Fibroproliferation in chronic lung allograft dysfunction: Association of mesenchymal cells in bronchoalveolar lavage with phenotypes and survival

The Lung Microbiome Predicts Mortality and Response to Azithromycin in Lung Transplant Recipients with Chronic Rejection

Rationale: Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the leading cause of death after lung transplant, and azithromycin has variable efficacy in CLAD. The lung microbiome is a risk factor for developing CLAD, but the relationship between lung dysbiosis, pulmonary inflammation, and allograft dysfunction remains poorly understood. Whether lung microbiota predict outcomes or modify treatment response after CLAD is unknown. Objectives: To determine whether lung microbiota predict post-CLAD outcomes and clinical response to azithromycin. Methods: Retrospective cohort study using acellular BAL fluid prospectively collected from recipients of lung transplant within 90 days of CLAD onset. Lung microbiota were characterized using 16S rRNA gene sequencing and droplet digital PCR. In two additional cohorts, causal relationships of dysbiosis and inflammation were evaluated by comparing lung microbiota with CLAD-associated cytokines and measuring ex vivo P. aeruginosa growth in sterilized BAL fluid. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with higher bacterial burden had shorter post-CLAD survival, independent of CLAD phenotype, azithromycin treatment, and relevant covariates. Azithromycin treatment improved survival in patients with high bacterial burden but had negligible impact on patients with low or moderate burden. Lung bacterial burden was positively associated with CLAD-associated cytokines, and ex vivo growth of P. aeruginosa was augmented in BAL fluid from transplant recipients with CLAD. Conclusions: In recipients of lung transplants with chronic rejection, increased lung bacterial burden is an independent risk factor for mortality and predicts clinical response to azithromycin. Lung bacterial dysbiosis is associated with alveolar inflammation and may be promoted by underlying lung allograft dysfunction.

The mitigating effect of exogenous carbon monoxide on chronic allograft rejection and fibrosis post-lung transplantation

BACKGROUND

Small airway inflammation and fibrosis or bronchiolitis obliterans (BO) is the predominant presentation of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) post-lung transplantation. Carbon monoxide (CO) is a critical endogenous signaling transducer with known anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic effects but its therapeutic potential in CLAD remains to be fully elucidated.

METHODS

Here we investigate the effect of inhaled CO in modulating chronic lung allograft rejection pathology in a murine orthotopic lung transplant model of BO (B6D2F1/J→DBA/2J). Additionally, the effects of CO on the activated phenotype of mesenchymal cells isolated from human lung transplant recipients with CLAD were studied.

RESULTS

Murine lung allografts treated with CO (250 ppm × 30 minutes twice daily from days 7 to 40 post-transplantation) demonstrated decreased immune cell infiltration, fibrosis, and airway obliteration by flow cytometry, trichrome staining, and morphometric analysis, respectively. Decreased total collagen, with levels comparable to isografts, was noted in CO-treated allografts by quantitative hydroxyproline assay. In vitro, CO (250 ppm × 16h) was effective in reversing the fibrotic phenotype of human CLAD mesenchymal cells with decreased collagen I and β-catenin expression as well as an inhibitory effect on ERK1/2 MAPK, and mTORC1/2 signaling. Sildenafil, a phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitor, partially mimicked the effects of CO on CLAD mesenchymal cells and was partially effective in decreasing collagen deposition in murine allografts, suggesting the contribution of cGMP-dependent and -independent mechanisms in mediating the effect of CO.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest a potential role for CO in alleviating allograft fibrosis and mitigating chronic rejection pathology post-lung transplant.

Biomarkers for Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Ready for Prime Time?

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major hurdle impairing lung transplant outcome. Parallel to the better clinical identification and characterization of CLAD and CLAD phenotypes, there is an increasing urge to find adequate biomarkers that could assist in the earlier detection and differential diagnosis of CLAD phenotypes, as well as disease prognostication. The current status and state-of-the-art of biomarker research in CLAD will be discussed with a particular focus on radiological biomarkers or biomarkers found in peripheral tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage' and circulating blood' in which significant progress has been made over the last years. Ultimately, although a growing number of biomarkers are currently being embedded in the follow-up of lung transplant patients, it is clear that one size does not fit all. The future of biomarker research probably lies in the rigorous combination of clinical information with findings in tissue, bronchoalveolar lavage' or blood. Only by doing so, the ultimate goal of biomarker research can be achieved, which is the earlier identification of CLAD before its clinical manifestation. This is desperately needed to improve the prognosis of patients with CLAD after lung transplantation.

Novel biomarkers of chronic lung allograft dysfunction: is there anything reliable?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) remains a major barrier preventing long-term survival following lung transplantation. As our clinical knowledge regarding its definition and presentation has significantly improved over the last years, adequate biomarkers to predict development of CLAD, phenotype of CLAD or prognosis post-CLAD diagnosis are definitely needed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Radiological and physiological markers are gradually entering routine clinical practice. In-depth investigation of biological samples including broncho-alveolar lavage, biopsy and serum has generated potential biomarkers involved in fibrogenesis, airway injury and inflammation but none of these are universally accepted or implemented although progress has been made, specifically regarding donor-derived cell-free DNA and donor-specific antibodies.

SUMMARY

Although a lot of promising biomarkers have been put forward, a very limited number has made it to routine clinical practice. Nevertheless, a biomarker that leads to earlier detection or more adequate disease phenotyping would advance the field enormously.