of ACR and could be considered as a novel non-invasive biomarker of ACR.

Emergency Department Management of Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients: Unique Immunologic and Hemodynamic Challenges

BACKGROUND

Since the first heart transplant in 1967, there has been significant progress in this field of cardiac transplantation. Approximately 600 pediatric heart transplants are performed every year worldwide. With the increasing number of pediatric heart transplant patients, and given the few tertiary care pediatric transplant centers, adult and pediatric emergency department (ED) providers are increasingly engaged in the care of pediatric heart transplant recipients in the ED.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this article is to review common ED scenarios pertinent to the pediatric heart transplant patients.

DISCUSSION

There are complications unique to this population, such as rejection, opportunistic infections, and medication side effects, that require special considerations, and it is helpful for the emergency medicine (EM) provider to have knowledge about them.

CONCLUSIONS

The unique immunological challenges in these patients, including rejection and medication side effects and opportunistic infections, make this population fragile, and the knowledge of these challenges is helpful for EM providers.

Serum biomarkers of acute rejection: Towards precision medicine in heart transplant

Despite the important changes in the management of heart transplantation in the recent decades, the use of endomyocardial biopsy is still necessary for the follow-up of these patients. However, this technique has several limitations, the most important being the substantial interobserver variability. In the last years multiple attempts have been made to find non-invasive assays for cardiac allograft surveillance, such as imaging modalities and serum biomarkers. This state-of-the-art review focuses on describing the different serum biomarkers that have been proposed for non-invasive diagnosis of acute rejection and that are paving the way towards precision medicine in the field of heart transplantation.

Biomarkers in Advanced Heart Failure: Implications for Managing Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support and Cardiac Transplantation

Biomarkers have a well-defined role in the diagnosis and management of chronic heart failure, but their role in patients with left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplant is uncertain. In this review, we summarize the available literature in this patient population, with a focus on clinical application. Some ubiquitous biomarkers, for example, natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponin, may assist in the diagnosis of left ventricular assist device complications and transplant rejection. Novel biomarkers focused on specific pathological processes, such as left ventricular assist device thrombosis and profiling of leukocyte activation, continue to be developed and show promise in altering the management of the advanced heart failure patient. Few biomarkers at this time have been assessed with sufficient scrutiny to warrant broad, universal application, but encouraging limited data and large potential for impact should prompt ongoing investigation.

HEARTBiT: A Transcriptomic Signature for Excluding Acute Cellular Rejection in Adult Heart Allograft Patients

BACKGROUND

Nine mRNA transcripts associated with acute cellular rejection (ACR) in previous microarray studies were ported to the clinically amenable NanoString nCounter platform. Here we report the diagnostic performance of the resulting blood test to exclude ACR in heart allograft recipients: HEARTBiT.

METHODS

Blood samples for transcriptomic profiling were collected during routine post-transplantation monitoring in 8 Canadian transplant centres participating in the Biomarkers in Transplantation initiative, a large (n = 1622) prospective observational study conducted between 2009 and 2014. All adult cardiac transplant patients were invited to participate (median age = 56 [17 to 71]). The reference standard for rejection status was histopathology grading of tissue from endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). All locally graded ISHLT ≥ 2R rejection samples were selected for analysis (n = 36). ISHLT 1R (n = 38) and 0R (n = 86) samples were randomly selected to create a cohort approximately matched for site, age, sex, and days post-transplantation, with a focus on early time points (median days post-transplant = 42 [7 to 506]).

RESULTS

ISHLT ≥ 2R rejection was confirmed by EMB in 18 and excluded in 92 samples in the test set. HEARTBiT achieved 47% specificity (95% confidence interval [CI], 36%-57%) given ≥ 90% sensitivity, with a corresponding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.56-0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

HEARTBiT's diagnostic performance compares favourably to the only currently approved minimally invasive diagnostic test to rule out ACR, AlloMap (CareDx, Brisbane, CA) and may be used to inform care decisions in the first 2 months post-transplantation, when AlloMap is not approved, and most ACR episodes occur.

Opportunities for microRNAs in the Crowded Field of Cardiovascular Biomarkers

Cardiovascular diseases exist across all developed countries. Biomarkers that can predict or diagnose diseases early in their pathogeneses can reduce their morbidity and mortality in afflicted individuals. microRNAs are small regulatory RNAs that modulate translation and have been identified as potential fluid-based biomarkers across numerous maladies. We describe the current state of cardiovascular disease biomarkers across a range of diseases, including myocardial infarction, acute coronary syndrome, myocarditis, hypertension, heart failure, heart transplantation, aortic stenosis, diabetic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, and sepsis. We present the current understanding of microRNAs as possible biomarkers in these categories and where their best opportunities exist to enter clinical practice.

SERCA2a: A potential non-invasive biomarker of cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

The detection of heart transplant rejection by non-invasive methods remains a major challenge. Despite the well-known importance of the study of sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca²⁺-ATPase (SERCA2a) in the heart, its role as a rejection marker has never been analyzed. Our objective in this study was to determine whether circulating SERCA2a could be a good marker of cardiac rejection.

METHODS

We collected 127 consecutive endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) and serum samples from adult heart transplant recipients (49 without allograft rejection and 78 with the diagnosis of biopsy allograft rejection, including 48 Grade 1R, 21 Grade 2R and 9 Grade 3R). Serum concentrations of SERCA2a were determined using a specific sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. We also analyzed SERCA2a expression changes on EMBs using immunofluorescence.

RESULTS

SERCA2a cardiac tissue and serum levels were decreased in patients with cardiac rejection (p < 0.0001). A receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that SERCA2a strongly discriminated between patients with and without allograft rejection: normal grafts vs all rejecting grafts (AUC = 0.804); normal grafts vs Grade 1R (AUC = 0.751); normal grafts vs Grade 2R (AUC = 0.875); normal grafts vs Grade 3R (AUC = 0.922); normal grafts vs Grade 2R and 3R (AUC = 0.889), with p < 0.0001 for all comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that changes in SERCA2a cardiac tissue and serum levels occur in cardiac allograft rejection. Our findings suggest that SERCA2a concentration assessment may be a relatively simple, non-invasive test for heart transplant rejection, showing a strong capability for detection that improves progressively as rejection grades increase.

Biomarkers of acute rejection following cardiac transplantation

Cardiac transplantation can be a life-saving treatment for selected patients with heart failure. However, despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, acute allograft rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The current 'gold standard' for rejection surveillance is endomyocardial biopsy, which aims to identify episodes of rejection prior to development of clinical manifestations. This is an invasive technique with a risk of false-positive and false-negative results. Consequently, a wide variety of noninvasive alternatives have been investigated for their potential role as biomarkers of rejection. This article reviews the evidence behind proposed alternatives such as imaging techniques, electrophysiological parameters and peripheral blood markers, and highlights the potential future role for biomarkers in cardiac transplantation as an adjunct to biopsy.

Repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, troponin T or C-reactive protein do not predict future allograft rejection in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Studies on the prognostic value of serial biomarker assays for future occurrence of allograft rejection (AR) are scarce. We examined whether repeated measurements of NT-pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin T (TropT) and C-reactive protein (CRP) predict AR.

METHODS

From 2005 to 2010, 77 consecutive heart transplantation (HTx) recipients were included. The NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP were measured at 16 ± 4 (mean ± standard deviation) consecutive routine endomyocardial biopsy surveillance visits during the first year of follow-up. Allograft rejection was defined as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) grade 2R or higher at endomyocardial biopsy. Joint modeling was used to assess the association between repeated biomarker measurements and occurrence of future AR. Joint modeling accounts for dependence among repeated observations in individual patients.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients at HTx was 49 ± 9.2 years, and 68% were men. During the first year of follow-up, 1,136 biopsies and concurrent blood samples were obtained, and 56 patients (73%) experienced at least one episode of AR. All biomarkers were elevated directly after HTx and achieved steady-state after ∼ 12 weeks, both in patients with or without AR. No associations were present between the repeated measurements of NT-proBNP, TropT, or CRP and AR both early (weeks 0-12) and late (weeks 13-52) in the course after HTx (hazard ratios for weeks 13-52: 0.96 (95% confidence interval, 0.55-1.68), 0.67 (0.27-1.69), and 1.44 (0.90-2.30), respectively, per ln[unit]). Combining the three biomarkers in one model also rendered null results.

CONCLUSION

The temporal evolution of NT-proBNP, TropT, and CRP before AR did not predict occurrence of acute AR both in the early and late course of the first year after HTx.

Diagnostic performance of cardiac magnetic resonance for the detection of acute cardiac allograft rejection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several studies have addressed the diagnostic accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) to assess acute cardiac allograft rejection (ACAR) compared with endomyocardial biopsy (EMB). But the methodological heterogeneity limited the clinical application of CMR. Accordingly, we have sought a comprehensive, systematic literature review and meta-analysis for the purpose.

METHODS

Studies prior to September 1, 2014 identified by Medline/PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrance search and citation tracking were examined by two independent reviewers. A study was included if a CMR was used as a diagnostic test for the detection of ACAR.

RESULTS

Of the seven articles met the inclusion criteria. Only four studies using T2 relaxation time as a CMR parameter could be pooled results, because the number of studies using other parameters was less than three. By using DerSimonian-Laird random effects model, meta-analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 90% [95% confidence interval (CI), 79% to 97%], a pooled specificity of 83% (95% CI, 78% to 88%), and a pooled diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 61.66 (95% CI, 18.09 to 210.10).

CONCLUSIONS

CMR seems to have a high sensitivity and moderate specificity in the diagnosis of ACAR. However, as a result of CMR for diagnostic ACAR should be comprehensively considered by physicians and imaging experts in the context of clinical presentations and imaging feature. Further investigations are still required to test different parameters and study condition.

Thoracic organ transplantation: laboratory methods

Although great progress has been achieved in thoracic organ transplantation through the development of effective immunosuppression, there is still significant risk of rejection during the early post-transplant period, creating a need for routine monitoring for both acute antibody and cellular mediated rejection. The currently available multiplexed, microbead assays utilizing solubilized HLA antigens afford the capability of sensitive detection and identification of HLA and non-HLA specific antibodies. These assays are being used to assess the relative strength of donor specific antibodies; to permit performance of virtual crossmatches which can reduce the waiting time to transplantation; to monitor antibody levels during desensitization; and for heart transplants to monitor antibodies post-transplant. For cell mediated immune responses, the recent development of gene expression profiling has allowed noninvasive monitoring of heart transplant recipients yielding predictive values for acute cellular rejection. T cell immune monitoring in heart and lung transplant recipients has allowed individual tailoring of immunosuppression, particularly to minimize risk of infection. While the current antibody and cellular laboratory techniques have enhanced the ability to manage thoracic organ transplant recipients, future developments from improved understanding of microchimerism and graft tolerance may allow more refined allograft monitoring techniques.

Brain natriuretic Peptide production and secretion in inflammation

Gene expression and secretion of the cardiac polypeptide hormones atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are simultaneously upregulated in various cardiac disorders such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and hypertensive heart disease, in which hemodynamic or neuroendocrine changes are key components in the progression of disease. However, during acute cardiac allograft rejection, plasma BNP levels are increased but not those of ANF. Successful treatment of the rejection episode decreases the elevated plasma BNP to prerejection values suggesting that substances related to inflammation may selectively influence BNP gene expression. Indeed, cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1β selectively stimulate cardiac BNP at the transcriptional and translational levels in cardiomyocyte cultures without affecting ANF. This selective BNP increase is seen in vivo, in addition to acute cardiac allograft rejection, in several circumstances where inflammation significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of disease such as in sepsis and in acute myocarditis.

Therapeutic plasma exchange decreases levels of routinely used cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) plays a key role in the management of various diseases, from thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura and Goodpasture's syndrome to cardiac allograft rejection. In many of these disease states cardiac and inflammatory involvement is common and biomarkers are routinely used for diagnosis or assessment of therapeutic success. The effect of TPE on biomarkers used in the clinical routine has not been investigated.

METHODS

TPE was initiated for established clinical conditions in 21 patients. Troponin T, NT-proBNP, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin and routine chemistry were drawn before and after TPE, as well as before and after the 2(nd) TPE. The total amount of these markers in the waste bag was also analyzed.

RESULTS

In 21 patients 42 TPEs were performed. The procedure reduced plasma levels of the examined biomarkers: 23% for NT-proBNP (pre vs. post: 4637±10234 ng/l to 3565±8295 ng/l, p<0.001), 64% for CRP (21.9±47.0 mg/l vs. 7.8±15.8 mg/l, p<0.001) and 31% for procalcitonin (0.39±1.1 µg/l vs. 0.27±0.72 µg/l, p=0.004). TPE also tended to reduce plasma levels of troponin T by about 14% (60.7±175.5 ng/l vs. 52.2±141.3 ng/l), however this difference was not statistical significant (p=0.95). There was a significant correlation between the difference of pre TPE levels to post TPE levels of all examined biomarkers and the total amount of the removed biomarker in the collected removed plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE significantly reduces plasma levels of inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers. Therefore, post TPE levels of cardiac and inflammatory biomarkers should be viewed with caution.

Changes in serial B-type natriuretic peptide level independently predict cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Despite positive associations with rejection, the clinical value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) monitoring in heart transplant recipients has not been established. We sought to determine the predictive value of changes in serial BNP level for identifying patients with acute allograft rejection.

METHODS

BNP, hemodynamics and biopsies were obtained for 205 transplant recipients who underwent a total of 4,007 endomyocardial biopsy procedures. Samples analyzed were collected ≥ 180 days post-transplant, without evidence of rejection on the immediately preceding biopsy. Using a repeated-measures multivariate model, we assessed the association of change in BNP with Grade ≥ 3A (2R) rejection. We also determined predictive values of various cut-off thresholds of change in serial BNP levels to predict Grade ≥ 3A rejection.

RESULTS

There were 47 episodes of Grade ≥ 3A rejection among the 1,350 samples analyzed. Median change in serial BNP (ΔBNP) for those with Grade ≥ 3A rejection was 20 pg/ml (IQR -26 to 169 pg/ml) and among those with Grade <3A rejection was -4 pg/ml (IQR -34 to 22 pg/ml, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, ΔBNP remained the most potent independent predictor of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (p = 0.001). ΔBNP >100 pg/ml predicted increased risk of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (OR = 5.3, p < 0.001) with high specificity (93.3%) and positive predictive value (13.0%) and excellent negative predictive value (97.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Change in serial BNP level is an independent predictor of cardiac allograft rejection. With wide availability, rapid turnaround, low cost, favorable positive predictive value and excellent negative predictive value, serial BNP monitoring has several advantages for non-invasive monitoring of heart transplant recipients for acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Use of a highly sensitive assay for cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide to diagnose acute rejection in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Biomarkers have been proposed to augment or replace endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) to diagnose acute transplant rejection (AR). A new, highly sensitive assay for troponin T detects levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) 10- to 100-fold lower than standard assays but has not been investigated in transplant patients. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has not been evaluated in pediatric transplant patients. The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate the association of cTnT and NT-proBNP with AR in pediatric cardiac transplant patients.

METHODS

Plasma was obtained at the time of EMB from pediatric patients ≥ 1 year old. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide was measured in fresh plasma at the time of biopsy, and cTnT was measured from frozen, stored samples using the highly sensitive assay for troponin T. Biomarker data were correlated with EMB results. Cellular AR was defined as an International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation biopsy score of grade ≥ 2R.

RESULTS

Fifty-three blood samples were obtained from 42 patients (mean age 11 years). Seven episodes of AR occurred in 5 patients. Biopsies with vs without AR were associated with higher cTnT (median [interquartile range {IQR}] 66 [45-139] vs 7 [2-13] pg/mL, P = .001) and NT-proBNP (median [IQR] 11,169 [280-23,317] vs 334 [160-650] pg/mL, P < .01). After successful treatment of AR in 5 patients, cTnT fell markedly (median [IQR] 53.5 [44.8-66.5] to 10.7 [1.5-16.4], P = .05).

CONCLUSION

In this pilot study, we found marked elevation of cTnT and NT-proBNP among children with AR. Moreover, reduction in cTnT levels after treatment paralleled improvement in EMB results. If these findings are confirmed in larger prospective studies, monitoring with these biomarkers may obviate surveillance EMB.

Correlation of noninvasive markers of cardiac allograft rejection with endomyocardial biopsy: a case report

Although endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard to diagnose cardiac allograft rejection, the search continues for clinical parameters that may aid in the early diagnosis of rejection. We report the case of a 29-year-old man who underwent orthotopic heart transplantation and subsequently had multifocal moderate allograft rejection. During the patient's hospital course, he exhibited a number of clinical parameters that served as important clues for the worsening rejection. After aggressive immunosuppression, the improvement of these markers hinted toward his eventual recovery.

Reversible abnormality of electrocardiogram as a sign of acute cardiac rejection after orthotropic heart transplantation

Cardiac allograft rejection can be accompanied by diastolic dysfunction, but the hemodynamic change is usually compensated and hard to be recognized noninvasively. Here we report on two transplanted patients who showed electrocardiogram (ECG) changes suggesting right ventricular overload. Hemodynamic measurement revealed increased right ventricular pressure and endomyocardial biopsy confirmed grade 3R rejection. After rejection was treated with steroid pulse, the ECG alterations were reversed and right ventricular pressure was normalized. In such cases, asymptomatic rejection may be diagnosed by ECG changes that are reversible along with the treatment of rejection, although those ECG changes are apparently non-specific.

Brain-type natriuretic peptide correlates with right heart pressures in a cross section of pediatric heart transplant patients

Serum brain-type natriuretic peptide level (BNP) correlates with hemodynamic parameters measured during cardiac catheterization in adult patients with heart failure. We sought to describe the relationship of BNP with invasive hemodynamic measurements and cellular rejection in children following OHT. Children undergoing catheterization for OHT surveillance had simultaneous measurement of BNP. A total of 62 subjects were studied. The median BNP was 171 pg/mL (range 19-1130). There were significant positive correlations between BNP and mean PAP (R=0.33, p=0.009), RVSP (R=0.25, p=0.05), RVEDP (R=0.29, p=0.02), and mean RAP (R=0.39, p=0.002). Rejection grade varied from 0 to 3A (58 patients < ISHLT 3A and four patients ≥ ISHLT 3A). There was no significant difference in BNP based on cellular rejection grade. In a cohort of pediatric patients after heart transplantation, BNP correlates with direct measurements of right-sided pressures, but not with other hemodynamic measurements, time from transplant or rejection grade. This suggests that BNP may have a complimentary role in the monitoring of children following heart transplantation.