Pulmonary endarterectomy in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: realising the potential of multimodal management

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare complication of acute pulmonary embolism. Important advances have enabled better understanding, characterisation, and treatment of this condition. Guidelines recommending systematic follow-up after acute pulmonary embolism, and the insight that CTEPH can mimic acute pulmonary embolism on initial presentation, have led to the definition of CTEPH imaging characteristics, the introduction of artificial intelligence diagnosis pathways, and thus the prospect of easier and earlier CTEPH diagnosis. In this Series paper, we show how the understanding of CTEPH as a sequela of inflammatory thrombosis has driven successful multidisciplinary management that integrates surgical, interventional, and medical treatments. We provide imaging examples of classical major vessel targets, describe microvascular targets, define available tools, and depict an algorithm facilitating the initial treatment strategy in people with newly diagnosed CTEPH based on a multidisciplinary team discussion at a CTEPH centre. Further work is needed to optimise the use and combination of multimodal therapeutic options in CTEPH to improve long-term outcomes for patients.

Impact of residual pulmonary hypertension on long-term outcomes after pulmonary endarterectomy in the modern era

Residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) negatively impacts long-term results following pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). We sought to reveal whether modern PH therapy with PH-targeted medicine and balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) improved long-term results of residual PH after PEA. Long-term findings of 80 patients who survived PEA between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively investigated. One month after PEA, 30 patients developed residual PH defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25 mmHg, of whom 23 were treated by PH-targeted medicine and 9 by BPA. Patients with residual PH acquired considerably better functional status and exercise capacity after PEA, however, exhibited significantly worse survival rates than those without. Eleven patients died during follow-up: 8 patients with residual PH and 3 controls. Among patients with residual PH, the deceased had a significantly lower %decrease in mPAP from 1 month to 1 year following PEA (7.4 [-32.6 to 8.0] % vs. 10.4 [3.7-27.8] %, p = 0.03) and higher mPAP at 1 year following PEA (39.5 [33.25-42.5] vs. 27 [26-34] mmHg, p < 0.01) despite PH-targeted medicine than the survived. No patients passed away from right heart failure, and there was no difference between the groups in CTEPH-related mortality. Modern PH therapy was used to address the majority of residual PH. Long-term survival after PEA was negatively impacted by residual PH, but it appeared that long-term mortality was also correlated with unrelieved residual PH despite PH-targeted medicine. Modern PH therapy may have enhanced functional status and excercise capacity, and averted fatal right heart failure.

Right-to-left ventricle ratio determined by machine learning algorithms on CT pulmonary angiography images predicts prolonged ICU length of stay in operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Right-to-left ventricle diameter ratio (dRV/dLV) on CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is a predictor of outcomes in non-operated chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) patients. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel machine learning (ML) algorithm for dRV/dLV measurement in operated CTEPH patients and its association with post-operative outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective study reviewed consecutive CTEPH patients who underwent pulmonary endarterectomy between 2013 and 2017. ML calculated dRV/dLV on pre-operative CTPA and compared with manual measures. Associations of dRV/dLV with patient characteristics and post-operative outcomes were evaluated including intensive care (ICU) and hospital length of stay (LOS) using multivariable linear regression analysis. Prolonged LOS was defined as greater than median.

RESULTS

ML segmented the ventricles in 99/125 (79%) patients. The most common cause of failure was misidentification of the moderator band as the interventricular septum (7.9%). Mean dRV/dLV by ML was 1.4 ± 0.4 and strongly correlated with manual measures (r = 0.9-0.96 p < 0.0001). dRV/dLV was moderately correlated with measures of pulmonary hypertension on right heart catheterization and RV dilatation on echocardiogram (r = 0.5-0.6, p < 0.0001). dRV/dLV ≥ 1.2 was associated with proximal Jamieson type disease (p = 0.032), longer cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.037), aortic cross-clamp (p = 0.022) and circulatory arrest (p < 0.001) at surgery and dRV/dLV ≥ 1.6 with post-operative ECMO (p = 0.006). dRV/dLV was independently associated with prolonged ICU LOS (OR = 3.79, 95% CI 1.1-13.06, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

dRV/dLV was associated with CTEPH severity and independently associated with prolonged ICU LOS. This CT parameter may therefore assist in perioperative planning. Further refinement of the ML algorithm or CTPA technique is required to avoid errors in ventricular segmentation.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Automated right-to-left ventricle ratio measurement by machine learning is feasible and is independently associated with outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy.

Right ventricle remodeling in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is an underdiagnosed, but potentially curable pulmonary vascular disease. The increased pulmonary vascular resistance in CTEPH is caused by unresolved proximal thrombus and secondary microvasculopathy in the pulmonary vasculature, leading to adaptive and maladaptive remodeling of the right ventricle (RV), eventual right heart failure, and death. Knowledge on the RV remodeling process in CTEPH is limited. The progression to RV failure in CTEPH is a markedly slower process. A detailed understanding of the pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms of RV remodeling may facilitate early diagnosis and the development of targeted therapy. While ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, right heart catheterization, and serum biomarkers have been used to assess cardiac function, the current treatment strategies reduce the afterload of the right heart, but are less effective in improving the maladaptive remodeling of the right heart. This review systematically summarizes the current knowledge on adaptive and maladaptive remodeling of the right heart in CTEPH from molecular mechanisms to clinical practice.

Pulmonary endarterectomy in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: the Toronto experience

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) in severe chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is associated with higher risks. However, recent evidence suggests that these risks may be mitigated with the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 401 consecutive patients undergoing PEA at the Toronto General Hospital between August 2005 and March 2020. Patients with severe CTEPH defined by pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 at the time of diagnosis were compared to those with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm-5.

RESULTS

The New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and 6-minute walk distance were worse in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5. A greater proportion of patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 was treated with targeted pulmonary hypertension (PH) medical therapy (38% vs. 18%, P<0.001) and initiated on inotropic support (7% vs. 0.3%, P<0.001) before PEA. Since 2014, the ECMO utilization rate increased in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 compared to those with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 (18% vs. 3.1%, P<0.001). The hospital mortality in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 decreased from 10.3% in 2005-2013 to 1.6% in 2014-2020 (P=0.05), while the hospital mortality in patients with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 remained stable (1.2% in 2005-2013 vs. 2.7% in 2014-2020, P=0.4). The overall survival reached 84% at 10 years in patients with PVR >1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 compared to 78% in patients with PVR <1,000 dynes.s.cm-5 (P=0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

The early and long-term results of PEA in patients with severe CTEPH are excellent despite greater postoperative risks. ECMO as a bridge to recovery after PEA can be useful in patients with severe CTEPH.

Epidemiology of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in the Czech Republic

This study investigated the epidemiology and survival outcomes of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) in the Czech Republic, wherein pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) surgery was the only targeted treatment option until 2015. This study included all consecutive adults newly diagnosed with CTEPH in the Czech Republic between 2003 and 2016. Incidence/prevalence rates were calculated using general population data extracted from the Institute of Health Information and Statistics of the Czech Republic. Kaplan–Meier estimates of survival from diagnosis until 2018 were calculated. Of a total of 453 patients observed, 236 (52.1%) underwent PEA (median time from diagnosis to PEA: 2.9 months) and 71 (34.1%) had residual pulmonary hypertension (PH) post‐PEA. CTEPH incidence rate (95% confidence interval [CI]) between 2006 and 2016 was 4.47 (4.05; 4.91) patients per million (ppm) per year, and the prevalence (95% CI) was 37.43 (33.46; 41.73) ppm in 2016. The rate of CTEPH‐related hospitalizations (95% CI) per 100 person‐years was 24.4 (22.1; 26.9) for operated patients and 34.2 (30.9; 37.7) for not‐operated patients. Median overall survival (95% CI) for all patients from CTEPH diagnosis was 11.2 (9.4; not reached) years. Five‐year survival probability (95% CI) was 95.3% (89.9; 97.9) for operated patients without residual PH, 86.3% (75.3; 92.7) for operated patients with residual PH and 61.2% (54.0; 67.6) for not‐operated patients. This study reported epidemiological estimates of CTEPH in the Czech Republic consistent with estimates from other national systematic registries; and indicates an unmet medical need in not‐operated patients and operated patients with residual PH.

Evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension - consensus statement from the ISHLT

ISHLT members have recognized the importance of a consensus statement on the evaluation and management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. The creation of this document required multiple steps, including the engagement of the ISHLT councils, approval by the Standards and Guidelines Committee, identification and selection of experts in the field, and the development of 6 working groups. Each working group provided a separate section based on an extensive literature search. These sections were then coalesced into a single document that was circulated to all members of the working groups. Key points were summarized at the end of each section. Due to the limited number of comparative trials in this field, the document was written as a literature review with expert opinion rather than based on level of evidence.

What's new in pulmonary hypertension clinical research: lessons from the best abstracts at the 2020 American Thoracic Society International Conference

In this conference paper, we review the 2020 American Thoracic Society International Conference session titled, "What's New in Pulmonary Hypertension Clinical Research: Lessons from the Best Abstracts". This virtual mini-symposium took place on 21 October 2020, in lieu of the annual in-person ATS International Conference which was cancelled due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Seven clinical research abstracts were selected for presentation in the session, which encompassed five major themes: (1) standardizing diagnosis and management of pulmonary hypertension, (2) improving risk assessment in pulmonary arterial hypertension, (3) evaluating biomarkers of disease activity, (4) understanding metabolic dysregulation across the spectrum of pulmonary hypertension, and (5) advancing knowledge in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Focusing on these five thematic contexts, we review the current state of knowledge, summarize presented research abstracts, appraise their significance and limitations, and then discuss relevant future directions in pulmonary hypertension clinical research.

In-Depth Analysis of a Case of Persistent Severe Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a disease characterized by an increase in the pulmonary vascular resistance that typically progresses to right heart failure and death. It is classified into five groups. Management depends on the group classification. Group four PH, chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is thought to be a result of acute pulmonary emboli that cause fibrosis and scarring of the pulmonary arteries with consequent obstruction. The diagnosis of CTEPH is made by identifying perfusion abnormalities on ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) scan. Other studies required for the diagnostic evaluation include transthoracic echocardiogram, right heart catheterization, NT pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and thrombophilia evaluation. Several other tests needed to exclude other causes of pulmonary hypertension include high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), connective tissue disease evaluation, thyroid function testing, human immunodeficiency virus testing, and liver ultrasonography to exclude portal hypertension. The treatment for CTEPH is surgical pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). In patients who are not candidates or decline PEA, pulmonary balloon angioplasty may be useful, however, further studies are required. Several pulmonary artery hypertension medications have been studied in the management of inoperable CTEPH or persistent PH following PEA including bosentan (improves hemodynamics but not exercise capacity), macitentan (improves both hemodynamics and clinical parameters), and riociguat (improves both hemodynamics and exercise capacity). However, only riociguat is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for this indication.

Balloon pulmonary angioplasty vs. pulmonary endarterectomy in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Although balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) and pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) are effective in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), the comparison of their efficacy and safety is still unclear. We identified studies through a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase and used a random effects meta-analysis model to synthesize estimates of weighted mean differences or combined effect size. In total, 54 studies were included in this meta-analysis. The survival rates at perioperative/in-hospital period, 2 years, and 3 years were 100%, 99%, and 97%, respectively, in BPA group and 93%, 90%, and 88%, respectively, in PEA group. The variation of 6-min walk distance was 141.80 m in BPA and 100.73 m in PEA when the follow-up was 1-6 months. At < 1-month, 1-6-month, and > 12-month follow-up, the changed results of mean pulmonary arterial pressure were - 18.31, - 17.00, and - 12.97 mmHg in BPA group and - 18.93, - 21.21, and - 21.35 mmHg in PEA group. At < 1-month and 1-6-month follow-up, the changed values of pulmonary vascular resistance were - 542.24 and - 599.77 dyne•s•cm^-5 in PEA group and - 443.49 and - 280.00 dyne•s•cm^-5 in BPA group. In addition, there was more wide variety of complications in PEA group than in BPA group. BPA might have higher survival rate (perioperative/in-hospital period, 2-year and 3-year follow-up) and fewer types of complications compared with PEA. The improvement in exercise capacity (1-6-month follow-up) in the BPA group might be more pronounced than in PEA group. Moreover, PEA might be superior in improvement of hemodynamic parameters (< 1-month, 1-6-month, and > 12-month follow-up).

Importance of computed tomography in defining segmental disease in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

Background

Radiological assessment of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is critical to decide whether patients should be treated with pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). Although computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is increasingly used for decision making in CTEPH, the value of CTPA to predict surgical findings and outcome has never been explored.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 100 consecutive patients with high-quality CTPA undergoing PEA for CTEPH between May 2015 and December 2017. The most proximal level of disease in the pulmonary artery on CTPA was classified by two blinded radiologists as level 1 (main pulmonary artery), 2a (lobar pulmonary artery), 2b (origin of basal segmental pulmonary artery), 3 (segmental pulmonary artery) or 4 (predominantly subsegmental pulmonary artery).

Results

CTPA demonstrated level 1 in 20%, level 2a in 43%, level 2b in 11%, level 3 in 23% and level 4 in 3%. A majority of males presented with level 1 (55%) and level 2 (57%), and a majority of females (83%) with level 3 (p=0.01). Levels 3 and 4 were associated with longer duration of circulatory arrest (p=0.03) and higher frequency of Jamieson type III disease at surgery (p<0.0001). Requirement for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy after PEA was 28% at 3 years in level 2b/3/4 compared with 6% in level 2a and 13% in level 1 (p=0.002). Level 2b/3/4 was an independent predictor for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy after PEA (hazard ratio 4.23, 95% CI 1.24-14.39; p=0.02).

Conclusions

High-quality CTPA provides accurate evaluation of CTEPH patients. The level of disease on CTPA can help guide peri-operative planning and post-operative monitoring.

Surgical and Percutaneous Interventions for Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

The treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension has expanded considerably. The ability to endarterectomize chronic thromboembolic material, the availability of pulmonary hypertension medical therapy to treat inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and/or residual pulmonary hypertension, and the rebirth of pulmonary balloon angioplasty have changed the management landscape. Patient selection requires a multidisciplinary evaluation at an experienced center. What is inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension to one group may be operable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension to another. The ultimate challenge then becomes which intervention provides the optimal long-term outcome for any individual patient.

Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: An Update

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a progressive pulmonary vascular disease with significant morbidity. It is a result of an alternate natural history in which there is limited resolution of thromboemboli with pulmonary artery obstruction leading to pulmonary hypertension (PH). CTEPH requires a thorough clinical assessment including pulmonary hemodynamics and radiologic evaluation in addition to consultation with an expert center. Surgical intervention remains the optimal management strategy. Select patients may be candidates for catheter-based intervention with balloon pulmonary angioplasty in centers with clinical expertise. Inoperable patients or those with post-intervention PH are treated with pulmonary hypertension-targeted medical therapy.

Perfusion strategy and mid-term results of 58 consecutive pulmonary endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this retrospective study was to review and report short-term and mid-term outcomes of pulmonary endarterectomy for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension at our institute in the recent 2 years and to describe perfusion strategy.

METHODS

A total of 58 consecutive patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension underwent pulmonary endarterectomy under deep hypothermia circulatory arrest with an established perfusion practice between November 2015 and December 2017. Peri-operative data and patients' outcome were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Mean pulmonary artery pressure was decreased (49 (40-56) mmHg vs 27 (20-31) mmHg, p < 0.001), and pulmonary vascular resistance (724 (538-1108) vs 206 (141-284) dyn second cm^-5, p < 0.001) improved significantly after surgery. In-hospital mortality was 1.7% and postoperative complication rate was 27.6%. Antipsychotic medication of olanzapine was prescribed for 36 patients (62.1%), which was independently related to total deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time, postoperative blood potassium concentration, and hematocrit. The majority of patients recovered uneventfully with good mid-term cardiac function (New York Heart Association I-II: 98.1%) and neurological outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Upper Good Recovery: 74.1% and Lower Good Recovery: 20.3%). Mid-term neurological outcome was associated with post-pulmonary endarterectomy antipsychotic medication.

CONCLUSION

Short-term and mid-term outcome after pulmonary endarterectomy was comparable to high-volume centers. Incidence of post-pulmonary endarterectomy delirium was relatively high and associated with mid-term neurological outcome. Total deep hypothermic circulatory arrest time, postoperative blood potassium concentration, and hematocrit were independent risk factors of postoperative olanzapine medication. More efforts and further research are required to optimize the neuroprotection of perfusion practice.

Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension: New Horizons in the Interventional Management of Pulmonary Embolism

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is an underdiagnosed potential complication of acute or recurrent pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Multiple studies suggest that up to 5% of patients with acute pulmonary thromboembolic disease go on to develop CTEPH. The prognosis of untreated CTEPH is poor, but advances in medical and surgical treatments over the past few decades have improved patient outcomes. The gold standard and curative treatment for CTEPH is pulmonary endarterectomy; however, some patients are inoperable and others who have undergone pulmonary endarterectomy experience persistent or recurrent pulmonary hypertension despite medical therapy. In recent years, balloon pulmonary angioplasty has emerged as a primary and adjunctive treatment for these CTEPH patients at expert or specialized centers. This review outlines an approach to balloon pulmonary angioplasty for CTEPH, including clinical presentation and evaluation; patient selection and indications; treatment planning; equipment and technique; overcoming technical challenges; recognition and management of complications; postprocedural care and clinical follow-up; and expected outcomes.

Midterm Effect of Balloon Pulmonary Angioplasty on Hemodynamics and Subclinical Myocardial Damage in Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

The acute favourable effect of balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has been proven in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). However, data on its effect 6 months after therapy (from now on referred to as mid-term) and influence on the right ventricle and myocardial damage are sparse. To evaluate factors that influence improvement in cardiac output (CO) and subclinical myocardial damage, we examined hemodynamics and serum high-sensitivity troponin T (hs-TnT) levels before, 1 week after, and 6 months after BPA.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, we reviewed 67 consecutive patients from November 2012 to January 2016 with CTEPH who had undergone BPA at Keio University Hospital.

RESULTS

Six months after BPA, the mean right atrium pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), and hs-TnT levels decreased; CO and 6-minute walking distance increased. Changes in CO and hs-TnT levels varied compared with other hemodynamic parameters and BNP levels. The CO-increase group (n = 42) had higher mean PAP and PVR, and lower CO at baseline than the CO-decrease/stable group (n = 25). The hs-TnT-decrease group (n = 36) had higher mean right atrium pressure, PAP, PVR, and BNP levels, and lower CO at baseline than the hs-TnT-increase/stable group (n = 31).

CONCLUSIONS

Six months after BPA, hemodynamics and exercise capacity improved and hs-TnT levels decreased. Improvements in CO and hs-TnT levels were more prominent in CTEPH patients with impaired baseline hemodynamics, suggesting that BPA has a favourable mid-term effect on hemodynamics and subclinical myocardial damage in patients with CTEPH, especially in those with impaired hemodynamics.

An Update on the Management of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare but life-threatening form of pulmonary artery hypertension that is defined as a mean arterial pulmonary pressure greater than 25mmHg that persists for more than 6 months following anticoagulation therapy in the setting of pulmonary emboli. CTEPH is categorized by the World Health Organization as group IV pulmonary hypertension and is thought to be due to unresolved thromboemboli in the pulmonary artery circulation. Among the 5 classes of pulmonary hypertension, CTEPH is unique in that it is potentially curable with the use of pulmonary thromboendarterectomy surgery. Despite an increasing array of medical and surgical treatment options for patients with CTEPH over the past 2 decades, patients commonly present with advanced disease and carry a poor prognosis, thus, the need for early diagnosis and appropriate referral to an expert center. This review article first highlights the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and clinical presentation of CTEPH. The article then provides diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for the management of the patient with suspected CTEPH.

Role of extracorporeal life support after pulmonary endarterectomy: a single-centre experience

OBJECTIVES

Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) for rescue after pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) has become a viable option. This study aims to present a single-centre experience looking at the indications and outcome of ECLS after PEA.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing PEA from January 2008 to January 2015 in our institution.

RESULTS

Among 144 consecutive patients undergoing PEA for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension, 6 (4%) received ECLS postoperatively for right ventricular (RV) failure (n = 3), severe hypoxaemia (n = 2) and haemorrhagic pulmonary oedema (n = 1). ECLS configuration was central veno-arterial (cVA) in 3 patients, peripheral VA (pVA) in 1 and veno-venous (VV) in 2. One patient with cVA was switched to VV after 5 days. Overall ECLS duration ranged between 3 and 39 (median 5) days. ECLS patients had higher preoperative total pulmonary vascular resistance (TPR) compared with non-ECLS patients (1477 ± 671 vs 954 ± 462 Dynes.s.cm(-5), P = 0.009) and more frequently required hospital admission for RV failure before surgery (50 vs 9%, P = 0.02). The overall in-hospital mortality rate for all patients was 2% (3/144), including one ECLS patient on pVA. The remaining 5 ECLS patients (83%) were discharged from the hospital and are alive after a median follow-up of 11 (range 6-27) months. Two ECLS patients (40%) are on therapy for residual PH compared with 13 (10%) in the non-ECLS patients (P = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

ECLS is a safe and important rescue option after PEA. The use of ECLS may expand eligibility for PEA by allowing sicker patients to undergo surgery.

Combined pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is a curative treatment option for more than 60% of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). For selected inoperable patients, interventional balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) has recently been established in addition to medical treatment. This approach disrupts scar tissue occluding the pulmonary arteries, leading to an improvement in parenchymal perfusion. CTEPH is occasionally heterogeneous, with operable disease on one side but peripheral, inoperable changes on the contralateral side. Performing unilateral PEA (on the operable side only) in these patients may lead to a worse hemodynamic outcome and increased mortality compared with patients who that can be surgically corrected bilaterally. We sought to determine the feasibility, safety, and benefits of BPA applied to the contralateral lung in several patients with predominantly unilateral disease that was amenable to treatment by PEA.

METHODS

Standard unilateral PEA in deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was performed in 3 CTEPH patients with poor pulmonary hemodynamics, and inoperability of the contralateral pulmonary artery obstructions was confirmed. The inoperable side was treated by BPA. The intervention was performed during the rewarming phase of cardiopulmonary bypass.

RESULTS

A dramatic improvement in pulmonary hemodynamics, with a mean reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance of 842 dyne · sec/cm(5), was achieved in all patients. World Health Organization Functional Class was also significantly improved at the midterm follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of surgical PEA and interventional BPA is a new treatment option for highly selected high-risk CTEPH patients. A multidisciplinary CTEPH expert team is a basic pre-requisite for this complex concept.