Early aspirin use and the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy

Early Use of Aspirin for Coronary Allograft Prophylaxis in Heart Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation. The use of aspirin for CAV prophylaxis has recently garnered interest as a possible therapeutic adjunct in this setting.

METHODS

This 2-center retrospective cohort study included 372 patients who underwent heart transplantation between January 2009 and March 2018 and were stratified according to the commencement of aspirin during their index transplant admission. The primary outcome was the development of moderate or severe CAV (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation grade ≥2) at surveillance coronary angiography. Secondary endpoints included mortality at follow-up.

RESULTS

There were no differences in age, sex, and cause of heart failure. In the early aspirin group, the preponderant risk factors included use of ventricular assist devices, pretransplant smoking, and mild or moderate rejection. Multivariable analyses to assess for independent predictors of CAV development and mortality demonstrated that aspirin was associated with reduced mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.47, P < 0.01) and a trend toward a protective effect against the development of moderate or severe CAV (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.19; P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective risk-adjusted 2-center cohort study, early aspirin administration was associated with reduced risk of death and a trend toward a protective effect against CAV development. These findings warrant validation in prospective randomized trials.

Early Immunomodulatory Program Triggered by Protolerogenic Bifidobacterium pseudolongum Drives Cardiac Transplant Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite ongoing improvements to regimens preventing allograft rejection, most cardiac and other organ grafts eventually succumb to chronic vasculopathy, interstitial fibrosis, or endothelial changes, and eventually graft failure. The events leading to chronic rejection are still poorly understood and the gut microbiota is a known driving force in immune dysfunction. We previously showed that gut microbiota dysbiosis profoundly influences the outcome of vascularized cardiac allografts and subsequently identified biomarker species associated with these differential graft outcomes.

METHODS

In this study, we further detailed the multifaceted immunomodulatory properties of protolerogenic and proinflammatory bacterial species over time, using our clinically relevant model of allogenic heart transplantation.

RESULTS

In addition to tracing longitudinal changes in the recipient gut microbiome over time, we observed that Bifidobacterium pseudolongum induced an early anti-inflammatory phenotype within 7 d, whereas Desulfovibrio desulfuricans resulted in a proinflammatory phenotype, defined by alterations in leukocyte distribution and lymph node (LN) structure. Indeed, in vitro results showed that B pseudolongum and D desulfuricans acted directly on primary innate immune cells. However, by 40 d after treatment, these 2 bacterial strains were associated with mixed effects in their impact on LN architecture and immune cell composition and loss of colonization within gut microbiota, despite protection of allografts from inflammation with B pseudolongum treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These dynamic effects suggest a critical role for early microbiota-triggered immunologic events such as innate immune cell engagement, T-cell differentiation, and LN architectural changes in the subsequent modulation of protolerant versus proinflammatory immune responses in organ transplant recipients.

Transplant Vasculopathy Versus Native Atherosclerosis: Similarities and Differences

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is one of the leading causes of graft failure and death after heart transplantation. Alloimmune-dependent and -independent factors trigger the pathogenesis of CAV through activation of the recipients' (and to a lesser extent donor-derived) immune system. Early diagnosis of CAV is complicated by the lack of clinical symptoms for ischemia in the denervated heart, by the impact of early functional coronary alterations, by the insensitivity of coronary angiography, and by the involvement of small intramyocardial vessels. CAV in general is a panarterial disease confined to the allograft and characterized by diffuse concentric longitudinal intimal hyperplasia in the epicardial coronary arteries and concentric medial disease in the microvasculature. Plaque composition in CAV may include early fibrous and fibrofatty tissue and late atheromatous calcification. In contrast, native coronary atherosclerosis usually develops over decades, is focal, noncircumferential, and typically diminishes proximal parts of the epicardial vessels. The rapid and early development of CAV has an adverse prognostic impact, and current prevention and treatment strategies are of limited efficacy compared with established strategies in native atherosclerosis. Following acute coronary syndromes, patients after heart transplantation were more likely to have accompanying cardiogenic shock and higher mortality compared with acute coronary syndromes patients with native hearts.

Acetylsalicylic acid use and development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy: A national prospective study using highly automated 3-D optical coherence tomography analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting evidence on the role of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) use in the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV).

METHODS

A nationwide prospective two-center study investigated changes in the coronary artery vasculature by highly automated 3-D optical coherence tomography (OCT) analysis at 1 month and 12 months after heart transplant (HTx). The influence of ASA use on coronary artery microvascular changes was analyzed in the overall study cohort and after propensity score matching for selected clinical CAV risk factors.

RESULTS

In total, 175 patients (mean age 52 ± 12 years, 79% male) were recruited. During the 1-year follow-up, both intimal and media thickness progressed, with ASA having no effect on its progression. However, detailed OCT analysis revealed that ASA use was associated with a lower increase in lipid plaque (LP) burden (p = .013), while it did not affect the other observed pathologies. Propensity score matching of 120 patients (60 patient pairs) showed similar results, with ASA use associated with lower progression of LPs (p = .002), while having no impact on layered fibrotic plaque (p = .224), calcification (p = .231), macrophage infiltration (p = .197), or the absolute coronary artery risk score (p = .277). According to Kaplan-Meier analysis, ASA use was not associated with a significant difference in survival (p = .699) CONCLUSION: This study showed a benefit of early ASA use after HTx on LP progression. However, ASA use did not have any impact on the progression of other OCT-observed pathologies or long-term survival.

Perioperative Management of Heart Transplantation: A Clinical Review

In this clinical review, the authors summarize the perioperative management of heart transplant patients with a focus on hemodynamics, immunosuppressive strategies, hemostasis and hemorrage, and the prevention and treatment of infectious complications.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease" provides an update to and consolidates new evidence since the "2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease" and the corresponding "2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS Focused Update of the Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from September 2021 to May 2022. Clinical studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, and other evidence conducted on human participants were identified that were published in English from MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline.

STRUCTURE

This guideline provides an evidenced-based and patient-centered approach to management of patients with chronic coronary disease, considering social determinants of health and incorporating the principles of shared decision-making and team-based care. Relevant topics include general approaches to treatment decisions, guideline-directed management and therapy to reduce symptoms and future cardiovascular events, decision-making pertaining to revascularization in patients with chronic coronary disease, recommendations for management in special populations, patient follow-up and monitoring, evidence gaps, and areas in need of future research. Where applicable, and based on availability of cost-effectiveness data, cost-value recommendations are also provided for clinicians. Many recommendations from previously published guidelines have been updated with new evidence, and new recommendations have been created when supported by published data.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin on preventing transplant renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Transplant renal artery stenosis (TRAS) is a vascular complication after kidney transplantation associated with poor outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy and safety of low-dose aspirin for preventing TRAS.

METHODS

After kidney transplantation, patients were enrolled from January 2018 to December 2020 in Henan Provincial People's Hospital. A total of 351 enrolled recipients were randomized to an aspirin group with low-dose intake of aspirin in addition to standard treatment ( n = 178), or a control group with only standard treatment ( n = 173). The patients was initially diagnosed as TRAS (id-TRAS) by Doppler ultrasound, and confirmed cases were diagnosed by DSA (c-TRAS).

RESULTS

In the aspirin and control groups, 15.7% (28/178) and 22.0% (38/173) of the recipients developed id-TRAS, respectively, with no statistical difference. However, for c-TRAS, the difference of incidence and cumulative incidence was statistically significant. The incidence of c-TRAS was lower in the aspirin group compared with the control group (2.8% [5/178] vs. 11.6% [20/173], P = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression model identified the cumulative incidence and hazard ratio (HR) of TRAS over time in two groups, showing that recipients treated with aspirin had a significantly lower risk of c-TRAS than those who were not treated (log-rank P  = 0.001, HR = 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09-0.62). The levels of platelet aggregation rate ( P  < 0.001), cholesterol ( P  = 0.028), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( P  = 0.003) in the aspirin group were decreased compared with the control group in the third-month post-transplantation. For the incidence of adverse events, there was no statistical difference.

CONCLUSION

Clinical application of low-dose aspirin after renal transplant could prevent the development of TRAS with no significant increase in adverse effects.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04260828.

Early aspirin use and the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy in pediatric heart transplant recipients: A pediatric heart transplant society analysis

BACKGROUND

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains a leading cause of graft loss in pediatric heart transplant (HTx) recipients. Adult literature suggests that aspirin (ASA) use in the early post-HTx period may reduce the risk of CAV. This study aimed to determine the impact of early ASA use on the development of CAV in pediatric HTx recipients.

METHODS

All subjects <17 years of age at time of primary HTx who survived ≥3 years without evidence of CAV were identified for inclusion from the Pediatric Heart Transplant Society database (1996-2019). Early ASA use was defined as ASA started within the first 3 years post-HTx and was classified as continuous or intermittent. Frequency of ASA use was described across centers. Kaplan-Meier method assessed freedom from CAV and overall graft survival. Multiphase parametric hazard analyses and propensity score matched analysis were used to identify independent risk factors.

RESULTS

3,011 patients were included with 387 (13%) receiving continuous ASA, 676 (22%) receiving intermittent ASA, and 1,948 (65%) receiving no ASA. ASA use was highly variable across centers (0%-100%). At baseline patients receiving continuous ASA therapy demonstrated inferior graft survival (p < 0.001) and worse freedom from CAV (p = 0.002), but with lower CAV grades (p = 0.05). In multiphase parametric hazard modeling continuous ASA use was not independently associated with CAV, but remained associated with inferior graft survival. Propensity-matched sub-analysis between continuous and no ASA groups demonstrated no difference in freedom from CAV or overall graft loss.

CONCLUSIONS

ASA use varies widely across pediatric HTx centers. Early ASA use did not reduce the risk of CAV or graft loss in pediatric heart transplant recipients.

Low-dose aspirin confers protection against acute cellular allograft rejection after primary liver transplantation

This study investigated the effect of low-dose aspirin in primary adult liver transplantation (LT) on acute cellular rejection (ACR) as well as arterial patency rates. The use of low-dose aspirin after LT is practiced by many transplant centers to minimize the risk of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT), although solid recommendations do not exist. However, aspirin also possesses potent anti-inflammatory properties and might mitigate inflammatory processes after LT, such as rejection. Therefore, we hypothesized that the use of aspirin after LT has a protective effect against ACR. This is an international, multicenter cohort study of primary adult deceased donor LT. The study included 17 high-volume LT centers and covered the 3-year period from 2013 to 2015 to allow a minimum 5-year follow-up. In this cohort of 2365 patients, prophylactic antiplatelet therapy with low-dose aspirin was administered in 1436 recipients (61%). The 1-year rejection-free survival rate was 89% in the aspirin group versus 82% in the no-aspirin group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.94; p = 0.01). The 1-year primary arterial patency rates were 99% in the aspirin group and 96% in the no-aspirin group with an HR of 0.23 (95% CI, 0.13-0.40; p < 0.001). Low-dose aspirin was associated with a lower risk of ACR and HAT after LT, especially in the first vulnerable year after transplantation. Therefore, low-dose aspirin use after primary LT should be evaluated to protect the liver graft from ACR and to maintain arterial patency.

Noninvasive methods to reduce cardiac complications postheart transplant

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Long-term success of heart transplantation is limited by allograft rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). Classic management has relied on frequent invasive testing to screen for early features of rejection and CAV to allow for early treatment. In this review, we discuss new developments in the screening and prevention of allograft rejection and CAV.

RECENT FINDINGS

Newer noninvasive screening techniques show excellent sensitivity and specificity for the detection of clinically significant rejection. New biomarkers and treatment targets continue to be identified and await further studies regarding their utility in preventing allograft vasculopathy.

SUMMARY

Noninvasive imaging and biomarker testing continue to show promise as alternatives to invasive testing for allograft rejection. Continued validation of their effectiveness may lead to new surveillance protocols with reduced frequency of invasive testing. Furthermore, these noninvasive methods will allow for more personalized strategies to reduce the complications of long-term immunosuppression whereas continuing the decline in the overall rate of allograft rejection.

The novel proteomic signature for cardiac allograft vasculopathy

AIMS

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is the major long-term complication after heart transplantation, leading to mortality and re-transplantation. As available non-invasive biomarkers are scarce for CAV screening, we aimed to identify a proteomic signature for CAV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We measured urinary proteome by capillary electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry in 217 heart transplantation recipients (mean age: 55.0 ± 14.4 years; women: 23.5%), including 76 (35.0%) patients with CAV diagnosed by coronary angiography. We randomly and evenly grouped participants into the derivation cohort (n = 108, mean age: 56.4 ± 13.8 years; women: 22.2%; CAV: n = 38) and the validation cohort (n = 109, mean age: 56.4 ± 13.8 years; women: 24.8%, CAV: n = 38), stratified by CAV. Using the decision tree-based machine learning methods (extreme gradient boost), we constructed a proteomic signature for CAV discrimination in the derivation cohort and verified its performance in the validation cohort. The proteomic signature that consisted of 27 peptides yielded areas under the curve of 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.75-0.91, P < 0.001] and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.60-0.81, P = 0.001) for CAV discrimination in the derivation and validation cohort, respectively. With the optimized threshold of 0.484, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for CAV differentiation in the validation cohort were 68.4%, 73.2%, and 71.6%, respectively. With adjustment of potential clinical confounders, the signature was significantly associated with CAV [adjusted odds ratio: 1.31 (95% CI: 1.07-1.64) for per 0.1% increment in the predicted probability, P = 0.012]. Diagnostic accuracy significantly improved by adding the signature to the logistic model that already included multiple clinical risk factors, suggested by the integrated discrimination improvement of 9.1% (95% CI: 2.5-15.3, P = 0.005) and net reclassification improvement of 83.3% (95% CI: 46.7-119.5, P < 0.001). Of the 27 peptides, the majority were the fragments of collagen I (44.4%), collagen III (18.5%), collagen II (3.7%), collagen XI (3.7%), mucin-1 (3.7%), xylosyltransferase 1 (3.7%), and protocadherin-12 (3.7%). Pathway analysis performed in Reactome Pathway Database revealed that the multiple pathways involved by the signature were related to the pathogenesis of CAV, such as collagen turnover, platelet aggregation and coagulation, cell adhesion, and motility.

CONCLUSIONS

This pilot study identified and validated a urinary proteomic signature that provided a potential approach for the surveillance of CAV. These proteins might provide insights into CAV pathological processes and call for further investigation into personalized treatment targets.

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current review and future research directions

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a pathologic immune-mediated remodelling of the vasculature in transplanted hearts and, by impairing perfusion, is the major cause of late graft loss. Although best understood following cardiac transplantation, similar forms of allograft vasculopathy occur in other vascularized organ grafts and some features of CAV may be shared with other immune-mediated vasculopathies. Here, we describe the incidence and diagnosis, the nature of the vascular remodelling, immune and non-immune contributions to pathogenesis, current therapies, and future areas of research in CAV.

Aspirin Attenuates Cardiac Allograft Rejection by Inhibiting the Maturation of Dendritic Cells via the NF-κB Signaling Pathway

Background: Dendritic cells (DCs) serve as an important part of the immune system and play a dual role in immune response. Mature DCs can initiate immune response, while immature or semi-mature DCs induce immune hyporesponsiveness or tolerance. Previous studies have shown that aspirin can effectively inhibit the maturation of DCs. However, the protective effect of aspirin on acute cardiac allograft rejection has not been studied. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effect of aspirin exert on allograft rejection. Methods: The model of MHC-mismatched (BALB/c to B6 mice) heterotopic heart transplantation was established and administered intraperitoneal injection with aspirin. The severity of allograft rejection, transcriptional levels of cytokines, and characteristics of immune cells were assessed. Bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were generated with or without aspirin. The function of DCs was determined via mixed lymphocyte reaction (MLR). The signaling pathway of DCs was detected by Western blotting. Results: Aspirin significantly prolonged the survival of cardiac allograft in mouse, inhibited the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and the differentiation of effector T cells (Th1 and Th17), as well as promoted the regulatory T cells (Treg). The maturation of DCs in the spleen was obviously suppressed with aspirin treatment. In vitro, aspirin decreased the activation of NF-κB signaling of DCs, as well as impeded MHCII and co-stimulatory molecules (CD80, CD86, and CD40) expression on DCs. Moreover, both the pro-inflammatory cytokines and function of DCs were suppressed by aspirin. Conclusion: Aspirin inhibits the maturation of DCs through the NF-κB signaling pathway and attenuates acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Early aspirin use, allograft rejection, and cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Early aspirin (ASA) use after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) has been associated with lower rates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV). We hypothesized that the inverse association between ASA use and CAV incidence may be most pronounced in patients with allograft rejection.

METHODS

Patients receiving OHT at a single center 2004-2010 (n = 120) were categorized by early ASA use post-transplant (ASA use for > 6 months in the first year) and the presence of biopsy-defined acute cellular rejection (ACR) and/or antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) during 5-year follow-up. Propensity scores for ASA treatment were estimated using boosting models and applied by inverse probability of treatment weighting. The association between ASA use and time to moderate/severe CAV (ISHLT ≥ 2) was investigated.

RESULTS

Among patients with ACR or AMR, ASA therapy was associated with significantly lower rates of CAV≥ 2 (3.3 vs. 30.1%; P = .001; HR_adj .07; 95% CI .01-.52), whereas ASA therapy was not associated with lower rates of CAV in patients with no rejection (5.6 vs. 5.3%; P = .90; HR_adj 1.26; 95% CI .08-20.30; p_interaction  = .09).

CONCLUSIONS

Early ASA use after OHT was associated with lower rates of moderate to severe CAV only in those patients with episodes of allograft rejection.

Association of Aspirin Treatment With Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Progression and Adverse Outcomes After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Enhanced platelet reactivity may play a role in cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) progression. The use of antiplatelet agents after heart transplantation (HT) has been inconsistent and although aspirin (ASA) is often a part of the medication regimen after HT, limited evidence is available on its benefit.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CAV progression was assessed by measuring the difference in plaque volume and plaque index between the last follow-up and the baseline coronary intravascular ultrasound examination. Overall, 529 HT recipients were retrospectively analyzed (337 had ≥2 intravascular ultrasound studies). The progression in plaque volume (P = .007) and plaque index (P = .002) was significantly attenuated among patients treated with early ASA (within the first year after HT). Over a 6.7-year follow-up, all-cause mortality was lower with early ASA compared with late or no ASA use (P < .001). No cardiac deaths were observed in the early ASA group, and the risk of CAV-related graft dysfunction was significantly lower in this group (P = .03). However, the composite of all CAV-related events (cardiac death, CAV-related graft dysfunction, or coronary angioplasty) was not significantly different between the groups (P = .16).

CONCLUSIONS

Early ASA use after HT may delay CAV progression and decrease mortality and CAV-related graft dysfunction, but does not seem to affect overall CAV-associated events.

The effect of antiplatelet therapy on survival and cardiac allograft vasculopathy following heart transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is mediated by endothelial inflammation, platelet activation and thrombosis. Antiplatelet therapy may prevent the development of CAV. This systematic review and meta-analysis summarizes and appraises the evidence on the effect of antiplatelet therapy after heart transplantation (HT). CENTRAL(Ovid), MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase(Ovid) were searched from inception until April 30, 2020. Outcomes included CAV, all-cause mortality, and CAV-related mortality. Data were pooled using random-effects models. Seven observational studies including 2023 patients, mean age 52 years, 22% female, 47% with ischemic cardiomyopathy followed over a mean 7.1 years proved eligible. All studies compared acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) to no treatment and were at serious risk of bias. Data from 1911 patients in 6 studies were pooled in the meta-analyses. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of ASA on all-cause or CAV-related mortality. ASA may reduce the development of CAV (RR 0.75, 95% CI: 0.44-1.29) based on very low certainty evidence. Two studies that conducted propensity-weighted analyses showed further reduction in CAV with ASA (HR 0.31, 95% CI: 0.13-0.74). In conclusion, there is limited evidence that ASA may reduce the development of CAV. Definitive resolution of the impact of antiplatelet therapy on CAV and mortality will require randomized clinical trials.

Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement on Heart Transplantation: Patient Eligibility, Selection, and Post-Transplantation Care

Significant practice-changing developments have occurred in the care of heart transplantation candidates and recipients over the past decade. This Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiac Transplant Network Position Statement provides evidence-based, expert panel recommendations with values and preferences, and practical tips on: (1) patient selection criteria; (2) selected patient populations; and (3) post transplantation surveillance. The recommendations were developed through systematic review of the literature and using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The evolving areas of importance addressed include transplant recipient age, frailty assessment, pulmonary hypertension evaluation, cannabis use, combined heart and other solid organ transplantation, adult congenital heart disease, cardiac amyloidosis, high sensitization, and post-transplantation management of antibodies to human leukocyte antigen, rejection, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, and long-term noncardiac care. Attention is also given to Canadian-specific management strategies including the prioritization of highly sensitized transplant candidates (status 4S) and heart organ allocation algorithms. The focus topics in this position statement highlight the increased complexity of patients who undergo evaluation for heart transplantation as well as improved patient selection, and advances in post-transplantation management and surveillance that have led to better long-term outcomes for heart transplant recipients.

The pharmaceutical management of cardiac allograft vasculopathy after heart transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) is a major limitation to long-term survival after heart transplantation. Its peculiar pathophysiology involves multifactorial pathways including immune-mediated and metabolic risk factors, which are associated with the development of specific pathological lesions. The often diffuse and chronic nature of the disease reduces the effectiveness of revascularization procedures, and pharmacological prevention of the disease is the sole therapeutic approach with some proven efficacy.

AREAS COVERED

In this article, after briefly outlining the risk factors for CAV, the authors revise the potential pharmacological approaches that may reduce the burden of CAV. While several therapies have shown convincing efficacy in terms of CAV prevention diagnosed by coronary imaging, very few have been reported to improve prognosis with any meaningful level of evidence.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors believe that a customizable approach is necessary for clinical practice given the currently available evidence. Furthermore, it is important, in the future, to address the glaring therapeutic gap of an effective treatment against donor-specific antibodies, whose effect on endothelial injury is currently one of the major mechanisms of CAV development and for which no pharmacological treatment is currently available.

Impact of dipyridamole on adenosine dosing in pediatric and young adult patients after heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Relative contraindications to adenosine use have included heart transplant and dipyridamole. We previously demonstrated the safety and efficacy of adenosine-induced atrioventricular (AV) block in healthy young heart transplant recipients while suspending dipyridamole therapy (dual antiplatelet agent). This prospective follow-up study evaluated the safety and efficacy of adenosine use in the same cohort of heart transplant recipients while on dipyridamole.

METHODS

Adenosine was incrementally dosed until AV block occurred (maximum 200 mcg/kg up to 12 mg). The primary outcome was clinically significant asystole (≥12 seconds). Secondary outcomes included maximal adenosine dose, AV block duration, dysrhythmias, and clinical symptoms. Outcomes were compared to the parent study.

RESULTS

Thirty of 39 eligible patients (5-24 years) were tested. No patient (0%, CI 0%-8%) experienced clinically significant asystole. AV block occurred in 29/30 patients (97%, CI 86%-100%). The median dose causing AV block was 50mcg/kg (vs 100 mcg/kg off dipyridamole; P = .011). Seventeen patients (57%, CI 39%-72%) required less adenosine to achieve AV block on dipyridamole; six (20%) required more. AV block occurred at doses ≥25 mcg/kg in all patients. In pairwise comparison to prior testing off dipyridamole, no significant change occurred in AV block duration, frequency of cardiac ectopy, or incidence of reported symptoms. No atrial fibrillation/flutter occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

AV block often occurs at twofold lower adenosine doses in healthy young heart transplant recipients taking oral dipyridamole, compared with previous testing of this cohort off dipyridamole. Results suggest that initial dosing of 25 mcg/kg (maximum 0.8 mg) with stepwise escalation poses low risk of prolonged asystole on dipyridamole.

Platelet aggregation and response to aspirin therapy in cardiac allograft vasculopathy

BACKGROUND

Long-term survival after heart transplantation (HTx) is compromised by cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) characterized by coronary macro- and microvascular disease. The pathogenesis of CAV is unclear and may involve coronary thrombosis. We investigated whether HTx patients with CAV had higher platelet aggregation and turnover than HTx patients without CAV and healthy controls. Furthermore, we investigated the anti-platelet effect of low-dose aspirin in HTx patients.

METHODS

We included 57 patients who had undergone HTx (median 8.3 years from HTx) and 57 healthy controls. Platelet aggregation was measured on-aspirin and off-aspirin using impedance aggregometry with adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid (AA). We evaluated platelet turnover by flow cytometry, CAV burden by coronary angiography and echocardiography, and microvascular function by echocardiographic coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR).

RESULTS

Off-aspirin, HTx patients with CAV (n = 21) had higher ADP-induced platelet aggregation than healthy controls (p < 0.01) and HTx patients without CAV (n = 36) (p < 0.05). Aspirin treatment reduced AA-induced platelet aggregation in both HTx groups, but HTx patients with CAV had higher platelet aggregation on-aspirin than HTx patients without CAV (p < 0.05). Platelet turnover did not differ between HTx patients with CAV and HTx patients without CAV (p > 0.34). HTx patients with lower CFVR values had higher platelet aggregation than HTx patients with higher CFVR values (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-aspirin, platelet aggregation was higher in HTx patients with CAV than in HTx patients without CAV and healthy controls. On-aspirin, platelet aggregation was higher in HTx patients with CAV than in HTx patients without CAV. Aspirin monotherapy may not provide sufficient platelet inhibition in HTx patients with CAV.

Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy: The Enduring Enemy of Cardiac Transplantation

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy remains a major limiting factor in the long-term survival of the heart transplant recipient. Our understanding of its pathogenesis is continuously evolving as advances in imaging modalities have allowed a direct window into the natural history of the disease. Innovation in diagnostic modalities has spurred the proliferation of prognostic tools and biomarkers. And in parallel, pharmacological advances have emerged that have helped ameliorate the disease's progressive course.

Ethnic disparities in cardiac transplantation: opportunities to improve long-term outcomes in all cardiac transplant recipients

Ethnic disparities in cardiovascular outcomes have been increasingly recognized in the medical literature. In a recent paper in this journal, Peled et al. provide evidence that Arab Israelis may have worse outcome after cardiac transplant than their Jewish counterparts. This commentary explores possible explanations for the differing outcomes and suggests potential solutions that may improve outcomes for cardiac transplant recipients regardless of ethnicity.