Kidney transplantation as a therapeutic option for end-stage renal disease developing after heart transplantation

High Rate of Kidney Graft Failure after Simultaneous Heart-Kidney Transplantation

Key Points

Simultaneous heart–kidney transplant is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure which are worse when compared with kidney transplant alone. The major causes of kidney graft failure in simultaneous heart–kidney transplant recipients were patient death and primary nonfunction of kidney graft.

Background

The indications and outcomes of simultaneous heart–kidney transplantation (SHKT) remain suboptimally defined. Risk factors for renal graft failure after SHKT also remain poorly defined.

Methods

We analyzed the renal graft outcomes among SHKT recipients using United Network for Organ Sharing database from 2015 to 2020. To evaluate for factors associated with poor renal outcomes, we compared SHKT and kidney transplantation alone recipients using propensity score matching.

Results

Among SHKT recipients, the rate of primary nonfunction (PNF) of kidney graft was 3%, the 30-day kidney graft failure rate was 7.0%, and the 30-day post-transplant mortality rate was 4.1%. The incidence of kidney delayed graft function was 27.5%. Kidney graft failure was seen early post-SHKT with most common causes of patient death (43.9%) and PNF of kidney graft (41.5%). One- and 2-year patient survival was 89.2% and 86.5%, and 1- and 2-year freedom from kidney graft failure was 85.4% and 82.7%, respectively. In subgroup analysis of SHKT recipients, use of pretransplant mechanical cardiac support (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.57; P = 0.017), higher calculated panel reactive antibody (aOR, 1.76; P = 0.016), and older donor age per 10 years (aOR, 1.94; P = 0.001) were associated with PNF. Pretransplant extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was associated with the increased risk of 30-day recipient mortality (aOR, 5.55; P = 0.002). Increased 30-day graft failure was seen in SHKT recipients with pretransplant mechanical cardiac support (aOR, 1.77; P = 0.038) and dialysis at the time of transplant (aOR, 1.72; P = 0.044). Multivariable Cox hazard analysis demonstrated that SHKT, when compared with kidney transplantation alone, is associated with increased kidney graft failure (hazard ratio, 2.56; P < 0.001) and recipient mortality (hazard ratio, 2.65; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SHKT is associated with high rates of kidney graft failure. Identification of risk factors of renal graft failure can help optimize recipient selection for SHKT versus kidney after heart transplantation, especially after introduction of the new safety-net policy.

Simultaneous Heart-kidney Transplant With Planned Delayed Implantation of the Kidney Graft After Ex Vivo Perfusion

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplant (SHK) is an established option for patients with severe heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Recent studies in simultaneous liver-kidney transplantation demonstrate favorable outcomes achieved by delaying implantation of the kidney for over 24 h. This report describes a case series of consecutive patients listed for SHK who had planned delayed implantation of the kidney graft.

METHODS

This case series represents a retrospective analysis of SHK patients extracted from the transplant database at a single center.

RESULTS

There were 7 patients who underwent SHK during the study period. In all cases, kidney grafts were maintained on hypothermic ex vivo pulsatile perfusion for delayed implantation (mean cold ischemia 53 h [range, 31-69]). The first 5 patients had 100% 1-y heart and kidney graft survival with good function. Patient 6 was unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation post-heart transplant. The kidney was implanted at 69 h, and the patient died soon thereafter. Patient 7 was also unstable on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after heart transplant. The decision was made to implant the kidney into a backup kidney recipient. The heart transplant recipient subsequently died several days later, whereas the kidney was successfully transplanted in the alternate candidate.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series highlights the potential utility of delayed kidney implantation in SHK patients. SHK with delayed renal transplant may provide an improved physiologic environment for renal transplant, which may result in improved early renal graft function. Delayed kidney transplant also provides the opportunity to transplant the kidney graft into an alternate candidate.

Renal Dysfunction After Heart Transplant

BACKGROUND

Moderate or severe renal dysfunction (MSRD) is a frequent complication after heart transplantation. Strategies to delay progression and improve outcomes, such as renoprotective medications and timely referral to nephrology, remain important in providing care to heart transplant recipients with MSRD.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are chronic renal dysfunction's prevalence, risk factors, and optimal clinical management strategies in heart transplant recipients?

DESIGN

This single-center, cross-sectional study examined patients who received a heart transplant from January 1, 2000, to June 30, 2011, and followed until December 31, 2011. Moderate or severe renal dysfunction was defined as a glomerular filtration rate of <60 mL/min/1.73 m2.

RESULTS

The prevalence of MSRD among 195 heart transplant recipients was 60%. Variables associated with MSRD were female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 4.82; 95% CI, 1.72-13.54), greater age (OR: 1.10 per year; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14), time since transplant (OR: 1.0004 per year; 95% CI, 1.0001-1.0007), and mTOR inhibitor use (OR: 2.89; 95% CI, 1.24-6.71). Tacrolimus use (OR: 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.71) and cyclosporine use (OR: 0.21; 95% CI, 0.05-0.80) were associated with patients without MSRD. Among patients with MSRD, 19.6% were referred to a nephrologist. Median eGFR remained stable at approximately 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 for 3 years after the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that female sex, older age at transplant, and time since transplant are associated with MSRD in heart transplant recipients. Tacrolimus and cyclosporine use seemed renoprotective, but lower usage and increased mTOR inhibitor use may more likely indicate existing treatment patterns for patients with MSRD.

Dual-Organ Transplantation: Indications, Evaluation, and Outcomes for Heart-Kidney and Heart-Liver Transplantation: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

Although heart transplantation is the preferred therapy for appropriate patients with advanced heart failure, the presence of concomitant renal or hepatic dysfunction can pose a barrier to isolated heart transplantation. Because donor organ supply limits the availability of organ transplantation, appropriate allocation of this scarce resource is essential; thus, clear guidance for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation is urgently required. The purposes of this scientific statement are (1) to describe the impact of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction on posttransplantation outcomes; (2) to discuss the assessment of pretransplantation renal and hepatic dysfunction; (3) to provide an approach to patient selection for simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation and simultaneous heart-liver transplantation and posttransplantation management; and (4) to explore the ethics of multiorgan transplantation.

Outcomes of Simultaneous Heart and Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Simultaneous heart-kidney transplantation has been increasingly performed in end-stage heart failure patients with concurrent kidney dysfunction despite limited evidence supporting its indications and utility.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects and utility of simultaneously implanted kidney allografts with various degrees of kidney dysfunction during heart transplantation.

METHODS

Using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, long-term mortality was compared in recipients with kidney dysfunction who underwent heart-kidney transplantation (n = 1,124) vs isolated heart transplantation (n = 12,415) in the United States between 2005 and 2018. In heart-kidney recipients, contralateral kidney recipients were compared for allograft loss. Multivariable Cox regression was used for risk adjustment.

RESULTS

Long-term mortality was lower among heart-kidney recipients than among heart-alone recipients when recipients were on dialysis (26.7% vs 38.6% at 5 years; HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89) or had a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <30 mL/min/1.73 m² (19.3% vs 32.4%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.46-0.82) and GFR of 30 to 45 mL/min/1.73 m² (16.2% vs 24.3%; HR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.48-0.97) but not in GFR of 45 to 60 mL/min/1.73 m². Interaction analysis showed that the mortality benefit of heart-kidney transplantation continued up to GFR 40 mL/min/1.73 m². The incidence of kidney allograft loss was higher among heart-kidney recipients than among contralateral kidney recipients (14.7% vs 4.5% at 1 year; HR: 1.7; 95% CI: 1.4-2.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Heart-kidney transplantation relative to heart transplantation alone provided superior survival for dialysis-dependent recipients and non-dialysis-dependent recipients up to a GFR of approximately 40 mL/min/1.73 m² but at the cost of almost twice the risk of kidney allograft loss than contralateral kidney allograft recipients.

Combined Heart-Kidney Transplantation: Indications, Outcomes, and Controversies

Renal dysfunction, a prevalent comorbidity in advanced heart failure, is associated with significant morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. In the recent era, the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation has experienced great success in the treatment of both renal and cardiac dysfunction in end-stage disease states, and the number of transplants has increased dramatically. In this review, we discuss appropriate indications and selection criteria, overall and organ-specific outcomes, and future perspectives in the field of combined heart-kidney transplantation.

Kidney Disease After Nonkidney Solid Organ Transplant

Nonkidney solid organ transplants (NKSOTs) are increasing in the United States with improving long-term allograft and patient survival. CKD is prevalent in patients with NKSOT and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality especially in those who progress to end-stage kidney disease. Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity is a main contributor to CKD after NKSOT, but other factors in the pretransplant, peritransplant, and post-transplant period can predispose to progressive kidney dysfunction. The management of CKD after NKSOT generally follows society guidelines for native kidney disease. Kidney-protective and calcineurin inhibitor-sparing immunosuppression has been explored in this population and warrants a discussion with transplant teams. Kidney transplantation in NKSOT recipients remains the kidney replacement therapy of choice for suitable candidates, as it provides a survival benefit over remaining on dialysis.

Heart and kidney transplant: should they be combined or subsequent?

AIMS

End-stage heart failure patients often present with severe kidney failure and have limited treatment options. We compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes among end-stage heart and kidney failure patients who underwent combined heart and kidney transplant (HKTx) with those who underwent kidney transplant after heart transplant (KAH).

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients from 2007-2016 who underwent combined HKTx (n = 715) and those who underwent KAH (n = 130) using the United Network for Organ Sharing database were included. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models compared survivals and identified predictors of death. Number of combined HKTx performed annually in United States increased from 59 in 2007 to 146 in 2016 whereas KAH decreased from 34 in 2007 to 6 in 2016. Among KAH patients, average wait time for kidney transplant was 3.0 years, time to dialysis or to kidney transplant after heart transplant did not differ with varying severity of kidney disease at baseline (P for both >0.05). Upon follow-up (mean 3.5 ± 2.7 years), 151 patients died. In multivariable models, patients who underwent combined HKTx had 4.7-fold greater risk of death [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.4-9.4) than KAH patients upon follow up. A secondary analysis using calculation of survival only after kidney transplant for KAH patients still conferred higher risk for combined HKTx patients [hazard ratio (HR) 2.6 95% CI 1.33-5.15]. In subgroup analyses after excluding patients on dialysis (HR 3.99 95% CI 1.98-8.04) and analysis after propensity matching for age, gender, and glomerular filtration rate (HR 3.01 95% CI 1.40-6.43) showed similar and significantly higher risk for combined HKTx patients compared with KAH patients. Lastly, these results also remained unchanged after excluding transplant centres who performed only one type of procedure preferentially, i.e. HKTx or KAH (HR 4.70 95% CI 2.35-9.42).

CONCLUSIONS

National registry data show continual increase in combined HKTx performed annually in the United States but inferior survival compared with KAH patients. Differences in patient characteristics or level of kidney dysfunction at baseline do not explain these poor outcomes among HKTx patients compared with KAH patients. Consensus guidelines are greatly needed to identify patients who may benefit more from dual organ transplants.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Experience in 100 Consecutive Patients

Background

Combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) is performed in patients with severe heart failure and advanced renal insufficiency. We analyzed the long‐term survival after HKTx, the influence of age and dialysis status, the rates of cardiac rejection, and the influence of sensitization.

Methods and Results

From June 1992 to December 2016, we performed 100 HKTx procedures. We compared older (≥60 years, n=53) with younger (<60 years, n=47) recipients, and recipients on preoperative dialysis (n=49) and not on dialysis (n=51). We analyzed actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection, acute cellular rejection, and antibody‐mediated rejection, and survival rates by sensitized status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50%, and compared these survival rates with those from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the 2 age groups (35±12.4% and 49±17.3%, ≥60 versus <60 years; P=0.45). There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the dialysis and nondialysis groups (44±13.4% and 37±15.2%, P=0.95). Actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection (acute cellular rejection>0 or antibody‐mediated rejection>0) was 92±2.8% and 84±3.8%, acute cellular rejection (≥2R/3A) 98±1.5% and 94±2.5%, and antibody‐mediated rejection (≥1) 96±2.1% and 93±2.6% at 30 days and 1 year after HKTx. There was no difference in the 5‐year survival among recipients by sensitization status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50% (82±5.9%, 83±10.8%, and 92±8.0%; P=0.55). There was no difference in 15‐year survival after HKTx between the United Network for Organ Sharing database and our center (38±3.2% and 40±10.1%, respectively; P=0.45).

Conclusions

HKTx is safe to perform in patients 60 years and older or younger than 60 years and with or without dialysis dependence, with excellent outcomes. The degree of panel‐reactive antibody sensitization did not appear to affect survival after HKTx.

Incidence of end-stage renal disease after heart transplantation and effect of its treatment on survival

Aims

Many heart transplant recipients will develop end‐stage renal disease in the post‐operative course. The aim of this study was to identify the long‐term incidence of end‐stage renal disease, determine its risk factors, and investigate what subsequent therapy was associated with the best survival.

Methods and results

A retrospective, single‐centre study was performed in all adult heart transplant patients from 1984 to 2016. Risk factors for end‐stage renal disease were analysed by means of multivariable regression analysis and survival by means of Kaplan–Meier. Of 685 heart transplant recipients, 71 were excluded: 64 were under 18 years of age and seven were re‐transplantations. During a median follow‐up of 8.6 years, 121 (19.7%) patients developed end‐stage renal disease: 22 received conservative therapy, 80 were treated with dialysis (46 haemodialysis and 34 peritoneal dialysis), and 19 received a kidney transplant. Development of end‐stage renal disease (examined as a time‐dependent variable) inferred a hazard ratio of 6.45 (95% confidence interval 4.87–8.54, P < 0.001) for mortality. Tacrolimus‐based therapy decreased, and acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy increased the risk for end‐stage renal disease development (hazard ratio 0.40, 95% confidence interval 0.26–0.62, P < 0.001, and hazard ratio 4.18, 95% confidence interval 2.30–7.59, P < 0.001, respectively). Kidney transplantation was associated with the best median survival compared with dialysis or conservative therapy: 6.4 vs. 2.2 vs. 0.3 years (P < 0.0001), respectively, after end‐stage renal disease development.

Conclusions

End‐stage renal disease is a frequent complication after heart transplant and is associated with poor survival. Kidney transplantation resulted in the longest survival of patients with end‐stage renal disease.

Kidney transplantation and cardiomyopathy: Concepts and controversies in clinical decision-making

Increasing comorbidities and an aging population have led to a tremendous increase in the burden of both kidney and cardiac dysfunction. Concomitant cardiomyopathy exposes the patients with kidney disease to further physiological, hemodynamic, and pathologic alterations. Kidney transplantation imposes lesser anesthetic and surgical complexities compared to another solid organ transplant. The surgical decision-making remains an unsettled issue in these conditions. The surgical choices, techniques, and sequences in kidney transplant and cardiac surgery depend on the pathophysiological perturbations and perioperative outcomes. The absence of randomized controlled trials eludes us from suggesting definite management protocol in patients with end-stage kidney disease with cardiomyopathy. Nevertheless, in this review, we extracted data from published literature to understand the pathophysiologic interactions between end-stage renal diseases with cardiomyopathy and also proposed the management algorithm in this challenging scenario. The proposed management algorithm would ensure consensus across all stakeholders involved in decision-making. Our simplistic evidence-based approach would augur future randomized trials and would further ensure refinement in our management approach after the emergence of more definitive evidence.

Genomewide association study reveals novel genetic loci associated with change in renal function in heart transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction occurs commonly after heart transplantation (HTx) with wide inter-individual variability but whether a genetic predisposition exists in these patients is unknown. Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have not been performed to assess the association of genetic variation with change in renal function after HTx.

METHODS

Clinical and demographic data of patients who underwent HTx and provided blood samples and consent for genetic analysis were included. Genotyping was performed using Illumina Infinium Human CoreExome v1.0 analysis kit. A GWAS utilizing linear regression models was performed with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 year as the phenotype after adjusting for baseline eGFR prior to HTx and conversion from calcineurin inhibitor to sirolimus as primary immunosuppression therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 251 HTx recipients were genotyped for 314,903 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). The mean (SD) age was 50 (12.5) years; most patients were of European origin (n = 243, 96.8%) and males (n = 179, 71.3%). After adjustment for potential confounders, two variants, rs17033285 (P = 4.3 × 10^-7 ) and rs4917601 (P = 6.46 × 10^-7 ), in a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) gene LINC01121 and a pseudogene BTBD7P2, were identified to have a significant association with change in GFR at 1 year after HTx.

CONCLUSIONS

Our first of its kind GWAS demonstrates that genetic variation affects renal function after HTx independent of other risk factors. Agnostic genetic approaches such as these may lead to identification of novel biological pathways such as the role of lncRNAs in the development of renal dysfunction post-HTx.

End-stage renal disease after pediatric heart transplantation: A 25-year national cohort study

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD), defined as the need for chronic dialysis and/or kidney transplantation (KTx), is a known complication after heart transplant (HTx). However, factors associated with ESRD are not well elucidated. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes associated with ESRD after pediatric HTx.

METHODS

Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data were linked, using direct identifiers, to the United States Renal Data System to identify patients (aged ≤ 18 years) who underwent primary HTx between 1989 and 2013. Risk factors for ESRD and death were analyzed using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Combining the above 2 databases identified ~25% additional HTx patients who developed ESRD that were not captured by either database alone. During a median follow-up of 11.8 years, ESRD developed in 276 of 6,901 patients (4%). The actuarial risk of developing ESRD after HTx was 3% at 10 years and 16% at 20 years. Age at HTx > 1 year, African-American race, year of HTx before 2000, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, re-HTx, acute dialysis, graft failure, and hospitalized infection were significant risk factors for ESRD development. Those who remained on chronic dialysis had higher risk of death than those who received KTx (hazard ratio, 31.4; 95% confidence interval, 20.8-48.4; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD after pediatric HTx is more prevalent in HTx survivors than documented by a transplant database alone. A number of factors develop at or after HTx that increase the risk for developing ESRD. Use of KTx in post-HTx ESRD is associated with improved survival.