A multi-institutional study of malignancies after heart transplantation and a comparison with the general United States population

Incidence of de novo malignancy and all-cause mortality among heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Heart transplant recipients develop cancer at two-times the rate compared to the general population. However, the incidence and mortality rates and the adjusted association between cancer and mortality remains unclear.

METHODS

We estimated the incidence and mortality rates and the adjusted association between developing cancer (any, skin, hematologic, and solid tumor subtypes) and the all-cause mortality rates among adult heart transplant recipients from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients from October 1, 1987, until June 28, 2020.

RESULTS

Among 51,597 adult heart transplant recipients, 13,191 (25.6%) were diagnosed with de novo malignancy throughout the follow-up period. The cumulative incidence cancer at years 1, 5, 10, and 20 was 3%, 16.4%, 32.8%, and 56.6%, respectively. Among those with cancer, the cumulative mortality was 17.5%, 42.3%, 65%, and 91% at years 1, 5, 10, and 20, respectively. The incidence rate of any de novo malignancy was 38.7 cases per 1000 person-years and the mortality rate (for those with cancer) was 115.2 cases per 1000 person-years. Compared to those without cancer, those with cancer had a higher adjusted mortality association [HR: 2.14 (2.07, 2.21)]. The strongest associations were estimated for pancreatic [10.63 (8.34, 13.54)], leukemia [8.06 (4.33, 15.00)], and esophagus [6.94 (5.43, 8.87)] malignancies. The association between de novo malignancies and mortality was higher in the earlier years of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Compared to not developing cancer, those with de novo malignancy have a 2-fold higher mortality rate, on average. The strength of the association varies by cancer subtype and by follow-up time.

Mechanistic Understanding of EBV+Lymphoproliferative Disease Development After Transplantation

Posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are among the most common malignant complications after transplantation, leading to a drastic reduction in patient survival rates. The majority of PTLDs are tightly linked to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV+PTLDs) and are the result of an uncontrolled proliferation of EBV-infected cells. However, although EBV infections are a common finding in transplant recipients, most patients with high EBV loads will never develop EBV+PTLD. Natural killer cells and EBV-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes are critical for controlling EBV-infected cells, and the impairment of these cytotoxic immune responses facilitates the unfettered proliferation of EBV-infected cells. Recent years have seen a considerable increase in available literature aiming to describe novel risk factors associated with the development of EBV+PTLD, which may critically relate to the strength of EBV-specific natural killer cell and EBV-CD8+ T lymphocyte responses. The accumulation of risk factors and the increased risk of developing EBV+PTLD go hand in hand. On the one hand, most of these risk factors, such as the level of immunosuppression or the EBV donor and recipient serologic mismatch, and distinct genetic risk factors are host related and affect cytotoxic EBV-specific immune responses. On the other hand, there is growing evidence that distinct EBV variants may have an increased malignant potential and are thus more likely to induce EBV+PTLD. Here, we aim to review, from a mechanistic point of view, the risk factors for EBV+PTLD in the host and the infecting EBV variants that may explain why only a minority of transplant recipients develop EBV+PTLD.

A phantom for targeted endomyocardial biopsy training

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) of the right ventricular (RV) septal surface during cardiac catheterization is the standard method to assess cardiac allograft rejection, heart failure, or inflammatory cardiomyopathies. We developed methodology using a three-dimensional (3D) printed phantom to provide proof of concept for using biplane overlay technology for targeted EMB. A standard bioptome and steerable sheath were used to discern feasibility of biopsy for seven regions of the RV septum guided by 3D overlay. This novel biopsy phantom can help train operators in biopsy techniques, and biplane overlay technology has the potential to advance targeted EMB in transplant and cardiomyopathy populations.

Characterization of de novo malignancy after orthotopic heart transplantation: single-centre outcomes over 20 years

OBJECTIVES

Malignancy is the leading cause of late mortality after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT), and the burden of post-transplantation cancer is expected to rise in proportion to increased case volume following the 2018 heart allocation score change. In this report, we evaluated factors associated with de novo malignancy after OHT with a focus on skin and solid organ cancers.

METHODS

Patients who underwent OHT at our institution between 1999 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 488). Terminal outcomes of death and development of skin and/or solid organ malignancy were assessed as competing risks. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards regression was used to evaluate the association between perioperative patient and donor characteristics and late-term malignancy outcomes.

RESULTS

By 1, 5 and 10 years, an estimated 2%, 17% and 27% of patients developed skin malignancy, while 1%, 5% and 12% of patients developed solid organ malignancy. On multivariable Fine-Gray regression, age [1.05 (1.03-1.08); P < 0.001], government payer insurance [1.77 (1.20-2.59); P = 0.006], family history of malignancy [1.66 (1.15-2.38); P = 0.007] and metformin use [1.73 (1.15-2.59); P = 0.008] were associated with increased risk of melanoma and basal or squamous cell carcinoma. Age [1.08 (1.04-1.12); P < 0.001] and family history of malignancy [2.55 (1.43-4.56); P = 0.002] were associated with an increased risk of solid organ cancer, most commonly prostate and lung cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Vigilant cancer and immunosuppression surveillance is warranted in OHT recipients at late-term follow-up. The cumulative incidence of skin and solid organ malignancies increases temporally after transplantation, and key risk factors for the development of post-OHT malignancy warrant identification and routine monitoring.

SM, Rábago Juan-Aracil G, Castel-Lavilla MA, Blasco-Peiro T, Garrido-Bravo I, De La Fuente-Galán L, Muñiz J, Crespo-Leiro MG. Incidence and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer After Heart Transplantation: Data From the Spanish Post-Heart Transplant Tumor Registry

In this observational and multicenter study, that included all patients who underwent a heart transplantation (HT) in Spain from 1984 to 2018, we analyzed the incidence, management, and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) after HT. Of 6,244 patients with a HT and a median follow-up of 8.8 years since the procedure, 116 CRC cases (11.5% of noncutaneous solid cancers other than lymphoma registered) were diagnosed, mainly adenocarcinomas, after a mean of 9.3 years post-HT. The incidence of CRC increased with age at HT from 56.6 per 100,000 person-years among under 45 year olds to 436.4 per 100,000 person-years among over 64 year olds. The incidence rates for age-at-diagnosis groups were significantly greater than those estimated for the general Spanish population. Curative surgery, performed for 62 of 74 operable tumors, increased the probability of patient survival since a diagnosis of CRC, from 31.6% to 75.7% at 2 years, and from 15.8% to 48.6% at 5 years, compared to patients with inoperable tumors. Our results suggest that the incidence of CRC among HT patients is greater than in the general population, increasing with age at HT.

Influence of chronic kidney disease and other risk factors pre-heart transplantation on malignancy incidence post-heart transplantation

Aims

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) pre-heart transplantation (HTx) has been proposed as a risk factor for malignancy risk post-HTx. Using multicenter registry data, our aim was to calculate the death-adjusted annual incidence of malignancies post-HTx, corroborate the association between CKD pre-HTx and malignancy risk post-HTx, and determine other risk factors for post-HTx malignancies.

Methods and materials

We used data from patients transplanted in North American HTx centers between January 2000 and June 2017 and registered in the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Thoracic Organ Transplant Registry. We excluded recipients with missing data on post-HTx malignancies, heterotopic heart transplant, retransplantation, multi-organ transplantation, and patients with a total artificial heart pre-HTx.

Results

Overall, 34,873 patients were included to determine the annual incidence of malignancies, 33,345 patients were included in the risk analyses. The incidence of any malignancy, solid-organ malignancy, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), and skin cancer adjusted for death 15 years post-HTx, was 26.6%, 10.9%, 3.6%, and 15.8% respectively. Besides widely acknowledged risk factors, CKD stage ≥4 pre-HTx was associated with the development of all malignancies post-HTx (HR 1.17 compared to CKD stage 1, p = 0.023), as well as solid-organ malignancies (HR 1.35, p = 0.01), but not for PTLD (HR 0.73, p = 0.057), and skin cancer (HR 1.06, p = 0.59).

Conclusion

Risk of malignancy post-HTx remains high. CKD stages ≥4 pre-HTx was associated with an increased risk for any malignancy and solid-organ malignancy post-HTx. Strategies to mitigate the impact of pre-HTx patient factors on the risk of post-HTx malignancy are needed.

Characteristics, outcomes, and predictors of de novo malignancy after heart transplantation

Background

Post-transplant malignancy (PTM) causes long-term morbidity and mortality in heart transplant (HTx) recipients. However, the detailed characteristics or predictors of PTM are not well-known. We evaluated the incidence, characteristics, long-term outcomes, and predictors of de novo PTM using a single center large-volume database.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the types and characteristics of de novo PTM in 989 patients who underwent HTx. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for the PTM prediction model.

Results

Two hundred and six patients (20.8%) had de novo PTMs (241 cancers) during a median follow-up of 11.5 years. PTM patients were older than non-PTM patients, received immunosuppressive therapy for a longer period, and were more likely to be male and white. Skin cancers were the most frequent types of malignancy (60.6%) followed by prostate (9.5%), lung (7.1%), and breast (4.1%) cancers. Although most cancers (88.8%) were surgically resected at initial presentation, about half (47.3%) recurred or progressed. Patients with skin cancer and non-skin cancer had significantly lower overall survival (P < 0.001) than patients without cancer. Older age (P < 0.001), white race (P = 0.001), and longer time receiving immunosuppressive therapy (P < 0.001) were independent predictors for PTM.

Conclusion

Older age, white race, and longer administration of immunosuppressive therapies were independent risk factors for PTM, which was associated with increased mortality. Further research is necessary for the prevention and early detection of PTM in HTx recipients.

Post-transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder Following Cardiac Transplantation

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a spectrum of lymphoid conditions frequently associated with the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) and the use of potent immunosuppressive drugs after solid organ transplantation. PTLD remains a major cause of long-term morbidity and mortality following heart transplantation (HT). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a key pathogenic driver in many PTLD cases. In the majority of PTLD cases, the proliferating immune cell is the B-cell, and the impaired T-cell immune surveillance against infected B cells in immunosuppressed transplant patients plays a key role in the pathogenesis of EBV-positive PTLD. Preventive screening strategies have been attempted for PTLD including limiting patient exposure to aggressive immunosuppressive regimens by tailoring or minimizing immunosuppression while preserving graft function, anti-viral prophylaxis, routine EBV monitoring, and avoidance of EBV seromismatch. Our group has also demonstrated that conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor, sirolimus, as a primary immunosuppression was associated with a decreased risk of PTLD following HT. The main therapeutic measures consist of immunosuppression reduction, treatment with rituximab and use of immunochemotherapy regimens. The purpose of this article is to review the potential mechanisms underlying PTLD pathogenesis, discuss recent advances, and review potential therapeutic targets to decrease the burden of PTLD after HT.

Effects of traditional Chinese medicine collaborative model (TCMCM) combined with adjuvant chemotherapy on IIIb and IIIc gastric cancer: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Metastasis and/or recurrence can decrease the survival time of gastric cancer patients undergoing radical operation. Among them, those with stage IIIb and IIIc are especially at a high risk of metastasis and recurrence. The traditional Chinese medicine collaborative model (TCMCM) has been used in the treatment of cancer; however, its effects have not been systematically evaluated. This study is designed to evaluate whether TCMCM can decrease adverse effects after chemotherapy and reduce the recurrence and metastasis of stage IIIb and IIIc gastric cancer.

Methods/design

This prospective, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial will recruit 260 patients with stage IIIb and IIIc gastric cancer who undergo radical surgery for D2 lymphadenectomy. The patients will be randomly assigned to receive usual adjuvant chemotherapy and TCMCM (intervention group) in a 1:1 ratio. Patients in the intervention group will receive an oral traditional Chinese formula, auricular acupressure, and acupoint therapy. All participants will receive usual adjuvant chemotherapy. The primary outcome is a 3-year disease-free survival rate. Secondary outcomes include quality of life, side effects caused by chemotherapy, and safety-related measures. Assessments will be performed during the screening period, at 4 and 8 cycles after adjuvant chemotherapy, and 9, 12, 18, 24, 30, and 36 months after randomization. Adverse events will be recorded. In addition, biological samples will be collected for mechanism analysis.

Discussion

This will be the first clinical trial to evaluate the effects of TCMCM on disease-free survival (DFS) and quality of life in patients with stage IIIb and IIIc gastric cancer. Our results may be used to standardize TCMCM. We will also perform a larger-scale clinical trial in the future.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.govNCT03607656. Registered on 1 July 2018. The final protocol version is V1.1.

Implications of cancer prior to and after heart transplantation

Cancer and cardiovascular disease share many risk factors. Due to improved survival of patients with cancer, the cohort of cancer survivors with heart failure referred for heart transplantation (HT) is growing. Specific considerations include time interval between cancer treatment and HT, risk for recurrence and risk for de novo malignancy (dnM). dnM is an important cause of post-HT morbidity and mortality, with nearly a third diagnosed with malignancy by 10 years post-HT. Compared with the age-matched general population, HT recipients have an approximately 2.5-fold to 4-fold increased risk of developing cancer. HT recipients with prior malignancy show variable cancer recurrence rates, depending on years in remission before HT: 5% recurrence if >5 years in remission, 26% recurrence if 1-5 years in remission and 63% recurrence if <1 year in remission. A myriad of mechanisms influence oncogenesis following HT, including reduced host immunosurveillance from chronic immunosuppression, influence of oncogenic viruses, and the cumulative intensity and duration of immunosuppression. Conversely, protective factors include acyclovir prophylaxis, use of proliferation signal inhibitors (PSI) and female gender. Management involves reducing immunosuppression, incorporating a PSI for immunosuppression and heightened surveillance for allograft rejection. Cancer treatment, including immunotherapy, may be cardiotoxic and lead to graft failure or rejection. Additionally, there exists a competing risk to reduce immunosuppression to improve cancer outcomes, which may increase risk for rejection. A multidisciplinary cardio-oncology team approach is recommended to optimise care and should include an oncologist, transplant cardiologist, transplant pharmacist, palliative care, transplant coordinator and cardio-oncologist.

Influence of renal insufficiency pre-heart transplantation on malignancy risk post-heart transplantation

Aims

Recent reports demonstrated that patients with heart failure (HF) might have an increased risk to develop malignancies. This is also seen in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Immunosuppression in heart transplantation (HT) recipients additionally increases the risk of malignancies. The aim of this study was to determine the relation between HF duration and CKD pre‐HT and the risk of malignancy development post‐HT.

Methods and results

We included all adult HT recipients transplanted between January 2000 and November 2017 in our centre. Patients were excluded if they died or were retransplanted within 3 months post‐HT. Clinical characteristics were retrospectively collected. Sixty out of 250 patients (24%) developed a malignancy after a median of 66 months [interquartile range 33–108] post‐HT. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, HF duration was not a risk factor for all malignancies or solid organ malignancies post‐HT [hazard ratio (HR) 1.033 (0.974–1.096), P = 0.281 and HR 1.036 (0.958–1.120), P = 0.376, respectively]. Age [HR 1.051 (1.016–1.086), P = 0.004] and CKD pre‐HT [HR 2.173 (1.236–3.822), P = 0.007] were independent risk factors for all malignancies. CKD pre‐HT [HR 2.542 (1.142–5.661), P = 0.022] increased the risk for solid organ malignancies. Exclusion of patients with durable mechanical circulatory support in the analysis did not alter the significance of these risk factors.

Conclusions

Duration of HF pre‐HT was not associated with malignancy risk post‐HT. CKD was an independent risk factor for malignancies post‐HT. More studies are needed to investigate this association.

Malignancy following heart transplantation: differences in incidence and prognosis between sexes - a multicenter cohort study

Male patients are at increased risk for developing malignancy postheart transplantation (HT); however, real incidence and prognosis in both genders remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess differences in incidence and mortality related to malignancy between genders in a large cohort of HT patients. Incidence and mortality rates were calculated for all tumors, skin cancers (SCs), lymphoma, and nonskin solid cancers (NSSCs) as well as survival since first diagnosis of neoplasia. 5865 patients (81.6% male) were included. Total incidence rates for all tumors, SCs, and NSSCs were lower in females [all tumors: 25.7 vs. 44.8 per 1000 person-years; rate ratio (RR) 0.68, (0.60-0.78), P < 0.001]. Mortality rates were also lower in females for all tumors [94.0 (77.3-114.3) vs. 129.6 (120.9-138.9) per 1000 person-years; RR 0.76, (0.62-0.94), P = 0.01] and for NSSCs [125.0 (95.2-164.0) vs 234.7 (214.0-257.5) per 1000 person-years; RR 0.60 (0.44-0.80), P = 0.001], albeit not for SCs or lymphoma. Female sex was associated with a better survival after diagnosis of malignancy [log-rank p test = 0.0037; HR 0.74 (0.60-0.91), P = 0.004]. In conclusion, incidence of malignancies post-HT is higher in males than in females, especially for SCs and NSSCs. Prognosis after cancer diagnosis is also worse in males.

High rates of de novo malignancy compromise post-heart transplantation survival

BACKGROUND

Transplant patients are known to have increased risk of developing de novo malignancies (DNMs). As post-transplant survival increases, DNM represents an obstacle to further improving survival. We sought to examine the incidence, types, and risk factors for post-transplant DNM.

METHODS

We studied adult heart transplant recipients from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database (1987-2018). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine annual probabilities of developing DNM, excluding squamous and basal cell carcinoma. Rates were compared to the general population in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to calculate hazard ratios for risk factors of DNM development, all-cause, and cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

Over median follow-up of 6.9 years, 18% of the 49,361 patients developed DNM, which correlated with an incidence rate 3.8 times that of the general population. The most common malignancies were lung, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder, and prostate. Risk was most increased for female genital, tongue/throat, and renal cancers. Male gender, older age, smoking history, and impaired renal function were risk factors for developing DNM, whereas the use of MMF for immunosuppression was protective. Cigarette use, increasing age, the use of ATG for induction and calcineurin inhibitors for maintenance were risk factors for cancer-specific mortality. The development of a DNM increased the risk of death by 40% (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart transplant patients are at increased risk of malignancy, particularly rare cancers, which significantly increases their risk of death. Strict cancer surveillance and attention to immunosuppression are critical for prolonging post-transplant survival.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement on Heart Transplantation: Patient Eligibility, Selection, and Post-Transplantation Care

Significant practice-changing developments have occurred in the care of heart transplantation candidates and recipients over the past decade. This Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement provides evidence-based, expert panel recommendations with values and preferences, and practical tips on: (1) patient selection criteria; (2) selected patient populations; and (3) post transplantation surveillance. The recommendations were developed through systematic review of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The evolving areas of importance addressed include transplant recipient age, frailty assessment, pulmonary hypertension evaluation, cannabis use, combined heart and other solid organ transplantation, adult congenital heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis, high sensitization, and post-transplantation management of antibodies to human leukocyte antigen, rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and long-term noncardiac care. Attention is also given to Canadian-specific management strategies including the prioritization of highly sensitized transplant candidates (status 4S) and heart organ allocation algorithms. The focus topics in this position statement highlight the increased complexity of patients who undergo evaluation for heart transplantation as well as improved patient selection, and advances in post-transplantation management and surveillance that have led to better long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients.

Cancer incidence and mortality after heart transplantation - A population-based national cohort study

Background: Cancer is currently one of the most important factors affecting the long-term health and survival of heart transplant patients. Material and methods: We calculated the standardized incidence ratios (SIR) for different cancer sites and the cancer-specific standardized mortality ratio (SMR) by linking a cohort of 479 adult heart transplant recipients transplanted in 1985-2014 (4491.6 person-years of follow-up) with data from the national Finnish Cancer Registry until the end of 2015, and with the data from the Statistics Finland's national registry of causes of death. Results: A total of 267 cancers occurred in 143 patients (SIR 6.0; 95% confidence interval (CI) 5.3-6.7). The SIR for overall cancer was considerably higher for men (SIR 6.7; 95% CI 5.9-7.5) than for women (1.4; 95% CI 0.6-2.6). Most frequent cancers were non-melanoma skin cancers (basal cell carcinoma 83 cases, squamous cell skin cancer (SCC) 56 cases), followed by Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) (36 cases), lung cancer (17), cancer of prostate (16) and cancer of kidney (12). SIRs were highest for SCC (51.9; 95% CI 39.2-67.4), lip cancer (47.4; 95% CI 19.1-97.7), cancer of tongue (26.3; 95% CI 7.2-67.4), and NHL (25.7; 95% CI 18.0-35.6). For most cancers, SIRs increased steadily by time since transplantation. Cancer mortality was three times higher for heart transplant recipients than for the population (SMR 3.1; 95% CI 2.1-4.1). Conclusions: Both cancer incidence and mortality are remarkably increased after heart transplantation, with the relative incidence most elevated for SCC, lip and other oral cancers, and for NHL.

Evaluation after Orthotopic Heart Transplant: What the Radiologist Should Know

Orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) is the treatment of choice for end-stage heart disease. As OHT use continues and postoperative survival increases, multimodality imaging evaluation of the transplanted heart will continue to increase. Although some of the imaging is performed and interpreted by cardiologists, a substantial proportion of images are read by radiologists. Because there is little to no consensus on a systematic approach to patients after OHT, radiologists must become familiar with common normal and abnormal posttreatment imaging features. Intrinsic transplant-related complications may be categorized on the basis of time elapsed since transplant into early (0-30 days), intermediate (1-12 months), and late (>12 months) stages. Although there can be some overlap between stages, it remains helpful to consider the time elapsed since surgery, because some complications are more common at certain stages. Recognition of differing OHT surgical techniques and their respective postoperative imaging features helps to avoid image misinterpretation. Expected early postoperative findings include small pneumothoraces, pleural effusions, pneumomediastinum, pneumopericardium, postoperative atelectasis, and an enlarged cardiac silhouette. Early postoperative complications also can include sternal dehiscence and various postoperative infections. The radiologist's role in the evaluation of allograft failure and rejection, endomyocardial biopsy complications, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and posttransplant malignancy is highlighted. Because clinical manifestations of disease may be delayed in transplant recipients, radiologists often recognize postoperative complications on the basis of imaging and may be the first to suggest a specific diagnosis and thus positively affect patient outcomes. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2019.

BK Virus: A Cause for Concern in Thoracic Transplantation?

Human BK polyomavirus (BKV) infection is poorly documented in heart and lung transplant patients. BK viruria and viremia have been estimated to affect 19% and 5% of heart transplant recipients, respectively. Data are limited, especially for lung transplantation, but the proportion of patients progressing from BK viruria to viremia or BKV-related nephropathy (BKVN) appears lower than in kidney transplantation. Nevertheless, a number of cases of BKVN have been reported in heart and lung transplant patients, typically with late diagnosis and generally poor outcomes. Risk factors for BKV infection or BKVN in this setting are unclear but may include cytomegalovirus infection and anti-rejection treatment. The relative infrequency of BKVN or other BK-related complications means that routine BKV surveillance in thoracic transplantation is not warranted, but a diagnostic workup for BKV infection may be justified for progressive renal dysfunction with no readily-identifiable cause; after anti-rejection therapy; and for renal dysfunction in patients with cytomegalovirus infection or hypogammaglobulinemia. Treatment strategies in heart or lung transplant recipients rely on protocols developed in kidney transplantation, with reductions in immunosuppression tailored to match the higher risk status of thoracic transplant patients.

Comprehensive Review on Colorectal Cancer and Transplant

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide. Some studies suggest that organ recipients are at a higher risk for CRC than the general population. The underlying transplant indications and their inherent risk factors for CRC may drive the variation in incidence rates that are seen in patients receiving different allografts. Recipients with cystic fibrosis are now recognized as a population at high risk for CRC at a young age. Transplant recipients have high mortality following a CRC diagnosis, even if it is detected at an early stage. Certain types of immunosuppression have been shown to accelerate cancer transformation and may contribute to the more aggressive phenotype seen in organ recipients. Given the high incidence and progressive nature of posttransplant CRC, shorter screening intervals with a modality that can detect early-stage polyps may be essential to prevent mortality. Future research is needed to better elucidate the role of immunosuppression in carcinogenesis. This comprehensive review examines CRC risk, screening, and management specific to organ transplant candidates and recipients.

Surgical Treatment of Heart Failure

More than 5 million Americans suffer from heart failure and more than 250,000 die annually. Cardiac surgery, as applied to advanced heart failure, has evolved significantly in the past 50 years. Current therapeutic interventions are focused on the appropriate assessment of myocardial dysfunction as a means to select the right patient for the appropriate procedure using state-of-the-art myocardial viability testing and metabolic testing to determine candidacy for conventional interventions, mechanical devices, or transplant. Advances in mechanical circulatory support with more efficient and less morbid ventricular assist devises offer the potential to change the trajectory of this growing epidemiologic dilemma.

Cancer After Heart Transplantation: A 25-year Single-center Perspective

BACKGROUND

Cancer is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation.

METHODS

We studied 541 heart transplant patients from a single center over a period of 25 years, with a mean follow-up of 10.7 years. We determined incidence, type, risk factors, and prognosis for cancer after heart transplantation.

RESULTS

Cancer was diagnosed in 181 patients, at a mean of 7.7 years after transplantation. Cumulative incidence of cancer at 5, 10, and 20 years was 14%, 29%, and 60%, respectively. The most frequent cancers were spinocellular skin cancer (22%), basocellular skin cancer (19%), lung cancer (16%), lymphoma (11%) and prostate cancer (10%). Age at transplantation > 50 years (hazard ratio, 2.9; P < .001) and male recipient gender (hazard ratio, 1.7; P = .038) were significant risk factors for posttransplant malignancy on multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Median patient survival after diagnosis of cancer was 2.9 years for patients with noncutaneous cancer, versus 13.1 years for patients with only skin cancer (P < .001).

Reducing Fluoroscopic Radiation Exposure During Endomyocardial Biopsy in Pediatric Transplant Recipients

Endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) with fluoroscopy is used for rejection surveillance in pediatric heart transplantation. Lowering frame rate may reduce radiation, but decreases temporal resolution and image quality. We undertook a quality initiative reducing frame rate from 10 frames per second (FPS) to 5 FPS. To assess whether lowering frame rate can reduce radiation exposure without compromising safety, data on EMBs from 9/2009 to 4/2013 without angiography or intervention were reviewed. Effective dose was calculated from dose area product (DAP) and fluoroscopy time. Complications were reviewed. Independent t test compared pre- and post-data and a general linear model were used to control for confounders. Paired t test of most proximate data was used for pts with EMB before and after our change. Eighty-six patients had 543 EMB. After adjusting for weight, attending, and presence of a fellow, the lower FPS group had a 60.3% reduction in DAP (p < 0.0001) and 53.8% drop in effective dose (p < 0.0001). Fluoroscopy time did not differ. Twenty-eight pts had EMBs both before and after the FPS change. Pair-wise analysis of this group demonstrated a 33% reduction in DAP (p < 0.05) and 37% drop in effective dose (p < 0.01), without difference in fluoroscopy time. No patient had an increase in TR > 1 grade by ECHO. There were no deaths or perforations. Lowering the frame rate reduces radiation exposure by >50% without compromising safety. Efforts to further minimize radiation exposure of this vulnerable population should be considered.

Cancer Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients With Previous Neoplasia History

Neoplasm history increases morbidity and mortality after solid organ transplantation and has disqualified patients from transplantation. Studies are needed to identify factors to be considered when deciding on the suitability of a patient with previous tumor for heart transplantation. A retrospective epidemiological study was conducted in heart transplant (HT) recipients (Spanish Post-Heart Transplant Tumor Registry) comparing the epidemiological data, immu-nosuppressive treatments and incidence of post-HT tumors between patients with previous malignant noncardiac tumor and with no previous tumor (NPT). The impact of previous tumor (PT) on overall survival (OS) was also assessed. A total of 4561 patients, 77 PT and 4484 NPT, were evaluated. The NPT group had a higher proportion of men than the PT group (p < 0.001). The incidence of post-HT tumors was 1.8 times greater in the PT group (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.2-2.6; p < 0.001), mainly due to the increased risk in patients with a previous hematologic tumor (rate ratio 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-4.0, p < 0.004). OS during the 10-year posttransplant period was significantly lower in the PT than the NPT group (p = 0.048) but similar when the analysis was conducted after a first post-HT tumor was diagnosed. In conclusion, a history of PT increases the incidence of post-HT tumors and should be taken into account when considering a patient for HT.

Heart Transplantation in the Short Term After Chemotherapy

Anthracycline antibiotics are an effective therapy for a variety of neoplastic diseases. Dilated cardiomyopathy is a known risk of their use. Because of the risk of new or recurrent neoplasm with immunosuppression transplantation is often delayed. Our patient developed early cardiomyopathy with congestive heart failure 3 months after completion of chemotherapy. Given the severity of her cardiac symptoms the decision was made to proceed with heart transplantation in the short term after completion of her chemotherapy. We report the success to 1 year of this decision and discuss the implications of her genetic and oncologic diagnoses in this clinical scenario.

Terminal heart failure: who should be transplanted and who should have mechanical circulatory support?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Permanent long-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) is currently reserved for patients who are transplant ineligible. In light of improved outcomes with current continuous flow devices, increased interest has focused on the potential extension of MCS therapy to ambulatory advanced heart failure patients and as an alternative to cardiac transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Average 1-year and 2-year survival with heart transplantation is about 85 and 80%, and with MCS therapy, it is 85 and 70% (with censoring at transplant). Specific subsets of destination therapy patients enjoy survival out to 2 years, which is comparable with transplant survival. Risk factor analyses identify similar risk profiles for each therapy. Life satisfaction after each is highly dependent on the frequency and severity of adverse events, which are quite different for these interventions. Patients with long expected waiting times will likely be the initial group for triage off the transplant wait list to MCS therapy.

SUMMARY

MCS has progressively improved and may become a reasonable alternative to transplantation for highly selected patients with long expected waiting time. More routine extension of MCS therapy to the transplant population awaits further reduction of major adverse events, miniaturized devices, and less invasive implant techniques.