Pre-operative echocardiographic features associated with persistent mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation

Left ventricular assist device implantation and concomitant mitral valve surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of concomitant valvular lesions in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains a topic of debate. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the existing evidence on postoperative outcomes following LVAD implantation, with and without concomitant MV surgery.

METHODS

A systematic database search was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines, of original articles comparing LVAD alone to LVAD plus concomitant MV surgery up to February 2023. The primary outcomes assessed were overall mortality and early mortality, while secondary outcomes included stroke, need for right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implantation, postoperative mitral valve regurgitation, major bleeding, and renal dysfunction.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 10 studies comprising 32 184 patients. It revealed that concomitant MV surgery during LVAD implantation did not significantly affect overall mortality (OR:0.83; 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.29; p = 0.40), early mortality (OR:1.17; 95% CI: 0.63 to 2.17; p = 0.63), stroke, need for RVAD implantation, postoperative mitral valve regurgitation, major bleeding, or renal dysfunction. These findings suggest that concomitant MV surgery appears not to confer additional benefits in terms of these clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Based on the available evidence, concomitant MV surgery during LVAD implantation does not appear to have a significant impact on postoperative outcomes. However, decision-making regarding MV surgery should be individualized, considering patient-specific factors and characteristics. Further research with prospective studies focusing on specific patient populations and newer LVAD devices is warranted to provide more robust evidence and guide clinical practice in the management of valvular lesions in LVAD recipients.

Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: A Contemporary Review

Secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) in patients with heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In recent decades, SMR has received increasing scientific attention. Advances in echocardiography, computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging have refined our ability to diagnose, quantify and characterize SMR. Concurrently, the treatment options for this high-risk patient population have continued to evolve. Guideline-directed medical therapies including beta-blockers, angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors target the underlying cardiomyopathy, and along with diuretics to treat pulmonary congestion, remain the cornerstone of therapy. Cardiac resynchronization therapy also reduces MR, alleviates symptoms and prolongs life in selected HF patients with SMR. While data supporting surgical mitral valve repair or replacement for SMR are limited, transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) has been demonstrated to improve survival, reduce the rate of hospitalization for heart failure, and improve functional capacity and quality-of-life in select patients with SMR who remain symptomatic despite medical therapy. Emerging transcatheter mitral valve repair and replacement technologies are undergoing investigation in TEER-eligible and TEER-ineligible patients. The optimal management of HF patients with SMR requires a multidisciplinary team of cardiologists, cardiac surgeons, imaging experts, and other organ specialists to select the best treatment approaches to improve the prognosis of these high-risk patients.

Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: Contemporary Insights and Future Perspectives

Late right heart failure (RHF) is increasingly recognized in patients with long-term left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and is associated with decreased survival and increased incidence of adverse events such as gastrointestinal bleeding and stroke. Progression of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction to clinical syndrome of late RHF in patients supported with LVAD is dependent on the severity of pre-existing RV dysfunction, persistent or worsening left- or right-sided valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, inadequate or excessive left ventricular unloading, and/or progression of the underlying cardiac disease. RHF likely represents a continuum of risk with early presentation and progression to late RHF. However, de novo RHF develops in a subset of patients leading to increased diuretic requirement, arrhythmias, renal and hepatic dysfunction, and heart failure hospitalizations. The distinction between isolated late RHF and RHF due to left-sided contributions is lacking in registry studies and should be the focus of future registry data collection. Potential management strategies include optimization of RV preload and afterload, neurohormonal blockade, LVAD speed optimization, and treatment of concomitant valvular disease. In this review, the authors discuss definition, pathophysiology, prevention, and management of late RHF.

Prognostic value of mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device deployment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) represent an important therapeutic option for patients progressing to end-stage heart failure. LVAD has previously been shown to have a promising role in improving mitral regurgitation (MR). Nevertheless, the prognostic value of preoperative uncorrected MR in this population remains unclear.

METHODS

A systematic database search with meta-analysis was conducted of comparative original articles of patients with preoperative mild MR (Grade 0-I) versus moderate-severe MR (Grade II-III) undergoing LVAD implantation, in EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane database, and Google Scholar, from inception to June 2022. Primary outcomes were overall and operative mortality. Secondary outcomes were neurological dysfunction, gastrointestinal bleeding, right heart failure, LVAD thrombosis, and driveline infection.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 2228 relevant studies. A total of 19 studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 11 873 patients. LVAD caused a statistically significant decrease of 35.9% in the number of patients with moderate-severe MR (grade II-III) postoperatively. No significant difference was observed in terms of overall mortality, operative mortality, GI bleeding, LVAD thrombosis, and driveline infection rates between mild and moderate-severe MR. An increased rate of right heart failure was seen among patients with moderate-severe MR, while lower rates of neurological events were also observed.

CONCLUSION

LVAD improves the haemodynamics of the left ventricle, to promote resolution of MR. Nevertheless, the severity of preoperative mitral regurgitation in patients undergoing LVAD deployment does not seem to affect mortality.

Mitral regurgitation severity at left ventricular assist device implantation is associated with distinct myocardial transcriptomic signatures

OBJECTIVES

We examined for differences in pre-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation myocardial transcriptome signatures among patients with different degrees of mitral regurgitation (MR).

METHODS

Between January 2018 and October 2019, we collected left ventricular (LV) cores during durable LVAD implantation (n = 72). A retrospective chart review was performed. Total RNA was isolated from LV cores and used to construct cDNA sequence libraries. The libraries were sequenced with the NovaSeq system, and data were quantified using Kallisto. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) and Gene Ontology analyses were performed, with a false discovery rate <0.05 considered significant.

RESULTS

Comparing patients with preoperative mild or less MR (n = 30) and those with moderate-severe MR (n = 42), the moderate-severe MR group weighted less (P = .004) and had more tricuspid valve repairs (P = .043), without differences in demographics or comorbidities. We then compared both groups with a group of human donor hearts without heart failure (n = 8). Compared with the donor hearts, there were 3985 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for mild or less MR and 4587 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. Specifically altered genes included 448 DEGs for specific for mild or less MR and 1050 DEGs for moderate-severe MR. On GSEA, common regulated genes showed increased immune gene expression and reduced expression of contraction and energetic genes. Of the 1050 genes specific for moderate-severe MR, there were additional up-regulated genes related to inflammation and reduced expression of genes related to cellular proliferation.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation with moderate-severe MR had increased activation of genes related to inflammation and reduction of cellular proliferation genes. This may have important implications for myocardial recovery.

Managing valvular pathology during LVAD implantation

Since the time of their invention, implantable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have improved the quality of life and extended survival for patients with advanced heart failure. The decision surgeons and their physician colleagues make with these patients to undergo implantation must come with full understanding of the immediate, short-term, and long-term implications of such a life-changing procedure. The presence of pathology regarding the aortic, mitral, and tricuspid valves introduces particularly complex problems for the surgical treatment strategy. Concomitant valve repair or replacement increases cardiopulmonary bypass and cross clamp times, and could potentially lead to worse outcomes in the perioperative setting. Following perioperative recovery, valvular pathology may worsen or arise de novo given the often drastic immediate physiologic changes in blood flow, septal function, and, over time, ventricular remodeling. Over the past two decades, there has been vast improvement in the device manufacturing, surgical techniques, and medical management surrounding LVAD implantation. Yet, addressing concomitant valvular pathology remains a complex question with no perfect solutions. This review aims to briefly describe the evolution of approach to valvular pathology in the LVAD patient and offer our opinion and treatment rationale.

Predictors and clinical implications of residual mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device therapy

BACKGROUND

Correction of mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial. There is conflicting evidence regarding the clinical impact of residual MR, and studies have not examined whether MR aetiology or right heart function impacts the likelihood of residual MR.

METHODS

This is a retrospective single-centre study of 155 consecutive patients with LVAD implantation from January 2011 to March 2020. Exclusion criteria were no MR pre-LVAD (n=8), inaccessible echocardiography (n=9), duplicate records (n=10) and concomitant mitral valve repair (n=1). Statistical analysis was performed using STATA V.16 and SPSS V.24.

RESULTS

Carpentier IIIb MR aetiology was associated with more severe MR pre-LVAD (severe 18/27 (67%) vs non-severe 32/91 (35%), p=0.004) and a higher likelihood of residual MR (8/11 (72%) vs 30/74 (41%), p=0.045). Of 95 patients with significant MR pre-LVAD, 15 (16%) had persistent significant MR, which was associated with higher mortality (p=0.006), post-LVAD right ventricle (RV) dilatation (10/15 (67%) vs 28/80 (35%), p=0.022) and RV dysfunction (14/15 (93%) vs 35/80 (44%), p<0.001). Aside from ischaemic aetiology, other pre-LVAD parameters that were associated with significant residual MR included left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) (6.9 cm (5.7-7.2) vs 5.9 cm (5.5-6.5), p=0.043), left atrial volume index (LAVi) (78 mL/m² (56-88) vs 57 mL/m² (47-77), p=0.021), posterior leaflet displacement (2.5 cm (2.3-2.9) vs 2.3 cm (1.9-2.7), p=0.042) and basal right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (RVEDD) (5.1±0.8 cm vs 4.5±0.8 cm, p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

LVAD therapy improves MR and tricuspid regurgitation severity in the majority, but 14% have persistent significant residual MR, associated with right ventricular dysfunction and higher long-term mortality. This may be predicted pre-LVAD by greater LVESD, RVEDD and LAVi and by ischaemic aetiology.

Pathophysiology and management of valvular disease in patients with destination left ventricular assist devices

Over the last two decades, implantable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have proven to be invaluable tools for the management of selected advanced heart failure patients, improving patient longevity and quality of life. The presence of concomitant valvular pathology, including that involving the tricuspid, mitral, and aortic valve, has important implications relating to the decision to move forward with LVAD implantation. Furthermore, the presence of concomitant valvular pathology often influences the surgical strategy for LVAD implantation. Concomitant valve repair or replacement is not uncommonly required in such circumstances, which increases surgical complexity and has demonstrated prognostic implications both short and longer term following LVAD implantation. Beyond the index operation, it is also well established that certain valvular pathologies may develop or worsen over time following LVAD support. The presence of pre-existing valvular pathology or that which develops following LVAD implant is of particular importance to the destination therapy LVAD patient population. As these patients are not expected to have the opportunity for heart transplantation in the future, optimization of LVAD support including ameliorating valvular disease is critical for the maximization of patient longevity and quality of life. As collective experience has grown over time, the ability of clinicians to effectively address concomitant valvular pathology in LVAD patients has improved in the pre-implant, implant, and post-implant phase, through both medical management and procedural optimization. Nevertheless, there remains uncertainty over many facets of concomitant valvular pathology in advanced heart failure patients, and the understanding of how to best approach these conditions in the LVAD patient population continues to evolve. Herein, we present a comprehensive review of the current state of the field relating to the pathophysiology and management of valvular disease in destination LVAD patients.

Role of the mitral valve in left ventricular assist device pathophysiology

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in the setting of heart failure results from progressive dilatation of the left ventricle (LV) and mitral annulus. This leads to leaflet tethering with posterior displacement. Contrary to common assumptions, MR often does not resolve with LVAD decompression of the LV alone. The negative impact of significant (moderate-severe) mitral regurgitation in the LVAD setting is becoming better recognized in terms of its harmful effect on right heart function, pulmonary vascular resistance and hospital readmissions. However, controversies remain regarding the threshold for intervention and management. At present, there are no consensus indications for the repair of significant mitral regurgitation at the time of LVAD implantation due to the conflicting data regarding potential adverse effects of MR on clinical outcomes. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of MR pathophysiology in patients supported with LVAD and potential future management strategies.

Ventricular assist devices in transposition and failing systemic right ventricle: role of tricuspid valve replacement

OBJECTIVES

Ventricular assist device (VAD) for systemic right ventricular (RV) failure patients post-atrial switch, for transposition of the great arteries (TGA), and those with congenitally corrected TGA has proven useful to reduce transpulmonary gradient and bridge-to-transplantation. The purpose of this study is to describe our experience of VAD in systemic RV failure and our move towards concomitant tricuspid valve replacement (TVR).

METHODS

This is a single-centre retrospective study of consecutive adult patients receiving HeartWare VAD for systemic RV failure between 2010 and 2019. From 2017, concomitant TVR was performed routinely. Demographic, clinical variables and echocardiographic and haemodynamic measurements pre- and post-VAD implantation were recorded. Complications on support, heart transplantation and survival rates were described.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients underwent VAD implantation. Moderate or severe systemic tricuspid regurgitation was present in 83.3% of patients, and subpulmonic left ventricular impairment in 88.9%. One-year survival was 72.2%. VAD implantation was technically feasible and successful in all but one. Post-VAD, transpulmonary gradient fell from 16 (15-22) to 10 (7-13) mmHg (P = 0.01). Patients with TVR (n = 6) also demonstrated a reduction in mean pulmonary and wedge pressures. Furthermore, subpulmonic left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (44.3 vs 39.6 mm; P = 0.03) and function improved in this group. After 1 year of support, 72.2% of patients were suitable for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

VAD is an effective strategy as bridge-to-candidacy and bridge-to-transplantation in patients with end-stage systemic RV failure. Concomitant TVR at the time of implant is associated with better early haemodynamic and echocardiographic results post-VAD.

Prognostic impact of functional mitral regurgitation prior to left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) is a common finding of advanced heart failure with detrimental effects. The prognostic impact of uncorrected FMR prior to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains controversial.

METHODS

Between 2016 and 2019 77 patients underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at our institution. 34 patients showed FMR ≥ 2 (MR-group), whereas 43 patients showed FMR < 2 (Control-group). Data was retrospectively analyzed. Primary composite endpoint comprised freedom from death, stroke, pump-thrombosis, major bleeding and right heart failure (RHF) after 1 year.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics, including the severity of left and right ventricular dysfunction, and periprocedural results were comparable. The overall survival during a mean follow up of 24.9 months was 55.9% in the MR-group versus 58.1% in the Control-group (p = 0.963), whereas 1-year event-free survival was 35.3% in the MR-group compared to 44.2% in the Control-group (p = 0.404). RHF within the first postoperative year occurred more frequently in the MR-group (35.3% vs. 11.6%; p = 0.017). Furthermore, RV function was significantly reduced in comparison to baseline values in the MR-group. 12 months after surgery, 74% of patients in the MR-group were classified as NYHA III in comparison to 24% of patients in the Control-group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative uncorrected FMR prior to LVAD implantation did not affect overall survival, nevertheless it was associated with an impaired RV function and increased incidence of right heart failure during follow-up. Furthermore, preoperative FMR ≥ 2 was associated with persistent symptoms of heart failure.

Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation in Patients with Preoperative Severe Mitral Regurgitation

We examined cardiac features associated with residual mitral regurgitation (MR) following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implant. From 2003 to 2017, 134 patients with severe MR underwent cfVLAD implant without mitral valve (MV) intervention. Echocardiographic (echo) assessment occurred pre-cfLVAD, early post-cfLVAD, and at last available echo. Ventricular and atrial volumes were calculated from established formulas and normalized to be predicted. Cluster analysis based on preoperative normalized left ventricular and atrial volumes, and MV height identified grades 1, 2, and 3 with progressively larger cardiac chamber sizes. Median early echo follow-up was 0.92 (0.55, 1.45) months and the last follow-up was 15.12 (5.28, 38.28) months. Mitral regurgitation improved early after cfLVAD by 2.10 ± 1.16 grades (p < 0.01). Mitral regurgitation severity at the last echocardiogram positively correlated with the preoperative left ventricular volume (p = 0.014, R = 0.212), left atrial volume (p = 0.007, R = 0.233), MV anteroposterior height (p = 0.032, R = 0.185), and MV mediolateral diameter (p = 0.043, R = 0.175). Morphologically, smaller grade 1 hearts were correlated with MR resolution at the late follow-up (p = 0.023). Late right ventricular failure (RVF) at the last clinical follow-up was less in grade 1 (4/48 [8.3%]) compared with grades 2 and 3 (26/86 [30.2%]), p = 0.004). Grade 1 cardiac dimensions correlates with improvement in severe MR and had less late RVF.

Validation of mitral regurgitation reversibility in patients with HeartMate 3 implantation

The resolution of functional mitral valve regurgitation (MR) in patients awaiting left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is discussed controversially. The present study analyzed MR and echocardiographic parameters of the third-generation LVAD HeartMate 3 (HM3) over 3 years. Of 135 LVAD patients (with severe MR, n = 33; with none, mild, or moderate MR, n = 102), data of transthoracic echocardiography were included preoperatively to LVAD implantation, up to 1 month postoperatively, and at 1, 2, and 3 years after LVAD implantation. Demographic data and clinical characteristics were collected. Severe MR was reduced immediately after LVAD implantation in all patients. The echocardiographic parameters left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P < .001), right ventricular end-diastolic diameter (P < .001), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (P < .001), and estimated pulmonary artery pressure (P < .001) decreased after HM3 implantation independently from the grade of MR prior to implantation and remained low during the 2 years follow-up period. Following LVAD implantation, right heart failure, ventricular arrhythmias, ischemic stroke as well as pump thrombosis and bleeding events were comparable between the groups. The incidences of death and cardiac death did not differ between the patient groups. Furthermore, the Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that survival was comparable between the groups (P = .073). HM3 implantation decreases preoperative severe MR immediately after LVAD implantation. This effect is long-lasting in most patients and reinforces the LVAD implantation without MR surgery. The complication rates and survival were comparable between patients with and without severe MR.

Fate of preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation following left ventricular assist device implantation

OBJECTIVE

We examined for improvements in preoperative moderate mitral regurgitation following continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implantation.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2020, 190 patients with moderate MR underwent cfVLAD implant without concomitant mitral valve (MV) surgery. Cardiac dimensions and contractility, as well as valve function, were assessed with an echocardiogram (echo) pre-cfLVAD, and at approximately 1 month post-cfLVAD. Outcomes were determined by retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Median echo follow-up was 0.94 (0.53, 1.38) months. Residual significant moderate or greater MR was present in 30/190 (15.8%) on follow-up. Patients with significant residual MR had larger preoperative left ventricular internal diameters in diastole (74.4 ± 8.7 vs. 71.1.0 ± 9.1 mm, p = .034). Significant residual MR was associated with higher preoperative mean pulmonary artery pressures (OR = 1.055, p = .035) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (OR = 1.060, p = .034). Significant residual MR on echo was not associated with any survival difference (p = .325). The 1, 5, and 10 year survival were 89.9%, 55.2%, and 34.2%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with moderate MR undergoing LVAD implantation, the likelihood of significant residual MR is low and mitral intervention in this population is not recommended. However, select patients with larger preoperative left heart dimensions and pulmonary vascular pressures may be at risk for persistent residual MR.

Inflow Cannula Position Influences Improvement in Mitral Regurgitation After Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Significant residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The effect of cannula position on improvement of preexisting MR has yet to be evaluated. Consecutive patients who underwent centrifugal LVAD implantation with >mild preoperative MR and without concomitant mitral repair were reviewed. Left ventricular assist device position was determined by the angle between actual and ideal inflow cannula on computed tomography. The magnitudes of angles (anterior and lateral angle) were added to form an LVAD position assessment (LVADpa). Mitral regurgitation was numerically classified, and improvement in MR was determined by difference in MR preoperatively to MR >1 month postoperatively with a median of 162 (interquartile range: 78-218) days. The primary analysis examined the relationship between LVADpa and postoperative MR. Forty-one patients were identified with >mild preoperative functional MR. Mean age was 51 ± 13 years with an ejection fraction of 16 ± 4%. Overall, MR improved from moderate-severe preoperatively to mild postoperatively (p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, higher LVADpa deviation was associated with greater postoperative MR (odds ratio [OR] = 2.29, p = 0.005) and higher 1-month pulsatility index was associated with lower postoperative MR (OR = 0.47, p = 0.011). Inflow cannula position during centrifugal LVAD implantation is an important determinant of postoperative MR.

Persistent mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device: a clinical conundrum

Aims

Persistent mitral valve regurgitation (MR) after continuous flow left ventricular assist device implantation (cfLVAD) is associated with pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular failure with variable effects on survival across published studies. The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and predictors of persistent MR at 6‐month follow‐up after cfLVAD implantation and its impact on survival, haemodynamics, right ventricular function, and morbidity.

Methods and results

We performed a retrospective review of all adult cfLVAD recipients from January 2012 to June 2017 at a single tertiary university hospital with follow‐up until April 2019. Primary outcome was to compare survival between patients with no‐to‐mild compared with persistent moderate‐to‐severe MR at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included right heart failure (RHF), length of stay, re‐hospitalizations, and composite of death, transplant, and pump exchange during the length of follow‐up. Final analytic sample was 111 patients. The incidence of persistent moderate or severe MR at 6 months was 26%. Significant predictors of persistent MR at 6 months were left atrium dimension and volume. The group with persistent moderate‐to‐severe MR at 6 months had higher incidence of RHF at 6 months (45% vs. 25%, P = 0.04). There was no difference in survival at 1 year between the groups (no‐to‐mild MR 85.5%, moderate‐to‐severe MR 87.9%, Wilcoxon P‐value = 0.63). There was no difference in re‐hospitalizations, length of stay, composite of death, transplant, or pump exchange during the length of follow‐up between the comparison groups.

Conclusions

Persistent moderate‐to‐severe MR after cfLVAD implantation is present in one fourth of patients and is associated with increased incidence of RHF, higher mean pulmonary pressure, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure with no effect on 1 year survival. Increased left atrium size was associated with persistent moderate‐to‐severe MR at 6 months.

Impact of Pre-Existing Mitral Regurgitation Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant

OBJECTIVES

Optimal management of significant mitral regurgitation (SMR) during left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement remains uncertain. This study evaluates the effect of untreated preop SMR on outcomes following LVAD implant.

METHODS

Adults undergoing primary LVAD placement from April 2004 to May 2017 were included. Most recent preop transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) was used to divide patients into an SMR group with moderate or greater regurgitation, and a group without SMR. Patients underwent LVAD implant without correction of SMR. Primary endpoint was 3-year postoperative survival, with secondary endpoints of length of stay (LOS), resolution of SMR following LVAD on postdischarge (30 day) TTE, and 1-year TTE.

RESULTS

LVAD placement was performed in 270 patients, 172 (63.7%) without SMR and 98 (36.3%) with SMR. There were no differences in comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and renal disease. Preop ejection fraction was similar, but a higher pulmonary vascular resistance was recorded in the SMR group (3.6 vs 3.0 Wood Units, P = 0.048). There was no difference in 3-year mortality between the 2 cohorts (log-rank P = 0.0.803). The SMR group had decreased LOS (median 19.5 vs 22 days, P = 0.009). Of the 98 SMR patients, 91 (92.9%) had resolution of SMR to less than moderate at 30 days. At 1 year, 15% of those with preoperative SMR had recurrent SMR.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing LVAD placement with preop SMR experience no differences in mortality, and a majority experience resolution of MR after implant. Longer-term SMR recurrence and need for mitral intervention with LVAD implant warrant further investigation.

Consequences of functional mitral regurgitation and atrial fibrillation in patients with left ventricular assist devices

BACKGROUND

Functional mitral regurgitation (MR) (FMR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are common in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. However, the impact of FMR and AF on clinical outcomes is uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics and prognostic significance of FMR and AF in patients with LVADs.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent LVAD implantation at our center between January 2010 and December 2017. We defined significant FMR as the ratio of MR color jet area to left atrial area of >20% and persistent or permanent AF (PeAF) as persistent or permanent AF at LVAD implantation.

RESULTS

A total of 380 patients were included in this analysis. Patients were divided into 6 groups: patients with no PeAF and no significant FMR (Group 1), patients with no PeAF but with significant FMR (Group 2), patients with PeAF but no significant FMR (Group 3), patients with PeAF and significant FMR (Group 4), patients with concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) at LVAD implantation and without PeAF (Group 5), and patients with concomitant MVS and with PeAF (Group 6). A total of 56 patients (15%) died within 2 years. Kaplan-Meier curve analysis demonstrated a 2-year survival of 81% in Group 1, 89% in Group 2, 87% in Group 3, 47% in Group 4, 87% in Group 5, and 79 % in Group 6 (log-rank test, p < 0.001). The multivariable Cox proportional-hazards model showed that classification in Group 4 was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio, 4.31; 95% CI: 2.19-8.46; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The coexistence of significant FMR and PeAF may represent a poor prognostic marker in patients undergoing LVAD implantation.

Predictors of residual mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation

Patients with advanced heart failure often have functional mitral regurgitation. Left ventricular assist device implantation improves functional mitral regurgitation through left ventricular unloading. However, residual mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation leads to adverse outcomes, and whether patients need concomitant mitral valve surgery is not fully elucidated. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the predictors of residual mitral regurgitation and to describe the temporal changes in residual mitral regurgitation. We retrospectively enrolled 15 patients with implantable continuous-flow left ventricular assist device, who had significant mitral regurgitation on echocardiography before left ventricular assist device implantation. Three patients had residual mitral regurgitation (mitral regurgitation color jet area/left atrial area >0.2) 1 month after left ventricular assist device implantation. We investigated factors associated with residual mitral regurgitation and compared patients with or without residual mitral regurgitation. On univariate analysis, mitral valve tethering area and mitral regurgitation vena contracta before left ventricular assist device implantation were significantly associated with residual mitral regurgitation (odds ratio, 1.03; p = 0.036 and odds ratio, 10.45; p = 0.0087). One month after left ventricular assist device implantation, the mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and pulmonary artery pressure were higher in patients with residual mitral regurgitation (pulmonary capillary wedge pressure: 11.3 ± 3.5 vs 6.4 ± 3.4 mmHg, p = 0.029 and pulmonary artery pressure: 21.3 ± 4.0 vs 15.9 ± 3.3 mmHg, p = 0.023). However, the mitral regurgitation grading and hemodynamics were not significantly different 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation. The hospitalization-free survival was not significantly different between the two groups. Mitral valve tethering area and mitral regurgitation vena contracta were predictors of residual mitral regurgitation. Residual mitral regurgitation improved until 6 months after left ventricular assist device implantation and might not affect the prognosis.

Hemodynamic Effects of Concomitant Mitral Valve Surgery and Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

There are conflicting data regarding whether concomitant mitral valve surgery (MVS) at left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is beneficial. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of concomitant MVS. Of all 73 enrolled patients, 44 patients had undergone concomitant MVS and 29 patients had not. Before LVAD implantation, MVS group had higher pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p = 0.04). After LVAD implantation, MVS group had higher mean pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac output (CO). During the hemodynamic ramp study, MVS group had steeper CO slopes (0.18 [0.13 0.28] vs. 0.15 [0.08, 0.20] L/min/step; p = 0.04) at incremental LVAD speed and achieved a higher CO at the optimized set speed (5.5 [4.7, 6.9] vs. 4.9 [4.0, 5.7] L/min; p = 0.03). One-year freedom from death or heart failure readmission was statistically comparable between the two groups (61% vs. 80%, p = 0.20). Thus far, after LVAD implantation and concomitant MVS, patients had increased pulmonary hypertension, despite having higher CO and a better response of CO at incremental LVAD speed. The implication of hemodynamic features after concomitant MVS on clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.

Continuous-Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Valvular Heart Disease: A Comprehensive Review

Mechanical circulatory support with implantable durable continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (CF-LVADs) represents an established surgical treatment option for patients with advanced heart failure refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy. CF-LVAD therapy has been demonstrated to offer significant survival, functional, and quality-of-life benefits. However, nearly one-half of patients with advanced heart failure undergoing implantation of a CF-LVAD have important valvular heart disease (VHD) present at the time of device implantation or develop VHD during support that can lead to worsening right or left ventricular dysfunction and result in development of recurrent heart failure, more frequent adverse events, and higher mortality. In this review, we summarize the recent evidence related to the pathophysiology and treatment of VHD in the setting of CF-LAVD support and include a review of the specific valve pathologies of aortic insufficiency (AI), mitral regurgitation (MR), and tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Recent data demonstrate an increasing appreciation and understanding of how VHD may adversely affect the hemodynamic benefits of CF-LVAD support. This is particularly relevant for MR, where increasing evidence now demonstrates that persistent MR after CF-LVAD implantation can contribute to worsening right heart failure and recurrent heart failure symptoms. Standard surgical interventions and novel percutaneous approaches for treatment of VHD in the setting of CF-LVAD support, such as transcatheter aortic valve replacement or transcatheter mitral valve repair, are available, and indications to intervene for VHD in the setting of CF-LVAD support continue to evolve.

Contrasting Effects of Pharmacological, Procedural, and Surgical Interventions on Proportionate and Disproportionate Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Chronic Heart Failure

Two distinct pathways can lead to functional mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with chronic heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction. When remodeling and enlargement of the left ventricle (LV) cause annular dilatation and tethering of the mitral valve leaflets, there is a linear relationship between LV end-diastolic volume and the effective regurgitant orifice area of the mitral valve. These patients, designated as having proportionate MR, respond favorably to treatments that lead to reversal of LV remodeling and a decrease in LV volumes (eg, neurohormonal antagonists and LV assist devices), but they may not benefit from interventions that are directed only at the mitral valve leaflets (eg, transcatheter mitral valve repair). In contrast, when ventricular dyssynchrony causes functional MR attributable to unequal contraction of the papillary muscles, the magnitude of regurgitation is greater than that predicted by LV volumes. These patients, designated as having severe but disproportionate MR, respond favorably to treatments that are directed to the mitral valve leaflets or their supporting structures (eg, cardiac resynchronization or transcatheter mitral valve repair), but they may derive little benefit from interventions that act only to reduce LV cavity size (eg, pharmacological treatments). This novel conceptual framework reflects the important interplay between LV geometry and mitral valve function in determining the clinical presentation of patients, and it allows characterization of the determinants of functional MR to guide the most appropriate therapy in the clinical setting.

Right ventricular function and residual mitral regurgitation after left ventricular assist device implantation determines the incidence of right heart failure

BACKGROUND

The effect of significant mitral regurgitation (MR) on outcomes after continuous flow left ventricular assist device (cfLVAD) implantation remains unclear.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from 159 patients with preoperative severe MR who underwent cfLVAD implantation (2003-2017). Two-step cluster analysis using the log-likelihood distance for post-cfLVAD implantation parameters, which included right ventricular (RV) dysfunction, MR severity, and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) severity. Post-cfLVAD implantation echocardiographic parameters were obtained within the first month.

RESULTS

Cluster analysis resulted in 3 groups. Group 1 (n = 67) had mild or less MR with moderate-severe RV dysfunction (RVD). Group 2 (n = 43) had moderate-severe MR with moderate-severe RVD. Group 3 (n = 49) had moderate MR with mild RVD. Group 2 had the largest proportion with Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support score of 1 (30.2%) and 2 (41.9%). They were more likely to undergo temporary mechanical circulatory support (18.6%) and tricuspid valve procedure (62.8%). Group 2 had the highest rate of stroke (30.2%; P = .02), hemolysis (39.5%; P = .01), device thrombosis (30%; P = .01), and worst survival (46.5%; P = .01). Survival at 5 years for groups 1, 2, and 3 were 56.0%, 17.6%, and 55.8%. Regression analysis of the entire population showed that greater MR severity after cfLVAD was associated with RV failure (P < .05; odds ratio, 1.6) and RV assist device use (P = .09; odds ratio, 1.6). After excluding tricuspid valve repairs, MR severity had a positive correlation with TR severity (R = 0.33; P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

After cfLVAD implantation, moderate-severe MR and RVD predicted RV failure. Patients with preoperative moderate-severe MR and TR coupled with moderate-severe RVD might benefit the most from mitral and tricuspid valve intervention.

Mitral valve repair for severe mitral valve regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

The management of severe mitral regurgitation (MR) at the time of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is controversial. We adopted an approach of systematic repair of severe MR at the time of LVAD implantation and report our experience.

METHODS

We performed mitral valve repair (MVr) on 78 consecutive patients with severe MR undergoing LVAD implantation at our institution between 2013 and 2017. We compared data on these patients to 28 historical controls with severe MR from the immediate preceding period between 2011 and 2013 where the MR was not treated, using Cox modeling and propensity score methods. Median follow-up time was 17.7 months.

RESULTS

Patients who underwent MVr were younger than those who did not (non-MVr group) (55 vs 63 years; P = .006), but otherwise had similar preoperative characteristics. The incidence of 30-day mortality (2.6% vs 3.6%; P = .78) and other early major adverse events was similar in both groups. At 3 months, no patient in the MVr group had more than mild MR compared with 7 patients (29%) in the non-MVr group (P < .001). Cardiac catheterization done 3 to 6 months after surgery showed tendency toward greater reduction from preoperative pulmonary artery systolic pressure in the MVr group compared with the non-MVr group (-20 vs -13 mm Hg; P = .10). The cumulative incidence of readmission due to congestive heart failure at 2 years was lower in the MVr group than in non-MVr group (7.1% vs 19.7%; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.76; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent MVr at the time of LVAD implantation can be done safely without increase in perioperative adverse events. MVr may be associated with better reduction in severity of MR and may have potential benefit in terms of reduction in readmissions for heart failure.

Effect of concomitant mitral valve procedures for severe mitral regurgitation during left ventricular assist device implantation

The effect of performing a concomitant mitral valve procedure (MVP) during continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation has been reported for patients with moderate-to-severe mitral regurgitation (MR), but moderate MR is less of a clinical concern for CF-LVAD patients. There is a paucity of reports focusing on patients with severe MR. Thus, the purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of performing a concomitant MVP during CF-LVAD implantation in patients with severe preoperative MR. Between November 2003 and March 2016, 526 patients underwent primary implantation of a CF-LVAD at our center. Patients with severe MR who underwent a concomitant MVP were compared to those who did not in regard to overall survival, perioperative complications, postoperative echocardiography data, bridge-to-transplantation success, and CF-LVAD explantation. Of the 108 patients with severe MR, 26 underwent a concomitant MVP and 82 did not. These groups showed no difference in survival (p = 0.61). Additionally, the two groups had similar rates of postoperative right heart failure (p = 0.69) and readmissions (p = 0.42). The 24-month follow-up echocardiography results were also similar. Furthermore, the groups showed no difference in bridge-to-cardiac transplantation success (30.0% vs 25.0%, p = 0.80) or CF-LVAD explantation rates (0.0% vs 0.0%. p = 1.0). Our findings suggest that patients with severe MR who undergo a MVP during CF-LVAD implantation do not have superior outcomes to those who do not. However, assessments of other outcomes may show some benefits to performing concomitant MVPs.

Impact of Residual Valve Disease on Survival After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

This retrospective single-institutional study investigated the effect of significant valvular regurgitation after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and the role of concomitant valve surgery during LVAD surgery.

METHODS

All patients receiving an LVAD (HeartMate II; Abbott, Abbott Park, IL) during 2008 and 2015 were enrolled. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the valve status at the end of the operation: patients without significant valvular regurgitation (no-VR) and those with significant valvular regurgitation (residual-VR).

RESULTS

An LVAD was implanted in 270 patients. Of these, 233 had significant preoperative valve disease(s), and 180 (66.6%) received concomitant valve interventions (35 aortic, 90 mitral, 138 tricuspid). At the completion of the LVAD operation, 204 had no-VR and 66 had residual-VR. Short-term outcomes were similar in two groups, except for longer cardiopulmonary bypass time in the no-VR group (149 minutes) than in the residual-VR group (132 minutes, p = 0.038). During follow-up, mean pulmonary artery pressure (24 mm Hg in no-VR vs 27 mm Hg in residual-VR; p = 0.018) and pulmonary vascular resistance (1.8 Wood units in no-VR vs 2.7 Wood units in residual-VR, p = 0.008) significantly improved in no-VR group compared with the residual-VR group. Survival and heart failure admission-free rates at 1 year were significantly superior in the no-VR group compared with the residual-VR group (1-year survival: 72% ± 3% No-VR vs 55% ± 6% residual-VR; log-rank p = 0.026; admission-free survival: 91% ± 2% no-VR vs 74% ± 7% residual-VR; log-rank p = 0.026). Concomitant valve intervention was not an independent predictor of in-hospital death and morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of valvular lesion after LVAD implantation was associated with improved midterm hemodynamics and survival in the current study. Aggressive surgical intervention for significant valve disease(s) at the time of LVAD implant may be beneficial to selected patients.

MitraClip procedure prior to left ventricular assist device implantation

Background

Functional mitral valve regurgitation is a frequent consequence of left ventricular dysfunction in patients with severe heart failure and is associated with a poor prognosis. It is hypothesized that in this patient group the mitral valve repair, respectively replacement, improves hemodynamics and clinical symptoms. As operative interventions with the help of heart-lung-machine are high risk procedures in these cases, the transcatheter mitral repair with MitraClip^® (Abbott Vascular, IL, USA) has recently become frequently used. Most of these cases experience a progress in left ventricular dysfunction, which finally leads to in an implantation of a left ventricular assist device. In this report, we describe a series of six cases in which patients with end stage heart failure and consecutive functional mitral valve regurgitation were supported with a left ventricular assist device after MitraClip implantation. We aimed to investigate, whether the MitraClip implantation leads to an improvement of the hemodynamic prior left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-implantation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 6 patients (5 males, 1 female) with severe heart failure, who underwent LVAD implantation after the MitraClip procedure. The mean age at MitraClip procedure was 64.6 years, mean age at time of LVAD implantation was 65.5 years. The parameters examined were cardiac index (CI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP).

Results

All patients had functional mitral regurgitation (MR). Severity of MR was reduced successfully in all treated patients. All patients were discharged with MR I-II and NYHA functional class III or IV after MitraClip procedure. The mean CI was 2.93 before MitraClip procedure and 2.36 before LVAD-Implantation. Mean LVEDD was 71 mm before MitraClip, mean LVEDD was 70.6 mm before LVAD, and 63.2mm after LVAD implantation respectively. The mean PCWP was 21.5 mmHg before MitraClip and 19.8 mmHg before LVAD implantation respectively. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 19.2% before MitraClip, the mean LVEF was 17.6% before LVAD and 15% after LVAD implantation. Two of the LVAD implanted patients died due to post-operative complications. There were no complications after MitraClip procedure.

Conclusions

Our presented patient cohort presented little hemodynamic improvement after the MitraClip procedure. There was no clinical benefit for the patients after MitraClip procedure, progressing left ventricular dysfunction could not be prevented and resulted in subsequent LVAD implantation.

Concomitant mitral repair and continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: Is it warranted?

BACKGROUND

Pre-existing mitral pathology is common in patients undergoing continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation. We sought to investigate whether concurrent mitral repair confers any advantage.

METHODS

From March 2004 to October 2014, 374 patients received a continuous-flow left ventricular assist device. Of these, a total of 115 patients with pre-existing mitral regurgitation (MR) greater than moderate were identified and included in the analysis. Outcomes were compared between patients with concurrent mitral repair (n = 52 [45.2%]; Group A) and without repair (n = 63 [54.8%]; Group B).

RESULTS

The mean age was 56.8 years and 25 (21.5%) were women. Patients in Group A were more likely to have undergone destination therapy (48.1% vs 11.1%; P < .001) and had a greater cardiopulmonary bypass time (125 vs 89 minutes; P < .001) than did patients in Group B. Longitudinal analysis using a generalized mixed-effects model demonstrated the odds of developing moderate or severe MR during device support were 86% lower for Group A patients (P < .001). Among those who were discharged alive, 9 (8.6%)-consisting of 1 (2.2%) in Group A and 8 (13.6%) in Group B (P = .039)-developed late right heart failure requiring a total of 13 readmissions (0.03 vs 0.15 readmissions per patient-year; P = .011). Multivariable competing risks regression revealed mitral repair to be a protective factor (hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% confidence interval, 0.03-0.94; P = .042) for late right heart failure occurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent mitral repair appears to be efficacious in controlling MR after device implant. The fact that repaired patients developed late right heart failure less frequently than did patients without repair challenges the notion that concurrent mitral repair is unwarranted.

Impact of Residual Mitral Regurgitation on Right Ventricular Systolic Function After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Significant mitral regurgitation (MR) is thought to decrease after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, and therefore repair of mitral valve is not indicated in current practice. However, residual moderate and severe MR leads to pulmonary artery pressure increase, thereby resulting in right ventricular (RV) dysfunction during follow-up. We examined the impact of residual MR on systolic function of the right ventricle by echocardiography after LVAD implantation. This study included 90 patients (mean age: 51.7 ± 10.9 years, 14.4% female) who underwent LVAD implantation (HeartMate II = 21, HeartWare = 69) in a single center between December 2010 and June 2014. Echocardiograms obtained at 3-6 months and over after implantation were analyzed retrospectively. RV systolic function was graded as normal, mild, moderate, and severely depressed. MR (≥moderate) was observed in 43 and 44% of patients at early and late period, respectively. Systolic function of the RV was severely depressed in 16 and 9% of all patients. Initial analysis (mean duration of support 174.3 ± 42.5 days) showed a statistically significant correlation between less MR and improved systolic function of RV (P = 0.01). Secondary echocardiographic analysis (following a mean duration of support of 435.1 ± 203 days) was also statistically significant for MR degree and RV systolic dysfunction (P = 0.008). Residual MR after LVAD implantation may cause deterioration of RV systolic function and cause right-sided heart failure symptoms. Repair of severe MR, in selected patients such as those with severe pulmonary hypertension and depressed RV, may be considered to improve the patient's clinical course during pump support.

Challenges faced in long term ventricular assist device support

INTRODUCTION

The development of ventricular assist device (VAD) has been one of the revolutionary advancements in end-stage heart failure management. Although the device has developed and improved significantly over the last few decades, we still face multiple challenges.

AREAS COVERED

This review will discuss quality of life, survival, and clinically encountered complications in patients with VAD support. The literature was extensively reviewed for studies describing the above topic area. We describe the impact of major challenges faced in VAD support and discuss their future and expectations. Expert commentary: The technological advancement of VADs has contributed to major improvement of overall survival, enhancement of quality of life and decrease of incidence of complications. It is expected that technologies will continue to evolve. At the same time, the indications for and timing of device implantation, and selection of device type are continuously important in clinical practice setting.

Mitral Valve Regurgitation with a Rotary Left Ventricular Assist Device: The Haemodynamic Effect of Inlet Cannulation Site and Speed Modulation

Mitral valve regurgitation (MVR) is common in patients receiving left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support, however the haemodynamic effect of MVR is not entirely clear. This study evaluated the haemodynamic effect of MVR with LVAD support and the influence of inflow cannulation site and LVAD speed modulation. Left atrial (LAC) and ventricular (LVC) cannulation was evaluated in a mock circulation loop with no, mild, moderate and severe MVR with constant speed and speed modulation (±600 RPM) modes. The use of an LVAD relieved pulmonary congestion during severe MVR, by reducing left atrial pressure from 20.5 to 10.8 (LAC) and 11.5 (LVC) mmHg. However, LAC resulted in decreased left ventricular stroke work (-0.08 J), ejection fraction (-7.9%) and higher MVR volume (+12.7 mL) and pump speed (+100 RPM) compared to LVC. This suggests that LVC, in addition to reducing MVR severity, also improves ventricular washout over LAC. LVAD speed modulation in synchrony with ventricular systole reduced MVR volume and increased ejection fraction with LAC and LVC, thus demonstrating the potential benefits of this mode, despite a reduction in cardiac output.

Durable left ventricular assist device therapy in advanced heart failure: Patient selection and clinical outcomes

The increasing adoption of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) into clinical practice is related to a combination of engineering advances in pump technology and improvements in understanding the appropriate clinical use of these devices in the management of patients with advanced heart failure. This review intends to assist the clinician in identifying candidates for LVAD implantation, to examine long-term outcomes and provide an overview of the common complications related to use of these devices.

Uncorrected pre-operative mitral valve regurgitation is not associated with adverse outcomes after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Mitral valve regurgitation (MR) is prevalent in patients with heart failure. Because very few data exist examining the influence of significant pre-operative MR on outcomes after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, we evaluate our experience.

METHODS

Between October 1996 and August 2013, 756 patients underwent primary LVAD implantation at our institutions. Of these, 508 patients received a continuous-flow LVAD and represent the contemporary cohort for this analysis. Devices implanted included the HeartMate II in 410 patients (81%) and HeartWare HVAD in 98 patients (19%). Based on availability of pre-operative echocardiography, 491 patients were divided into 2 study groups according to degree of pre-operative MR; 189 patients (39%) had moderate to severe or greater MR (MR group), and 302 (61%) had less than moderate to severe MR (less MR group). Median age at operation (60 years in MR group vs 58 years in less MR group, p = 0.19), male sex (78% in MR group vs 81% in less MR group, p = 0.42), and ischemic etiology (46% in MR group vs 51% in less MR group, p = 0.35) were similar between groups.

RESULTS

There were 40 early deaths (7.9%), and follow-up was available in all 468 early survivors for 641 patient-years of support. Patients in the MR group had higher late survival (2 years, 75%; 4 years, 65%) compared with patients in the less MR group (2 years, 66%; 4 years, 48%; p < 0.04). Cox proportional hazards model confirmed the independent interaction between MR and late survival (hazard ratio 0.62, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

There was improved survival in patients with severe pre-operative MR after continuous-flow LVAD implantation in our cohort. These findings may lend insight into the possible lack of value of addressing significant MR at the time of LVAD implantation.